6 Key Questions about RussiaGate

The claims that Russia meddled in the 2016 U.S. election are now known as RussiaGate, in a loose reference to the Watergate scandal of the early 1970s.

In the U.S., the issue has been poisoned by profound partisanship: those who feel disenfranchised by the election of Donald Trump are trying to use RussiaGate to unseat or cripple the Trump presidency, while those who elected Trump feel RussiaGate is nothing but an attempt by the corrupt status quo to disenfranchise them.

Let’s see if we can clarify the issues with some key questions.

1. Did Russia meddle in the 2016 U.S. election? This is the entire thing in a nutshell. But this raises a second question: did Russia successfully meddle in the 2016 U.S. election? In other words, we have two investigations: one to identify verifiable, legally actionable evidence of meddling, and a second investigation into the effects of any meddling–should evidence arise that would stand up in court.

2. What federal laws or statutes were broken? This is a serious charge, and the first step in any investigation is to nail down precisely what federal laws were broken?The next step is to assemble evidence for the criminal activity that will stand up in court.

3. What standard of evidence/proof is required in a federal court to convict the accused? Is intent a necessary component of the laws that were broken? Whatprecisely constitutes burden of proof? It isn’t enough to accuse persons unknown of wrong-doing: the precise laws that were broken must be identified and the case against specific individuals must be built on verifiable evidence that will stand up in federal court.

Recall that this is not about partisan talking points–it’s about justice. Those who reckon justice counts for nothing in this investigation disqualify themselves. If justice no longer matters in America, there is no America left to defend.

4. If incontrovertible evidence of Russian meddling arose in 2016, why did the federal agencies under the Obama administration (Department of Justice, F.B.I., etc.) do nothing? While we can cook up various theories, the common-sense conclusion is 1. no federal laws were broken and/or 2) there was insufficient evidence that would stand up in court.

5. Precisely what meddling occurred? Somebody meeting with a Russian does not constitute proof of anything. rather, this is the classic witch-hunt accusation of the McCarthyite “Red Scare” of the 1950s–guilt by association: you were seen conversing with a Communist, thus you must also be a Communist–or at a minimum, you are tainted by association and thus under a cloud of suspicion that can never be cleared because no accusation of guilt in a court of law is ever made.

Guilt by association is insidious because it can’t be cleared in court. Those accused of guilt by association are not innocent until proven guilty–they are guilty until proven innocent, a proof that can never satisfy the accusers.

A precisely defined chain of verifiable actions is required to prove meddling beyond reasonable doubt. So date, all the accusations have failed to meet this most fundamental standard of evidence of wrong-doing.

As for the claim that “all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies concur that blah-blah blah”– Where precisely is the evidence? If there is no verifiable evidence and no chain of events that can be substantiated with hard evidence that will stand up in federal court, then all we really have is accusations of guilt by association, i.e. a witch-hunt.

6. What evidence supports the claim that Russian meddling actually influenced the election? The claim that Russians hacked the Democratic National Committee emails has fallen apart for lack of evidence; it now seems clear that the hack was an inside-the-DNC whistleblowing incident.

As for the claim that Russian meddling negatively impacted the campaign of Hillary Clinton: the most damaging bits were all verifiably accurate in the public record:

— The Podesta emails were in fact Podesta emails.

— The video of candidate Clinton apparently collapsing on the curb was not fabricated; it was a video recorded by an amateur bystander.

— Reports of pay-to-play and other unsavory activities within the Clinton Foundation predate the election by years.

— Candidate Clinton’s comments on “deplorables” were her own words.

Again, standards of evidence and proof of guilt of federal crimes require a precise chain of events and actions for which there is evidence that will stand up in federal court, , i.e. evidence that will persuade a jury or federal judge and that can withstand cross-examination and the inquiries of experts hired by the defense.

Given the absolute paucity of actionable, verifiable evidence to date, RussiaGate is so far nothing but a series of unsupported accusations of guilt by association, i.e. a witch-hunt. This is why some in the mainstream media have characterized the whole thing as a “nothing-burger.”

Compare RussiaGate to Watergate. Watergate was always about compiling evidence of activities that violated federal laws. People who broke federal laws were identified, evidence was compiled and presented in a court of law where the accused were able to defend themselves against an indictment presented by federal prosecutors. Some were acquitted, many were convicted, others plea-bargained a conviction with a reduced sentence.

Those making accusations in RussiaGate must now put up or shut up: either present the evidence that supports federal indictments, or confess to the pursuit of a witch hunt, i.e. unsubstantiated accusations of guilt by association. Anything less than the presentation of actionable evidence that leads to indictments and convictions is not justice–it’s just another witch-hunt that besmirches everyone who participates in the witch-hunt. 

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • WillDippel

    Here is an interesting history of Russia’s attempted moves toward jointing the very organization that was created to protect Europe from Soviet communism:


    It’s really no wonder that Russia has become increasingly concerned about NATO expansionism into the Eastern European bloc over the past decade and a half.

  • ICFubar

    Of course CH Smith is dead nuts right in his article here but the intent of Russiagate is multiple. By far the most important one is to change the subject from the DNC emails which open up multiple cans of worms that strike at the very heart of the criminality of those who run America and the rest of the west. The second purpose is to attack Trump and his administration in a feeble attempt to make something large enough stick to the wall so that the agencies of Continuity of Agenda, in this case the DOJ, can pursue some legal channel to erase the ‘mistake’ the America people made by electing Trump. Other by products, such as the demonization of President Putin and Russia as actionable by this accusation are also a part of this planned campaign, ergo the newest sanctions. This will also play out on as many fronts as one can imagine in other areas of deep state concern such as the internet and information platforms in general. The powers in Washington have built their latest gambit and are running hard with it before it loses steam and another gambit emerges to take its place as a diversion to the prime importance of the metastasizing cover up of the DNC emails and all that they reveal about the true state of the American nation today.

    • Alicejdahlberg

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !pa344d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash344MarketGreenGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!pa344l..,……

  • Zartan

    First … There is nothing “ever” going to come of Russia Gate, because it is profanely Stupid. Russia is not going to admit it “did anything” and cannot be made to testify. Therefore, it is a worthless topic. Second, all of this He said She Said … Hacker, Whacker … Whatever, nonsense, can go on forever because there is no meat in this story it is all a fabrication to keep the sheep in slumber!

    Now, a More interesting Story … Why is PUTIN`S name “PUT IN” sounds fake, sounds like someone is pissing on me and telling me its raining! How did this lowly KGB agent become a Billionaire? And, Why In Almighty Gods Name did this Acclaimed Chess Player and Strategic thinker Pass on Greece? Was He Drunk? Now, who is paying the PUT IN , because it seems obvious to me that with a PUT IN, Russia is wide open for a US/NATO invasion. I hear 8 Russian Generals were recently fired, ( I wonder why?) and Putin seems to be blowing smoke to cover his stench?

    Finally, a more interesting story : ” Does Putin work for the CIA?” This would also explain why Putin allows his military to be target practice for US and NATO POP SHOTS! I SMELL A SKUNK AND ITS NAME IS PUTIN.