1-minute video: Obama smirks, plays stupid, denies election fraud; won’t/can’t address President of American Statistical Association’s report documenting Democratic Primary election fraud. Had enough to demand arrests, or prefer dictatorship?

hat tip: Prison Planet

“First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. And then you win.”  ~ Gandhi on British responses to India’s requests for independence, and for British justification of their invasion, military occupation, and theft of resources as “Christian” and helpful (unsourced, and certainly in spirit of Gandhi’s work)

1-minute video:

In smirking denial reminiscent of President W. Bush, President Obama claimed to not know what a “rigged election” means, and that such a thing is a “conspiracy theory.”

Denial and playing stupid are usual first responses of criminal liars, and certainly more plausible than Obama being somehow unaware of widespread coverage of election fraud in the Democratic primaries. This documentation includes a report led by the President of the American Statistical Association (ASA), Fritz Scheuren:

“The difference between the reported totals, and our best estimate of the actual vote, varies considerably from state to state. However these differences are significant—sometimes more than 10%—and could change the outcome of the election.”

Obama’s response is also typical of historical dictators: empty bullshit rhetoric to pacify and propagandize the public, and exactly what Gandhi documented as the response of British officials to justify dictatorial imperialism. This is in sharp contrast to real leadership: commitment to comprehensive facts clearly communicated, with power exercised to uphold just laws.

For more Orwellian government regarding clear evidence of election fraud, please view this 1-minute expert testimony that unaccountable voting machines are a literal “black box” with absolutely nothing to see or count. Please note the distain of the off-screen “official” rather than accountable action for comprehensive factual discovery:

We’ve documented that the US use of electronic voting machines without a paper trail fails to meet the definition of election because it requires physical votes subject to independently verifiable counting (with videos).

We’ve documented that Clinton belongs in prison for support of lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression in key vocal roles as US Senator and Secretary of State; the worst crimes a nation can commit, as well as election fraud in collusion with the Democratic National Committee.

Now, Election Justice USA issued their report of the 2016 primaries, Democracy Lost, with findings that Bernie Sanders won the Democratic primaries, but was denied victory from the following types of election fraud (pg. 95):

1) Targeted voter suppression

2) Registration tampering

3) Illegal voter purges

4) Exit polling discrepancies

5) Evidence for voting machine tampering

6) The security (or lack thereof) of various voting machine types

Their conclusion:

“Based on this work, Election Justice USA has established an upper estimate of 184 pledged delegates lost by Senator Bernie Sanders as a consequence of specific irregularities and instances of fraud. Adding these delegates to Senator Sanders’ pledged delegate total and subtracting the same number from Hillary Clinton’s total would more than erase the 359 pledged delegate gap between the two candidates. EJUSA established the upper estimate through exit polling data, statistical analysis by precinct size, and attention to the details of Democratic proportional awarding of national delegates. Even small changes in vote shares in critical states like Massachusetts and New York could have substantially changed the media narrative surrounding the primaries in ways that would likely have had far reaching consequences for Senator Sanders’ campaign.”

15-minute analysis of Election Justice USA’s report by Lee Camp (adult language):

But this is business as usual for .01% “leaders” in government and necessary corporate media accomplices to “cover” these crimes and to only and always herd We the People into ongoing rogue state empire with bullshit (a serious academic term) lies of omission and commission.

Americans who vote for Hillary or Trump are voting with relative ignorance to continue the following, with 95%+ who would never agree if honestly briefed on the facts:

  • The wars are Orwellian unlawful; not even close to legal. If there’s one law responsible citizens must know, and to honor the awful sacrifices of all our families through not one but two world wars, it’s war law. Did you know?
  • The real solutions to correct the Robber Baron-era system are monetary reform (direct creation of debt-free money for productive infrastructure) and public banks (at-cost and in-house credit to reduce government borrowing costs by 50%). For just one example: if your state had their own bank with a 5% mortgage and credit card, all state taxes are abundantly paid for, with no other taxation ever needed. The benefits of just a few reforms are conservatively calculated to $1,000,000 per average US household. Literally, you have nothing more valuable for your time than to learn this. Did you know?

