Studies Suggest Google is Biggest Mind-Control Device Ever Created and is Manipulating in Favor of Hillary

Additional information here:

In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks’ publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department — and what that means for the future of the internet. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code “WIKILEAKS”.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Just like the pretend there is actually two separate parties in D.C. the by the BIG six!

    Jun 29, 2016 Neoconservatives Endorse Hillary Clinton for President Because They Know She’s One of Them

    Neoconservatives like Iraq warmonger Robert Kagan aren’t endorsing Hillary Clinton for president merely because they want rid of Donald Trump, but because she’s one of them, writes Trevor Timm at The Guardian.

  • jadan

    Rankings certainly influence choices for replacement windows or
    parts for your old Ford truck, but some one please suggest a search
    string in which Hillary would be unfairly preferred. Can’t think of one.

  • L Garou

    (aka) “the usual suspects”

  • Brockland A.T.

    I’m not seeing the connection. Google Search on HRC would just reflect the bias of the MSM media, which tends to be pro-Hilary. Unless specific questions were being asked of Google and it was demonstrated that ‘wrong’ answers are suppressed by Google, the study seems spurious.

    A quick general Google inquiry on Hilary Clinton has the latest headline news from the New York Times, NBC, and CNN followed by her Wiki entry, her web site, Twitter. If the leading news services have bad Hilary stories, these will come up, and its a safe bet the New York Times and CNN get a fair amount of web traffic.

    Google ‘Indict Hilary’ or ‘Why Hilary should be indicted’ comes up with indict Hilary stories, but this is not something a Hilary supporter or Hilary neutral would Google. More specialist political news sites come up, but that is to be expected.

    Of course, the study didn’t use Google, but an in-house search engine and cherry-picked sample results that probably proves the power of positive advertising but little more. Real web research asks real questions and follows up leads; not too many casual ‘netizens do that.

    Search results indicating more interest in Hilary over Trump simply indicates more interest in voting Hilary; very likely most people seek to affirm their conclusions, not challenge them.

  • kimyo

    there is only one organization with the ability to provide clinton’s campaign with lists of voters to be purged, as occurred in nyc, california, and many other crucial locales.

    wasserman: we need to invalidate 300,000 likely sanders voters in brooklyn.
    schmidt: here you go, names, addresses, ss#’s, in ascii, separated by commas, ready to merge.

  • Bum Bum

    Another test. Suppose that everyone gets a job and a loan. Guess who benefits most from such a scheme. Aren’t you following the flock?

    The best physicists on Earth agree that everything material is just vibration, and it is actually temporary. The real stuff is our consciousness. People need a lot of effort to comprehend the Reality of the Universe. The evidence is overwhelming. We have eyes – but do we see?