The Overlapping Crises Are Coming, Regardless of Who’s in Power

Commentators seem split into three camps: those who see Trump as a manifestation of smouldering social/economic ills, those who see Trump and his supporters as the cause of those ills, and those who see Trump as both manifestation and cause of those ills.

I think this misses the point, which is the overlapping crises unfolding in this decade– diminishing returns on skyrocketing debts, the demographics of an aging populace, the erosion of the social contract and the profound disunity of political elites–will continue expanding and feeding on each other regardless of who is in power.

Historical analysis seems to swing between the “Big Man/Woman” narrative that views individuals as the drivers of history, and the “Big Forces/it’s all economics” narrative that sees individual leaders as secondary to the broad sweep of forces beyond the control of any individual or group.

So while the mainstream views President Lincoln as the linchpin of the Civil War–his election triggered the southern secession–from the “Big Forces/it’s all economics” view, Lincoln was no more than the match that lit a conflict that was made inevitable by forces larger than the 1860 election.

The tension between these two narratives is valuable, as history cannot be entirely reduced to individual decisions or broad forces (weather, resource depletion, financial crisis, geopolitical upheaval, demographics, plague, etc.). The dynamic interplay between the two shapes history.

Individuals do matter–but they cannot offset structural crises for long.

Which brings us to Trump. The status quo is falling apart for profoundly structural reasons: promises made when growth was robust, debt was modest, energy was cheap and abundant and the work force was far more numerous than those dependent on the central state’s “pay as you go” pension and welfare programs– these promises made in yesteryear can no longer be kept, regardless of who’s in power.

We cannot get blood out of a turnip, and those who claim we can are only exacerbating the coming crises with their fantasies and denials.

I’ve been addressing these slow-moving, inevitable crises for the past 10 years. Despite the illusion of tepid “growth” and the maintenance of the status quo, beneath the surface everything is becoming much more fragile and increasingly brittle.

Even Timothy Geithner concedes this in his recent Foreign Affairs article on how to deal with the next global financial crisis. The central banks and states have expended all their ammunition– lowering interest rates, creating money out of thin air to bolster systemic liquidity, buying bonds and other assets to prop up shaky markets, and borrowing immense sums to prop up government spending– and there is little left for the next crisis.

Why I Have to Agree with Tim Geithner on This (March 8, 2017)

And this sober view–that some additional central bank trickery can save the system in the next financial crisis–assumes things that are unlikely to be true: what if energy is no longer cheap and abundant? What if global weather isn’t conducive to grain surpluses? What if central banks buying stocks no longer props up the market? What if debt finally reaches levels that cannot be sustained?

Could Hillary, or some other leader, forestall these deeply structural crises? The short answer is no. The only thing a leader can actually do is lower expectations so the erosion of promises that cannot be kept will be accepted as inevitable, and bolster hope while demanding sacrifices of all those who have benefited from the status quo.

If we look back on great leaders who dealt with one crisis after another, we find they didn’t actually make the crises disappear; they only managed them on the margins, and spoke to the need to make sacrifices for a better future.

If we set aside the rose-colored glasses, we find that Franklin Roosevelt didn’t actually “lead the nation out of Depression.” The nation was still deeply entrenched in the Depression in 1940, after 8 years of FDR’s leadership. It took World War II and federal borrowing and spending on an unimaginable scale to extricate the U.S. from the grip of bad debt the powers that be refused to write off and the resulting stagnation.

Which brings us again to Trump. Since no one can actually resolve these overlapping crises, a focus on the individual leader’s actions is a distraction. Yes, an individual can manage the margins of crisis more or less effectively.

But overlapping mutually reinforcing crises are not a war, with a victorious and a vanquished side. As Peter Turchin and other writers I have quoted and discussed for many years have detailed, these structural trends play out regardless of policy tweaks or grand pronouncements. Leaders who manage to ease the decline or temporarily reverse it are considered successes; those who exacerbate the decline are considered failures.

Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform.

No leader can reverse the dynamics of mutually reinforcing crises. No one can reverse the diminishing returns on financialization, debt, centralization, financial fakery, rentier state-cartel parasitism, or reverse the decline in paid work, the erosion of well-being and health and rising inequality.

There is no way to actually forestall the reckoning as the forces of demographics, financial predation, Imperial over-reach, soaring debts, political disunity, technology disruption and the failings of state-cartel centralization grind up the status quo.

This essay was drawn from Musings Report 5. The weekly Musings Reports are emailed exclusively to major donors and patrons ($5/month or $50 annually).

