Neoliberalism lowers life expcetancy

By Michael Hudson, Michael-Hudson.com.   Hudson is Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, who has advised the U.S., Canadian, Mexican and Latvian governments as well as the United Nations Institute for Training and Research. He is a former Wall Street economist at Chase Manhattan Bank, who also helped establish the world’s first sovereign debt fund.

“Millions Around the World Fleeing from Neoliberal Policy”, The Real News Network, June 6, 2016.

Economist Michael Hudson says neoliberal policy will pressure U.S. citizens to emigrate, just as it caused millions to leave Russia, the Baltic States, and now Greece in search of a better life.

A research team from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health in New York estimates 875,000 deaths in the United States in year 2000 could be attributed to social factors related to poverty and income inequality.

According to U.S. government statistics, 2.45 million Americans died in the same year. When compared to the Columbia research team’s finding, social deprivation could account for some 36% of the total deaths in 2000.

“Almost all of the British economists of the late 18th century said when you have poverty, when you have a transfer of wealth to the rich, you’re going to have shorter lifespans, and you’re also going to have emigration,” says Michael Hudson, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City.

Many countries, such as Russia, the Baltic States, and now Greece, have seen a massive outflow of their populations due to worsening social conditions after the implementation of neoliberal policy.

Hudson predicts the United States will undergo the same trend, as greater hardship results from the passage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, changes to social security, and broader policy shifts due to prospective appointments to the U.S. Supreme Court and the next presidential cabinet.

“Now, the question is, in America, now that you’re having as a result of this polarization shorter lifespans, worse health, worse diets, where are the Americans going to emigrate? Nobody can figure that one out yet,” says Hudson.

SHARMINI PERIES, TRNN: It’s the Real News Network. I’m Sharmini Peries coming to you from Baltimore.

After decades of sustained attacks on social programs and consistently high unemployment rates, it is no surprise that mortality rates in the country have increased. A research team from Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health in New York has estimated that 875,000 deaths in the United States in the year 2000 could be attributed to clusters of social factors bound up with poverty and income inequality. According to U.S. government statistics, some 2.45 million Americans died in the year 2000, thus the researchers estimate means that social deprivation was responsible for some 36 percent of the total deaths that year. A staggering total.

Now joining us to discuss all of this from New York City is Michael Hudson. Michael is a Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri Kansas City. His latest book is Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy. Michael, good to have you with us.

MICHAEL HUDSON: Good to be back here.

PERIES: So, Michael, what do you make of these recent research and what it’s telling us about the death total in this country?

HUDSON: What it tells is almost identical to what has already been narrated for Russia and Greece. And what is responsible for the increasing death rates is neoliberal economic policy, neoliberal trade policy, and the polarization and impoverishment of a large part of society. After the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, death rates soared, lifespans shortened, health standards decreased all throughout the Yeltsin administration, until finally President Putin came in and stabilized matters. Putin said that the destruction caused by neoliberal economic policies had killed more Russians than all of whom died in World War II, the 22 million people. That’s the devastation that polarization caused there.

Same thing in Greece. In the last five years, Greek lifespans have shortened. They’re getting sicker, they are dying faster, they’re not healthy. Almost all of the British economists of the late 18th century said when you have poverty, when you have a transfer of wealth to the rich, you’re going to have shorter lifespans, and you’re also going to have emigration. The countries that have a hard money policy, a creditor policy, people are going to emigrate.

Now, at that time that was why England was gaining immigrants. It was gaining skilled labor. It was gaining people to work in its industry because other countries were still in the post-feudal system and were driving them out. Russia had a huge emigration of skilled labor, largely to Germany and to the United States, especially in information technology. Greece has a heavy outflow of labor. The Baltic States have had almost a 10 percent decline in their population in the last decade as a result of their neoliberal policies. Also, health problems are rising.

Now, the question is, in America, now that you’re having as a result of this polarization shorter lifespans, worse health, worse diets, where are the Americans going to emigrate? Nobody can figure that one out yet. There’s no, seems nowhere for them to go, because they don’t speak a foreign language. The Russians, the Greeks, most Europeans all somehow have to learn English in school. They’re able to get by in other countries. They’re not sure where on earth can the Americans go to? Nobody can really figure this out.

And the amazing thing, what’s going to make this worse, is the trade, the Trans-Pacific trade agreement, and the counterpart with the Atlantic states. In today’s news there’s news that President Obama plans to make a big push for the Trans-Pacific trade agreement, essentially the giveaway to corporations preventing governments from environmental protection, preventing them from imposing health standards, preventing them from having cigarette warnings or warning about bad food. Obama says he wants to push this in after the election. And the plan is the Republicans also are sort of working with them and saying okay, we’re going to wait and see. Maybe Donald Trump will come in and he’ll really do things. Or maybe we can get Hillary, who will move way further to the right than any Republican could, and bring the Congress.

