Mad-Dog Mattis Going Rabid

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org

On Monday, April 25th, the AP headlined, “US general in Afghanistan suggests Russia arming the Taliban” and reported that U.S. Pentagon chief James “Mad Dog” Mattis was accusing Russia of violating the sovereignty of unnamed nation(s) and was supplying weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan — the very same group that the U.S. back in 1979 had begun arming in Pakistan so that the Taliban would invade Afghanistan and lure Soviet forces into Afghanistan, so as to make the Soviets “bleed” there, as the U.S. itself had bled in its Vietnam War. The U.S. National Security Advisor at that time went to Pakistan and rallied the Taliban there by saying “Your cause is right, and God is on your side!”

Mattis was also quoted in this news-report as saying, “We’re going to have to confront Russia where what they’re doing is contrary to international law or denying the sovereignty of other countries.”

The United States has, in fact, invaded Syria — routinely violating the sovereignty of that country. It’s aggression, in order to overthrow Syria’s President, Bashar al-Assad, who is allied with Russia. The U.S. also has been protecting any jihadist group in Syria that cooperates with Al Qaeda to overthrow Assad. (The U.S. never abandoned the Cold War, but Russia did; and, ever since Russia did, in 1991, the U.S. government has secretly had a plan in place to bring every country that was allied with or part of the Soviet Union, except for Russia itself, into NATO or otherwise under control by the American aristocracy, and finally to take over Russia itself.) The U.S. has even preferred to help ISIS defeat Assad, over helping Assad defeat ISIS. Syria consequently requested Russia to assist in defending the survival of its internationally-recognized-as-legal government, so as to prevent its downfall and replacement by the jihadist forces that the U.S. and its Saudi, Qatari and Turkish allies have been trying to replace by imposing a fundamentalist-Sunni, Al Qaeda approved, regime. Whereas the presence of Russia’s military in Syria was requested by the legal government and is therefore legal, America’s is not — the U.S. is instead officially an “invader” there — and yet Mattis is saying that the U.S. will impose international law against Russia, for vague allegations by Mattis of Russia’s “denying the sovereignty of other countries” — which the U.S. routinely does, and which it did excruciatingly in Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, and Syria since 2011, just to mention a few of the nations that the U.S. has recently destroyed. The U.S. government has long been in the regime-change business, especially to replace any ally of Russia, by an enemy of Russia.

However, Mattis, rabid as he is, is less rabid than is U.S. President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor, H.R. McMaster. On April 13th, Eli Lake of Bloomberg News bannered “Trump Said No to Troops in Syria. His Aides Aren’t So Sure.” He reported that,

“Trump’s top advisers have failed to reach consensus on the Islamic State strategy. The White House and administration officials say Secretary of Defense James Mattis, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford and General Joseph Votel, who is in charge of U.S. Central Command, oppose sending more conventional forces into Syria. Meanwhile, White House senior strategist Stephen Bannon has derided McMaster to his colleagues as trying to start a new Iraq War, according to these sources. … Two sources told me one plan would envision sending up to 50,000 troops. … Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, opposed sending conventional forces into a complicated war zone, where they would be targets of al Qaeda, the Islamic State, Iran and Russia. In Flynn’s brief tenure, he supported a deal with Russia to work together against the Islamic State and al Qaeda’s Syria affiliate, similar to a bargain Obama’s secretary of state, John Kerry’s tried and failed to seal with Moscow.”

The reason that Kerry “failed to seal [the deal] with Moscow” is that the deal was reached on 9 September 2016 by Kerry and Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, but was destroyed by Obama eight days later by his bombing Syria’s army at Der Zor to allow ISIS to overrun the place.

Trump is taking over where Obama left off.

Russian Television reported (and U.S. ‘news’ media refused to report) U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, on April 6th, two days after the alleged sarin attack, as essentially demanding Putin’s capitulation, regarding the Syrian war:

“’It is very important that the Russian government consider carefully their support for Bashar al-Assad.’ Tillerson added. Asked if the US will lead a regime change effort in Syria, Tillerson said that ‘those steps are underway.’”

Russians got the message, even if Americans did not. In other words, they know that the Trump Administration is continuing what had originally been the Obama Administration’s objective, prior to Russia’s entry into the war on Assad’s side on 30 September 2015: regime-change in Syria. The Trump Administration is apparently willing to go to war against Russia in order to remove Assad and replace him with a leader who is supported by the U.S., Sauds, and America’s other allies in the war to replace Syria’s existing government.

It’s not only Mattis who is “rabid.” So is his President, Trump; and, if the even more rabid H.R. McMaster gets his way, so too will be the entire world.

Pleasing America’s “military-industrial complex” is hard to do, but Trump’s Administration is trying hard to out-do its predecessors, at that task.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Taras77

    apologies but I posted a comment earlier to this article-IMHO, it applies equally here: (pertains to possible influence on mattis by war criminal wolfowitz):

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/04/american-intelligence-officials-mattis-no-doubt-stance-alleged-syrian-cw-smacks-politicized-intelligence.html

  • Army of Addicts

    When Mattis said Russia was violating international law, did he say it with a straight face?

    • Janetjclark

      My last paycheck was $22500 for working 12 hours a week online.Start earning $97/hour by working online from your home for few hours each day with GOOGLE… Get regular payments on weekly basis… All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time… Read more here
      !wr356c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs356TopLabs/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr356u:……

  • awb22

    Once again, Zuesse fails to acknowledge his zionist loyalty to Soros, and by association his complicity with the previous administration in the Ukraine. He then has the audacity to suggest Trump is taking up the mantle, when in fact, he has done no such thing.

    Zuesse even goes so far as to quote Trump as saying “No” to ground troops in Syria, but apparently he’s responsible for the opinions of his staff, as well, and even former staff.

    Is there no limit to Zuesse’s disdain for the spanner wrench in the globalists plan for world dominion which Trump represents? Apparently, not!

    Please return your journalism card to the rubbish bin, Eric.

  • ICFubar

    Might makes right in the minds of most of the Trump administrations top staff including the head baffoon himself it seems. They are backing themselves into a corner with their brinkmanship but hopefully the Russians will allow them some sort of escape route where these jerks can claim victory in defeat. Or maybe Trump et al will just tip the table over and blow the whole planet up using nuclear weaponry to do the job? I would not want to bet against Trump and company’s total insanity.

    • If үοu arе iπ ne℮Ꮷ for e᙮τra ρаᶌrnent ͺп tᏂe ranɡe ౦f $5O to $3୦0 dɑӏlγ foᴦ d೦ɪռց ѕimрle w૦rᴋ ᴑvеr iπτerϖet ᴏո уσυr ϲ௦mϱuτeᴦ fr௦m hᴑme ſᴑr Ӡ−4 h ℮аcᏂ ԁay tհ℮n try τhᎥƽ http://deliciousurl.com//1s

      gfrtd

    • I tried freelancing over web, through some necessary job opportunities which definitely demanded your working computer as well as having access to net and additionally Now I am more delighted than ever… a few months get passed on when i first began this and i had residual income total of 36,000 dollars… Normally I generate eighty usd each and every hr as well as work for three to 4 hours most of the days.And great thing about this is that one could manage time whenever you work and for how long as you like and you earn a take-home pay week by week. —->>>LEARN A lot more Regarding It here->http://shrty.link/VWFexZ

      fxdfd