Trump Expected To Sign Orders For “Safe Zone” In Syria According To Reports

Syria refugees Valentina Petrova/AP, posted at FT blogsBrandon Turbeville
Activist Post
BrandonTurbeville.com

President Donald Trump is expected to sign yet another Executive Order regarding his plan to suspend the U.S.’s “refugee” program and a tightening of procedures for vetting individuals entering the United States under a refugee visa. Few but the most ardent open immigration proponent against such a policy.

However, tucked away in the document, according to mainstream news sources like Reuters and Newsweek, is a provision to create “safe zones” in Syria.

As Julia Edwards Ashley and Matt Spetalnick of Reuters summarized,

President Donald Trump is expected to order the Pentagon and the State Department in coming days to craft a plan for setting up “safe zones” for refugees in Syria, according to a document seen by Reuters on Wednesday, a move that could risk escalation of U.S. military involvement in Syria’s civil war.

The draft executive order awaiting Trump’s signature signaled the new administration may be preparing a step that his predecessor Barack Obama long resisted, fearing the potential for being pulled deeper into the bloody conflict and the threat of clashes between U.S. and Russian warplanes over Syria.

“The Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, is directed within 90 days of the date of this order to produce a plan to provide safe areas in Syria and in the surrounding region in which Syrian nationals displaced from their homeland can await firm settlement, such as repatriation or potential third-country resettlement,” the draft order said.

Creation of safe zones, if Trump decides to do so, could ratchet up U.S. military involvement in Syria and mark a major departure from Obama’s more cautious approach. Increased U.S. or allied air power would be required if Trump chooses to enforce “no fly” restrictions, and ground forces might also be needed to protect civilians in those areas.

Still, the document gave no details on what would constitute a safe zone, exactly where they might be set up and who would defend them. Jordan, Turkey and other neighboring countries already host millions of Syrian refugees. The Turkish government had long pressed Obama, without success, for creation of a no-fly zone in Syria on its border with Turkey.

The draft raised the possibility of establishing those safe havens in neighboring countries but did not elaborate.

The move is being characterized as being part of a larger plan to restrict refugee influx to the United States, especially from specific countries.

In true Trump fashion, the document allegedly lacks details. While it is possible that the order only revolves around the repatriation of refugees already inside the country, given the coverage provided to the issue of “safe zones” and “no fly zones” in Syria over the past few years, it is unlikely that the terminology would be used out of ignorance. If the “safe zones” are established in “neighboring countries,” then there is the possibility that terms are being blurred but it is not likely that other countries will want anymore refugees themselves.

It should also be noted that the order is not an order to produce a “safe zone” but an order to produce a plan to create one. A fine line but a line nonetheless.

Still, while it is entirely reasonable to begin scaling back America’s open immigration policies and influx of questionable refugees as well as sending them back to their home countries where possible, a “safe zone” in Syria is an entirely different ball game. “Safe Zones” as we know them mean war – plain and simple. After all, a “safe zone” must be enforced and how else can it be enforced but with ground troops and fighter jets?

Such has even been admitted by top U.S. Generals when explaining exactly what a No Fly Zone would entail. As General Carter Ham stated,

We should make no bones about it. It first entails killing a lot of people and destroying the Syrian air defenses and those people who are manning those systems. And then it entails destroying the Syrian air force, preferably on the ground, in the air if necessary. This is a violent combat action that results in lots of casualties and increased risk to our own personnel.

General Philip Breedlove also echoed this description when he said,

I know it sounds stark, but what I always tell people when they talk to me about a no-fly zone is . . . it’s basically to start a war with that country because you are going to have to go in and kinetically take out their air defense capability

When Senator Roger Wicker asked Gen. Joe Dunford what it would take to impose a no fly zone upon Syria, the General responded, “Right now… for us to control all of the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia.”

The idea of establishing a “safe zone” in Syria is, of course, not a new concept. In July, 2015, the agreement being discussed would have effectively created a “buffer zone” that would have spanned from the Turkish border line into Syria. It would have extended from Azaz in the East to Jarablus in the West and as far south as al-Bab. The width of the zone would have been about 68 miles and would have extended around 40 miles deep into Syria, right on the doorstep of Aleppo. That “Buffer Zone” was actually created with Turkey’s Operation Euphrates Shield and it has functioned as the last open, NATO-protected supply line for ISIS and its allies to enter Syria from Turkey.

Many hoped that a Trump victory would finally mean the end of terrorism and destabilization in Syria. However, after a week in office, Trump is showing clear signs that he is as much an establishment figure as the rest as time moves on.

