White House Makes a Big Deal of New Heroin Efforts — But Says Nothing about Stemming the Flow or Why We’re Still at War in Narco-State Afghanistan

By Meryl Nass, M.D.  Dr. Nass is  a board-certified internist and a biological warfare epidemiologist and expert in anthrax. Nass publishes Anthrax Vaccine.

On March 29, 2016 the White House issued a press release on its new heroin initiative.  The Washington Post described how much Obama proposed to do.  The long list of fixes and new public-private partnerships concern treatment almost exclusively, with a small amount for increased policing.  The 1 billion dollars, Obama said, will treat “tens of thousands” of addicts.

Additional treatment is desperately needed, but the money won’t go far.  The White House and RAND said in 2014 that the US had 800,000–2.4 million heroin addicts. Treatment requires many months or years, and costs tens of thousands of dollars per person. The new funding will support less than 10% of those needing treatment.

Speaking at the National Prescription Drug Abuse and Heroin Summit in Atlanta, Obama … called addiction a “heartbreaking” issue that’s costing lives and devastating communities across the country. But he said: “I’m very optimistic that we can solve it.” Yeah right.  Till you get it off the street, bro, you ain’t done shit.

And can you be as glib, Mr. President, at explaining why you completely left out efforts to reduce the heroin supply?

From Wired, we learn that Obama ended (yes, ended) Afghan opium eradication soon after taking office:

In 2009, in one of his first major war policy decisions since becoming president, Barack Obama oversaw an end to U.S. poppy eradication… Without American support, Afghan government counternarcotic operations withered to a merely symbolic scale. Kabul’s agents would raze one acre of a 10-acre plot and call it “eradicated.” And that’s when the US heroin epidemic really took off, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse:

National Overdose Deaths—Number of Deaths from Heroin.
Aerial poppy eradication is off the table, according to the State Department, and the US no longer supports Afghan national counter-narcotics efforts. Hello?

Mr. President:  Please explain how and why you pulled the wool over the eyes of the American people by claiming the Taliban are in charge of Afghan opium?  Why didn’t you tell the truth: that they tax the acreage used to grow the crop?  (As do anti-Taliban militias in areas they control.) This is akin to property taxes.

Somebody else actually buys the opium, converts it to heroin, and brings it to the US, where it sells for over 1,000 times what the Taliban received in taxes.

Who, Mr. President, collects the big money?  Who buys the opium harvest, protects the movement of opium, its conversion to heroin, and ships it over here, undetected? Last I heard, the US installed much of the Afghan government and patrolled a lot of poppy fields.  Afghanistan is where between 75% and 93% of the world’s illicit opium is grown each year, on 500,000 (undisturbed) acres.

Funny how after spending 100 billion dollars on Afghan reconstruction, over $8 billion on opium eradication, and several trillion dollars on our 15 year Afghan war, the acreage under poppies has only expanded.  Funny about that.

Funny, too, is that big question mark… why are we still in Afghanistan?  I thought we went to get Bin Laden.  Well, he’s history.

Can someone explain our military objective for Afghanistan?  How do we justify this longest war in the 240 year history of our nation?

Writing about the Afghanistan war in National Defense magazine in 2009, Lawrence P. Farrell noted,

“Seldom do we hear or read a discussion of what the “political objective” should be or even whether anyone has articulated the political aims for the use of military force in that country.”

In 2010 General Petraeus was interviewed for the Council on Foreign Relations about this. He claimed,

our military’s operational objective [was] nation-building, euphemistically called counterinsurgency…”

Nation-building?  Back during the Vietnam war, we used a different expression to say the same thing:  “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”  During the Vietnam war, most US heroin came from poppies grown in Southeast Asia.

Some of this heroin arrived in the US on military planes, inside the body bags of fallen soldiers. It was loaded onto planes at US military bases in Vietnam, and unloaded at military bases in the US. Somebody in the government knew what was going on.