Of course, almost all Americans don’t know.

This is because US “leadership” isn’t about informing the public in a democratic republic, but to bullshit them to support either the Left or Right arm of one rogue state empire political body.

I use the word bullshit as an academic term from the most recognized living US philosopher’s Bestseller: relentless lies of omission and commission to disinform the public to get their approval through whatever means needed. It must be constantly applied to bury any appearance of comprehensive facts, because those facts will drive public opinion in an uncontrolled direction away from the bullshitters’ parasitic interests.

I use rogue state in its academic meaning: a nation constantly breaking international law with both threat and harm to others, ruled by authoritarians who restrict rights and proliferate weapons of mass destruction. Since WW2, Earth has had 248 armed conflicts. The US started 201 of them (81%). These ongoing illegal Wars of Aggression have killed ~30 million and counting; 90% of these deaths are innocent children, the elderly and ordinary working civilian women and men. The sum of 30 million means the US has war-murdered more than Hitler’s NazisDid you know?

Therefore: a vote for Hillary or Trump continues this bullshit:

  • Lying that “reasons” for war were “the best intelligence at the time” as the worst lie of commission a government can make to wage intentional Wars of Aggression. Or that “Saddam was a bad man” in a lie of omission that he was a CIA asset since 1958, and used in attempt to overthrow Iran’s government after they refused a US-friendly dictator. Or that “Israel has a right to self-defense” as a huge lie of omission to leave out their military siege and armed attacks on Gaza are obvious Crimes Against Humanity.
  • Lying in omission to never ever ever ever ever mention that war is illegal. Expect more lines like, “9/11 changed everything,” “We didn’t choose this war,” “We ended the war in Iraq,” but never to state the US/UK wars were started with known lies, in opposition to UN Security Council Resolutions, and exactly what two US treaties were meant to prevent in crystal-clear letter and intent.
  • Lying in criminal commission from positions of legal fiduciary responsibility to Americans that creating debt is actually “money,” and somehow “good” for us even as it grows to tragic-comic accelerating levels. Lying in omission to never tell Americans that creating what we use for money as negative numbers added forever means the debt can only become bigger over time, with greater and greater debt-servicing costs going to the owners of this scheme. Lying in criminal omission that Benjamin Franklin knew the obvious solutions of creating debt-free money and operating credit as a public service that was so successful he wrote a pamphlet documenting how colonial Pennsylvania’s government operated without charging any taxes. You don’t know this from “official” lies of omission and commission.
  • Corporate media is complicit in this bullshit: six corporations that generate ~90% of what Americans receive for “news” that ongoingly lie in omission and commission in the above topics. The CIA admitted to the US Senate in 1975 they had over 400 operatives controlling US media. Did you know?

If you need further evidence of election fraud through unaccountable electronic voting machines, “leadership” and corporate media manipulated primaries, and the general characteristics of both Clinton and Trump beyond being illegal rogue state supporters driving We the People further and further into debt slavery, look hereherehereherehereherehere for further documentation as clear as we’ve covered so far.

There is an alternative to voting for bullshit evil: Demand .01% arrests

The responsible citizen response to these Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes centered in war, money, and lies is to demand arrests of US Left and Right .01% leaders. Without arrests for obvious crimes, the US is not a constitutional republic, but a dictatorship doing whatever is said by the “leader” when it is said. The choice is between a fair game with clear rules, or an oligarch class ruling sheeple however they dictate.

Please read that paragraph again to appreciate its elegant power and truth.

The alternative is to lie to one’s self, nation, and global community to allow ongoing crimes that annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions. This is not a responsible alternative, let alone to take the criminal fraud further to vote the Left or Right’s chosen puppet to bullshit for further crimes.

