Google Is Now Threatening My Publishers

Eric Zuesse

I just happened to notice at one of my publishers, RINF, “Google’s Censorship Of Independent News – Rinf Becomes Latest Victim”, and the owner, Mick Meaney, described Google’s threat to him if he didn’t remove a news-article that was critical of the Israeli government. He promptly removed it. He continued:

“Then the next day, as I expected, I received another email telling me to delete a second article. This time it was an article about Donald Trump, written by Eric Zuesse.”

He’s in a predicament:

“My choice is now; let Google dictate what information is acceptable, or significantly reduce the amount of time I spend devoted to RINF.”

I used to be published at places such as Huffington Post, Salon, and Common Dreams, but the number of sites that are willing to publish me has gradually reduced as more and more of my articles came to expose the operations that control the U.S. federal government. None of those publishers explained to me why they were dropping me. But now I understand. And Google isn’t alone in this; they’re part of the same operation that has taken over the U.S. and many foreign ‘news’ operations and thus now controls what the publics believe, in many countries.

I knew that this would happen. But, unlike some other courageous journalists, I’m still alive and able to continue doing the best job I can, for the public, and without charging anyone for access to it.

Please spread the word to all your friends, to read my articles at,,,,,,,,,, and the few other courageous news-sites that are still occasionally publishing me.

Incidentally, Google (now called “Alphabet Inc.”) were heavily involved in 2011 helping Hillary Clinton’s State Department draw up the plans to overthrow two heads-of-state that allied with Russia: Yanukovych in Ukraine, and Assad in Syria. The head of Google, Eric Schmidt, and the Hillary Clinton aide (now Google executive) Jared Cohen, met in 2011 privately with Julian Assange at the Ecuadorean Embassy, who had no idea, at the time, that they might be prying information from him in order to assist the U.S. State Department to organize jihadists online to go into Syria to overthrow Assad, and nazis online who already constituted two racist-fascist political parties in Ukraine to overthrow Yanukovych. It’s these sorts of things that the aristocracy want you not to know about — or, at least, not to understand in any accurate way. That’s the reality about ‘news’ as we now have it, at least in The West (the U.S. and its empire of vassal-aristocracies abroad). It’s propaganda.


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Dr Mindbender


    This is a major problem. Anything I post, critical of the US government, gets banned. I think google and others receive massive government funding ( they did not just lose 7-TRILLION, because that`s impossible) and it seems government owns everything in collusion. I warned Alex Jones, they will ban YOU TOO, because he has turned “rabid censor,” because I am sure, they threaten to pull their adds. He got banned.

    You have government trolls being paid to spy on boards and start trouble. Thereby, if posters who post anti-government statements are flagged and banned, well, nobody reads the post. Freedom of Speech and Expression, includes, especially, Unpopular and Unhappy speech and expression! Google is nothing but a BIG TROLL. The government thinks they are clever, but in realty they are nothing but simple, common thugs!

  • Joseph Glynn

    We were sold the internet, IT, the whole shebang with promises that it would enable communication, discourse, debate, democracy. That is indeed what the genuine pioneers intended and worked tirelessly to create.
    Alas, the thieves in power never stop destroying the commons and confining us all under the increasingly strict regime of one big prison. I can scarcely see any difference between contemporary capitalism and fascism. It is all toxic. If I cannot read Eric Zuesse on my computer I will hammer a six inch nail through it.

  • CMC761

    This is the new censorship. I’ve been using alternative search engines for most of my searches. But I still watch some videos on YouTube but most of the sources no longer get ad revenue or refused it from the beginning because they saw this coming.

  • andrew1212

    Wait until Trump let’s his generals start another war–then the only voices of dissent will be posted on bathroom walls.

    • Christinecmyers

      I’ve made $84,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. The potential with this is endless. Here’s what I do
      ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs634SupportManagement/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr634u:……..

  • mothwhoflysbackwards

    Eric, I am confused, wouldn’t an article on Trump reside within the realm of “acceptable debate” mentioned in the first link? Uh oh what did you say this time … could we get a link to the Trump article in question?

