Reuters Poll Shows 51% of Americans Think Primary Process is “Rigged” – Here’s Why It Matters

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Screen Shot 2016-04-19 at 10.41.08 AM

Reuters/Ipsos recently conducted a poll in which it asked Americans whether the primary process for choosing presidential candidates was rigged. Here’s what they found:

More than half of American voters believe that the system U.S. political parties use to pick their candidates for the White House is “rigged” and more than two-thirds want to see the process changed, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll.

The results echo complaints from Republican front-runner Donald Trump and Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders that the system is stacked against them in favor of candidates with close ties to their parties – a critique that has triggered a nationwide debate over whether the process is fair.

Trump has repeatedly railed against the rules, at times calling them undemocratic. After the Colorado Republican Party awarded all its delegates to Ted Cruz, for example, Trump lashed out in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece, charging “the system is being rigged by party operatives with ‘double-agent’ delegates who reject the decision of voters.”

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus has dismissed Trump’s complaints as “rhetoric” and said the rules would not be changed before the Republican convention in July.

Some 51 percent of likely voters who responded to the April 21-26 online survey said they believed the primary system was “rigged” against some candidates. Some 71 percent of respondents said they would prefer to pick their party’s nominee with a direct vote, cutting out the use of delegates as intermediaries.

The results also showed 27 percent of likely voters did not understand how the primary process works and 44 percent did not understand why delegates were involved in the first place. The responses were about the same for Republicans and Democrats.

Many people will read this and say, so what? Everyone knows it’s rigged? To that I would say, not quite.

While anyone paying close attention will have come to terms with the fact that everything in America is rigged to favor a handful of oligarchs, most people have been either blissfully unaware, or in denial, of this reality for most of their lives. The painful admission by 51% of Americans polled that the process for choosing the U.S. President is a rigged sham, is an indispensable first step toward correcting the problem. As James Baldwin so accurately noted:

Screen Shot 2016-04-27 at 9.08.53 AM

So the first observation is that the American public is finally starting to wake up. The second observation is that this is very good news for Trump.

If Trump were running against Sanders in the general, he’d be in huge trouble. Fortunately for him, he’ll get to compete against one of most corrupt, dishonest political creatures the world has ever seen. This allows him to continue to play the outsider role against a consummate crony insider.

Moreover, he’s the candidate who can honestly say primary rigging has worked to undermine, while everyone knows Hillary is the candidate the rigging worked to benefit. Trump will win the nomination despite the establishment doing everything thy could to stop him. In an environment in which 43% of Americans identify as independents, and 51% see the whole process as rigged, who do you think this benefits?

Trump couldn’t have asked for a better setup. All he has to do now is close.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • diogenes

    It just goes to show if a system sh*ts on people every four years in the same way, after seven or eight decades a few of them start to catch on. Nothing like public education and media to keep people slow.

  • ClubToTheHead

    The parties write and enforce the rules of ballot access.

    Self dealing unaccountability leads to self advantage.

    Any mystery here?

    American’s minds have been conquered. They believe the facts are what they must be, not as articulated by assholes.

  • MrLiberty

    Every political party should have the right to decide for themselves how they select their candidates…..BUT….the two major parties enjoy absolute control of our national political process, taxpayers shell out millions of dollars not just to pay for these rigged primaries, but also the national conventions, ballot access laws in EVERY state keep competitors out of the running, Gerrymandered districts in EVERY state protect entrenched incumbents at the expense of all citizens, and Congressional rules, the Electoral College, and countless other “structures” insure that two party dominance is maintained regardless of citizen outrage.

    It begins by allowing one set of individuals to possess rights over others that NONE OF US possess individually. It continues because WE ALLOW IT. It will end when we no longer accept the fallacy that government is needed to have an orderly, safe, prosperous, or enjoyable society.

  • yEshUA ImmAnUEl

    “No one religion is either better or more Divine than the other, except in the degree that it teaches purity of life, devotion to duty, faith in humanity, love for one’s fellow man, helpfulness to one another and commands man to search for his own Soul WITHIN HIMSELF.
    Religion, regardless of name or sect, must teach man the spiritual meaning of purity of life, and through his OWN efforts, he must succeed in bringing forth the Soul ,hidden, deeply buried by his carnal nature, within himself.
    The Goal of man is to achieve perfection by developing purity and uprightness in his daily life. Man’s WORK is to find and bring into manifestation the Soul; the God asleep within; this is the crucifixion of the carnal through its sacrifice upon the altar of purification or elevation.”

  • yEshUA ImmAnUEl

    “The true seekers are not so easily satisfied. They seek spiritual development, and continue to seek, until they attain Cosmic knowledge of the Soul’s divinity.
    One must possess the desire for, or the willingness to undergo, the self-denial necessary for such attainment.”

    • unheilig

      Pink.

Navigation