In fact, unless one wishes to condone, bond, and join such evil and bullshit, one cannot vote for it. If one wishes to stand as an American under our ideals and Constitution, one must demand arrests for such outrageous crimes.

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states how you may choose to voice “very obvious solutions”: arrest the criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: herehere).

**

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • NobodysaysBOO

    Did he try to have Donald Trump or his family members MURDERED by an undercover FBI dead scumbag,packing a silencer equipped new un numbered handgun, only available from the top?
    You know he did , will barry ever tell anything thats really TRUE? NEVER happen get out there and protest his BLM nasties and boycott his Isralie paymasters.

    • Carl_Herman

      Good point, and thank you for connecting to .01% similar “leaders” in Israel.

      Documentation of Israel’s War Crimes on Gaza: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/seizing-an-alternative-obviously-unlawful-israel-wars-on-gaza-3-of-7.html

      • Patriciajgarza1

        <<rw. ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!ir505m:….,….,.

    • Zap

      I saw that article about the FBI agent but there is no real source for it, the story appeared on one single site and appears to be a hoax.

  • 03.08.2016 Americans are Fleeing the US in Droves

    A rapidly deteriorating political situation, accompanied by shrinking incomes and disastrous social conditions with racial problems to top it all off wouldn’t go unnoticed in any state.

    http://journal-neo.org/2016/08/03/americans-are-fleeing-the-us-in-droves/

    • Brockland A.T.

      Flee further than Canada.

  • Brockland A.T.

    Trump 2016. The only answer to Hilary.

    Trump even wants to let the legal system properly investigate and indict Hilary according to fair due process.

    Which translates into something like Hermanspeak as “lock her up”, except, she really does get a fair trial before being locked up for crimes legally proven to have been committed because Trump is not a fascist in waiting like she probably is.

    • Carl_Herman

      An arrest is a lawful act to stop an apparent crime in commission. Its purpose is to stop the crime, then initiate due process to discover the facts. Brockland makes a straw man argument in that the arrests I call for are to stop what I document as obvious illegal and lie-started Wars of Aggression.

      The need for arrests is to stop further war-murders in action.

      • Brockland A.T.

        Arresting is for cops. Civilians shouldn’t be making arrests. You are are clearly deranged and high on being Great Leader activist blogger. All you’re doing is making sport of serious issues for personal aggrandizement. You are deliberately misleading on the use of arrests.

        http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/blog/perform-citizens-arrest/

        Why citizens arrests are a bad idea:

        “* The person whom you intend to place under arrest may not recognize the authority granted you to make an arrest

        * You’re not a cop

        * The person whom you intend to place under arrest may be armed with a gun, knife or cudgel and may find it convenient to use it against you; as a result you, a bystander or both may become injured or killed

        * You’re not a cop

        * You may have to wait around for a taxi to arrive if you manage to convince the suspect to come with you peacefully, as CrimeFighters strongly suggests you not use your own car to deliver the person to the nearest police station

        * Waiting around too long could lead to charges of false imprisonment, since by definition arresting a person requires their detainment, which is synonymous with imprisonment

        * The act of arresting a suspect, especially when using physical force to do so opens up all manner of potential violations of the suspect’s civil rights, especially since, remember, you’re not a cop, including but not limited to:

        -Charges of sexual assault resulting from a frisk or pat down

        -Charges of assault and/or battery resulting from the use of force during arrest

        – Charges of assault and/or battery charges resulting from any verbal
        abuse, especially threats of violence, used against the suspect

        – Criminal charges in states where the suspect must be convicted for a
        citizen’s arrest to be considered legal (if the suspect isn’t
        convicted)

        – A pretty hefty civil suit from the defendant and/or his or her family”

        • Carl_Herman

          2nd time I’ve pointed out that you misread what I state on this point. From the article:

          “US military, law enforcement, and all with Oaths to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, face an endgame choice:

          Demand arrests, with those with lawful authority to enact it. An arrest is the lawful action to stop apparent crimes, with the most serious crimes documented here meaning the most serious need for arrests.”

