Bernstein – The White House Is Terrified the Clinton Campaign “Is in Freefall”

By Gaius Publius, a professional writer living on the West Coast of the United States and frequent contributor to DownWithTyranny, digby, Truthout, and Naked Capitalism. Follow him on Twitter @Gaius_Publius, Tumblr and Facebook. Originally published at at Down With Tyranny. GP article here.

The last time I featured former Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein on these pages, it was to showcase his delivery of messages he received from the White House, to the effect that the “White House” thought Clinton was blowing it with her Wall Street speeches stance, and because of that, the “White House” was freaking out (to put it colloquially) — at least as Bernstein tells it.

Here’s part of what Bernstein — a Clinton supporter — said last February (my transcript and emphasis; video at the link):

Bernstein: There is a huge story going on. I’ve spent part of this weekend talking to people in the White House. They are horrified at how Hillary Clinton is blowing up her own campaign.

And they’re worried that the Democrats could blow — they are horrified that the whole business of the transcripts, accepting the money — that she could blow the Democrats’ chance for White House. They want her to win. Obama wants her to win.

But Sanders has shown how vulnerable she is. These ethical lapses have tied the White House up in knots. They don’t know what to do. They’re beside themselves. And now, you’ve got a situation with these transcripts a little like Richard Nixon and his tapes that he stonewalled on and didn’t release.

Note the insider tone and access. I’m not writing a hit piece on Clinton; I’m showing this to make a more general point — that Carl Bernstein carries messages from the White House to the public, from Valerie Jarrett perhaps, or someone else just a step removed from the president, and Bernstein is clearly speaking with Team Obama’s permission (and likely encouragement). Which has to mean, with President Obama’s permission.

In other words, this isn’t reportorial digging-and-revealing; this is White House messaging delivered via an intermediary. Read Bernstein as the White House speaking.

In that context, listen to the current “White House” message about the Clinton campaign via Bernstein and video at the top (my italics):

Bernstein: The implications of all of this [the email server issue] are that Hillary Clinton did not want her emails subjected to the Freedom of Information Act or subpoenas from Congress. And that’s why she set up a home-brew server.

I think we all know that. People around her will tell you that in private if you really get them behind a closed door.

I was in Washington this week, I spoke to a number of top Democratic officials and they’re terrified, including people at the White House, that her campaign is in free fall because of this distrust factor. Indeed, Trump has a similar problem, but she’s the one whose numbers are going south.

And the great hope in the White House, as well as the Democratic leadership and people who support her, is that she can just get to this convention, get the nomination — which they’re no longer 100% sure of — and get President Obama out there to help her, he’s got a lot of credibility, it’s an election that’s partly about his legacy.

But she needs all the help she can get because right now her campaign is in huge trouble…

Bernstein goes on to pivot the message against Trump, but we can leave it there.

Bernstein Carrying White House Water

This is at least the second time Bernstein has carried White House messaging about Hillary Clinton’s campaign to the public (see link above for the first), and both times, the message is the same — again colloquially, “we’re freaking out” (Bernstein is nearly as vivid). What freaks them out this time? That “her campaign is in free fall” and they’re “no longer 100% sure” that she can get the nomination.

Wow. Wow that they think it, and wow that they’re leaking to the public that they think it.

Makes you wonder what the White House and other “top Democratic officials” know that they didn’t tell Carl Bernstein, or at least, what he’s not telling us. Maybe this story explains the plan all the networks are alleged (by Chris Matthews no less) to have agreed to — that they will declare Clinton the overall winner the minute the East Coast polls close in New Jersey, even though (or especially because) the West Coast polls are still open in California, the largest state and one which Clinton could well lose.

Put these two things together and it’s clear there’s now just one goal for “top Democratic officials” including the White House — to get Clinton across the finish line despite the fact that her campaign is “in free fall” and she’s limping to get there. In White House terms, to get her into the convention and get her the nomination, no matter how or under what condition.

