Obama: We Can’t Let Truth Come Out About Saudi Involvement In 9/11, Or Else America’s Terrorism Will Be Revealed

Obama told CBS News today that we can’t allow bipartisan legislation subjecting the Saudis to potential liability for terrorism … or else other countries could retaliate against the US (starting at 0:40):

Similarly, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said today:

“The whole notion of sovereign immunity is at stake,” Earnest told reporters Monday. “It could put the United States, and our taxpayers, and our service members and our diplomats at significant risk, if other countries were to adopt a similar law.”

As Cal Thomas points out at the Washington Times:

The intent of the Senate bill is to clarify the immunity normally given to foreign governments. It says such immunity should not apply when nations are found culpable of committing terrorist attacks that kill Americans on U.S. soil.

Why would the U.S. be worried about retaliation by other countries … being held accountable for terrorism?

Well, the director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

And – while Saudi Arabia is certainly a huge sponsor of terrorism worldwide – experts from the right and the left agree that the U.S. is actually the world’s largest sponsor of terrorism. And see this.

Postscript:  Of course, it would be nice if everyone – including both the Saudis and Americans – moved past this and stopped committing terror.

But it doesn’t seem like either country is willing to commit to that …

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • WB has had numerous articles lately about 9/11 and the lamestream media attention to the “Saudi connection” limited hangout is in reaction to 9/11 truth. Obama said he has a “sense” of what the 28 pages say but its up to Clapper, the man who lied to Congress under oath, to decide what to do about the contents…. so Clapper has security clearances that Obama does not? Observe the photo they put up in this clip. Its the outer lobby cladding of either WTC 1 or 2. I was there in the lobby before 9/11. Note that its the only part of the structure left standing eventhough the more robust interior support columns are gone. The lobby was 3 stories high inside. It was the only part of the structure that was visible from 360 degrees around and that is why it is the only part left intact. Now, how can there be high jackers when in fact no planes were high jacked? A hundred proofs are available showing that this legend is mythological, not factual. There is nothing that any Saudi could have done to make 9/11 happen without intimate cooperation from the highest levels of the US military and intelligence services. This is easy to prove mathematically in terms of probabilities. As for bin Laden, his FBI Most Wanted sheet didnt even mention 9/11 because according to the FBI there was insufficient evidence to even get an indictment. This alone makes moot the whole ridiculous 19 highjacker conspiracy theory underway now because without bin Laden in the picture they are like spokes without a hub.

    • Sarastro92

      “There is nothing that any Saudi could have done to make 9/11 happen
      without intimate cooperation from the highest levels of the US military
      and intelligence services.”

      Absolutely correct. The 9/11 terror spectacle was a co-production of US Military and Intelligence working with the Saudis. The latter funded the operation and provided the al Q stooges who played their role in creating the 9/11 narrative to create a New Pearl Harbor.

      The rest is history. 9/11 made all sorts of horrible initiatives politically palatable: A Perpetual War of Terror and non-stop global regime change; creation of an Orwellian police state; shredding the last vestiges of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution in general.

      • Simplon

        Either ordinary Americans still today are extremely stupid to still embracing the belief of the19 hijackers bullshit or the author of this piece of crap pretends to perpetuate that nonsense.

        Let’s try to figure out how the Saudis were able to demolish Building 7 (World Trade Center 7 also known as the Salomon Brothers’ Building) without using a plane.

        https://youtu.be/bWorDrTC0Qg

        • Sarastro92

          No. Let’s prosecute those who engineered the 9/11 Terror Spectacle whose names are already well known.

          • jae

            I agree, the best way we can help the US is to bring to the Hague all the people who testified and have this sorted out once and for all b/c this is complete BS that we know we’ve been lied to and for ONCE the gov owes the people the truth. I think they can’t tell it b/c if they did, there’d be some…..dissolution of government or I don’t know. I haven’t trusted anything from gov since 911 b/c I knew it to be a lie. People should have protested more about Iraq. We tried, the gov didn’t listen as always and now US citizens seemed to be attacked or go missing all the time now when out of the country.