At fourteen years into the Afghan war, in October 2015, USAT reported,
“The president said he does not believe in “endless war,” but there remains an opportunity to forge a stable country that can prevent the emergence of future threats, an effort in which more than 2,200 Americans have given their lives.” Let’s face it.  The expressed reasons for our continuing adventure in Afghanistan are smoke and mirrors, nothing more.

Vietnam was another war in which the number of US soldiers who had lost their lives was oft-repeated as a justification to keep the war going. Vietnam was another war with fuzzy objectives, supposedly fought for a discredited “Domino Theory.” But perhaps there are good reasons why the lessons of Vietnam seem to have been ignored.

Few people know that Afghanistan hides immense underground wealth. But first it must be wrested from the Afghans. Heroin aside, two financial blockbusters are just waiting to be tapped.

1.  The value of Afghanistan’s mineral wealth was estimated at one trillion dollars by NPR, and at 1-3 trillion dollars by Bloomberg.  This almost certainly played a part in Russia’s decade-long, failed invasion of Afghanistan through the 1980s.
“Afghanistan, with certainty I can say, in 20 years is going to be a mining country,” Paul Brinkley, head of a Pentagon group called the Task Force for Business Stability Operations, tells NPR’s Rachel Martin. “That is going to happen.”

And from LiveScience in 2014:

Over the past four years, the US Geological Survey and  Department of Defense’s Task Force for Business and Stability Operations have embarked on dozens of excursions in the war zone to collect and analyze mineral samples… The researchers’ work has helped develop what are essentially treasure maps that let mining companies know what minerals are there, how much is there, and where they are, all to attract bids on the rights to the deposits…

2.   Pipeline construction, which has been on the table for the last 20 years, would move oil and gas from the Caspian basin to the Arabian Sea.  The region’s proven gas and oil reserves are huge, and equal to those in the US.  To finally reach the ocean, an oil or gas pipeline must cross through Afghanistan, or else through Iran.

From The Diplomat comes a telling quote:

“It is, therefore, little surprise that some experts contend that the country is not transitioning from “war to peace,” but rather from “military conflict to resource conflict.’”  Here’s the thing.  Obama needs to “forge a stable country” to prevent pipelines from being tapped or blown up, and protect future mining operations.

3.  Don’t forget that Afghanistan’s half million acres of poppy fields generate heroin worth roughly $200 billion dollars on the street, year after year. Unlike minerals and gas, this is a truly renewable resource.

Is the Afghan war–the longest American war–just about opium, minerals and pipelines? I could be missing some of the picture. Maybe I have oversimplified things. But phenomenal resources, still untapped, have to count as the lurking, almost-never-discussed elephant in the Afghan war room.

If the US government had reasonable political and military objectives, wouldn’t the government have provided a coherent account of its objectives by now?  In the absence of any meaningful explanation for this war, the only reason we remain there, with no prospect of getting out, is to secure control of Afghanistan’s resources for the US.  Or, more correctly, for the oligarchs who control US policy and who will reap the benefits–while the people of the US (and Afghanistan, much more so) pay the costs.

FACT:  the land under poppy cultivation has tripled since the US entered Afghanistan in 2001, helped by US spending for wells, roads and “reconstruction.”

FACT:  Ground was broken for Afghanistan’s first gas pipeline in December 2015.

Connect the dots.  As the pipeline project grows, so will our military commitment.

But there is one little bright spot.  It is a Presidential election year, and the candidates do have to answer questions.  I’m going to try and put their feet to the fire.  Will you do the same?

Ask the Presidential candidates to explain what we are doing in Afghanistan.

Who owns Afghan mineral rights?  Who is invested in Afghan pipelines?

Will the next President change course, and get seriously behind drug interdiction and eradication in Afghanistan?  How will the US government act to get Afghan (and all) heroin off our streets? How many soldiers must continue to die to protect the right to loot Afghanistan?

The huge tide of addiction blows right back from our rapacious Afghan policy. Over 10,000 Americans were lost to heroin in 2014. Deaths continue to climb.  In my state, Maine, deaths from heroin surpassed deaths from prescription drugs for the first time in 2015.

