Trump’s Presidency Failed in Record Time

Eric Zuesse

Trumpcare — his promised replacement for Obamacare — is so blatantly atrocious that an excellent NBC News article on it is headlined, and documents that — “Experts: The GOP Health Care Plan Just Won’t Work”. This was even before the Congressional Budget Office has had a chance to price out its costs to taxpayers (which can only sink it even deeper).

In other words: Trump’s healthcare promises, too, have now irretrievably bitten the dust. 

Before that, there had been campaign promises which he already had casually abandoned, and the abandonment of which was an insult to the millions of people who voted for him because he had promised those things: things such as, “Lock her up!” for Hillary Clinton’s having never even been investigated for the things she did with her email that were illegal on their very face. (The FBI investigated her only on the more-difficult-to-prove charges.) 

When asked about the “Lock her up!” promise, Trump displayed the nerve, on December 9th, to say “That plays great before the election — now we don’t care, right?” and he didn’t even wait for an answer — because until the election, his promise to do exactly that, about which he now said “we don’t care,” was one of his biggest applause-lines.

Clearly, then, his campaign-promises that, as President, he would impose real accountability — something which has been entirely absent at the top in America for decades — were just cheap lies for votes.

And he also had promised to “Drain the swamp!” of its corruption, but likewise casually abandoned that, with Newt Gingrich saying on December 22nd, “I’m told he now just disclaims that. He now says it was cute, but he doesn’t want to use it anymore” — and this was even before Trump became President! He quit the progressive promises even before he moved into the White House.

Every progressive thing that he had so much as suggested — such as that maybe free healthcare for poor people isn’t such a bad idea, or that maybe global warming is a problem — was simply ignored by him after he won the Presidency.

But the healthcare-issue is the one which will decimate his Presidency, because he’s not even trying to deliver what he had promised on that, and yet it’s an issue that everyone cares lots about, and which (unlike the accountability-issue) he can’t simply pretend is minor.

Trump had told Scott Pelley of CBS “60 Minutes” on September 27th, while campaigning against Hillary Clinton, that he favors taxpayer-paid healthcare for Americans who cannot afford to pay for the basic healthcare they need — and this idea, of basic healthcare as a right instead of as a privilege, was something that Ms. Clinton had always said was a “one size fits all” approach that reduces consumer-choices and is inappropriate for the United States. Trump, to the contrary, told Pelley:

Donald Trump: By the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private.” But — Scott Pelley: Universal health care? Donald Trump: I am going to take care of everybody. I don’t care if it costs me votes or not. Everybody’s going to be taken care of much better than they’re taken care of now. Scott Pelley: The uninsured person is going to be taken care of how? Donald Trump: They’re going to be taken care of. I would make a deal with existing hospitals to take care of people. And, you know what, if this is probably — Scott Pelley: Make a deal? Who pays for it? Donald Trump: — The government’s gonna pay for it.”

It would actually cost far less than what the U.S. (including the government, the insurers, and the patients) now spends on healthcare. Recent OECD data on healthcare costs show that the U.S., which is the only OECD country that handles healthcare as a privilege instead of as a right, spends by far the world’s highest percentage of GDP on healthcare, 16.9 percent; and also show that the average U.S. life expectancy is 78.7 years; by contrast, Canada spends 10.2 percent, and their life expectancy is 81.0 years. The OECD average expenditure is 9.3 percent , and life expectancy is 80.1 years. So: the U.S. spends almost twice as high a percentage of GDP as every other OECD nation, and yet gets markedly inferior results. This makes the U.S. far less economically competitive than it otherwise would be; but, the healthcare industries finance conservative politicians such as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and all Republicans; so, those politicians don’t like single-payer — it would take much of the excess profits out of exploiting the sick, and those excess profits help to fund their campaigns.

The American people’s financial losses produce exceptional financial gains for the investors in healthcare-related stocks, and also inflate the pay for executives in those firms. This helps to fund lots of what conservatives such as Antonin Scalia lovingly call “free speech” — campaign commercials.

Here are the latest available data, and they show that, still today, the U.S. is somewhat worse than average, for quality of care, and astronomically higher than any nation on both per-capita healthcare costs, and the percentage of GDP that goes to healthcare costs. For examples: across 45 countries tabulated by the OECD, the U.S. healthcare-expenditure per capita was $8,713 and 16.4% of GDP, whereas the average OECD country paid $3,453 and 8.9% of GDP. France paid $4,124 and 10.9% of GDP, and Japan paid $3,713 and 10.2% of GDP. The U.S. also was tied with Brazil, Chile, and South Africa, for having the highest percentage of healthcare-costs that’s paid privately rather than by the government.

In any case, with our existing healthcare-for-profit, instead of healthcare-as-a-right, system, the U.S. ends up paying lots more than our competing nations, yet getting inferior results. (Apparently, postponing care until one is being rushed into an emergency-room is both atrociously poor care, and extremely expensive care. But it’s the most profitable for the sickness-industries — so, President Trump wants it to continue. Republicans care lots more about corporate stockholders than they do about the public’s welfare; and, unlike Democrats, they don’t pretend not to. That’s the difference between the two Parties.)

Consequently: What Trump was promising on healthcare was the only way to reduce America’s healthcare costs. It would also — if the experience of the other OECD countries, all of which treat basic healthcare as a right not a privilege, is to teach us anything — considerably increase the quality of our healthcare, yet cost far less. 

But Trump instead (like his predecessors) cares more about the profits to healthcare-providers than about the healthcare of the American people and about the competitiveness of the American economy.

