Netanyahu’s Pro-Nazi Lie: ‘Hitler wanted to expel the Jews.’

Eric Zuesse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=37&v=dadgep_e0Hc

“Netanyahu: Hitler didn’t want to exterminate Jews”

RT published Oct 21, 2015

Netanyahu (0:25-): “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time [28 November 1941]; he wanted to expel the Jews.”

This statement by Israel’s Prime Minister is profoundly false; the record is clear on this matter: Hitler merely played along with Hjalmar Schacht and others who favored expulsion of Jews in preference to annihilating them; Nazis who expected all Jews ultimately to leave Germany were a significant part of Hitler’s constituency, and Hitler wanted their full cooperation at least until the “final solution” was beyond being any longer denied; he needed the services of all Nazis and of all Nazi-supporters, until he was ready to spring his trap (the extermination-program for Jews).

Here is how I had discussed this matter, on pages 218-219 of my 2000 book Why the Holocaust Happened:

The consensus with which he started was only for the elimination of the Jews, which could mean either expulsion or extermination. (Sterilizing the Jews was ruled out by Hitler: as an alternative to extermination, it might have drawn too much support.) Expulsion obviously had to be presented as having been tried but failed; only then could the entire hierarchy unite behind Hitler’s plan to carry out God’s “admonition finally to put an end to the permanently continuous original sin of a race poisoning and to give the Almighty Creator beings as He Himself created them.” Mere expulsion could provide no such assurance. But a display nonetheless had to be made.

By January 1939, Hitler’s official policy was for the expulsion of all Jews. By June 1940, it was for their expulsion specifically to Madagascar — a goal even less practicable than expulsion itself, since the “Madagascar Plan” required as prerequisites the defeat of both France and England, and could thus realistically not even be considered as a short-term measure which is what it was presented as being. Hitler knew better. And along the way, he skillfully set up numerous highly visible public displays of the unwillingness of foreign nations to accept the flood of dispossessed Jews that he was offering as refugees. (As Rudolph Binion noted in his 1976 Hitler Among the Germans, pp. 29-30, Hitler had even fired Reichsbank chief Hjalmar Schacht early in 1939 because Schacht had been too effective in promoting the expulsion of Jews; and both Binion, and Richard Breitman’s 1991 The Architect of Genocide, pp. 50-1, documented that even Hitler had acknowledged that expulsion of Jews was really intended as nothing more than “exporting anti-Semitism.”) Hitler gleefully observed the embarrassment of other countries that proclaimed their opposition to anti-Semitism but that turned a cold shoulder to these desperate refugees. Hitler was trying expulsion; other nations just refused to receive what he was offering them. The United States, for example, not only did not increase its immigration-quota for Jews; it failed even to admit as many Jews as the official quota permitted. David S. Wyman’s 1984 The Abandonment of the Jews documents (pp. 100, 365, 410) the repeated refusal of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to meet with Jewish leaders to deal with the problem, and also establishes the President’s own personal knowledge of the Nazis’ anti-Semitic exterminations. For Hitler, such international response was itself part of the “sleepwalking” toward genocide. By the time of the Wannsee Conference on 20 January 1942 to coordinate the actions of all state agencies involved with the “final solution,” all participants were reading their respective roles from a playbook written by none other than the Führer himself. And by that time, they were all prepared for those roles — knew them by heart, actually. When three days later, on 23 January, Hitler in his Secret Conversations (Table-Talk) addressed Himmler sarcastically about the matter, Himmler understood very well what he meant by saying of his policy toward the Jews, “I’m extraordinarily humane. . . . But if they refuse to leave voluntarily, I see no other solution than extermination.”

The Jews never were to be expelled; the entire world was to be made Judenrein.

Here is how universal Hitler’s anti-Semitism was: As recounted in Gerald Fleming’s 1984 Hitler and the Final Solution (p. 104), Hitler on 28 November 1941, promised the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem that, following the defeat of Britain, the Nazis would take care of “the Jews living in” Palestine. Obviously, those Jews were not in Germany, and not even in Europe.

