Clinton claims ‘consistency;’ 13-minute video documents eight huge lies, flip-flops. Americans: this is all you’ll ever get from .01% ‘leaders’ until you end this US rogue state with arrests

Global Research’s sharp 13-minute video documents Hillary Clinton’s lies and flip-flops on these topics:

  • Same-sex marriage.
  • Whether she’s progressive or moderate.
  • Claimed she turned over all State Department e-mails when that total is less than 1%.
  • Claims she “went to Wall Street and said cut it out” while she takes money from those she claims to “criticize” (as if “cut it out” represents leadership and legal power to stop illegal activity).
  • Blames victims of mortgage fraud when those offering the contract are legally responsible for ethical verification.
  • Former universal health care support in rhetoric, then attack Sanders on that very policy position.
  • Claims she “mis-spoke” about being “under sniper fire” in Bosnia after being documented making the claim on five occasions.
  • Supported NAFTA and blocked opposition. Now claims to be a critic of NAFTA and lies about previous support.

Americans who vote for Hillary (or Trump) are voting to continue the following policies of a US rogue state, with 95%+ who would never agree if honestly briefed on the facts:

  • The wars are Orwellian unlawful; not even close to legal. If there’s one law responsible citizens must know, and to honor the awful sacrifices of all our families through not one but two world wars, it’s war law. Did you know?
  • The real solutions to correct the Robber Baron-era system are monetary reform (direct creation of debt-free money for productive infrastructure) and public banks (at-cost and in-house credit to reduce government borrowing costs by 50%). For just one example: if your state had their own bank with a 5% mortgage and credit card, all state taxes are abundantly paid for, with no other taxation ever needed. The benefits of just a few reforms are conservatively calculated to $1,000,000 per average US household. Literally, you have nothing more valuable for your time than to learn this. Did you know?

Of course, almost all Americans don’t know.

I use rogue state in its academic meaning: a nation constantly breaking international law with both threat and harm to others, ruled by authoritarians who restrict rights and proliferate weapons of mass destruction. Since WW2, Earth has had 248 armed conflicts. The US started 201 of them (81%). These ongoing illegal Wars of Aggression have killed ~30 million and counting; 90% of these deaths are innocent children, the elderly and ordinary working civilian women and men. The sum of 30 million means the US has war-murdered more than Hitler’s NazisDid you know?

If you need further evidence of election fraud through unaccountable electronic voting machines, “leadership” and corporate media manipulated primaries, and the general characteristics of both Clinton and Trump beyond being illegal rogue state supporters driving We the People further and further into debt slavery, look herehereherehereherehereherehere for further documentation as clear as we’ve covered so far.

There is an alternative to voting for bullshit democracy: Demand .01% arrests

The responsible citizen response to these Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes centered in war, money, and lies is to demand arrests of US Left and Right .01% leaders.

Please read that sentence again to appreciate its elegant power and truth.

The alternative is to lie to one’s self, nation, and global community to allow ongoing crimes that annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions. This is not a responsible alternative, let alone to take the criminal fraud further to vote the Left or Right’s chosen puppet to bullshit for further crimes.

In fact, unless one wishes to condone, bond, and join such evil and bullshit, one cannot vote for it. If one wishes to stand as an American under our ideals and Constitution, one must demand arrests for such outrageous crimes.

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere).

**

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Brockland A.T.

    Before running off to make arrests for Mr. Herman, be advised that real veterans and police officers bound to their oath to defend the Constitution appear to prefer lawful non-compliance, not including arrests.

    OATH KEEPERS: ORDERS WE WILL NOT OBEY

    1. We will NOT obey orders to disarm the American people.


    2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people
.

    3. We will NOT obey orders to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to military tribunal.


    4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state.


    5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.


    6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps.

    7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext.


    8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control.”


    9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies.


    10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances.

    https://www.oathkeepers.org/declaration-of-orders-we-will-not-obey/

    • Carl_Herman

      What is war law, Brockland? Please summarize what the two US treaties state.

      Please state a reasonable argument under war law that the wars are lawful. Or, if you agree they are unlawful, please state a reasonable argument that those leaders of the war should not be arrested for war-murdering millions of human beings.