Even children of the rich and powerful are being fed to the demon heroin. Will the costs of our Afghan policy ever be too high for our policymakers to bear?

————–

The 2 earlier pieces I wrote regarding the heroin epidemic are here and here and they add to these ideas and documentation.  My mentors in this effort are Peter Dale Scott, Alfred McCoy, Michel Chossudovsky and Sibel Edmonds. Thanks also to William Edstrom for reminding me we can fight back.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • MrLiberty

    The “Air America” program was the CIA’s mechanism for raising HUGE sums of money controlling the global heroin trade out of SE Asia during the Vietnam war. The CIA now controls the Afghan poppy fields, has US military and/or private taxpayer-paid mercenaries to protect them, and they now run the global heroin trade from US bases in Afghanistan. The key players never change – only the venue changes. Back during the 80s, then vice-president Bush (former director of the CIA) was then in charge of funneling tons of cocaine into the US for the CIA that fueled the crack epidemic in the inner cities all to raise money to fund the Nicaraguan Contra rebels and to purchase guns for them through Iran. The war on drugs is about insuring HUGE profits for the US government black-ops division (aka the CIA) and the various wars around the world are all about securing natural resources for US big business interests, raw drug materials for the CIA’s global drug trade, and massive debt-spending to fuel the global bankster cartel. The sooner everyone wakes up to this reality, the sooner we can start discussing the dismantling of government as the ONLY solution to the problem.

    • unheilig

      Excellently well put. The espionage-MIC tail wags the US executive-branch dog, just as the Israeli tail wags the US dog. Huge profits for the 0.01% while the poor bastards of the 99.99% get blown up, driven out, addicted, impoverished or enslaved.

  • kimyo

    if they truly wanted to win the war on drugs, it would take all of ten minutes (only just slightly exaggerating). give a small team of geeks access to the cell phone records of a few hundred convicted dealers. they will find consistent patterns, possibly 1) large numbers of repeat calls of short duration or 2) a larger variance in the time of day or 3) bunches of call around a certain time of day.

    have them write a script to find these patterns in current phone records and we can wrap the whole deal up by december or so. usage pattern matches will lead to the street level dealers, scan their call histories for common numbers. those will be your second level dealers.

    the information is at our fingertips, the nsa has the necessary content/tools on file. those in power clearly have absolutely no desire to win this war. as with the wars on terror/poverty/gun violence/carbon it’s much more profitable to be waging the war than to have won it.

    • MrLiberty

      You either own your own body and can put into it whatever you wish or you are owned by the government – ie. a slave. Prohibition is a tool of enslavement and control and a mechanism for those who pass the laws to profit from the increased prices the laws will bring. It is about one group of people telling another group of people that they have NO RIGHTS to self-ownership. Why do in any way support the belief that people should not have a right to self-ownership? There are ONLY two sides to this argument. The side of freedom and liberty, and the side of tyranny. Which side are you going to be on?

      • Macon Richardson

        Thank you, Mr. Liberty. To further your point, free people don’t even need narcotic drugs, only slaves do. Slaves of the financial and entertainment industry need cocaine because it makes weak people feel strong. Slaves of the economy need heroin because heroin makes strong people feel weak. Why do they want to feel weak? Because in our (lack of) civilization, everyone is so atomized they cannot imagine that 99% working together can always triumph over an effete 1%.

        • MrLiberty

          What it comes down to is the free choice of free people combined with the requirement that they take personal responsibility for their actions, etc. People have been recreationally using drugs (and religiously) for tens of thousands of years and it is about choice. Yes, and some are slaves to their habits, but again it is about personal responsibility and accountability. Get the other folks out of the picture and let personal choice and responsibility play out as they will.

          • Macon Richardson

            Indeed, sir! Perhaps we can define freedom as taking personal responsibility for one’s actions.