          Public demand is their democratic right and responsibility, specifically highlighted in the 1st Amendment to “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” and should be used to stop the war-murders of millions.

          I empower leverage of civic voice for people authorized for arrests to act when the gap between what is legal and what is done is so obvious.

          Thank you, once again, for the escalating ad hominem to help people choose rational responses to lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression.

          • Brockland A.T.

            That’s just it. No one has the authority to act in terms of legal arrests. It hasn’t been established that arrests are how those laws are enforced. In every other criminal situation, the crime and punishment are spelled out.

            Soldiers cannot demand it either; a soldier trying to arrest or demand an arrest a superior or official would probably face and Article 88 under the UCMJ or similar for failing to be properly respectful.

            Attention is being diverted from far more useful action, like Captain Smith’s lawsuit over the AUMF.

            http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-05-06/soldier-suing-obama-over-isis-war-is-doing-fine-lawyer-says

            Furthermore, you deserve every ad hominem doubled and backed with extra colourful metaphors for trying to maintain a farce you wouldn’t personally back with your own career prospects, time and money but expect your readers to join with in ignorance.

          • Carl_Herman

            Have it your way; good luck. You argue that nobody can stop lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression because it hasn’t been done before, and that anyone calling for arrests that officers are trained to apply for illegal orders “deserve every ad hominem doubled and backed.”

            You fail, ongoingly, to read that my invitation for public demand for arrests is for those authorized to make them because the illegal wars are not even close to legal and disclosed as lie-started. These people are already paid with our tax money, and I’ve invested a lot of time to make this clear so that nobody is “in ignorance.”

            You present an alternative of a lawsuit from a military officer continuing illegal wars with an argument that Congress must reauthorize the illegal wars to be lawful. AUMF states that it must honor all US treaties, so it’s in Orwellian opposition to those armed attacks.

            Explain, Brockland, how the action you advocate is helpful.

          • Brockland A.T.

            Idiot preening weenie you just formally confirmed no understanding of arrests as part of a system of formal legal due process.

            You can’t arrest someone for a non-arrestable offense and breaking most treaties is not an arrestable offense. Anyone so arrested (with competent legal counsel) would be out within 48 hours on habeus corpus for lack of charges.

            First Great Leader calls upon people to make arrests and join him in brainless empty action he himself has no personal time for. Then, Herman deflects well-justified criticism of his preening weenie character towards others not intended to be criticized. Then, dismissing the actually useful action of Captain Smith’s lawsuit because it doesn’t flatter Herman’s personal conceit… there are no polite ways to describe your lack of character, Herman.

            Arrests are part of a legal process, as in part of the legal system administered by the courts.

            Calling any American war illegal and therefore subject to criminal justice are two items with no legal standing because the courts are bound by separation of powers not to adjudicate a political issue.

            A political issue is ‘nonjusticiable’. Breaking war treaty obligations are not yet defined punishable as criminal acts. They are prosecuted politically or in civil court, not criminal court.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_question#Foreign_policy_and_war

            Captain Nathan Smith’s lawsuit, if successful, might at least define the IS war as illegal and so orders stemming from it can be acted upon as unlawful orders. Legislative and judicial accountability may need to finally address the gap between treaty law and treaty enforcement.

            However, you are the last person who should be entrusted with making any call on the power of arrest.

          • Carl_Herman

            Thank you, as always, for the abundant insults and straw man argument to misrepresent what I wrote. Let’s be clear on our positions:

            Me: just as if someone drove ~40 mph through a stop sign, we don’t need a police officer, lawyer, or judge to determine the law was broken. Wars of Aggression are this obvious, including for treason and murder of military lied-into illegal wars (there are likely dozens of crimes connected). One thing anyone who cares can do is educate themselves, speak, and act for justice. This includes a demand for those with Oath-sworn authority to simply do the job they’re paid our tax dollars to do: enact arrests.

