4 Reasons the Twin Towers Could NOT Have Been Brought Down With Explosives On 9/11

Preface: We’ve previously shown that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job, because:

  • 9/11 was thoroughly and exhaustively investigated by the 9/11 Commission, Congress and U.S. scientific agencies
  • No one could have foreseen 9/11
  • Government officials didn’t have time to stop the 9/11 attacks, once they realized America was under attack
  • It couldn’t have been a conspiracy, because no one could keep such a big conspiracy secret … someone would have talked
  • Our government wouldn’t do anything like that, and
  • Our free press would have reported on anything that outrageous

See for yourself.

But many people still believe that the World Trade Center buildings which collapsed on 9/11 were brought down with controlled demolition. This essay shows they can’t possibly be right.

I. No One Could Have Planted Bombs In a Crowded Office Building

Conspiracy theorists don’t realize that no one could have planted bombs in a crowded office building like the Twin Towers.

Admittedly, tightrope walker Philippe Petit snuck into the World Trade Center with a friend in 1974 with massive amounts of equipment, smuggled the equipment to the top floor and rigged up a highwire for his tightrope walking stunt without being detected.

And it’s true that in 1978, the 59-story story Citicorp building was secretly retrofitted at night over the course of several months without the knowledge of tenants, the general public, or the media:

And in 2009, Raw Story noted:

A Government Accountability Office investigator smuggled live bomb components into a federal building in just 27 seconds, then assembled a bomb in a restroom and ventured throughout the building without being detected, a leaked tape revealed Wednesday.

In addition, congressional investigators were able to penetrate every single federal building they probed without any difficulty — 10 in all.

And see this.

And we concede that:

  • A tenant of the World Trade Center hired a “sprinkler repairman” shortly before 9/11, and gave him access to 6 underground levels at World Trade Center building 1

The chief electrical engineer who wired the World Trade Centers (Richard Humenn) says that people working on the elevators could have planted explosives:

And mechanical engineer Gordon Ross, in his talk on the destruction of the Twin Towers, pointed out that:

“Those [core] columns which were situated adjacent to and accessible from inside the elevator shafts failed at an early stage of the collapse.

Those columns which were remote from the elevator shafts, and not accessible from the elevator shafts, survived the early stages of the collapse.”*

Indeed, a top demolition expert says that with access to the elevator shaft, a team of loading experts would have access to the columns and beams:

According to USA Today: “On Sept. 11, ACE Elevator of Palisades Park, N.J., had 80 elevator mechanics inside the World Trade Center“.

And the U.S. government agency (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) itself says that, on 9/11, “Elevators 6A and 7A were out of service for modernization“. (NIST NCSTAR 1-8, p.97).

In addition, Ace worked in and around structural steel at the Twin Towers:

A run of approximately 80 vertical feet, employed over 300 running feet of 2-1/2″ x 8″ and 2″x 2″ trough raceway. This run traveled through plaster ceilings, concrete floors and around structural steel.

Indeed, there had been numerous elevator renovation and and asbestos removal projects in the 6 years prior to 9/11 which allowed access to core building structures, including:

But so what?

II. No One Heard Explosions

Conspiracy theorists also ignore the fact that there were no sounds of explosions on 9/11.

Well, there were some:



There are literally hundreds of other witnesses who heard explosions.

Indeed, witnesses heard explosions even before the planes hit …

A hero who saved many people on 9/11, and who was the last person out of the north tower, said that there was a massive explosion from the basement in the North Tower BEFORE the plane hit:

And other witnesses say something similar:

But those videos and witnesses don’t count.

III. The Talk of Mysterious “Molten Metal” Is Wrong

The spokesman for the government agency which says that the building collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) said there was no molten metal at ground zero:

So that puts that crazy claim to rest once and for all. Sure, there were a few contrary reports:

  • And see witness statements at the beginning of this video
  • Indeed, not only was structural steel somehow melted on 9/11, but it was evaporated. As the New York Times reports, an expert stated about World Trade Center building 7:

    A combination of an uncontrolled fire and the structural damage might have been able to bring the building down, some engineers said. But that would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures.

