False flag nuclear attack on Chicago? Predictive programming and 3,000 millionaires fleeing demand attention; .01% crimes in war and money demand arrests BEFORE more false flags

Would the US government unleash a nuclear false flag attack upon an American city? Consider these three data points for your answer:

Consider this 2-minute video of post-apocalyptic Chicago from the Divergent series:

For your answer: let’s consider Earth’s ongoing tragic-comedy history: a world dominated by quest for empire. How .01% “leaders” roll with Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes:

These crimes annually cost millions killed, billions harmed, and trillions looted, with recent history continuing literal centuries of US lie-began Wars of Aggression that involved your families in two horrific global wars.

Additional data before you answer:

But wait:

Do we really want to wait to discover this answer, or demand arrests of .01% US “leaders” now for obvious crimes centering in war and money?

The categories of crime include:

  1. Wars of Aggression (the worst crime a nation can commit).
  2. Likely treason for lying to US military, ordering unlawful attack and invasions of foreign lands, and causing thousands of US military deaths.
  3. Crimes Against Humanity for ongoing intentional policy of poverty that’s killed over 400 million human beings just since 1995 (~75% children; more deaths than from all wars in Earth’s recorded history).

Such crimes OBVIOUSLY call for legal arrests of “leaders” in government, and in corporate media for “covering” those crimes (4-part series on arrests with videos).

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states the “very obvious solutions” to US/UK/Israel unlawful Wars of Aggression: arrest the obvious criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

If you’d like to consider historical false flags in this period, along with how this might intersect with secret societies, here and here might be helpful.

Your answer to the question of “False Flag nuclear weapon possible?” Whatever you conclude is most rational, of course, is your best answer. That said, those of us who take answering seriously are likely to start with something like:

“A large-scale False Flag Operation (would/would not) be a reasonable conclusion of strategy by US .01% oligarchs to further political purpose because (insert historical analysis).”

My answer: Yes, of course Earth and US history support the conclusion that our 1% oligarchy would use a convenient False Flag situation to further their political agenda of empire. As I stated, we live in a nation of recent history of false flag attacks for empire that continue literal centuries of US lie-began Wars of Aggression that involved nearly all families in two horrific global wars for colonial empire.

I don’t know about your family, but I know mine:

Perhaps this famous quote makes better sense now:

“Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” – George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Vol. 1.


Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.


Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).


This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Tomas Estrada-Palma

    Impressive analysis of reality.

  • jadan

    Not going to happen. 911 established the war on terror and gutted the Bill of Rights. The National Security State now has no lack of political control. An act of nuclear terror would be the end of the world as we know it. Orwellian totalitarianism does not create sustainable political control, which can only happen when people believe themselves to be “free enough”.

    • Jose Padilla was a Chicago man of Puertorrican heritage. He converted to Islam in prison, then made ill advised trips to the middle east, robably at the instigation of informants. Upon his return to Chicago, he was arrested. The Bush regime used him as a guinea pig, sending him to a Navy brig for years without any trial. He he was held as an enemy combatant and denied all rights afforded to US citizens. At the time, this was revolutionary and established the legal precedent later built upon by Obama to kill US citizens with no due process. Most Americans didnt care because Padilla is Latino and an ex con who converted to Islam. Now, guess what Padilla was accused of: planning to detonate a nuclear weapon in Chicago. Yes, he was convicted of conspiring to set off a dirty bomb, i.e. a conventional weapon with radioactive material around it. Of course, it was an absurd case, he had no ability to do such a thing. Like 99% of all the other hapless victims entrapped in these stings, he was set up. But this proves that the intelligence services are actively thinking about such things and given what we have seen with dozens of managed events since OK city, it is inevitable that we will see an event involving nuclear material.

      • jadan

        They may fantasize about dirty bombs, which keeps the public on edge, particularly when they can sacrifice a hapless victim with that charge. They would not permit such a bomb to be used, nor would they deploy a nuclear bomb. The capacity for destruction is greater than we know. State terror has to have strict limits….

        • Carl_Herman

          Unless, bro, the .01% are desperate from too much attention to their crimes from alternative media.

          • jadan

            The day these people start behaving like cornered rats, that’s the day I’ll worry. That’s not the situation presently….

