America’s & NATO’s Outrageous Behavior, Greatest Threat that Exists

Eric Zuesse

On May 18th, two top people at NATO, one being its current Secretary General — the very top person — laid out in preliminary form the case for war against Russia, which presumably will be presented in more detail at the NATO Summit to be held in Poland on 8-9 July this year.

As if that weren’t bad enough, there’s the matter reported by Bryan Cloughly at Strategic Culture, headlining on May 19th, “Surging Towards yet Another War”, where he pointed out that “The United States has no territorial rights of any sort, in the South China Sea which is 7,000 miles (11,000 kilometres) from its west coast. There is nothing in international law that justifies its unilateral military ‘challenge’ to China’s presence” there, in that area which is contested between five countries: China, Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei. The American government, which has no authority to speak for the entire world regarding international law — of which the U.S. itself has been perhaps the most frequent violator during the past 16 years — isn’t “policeman of the world,” certainly not judge and jury and executioner (well, maybe executioner) of the world, but instead it’s merely an aspiring global thug: “The Pentagon declared on 10 May that China’s ‘excessive maritime claims are inconsistent with international law as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention in that they purport to restrict the navigation rights that the United States and all states are entitled to exercise’.” Cloughly points out that the U.S. “refuses to ratify the Law of the Sea Convention — while ordering every other country to abide by it.”

America’s — and NATO’s — biggest danger to the world, however, is its (their) aggressions against Russia, by:

1: Violating the promise that the agents of U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush made in 1990 to the USSR’s, and then Russia’s, President, Mikhail Gorbachev — and on the basis of which the USSR was dissolved and the Warsaw Pact terminated — that NATO would not be expanded “one inch to the east” (i.e., toward Russia), a promise that was violated by Bill Clinton (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland), George W. Bush (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia), and Barack Obama (Albania and Croatia — with current aspirants being Bosnia, Georgia, Montenegro, Macedonia, and Ukraine). Gorbachev would have had to have been crazy to have ended the Cold War under those conditions if he had known about it — known that GHW Bush and his successor Presidents are a bunch of lying thugs. But because he trusted the word of Bush and his agents (such as James Baker, Francois Miterrand, and Helmut Kohl), Russia is now in this extremely vulnerable position, and Gorbachev himself thus has the lowest approval-rating of all Russia’s rulers since the czars: below even that of Stalin (28%) and Yeltsin (17%). Another poll, of only 20th-Century leaders of Russia (i.e., excluding Putin and Medvedev, both of whom scored atop that other poll), rated Brezhnev the best, and Gorbachev the worst. (That poll included Czar Nicholas II, who, along with Lenin and Khrushchev, rated near 50% approval. The only leader who was almost as low-rated as Gorbachev’s 20% was Yeltsin, at 22%.) Though Gorbachev was a sucker, America’s recent Presidents have been even worse than that — and the entire world is now threatened by what they did (and, under Obama, are doing, perhaps culminating).

2: Overthrowing the secular leader of Libya, who held that nation together and gave it the highest living-standard in Africa — overthrowing Muammar Gaddafi because he was friendly toward Russia — turned that country into a failed state and another festering hotbed for jihadists.

3: Scheming ever since 1949 to overthrow Syria’s secular leaders so as to enable Saudi oil to be pipelined through it into Europe so as to choke off Russia’s largest oil and gas market and hand it to the fundamentalist Saud family who own Saudi Arabia, and the fundamentalist Thani family who own Qatarboth of which families (and especially the Sauds) are top financial backers of jihadists (everywhere but in their own countries), which are America’s best foot-soldiers against the leaders of nations who are friendly to Russia (and in Chechnia were trying to get Putin overthrown). Obama even prioritizes ousting Assad over defeating Syria’s jihadists, as a consequence of which Syria has by far the world’s highest misery-index in Gallup’s polling of 140 nations, and a comprehensive article on the subject noted that “at least 18,000 Syrians have had organs removed during the war thus far” and, “All this tragic human horror only occurs because of an overly aggressive, imperialistic US-Israeli foreign policy creating a path of chaos and destruction across the Middle East and North Africa secretly supporting Islamic terrorists to fight US-Israeli proxy wars to illegally overthrow sovereign national governments like Assad’s.” Unfortunately, that commentator ignored the key fact: that the reason Obama wants Assad overthrown is that Assad supports and is supported by Russia. (Israel’s government might have different motivation on that matter, but likewise supports the jihadists — and is importantly profiting from the organ-trade.)

