French intelligence service piles on with more anti-Assad nonsense–here’s why it is BS

By Meryl Nass, M.D.  Dr. Nass is  a board-certified internist and a biological warfare epidemiologist and expert in anthrax. Nass publishes Anthrax Vaccine.

“France’s foreign ministry says deadly sarin gas used in a chemical attack in Syria this month that killed 87 people “bears the signature” of President Bashar Assad’s government.

A six-page report by French intelligence services claims the nerve agent came from hidden stockpiles of chemical weapons that Damascus was supposed to have destroyed under an U.S.- and Russian-brokered deal in 2013.”

Here is what you should be aware of as you sift this latest news:

1.  Assad gave up 1300 tons (2,600,000 pounds) of his chemical weapons in 2013-14.  They were moved out of Syria, loaded on ships, and destroyed by portable shipboard factories far offshore.  The process lent itself to skullduggery.

And Damascus was not given the option of destroying its own weapons, nor was it even considered safe to do so in a war zone.  They had to be handed over to the West.

How many countries and people had access to Syria’s sarin and mustard gas during that process?  Was any sarin withheld from destruction?  (We should more realistically ask, how much was withheld and who got it?)  Who might subsequently have been given some of that material?

2.  Since chemical and biological weapons may leave a chemical or genetic signature, and since a major advantage of such weapons is the difficulty of identifying a perpetrator, the smart players do their best to create chem/bio weapons that leave the signature of someone else.

3.  If you know the chemical signature of a chemical or biological weapon, even if you cannot obtain someone else’s material, you may be able to reverse engineer a specific signature and impute an attack to your enemy.

4.  Seymour Hersh and others have noted that weapons from Gaddafi’s stockpile were sent from Libya through Turkey to Syria to be given to anti-Assad rebel forces, in a complicated maneuver engineered by the CIA.  Sarin was alleged to have been found by police, who arrested al-Nusra rebels in Turkey with 2 kg. of sarin.  Using Gaddifi’s arms gave the CIA plausible deniability of involvement.

It should not be lost on the reader that anyone giving sarin to Syrian ‘rebels’ would expect its use to be attributed to Assad.

5.  The UN report on chemical weapons in 2013 did not blame Syria, and the UN’s Carla del Ponte described evidence favoring the rebels as the perpetrators.

6.  Since no Syrian sarin attacks have ever been demonstrated conclusively to be due to Assad or to anyone else (rumors and claims abound, but definite proof has been elusive), France’s claim that the recent sarin is from Assad because it matched sarin from an earlier attack is utter nonsense, since we don’t know the source of the earlier sarin signature.

7.  The French intelligence service authored this report.  And the US intelligence services authored the 2003 report of Iraq’s WMD, and claimed the 2013 sarin attacks were due to Assad (without proof, read the report here).  US and UK intelligence services had something to do with the Trump “golden showers” dossier of trash.

These intelligence services were all carrying out their missions, which sadly have become propaganda, not intelligence. 

8.  There was no motive for Assad to use chemical weapons in 2013, and no motive today.  Instead, strategically, he had much to lose.

Read what a former State Department insider had to say about the unlikelihood Assad used chemical weapons in 2013, in an article in the Atlantic.

9.   When you consider the background to the claims about Syria’s chemical weapons, the series of stories blaming Assad for attacking his people with sarin this month make less and less sense.  Instead, it seems we are reliving Judith Miller’s series of NY Times stories that provided the drumbeat to war in Iraq, in 2002-3. We should not be fooled again.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Marko

    Thank you for making these important points , which war machine propagandists like HRW avoid mentioning as if it would be fatal to do so.

    For all the noise HRW makes about the chlorine attacks , they only talk as if Assad alone could be the perpetrator. This even as we know that several years ago al Nusrah took control of the only chlorine plant in Syria , with a stockyard of chlorine cylinders amounting to some 40 tons , IIRC. They thus also had access to all of the gas transfer and cylinder filling equipment they would need to produce small , medium , or large cylinders of chlorine for use in their false-flag activity. Also , with a chlorine plant , by definition they also had the ability to generate virtually unlimited supplies of HCl , and if you combine that with their known large stockpiles of permanganate ( KMnO4 ) , they also had the capability to make “binary” chlorine weapons ( HCl + KMnO4) of exactly the sort that have been repeatedly blamed on Assad.

    Given this known propensity of the rebels to accumulate these chlorine-related raw materials , the chief suspect in any chlorine attack should be them , not Assad.

    The deck is so obviously stacked against Assad , I’m stunned that Ken Roth can make his sweeping accusations while maintaining a straight face. As liars go , he’s a real professional , no doubt.

    • Juliecperkins

      My last paycheck was $22500 for working 12 hours a week online.Start earning $97/hour by working online from your home for few hours each day with GOOGLE… Get regular payments on weekly basis… All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time… Read more here
      !wr326c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs326TopGlobal/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr326u:……

  • oncefiredbrass

    We all know the Polling is Screwed! If it came down to a debate on whether to Invade Syria it wouldn’t pass muster – but the Wildcard is Trump says he doesn’t telegraph his Military Decisions, so basically we could have 50 Thousand Troops in there before the Lazy MSM even Noticed! It is Obvious this was a False Flag, anybody with just a bit of common sense could see this a mile off!

    • Lynettemcarr

      My last paycheck was $22500 for working 12 hours a week online.Start earning $97/hour by working online from your home for few hours each day with GOOGLE… Get regular payments on weekly basis… All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time… Read more here
      !wr535c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs535TopLine/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr535u:…….

    • I commenced freelancing over online world, participating in some rudimentary tasks which entirely needed a pc and consequently access to internet together with I am more happy than before… 6 months get passed on when i begun this and consequently i had income full amount of of $36k… Basically I generate eighty bucks every single hr and work for three to four hrs many of the days.And big plus with this is that you can keep control of valuable time while you work and so for how long as you like and you acquire a take-home pay week by week. —->>>LEARN Better About That here-> http://olaurl.com/15cpx

      ururrr

  • Adam Larson

    The hidden story in plain view here: France, UK, do NOT say the sarin found here matches Syria’s surrendered stocks. INSTEAD, they say it matches sarin used in 2013 attacks. Implication: it doesn’t mach both kinds, which are different kinds, or they’d say it was an all-around match. So, the sarin used in 2013 never matched Syria’s stocks, as we were assured, Those would be pue, colorless, odorless, like water – military grade. The nid used in attacks had impurities that made it yellow-colored, foul-smelling, and caustic to the eyes and lungs. That’s “kitchen sarin,” in attacks only terrorists had a motive for. And this latest is being pinned on Syria on the basis that it used the same kind of sarin, specifically, that (terrorists not) Syria used in Saraqeb, just a few miles north of here, back in 2013.

  • Adam Larson

    Also, it seems to me, as the terrorists set up their false story, they pulled a collective Postol and read the wind exactly backwards. oops! http://libyancivilwar.blogspot.com/2017/05/idlib-chemical-massacre-when-and-where.html https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b0394176f5e2cb54f317d1135668f47228f8ace14d7fceb80ea8365bf8f26a1c.jpg