Are We Really that Divided?

If there is any statement about politics in America that qualifies as as a truism accepted by virtually everyone, left, right or independent, it’s that America is a deeply divided nation. But is this really true?

Like everyone else, I too accepted that the line between Hillary supporters and detractors, and Trump supporters and detractors, was about as “either/or” as real life gets.

But are we really that divided? A fascinating 55-minute lecture by historian Michael Kulikowski entitled The Accidental Suicide of the Roman Empire has made me question this consensus certitude.

Maybe the real driver of this division is divisive language–more specifically, language that is designed to drive a wedge between us. In other words, maybe the divisions are an intentional consequence of the language we’re using.

Kulikowski makes a number of nuanced arguments in his talk, but his primary point is that the late-stage Roman Empire collapsed partly as an unintended consequence of rhetorical binaries, polarizing rhetoric that lumped an extremely diverse Imperial populace into false binaries: Roman or Barbarian, Christian or heretic, and so on.

The actual lived reality was completely different from these artificial either-or binary classifications. As Kulikowski explains (and anyone who has read a modern history of late-stage Rome will know this from other accounts), many “Roman generals” were “Barbarian” by birth, and the boundary between “Roman citizen” and “Barbarian” was porous on purpose.

Rome had prospered by ensuring the boundary was porous (not counting slaves, of course). An impoverished young man from the hinterlands could join the Roman military and achieve a stable income and Roman citizenship. (Women could advance through marrying into a Roman-citizen family–even one that was “Barbarian” until recently.)

By Imperial decree in the 3rd Century A.D., any free person inside the boundaries of Imperial Rome was declared a Roman citizen. So numerous people of a variety of ethnicities may have been born outside the boundaries (i.e. Barbarian) became as “Roman” as any native born Roman in terms of their obligations to pay taxes and rights to judicial review.

This social/economic upward mobility was a key “secret sauce” of Rome’s enduring success.

So why the sudden fatal attraction to completely false polarizing binaries?Kulikowski makes the case that deploying these rhetorical devices–polarizing binariesserved the political purposes of warring elites within the Imperial aristocracy.

For example, one sure-fire way to undermine a political challenger was to label him as a “Barbarian.” Even though he might have served in the Roman army from his youth, his political opponent could transform him into a “bad guy” by virtue of his being born a non-Roman. Sound familiar? (Hint: try “deplorable”.)

There is a self-destructive, self-reinforcing dynamic in this polarizing rhetoric:though it served the political interests of individual members of the elite, it did so at the cost of the entire polity, which was poisoned by these false binaries that then developed into dominant narratives.

Hence Kulikowski’s startling conclusion: Rome didn’t “die of natural causes”–it accidentally committed suicide once its political elites embracing polarizing binaries as political weapons. These weapons seemed targeted to their users, but the rhetorical narratives spread like a deadly virus through the empire, helping to trigger collapse of the Imperial core.

Bloomberg-BusinessWeek published a major multiple-part story in September of 2016 prior to the election entitled One Nation Divisible: The American Electorate.

The story repeats the truism of America being a divided nation, but my take-away was not the either-or binaries accepted by the mainstream and alternative media alike– my take-away was a newfound appreciation for the incredible diversity in America, not just ethnically, but geographically, demographically, and in every other measure of complex diversity.

How could a nation of such astounding diversity be artificially cleaved into polarizing binaries? The short answer is that it cannot: the polarizing binaries are artificial rhetorical devices, completely out of touch with the nuanced, complex reality of a diverse populace with widely diverse opinions on a wide spectrum of political topics.

My conclusion is that we should be alert to the great distance between these politically useful but systemically poisonous polarizing binaries and the complex and dynamic realities of the American populace.

We would also benefit from recognizing the artificiality and self-serving nature of these polarizing binaries, and be alert to the false and destructive narratives and teleologies they generate.

For more on narratives and teleologies, please read my recent essay The Deep State’s Dominant Narratives and Authority Are Crumbling.

We’ve already witnessed the toxic weeds of polarizing binaries spreading across the political landscape, choking out real-world narratives: diverse populations are being demonized as “deplorables,” “racists,” “evil,” and so on. So many of our choices are false choices based on polarizing binaries. For example– how many voters would have championed an alternative to Hillary or Trump? If given a choice, would 60% of the voters have chosen someone other than the two party candidates? (Hint: Bernie Sanders is the most popular politico in America, according to recent polls.)