            You: you defend a lawsuit to continue the wars while asking a federal judge appointed by the same President engaging the wars as remedy. The bottom line, Bro, is that you insult those of us clear enough on the law to demand justice. You want the law to be dictated to you from within a lying criminal system. You see no value in the public driving a wedge between the criminals and their unwitting minions who would act for justice if they were aware and given the opening.

            There will come a time when you wished you didn’t defend “just following orders.”

          • Brockland A.T.

            If I didn’t hand you a pretense of ‘win by ad hominem’, far fewer of my posts would survive ‘moderation’. Be assured you are indeed a preening weenie poseur patriot as a copnsequence.

            Anyone can check with the local law book and record of jurisprudence and find a specific law and specific remedy for speeding and how determinations of speeding are fairly made. Unless you are black or a poor white. Then you’re hosed.

            A war may be illegal… but what’s the remedy? Provisions such as those found in the UN Charter are structured to be non-justiciable; to be given over to politicians and officials to decide, not the courts.

            Which means, politicians and officials must demand proper inquiries, with evidence taken to grand jury to insure a fair burden of proof is met, and fair trial then given.

            At present, no law exists to directly arrest an official engineering things like illegal wars and war profiteering.

            Feel free to demand clear laws and enforceable laws but a legal arrest is not presently possible in the system, and stepping outside the system at that level can only mean coup and revolt.

      • Bev

        Disqus has not posted my comments here or on other forums in a long while. I doubt this will take, but just in case…

        Thank you Carl for promoting the brave and truthful work of Election Justice USA. Everyone should promote them by spreading their research everywhere. Bernie Sanders won.

        http://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Assange-Confirms-Murdered-in-General_News-Democrats-DNC_Julian-Assange_Murder_Wikileaks-160810-423.html

        August 10, 2016
        Assange Confirms: Murdered DNC staffer was Wikileaks’ source
        Quicklink submitted By Rob Kall

        In July, DNC staffer Seth Rich was gunned down in northwest D.C. Police said his murder may have been the result of a robbery. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is saying there is more to the story.

        In an interview with a Dutch media outlet known as Nieuwsuur on Tuesday, Assange admitted that Rich, a staffer in the voter data department of the DNC, was Wikileak’s source within the organization.

        The #DNCLeak led to the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and others. It also further poisoned the attitude of many Bernie Sanders supporters towards Hillary.
        After Rich’s murder, Assange announced that Wikileaks was offering a $20,000 reward for anyone who could provide information leading to an arrest and conviction in Rich’s murder case.

        Did someone order his murder? If so, who?
        ……………….

        And, another person…

        http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/08/sanders-supporters-stunned-by-sudden-death-of-38-year-shawn-lucas-who-served-the-lawsuit-on-the-dnc-and-wasserman-shultz/

        Sanders Supporters Stunned by Sudden Death of 38-Year Shawn Lucas Who Served the Lawsuit on the DNC and Wasserman Shultz
        By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: August 8, 2016

        On Friday, July 1, just ahead of the long Fourth of July weekend, a
        happy, exuberant process server, 38-year old Shawn Lucas of One Source
        Process, served a lawsuit at the Democratic National Committee
        headquarters in Washington, D.C. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of
        Senator Bernie Sanders’ supporters and named the DNC and its then Chair,
        Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as defendants. It leveled the following
        serious charges: fraud, negligent misrepresentation, deceptive conduct,
        unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence.

        The suit seeks class action status and was filed in the Federal District Court in the Southern District of Florida. (Wilding et al v DNC Services Corporation and Deborah ‘Debbie’ Wasserman Schultz; Case Number 16-cv-61511-WJZ).

        A video of the service of process (see embedded video below) shows
        Shawn Lucas saying he was “excited” and “thrilled” to be the process
        server on this lawsuit, later in the video equating it to his “birthday
        and Christmas” rolled into one. A month later, Lucas was found dead on
        his bathroom floor. A cause has yet to be announced.