      Please also advise us of your conversations with Oath Keepers on this point. And also, please note that the closing video is of former US Marine Ken O’Keefe calling for arrests.

      • Brockland A.T.

        Is Ken O’Keefe an Oathkeeper and what arrests has he made recently?

        You said you had the answers if I didn’t smart guy.

        Prove it. What are the treaties and what do you think they mean?

        • Carl_Herman

          Ken is a real veteran calling for arrests; I don’t know his status with Oath Keepers.

          Although individuals can make a citizen’s arrest, I recommend exactly what I state: public demand for those with that authority to exercise it, and for the crimes listed (the actual list is longer).

          We just had this conversation about war law on another article, with so far your refusal to respond to both my explanation and link to war law: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/07/expert-report-evidence-proves-election-fraud-bernie-won-democratic-nomination-enough-01-rogue-state-crimes-demand-arrests-need-lies-looting-wars.html#comment-215131

          I’ll copy that response for you: “The documentation of war law is here: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/seizing-an-alternative-obviously-unlawful-usuk-wars-of-the-present-2-of-7.html

          In one sentence: two treaties after each of the two world wars make military attack illegal unless under armed attack by another nation’s government.”

          And then from that link:

          “Two world wars begat two treaties to end nations’ armed attacks forever. They are crystal-clear in content and context:

          Kellogg-Briand Pact (General treaty for renunciation of war as an instrument of national policy as official title)

          United Nations Charter.

          Both are listed in the US State Department’s annual publication, Treaties in Force (2013 edition pages 466 and 493).

          Article Six of the US Constitution defines a treaty as US “supreme Law of the Land;” meaning that US policy may only complement an active treaty, and never violate it.”

          • Brockland A.T.

            I gave my response. To save time I’ll cut and paste from that thread.

            “If I saw someone attacking my child, I would do as described above. Stop the violence and find out what is going on and determine what, if any criminal justice measures need be called upon.

            However, a citizen’s arrest would not top my list. No matter how justified one thinks it may be, making a citizen’s arrest leaves one open to all kinds of legal grief, especially if you happen to be wrong, morally or by some legal technicality.

            http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/blog/perform-citizens-arrest/

            Again, nothing in your interpretation of the laws of war provides directly for arrests of warmongers. Even world leaders tread carefully here.

            Feel free to add your support to Captain Michael Nathan Smith’s legal challenge as to the legality of Obama’s war on the Islamic State.

            http://www.nysun.com/foreign/lawsuit-against-obama-exposes-the-absurdity/89581/

            Notice the good captain is going through proper channels to demand an investigation and ruling, and not unilaterally making arrests.

            Also feel free to support Sundus Shaker Saleh lawsuit against the Shrub regime for plotting Iraq War II. Notice she’s not making any citizen’s arrests.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saleh_v._Bush

            Mr. Herman, your calls for unilateral arrests and defense of such reckless actions are absurd and you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.”

            To add, if you’ve ever promoted these cases, they were probably lost in the background buzz of your general call for arrests by whomever you think it is that’s supposed to be making arrests. Apparently without proper investigation, yet.

          • Carl_Herman

            You still haven’t examined the “Emperor’s New Clothes” obvious illegality of the wars, Brockland. For maybe the fourth time: what is war law? Please summarize it, as it is meant to be as clear as “stop sign” law or the rule of when a baseball runner is or is not safe at first base.

            Again: if someone ATTACKED YOUR CHILD that is cause for arrest, and exactly analogous to the US/UK/Israel ATTACKING millions of children as an immediate cause for arrest. Your “proper investigation” to defend your child would last about a second, then you would act to stop the crime of attack with most parents demanding arrest of the attacker. When you know war law, war history that includes awful sacrifices of all our families (I know my family sacrificed much, Brockland), then a “proper investigation” takes about as long as reading the facts of the paper I was invited by the Claremont Colleges to present to 2,000 international guests last year. War law: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/seizing-an-alternative-obviously-unlawful-usuk-wars-of-the-present-2-of-7.html

            But, Brockland, until you look for yourself at the clarity of war law, you’ll be unable to state it, and therefore unqualified for informed opinion of what is and is not “reckless actions,” “absurd,” and ironically having “no idea what you are talking about.”

