Debunking the French Report on Syrian Chemical Weapons

The French government released a report blaming the Syrian government for this month’s chemical weapons incident.

The report states:

According  to  the  intelligence  obtained  by  the  French  services,  the  process  of  synthesizing  sarin,  developed  by  the  Scientific  Studies  and  Research  Centre  (SSRC)  and employed by the Syrian armed forces and security services, involves the use of hexamine as a stabilizer.

***

The  presence  of  the  same  chemical  compounds  in  the  environmental  samples collected  during  the  attacks  on  Khan  Sheikhoun  on  4 April 2017  and  on  Saraqib  on 29 April 2013  has  therefore  been  formally  confirmed  by  France.  The  sarin  present  in  the munitions used on 4 April was  produced using the same manufacturing process as that used during the sarin attack perpetrated by the Syrian regime in Saraqib. Moreover, the presence of  hexamine  indicates  that  this  manufacturing  process  is  that  developed  by  the  Scientific Studies and Research Centre for the Syrian regime.

Sounds convincing, right?

But the report falls apart upon closer scrutiny …

Specifically, the head of the United Nations’ team investigating the possible use of chemical warfare in Syria (Åke Sellström) wrote an email to MIT rocket scientist Ted Postol in 2014 stating:

Hexamine … is a product simple to get hold of and in no way conclusively points to the [Syrian] government.

In addition, hexamine found in samples may be derived from other sources for example, explosives.

Sellstrom-Postol

(I blacked out Postol’s email address to protect his privacy; as I did with personal information in the email below.)

This week, Washington’s Blog wrote the following email to Dr.  Sellström seeking confirmation:

The Washington Post quotes French officials as saying that analysis of sarin from Khan Sheikhoun shows the presence of hexamine, indicating that the sarin was produced by the Syrian government:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/samples-from-syrias-deadly-sarin-attack-bear-assadssignature-says-france/2017/04/26/af5d47e0-2a5d-11e7-86b7-5d31b5fdc114_story.html?utm_term=.dc5df76866af

However, my understanding is that it is easy to acquire hexamine, and  so the presence of the substance does not indicate state-sponsored manufacture.  I also understand that hexamine is a common byproduct from explosives.  Is that right?

Dr. Sellström responded:

It is really a question of the meaning of the word indicating. The presence of hexamine could, indeed, indicate that the source is the government. Leaving out who actually used it.

But it could also indicate a lot of other things, like someone using the same recipe for example

Sellstrom-wbIn other words, the lead UN investigator is saying that the presence of hexamine could prove that:

(1) The Syrian government did use sarin

(2) The rebels got a hold of old stocks of government-produced sarin, and then used it themselves

(3) Someone reverse-engineered the sarin formula previously used by the government and created their own new sarin

(4) Something else altogether (e.g. that the hexamine came from every day explosives, was otherwise introduced from other sources, or perhaps the evidence was altogether fudged for political purposes)

The French report also claims:

France  assesses that the theory of an attack by the armed [rebel] groups using a neurotoxic agent on 4 April is not credible. France has no information confirming the possession of sarin by these groups.

That’s downright silly, given that it was long ago shown that the rebels do possess chemical weapons such as sarin.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • andrea

    What about that eye-opening article you posted earlier? Wasn’t it already debunking FRA/US theories?
    Why did you delete that?

  • freewheelinfranklin543

    Hexamine heating tablets to heat up your rations. Hexamine the main ingredient in the military explosive RDX.

    • DDTea

      Hexamine is not an “ingredient” in RDX; it is nitrated to make RDX/HMX. They’re different molecules and are separated from one another during synthesis.

      Reference:

      Hale, G.C. “The Nitration of Hexamethylenetetramine.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925, 47 (11), pp. 2754-2763. DOI: 10.1021/ja01688a017

  • imbroglio

    Intel Vets Slam Trump’s ‘Chemical Weapons’ Fraud in Syria — http://21stcenturywire.com/2017/04/27/intel-vets-slam-trumps-chemical-weapon-fraud-in-syria/

  • gamesjon

    I don’t have any reason to think this even might have happened, but I think it is something people should not forget in relation to possibility #2 & #3. If I remember correctly the UN OPCW delivered Syria’s chemical weapon stockpile to the United States military to be destroyed, but upon confirmation of delivery to the U.S. wasn’t that actual destruction process entirely in the hands & under the sole supervision of the U.S. itself?

