These Blast Points on Hillary’s Campaign… Only The Deep State Is So Precise

Back in August, I asked Could the Deep State Be Sabotaging Hillary? I think we now have a definitive answer: “These blast points on Hillary’s campaign… too accurate for the Mainstream Media. Only the forces of the Imperial Deep State are so precise.”

The Mainstream Media is presenting the FBI investigation as a “lose-lose” situation for embattled FBI Director Comey. If Comey remained quiet until after the election, he would be accused of colluding with the Clinton campaign and its allies in the Department of Justice (sic).

But in going public, he stands accused by Democrats of “intervening in an election,” i.e. raising doubts about Hillary’s judgement and veracity days before Americans go to the polls.

Another narrative has Comey’s hand forced by the threat of disgusted FBI agents leaking information that would show the FBI caved into political pressure from the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign to keep relevant material out of the public eye until after the election.

I submit another much more powerful dynamic is in play: the upper ranks of the Deep State now view Hillary as an unacceptable liability. The word came down to Comey to act whether he wanted to or not, i.e. take one for the good of the nation/Deep State/Imperial Project.

As a refresher: the Deep State is the unelected government (also called the invisible or shadow government) that is not as monolithic as generally assumed.

The neo-conservative globalists who want Hillary to continue pushing their agenda are the more visible camp, but another less visible but highly motivated camp realizes Hillary and her neo-con agenda would severely damage the nation’s security and its global influence. It is this camp that is arranging for Hillary to lose.

The consensus view seems to be that the Establishment and the Deep State see Trump as a loose cannon who might upset the neo-con apple cart by refusing to toe the neo-con line.

This view overlooks the reality that significant segments of the Deep State view the neo-con strategy as an irredeemable failure. To these elements of the Deep State, Hillary is a threat precisely because she embraces the failed neo-con strategy and those who cling to it. From this point of view, Hillary as president would be an unmitigated disaster for the Deep State and the nation/Imperial Project it governs.

Whatever else emerges from the emails being leaked or officially released, one conclusion is inescapable: Hillary’s judgement is hopelessly flawed. Combine her lack of judgement with her 24 years of accumulated baggage and her potential to push the neo-con agenda to the point of global disaster, and you get a potent need for the Deep State’s most prescient elements to derail her campaign and clear a path to Trump’s executive team.

Once this path is clear, the management of Trump’s executive team can begin in earnest, a management process aimed at disengaging the nation and its global Empire from neo-con overreach.

If you think this scenario is “impossible,” let’s see how the election plays out before deciding what’s “impossible” and what’s inevitable.

My new book is #8 on Kindle short reads -> politics and social science: Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform ($3.95 Kindle ebook, $8.95 print edition) For more, please visit the book’s website.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • What is Going On with Wikileaks? Assange MIA, MacFadyen Dead and the CIA Honeypot Trying to Tank the Clinton Campaign? What Gives?

    10-23-16

    I’ve been asked on several occasions about what I think is going on with Wikileaks and all these document dumps they are releasing trying to derail the Hillary train, at least in terms of appearances, when in fact we all know that Wikileaks is a CIA honeypot designed to:

    1. aid various regime change propaganda as needed by influencing the more left-wing of the alternative media outlets

    2. serve as a black hole for real leaks from real whistle-blowers when they make the mistake of trusting Wikileaks and sending something to them

    Wikileaks was established in 2006 at a time when real whistle-blowers like William Binney, Russ Tice, Mark Klein (Room 641A ) and a few others were starting to make things really difficult for our glorious leaders who had a totally different world in mind for us to live in. You may also recall in 2004 the story of Abu Ghraib broke complete with leaked photos depicting horrific torture being conducted by our troops who were running the detention center.

    So in 2006 something needed to be done in order to keep real whistle-blowers from getting their stories on the front pages of every news paper and website in the country and thus, Wikileaks was born. The idea of a honeypot was hatched.

    http://tinyurl.com/j4ag7r8

    Wikileaks: a big dangerous US Government Con Job

    by F. William Engdahl

    12-10-10

    The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. However, a closer look at the details of what has so far been carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress that of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet.

    http://www.voltairenet.org/article167733.html

    Who is Behind Wikileaks?

    Originally published in December 2010

    “World bankers, by pulling a few simple levers that control the flow of money, can make or break entire economies. By controlling press releases of economic strategies that shape national trends, the power elite are able to not only tighten their stranglehold on this nation’s economic structure, but can extend that control world wide. Those possessing such power would logically want to remain in the background, invisible to the average citizen.” (Aldous Huxley)

    Wikleaks is upheld as a breakthrough in the battle against media disinformation and the lies of the US government.

