Michael Flynn Should Remember Truths He Blurted Out Last Year

Michael Flynn, expected to advise Donald Trump on counterproductive killing operations misleading labeled “national security,” is generally depicted as a lawless torturer and assassin. But, whether for partisan reasons or otherwise, he’s a lawless torturer and assassin who has blurted out some truths he shouldn’t be allowed to forget.

For example:

“Lt. Gen. Flynn, who since leaving the DIA has become an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, charges that the White House relies heavily on drone strikes for reasons of expediency, rather than effectiveness. ‘We’ve tended to say, drop another bomb via a drone and put out a headline that “we killed Abu Bag of Doughnuts” and it makes us all feel good for 24 hours,’ Flynn said. ‘And you know what? It doesn’t matter. It just made them a martyr, it just created a new reason to fight us even harder.'”

Or even more clearly:

“When you drop a bomb from a drone… you are going to cause more damage than you are going to cause good. The more weapons we give, the more bombs we drop, that just… fuels the conflict.”

Will Flynn then advise Trump to cease dropping bombs from drones? Or will he go ahead and advise drone murders, knowing full well that this is counterproductive from the point of view of anyone other than war profiteers?

From the same report:

“Asked . . . if drone strikes tend to create more terrorists than they kill, Flynn . . . replied: ‘I don’t disagree with that,’ adding: ‘I think as an overarching strategy, it is a failed strategy.'”

So Trump’s almost inevitable string of drone murders will be conducted under the guidance of a man who knows they produce terrorism rather than reducing it, that they endanger the United States rather than protecting it. In that assessment, he agrees with the vast majority of Americans who believe that the wars of the past 15 years have made the United States less safe, which is the view of numerous other experts as well.

Flynn, too, expanded his comments from drones to the wars as a whole:

“What we have is this continued investment in conflict. The more weapons we give, the more bombs we drop, that just… fuels the conflict. Some of that has to be done but I am looking for the other solutions.”

Flynn also, like Trump, accurately cites the criminal 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq as critical to the creation of ISIS:

“Commenting on the rise of ISIL in Iraq, Flynn acknowledged the role played by the US invasion and occupation of Iraq. ‘We definitely put fuel on a fire,’ he told Hasan. ‘Absolutely… there is no doubt, history will not be kind to the decisions that were made certainly in 2003. Going into Iraq, definitely… it was a strategic mistake.”

So there will be no advice to make similar strategic mistakes that are highly profitable to the weapons industry?

Flynn, despite perhaps being a leading advocate of lawless imprisonment and torture, also admits to the counterproductive nature of those crimes:

“The former lieutenant general denied any involvement in the litany of abuses carried out by JSOC interrogators at Camp Nama in Iraq, as revealed by the New York Times and Human Rights Watch, but admitted the US prison system in Iraq in the post-war period ‘absolutely’ helped radicalise Iraqis who later joined Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and its successor organisation, ISIL.”

Recently the International Criminal Court teased the world with the news that it might possible consider indicting US and other war criminals for their actions in Afghanistan. One might expect all-out resistance to such a proposal from Trump and his gang of hyper-nationalist war mongers, except that . . .

“Flynn also called for greater accountability for US soldiers involved in abuses against Iraqi detainees: ‘You know I hope that as more and more information comes out that people are held accountable… History is not going to look kind on those actions… and we will be held, we should be held, accountable for many, many years to come.'”

Let’s not let Flynn forget any of these words. On Syria he has blurted out some similar facts to those Trump has also articulated:

“Publicly commenting for the first time on a previously-classified August 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) memo, which had predicted ‘the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in Eastern Syria (…) this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want’ and confirmed that ‘the Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood, and [Al Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,’ the former DIA chief told Head to Head that ‘the [Obama] Administration’ didn’t ‘listen’ to these warnings issued by his agency’s analysts. ‘I don’t know if they turned a blind eye,’ he said. ‘I think it was a decision, I think it was a willful decision.'”

Let that sink in. Flynn is taking credit for having predicted that backing fighters in Syria could lead to something like ISIS. And he’s suggesting that Obama received this information and chose to ignore it.

Now, here’s a question: What impact will “bombing the hell” out of people have? What good will “killing their families” do? Spreading nukes around? “Stealing their oil”? Making lists of and banning Muslims? Is it Flynn’s turn to willfully ignore key facts and common sense in order to “advise” against his better judgment a new president who prefers to be advised to do what he was going to do anyway?

Or can Flynn be convinced to apply lessons learned at huge human cost to similar situations going forward even with a president of a different party, race, and IQ?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • rightisallright

    “I’d never heard of Steve Bannon until Trump named him as chief strategist and senior counselor.

    I soon learned that Bannon is executive chairman of Breitbart, which
    the media labels an “alt right” news source (I’ve only read a few
    articles on Breitbart, when linked from other websites).”

    Ok George, when you pen a sentence like that, you are pretty much admitting that you are severely out of touch with real world events. Breitbart is now the #3 news website on the internet, as measured by total engagement statistics, and you have never read it till recently? They are way ahead of the dying NYT, and will soon be the #1 site if the current near vertical line of user engagement growth keeps on.

    You just outed yourself as a university professor who needs to climb down from the ivory tower. And bear in mind I like your Blog, and you, been reading it on ZH for years. I know this sounds harsh, but it does tend to dent my belief that you know what you are talking about.

    • Uwhat

      Millions of us log on to Briebart to
      read first hand the utter garbage masquerading as news. Reading and commenting on some of the worst stories has become a national sport for many of us.

  • Taras77

    A real plus for Flynn was/is that he absolutely could not get along with Susan Rice and the other “strategic geniuses” in the admin-he recognized the strategy for what it was, completely incoherent.


      I don’t know if ‘coherence’ has any application in the justification for genocide or murder which in and of itself is a global terror threat by oligarchy when no citizen anywhere on the earth is safe from a Hellfire missile fired by a C.I.A. / MOSSAD puppetdent, as I refer to Soetoro and Bush baby as.

      praytell can anyone tell me what ‘coherence’ there is to have young men and women sitting at Creech Lake or Holloman AFB in NM, hovering over innocent lives far from the U.S., and arbitrarily make a decision to terminate those lives by a directive?

      Amerdekuhnz disgust me in that they can easily sleep every single night knowing the illegitimacy known as the U.S. federal government, can, at will, kill anyone anywhere without any judicial process or right of the ‘target’ to have an appeal in any world court if one did exist.

      coherence? shit, I only see fucking murder. state sponsored murder.

      Imagine the brouhaha if the shoe were on the other foot, that these very same puppets of jew monsters and their henchmen routinely were taken out by drones operated in U.S. territorial airspace from, say, any country which has the wherewithall’s to incorporate stealth technology into a drone so that radar was not effective in tracking it, and no known countermeasures existed to neutralize it?

      that day will someday come. I sincerely doubt any ‘coherence’ will be noted then either.

      thanks, but ‘coherence’ doesn’t even come to mind when discussing arbitrary terror campaigns designed to psychologically wreak havoc on the population of the world.

      Amerdekuhn’s should be fucking ashamed of themselves for allowing the ‘coherence’ of this shit to go unabated from one CIA / MOSSAD puppet to the next one, thinking that Drumph will rein it the fuck in. Gimme a break. Really?