Brexit Wins: Why That’s Great News for Europe, Too

By Dan Sanchez, DanSanchez.me.

British voters have elected to leave the European Union in a national referendum. The UK Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage declared Friday Britain’s “independence day.” That is quite a statement given British history. A little over two and a quarter centuries ago, America had its own first Independence Day, and the British Empire was the super-state from which Americans declared independence.

History has come full circle; in a sense, today we are seeing the American Revolution in reverse. In many ways, the European Union is a lever of US global hegemony. By seceding from the EU in spite of threats from Washington, Britain is declaring partial independence from America.

It must be noted that independence is not isolation. This is the key distinction that is intentionally blurred by the “Better Together” rhetoric of the “Remain” camp. When they scaremonger about “leaving Europe,” it conjures images of Britain abandoning Western civilization. But “the West,” as in the US-led alliance of neo-colonial powers, is not the same thing as Western civilization. And the European Union is not the same thing as Europe. Exiting a mega-state in defiance of an imperium is not withdrawing from civilization. In fact, such an exit is propitious for civilization.

Small Is Beautiful

Advocates of international unions and super-states claim that centralization promotes trade and peace: that customs unions break down trade barriers and international government prevents war. In reality, super-states encourage both protectionism and warfare. The bigger the trade bloc, the more it can cope with the economic isolation that comes with trade warfare. And the bigger the military bloc, the easier it is for bellicose countries to externalize the costs of their belligerence by dragging the rest of the bloc into its fights.

A small political unit cannot afford economic isolationism; it simply doesn’t have the domestic resources necessary. So for all of UKIP’s isolationist rhetoric, the practical result of UK independence from the European economic policy bloc would likely be freer trade and cross-border labor mobility (immigration). Political independence fosters economic interdependence. And economic interdependence increases the opportunity costs of war and the benefits of peace.

The Power of Exit

Super-states also facilitate international policy “harmonization.” What this means is that, within the super-state, the citizen has no escape from onerous laws, like the regulations that unceasingly pour out of the EU bureaucracy. But with political decentralization, subjects can “vote with their feet” for less burdensome regimes. Under this threat of “exit,” governments are incentivized to liberalize in order to compete for taxpayer feet. Today we have a victory for Brexit and for the power of exit. That’s good news for European liberty.

During its Industrial Revolution, Britain was a beacon of domestic liberty and economic progress that stimulated liberal reform on the European continent. An independent Britain in the 21st century can play that role again. In doing so, Britain would help Europe outside the EU far more than it ever could on the inside. Brexit may be a death knell for the European Union, yet ultimately the saving grace for the European people.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Business / Economics, Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • tom

    “…the British Empire was the super-state from which Americans declared independence”.

    Britain was hardly a “super-state”, although saying so does tend to inflate the colonists’ achievement in defeating its forces. The population of England grew rapidly from 6.4 million in 1770 to 9.2 million in 1801. The colonies that would become the USA had a population of 2.5 million in 1776, and the USA’s population was 5.24 million in 1800. (These figures are obviously approximate, and ignore Wales, Scotland and Ireland, whose populations were small compared to that of England).

    Startlingly, the population of France in 1800 was nearly 30 million! It was by far the most populous nation in Europe, which helps to explain Napoleon’s ability to conquer most of the continent in spite of heavy losses in many campaigns.

    At the time of the American Revolution, then, the colonies had about one third as many people as the mother country – which had perhaps a quarter as many people as France. It was France that had the best claim to being a “super-state”; only the excellence of the British Navy allowed England to defeat its great rival in many of the battles for colonial possessions.

    Even in America, of course, France was the real winner. Without French military and naval assistance, it is very likely that the rebellion would have been put down and Washington and his associates hanged.

  • Brockland A.T.

    The U.K. made an important first step, but hasn’t left yet. This could drag on for as long as a decade.

    https://www.rt.com/op-edge/348350-uk-eu-us-exit/

    What really needs to happen, is removing the democracy deficit inherent to the EU and the U.K. themselves. Brexit realized would make it more difficult for regressive forces to reinforce one another, but until then, they can collude to defeat the Brexit vote as the A-Z financier class punishes the the U.K..

    https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/sites/default/files/Tackling-Europes-democratic-deficit.pdf

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/may/06/reasons-av-referendum-lost

    The chaos will be used as cover to try and sink the cause of democracy in the EU.