    • lf уoυ aᴦe l౦σĸinց ſor extrα inᴄoᴍe averɑᶃing Ƽ0-ЗOഠ dסIlarƽ oπ ᏧaiƖy ᖯαsis ſ೦r d૦inɡ aπ ൦nIіոе j૦b ſᴦ๐m үouг c๐uϲһ аt hංm℮ f໐ᴦ 3⁃4 հ ℮טeгy Ꮷaყ тheп reaԁ mංre heᴦе http://deliciousurl.com//1r

      dfgd

  • Todd Millions

    Hexamine is also used in plastics- as a part of stabilizing and/or flexicant additives. With extensive recycling of these products-traces would be widely detectable.
    Not mentioning such uses would make this a “Frenched Report”. Composed in Tel Avia?
    I should be more interested in the disappeared recent reports of Sulphur in French power reactor steel.
    The revision of carbon levels in these abortions, in fact goes back to the 1980’s-publicly.
    Makes it easier to suddenly spread the neutron enbrittled and neutron emitting scrap around enough to be everyone else’s problem as well.
    Does this report make any mention of this singular only semite(apparently) ability to deal with sarin ,with no more than a dust mask and sandals? This could explain why the zykon was such a flop.

    • I started out freelancing over on line world, participating in some fundamental assignments which only requisite a desktop together with usage of internet and Now I am more joyful than before… a few months get passed since i commenced this and i had residual income full amount of of 36 thousand dollars… Usually I generate 80 bucks each hr and also work for 3 to 4 hrs most of the times.And great advantage of this is exactly that you could keep control of valuable time while you work and for how long as you like but you still earn a paycheck each and every week. —->>>LEARN Even more Regarding It here->http://shrty.link/VWFexZ

      hgfhr

    • I began freelancing over web, via doing some fundamental work which typically wanted your working personal computer together with usage of net and consequently I am more joyful than ever… six months time get passed on since i began this and therefore i received cash full amount of of 36,000 dollars… Usually I earn 80 dollars each and every hour and even work for three to four hrs majority of the days.And beauty of this is exactly that you can keep control of time while you work and so for how long as you like and you get a paycheck in one week. —->>>LEARN Extra About This here-> http://b1z.org/38c

      ghfddsy

    • DDTea

      Because Sarin is non-persistent and, depending on weather conditions, may be totally dispersed or degraded within 30 minutes. This is common knowledge, and relates to Sarin’s tactical usage in clearing enemy fortifications to allow friendly troops to advance.

      http://sc-ems.com/images/persist.jpg

  • DDTea

    Hexamine isn’t a known decomposition product, byproduct, or significant impurity from any explosive. Without discrediting Dr. Sellstrom in general, he appears to be incorrect on this point. If we’re searching for truth, we need to reject specious possibilities whenever we have sufficient evidence to do so. And in on this particular issue, we do. See references for more detail.

    Of the possibilities you mention, (1) and (2) are the most likely.

    [1] Cosgrove, J.D.; Owen, A.J. “The Thermal Decomposition of 1,3,5 Trinitro Hexahydro 1,3,5 Triazine (RDX)-Part 1: The Products and Physical Parameters” Combustion and Flame, Vol 22, Issue 1, Feb 1974, pp. 13-18 . DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(74)90005-4
    [2] Cosgrove, J. D.; Owen, A.J. “The thermal decomposition of 1,3,5 trinitro hexahydro 1,3,5 triazine (RDX)—part II: The effects of the products”Combustion and Flame, Vol 22, Issue 1, Feb 1974, pp. 19-22. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(74)90005-4
    [3] A.C. T. van Duin, J. Oxgaard, and W.A. Goddard III. “Thermal decomposition of RDX from reactive molecular dynamics” J. Chem. Phys. 122, 054502 (2005).
    [4] Hale, G.C. “The Nitration of Hexamethylenetetramine.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1925, 47 (11), pp. 2754-2763. DOI: 10.1021/ja01688a017