4: Overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine in 2014 and replacing his democratic government by a barbaric fascist regime which perpetrated a massive ethnic-cleansing operation against its former Donbass region, which had voted 90% for that President. Then slapping economic sanctions against, and now even threatening invasion of, Russia, for Russia’s having protected Crimeans (who had voted 75% for that overthrown President) from their being similarly invaded, and from Obama’s intended take-over of Russia’s key naval base there at Sebastopol. (Oh, and did I mention, crashing Ukraine’s economy, and stripping it — but there’s too much misery in Ukraine now to even begin to itemize.)

5: Creating the refugee crisis in Europe, which doesn’t only produce hell for the millions of refugees from America’s coups and invasions, but which also weakens Europe — an American ‘ally,’ but an ‘ally’ which America’s Presidents don’t want to be able to overtake the U.S. so as to become the world’s top dog.

6: Now increasingly trying to do the same thing in Asia, especially to keep China down.

This is a far cry from the America of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who would be twisting in his grave to know what his successors have been doing after the anti-communist war was won in 1991. It’s become a shameful America, which is shameless. And the American people aren’t to blame for it; the American aristocracy, which rule here, are. The American people have been conquered, too. America’s aristocracy are as guilty as sin. They’re top dog, but this dog is rabid, and it now threatens the entire world. It’s not just George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and the Kochs, and George Soros, but it’s the whole hypocritical lot of them, the entire American aristocracy, the people who don’t merely run this lunatic asylum, they’re the schemers who’ve made it go mad and are trying to sic it against the rest of the world.

So, perhaps we’ll see what happens after July 8th and 9th. Will they call off their war? Or — as expected — escalate it to the next level?

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • There have been conversations. December 2nd, 2015 NATO Discussing Ways to Provoke Russia Further

    On Tuesday and Wednesday, NATO foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels on the pretext of “work(ing) on further measures to assure Turkey’s security,” and related issues, based on a nonexistent Russian threat

    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2015/12/02/nato-discussing-ways-to-provoke-russia-f#more41089

  • Aug 19, 2015 VICE News Meets NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg

    In the wake of events in Ukraine, NATO has turned its attention towards countries that border the Russian Federation — attempting to boost its quick-response capabilities in Europe. In September, the alliance agreed to create a 5,000-strong rapid reaction Spearhead Force, which will be capable of deploying across the continent within 48-hours of a military incursion. VICE News joined several thousand NATO troops in western Poland, for the first deployment test of the “Very High Readiness Joint Task Force.”

    https://youtu.be/QK5rHsoWaxY

  • Dec 3, 2015 U.S. and Western Policy Towards Russia by Center for Strategic by International Studies

    The Russian annexation of Crimea has led to over two years of debate regarding Washington’s strategy towards Moscow. Today, with Ukraine somewhat quieter and seeming progress towards cooperation on Syria, are more cooperative approaches possible? What should be Washington’s goals in engaging with Russia, or responding to it on the global stage? Are there tools that have not yet been tried, and what can they attain where other efforts have failed?

    https://youtu.be/4X45jEXej20

  • Mr Boompi

    There is no more traditional international law, if indeed it ever existed in the first place. This is a quaint concept that is only brought up if someone we oppose violates it. The people who run the US government, NATO, etc. do not abide by international or domestic laws. The whole concept of a One World Government and its installation must be ushered in by illegal means because no sane regular citizen would agree with it, anywhere. This is not a secret nor should it catch anyone by surprise.