    (pay-per-view). Evaporation means conversion from a liquid to a gas; so the steel beams in World Trade Center building 7 were subjected to temperatures high enough to melt and evaporate them

Well, stuff happens.   Not worth getting distracted from reading about the Kardashians and Caitlyn Jenner.

IV. The Collapse of Three Buildings On 9/11 Wasn’t Suspicious

If the World Trade Center buildings had been brought down by demolition, they would have fallen in an unusual manner.

But that didn’t happen for very long:


And the 60+ structural engineers who say that the World Trade Center buildings were brought down with controlled demolition are obviously closet commies.

Indeed, I dare you to watch this 1-hour video and find a single expert who appears like a normal, credible person (they undoubtedly all live in their Mom’s basement):

So there you have it … 9/11 was not a false flag attack, and the 3 World Trade Center buildings which collapsed on 9/11 could not have been due to controlled demolition.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Aug 29, 2010 WTC 7 Explosion

    One of the surviving videos actually captured the sound of the explosives. Unedited video of ‘WTC-7 collapse’ reveals sound of explosion as collapse starts at Penthouse at the 12 second mark

    Explosion heard at 0:11 mark, just before east penthouse collapse.

    https://youtu.be/XrnmbUDeHus

  • May 25, 2014 FDNY 9/11 Survivor Witness and Whistleblower Speaks on WTC 7

    Listen very carefully starting at the ’20’ second mark! As a firefighter on 9/11, he was at Ground Zero and was there when Building 7 came down. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall, he relives his experience that day, recounting how he believes the buildings in New York were brought down in controlled demolitions.

    https://youtu.be/ePPdUUISQOs?list=UUhwwoeOZ3EJPobW83dgQfAg

  • Sep 11, 2013 9/11 In A Nutshell as James Corbett presents this 5 minute parody of the official conspiracy theory of 9/11

    https://youtu.be/vrJiKbK0tVM

    September 11, 2013 Twelve Years of War, Lies and Deception

    Twelve years after the 9/11 attacks, no credible independent investigation has been done to find out what really happened on that day and who was responsible. Independent journalists and researchers have demonstrated, however, that the official version of the event is nothing but a cover-up, an opinion shared by the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, who declared the Commission was “set up to fail”.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-twelve-years-of-war-lies-and-deception/5349347

  • Brockland A.T.

    Good article. Its important this never goes away, if only to try and discourage more ambitious false flag events.

  • TruthTime

    Most call people “truthers” for questioning any aspects of the U.S. own conspiracy theory put forth by the commission. Since there are 9/11 victim families that also believe the report is hogwash, calling them names seems rather disrespectful – but people that fully believe anything the government says have their heads to far up their ass.

    Also, in regards to this article and the hypothesis that bombs may have been planted, wasn’t there some person or person’s that described seeing vehicles trucking in “something” at night, for many weeks prior? Perhaps a coincidence?

    Hard to be certain of what the truth is though. From a Historical perspective, really the best conspiracies are the ones people get away with – made easier if one is the ruling class. The “winners” write History as they please. With the JFK assassination, even many of those files are locked away for decades for reasons of national”security” – the magic phrase.

  • Demonocracy

    Dont forget the 5 hour documentary, “The New Pearl Harbor”. Leaves no stone unturned.
    http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167

  • Physicsnerd

    This article is complete nonsense.

    • Chris Lannon

      It ruined your whole day did it? Well at least you had the balls to make your profound proclamation. Chin up nerd. There’s always tomorow

      • Physicsnerd

        Nope, didn’t ruin my day. There are many nonsensical articles on the net. Just as there are many wise ass comments like yours.

  • kimyo

    what’s up with the site weirdness? depending on which page you load, this article is titled ‘4 reasons……’ and elsewhere ‘3 reasons….’

    the rss feed doesn’t match the article history. recent comments differ depending on which page you view.

    forgive me for being paranoid, but who’s in charge of what gets displayed here? w’s blog? or the cloud?