The universalism of this policy was, itself, a sign of its religious origin: Hitler, like any fundamentalist, was convinced of the universality of the moral principles that motivated him. This universalism was shared by the medieval Crusaders who had sought to win the world to God. For Hitler, it was not enough merely to “purify” Germany; his vision was global because it was universal, founded upon the bedrock moral principles with which he had been raised. Adolf Hitler was a Crusader.

One might reasonably be uncertain, however, regarding the extent to which Hitler was actually concerned with anyone’s welfare but his own; after all, the Holocaust was his personal ticket to salvation — an eternity in heaven rather than in the Jews’ hell where he would be surrounded by other “people of the devil.” If the cost of his ticket of eternal membership was to be the deaths of millions — not only Jews, but others that he viewed as imperfect, diseased, defective, and not such as to “give the Almighty Creator beings as He Himself created them” — then so much the better; for all these were “people of the devil”; Hitler’s God would smile upon his great service in carrying out upon them the vengeance of the Lord. The more horrifying that vengeance, the better.

One possible hypothesis to explain Netanyahu’s false assertion there, would be sheer ignorance of history on his part, but for Israel’s long-serving head-of-state to be that ignorant of why the Holocaust happened, would mean he’s a fool, and Netanyahu is a highly intelligent person.

Another possible hypothesis would be that he’s driven by hatred of Muslims. This hypothesis is consistent with all the evidence regarding him, including that video-clip. The full video-clip shows Netanyahu saying (in this speech, which was delivered on 20 October 2015: “[This attack and other attacks on the Jewish community in 1920, 1921, 1929] were instigated by a call of the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, who was later sought for war crimes, in the Nuremberg trials because he had a central role in fomenting the final solution, he flew to Berlin, Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews and Haj Amin al-Husseini said, ‘If you expel them, then they’ll all come here. So, what should I do with them,’ he asked. He [Hitler] said, ‘Burn them’.” Netanyahu was there blaming the Holocaust on Muslims, not on Christians (even though it was actually planned and carried out not only by German Christians but by Christians in many other countries, which the Roman Catholic Hitler was leading in this entire vast enterprise). The idea that the Mufti, whom Hitler had never even met until so late as 28 November 1941, inspired him to commit the Holocaust, which had already actually started before that meeting, is ludicrous. A person as intelligent as Netanyahu, is almost certainly lying to assert it. Either that, or else he’s insane.

According to the only surviving official record of what transpired at the Mufti-Hitler meeting, which was that of the Reich Chancellory, Hitler and the Mufti actually discussed many things on that occasion, not only Jews, and there is no indication whatsoever that the promise for “the destruction of the Jewish element residing in the Arab sphere” after the anticipated Nazi win of WW II, came from the Mufti; it was instead, as described there, offered by Hitler to, and greatly appreciated by, the Mufti. Netanyahu’s assertion that Hitler was asked by the Mufti, “What should I do with them,” and that Hitler instructed him “Burn them,” is pure fabrication, without basis in the only surviving record that was made at the time. The Christian Hitler had planned the Holocaust, and his plan for it included various stages; it didn’t just appear to him all at once or as just one idea or one act — nor did the Mufti give the idea to him on 28 November 1941, nor ever.

Netanyahu’s Minister of Justice is his long-time close friend and former aide, Ayelet Shaked, who is a blatantly racist hater of Palestinians, hardly different in her beliefs than Hitler was in his, except for what the target is, and what the surrounding system of constraints is within which to be a successful politician, not only nationally, but also internationally. Netanyahu might himself be as racist against Palestinians as is his chosen Justice Minister. But, in any case, he’s certainly a liar: Hitler, and not the Grand Mufti, planned and initiated and carried out the extermination of Jews.

