9/11 Commission Did Not Exonerate Saudis

By Kristen Breitweiser, one of the four 9/11 widows – known as the “Jersey Girls” – instrumental in forcing the government to form the 9/11 Commission to investigate the 2001 attacks. Follow Kristen Breitweiser on Twitter: .

Americans are not used to reading investigative pieces of journalism. We like to tweet and text in small bites. But here’s the thing. Sometimes, the most important things can’t be explained in 15 bites or less. Sometimes, it takes more space and time. And so I ask everyone who is reading this blog to please read it in its entirety — especially the bold parts. And, if you care about our country, if you care about peace, and keeping American lives safe from terrorists, pay attention to what is being said here — and never forget it.

The time has come to clarify some inaccuracies and misleading statements being made in the media regarding the 28 pages, the 9/11 attacks, the investigation of the 9/11 attacks, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). In doing so, perhaps the American public will come to understand the importance of passing JASTA (Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act) and releasing the 28 pages in their entirety.

The 9/11 Commission’s mandate was to not replicate, but rather to expand upon the investigation of the JICI. The JICI was the Joint Intelligence Committee’s Inquiry into the 9/11 attacks, headed by Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss. The JICI is where the 28 pages originated. Furthermore, the JICI made a finding of fact and final recommendation that further investigation into the role of KSA and the 9/11 attacks needed to be done, immediately. Therefore, the 9/11 Commission should have carried out this further investigation of the KSA and 9/11. But, they did not. It is only the 9/11 families and intrepid journalists who have continued to investigate the Saudi role for the past twelve years.

As reported and documented in The New York Time’s national security correspondent Philip Shenon’s book, “The Commission,” Staff Director of the 9/11 Commission, Phil Zelikow, actively worked against any thorough investigation into the KSA and its role in the 9/11 attacks.

So, when two JICI staffers were brought over to the 9/11 Commission to continue their work on the links between the KSA and the 9/11 attacks, they were blocked by Zelikow. Zelikow fired one investigator when she tried to access the 28 pages as part of her further investigation and work for the commission. And, the second staffer (who was the person responsible for writing the 28 pages in the first place when he worked on the JICI) was actively thwarted from his investigation by Zelikow, as well. In fact, once the 9/11 Commission report was in its final draft form, Zelikow “re-wrote” the entire section that dealt with the Saudis—leaving out vital, highly pertinent, and extremely damning information.

Thus, when a person says the 9/11 Commission, “found no evidence linking the Saudis,” be wary of the cute context of the words. The 9/11 commission “found no evidence” because they were either never allowed to look for any evidence or whatever evidence they did find was conveniently written out of the final report, compliments of Phil Zelikow.

Why would Zelikow block his own investigation? No one knows for sure, but for starters, Zelikow was taking regular phone calls from Karl Rove whose job at the time was to ramp up the drumbeat for the war in Iraq—not a war with Saudi Arabia.

In addition, Zelikow was part of the Bush transition team and good friends with Condoleeza Rice. In fact, it was Zelikow’s job to brief the incoming Bush Administration about national security issues. It’s safe to say that the “sleeper cells” living inside the U.S., and the other facets of the Saudi nexus of help for the 9/11 hijackers was not something Zelikow was eager to delve into while on the Bush transition team or as Staff Director of the 9/11 Commission.

Had the information regarding the Saudis and 9/11 been properly and fully investigated by the 9/11 Commission, and had that investigation continued thereafter, the facts surrounding the FBI and CIA and their collective failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks, would have certainly come to further light. Let’s not forget the Director of the FBI’s unacceptable “handling” and “covering up” of several Saudi accomplices before and after the 9/11 attacks by permitting them to leave the country, evade arrest, and prosecution.

Suffice it to say, both the JICI and the 9/11 Commission clearly document that prior to the 9/11 attacks, the KSA was not as helpful as it could be with regard to providing access to al Qaeda prisoners, stopping the flow of money to UBL, and/or sharing information with regard to UBL.