            Pointing to others whose documentations doesn’t include demanding arrests IS NOT demonstration of the law, facts, and rational basis to determine if there is or is not clear violation of law.

            Those of us working to explain, document, and prove clearly illegal Wars of Aggression demonstrate leadership that you are blind to until you look for yourself at the law and facts, Brockland. Are you ready to look yet? If so, what is war law?

          • Brockland A.T.

            … You really don’t get it. What’s more you’re attempting to exert non-existant authority over myself with weenie posturing the same way you think your personal interpretation of the law has any legal standing despite not having been won so in any court of law.

            Almost every war the United States has ever fought has been under the hubris of self-defense with no choice but to fight. Take your little essay(s) and make your arrests, or more practically, take the U.S. government to court and make them stop going to war, if you think its so slam dunk.

            The Geneva Conventions are far more specific in what is and isn’t a legal action in war. They are still violated, and someone has to go to court for remedy even to start an accountability process, if there is no voluntary consent to accountability by the offending party.

            https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0365.pdf

            Kellog-Briand Pact full text:

            http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/imt/kbpact.htm

            Nowhere are there provisions for enforcement or any ‘arrest’ procedures or penalties spelled out for violation of goodwillspeak. There’s not even any provisions to go to court; its just the traditional way things are done in other matters of international law.

            The UN Charter:

            http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/

            Provision for enforcement seems to be is left to the Assembly, in particular the UN Security Council and particularly particularly the five permanent veto-wielding members.

            Which just as well may be provisions for un-enforcement, as its tantamount to having the foxes guard the henhouse for the wolves. Again, go make your case twith the Hague.

            Hilary Clinton obviously plans to escalate hostilities in Syria and Ukraine, clearly threatening the lives of many children, and tens of thousands of children right now are suffering under attack, because of her and her Neocon masters warmongering, and there’s the off-chance of a nuclear WWIV.

            Yet your precious conscience won’t let you vote Donald Trump, because Jill Stein is the more moral individual. So even if Hilary becomes President as a result, you think your conscience in clean. At least your dearth of reasoning skills is consistent.

            The purpose of elections is clear. Elections are not about who is the most moral candidate, they are about who gets the most votes and wins. The voter’s morality is on trial – who will the voter allow, by action or inaction to win, to the best of their ability.

            The laws of war are clear – they are an agreement in principle every bit as abstract as the Uniformed Oath to the Constitution and subject to legal interpretation.

            A commitment not to make wars of aggression, and if done so anyway, to wage them humanely, do not in and of themselves always spell out directly arrestable offenses. You’re conflating national warmongering policy laid out with carefully spun hubris with a comrade-in-arms brazenly executing prisoners. The moral obligation to stop either exists, but not always direct material means.

            Laws of war treaties appear to grant right to legally demand investigation for offense and if found sound, seek remedies, that may include arrests, of specific official-level perpetrators for specific punishments according to international law or domestic law.

            However, if you think its so simple as an intentional tort, prove it. Make your arrests or use your legal argument to compel accountability on the MIC with a court order.

            All these years, and all those peace activists and wronged nations had to do was read Carl Herman’s interpretation of just two treaties from the corpus of ‘laws of war’.

            You’re really that full of yourself that you made legal discoveries all on your own that no-one else ever considered?

          • Carl_Herman

            With your first claim: the Kellogg-Briand Pact (Renunciation of War) was used to prosecute Nazi Germany.

            You argue the Orwellian, that laws are not laws and there are no rules that cannot be interpreted anyway the dictator wishes. You wrote:

            “The laws of war are clear – they are an agreement in principle every bit as abstract as the Uniformed Oath to the Constitution and subject to legal interpretation.”

            You are unfamiliar with the history of scholars, attorneys and even a fellow-author on Washington’s Blog (David Swanson) who point out that your position of war law not meaning anything (or any law) is rejected by all but the .01% liars who take advantage of people like you.

            Ethical law is meant to be as clear as traffic law or baseball rules, with the purpose for groups to achieve desired outcomes. The more important the topic, the more important certain rules are clear, with no more important topic than to prevent war-murder. The documentation colleagues and I provide show war law is crystal-clear in letter and intent, and only allow armed attack when under attack by another nation’s government.