        As of this writing, we could find no mainstream newspaper or wire
        service that has reported on the troubling death of Shawn Lucas. The original YouTube video, however, has skyrocketed from 32,000 views to more than 350,000 views
        as of this morning. The flurry of angry comments below the video are
        suggesting there is some form of Hillary Clinton hit squad in operation.
        ………..

        http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/08/death-of-shawn-lucas-brings-attention-to-dnc-role-of-prestigious-law-firm/

        Death of Shawn Lucas Brings Attention to DNC Role of Prestigious Law Firm
        By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: August 9, 2016

        A politically connected law firm in Washington, D.C., Perkins Coie,
        may find itself in the embarrassing and reputation-damaging position of
        being named a co-defendant in a high profile case where it is the sole
        legal counsel of record for the defendants. The Federal lawsuit was
        brought by Senator Bernie Sanders’ supporters against the Democratic
        National Committee (DNC) and its Chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, for
        overt acts to undermine the Sanders’ campaign while boosting the
        prospects of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic Presidential nominee.
        Under the DNC’s own bylaws, it must act in a fair and impartial manner
        to all Democratic candidates during the primaries.

        After the lawsuit was filed, Wikileaks released almost 20,000 emails
        that had been hacked at the DNC by an unknown party. The emails
        buttressed the allegations in the lawsuit and created so much media
        notoriety against the DNC that Wasserman Schultz stepped down as Chair
        along with three other DNC executives whose emails were leaked. Multiple
        emails also show lawyers at Perkins Coie engaging in strategy that
        appears to benefit Clinton over Sanders.

        Adding to the growing interest in the lawsuit, a 38-year old process
        server, Shawn Lucas, who served the lawsuit on the DNC at their
        Washington, D.C. headquarters on July 1, was found dead last Tuesday in
        his bathroom of still-to-be-determined causes. The Lucas death came just
        nine days after an attorney for the Sanders’ plaintiffs, Jared Beck,
        released a YouTube video outlining the serious allegations it plans to
        make against Perkins Coie in court. In the video (embedded below), Beck
        reads from an email that had been sent to Perkins Coie on July 25,
        indicating that plaintiffs’ lawyers anticipate the filing of a motion in
        the Federal Court case “to disqualify Perkins Coie LLP (‘Perkins Coie’)
        as defense counsel in this case. It has come to our attention that
        Perkins Coie appears to be a potential material witness and/or defendant
        in this case and, moreover, appears to have a potential disqualifying
        conflict of interest.”

        As of this writing, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner for
        Washington, D.C. is not releasing the cause of death for Shawn Lucas.
        Prior to his death, Lucas had gained social media attention through a video
        released of the service of process. In the video, Lucas compares the
        serving of this lawsuit to his “birthday and Christmas” all rolled into
        one. He happily calls out to the DNC representative who eventually
        accepts the complaint, “Thank you so much, we’ll see you in court.” That
        video has now been viewed over 380,000 times.

  • L Garou

    Thus sprach OBarnum, the man who murdered the Nobel Peace Prize..
    (not a conspiracy)

  • ArtBell

    Good post Carl. The entire world has seen the DNC election fraud and betrayal of Sanders. The puppet masters are getting bolder now, they don’t even care if it is obvious.

    • Carl_Herman

      Thanks, Art. Yes, it seems our Earth-play is moving to easier and easier access to see the parasites in action. Maybe, just maybe, our roles to reveal and provide context will be easier to provide and appreciated. At that stage, we’ll win in an “Emperor’s New Clothes” moment 🙂

  • awb22

    Thanks for the post. My 14 yo daughter and I were discussing voter fraud yesterday.

    I still fail to see where you make the case Trump is a war criminal or committed fraud. What I do see is you are a leftist and wouldn’t support Trump if your life depended on it. While I, on the other hand, see the enemy as the establishment, and advocated a Trump/Sanders split ticket. The Tea Party and the Occupy movement have a common enemy in the status quo.