    Unquestionably, the released documents constitute an important and valuable data bank. The documents have been used by critical researchers since the outset of the Wikileaks project. Wikileaks earlier revelations have focussed on US war crimes in Afghanistan (July 2010) as well as issues pertaining to civil liberties and the “militarization of the Homeland” (see Tom Burghardt, Militarizing the “Homeland” in Response to the Economic and Political Crisis, Global Research, October 11, 2008)

    In October 2010, WikiLeaks was reported to have released some 400,000 classified Iraq war documents, covering events from 2004 to 2009 (Tom Burghardt, The WikiLeaks Release: U.S. Complicity and Cover-Up of Iraq Torture Exposed, Global Research, October 24, 2010). These revelations contained in the Wikileaks Iraq War Logs provide “further evidence of the Pentagon’s role in the systematic torture of Iraqi citizens by the U.S.-installed post-Saddam regime.” (Ibid)
    . . .
    From the outset, Wikileaks’ geopolitical focus on “oppressive regimes” in Eurasia and the Middle East was “appealing” to America’s elites, i.e. it seemingly matched stated US foreign policy objectives. Moreover, the composition of the Wikileaks team (which included Chinese dissidents), not to mention the methodology of “exposing secrets” of foreign governments, were in tune with the practices of US covert operations geared towards triggering “regime change” and fostering “color revolutions” in different parts of the World.

    The Role of the Corporate Media: The Central Role of the New York Times

    Wikileaks is not a typical alternative media initiative. The New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel are directly involved in the editing and selection of leaked documents. The London Economist has also played an important role.

    While the project and its editor Julian Assange reveal a commitment and concern for truth in media, the recent Wikileaks releases of embassy cables have been carefully “redacted” by the mainstream media in liaison with the US government. (See Interview with David E. Sanger, Fresh Air, PBS, December 8, 2010)

    This collaboration between Wikileaks and selected mainstream media is not fortuitous; it was part of an agreement between several major US and European newspapers and Wikileaks’ editor Julian Assange.

    The important question is who controls and oversees the selection, distribution and editing of released documents to the broader public?

    What US foreign policy objectives are being served through this redacting process?

    Is Wikileaks part of an awakening of public opinion, of a battle against the lies and fabrications which appear daily in the print media and on network TV?

    If so, how can this battle against media disinformation be waged with the participation and collaboration of the corporate architects of media disinformation?

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-is-behind-wikileaks-2/22389

    • Here is your sign from 9/23/1975 Tom Charles Huston Church Committee Testimony

      Tom Charles Huston testified before the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, commonly known as the Church Committee, on the 43-page plan he presented to the President Nixon and others on ways to collect information about anti-war and “radical” groups, including burglary, electronic surveillance, and opening of mail.

      https://www.c-span.org/video/?408953-1/tom-charles-huston-testimony-church-committee

    • Jun 6, 2013 6 Corporations That Control Your Perception

      Abby Martin goes over the 6 corporations that control nearly everything in the mainstream media, and discusses a few of the most famous cases of media censorship with BTS producer, Manuel Rapalo.

      https://youtu.be/0hxMaAAmaX0

  • Charlie Primero

    > “…another less visible but highly motivated camp realizes Hillary and her neo-con agenda would severely damage the nation’s security and its global influence.”

    Bullcrap. The “Deep State” is not Nationalist, seeking to empower or strengthen the United States.

    The Deep State is Globalist, seeking to transform the U.S. into a giant slave plantation like China, consisting of a tiny group of ultra-wealthy elites ruling over a great unwashed mass of dumbed-down worker bees.

    • Jovitajmurphy4

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj107d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj107d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash107NetworkSearchGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj107d:….,……

  • ICFubar

    Certainly Comey would not have acted unless more powerful interests had told him to act on the newest Clinton and staff email criminality. What this signals is open to conjecture but a change in foreign or domestic affairs agenda by the Deep State is unlikely. I see this as perhaps an effort to moth ball the Clintons from public [sic] service so that the whole of their criminal actions and those criminal actions of the Deep State will not come into purview by the public further damaging and ripping open the thin veil that the Deep State operates behind. It is far better that the Clintons go down quietly than in a public manner exposing the total criminal corruption of Washington in conjunction with those behind the scenes that operate all the levers of power of the USA Ltd. The tell will be if the MSM turns on the Hillary in some mild manner,so as not to upset her failed seeking of the Oval Office and enticing her to spill all the beans, and with a message from her controllers that she should settle for what she has gotten to date with a carrot or two added and call it a day. Vote rigging in her favor and complaints thereof will also stop if the Deep State means to jettison her candidacy. Something is definitely going on in the backrooms of this you can be sure.

  • I use Linux OS, and TOR Browser, but some sites can be accessed using Chrome browser via bridge sites. If you watch my videos you will see me do that, for some sites, but only for ones I know don’t have highly illegal content.

  • “Deep Web” means anything that can’t be found on q normal search engine. The deeper you go, through more layers of encryption, the darker the content becomes. Hence the Dark Web