    Also, am I correct to assume that all your articles will eventually make their way to WB, or should I check the other sites mentioned? Thanks…

    • Eric Zuesse

      Every article I do gets posted directly here, and nowhere else do I have direct-posting privilege. I used to have it both here and at RINF. Mick Meaney (RINF’s owner) never contacted me about the matter of Google, and he already had actually dropped me after the last article that he posted from me there, which was March 2nd. After he had blocked my continuing to post articles directly there as I do here, which occurred sometime in December as I recollect, I submitted each article directly by email to him, and he selectively published some (and I do around one a day on average), but that halted on March 2nd, and I’ve had no communication with him at all in 2017. But I was noticing that many of the sites that used to post some of my articles, no longer do. I never knew why I was being dropped, but when I happened today upon Mick Meany’s article (which he posted there on April 6th, so it’s already a week old), I knew. The time-period when I started to be dropped seems to have started when I started reporting on the Ukrainian conflict in May 2014. And then I noticed that many sites would accept practically anything else but not honest news-reporting on U.S.-Russia issues. Even Huffington Post accepted some articles from me up till this one on 3 August 2016: but they had never published anything I wrote about U.S.-Russia relations. I think that the editor there who allowed that to be headlined from the homepage (around two-thirds of the way down the page) was fired for it, but no one ever explained to me what happened. Anyway, after that article, they banned me.

      • Marko
      • mothwhoflysbackwards

        Thanks for the reply, it’s good to know I won’t miss any of your articles if i check WB.

        That’s the crux though, “they” don’t want “honest news-reporting”. What’s surprising is articles on Trump are trouble — one would think some of the only acceptable articles are those that debate the duopoly.

        Know that I, and many others, appreciate your work.

  • tropicgirl

    The power mongers like Google are shooting up their last John Belushi needle…

    I think we already won, important information is spreading around the world at lightning speed. I don’t think they will be able to put the toothpaste back… look, for example, at how fast people are figuring out fake flags these days. About 24 hours… worldwide at the same time…

    If needed, the tech world will have to come up with alternatives, as I am told they are already prepared. it would unite a lot of people with know-how. Maybe we are just being too lazy using Google, Fakebook and Twitter….

    • ErnestineBass

      Using Google, Fakebook and Twitter doesn’t mean you’re lazy, it means you’re being tracked.

  • Debrah McCabe

    A few days ago, I pointed some commenters towards the alleged hacking of Veterans Today and was roundly abused for spending time on a ‘National Enquirer’ type site that had no merit. The allegation from the editor was that Donald Trumps people were involved and was my first look at how America’s new president seems to be going from pointing the finger at ‘fake news’ sites to hacking and disabling. And now I’ve read this article. The march towards our demise continues apace.

  • I had a followup discussion with RINF editor Mick Meaney about this. He posted the links to the original article, and I encouraged him to publicize the case, pursue it with Google, and possibly take up a lawsuit with the help of the ACLU. You can read our exchange in the Disque comment section of the RINF article linked above.

  • Michael Machnica

    As a matter of principal, I refuse to join fakebook to the chagrin of my children and only started a gmail account because I needed one for smartphone apps. I never use Google voice commands or searches.

    I was SO HAPPY when that list of 200 or so “untrustworthy fake news sites” was published several months ago. I immediately printed out two copies, in case the webpage was ever removed. I am going to have them laminated, since I recently found out that a friend has a machine to do that.

    I had yearned for years for such a list, as I only had a portion of the listed websites bookmarked in my browser, mostly the “larger” or more “notorious” sites that happened to be blasphemed by the MSM. Thanks to “the enemy”, now I have obtained everything I need to this date to evaluate data and news for myself. I probably could have found more if I had the time to check out other links from the sites I did have; however, that is no longer necessary.

  • IIvan

    Terrorists from FBI- Bill Dolan & Harry Sienkewich, Springfield, MA — organized police mafia in state of Crimemachusetts, they destroy family, sell children for criminal people. They illegally opens a criminal cases against people. They stole the private property- houses, cars — stolen cars reregisters for criminal people, use illegal duplicate titles. They illegally sent’s a people in madhouse without court decision. They protects criminal people from court, illegally confiscate criminal cases from court ( make’s money). 11.16.2017 Department of State, Washington D.C. opened a criminal case H20170279 against several terrorists in uniform of police officers & their under control criminal people and ordered Executive Office OIG- USDOJ to investigate this case. But corrupted USDOJ ignored this order from DOS. US Department of State has no power to control corrupted USDOJ. Now question–United States is Freedom Country or Country of Freedom for Corruption and Crime ???. Constitution United States is Fake !!!.