All of the progressive-sounding things that Trump said, were just lies. But he’s pushing hard the conservative-sounding things. He’s trying to fulfill only his conservative (i.e., pro-aristocracy, anti-public) promises. But conservatism is based entirely upon lies (saying it’s being done ‘for the benefit of the ruled, not of the rulers’); so, one can only hope that his now-doomed Presidency will achieve as little as possible — as little harm to the nation as possible, so that nothing should pass in the far-right Republican-controlled Congress and get signed into law in this far-right Republican White House — by either Trump, or (if the President becomes the current Vice President, Mike) Pence. A four-year total deadlock would thus be the best that can realistically be hoped for, now.

Obama’s Presidency was lousy, but Trump’s (and/or Pence’s) could be even worse. A country that’s becoming more and more an aristocracy — or what’s commonly called an “oligarchy” — and less and less an actual democracy, does better to block political change, than to allow it. America today is certainly in that situation; it’s in decline.


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • David S

    Natural rights are ONLY those that can be exercised WITHOUT violating the rights of others. Treating healthcare as a “right” is completely inappropriate, as the exercise of this “right” REQUIRES the violation of the rights of millions. Let’s begin with paying for this so-called “right.” Theft from anyone (either at the point of a gun, or by government through force or threats of force/violence) is immoral and a violation of the property rights of the victim (yes, I do believe that EVERY government taking and service is immoral and should stop). Now let’s look at the hospital and/or facility. To force a facility to care for someone, provide them a place to stay to recover, etc. demands that their rights be violated (either through taking of monies, property, etc.). Now the doctors and nurses and all others involved. What if they are forced to provide care without adequate compensation? Once again, theft. And what if they are so sick and tired of the practice of medicine that they ALL decide to quit? In order for this “right” to be exercised will the government FORCE them against their will to continue working? Or working at a financial loss? Multiple violations of their rights and even a relationship that borders on slavery would be the outcome. And what if nobody wants to be a doctor/nurse, etc.? In order to insure this so-called “right” are we to now FORCE people to become doctors/nurses, etc. or throw them in prison or kill them if they refuse?

    The RIGHT to freely seek care and services from another is implicit in natural rights. The right to DEMAND these services is NOT a natural right. The government has DESTROYED freedom and liberty in this country. Medicine is just ONE of MANY markets that have been destroyed. People do NOT have the right to seek services from whomever they wish. They do not have the right to purchase whatever medicine they desire. They do not have the right to purchase insurance from whomever they desire. They do not have the right to do countless things that most certainly ARE natural rights of a human being. THE GOVERNMENT has destroyed those rights through their collusion with the AMA, the insurance and banking cartels, and the pharmaceutical industry (among others). So, having DESTROYED true natural rights, they now (and folks like you) propose to violate more natural rights to create an ARTIFICIAL and un-natural “right” to demand services, demand money, and enslave fellow citizens instead. Sorry, market pricing, pricing signals, consumer valuation, acknowledgement of limited resources, honest money, and all the other hallmarks of a truly FREE MARKET are the ONLY things that will EVER restore a sound and functional medical system in this country and globally. Central planning NEVER works, and enslavement of a populace to provide a service that fundamentally is no more complicated or critical than the provision of food, housing, clean water, and the other essentials of life, is as immoral a proposal as one could make. Indeed, the US medical system was truly screwed up before Obamacare. 100+ years of government meddling and collusion with various industry players made it that way. RYANCARE (a more accurate name than Trumpcare) is a complete disaster BECAUSE it does NOTHING to restore FREEDOM to the marketplace and instead rewards all of the same criminals that Obamacare rewarded and then some. The GOP hates freedom as much as the democrats do. That however does not change the truth that ONLY FREEDOM can restore what government has willfully destroyed.

    • Eric Zuesse

      Privatized healthcare, such as exists in the U.S. to a far greater extent than any other industrialized nation, robs the public of its health as compared to what socialization of the healthcare function provides, and it increases enormously the price of that inferior healthcare, but is good for investors in those provider-firms, and so is advantageous to the investor-class, but harms the heath and robs money (for those investors) from the general public. So: it’s of benefit to some in the investor-class but harms the health and wealth of everyone else — and, on top of that, it impoverishes the entire American nation by reducing our economic competitiveness, not only because those healthcare investors are sucking their money out of all businesses and individuals, but because the sicker resulting public will inevitably be far less productive than the public are in the other countries, which aren’t so pro-theft. Stealing from the public is still stealing, no matter what your libertarian dogmatists say.

  • I’ve made 104 thousand dollars in last twelve months by doing an on-line job at my house a­­n­­d I did that by work­ing in my own time for several hrs a day. I was following a business model I found on-line and I am so happy that I was able to earn so much extra income. It’s really beginner-friendly a­­n­­d I am just so blessed that i discovered this. Here is what i did…

    • cettel

      Fiona, you spammer, go to hell!

  • USA_objector

    No worries, Eric. This is just the beginning of the Art of the Deal. Trump had to force Ryan to do something rather than run out the clock on repeal-and-replace. So he gave Ryan the power to craft a bill that looks like Obamacare 2.0. Ryan was all smug when he faced the cameras and presented this pig with lipstick. All part of Trump’s plan. Now it faces resistance. THIS IS A GOOD THING. It forces the RINO republicans to justify an unworkable plan and brings Rand Paul front and center as the alpha dog to fix it. Recall that he and Trump had a long conversation about it and Trump tweeted to the public mentioning Paul by name. There’s some 4-dimensional chess in play here. Sit back, give it time and see what happens.

    Meanwhile, take a look at what Circa News is saying about TWO wire taps on Trump in October. What do you think Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch were REALLY talking about on the Tarmac that day?