          • kimyo

            on 9/11, bush and cheney weren’t ‘behaving like cornered rats’ yet, norad stood down and here we are today.

            hitler wasn’t ‘behaving like a cornered rat’ when the reichstag burned. nor was fdr as the japanese bombed pearl harbor. your theory may require re-thinking.

          • Brockland A.T.

            Carl Herman makes an interesting point. Unfortunately. Consider Flint, Michigan. An entire city written off to lead contamination. They knew better. Were they worried cornered rats ever?


            If one wanted to test radiological cleanup technologies and procedures for a post-holocaust scenario, a dirty bomb might still leave most of a city habitable. Its also not impossible to accelerate radionuclide decay. Although, testing that at Fukushima seems far less wasteful. But then, the cat would be out of the bag and people might demand destruction of all nuclear materials including the bombs.


            The U.S. seems really attached to nukes, and has recently backed out of a deal with Russia to reprocess plutonium into a non-weaponized form.


            There’s also Agenda 21 to consider; if one wanted to evacuate a small city and return it to nature, why not claim its inhabitable due to a dirty bomb. Then maybe quietly remediate it and pretend its still radioactive so no-one goes back. Or just leave it.


            So, there are reasons favouring a nuclear own-goal. There are few places outside the Western world (including Japan) where this sort of mass population experimentation could be conducted and ‘fallout’ still tightly controlled.

            Its unlikely to come to fruition, but even the ‘correct’ use of a full nuke has advantages; as a high airburst munition, the radiological effects are muted while maximizing the blast effects, compared to a ground burst. Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not become nuclear wastelands because the bombs were used as airbust incindiaries. The groundbursts used in most early open-air tests left contaminated waste zones because they blasted land directly.


            Of course, arrests aren’t going to happen without the right people in office to follow through with public interest and demand them.

            Before its too late, get the government you want, today! Proportional representation, an idea whose time has come.


            There’s also another interesting alternative/transitional step; range voting. Sort of like Olympic sport scoring where the voter rates a candidate…


            As the security state begins winnowing out patriots at the upper echelons, Operation Northwoods-type scenarios can only become more plausible and extreme. President Kennedy rejected Northwoods in 1963 – but the Joint Chiefs of Staff approved Northwoods and continued to plan false flags until (officially at least) 1963.

            The rickety old democracy 17th c. tech of the U.S. government has got to be upgraded to something more accountable and effective.

          • jadan

            State terror is effective when it is not recognized as such. 911 was very successful because even Noam Chomsky said it was inconcievable that the government would do such a thing. The perps acted with impunity. They were not desperadoes seeking the salvation of their cause through an impulsive act of mass murder, shock, and awe. They used terror to achieve a political agenda: the incitement of the population to war and the sacrifice of their unalienable rights. They were not cornered rats then, nor do they feel threatened today. They, the architects and supporters of the national security state, are in control. For this reason they will not resort to dirty deeds such as radiological terror or nuclear bombs. This is too obviously state-sponsored. They are in control because the people consent to this control. It seems reasonable and prudent. 911 was a masterpiece of terror. They won. No need to undermine state credibility with more terror.

          • Brockland A.T.

            That’s wishful thinking on so many levels, most particularly thinking the stakeholders of the national security state are in any way sane and self-moderating.

            The fact that Russia can defend itself, for example, may blunt overt actions and force moderation, but incenses the desire to destroy Russia for the ‘crime’ of self-defense. We the People aren’t any different insofar as our consent to be so ruled is needed.

            State terror only needs the fig leaf of a false flag, which the article warns of. Then as Chomsky says, implausibility. A nuclear own-goal would be inconceivable and blamed on terrorism. No-one thinks about who the three white guys were at the San Bernando murder spree.


            The State’s individual stakeholders will always feel under threat; its a very competitive environment. Paranoia of their fellow class members easily translates into paranoia over the popular will to resist being bullied, and any act of lower-class resistance real or imagined is going to be perceived as deserving of punishment. The mere act of wanting democracy is an offense.


            The point of more terror is not to undermine state credibility, but the value of the popular will and its confidence in itself, the way an abuser in a relationship strives to break down the other. The state already has no credibility. Serial abusers in a relationship always default to more abuse, in this case terror.

            The act of conceding they’ve won, appeasement, is pointless. Any honeymoon period over getting away with something always ends in repeat abuse and escalation is inevitable. The psychology of abuse by individuals and by groups is increasingly well-studied.