            But go ahead, Brockland: take your stand that there is no cause for arrests on these lie-started and illegal wars because law can always be spun to suit the empire. Go ahead and argue that all our families’ sacrifices in two world wars led to zero accomplishment to clearly state what is and is not lawful use of military.

            Americans are smart enough to choose the best option when the choice is clear.

            I appreciate your help for interested readers to understand your position and tone, and its contrast from my essays and comments.

          • Michael Riley

            Hi Brockland,
            You stated “Almost every war the United States has ever fought has been under the hubris of self-defense with no choice but to fight”

            Sir our entry into conflicts between Germany in both WW1 & WW2 had absolutely nothing do to with self-defense. At the height of Germany’s power they never had the capability to attack America. Also I can show you the speeches and documentation of Hitlers many attempts to avoid war with Britain and Russia.

            Most people don’t even know Rudolf Hess flew a plane into England with the sole objective to persuade Churchill for a peace agreement. But Churchill would have none of it, and threw poor Mr Hess in prison.

            The truth of what happened in Germany has been so fabricated by the Zionist-Globalist Governance Cabal that people think that little history lesson they received in school is the truth. It’s not. http://rudolfhess.net/

            Our country was manipulated into both wars by the same Zionist-Globalist Governance Cabal that Carl_Herman is referring to. The same with the Korean and Vietnam conflicts.

          • Brockland A.T.

            Sorry for the imprecision and delay in response; you replied to Herman not myself, so I had no notice of reply.

            The defensive wars comment was a general statement.

            America entered WWI ostensibly because of the sinking of the Lusitania. While not clear-cut self defense, the ship carried Americans, the Germans were warned not to harm Americans under any circumstance, and there were concerns over German unrestricted submarine warfare. It was never confirmed until decades later that the Lusitania indeed carried war materiale. The People believed and were motivated by a lie similar to self defense; German took a shot at them and HAD to be stopped.

            https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2015/03/27/germany-gave-a-warning-so-why-was-lusitania-full.html

            America entered WWII ostensibly because Japan launched an unprovoked surprise attack. Again it was not until decades later that it became widely know the attack was both deliberately provoked and staged insofar as the Pearl Harbour attack was foreseen, detected, and allowed to succeed unknown to the base commander. Again, the people were motivated by something very much like a lie of self-defence; Japan took an unprovoked shot at America and had to be stopped.

            Similarly Vietnam, with the Tonkin Gulf false flag; again, no real threat, but an attack on the country just had to be defended against and there was the evil communist menace and all.

            The level of threat was never commensurate with response. Even the original sin, the Jamestown Massacre, was provoked by repeated raids upon Indian settlements till the Powhaten figured they’d teach the English a lesson, but made the mistake of thinking it would stick.

            Although calling disproportionate responses to instigated attacks is not properly self defense, staging the illusion of receiving first blood, justifying any level of righteous response, plays on the sentiment of ‘self defense’, even if the public motivation is really closer to revenge.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_massacre_of_1622#Aftermath

  • PERS ponzi 1st repsonders

    …..
    $$$$$$$$$$$$
    ………………
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,……..////
    ………………..
    ,.,

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
    ,,,,,,,,,,,,
    ………..
    ………………..
    …..
    Clinton dealing in uranium acquired in BLM land grabs

    wait til the entire country learns what is really happening
    .
    .
    .
    …………
    ………..

    this BLM group which includes harry reid and clinton have come up with a very complex scam.

    it uses the fbi and nevada city council and county commissioners
    who racketeer together in order to take land from people to sell to foreign investors by making it look like the ranch owners have broken the law
    when they have not.
    harry reid has a land grab partner named richard bryan who was a Nevada senator. richard bryan ran a lawfirm in nevada called lionel sawyer collins.
    richard bryan sold bundy’s land to the chinese.
    bryan took millions of dollars from Chinese solar clients who
    secretly purchased bundy’s land before the land grab attempt.
    reid and bryan sold the land because the Chinese needed it for minerals to make solar panels .
    BUT….the land grab backfired .. it did not go as reid and bryan planned.
    ..
    reid and bryan had local county commissioners de-value bundy’s land at only $3.4 million when bundy ranch is worth around $50 million .

    so…… through reid orchestrated federal mumbo jumbo and his internal govt agency trickery.
    reid tried to take the bundy land after reid and bryan pocketed the Chinese
    money.

    but blm was not abe to evict bundy…….