          • Sarastro92

            Yeah… well the 9/11 spectacle is one of he reasons the US wants to stay out of the Hague.

            Most of what’s in the 28 pages has already come out via Sen Graham and the national archive project… the Saudi role is pretty clear. Some will want to “blame the Saudis” … 9/11 was co-produced by them and the US military and intelligence (CIA- FBI)

        • sisterlauren

          Hint: it was loaded with CIA documents.

          • jae

            I think there were some Navy offices in there too, the financials. Remember the day before, 2 trillion went missing from the Navy, and those offices were the ones destroyed at the Pentagon. The whole thing stinks of another Pearl Harbor only worse!

  • Dow Jones

    Built into the narrative of Mossad CIA lies from the start the 28 page red
    herring about the camel herders who stiffed USSA …now the crime can get a new
    lease of life, Saudi wealth can be confiscated, the camel patch of Saud invaded
    and its oil stolen for USSA and Israhell. What could be more convenient?

    Kevin Ryan had it right from the beginning “The get into Saudi Arabia
    free card” to be played when USSA and the tribe decide the jig is up and
    it needs to be shunted to the next level.

    Even the perfumed prince Wesley Clarke was laying the groundwork in 2007
    with his “7 countries in 5 years” meme which curiously included
    USSA’S second best buddy, the fecal filled feudal crypt of Saud. No better way
    to loot the Saudi “Treasury” stack of triple ply blood smeared toilet
    paper and gold than to pull a Qaddafi on them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0fAbpoCCWY

    perfidy, thy name be Anglozionazi Empire of Carnage.

    • I chuckled at your satirical language but on a serious note that is a very interesting possibility…that they would blame Saudi then declare null and void, all the US debt they own…I hadnt considered that. I had thought about that happening to China. They will provoke an incident in the South China Sea then if China hits back they will use sanctions to declare a moratorium on their one trillion dollar US treasury holdings….that will “pay for the war” just like Iraqi oil was supposed to pay for that war: @Kick their ass then steal their gas@ was the bumper sticker in 2003

      • sisterlauren

        It seems to be a well used strategy.

  • Bill Shevick

    Israel thinks throwing the Saudis under the bus will build a firewall. They are wrong. Every day more and more Americans are learning who actually did 9/11.

    • ……..

      I suppose you mean Bush?

      • jae

        No, he’s a fool and was in the dark that day, imo. He’s to dumb to pull anything like that off, but I believe he knew after the fact things that he lied about.

    • Nowpower

      Exactly

  • sisterlauren

    Actually other countries could still sue our leaders for their involvement in war crimes in the International Criminal Court.

    • jae

      No they can’t, The US is not a part of the ICC. We can’t be b/c we have to be the scapegoat for all our allies too. I WISH we could bring the whole Bush admin and everyone having anything to do with 911 and invasion of Iraq there!!

  • MahmudH

    It would be good to get the truth out there and have some honesty about the alliance between the wahabis and the west.

    • jae

      It’s only an alliance based off our need for oil. If they didn’t have it, we wouldn’t be there and they would have nothing.. I WISH the US never got involved with KSA. I want the US to have NOTHING to do with countries that treat women how they treat women and so many of their crazy beliefs. In my view, religion is evil. It’s shameful and embarrassing for the US to associate with people like that. Truthfully, I don’t see their acts of beheading people any worse than US cops gunning people down in the street. At least before the beheading of those people, they likely had some sort of trial, whereas here so many people don’t. I am in no way saying that I condone beheadings, it’s just, the US kills it’s citizens all the time.

      • Donato Lepore

        What is missing from this whole discussion is the evangelicals who are infatic about the necessity for Israel to exist least we forget that George W Bush was an evangelical and owed his presidency to thier vote…Sad am was the largest threat to a stable Isreal and needed to be taken out

  • nomadfiles

    Weren’t there Israeli art students living in one of the twin towers amidst enormous amounts boxes of explosives?
    ()

    • Nowpower

      That’s been debunked, although 200 Israelis were arrested most of whom had military experience including explosive ordinance, etc.

      • nomadfiles

        thanks