Forget the Emails … DNC Chair ADMITS DNC and Clinton Rigged Election Against Sanders

Forget the hacked/leaked emails showing that the Democratic National Committee stole the primary from Sanders and handed it to Clinton.

Forget whether the Ruskies hacked the emails in an attempt to throw the election to Trump or whether a DNC insider leaked the emails to Wikileaks.

The former interim Chair of the DNC, Donna Brazile, just confirmed in writing that the DNC rigged the election for Hillary.

Specifically, she says that a signed agreement between the DNC and the Clinton campaign gave all decision-making power to Clinton – and hosed Sanders – because the DNC was flat broke, and the Clinton campaign agreed to bail it out (and then more or less laundered money through the DNC).

Remembers, Sanders might have beat Trump had the DNC and Clinton campaign not sabotaged the primary.

So can we all forget about the emails and focus for one minute on the real story:  this episode of  collusion … and the corruption of the mainstream parties?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • WillDippel

    Here is an article that looks at one surprising group that Hillary Clinton blames for her loss:

    https://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2017/09/who-else-does-hillary-blame-for-her-loss.html

    Ms. Clinton’s grasp on why she really lost the 2016 presidential race appears to be tenuous at best.

  • ICFubar

    This statement by Brazile merely establishes what the court handling the now defunct law suit against the DNC claimed was the prerogative of the DNC to conduct primaries as they see fit.

    “There is no America, there is no democracy.” There is only the Fed, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi and Bank of America. These are the nations of the world.

  • andrew1212

    Donna Brazile claims the agreement between Hillary Clinton & the DNC was signed in August 2015–that after the agreement was signed HRC controlled the DNC. Bernie Sanders and his supporters were flat out ROBBED of any chance; every step along the way to the primaries (and during) was a FARCE played upon the American public–because HRC owned the DNC and therefore the rules were rigged to favor HRC at every turn.

    Let us not forget that polls in the spring/summer of 2016 showed Bernie Sanders handily WINNING a one-on-one battle vs. Trump (and HRC being in a very close race vs. Trump). If I recall correctly, most polls showed Sanders winning by 4 or 5 points vs. Trump; while HRC was favored to win by just one or two points vs. Trump.

    The US media had plenty of Dirty Tricks up their sleeves, too…remember?

    Bernie Sanders was voted TIME magazine’s “Person of the Year” by readers in 2016; but the editor’s chose someone else. Before the primaries began, TIME also chose to run an article questioning whether Bernie Sanders was actually photographed protesting at the University of Chicago in the early 60’s against racist policies of university housing and the city of Chicago’s segregated and racist school policies. Eventually the Chicago Tribune found a photo of Bernie getting arrested at a protest–and buried the photo and their article on Page 14 (imagine if it had been a photo of HRC getting arrested while protesting–that would have been on Page One, right?)

    Not to be outdone, the Washington Post ran 18 negative articles about Bernie Sanders in 18 hours during the primary season.

    The Associated Press ran an article on the eve of the final primary in California with the headline essentially proclaiming “HRC has wrapped up enough Super Delegate votes to WIN the DNC nomination” (which was false–because the Super Delegates couldn’t vote until the convention, which was weeks away. Most people don’t realize the AP is owned by the subscribing newspapers and operated as a pseudo-non-profit and have many of the major papers on their Board of Directors. But the AP’s story on the eve of the CA primary was just one last Dirty Trick from HRC’s Billion Dollar Media Machine.

    Likewise, the networks gave Bernie Sanders miniscule coverage on the evening news compared to other candidates–especially once you consider the Democratic field was shortened to just 2 candidates dominating the race quite early during the primary season. But the same networks did manage to pump Trump plenty of air time before and during the primaries. Bernie had just a hand-full of mentions on the networks news coverage; while HRC and Trump each received well over 50+ network mentions.

    Social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit changed their rules to protect HRC. Twitter has now admitted to repressing negative posts surrounding HRC; while Reddit completely re-wrote their rules in their r/politics sub (one of the biggest changes was disallowing “Self Post Saturdays” in which users could write their own posts).

    …but it was RT’s $100,000 splurge on Twitter that threw the 2016 US presidential election, right?

    • Joe Bloe

      Bernie won the polls by avg of like 10 pts

  • kimyo

    utterly outrageous ‘reporting’ on this story at the bbc: Former Democratic chief: Clinton ‘took control’ of party

    Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, she says, had effective control over the DNC before any ballots were cast in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. Starting in August 2015, the Clinton team controlled the committee’s “finances, strategy and all the money raised”.

    It had say over staff hiring and veto power over press releases and mailings.

    This is not, as some have argued, proof that the primary process was “rigged” against the Vermont senator, who finished a surprisingly strong second to (but still millions of votes behind) Hillary Clinton when the primaries had concluded.

    …., Ms Brazile never said that Mrs Clinton “rigged” the system.

  • kimyo

    De Blasio Demands Explanation, as Decline in Registered Brooklyn Voters Doubles

    But new data provided by the city Board of Elections on Monday indicates it actually removed 126,000 Brooklyn voters from the rolls, according to executive director Michael Ryan.

    how did they know WHICH democrats needed to be removed from the rolls? my money is on google. living in brooklyn, registered as a democrat and searched for bernie vids on youtube? no vote for you!

  • hyperbola

    Those who were paying attention (and avoiding MSM propaganda) knew about this long before the election. The MSM censored this.

    How Hillary Clinton Bought the Loyalty of 33 State Democratic Parties
    https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/