      • Carl_Herman

        Oh, snap, that’s right! I wrote about Jose Padilla in detail, although those articles were “disappeared” by Examiner.com. I felt there was something about Chicago worth attention, especially with Rahm Emanuel as mayor.

        Jose was declared an “unlawful enemy combatant” under 2006 Military Commissions Act; an invented category to use dictatorial power to destroy all rights for anyone accused by government. The Chicago bomb part might be the key…

  • truthtime

    I remember the predicative programing from that one Lone Gunmen episode quite clearly. Just some food for thought.

    • nomadfiles

      Wow! That was deep. I never saw that before (Just googled it). 1997???
      “You and your friends are fighting for the American dream. Just don’t expect to win.”
      How prophetic. On 911, we lost. We lost that dream.

    • nomadfiles

      More 911 predictive programming. This one scheduled for the year and month 9/11 actually happened.
      The cover art was finished in June 2001 and the album was scheduled to be released in mid-September.[2] However, in response to the uncanny similarity of the artwork with the September 11, 2001, attacks, the album release was delayed until November of that year with the cover featuring a hand with a flaming martini glass.

      • nomadfiles

        eerie that the explosions in the picture mimic almost exactly the locations the planes struck. wonder who designed this album cover.
        “Hey, I want an image of the twin towers with explosions on the the 93-99 floors of one and 78-84 floors of the other. Send me a sketch.”

    • nomadfiles

      Condoleezza Rice told reporters:

      “I don’t think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile. All of this reporting about hijacking was about traditional hijacking.”

      – See more at: http://nomadicpolitics.blogspot.com/2012/04/nobody-could-have-predicted-it-bush.html#sthash.RpjBc4pU.dpuf

      I guess, like me, she never saw that episode. Bush neither. Nor Cheney.
      Humph. These people don’t watch enough television.

      • From the linked article:
        The 1993 book, Target America: Terrorism in the US Today, Yossef Bodansky gives explicit and detailed information about a similar covert operation by the Iranian regime, dating back to the 1980s. In the book, Target America, Bodansky throws a spotlight on a terrorist training program initiated by the Iranian Islamic Republic’s military in the early 1980s- the Pasadaran terrorist program.

        According to one Iranian pilot who has served as a flight instructor for the program until 1983, one method of attack involved the use of suicide bombers “in which pilots crashed Pilantus PC-7 aircraft loaded with explosives into major targets and died like martyrs.”

        The training of suicide pilots started in Busher Air Base in Iran in the early 1980s with some 80 Pilatus PC-7 aircraft purchased from Switzerland. But the Iranian Pasdaran pilots were inexperienced, and several fatally crashed during low-altitude flying before they could even reach their targets.

        The targets of the planes flown by the graduate suicide pilots was to be the palaces of heads of state of the Gulf states. ….

        Additional suicide pilots trained in North Korean were sent to Lebanon, where their intended targets were part of the US 6th Fleet.

        Eventually, this kamikaze program was expanded to include attacks on Western cities. And, if Bodansky’s information is correct, the training was thorough and complete. Apparently when it came to training and accuracy, the coordinators of the program spared no expense.

        “For the disruption of aerial traffic in the West, from airport attacks to hijacking, Iran maintained two major installations for terrorist training. The first installation was established in Wakilabad near Mashhad. The entire Western-built airport was given over to the terrorist training program.”

        Iran Air maintained a Boeing 707 and Boeing 727 in the airport and could send a Boeing 747 for special classes. There were several former Iran Air and Iranian air force pilots among the staff and students, including some who were trained in the United States.

        Keep in mind this information in Bodansky’s book was already available to the public by 1993 and presumably much earlier to the Western intelligence agencies. The book could be found in bookstores, in public libraries or ordered online. It was, therefore, hardly classified information.

        (The aircraft used in the 911 attacks were Boeing 767-223ER and Boeing 767-300ER.)

        Now on the following page Bodansky provides the clincher.

        “According to a former trainee in Wakilabad, one of the exercises included having an Islamic jihad detachment seize (or hijack) a transport aircraft. Then trained air crews from among the terrorists would crash the airliner with its passengers into a selected objective.”

  • Marie Wright

    500 pounds of explosives stolen from a CSX train in Chicago 4/22/16. Not yet found.

  • Greg Burton

    Yes, it does demand attention.