Victoria Richards wrote in Britain’s Independent, on 21 October 2015 (the same day as RT’s video of that excerpt from the speech which had been delivered the prior day), an excellent article placing into a broader context Netanyahu’s blaming the Holocaust on Muslims, headlining, “Netanyahu’s claims that a Palestinian leader was to blame for the Holocaust have been debunked before: In 2012, he described Haj Amin al-Husseini as ‘one of the leading architects of the Final Solution’ in a Knesset speech.” In that speech, on 24 January 2012, Netanyahu had said:

Haj Amin al-Husseini was one of the architects of the Final Solution. He traveled to Berlin. He lobbied and implored Hitler, as was stated by Adolf Eichmann’s deputy at the Nuremberg trials, and this is documented in other sources, and persuaded him more than anyone else to carry out the Final Solution. Not to allow the Jews to leave lest they come here but to annihilate them, to incinerate them.

Interestingly, on that occasion, Netanyahu had alleged that the idea to “burn” or “incinerate” the Jews didn’t come from Hitler but from Husseini himself. At least, Netanyahu softened that lie, when he repeated it three years later.

However, even the racist-fascist (or ideologically nazi — meaning not necessarily a member of Germany’s Nazi Party, but any follower of the racist-fascist ideology it represented, and this ideological term “nazi” refers also to KKK, etc., including bigoted Jews, such as) Netanyahu — even Israel’s current racist-fascist Prime Minister — doesn’t allege that Hitler and Husseini had ever met together prior to 28 November 1941. And, Hitler’s mass-killing centers were already operating prior to “Weimar, Nov. 25, ’41 8:58 a.m” (that’s three days prior to the Mufti-Hitler meeting) when Dr. Friedrich Mennecke, at Buchenwald, wrote, to his wife, telling her that the killing of “1200 Jews” had been done in Buchenwald that day, November 25th, without even examining the “patients,” but instead as “a purely theoretical job” (i.e., on the basis of racist-fascist ideology); and, that, in addition, “After the Jews come about 300 Aryans as 3rd portion, who again will have to be ‘examined’,” before they, too, might (perhaps the next day) be declared unfit to live, and sent directly to slaughter.

Whereas the famous Hitler-apologist David Irving says that Hitler wasn’t to blame for the Holocaust because Goebbels had somehow inspired him to do it if it had been done at all, Benjamin Netanyahu says that Hitler wasn’t to blame for the Holocaust because the Mufti had somehow inspired Hitler to do it.

Netanyahu is almost certainly not as stupid as he pretends to be, but he apparently knows that his voters are — and, for an extremely successful far-right Prime Minister, this is (based upon the available evidence) all that really matters to him. It’s a successful tactic to help whip-up, amongst Israel’s Jews, the hatred of Muslims, that had earlier been expressed by Netanyahu’s now chosen-and-serving Minister of Justice, Ayelet Shaked. This is Netanyahu’s way of spreading to other Israelis his own type of nazism (against Muslims, especially in Israel), which is already common enough in Israel to have gotten him elected as that nation’s leader.

On 21 October 1941, a month prior to meeting with the Mufti, Hitler, in the privacy of his bunker, concluded a long tirade against Jews (as transcribed in his Table-Talk) by saying: “By exterminating this pest, we shall do humanity a service of which our soldiers can have no idea.” Hitler’s buddy, Himmler, stated, in a speech to top SS leaders, two years later, when the Holocaust was in full swing, on 4 October 1943, that this extermination was necessary for them to carry out, in order to have “exterminated a bacterium because we do not want in the end to be infected by the bacterium and die of it.” Hitler had stated, on various occasions, that the “Jewish infection” or “Jewish bacterium” or “blood-poisoning by Jews,” was transmitted to non-Jews in their “blood,” and so Jews must be entirely eradicated like plague-carrying rats — not only in Germany, but beyond. Hitler said, on 24 February 1943: “This fight will not end with the planned annihilation of the Aryan [which to him meant the descendants of Adam and Eve in Genesis 3] but with the extermination of the Jew [which to him meant the descendants of the snake in Genesis 3] in Europe. Beyond this, thanks to this fight, our movement’s world of thought will become the common heritage of all people.” Hitler had gotten his idea of the “Thousand-Year Reich” from Revelation 20:1-7. To him it came from “The Bible — Monumental History of Mankind,” which told this “History” not merely past, but also future, even beyond the next thousand years. One could say that it was Hitler’s sect of Christianity, but nothing really was original in it. And it certainly wasn’t Muslim (such as Netanyahu repeatedly suggests it to have been).