    …………….

    because reid and bryan were unable to deliver on the bundy land sold to chinese.
    reid/bryan filed bankruptcy at lionel sawyer collins to prevent having to give the chinese back their millions in bundy land purchase money….
    .
    cover up .
    bryan allowed the Lionel sawyer Collins law firm to file for bankruptcy
    and ruchard bryan relocated quietly to another lawfirm
    …………
    eventually the oregon land grab will reveal reid and bryan handle mineral deals for hilary clinton’s daughter’s husband……………
    ..
    chelsea’s husband who has Russian clients who deal in buying BLM acquired land plentiful in earth minerals.

    recap
    BLM’s bundy ranch land grab
    was attempted because reid and senator richard bryan failed to acquire bundy land for chinese solar investors .
    after richard bryan’s law firm went bankrupt because they could not pay
    back the retainer to the Chinese solar clients who did not get bundy land .
    .
    the bundy land grab scam organized by reid and his mormons
    has not even been fully exposed yet.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkWTOxPbxqc

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbJ0HPL0o2A

    ……………………………………………

    selling the presidential election on a grand scale.
    while making it appear as though nevada is hosting the democrat and republican conventions or debates
    .
    in reality simply selling/rigging the election out the back door. to highest bidders
    .
    would harry reid be part of a scam. ?
    harry reid could run this out of a payday loan business’ in nevada to launder money.
    a hard to trace bribe scam,
    rawle’s pay day loan business
    is where harry reid laundered his previous million dollar bribe through.
    who would ever find out ?

    ………..
    emails surface exposing reid accepting bribes.
    .
    reid bribe was initially $2 million dollars.
    .
    .
    Swallow wanted $2 million to enlist Harry Reid’s help to block online gaming investigation .
    .copies of emails show Swallow worked to arrange meetings between Johnson and top Utah officeholders.
    Then, with the FTC investigation continuing, Johnson said Swallow
    suggested Harry Reid could make all the problems with regulators go away — for a
    price.
    “I said, ‘OK, what do I need to do?’
    He’s like,………. ‘OK, it costs money,’
    ” Johnson said, Swallow was adamant he make a deal.
    “he told me, he has a connection with Harry Reid,’ ” Johnson said.
    He said Swallow wanted $2 million to enlist Reid’s help.
    But he did not have the money, Johnson
    said, so they eventually agreed on $300,000 upfront and $300,000 later.
    Swallow put Johnson in contact with Rawle, whose company has
    operations in Nevada. Rawle had given generously to Swallow’s failed
    congressional bids and hired Swallow as Check City’s lobbyist and
    in-house legal counsel, a position Swallow held until he became chief
    deputy attorney general in December 2009.
    Rawle, died of cancer before federal investigators could question him
    On Sept. 29, 2010, Swallow sent an email to Johnson with the subject line “Mtg. with Harry Reid’s .”
    ” Traveling to LV tomorrow and will be able to meet with Reid’s contact,
    who he has a very good relationship with. He needs a
    brief narrative of what is going on and what you want to happen….I don’t know the cost, but it probably won’t be cheap.”…

    eric holder blocked the american people from learning harry reid took a million bribe.FBI
    agents working alongside Utah state prosecutors in a wide-ranging
    bribery corruption investigation have uncovered wrongdoing by two
    of the U.S. Senate’s most prominent Mormon figures — Majority Leader
    Harry Reid and rising Republican Sen. Mike Lee — but Eric Holder and the Justice
    Department has thwarted their bid to launch a full federal
    investigation.