    This is the first election in modern history where there is a choice between the establishment candidate in Hillary Clinton, and a populist candidate in Donald Trump, and the establishment is shaking in their boots. Carter was the last POTUS to attempt to take on the establishment in DC, the shadow government.

    Tell me, Carl, how did you feel about Ron Paul in 2012? He’s a pacifist, like you. Without his candidacy, Trump would not have succeeded in 2016. Sanders was the Democrat populist candidate in 2016, and he got the same treatment from the Democrats that Paul got in 2012 from the Republicans.

    The American people saw the treatment Paul got in 2012 and Romney was a tainted candidate. The same holds true in 2016 for Clinton. Will the result be the same? If the establishment controls the ballot box, Clinton will win. In 2012 there were two establishment candidates, so they won either way. Election fraud will guarantee their candidate wins in 2016.

    The Brexit vote clears the way for a populist landslide in the US elections. What will the GOP establishment require of Trump before they release the hundreds of millions of dollars of PAC money they contro? That will signal how a Trump administration will act and whether he’s an establishment candidate after all. Reagan talked the talk and we’ve had a succession of progressively worse administrations culminating with Barack Obama. History will record whether Clinton becomes the worst, or whether Trump reverses the trend.

    God help us all.

    • Carl_Herman

      Hi awb22: Thanks for discussing election fraud (not voter fraud?) with family.

      You say that you “fail to see where you make the case Trump is a war criminal or committed fraud.” Good for you, because I didn’t state that at all. And “Leftist” and “pacifist”? Bro: all I can say is that you don’t know me. With all love and respect, you did fail to see exactly what I wrote in the above essay, and while I’m willing to “hope for change” with Trump, I’m grounded in what he fails to state, and our history. This is what I have above, that you’re welcome to comment further upon if that’s helpful for you:

      Therefore: a vote for Hillary or Trump continues this bullshit:

      Lying that “reasons” for war were “the best intelligence at the time” as the worst lie of commission a government can make to wage intentional Wars of Aggression. Or that “Saddam was a bad man” in a lie of omission that he was a CIA asset since 1958, and used in attempt to overthrow Iran’s government after they refused a US-friendly dictator. Or that “Israel has a right to self-defense” as a huge lie of omission to leave out their military siege and armed attacks on Gaza are obvious Crimes Against Humanity.

      Lying in omission to never ever ever ever ever mention that war is illegal. Expect more lines like, “9/11 changed everything,” “We didn’t choose this war,” “We ended the war in Iraq,” but never to state the US/UK wars were started with known lies, in opposition to UN Security Council Resolutions, and exactly what two US treaties were meant to prevent in crystal-clear letter and intent.

      Lying in criminal commission from positions of legal fiduciary responsibility to Americans that creating debt is actually “money,” and somehow “good” for us even as it grows to tragic-comic accelerating levels. Lying in omission to never tell Americans that creating what we use for money as negative numbers added forever means the debt can only become bigger over time, with greater and greater debt-servicing costs going to the owners of this scheme. Lying in criminal omission that Benjamin Franklin knew the obvious solutions of creating debt-free money and operating credit as a public service that was so successful he wrote a pamphlet documenting how colonial Pennsylvania’s government operated without charging any taxes. You don’t know this from “official” lies of omission and commission.

      Corporate media is complicit in this bullshit: six corporations that generate ~90% of what Americans receive for “news” that ongoingly lie in omission and commission in the above topics. The CIA admitted to the US Senate in 1975 they had over 400 operatives controlling US media. Did you know?

      If you need further evidence of election fraud through unaccountable electronic voting machines, “leadership” and corporate media manipulated primaries, and the general characteristics of both Clinton and Trump beyond being illegal rogue state supporters driving We the People further and further into debt slavery, look here, here, here, here, here, here, here for further documentation as clear as we’ve covered so far.

  • LogicalMadman

    Says the guy from Chicago where dead people vote and living people are bused in with 3 changes of clothes so they can vote 3 times.