Why 2017 Is Like 1969

A deeply polarizing new president, a disastrously misguided official narrativethat the political Establishment doggedly supports despite a damning lack of evidence, and an economy teetering on the edge of recession–and worse.

Sound familiar? Welcome to 1969 redux. The similarities between the crises unfolding in 1969 and the present-day crises are not just skin-deep–they’re systemic.

Consider the basic parallels.

1. Nixon was if anything more polarizing than Trump. If there was any politician Democrats loved to hate, it was Nixon. Yet Nixon won a close race against an Establishment Democrat, at least partly because he ran as a “peace candidate” and because he spoke to the Silent Majority who disagreed with the nation’s direction. The Silent Majority was mocked and ridiculed by the mainstream media as racist, close-minded deplorables.

2. The Democratic Party had become the Establishment bastion of war-mongering. The Democratic White House had been obscuring its devastating strategic and tactical miscalculations behind a slick PR campaign and a pervasive and often illegal program of suppressing dissenters and whistleblowers.

3. At the behest of the Establishment, an immense propaganda machinery had been running full-tilt to paper over foreign-policy failures and tragedies (including but not limited to the Vietnam War). In 2017, this immense propaganda machine is focused on discrediting the Trump presidency by unearthing or fabricating evidence of collusion with our default Bad Guy, Russia.

4. The political Establishment had decided to tamp down discontent with the Vietnam War by borrowing vast sums to pay for both “guns” (the war) and “butter” (the Great Society social welfare programs). Paying for the war and a military capable of fighting one-and-a-half other wars (at that time, the Pentagon was geared to fight 2.5 wars) would have required some sacrifice in domestic spending, and that would have further inflamed popular resistance to the Vietnam War. The expedient (and predictably disastrous) choice was to ramp up deficit spending so no domestic sacrifice was needed to pay the crushingly high costs of the Vietnam conflict. In 2017, U.S. public debt basically doubled during the Obama/congressional guns and butter borrowing spree from $10 trillion to $20 trillion.

5. The U.S. economy had by most measures topped out in 1966 or 1967, and by 1969 the veneer of permanently rising prosperity was shredding. The first wave of globalization washed ashore as our enemies and allies in World War II had built powerful export economies that had the advantage of cheap currencies via a vis the U.S. dollar.

6. China was a potentially destabilizing force that threatened U.S. hegemony in the Pacific. In 1969, China was deep in the chaotic throes of the Cultural Revolution which decimated its educated and leadership classes and destroyed much of its physical cultural heritage. In 2017, China’s monumental economic growth is losing steam even as its designs to establish hegemony in the South China Sea increasingly threaten its Asian neighbors’ security.

7. The Cold War with the U.S.S.R. was heating up in numerous places around the world, including the Mideast and Southeast Asia.

8. Beneath the relative stability of the Cold War geopolitical stand-off, the global economy and social order was changing in profound ways. Technological advances were poised to fatally disrupt many established and supposedly permanent centers of power. Trade and capital flows were shifting in ways that undermined the Bretton Woods currency order, and social/cultural revolutions were spreading around the globe like wildfire.

9. The mainstream media parroted the official narratives and “facts” until the counter-evidence was too overwhelming to ignore.

And here we are again, in so many ways. A deeply polarized nation, angry over rising expectations that no longer match economic realities, an Establishment that doubles down on failed policies and narratives rather than admit catastrophic errors of judgment, a political order that pursues public relations and “signaling” over substance, a political/ financial Elite that chooses political and economic expediency, kicking the can down the road rather than tackle thorny problems head-on, a stagnating economy that is poised on the precipice of profound technological and social disruption, and a global order that is fraying and coming apart at the seams.

The decade following 1969 was one of multiple global disruptions in the political, social, energy, geopolitical, currency and economic spheres. The difference now is that the buffers that existed in 1969 are now paper-thin, and so the potential downside of disruption and instability is much, much greater.

We Do These Things Because They’re Easy: Our All-Consuming Dependence on Debt

Our Financial Buffers Are Thinning 

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jadan

    Nixon was not polarizing like Trump. He claimed his “silent majority”. And that was……what? The middle class, Smith. Trump is a post-Reagan polemicist, a pure poseur and apologist for the 1%. History does not repeat itself. Nixon’s electoral mandate was legitimate. Trump is the product of a profoundly corrupt and unaccountable computerized electoral apparatus. He does not represent the majority of American voters because we know Americans have no passion to defend the rights of landlords and the financial class. We have no provable basis for saying who won the election because there is no way to do any sort of meaningful recount. The system is failing and a profound crisis is in our very near future, but we don’t step in the same river twice. American capitalism was not threatened in 1969. In these latter days, it is. Democratic socialism is the only viable future, but these slimy “conservatives”, whom Trump represents, the billionaire activists club, will not concede their control and go gently on to the ash heap of history. The free market bullshit that survived FDR will not survive this fool, Donald Trump.

    • brenrod

      brainwashed due to a lack of diversity in your info sources

  • WillDippel

    Here is an interesting look at the bias evident in American media coverage of Donald Trump’s recent visit to Europe:


    It is becoming increasingly apparent that American voters who are truly interested in an unbiased opinion of Donald Trump’s performance have no choice but to go to the original source of his comments to ensure that they are avoiding mainstream (and not so mainstream) media propagandizing.

    • jadan

      Poor little Donald, he’s such an innocent victim! Boo hoo! He’s got the most regressive crackpot agenda only the Koch Brothers can love. That’s not being fairly reported at all! I’d say the media is being nice to this blatant liar. Blame the media is an effective strategy to distract from his disastrous policy proposals.

      • brenrod

        “I would say……”
        yes, you did say that hillary would win by a landslide because you news and polls told you so…. I would say you learned nothing and are due to repeat your errors.

  • 789

    R. Nixon invited Vladi B. to visit him in White House and asked him to join the new world order; is the yellow-headed freak-monster going to invite Vladi P. to Washington ?

    Rich Nixon implemented more leftist policies than Lyndon B.J. or the Libs could dream of. Kicked Taiwan out of the UN; established EPA; implemented wage/price control; came out with a budget that increased spending, deficit, debt; opened to China and started it on the road that led to what China is today

    Is the yellow-headed freak-monster going to implement policies that the Obama wouldn’t have dared to contemplate ?