To Hitler, Palestinians were fighting the good fight, regardless of what their motivation for it was. He didn’t care what the Mufti’s motivation was (and it was far different from Hitler’s on this matter), but only that the Palestinians would keep up, and be determined to win, their war against that territory’s Jews.

False statements are common from all fascists, including Netanyahu, but the history here is clear. The history on this matter is incontrovertible. It is not in dispute. All that is even in question is whether Netanyahu is a liar, or whether instead he’s insane.

However, whatever he is, his apologetics for Hitler are especially understandable from him if he, Netanyahu, is seen as being an ideological brother-in-arms of Hitler — two racist-fascists — and consequently as Netanyahu ‘justifying’ himself thereby, and not only as his expressing a surprisingly sympathetic view regarding the actual initiator, planner, and overseer, of the anti-Jewish Holocaust.

There is no reason why a Jew cannot be also a nazi — but only an uncapitalized one, only an ideological nazi. There can be (and are) racist fascists in all ethnicities, religions, and nations, and against any ethnicity, religion, or nation. Actual good and evil aren’t properties of any of them. The claim that they are, that some groups are morally superior to other groups, is a basic part of their common Big Lie, because all truthful evaluations are about individual persons instead of about any groups they belong to. And that Big Lie — the allegation that some groups are better than others, that moral attributes (“better than” or “worse than”) belong to groups instead of only to individuals — might be as common today, as it was then. Israel’s current Prime Minister is merely an example of it. Hitler thought that non-Jews are better than Jews. Netanyahu thinks that Jews are better than non-Jews. But it’s all false. And the lie was common enough in 1930s Germany, and in today’s Israel, to have gotten both Hitler and Netanyahu elected to lead their nation.

Thus, too, the Nazis who tried to kill Hitler were heroes, and the Jews who try to shift Hitler’s blame onto others are the opposite — simply Jewish nazis — regardless of whether they are liars, or insane.

Victims and perpetrators of nazism — racist fascism — can be of any ethnicity, religion, or etc. No one is safe from nazism, and all nazis need to lie in order to succeed, because racist fascism simply cannot be based upon truth. It’s not just Hitler and other racist Christians against Jews, and Netanyahu and other racist Jews against Muslims. For example, another lying far-right Christian, Stephen Bannon, of Donald Trump’s campaign and Administration, is explicitly bigoted against Muslims, not against Jews — he is a Roman Catholic like Hitler, but an anti-Muslim like Netanyahu, and this was shown on 11 August 2017 by Peter Maass at The Intercept, headlining “Steve Bannon Said He Learned to Fear Muslims When He Visited Pakistan. Except He Was Probably in Hong Kong.” And, to cite yet another religion, Hinduism: on 13 July 2017, Prem Singh, of the Socialist Party of India, bannered “The Implications of Ramnath Kovind’s Presidency”, and he noted that India’s conservative BJP party and the RSS Hindu-nationalist movement were uniting, and Singh wrote that:

The governor of Tripura recently tweeted that Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, founder of Jan Sangh, had suggested that Hindu-Muslim strife could only be resolved through civil war. A civil war for a Muslim-free India may seem far-fetched right now; but … the way educated, well off/cultured Hindus are falling easy victims to Islamophobia, it doesn’t seem like they have learnt any lessons from the tragedy of Partition. Emotional claims about family and children will not hold against civil war. Hasn’t Modi left his family, and even his wife, for the ‘Hindu Rashtra’? As the noose of neo-imperialism tightens, the hate-mongering against Muslims and Christians will also rise. Other minority religious communities will also get caught in this hate mania. The failure to become either modern or world citizens, will be compensated by BJP-RSS by installing ‘Hindu president’, ‘Hindu prime minister’, ‘Hindu government’, ‘Hindu development’, ‘Hindu technology’, ‘Hindu knowledge’ and so on, in the ‘Hindu Rashtra’. … The RSS will gun for its long-awaited agenda of dispossessing the Muslims, already dispossessed of democracy.