If America wants to stop terrorism in Syria, it need only stop funding it, supporting it, and directing it. It’s that simple. The U.S. could also call on its allies Saudi Arabia, Turkey, U.K., France, Qatar, and Israel to do the same. It could work with Russia to eliminate the remnants of terrorist forces and it could provide information and coordinates to both Syria and Russia on the whereabouts of terrorists and terrorist forces. At this point, legitimate refugees would no longer have a reason to leave and refugees taken in by the U.S. could be shuttled back to their home countries with no fear of them returning to war.

A “safe zone” under the guise of the repatriation of refugees is simply a safe zone under another name. With Obama, the argument was a “safe zone” to protect civilians from ISIS and Assad. Neither the American people nor the Syrian people want further American involvement in Syria. It is time to stop funding terrorists and “rebels” and to end the American presence in Syria.

Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is the author of seven books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 andvolume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 850 articles on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is BrandonTurbeville.com He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

This article may be freely shared in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

Image Credit: Valentina Petrova/AP, posted at FT blogs

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • jo6pac

    Yep, trump is channeling hillabilly.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmE9Jj-rEVs

  • wunsacon

    Oh, dear. But, check out that word “if” in the quote: “…Creation of safe zones, if Trump decides to do so, …”

    I hope this is a trial balloon or “fake news” from the MIC’s media allies, trying to set perceptions / expectations.

  • David S

    Just another continuation of the failed Clinton/Bush/Obama foreign policies. First the drone murders, then the rabid support of Israel over all others, then no-fly zones in a proxy war zone area with Russia. Nuclear winter will certainly take care of any global warming issues.

  • Brabantian

    Lots of media are already trial-ballooning US President Donald Trump’s removal from office via USA Constitution Amendment 25, which allows for quick coup d’état if Vice-President Mike Pence & half the Cabinet declare Trump mentally unfit for office, the Congress can then vote & Trump would be out in a day, with VP Pence in his place.

    The scenario replicates that of another populist President, the democratically-elected Mohamed Morsi of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, also hated by his nation’s Deep State.

    Like Trump, Morsi & the Muslim Brotherhood stood for reformist change as desired by many of his nation’s people, tho quite different reforms for their respective nations.

    Egyptians – & likely the majority of Muslims – gravitate naturally to the Muslim Brotherhood, with its religious, democratic, non-monarchical socialist agenda, with shariah law that is devout but less fanatic than the Saudi Wahhabis.

    Like Trump, Morsi appeared hated by his country’s Deep State from the very beginning.

    Like Trump, Morsi was seduced by advisers to scrap his promises & go along with neo-con-desired foreign adventures against other peoples … neither Morsi nor Trump realising that going along with neo-cons, endangers their own ability to survive in office.

    In Morsi’s tragic case (elected June 2012 – deposed July 2013), Morsi welshed on doing what a billion Muslims wanted him to do – End the Gaza blockade on the Egyptian side (Gaza used to be part of Egypt), & relieve the sufferings of the Palestinians there … If Morsi had done this he would have become the eternal, unstoppable hero of the Arab & Muslim worlds.

    The foolish Morsi, however, believed the lie it was ‘smarter’ to go along with neo-cons & Israel ‘for now’. Morsi not only went along with continuing to oppress his fellow Arabs, but even agreed to support Saudi Arabia & Israel & terrorist extremists in the war on Syria, instead of patiently advancing Muslim Brotherhood interests there.

    These betrayals cost Morsi the support of his base, whilst Egypt’s Deep State escalated manoeuvres against him, till finally Morsi was deposed by Israeli asset General al-Sisi (el-Sissi), born of a Moroccan Jewish mother associated with Israeli regime figures.

    Now we see Trump seduced by the same siren song of the neo-cons, as Trump escalates Obama’s drone plane murders of mid-east Muslims, & Trump plans raw aggression against the Syrian government with its Russian support … Trump already dispiriting his base who often see Putin as a hero, & Syria’s Assad as someone who stood tall against terrorism & stupid USA war-mongers.

  • Eric Zuesse

    Even for Trump to be considering “safe zones” or “no-fly zones” in Syria is outrageous, because it shows that he was faking it to allege that he didn’t share Hillary Clinton’s approach, her neoconservatism. If he decides for a “safe zone” or “no-fire zone,” then there will be an air war between Russia and the U.S. over Syrian airspace, where we’re the invading power and Russia is the defending power. If Russia gets defeated in that conventional war, then Russia will have to choose between being defeated or else a blitz nuclear invasion of the U.S.

    Especially because the U.S. had been the invader, having initiated war against Russia, which started the war, Russia would be entirely justified then in annihilating the U.S., even if that would annihilate all of civilization.

    Whatever history would remain to be written would reasonably assert then that Trump was even worse than Hitler. Let’s hope that he’s not so bad as that.