          • MrLiberty

            I really don’t see any other way to define freedom. For if you are forcing others to take responsibility for YOUR actions, then you are violating their rights and that is NOT freedom. We have gone so long in this country without personal freedom, or any complete sense of personal responsibility, that most people simply forget about personal responsibility in the discussion and therefore think freedom for some is naturally going to be miserable for them (because they are always forced by government to “pick up the check.”

          • Macon Richardson

            We are in accord.

      • FYI – MARCH 23, 2016 Former Nixon Aide Admits War On Drugs Was A Big Lie; Was Never About Drugs

        To clarify, it was not Nixon’s police state that was a lie. That was very real. It was the justification used for the war, the fearmongering, and the panic-inducing hype produced by the White House that was a monumental obfuscation.

        http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/03/former-nixon-aide-admits-war-on-drugs-was-a-big-lie-was-never-about-drugs.html

      • Jul 19, 2012 What Happened When Portugal Decriminalized *ALL* Drugs?

        “The government in Portugal has no plans to back down. Although the Netherlands is the European country most associated with liberal drug laws, it has already been ten years since Portugal became the first European nation to take the brave step of decriminalizing possession of all drugs within its borders—from marijuana to heroin, and everything in between.

        https://youtu.be/unu-sbtp65A

        7/05/2011 Ten Years After Decriminalization, Drug Abuse Down by Half in Portugal

        http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/07/05/ten-years-after-decriminalization-drug-abuse-down-by-half-in-portugal/

        Jul. 17, 2012 Portugal Decriminalized All Drugs Eleven Years Ago And The Results Are Staggering

        http://www.businessinsider.com/portugal-drug-policy-decriminalization-works-2012-7

  • Paranoid Factoid

    I’ve written of this here on Wahington’s Blog before, but I’d like to mention it again. I think the drug war should be viewed through the lens of the old trading Slave Triangle from the 17th through the 19th century. It’s a modern re-implementation.

    To refresh, in the 17t century, a trading triangle developed between Great Britain, the US Colonies (and later United States), and Africa. In this, England bought raw cotton from the Americas for silver. The silver bought slaves in Africa and transported them to the Colonies. And the Slaves worked plantation fields in the Colonies to produce cotton.

    Today, this system has been re-implemented as a drug trade. In Afghanistan, opium is produces. It’s illegally imported into the United States by intelligence agencies. The drug war drives up prices for illicit drugs. They use the money to buy weapons to fund illicit military operations throughout the world ( coups det tat). While the drug war creates a domestic underclass of felons (conveniently opponents of the dominant power structure) who – stripped of their franchise and put in prison for long terms – become abject slaves to a class of corporate feudal lords. In prison, they are real slaves – tied to commercial interests via prison contracts to domestic producers. As felons, they are stripped of voting rights and revoked access to high paying jobs.

    It’s a modern day slave trade triangle. Right before our eyes.

  • Jan 9, 2015 Opium Production in Afghanistan Sets Record – American Soldiers Helping Heroin Sales

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIkLYlaZ6kY

    June 10, 2014 Drug War? American Troops Are Protecting Afghan Opium. U.S. Occupation Leads to All-Time High Heroin Production

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/drug-war-american-troops-are-protecting-afghan-opium-u-s-occupation-leads-to-all-time-high-heroin-production/5358053

    http://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/opium-fields10-1024×682.jpg

  • December 3, 1993 The CIA Drug ConnectionIs as Old as the Agency

    http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/03/opinion/03iht-edlarry.html

    Mar 29, 2010 US Soldiers guarding opium in Afghanistan

    https://youtu.be/ChIF6yvTL6k

  • 26.03.2016 President Trump? US War Machine Rolls On

    There’s little doubt that, as president, Hillary Clinton will enact the same sorts of disastrous and criminal policies that her predecessors of both parties have pursued. Donald Trump, on the other hand, is being lauded by many as a much needed change in terms of US foreign policy, someone whose ideas and actions will be guided by a very different understanding of the world.

    http://journal-neo.org/2016/03/26/president-trump-us-war-machine-rolls-on/