Two takeaways — one is that top Democrats know how precarious Clinton’s position is. They’re not fooled any more than you are. That’s worth noticing. And second, the White House and Bernstein are not blaming Sanders. Whoever crafted this message for us is blaming the Clinton campaign only, and by extension, Clinton herself.

Again, makes you wonder what they know and if they really know it.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • colinjames71

    Okay, then by “White House”, can we take that (at least) one step further and say “foreign policy establishment”, as well? Trump seems to be a wild card on foreign interventions, although there’s disconnect between what he says and who he’s chosen as advisors and I think his advisors probably indicate not much change there, but why take the chance when you’ve got a guaranteed war monger in Hillary, right? Between the neocons, defense contractors, corporations, Wall Street and career bureaucrats with Clinton ties you’ve got quite the powerful coterie behind Clinton. I hope they’re freaking out, I really do.

    • Jim G

      In my opinion, Trump is “in” because he took on the Republican establishment on foreign policy, which is essentially Hillary’s foreign policy also. Trump has indicated he thought he could establish a friendly relationship with Putin / Russia (no WW III!), we should use tariffs to control imports, bring manufacturing back to the US and thus gain American jobs, wants US citizens to have a sense of sovereignty over our country, opposes the Obama trade pacts, and says European countries would be better off outside the EU. His reputation is that of a non-interventionist. Although I have learned that campaign speeches don’t mean much in practice (think “Change”), I like some of these ideas. They are certainly better than what the establishment has been pushing since Brzezinski (a Democrat!) wrote “The Global Chessboard.” and called for “a new Pearl Harbor” – yes he was the first.

      • colinjames71

        Yeah excellent points, all- those were more or less my exact thoughts until lately. It’s the establishment’s seeming desperation to get him out of the race which piqued my interest in trump in the first place. I guess I’m an anybody but Hillary person at this point, Good comment.

  • Jun 1, 2016 – Clinton May Not Be the Nominee

    Just 6 days before the last set of presidential primary elections, a serious professional is seriously suggesting in the Wall Street Journal that Hillary Clinton may not win the Democrat nomination for President. Doug Schoen, Bill Clinton’s pollster from 1994 to 2000, said in the Wall Street Journal late yesterday that: “it is easier now than ever to imagine a scenario in which Hillary Clinton — whether by dint of legal or political circumstances — is not the Democratic presidential nominee.”

    https://youtu.be/OtkGBE1VXQM

  • diogenes

    Obama and Clinton are both on the leash of Wall Street. Obama’s just slicker.

    • Nexusfast123

      Hard to describe Obama as being slick. Most of the time he looks totally disengaged and bored.

      • colinjames71

        During the last year or so, especially.

  • Jim G

    There are two problems. The first is that she used an unsecured server which is against the law. The other even bigger problem is that “Guccifer” hacked her computer and now the Russians have 20,000 of her emails which they seem inclined to use against her. In an example of what they may contain, in a previous email leak, she 1) lied about Qaddafi giving his troops Viagra so they could rape woman longer – it was made up – and 2) overthrew the government there in support of the banking system which may be having some troubles. That is, Killary took Libya’s petroleum and banks to support our “petro-dollar..”

    https://ellenbrown.com/2016/03/13/exposing-the-libyan-agenda-a-closer-look-at-hillarys-emails/

    I find the implications of what she wrote to be much worse than the fact that she used her own server and got hacked. It shows she bears false witness against others in order to kill them, overthrows another country’s governments, and takes their property (petroleum, banking capital, and gold) away from the people of Libya using contracted terrorists. Hillary is Satan’s favorite mistress.

    • Nexusfast123

      Not just that. It appears she and her cohorts deliberately removed the classification levels of emails. Probably a worse crime than trashing a country in our Kafkaesque world.

  • Jim

    Lots of wishful thinking by both sides that the other candidate is about to implode. My prediction is a very close election that may hinge on last minute reevaluations that both sides are saving to spring on the other. Namely that Trump really is part orangutan and that Hillary had a secret sex change 30 years ago.