The lies, and the targets, and the victims, differ; but the ideology is the same: racist fascism. It’s common in many countries.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • m96

    Holocaust has been debunked over and over by now. Nothing points to it being true. Much material can be found at holocaustdeprogrammingscourse.com
    Or at least start with David Cole’s docus, who is a Jew himself. Might make it a bit easier for people with severe brainwash imprint.

    • cettel

      You’ve been fooled by lies from liars, and you here pass your ‘knowledge’ along.

      • m96

        Haha. No. You have been fooled by 70 year of brainwash by (((Hollywood))) and the whole establishemnt. You havent stuided the subject at all. Start with Davdi Cole. Its probably the easiest. Or maybe David Irving or Ernst Zündel.

  • Zartan

    Interesting subject, but it has “always” failed the reality test.

    First, the only factor that “enabled an environment” where thousands of people “Bakers, Carpenters, and Candlestick Makers” could voluntarilly agree to run Extermination Camps ( tens-of-thousands participated) was due to Constant Allied Bombing of Civilians. This produced Total War. The US government “always ignores” this fact to hide their own guilt for causing such to happen.

    Hitler Blamed the Jews for the War. In 1939, he warned the World in a Televised Speech, that ” IF the Jews succeeded in starting another War, that it would not be the end of Germany, but the end of the Jewish Race in Europe. SO … Perhaps, He had plans? Ideas? Thoughts? However, nobody, not even Americans thought it was anything but retorhic at the time. I believe it was “a form of self-furfilling prophecy” where as HItler Himself was not even “aware” and was ranting. To assume anything more is to give Hitler “Godlike Qualities” and I do not believe in such, though, He was Very Intelligent and Gifted, Hitler was Human. The War Happened and things went to HELL; therefore, Hitler and His Commanders saw no other Option “and wanted to take vengence on the JEWS for the War” many years later.

    Herman Goring testified, on HIS death bed, that there were no plans for a final solution? His testimony is very powerful because he had a cyanide pill under his pillow the day of his Testimony. He had no reason to lie. Could he have lied for his Troops, Sure? However, this is one bit of evidence that says, perhaps, the allies exxaggerated a bit. Field Marshall Milch was half Jewish, so if such Hatred was in Hitlers Heart, MILCH would have been sacked. There were plenty of capible men to replace him. Eichmann was in charge of the planned “export of Jews” prior to the war, and up until 1942, I think, he was negotiating with the Arabs to export the Jews to Palestine. The War Necessitated Slave labor, so the plans for the Jews were for LABOR, and then, later, perhaps, as conditions worsened, extermination?

    Goring Swore that Crematoriums were due to the poor conditions in the camps, which he never denied, and outbreaks of TB and other diseases killed many necessitating bodies to be cremated. If you look at all the NAZI building projects during the war, and realize their entire male population was fielded for WAR, then it becomes reality that they needed slave labor. Only at the Very End, would it be possible to consider, liquidating the Labor. And, truthfully, it does not bode well for the story that after such a crime committed that survivors would have been allowed to live. I would imagine, before a camp was allowed to be captured, it would have been “SHUT” and all inhabitants liquidated.

    Why would the Jewish Leader Lie about the Holocaust? This is a Holy subject for them, so I believe, as best as we know, He is telling the Truth. Extermination prior to 1942, SS Wanasee Conference makes no sense. Sure, I believe it happend as 27-million Russians, 5-Million Germans, and 6-Million Jews, or so, were killed or murdered in the War. Total War is Bad.

    And, GOD … well, if you Christians even bothered to read your bible, FLOODS … Plagues … Annihilations of entire Cities? Sounds like Hitler? So, Killing 1/2, or more, of the Jews after breaking them out of Egypt is not Harsh? WOW! I love God, but I am a Realist. God is no Softie! SS men, including, Himmler, ( he was a Christian) used to Pray before doing their duties in these camps! Sad. However, War does terrible things to people and all suffer because of it. Many in the SS also committed suicide because of such terrible duty.