But let’s say that we don’t know what’s happening after the elections, and the Republicans don’t want a risk. They’re going to do a number of things. They’re going to approve Obama’s Republican nominee to the Supreme Court that he’s already done, figuring, well, maybe Hillary will put in someone worse, or even Trump may put in someone worse. They may go along, at this point, with ratifying a trade agreement that’s going to vastly increase unemployment here, especially in industrial labor, turning much of the American industrial urban complex into a rust belt. And they’re also talking about an October surprise or an early November surprise. It’s the last chance that Obama has, really, to start a war with Russia.

And there’s Stephen Cohen and a number of other sites have warned that there’s going to be a danger when they put in the atomic weapons in Romania. President Putin has said this is a red line. We’re not going to warn. We don’t have an army. We can only use atomic weapons. So you have danger coming not only from domestic decline in population, you have a real chance of war. And Obama has stepped things up. Hillary has, I think, almost announced that she is going to appoint Victoria Nuland as secretary of state, and Nuland is the person who was pushing the Ukrainian fascists in the [inaud.] assassinations and shootout.

So it looks… this trend looks very bad. If you want to see where America is going demographically, best to look at Greece, Latvia, Russia, and also in England. Dr. Miller has done studies of health and longevity, and he’s found that the lower the income status of any group in England, the shorter the lifespan. Now, this is very important for the current debate about Social Security. You’re having people talk about extending the Social Security age because people are living longer. Who’s living longer in America? The rich are living longer. The wealthy are living longer. But if you make under $30,000 a year, or even under $50,000 a year, you’re not living longer.

So the idea is how to avoid having to pay Social Security for the lower-income people, — the middle class and the working class that die quicker, and only pay social security for the wealthier classes that live longer? Nobody has plugged this discussion of lifespans and longevity into the Social Security debate that Obama and Hillary are trying to raise the retirement age, to ostensibly save Social Security. By saving Social Security she means to avoid taxing the higher brackets and paying for Social Security out of the general budget, which of course would entail taxing the higher-income people as well as the lower-income people.

PERIES: All right, Michael. Thank you for your report today, and we look forward to seeing you next week.

HUDSON: Thank you.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Read Professor Hudson's latest books:

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jo6pac

    That’s the neo-liberal plan and just like obomber care. Hurry Up and Die, that’s right after they get every last cent you have.

  • Theodora Angelina

    Thanks for this. Haven’t read Michael Hudson in a while.

    • Joseph Martin

      Great article. Thanks, Theodora.

      “where are the Americans going to emigrate?” I’m not giving up hope that we might turn things around but I think it’s time to come up with a good backup plan. We might need to move somewhere in the U.S. and secede or at least become an autonomous region for starters. I vote for Alaska. It has plenty of room and natural resources and I think could be a viable country.

      • Theodora Angelina

        Liked Sitka a lot. Wonderful collection of icons at Cathedral of St-Michael the Archangel.

        • Joseph Martin

          My brother used to live there and he loved it.

          • Theodora Angelina

            How interesting.

          • Theodora Angelina

            When are moving there for the summer at least?

          • Joseph Martin

            The winters are actually pretty mild in that part of Alaska, aren’t they?

            “Over the course of a year, the temperature typically varies from 31°F to 62°F and is rarely below 21°F or above 68°F.”

            https://weatherspark.com/averages/33055/Sitka-Alaska-United-States

          • Theodora Angelina

            That’s right. Kind of a microclimate.

          • Theodora Angelina

            While we’re waiting for the moving vans and container ships … If you have anything you’d like to add to the discussion on Museum of the TR, please do. Our Schlomo’s doing an amazing job, but then when does he not.

          • Joseph Martin

            Thanks, Theodora.

            I read the comment thread earlier but didn’t actually go to the website. I about swooned when I saw the beautiful Bf 109 photos (although I’m kind of partial to the Fw 190). Are you familiar with Adolf Galland? He flew them all including the Me 262.

            Are you a professional writer or what? Don’t tell me if you would have to kill me.

            As far as joining your and Schlomo’s erudite discussions, I will give it a shot when I’m better rested. But really, “I’m not worthy!”

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e9ff84b95018b11fb956fafd5115911bc75a802f8d15a816ed65df0e259c6c7f.jpg

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Galland

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjaqrPpdQYc

          • Theodora Angelina

            By all means rest up, dear Joseph. Yes, I am familiar with Galland. He was the Kommandant of the Fighter Wing. I also have some photos of the Fw 190 I will put up.

          • Joseph Martin

            Great and thanks, Theodora. How about Hanna Reitsch? I read an excellent book about her that was so amazing it was barely believable. But I do!

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzgCtef-GA0

  • goingnowherefast
  • jadan

    Michael seems to discount Bernie’s chances, and project the continuation of the status quo. Without a radical change of course, this country is going to come apart.

    • kimyo

      if sanders were seriously pursuing the nomination, wouldn’t he have brought the california ‘placebo ballot’ issue to the forefront? by itself, that will award california to clinton. he seems to think he’s participating in the special olympics.

      wouldn’t he be calling attention to obvious voter fraud in multiple states? couldn’t he at least mention the true purpose of the clinton foundation (ex: $$$ for boeing/saudi arabian arms deals)?

      he would, if we were witnessing a primary. what we’re watching is a coronation. which, as of this evening, the ap has declared complete.