  • Just Watching

    Russia has no red line. Obama can do anything he wants as long as he’s sneaky and does it piecemeal. Obama took a really big bite when the seized Ukraine in an uncontested coup. Russia still a laughing stock in many Washington circles.
    *
    Obama only understands the “hard stop”

    • tom

      On the contrary, Russia does have red lines. And if Mr Obama goes on the way he has been going, he is liable to run into an extra-hard “hard stop”. But he won’t get any warning, because the Russians don’t make threats. They just act when they need to.

      One other thing Mr Obama might remember: the Russians don’t start wars. They finish them. If he doesn’t quite grasp this, I suggest he spends an hour or two looking through some pictures of Berlin in May 1945. If he keeps on the way he has been, the USA may wind up looking very similar.

      • bosunj

        One can only hope.

      • cettel

        But then so would Russia. The question will be whether Obama considers that to be worth destroying his own country and most of the world.

    • Nexusfast123

      Typical arrogant American. Your comment makes you come across as an idiot. Read the Russian military doctrine. It is profoundly defensive but if Russia is attacked they will respond massively. So the NATO idiots can wave their limp dicks as much as they like.

  • May 18, 2016 Americans Send The World A Plea For Help

    As The United States Descends Into A Gestapo Police/Warfare State, Americans Send The World A Plea For Help: Rescue Us From Our Criminal Government By Ceasing To Aid And Abet Washington’s Crimes

    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/05/18/americans-send-the-world-a-plea-for-help/

  • tom

    “As if that weren’t bad enough, there’s the matter reported by Bryan Cloughly at Strategic Culture…”

    It’s “Brian Cloughley”. Apart from the fact that it’s common courtesy to spell people’s names correctly, how can we trust the facts and figures we read here if such a simple thing as a name contains two separate errors?

    • unheilig

      Considering that Eric Zuesse writes for Strategic Culture, these are very careless errors, agreed.

  • Nexusfast123

    Does any one have an idea what these NATO idiots hope to achieve as they seem to be making it up as they go along. Hitler had 4m men and got his armies smashed. NATO has only one military of significance which is the US. The rest are irrelevant.

  • unheilig

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, May 19 2016:

    “Putin doesn’t understand the power of Washington’s money. In the entire West only money counts. There is no such thing as Washington’s word, government integrity, truth, or even empirical facts. There are only well-propagated lies. The entire West is a lie. The West exists for one reason only–corporate profits.”

    • Baby_Jesus

      Capitalism: profits above the needs of the people.

  • Mar 23, 2016 Who is Advising Trump on Foreign Policy?

    During his tenure, former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger oversaw several bloody coups and wars while earning the reputation of a war criminal. Republican presumptive presidential candidate Donald Trump met with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger Wednesday, the GOP’s preeminent elder statesman and a controversial figure who orchestrated bloody coups and wars. The meeting was believed to be the real estate billionaire’s attempt to develop his presently unclear foreign policy.

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44696.htm

  • Septembre 2013, I wrote a commentary in my blog title: ” United States Of America and Russia In Bible Prophecy – Russia has a prophetic destiny – USA has none” It is a biblical perspective of where is America in prophecy… I invite you to read it to view event in the world in a very different perspective. Napoleon Bonaparte invaded Russia and failed. Adolph Hitler invaded Russia and failed. USA and Nato will fail. This commentary explain why? http://www.simplicityinthegospel.com/2013/09/united-states-of-america-and-russia-in.html

  • Isaac

    Any one who opposes the Zionist imperialists are the target of aggression by Israel-US Judaic Criminal Mafia. These hyenas are mad at Putin for stopping the Zionist dream of Greater Israel by liberating Syria from the world destroyers. The Russians might have a surprise under the sleeve, a big surprise that the zio-boys are not going to like.