    Now, if you need some perspective, well, Imagine, if 9/11, happened x 1000 daily. Think … America, what would become of your Muslim Population? I am no FOOL, so you will not fool me; therefore, think about your chances of FOOLING GOD. How many Million have already been killed because of 9/11?

    DO NOT LIE.

  • PB

    Sounds a bit like that argument about how many Angels could dance on the head of a pin.

    • cettel

      Instead, it’s an argument about whom to blame for the Holocaust — hardly about angels and pins.

  • ZARTAN

    You can delete my posts, it does not offend me, because it only takes me 5-10 minutes to type them out. This only shows lack a of aptitude on behalf of those doing the deleting. If you cannot challenge me, or debate, and are forced to delete me, I WIN.

    Thanks for Inflating my Ego, Cettle!

  • ZARTAN

    This argument is lame. The Germans are on Record , and anyone can do thier homework, because Extermination did not start until 1942, wannasee conference. Prior, they were working on deals to export Jews to Palestine. -Eichmann. The Jewish Leader is not going to Lie … Holocaust is thier Holy Grail.

    When the War Broke, Slave Labor was needed so it cancelled the export, then when the war was being lost and ALLIED CARPET BOMBING fueld the German Public/Military to Proceed with Extermination, it began. You do not liquidate your slave labor force, until all is lost. Common Sense, People! However, it does not bode well for the holocaust story that anyone was allowed to escape to tell the tale. One would imagine, and the Germans were very Clever people, that before a camp was to be liberated “it would be SHUT” and all inhabitants therein liquidated. Criminals do not like to leave witnessess.

    America is also responsible for the holocaust for elevating the WAR to TOTAL WAR with Alled Carpet Bombing of German Cities. Nobody Carpet Bombed USA! That FAT FOOL, Churchill Started it with Germany!

    Finally, Hitler never could have even considered the FINAL SOLUTION without ALLIED HELP. Carpet Bombing does Wonders for Opening Extermination Camps! Hell, look at your silly GITMO and imagine if 9/11 was going on 1000x a day! What would become of the Muslims?

    Congratulations, FOOLS!

    • cettel

      ZARTAN has read this article that provides linked documentation that the Holocaust had begun even prior to the meeting between the Mufti and Hitler, but he ignores that and the other facts this article documents, and he merely alleges that prior to the Wannsee Conference there was no extermination program against the Jews. A reader like that is no reader at all, just a person with fixed false opinions — prejudices.

      • ZARTAN

        There are many sides to this story, many facts, opinions, and extrapolations. There is also lots of confusion, conflation and agendas. There is no simple answer. I can do you one better, in 1939, ( televised speech) Hitler stated: “that if the Jewish international financiers succeeded in starting another war that it would not be the end of Germany but the end of the Jewish Race in Europe.”

        Hitler was known for making flamboyant speeches and grandiose, bellicous threats. If he was planning such, ( it would have been top-secret) he never would have announced it to the world ahead of time. People make threats but seldom carry them out. Now, when the war went “south” those threats could have been made into reality. However,The population would have to be willing. And, there is the Problem … The People would have to accept liquidation of the Jews.

        It is real easy to pin the blame on Hitler, but Hitler never threw a Switch! Hitler never stepped foot in a Camp. IT took Tens-of-Thousands of willing participants to bring about this Holocaust ( if it indeed happend, I was not there) but I do not see it as even possible, until 1942, when the war started getting UGLY and Civilians were BOMBED with Impunity and Total War Flourished. You need motivation for a Crime of Such Gargantuan proportions. Prior to 42, ( war years) the Jews were needed for slave labor, and before that they were trying to export them. Only harsh realities of the Eastern Front, and Allied Bombing of German Cities in the west could have motivated people to commit such a crime.

        For every action there is a Reaction: People do not act without Motive.

  • Scoot Wad

    Oh boy, you’ve really stepped in it this time Eric. There is no documented proof among a culture obsessed with documentation that the ‘final solution’ was to exterminate the Jews. They were to be put to work until deportation is what all the documents claim. No one wanted them btw, no one. I wasn’t sure before but I am now, you’re a shill.