Identity politics is another rhetorical device designed to consolidate diverse populaces into politically useful (to the elites jockeying for power) binary blocks: you’re either “for us” (and good) or “against everything good” (bad, evil, racist, etc.)

If we don’t challenge these poisonous polarizing binaries, they may well trigger the accidental suicide of our polity. THe saying is the demographics is destiny; the same can be said of the language we use to divide or unite people of good faith who are sick of the parasitic, predatory elites that are plundering the nation.


If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via patreon.com.

Check out both of my new books, Inequality and the Collapse of Privilege ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print) and Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform ($3.95 Kindle, $8.95 print, $5.95 audiobook) For more, please visit the OTM essentials website.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • WillDippel

    As shown in this article, there is one significant economic factor that will impact the United States over the coming decades:

    http://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2017/03/despair-in-white-middle-aged-america.html

    The so-called recovery since the end of the Great Recession has left millions of Americans without hope.

    • Sandrapyates

      My last paycheck was $22500 for working 12 hours a week online.Start earning $97/hour by working online from your home for few hours each day with GOOGLE… Get regular payments on weekly basis… All you need is a computer, internet connection and a litte free time… Read more here
      !wr377c:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs377SmartSocial/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr377u:…….

  • CNDFOX

    Hint: Bernie Sanders is the most popular politico in America, according to recent polls. – from author

    Anyone who has paid any attention to our political scene in recent decades understands one key thing. That a “poll” or “poll’s” like that mean absolutely nothing if that individual isn’t currently vying to be become POTUS. The problem with this nation – to me – isn’t the polarizing of people who are educated, intelligent or reasonable. It’s the polarization of those who still live in non-diverse, homogenous, often rural (and some suburban) communities of our nation who when you look at the education statistics and ratings – just are not very smart. And the suburban areas are characterized by what? White flight into segregated communities with people who want to be part of – but never will be – one of the wealthy1%. Many times these people get wrapped up in their traditional, supposedly religious little worlds and fail to recognize the ever changing face and factors of real life in the year 2017. Hillary did misspeak when she labeled a certain group of people as deplorable when in actuality she should have been aiming at their collective intelligence levels. Because in many cases those who strongly supported Trump… those levels truly were deplorable. Don’t believe me? Take a good strong look at where the majority of southern and midwestern states stand in our nation’s educational rankings. But what is most upsetting to me is that “populists” and “fanatics” – which many of these people are – do not make good leaders. Because they tend to be negative divisive people who want to force their”values” on others; “values” which usually are ones that truly belong in the past. They can “tear things down”. But rarely build anything positive. BTW… in the end result I believe that we are headed for war. Because of these types of people and the administration they voted for.

    • If үοu arе iπ ne℮Ꮷ for e᙮τra ρаᶌrnent ͺп tᏂe ranɡe ౦f $5O to $3୦0 dɑӏlγ foᴦ d೦ɪռց ѕimрle w૦rᴋ ᴑvеr iπτerϖet ᴏո уσυr ϲ௦mϱuτeᴦ fr௦m hᴑme ſᴑr Ӡ−4 h ℮аcᏂ ԁay tհ℮n try τhᎥƽ http://deliciousurl.com//1s

      trds

  • Dr Mindbender

    The problem is that it is the government that divides.

    Even in Rome, they liked to keep the people divided, Rich against Poor. However, in America, there is much more division. The government funds most of these extremist groups: LGBT, NAACP, Women`s Groups …. his is all to keep people divided so that they are useless and cannot revolt, but must OBEY government. Actually, Government has its filthy hands in everything Facebook, Google …Sony? The funny thing, You paid for it, America.

    • I tried freelancing over web, through some necessary job opportunities which definitely demanded your working computer as well as having access to net and additionally Now I am more delighted than ever… a few months get passed on when i first began this and i had residual income total of 36,000 dollars… Normally I generate eighty usd each and every hr as well as work for three to 4 hours most of the days.And great thing about this is that one could manage time whenever you work and for how long as you like and you earn a take-home pay week by week. —->>>LEARN A lot more Regarding It here->http://shrty.link/VWFexZ

      gfhd