    The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,
    shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for,
    and
    Conviction of,
    Treason,..
    Bribery,..
    or other high Crimes
    and
    Misdemeanors.
    Article II, Section 4
    ……………………………..
    who got the biggest kickback ?
    Harry Reid personally bypassed DHS terrorism laws on behalf of son’s casino project
    Senate Majority Leader Sen. Harry Reid took an intense interest in
    pushing through visas for dozens of shady Asian investors for a Las
    Vegas casino represented by his son, Rory Reid, documents and reports
    show.
    The investors, who were flagged under terrorists guidelines for “suspicious financial
    activity,” had initially been denied visas by the Department of Homeland
    Security in a process that does not allow for appeals.
    In a Dec. 5, 2012 email to officials at the Department of Homeland
    Security obtained by The Washington Times, U.S. Citizenship and
    Immigration Services (USCIS) Legislative Affairs official Miguel
    Rodriguez wrote, “This one is going to be a major headache for us
    all because Sen. Reid’s office/staff is pushing hard and I just had a
    long yelling match on the phone.”
    The investors were renovating the SLS Hotel — which was
    once the Sahara. SLS is represented by Sen. Reid’s son, Rory Reid, who
    works
    at the law firm Lionel, Sawyer & Collins. In their 2012 “Year in
    Review,” the Nevada firm hyped “Lionel Sawyer & Collins” benefits
    from working with Harry Reid .
    “Rory Reid’s previous experience as chairman of the Clark County
    Commission is put to good use assisting with general legal advice for
    the law firm and helps circumvent the maze of regulations
    required to access economic incentives offered on the state and local
    levels,” the article, called “Redeveloping a Classic Strip Property,” continued.
    When
    questioned on Sen. Reid’s intervention on behalf of SLS investors, Sen.
    Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman told Ralston Reports —
    where Rory’s connection was first reported — that “The SLS project
    is none of your business”
    “That is the calculus in Sen. Reid’s support of the project,” Orthman continued.
    “We have a long-standing office policy that strictly bars any member of
    the staff’s family or the Senator’s family from lobbying our office on
    behalf of their clients. That policy applies in this case.”
    Initial attempts by Sen. Reid’s office to expedite the visa requests
    were denied on Dec. 17, 2012, prompting the majority leader to
    personally call Obama who contacted USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas.
    “Within a few short weeks of Mr. Reid’s personal DHS intervention, the
    decision not to issue the visas was reversed, allowing the hotel to
    secure
    major funding from JP Morgan Chase,” the Times reports.Sen. Reid “has
    supported Lionel Sawyer & Collins a spokeswoman for the senator told
    the media
    ……………………………………

    October , 2010
    Reid terrorist ties cover up
    “An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    repeatedly lied to federal immigration and FBI agents and submitted
    false federal documents to the Department of Homeland Security to cover
    up her illegal seven-year marriage to a Lebanese national who was the
    subject of an Oklahoma City Joint Terror Task Force investigation.”
    what is odd is that no criminal terrorist charges are brought against
    rory for his SLS clients or the long history of the lionel sawyer
    collins lawfirm facing the same terrorist charges.

    for some convenient reason LAST MONTH the law firm was allowed to skate
    around the feds and quietly just vanish out of sight and relocate to
    Arizona
    while harry reid (taxpayers stuck funding it ) handled the DHS terrorist
    scandal fall out & cover up here in nevada.
    ………………………………
    October , 2010
    Reid terrorist ties cover up
    “An aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    repeatedly lied to federal immigration and FBI agents and submitted
    false federal documents to the Department of Homeland Security to cover
    up her illegal seven-year marriage to a Lebanese national who was the
    subject of an Oklahoma City Joint Terror Task Force investigation.”

    ………………………………..

    eventually the public will learn harry reid used the FBI to block investigations into his well organized multi billion dollar corruption schemes which took place within the country known as deseret.
    harry reid used his ties to the blm as well as his long time friend and previous nevada senator richard bryan who both have now gone into the business of selling land they do not own to Chinese corporations who need raw materials to build solar and electric car batteries.
    harry reid and richard bryan don’t realize the public is not as dumb as they think.
    and the tax exempt corporation known as the mormons who operate the legal system within deseret will also be exposed .
    .
    .
    your govt reminds you……..when you see something say something..

    …………………….

    ……………..,…………………/…………………….,,,,,,,……,.,,.,..,

  • Sarastro92

    We’re screwed. HRC will waltz into office without opposition. Trump is completely inept… It’s plausible that his whole act if a bag job for the Clintons.

    Liberals are ecstatic that a neoCon maniac who allies with jihadi crazies and neoFascist shock troops will take office. At the same time the economy is rapidly contracting, another Wall street Democrat takes office…

    Not a pretty sight.