  • 1johnnyrotten1

    first this guy completely ignores the zio cons role in the 9/11 false flag now he tries to bring up the holohoax canard that has been shoved down our throats for over fifty years now… theres a reason that questioning the holohoax is ILLEGAL in most of europe…if examined using scientific evidence it would be revealed to be a farce… the tribe has used it to get sympathy and money from the stupid goyim since the 60’s…http://www.holohoax101.org/

  • ZARTAN

    Here is an Interesting tidbit for those who deny the Holohoax: Field Marshal: Erhard Milch, was 1/2 Jew, his Father was Jewish, which would have made him a subject for Extermination. How did He Escape, yet, alone, retain his position as a German Field Marshal? Surly, he would have known and said nothing for His people?

    Herman Goring denied the entire Story, and gave very convincing testimony on his Death Bed, that there was never an order to Exterminate the Jews? Herman could have been sacrificing himself for his man? However, I am sure if HE went along with the Holocaust Story, the US would have given him an easy sentence. Now … “Mayer” Was Known for His GREED, and there is no way he would have passed up a Deal for Himself. Oh, and Remember, he was EVIL, so there is no way that he would be adverse to lying about the Holohoax.

    Gorings Testamony is Convincing.

    • Army of Addicts

      Goring probably thought he was, very shortly, about to stand before his maker and account for

      his treatment of “God’s Chosen People”. One would say just about anything in order to score a few points as they were “checking out”. His possible last minute doubts as to Hitler’s legitimacy as

      a servant of God, as some claimed, may have motivated him to say what he did. Not to mention, he was probably aware that his final words would be heard by many.

      According to Christianity, there is very little that it’s god will not forgive. Pascal’s Wager at work here, for sure.

      • ZARTAN

        God has been known to send Destroyers to Punish His “so-called” chosen people. Jerusalem was Destroyed many times by God. And, God Slew most of the Jews outside of Egypt. I would not want to be a Jew. Many in the SS swore ( including, Himmler) that they were doing Gods Work. The Jews Hate this, but if they would acknowledge their imperfection; then perhaps, lessons would be learned and all forgiven?

        Goring had too powerful of a personailtiy to lie. He was too Proud. Goring would “shout at the Judges” at Nurenburgh. He would also admonish others for their lack of Loyalty to Hitler. I know the US government would have scammed X-Hitler Big Wigs to go along with the Holocaust Story, some did, like Albert Spheer. He would have been more guilty than Goring; but somehow, He got a short prison sentence instead of a Rope. Spheer was the Slave Labor King, as Minister of Armorments Production and Procurement.

        Goring cheated the Hangman, and left a note: ” You mistakenly thought you could put the ReichsMarschal to the Rope, Impossible.” He swollowed Cyanide, that night, and the Note was found the Next Morning. Someone with such a Powerful Personailty is almost Resistent to Lying about their deeds. Now, could he have lied for his Men? sure?

        However, Gorings testimony was convincing. I do not think He would lie about camps, because He knew the Score. He admonished the Allies for their Bombing of Civilians, Treatment of Blacks in America, and many other Items … He was a Star, and would not Bow down to Allied BS. Goring was the Only “Big Wig” Hitler Trusted.

        You can watch the Proceedings … Goring ran the Court.

        • Army of Addicts

          Goring’s loyalty was to Hitler(God’s representative in Goring’s eyes},which is above loyalty to his own principals. If Hitler wanted facts hidden unto death then Goring would make it so, and do it convincingly.

          It’s Christian doctrine that lying is acceptable, if it glorifies God. On an international scale, might makes right and the ends justify the means.

    • Deborahhmoreno


      my friend’s sister-in-law gets $85 an hour on the internet. she has been unemployed for four months. last month her check was $14416 just working on the internet a few hours a day… ➤check➤ out
      ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancialCashJobs80GreatCenter/Home/Wage….
      ❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂❂::::ae80.