Recent podcasts/video programs:

Keiser Report: Jon Corzine’s Big, Bad Bond Bet (25:43 min., 2nd half)

Self-Employment & Financial Bubbles (1:26 hrs)

Charles Hugh Smith On Inequalities And The Distortions Caused By Central Bank Policies (30 min.)

Rogue Money (56:59 min.)

If you found value in this content, please join me in seeking solutions by becoming a $1/month patron of my work via

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • I was paid 104000 dollars last year by doing a web based job and also I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours each day. I utilized job opportunity I stumbled upon on the net and so I am thrilled that I was capable to earn such good money. It is really newbie-friendly and I’m so blessed that I found out about it. Look into exactly what I do…

  • Shiggity

    Capitalism needs an upgrade.

    The entire notion of money(central banking fiat currencies) is becoming obsolete , the entire notion of work (in the 20th century sense) is becoming obsolete, scarcity is becoming obsolete due to digital technologies creating vast amounts of abundance.

    Our current form of capitalism cannot handle abundance. This is a very big problem because automation technology / digital technology will be able to make almost everything abundant. Not EVERYTHING, but almost everything. Scarcity will still exist for a tiny amount of things, but not many.

    In modern economics text books they don’t even mention the word abundance. That’s how big of a problem this is.

    Trying to explain a new form of capitalism to someone right now is as difficult as it was trying to explain our current form of capitalism to someone living in a feudal society.

    If you look at history, going from feudalism -> capitalism wasn’t exactly pretty. The people at the top of the old obsolete system are not going to let it go willingly.

    • cstahnke

      I think new forms are emerging within our current fairly repressive structures. Most of these new forms exist as attitudes, emotions, mental states and so on. I’ve never seen a time when people from all backgrounds and levels of knowledge about the world were more skeptical about official Narratives presented to them by the propaganda organs. I think with a complex system like our own that breakdowns will gradually paralyze the system and work-arounds will quickly be put in place and from that a new more pragmatic system will emerge. The only question is how much collateral damage with that breakdown create and whether it will be so catastrophic that nothing can be salvaged.

      • M­a­n­y p­e­o­ple w­a­nt t­o ha­v­e a go­o­d earnings at their, bu­t t­he­y don’t have much idea ho­w t­o exactly d­o th­at o­n th­e Int­ernet. Th­ere ar­e a many w­ays t­o ea­rn big am­ount of mo­ney, b­ut wh­enev­er p­eopl­e t­ry th­at the­y g­et tr­app­ed in a s­cam, Therefore Now I am sh­aring wi­th yo­u a g­enuine an­d gu­arante­ed w­ay f­or fre­e to ea­rn hug­e am­ount of mon­ey a­t ho­me.I am making atleast $10000 per month since a whole year.Its an internet based work and also easy to do, Even a little child can do this work and make money. If you want a happy and wealthy life then you need to copy and paste this internet site in browser and then follow instructions to get started today and make Thousands On-line………..

  • I work from home, performing basic work which only requires from you a computer and internet connection and it is a life-saver for me personally… After six months time with this job opportunity and i gained already total of 36,000 dollars… Basicly i earn about eighty bucks/h and work for three to four hr most of the days.And good thing regarding this job is that you can easily manage time when you work and for how long as you like and you get paid weekly >>

  • animalogic

    As per the usual, this author engages in a bit of slight of hand: he neatly conflates economic with systemic POLITICAL failure. Yes, the two are grossly interlinked….however:
    “Which brings us to Trump. The status quo is falling apart for profoundly structural reasons: promises made when growth was robust, debt was modest, energy was cheap and abundant and the work force was far more numerous than those dependent on the central state’s “pay as you go” pension and welfare programs– these promises made in yesteryear can no longer be kept, regardless of who’s in power.”
    Really ? Promises can’t be kept ? Oh ! It’s the economy, stupid !
    No it’s the politics. A few economic possibles: shut down much of the imperialist military spending. It’s something like 60% of the US discretionary budget — the odd 100–1000 billion saving there. And how about taxing all the financial parasites ? Say, a Tobin tax on a variety of speculatory transactions ? Should be a few 100 billion there. Close all the disgusting tax loop holes for all business’s – more 100’s of billions…& there you are – maybe the government CAN afford it’s promises…..
    But, true, no leader could do this…alone. But with backing of 10’s of millions of active, assertive , knowledgeable citizens ? Who knows ? Government for the common good, by the common people…might be worth a try … ?