  • Rehmat

    Eric Zuesse is author of 2001 book, Why The Holocaust Happened: Its Religious Cause and Scholarly Cover-up. Zuesse, like Abraham Foxman, blames the Christian Bible’s (NT) teachings for the hate and murder of Jews during WWII. Contrary to that Rabbi Marvin Antelman in 1974 book, To Eliminate The Opiate claimed that the Crypto-Jew followers of Shabbetai Tzvi/Jacob Frank, known as Frankist Jews were responsible for the WW II and the Holocaust.

    Zuesse also claims that Saudi Arabia was behind 9/11 terrorist attacks. The problem with Eric Zuesse’s Fake News is that Saudi Arabia since its creation by the British Zionist colonial power after WWI, has never carried a terrorist attack on American interests. However, Israel is the only state in the Arab world which has carried several terrorist attacks against United States assets before 9/11
    .

    • TimeToWakeUPAmerica

      +1, Rehmat. You are 100% correct, in your statements. You see, Netanyahu is the Leader of Israel. And, Israel is JUST AS MUCH A PROXY OF WESTERN FINANCE & THE ‘CITY’ OF LONDON ~ AS IS SAUDI ARABIA. You see, my DEEP Historical research (of the past TWENTY YEARS) has shown me, that PALESTINE was NEVER the location of the events which are described in both the OLD Testament AND the NEW Testament. The true location of those events was largely in Britain & the Baltic Sea region. Rothschild-Israel was created in Palestine, in 1948. Prior to that, it was the DECEPTION of Roman Emperor Constantine (over 1,600 years ago!), who moved the Roman Empire formerly in Rome, to Istanbul (& renamed it Constantinople, after himself), and along with the Flavian and Piso Families, established the complete RUSE, that Palestine was the location of the events of the Old & New Testament. The evidence is STUNNING! (Read the works of Comyns Beaumont, IF you are SERIOUS about finding out the TRUTH. Also, read Felice Vinci.)

  • Why would Netanyahu say so?

    • TimeToWakeUPAmerica

      Because Netanyahu KNOWS THE TRUTH! It’s that simple.

  • TimeToWakeUPAmerica

    “Netanyahu: Hitler didn’t want to exterminate Jews”?

    100% correct, for those who have actually done their homework. I agree with Netanyahu on this one. Perhaps he isn’t a TOTAL Nut-n-yahoo. Read the following book, and forever lay to rest the PROPAGANDA surrounding the HOLLOW-HOAX: _THE HOLOCAUST HOAX EXPOSED: DEBUNKING THE 20TH CENTURY’S BIGGEST LIE by Victor Thorn (which you can obtain for a mere $25 on Texe Marr’s website. $25 for the TRUTH. I’d call that the bargain of the 20th Century!)

  • Rilme Hakonen

    I never thought I’d defend Netanyahu, but Zeusse has bundled just about every kind of omniscience and straw-man argument into this short piece.

    The ” record is clear ” that in November 1941, Hitler didn’t really want to clear the Jews out of Germany? Zeusse seems to know that Hitler was getting ready to “spring a trap” and kill them all.

    “on 23 January 1942, Hitler in his Secret Conversations addressed Himmler sarcastically about the matter” says Zeusse. Zeusse has to add “sarcastically”, so that the reader doesn’t entertain the idea that Hitler meant what he said: he would rather the Jews left voluntarily than that they be exterminated.

    But I’m just going on what Zeusse said. I don’t know what Hitler said, in German of course, or how it should be translated (get rid of, uproot, eradicate, exterminate, kill, remove, relocate). Zeusse’s bias and dishonesty is clear in this article.

    • Army of Addicts

      The sarcasm, I believe, is meant to be placed upon the words, “I’m extraordinarily humane..”, not on the final part of the quote.

      • Rilme Hakonen

        In which case Zeusse is saying that Hitler didn’t believe himself to be “extraordinarily humane”. How could Z. know whether H. meant what he said or was being sarcastic? It still looks like bias and dishonesty to me.

        • Army of Addicts

          It looks like the author was quoting
          S. Wyman’s 1984 The Abandonment of the Jews, as stated just above the quote.