But most importantly, both the JICI and the 9/11 Commission provide plenty of statements, facts, and findings that show KSA aided, abetted and had roots and connections to the 9/11 hijackers. In short, there’s likely a very good reason that the name “Saudi Arabia” appears more often in both reports than names like Iran, Syria, and Iraq.

The JICI Finding #15 states, “Regarding Saudi Arabia, the Committee heard testimony from U.S. government personnel that Saudi officials had been uncooperative and often did not act on information implicating Saudi nationals. According to a U.S. government official, it was clear from about 1996 that the Saudi government would not cooperate with the United States on matters relating to Osama bin Laden…a number of U.S. government officials complained to the Joint Inquiry about a lack of Saudi cooperation in terrorism investigations both before and after the September 11th attacks.

The JICI Finding #20 states, “Through its investigation, the Joint Inquiry developed information suggesting specific sources of foreign support for some of the September 11 hijackers while they were in the U.S. The Joint Inquiry’s review confirmed that the Intelligence Community also has information, much of which has yet to be independently verified, concerning these potential sources of support. In their testimony, neither CIA nor FBI officials were able to address definitively the extent of such support for the hijackers globally or within the U.S. or the extent to which such support, if it exists, is knowing or inadvertent in nature…This gap in U.S. intelligence coverage is unacceptable, given the magnitude and immediacy of the potential risk to U.S. national security. The Intelligence Community needs to address this area of concern as aggressively and quickly as possible.

The JICI’s Final Recommendation # 19, “The Intelligence Community and particularly the FBI and the CIA should aggressively address the possibility that foreign governments are providing support to or are involved in terrorist activity targeting the U.S. and U.S. interests. State sponsored terrorism substantially increases the likelihood of successful and more lethal attacks within the U.S. This issue must be addressed from a national standpoint and should not be limited in focus by the geographical and factual boundaries of individual cases. The FBI and CIA should aggressively and thoroughly pursue related matters developed through this Joint Inquiry that have been referred to them for further investigation by these Committees.

Commission Staff Statement #5, “Diplomacy” states, “the Saudis were reluctant or unable to provide much help.“ The Staff Statement concludes, “before 9/11 the Saudi and U.S. governments did not achieve full sharing of important intelligence information or develop an adequate joint effort to track and disrupt the finances of the al Qaeda organization.”

Commission Staff Statement #8, “National Policy Coordination” states, “in June 1999, National Security Adviser Berger and Clarke summarized for President Clinton what had been accomplished against bin Laden. An active program to disrupt al Qaeda cells around the world was underway and recording some success. The efforts to track bin Laden’s finances with help from Saudi Arabia had not yet been successful.”

Bush Administration National Security Advisor, Condoleeza Rice’s testimony before the commission states, “Under [Bush’s] leadership, the U.S. and our allies are disrupting terrorist operations, cutting off their funding and hunting down terrorists one by one. Their world is getting smaller. The terrorists have lost a home base and training camps in Afghanistan. The governments of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia now pursue them with energy and force.”

Upon questioning by 9/11 Commissioner John Lehman, Condoleeza Rice was asked, “Were you aware of the activities of the Saudi Ministry of Religious Affairs here in the United States during the transition? And Rice replied, “I believe that only after September 11th did the full extent of what was going on with the Ministry of Religious Affairs become evident.”

Lehman continued, “Were you aware of the extensive activities of the Saudi government in supporting over 300 radical teaching schools and mosques around the country, including right here in the United States?“ Rice replied, “I believe we’ve learned a great deal more about this and addressed it with the Saudi government since 9/11.”

Staff Statement #9, “Law Enforcement, Counterterrorism, and Intelligence Collection in the United States Prior to 9/11” in its “Terrorist Financing” section states, “Prior to September 11, these FBI offices had been able to gain a basic understanding of some of the largest and most problematic terrorist financing conspiracies that have since been identified. The agents understood that there was a network of extremist organizations operating within the U.S. supporting a global Islamic jihad movement. They did not know the degree to which these extremist groups were associated with al Qaeda…The FBI operated a web of informants, conducted electronic surveillance, and had opened investigations in a number of field offices. Numerous field offices including New York, San Diego, Minneapolis, Chicago, and Detroit had significant intelligence investigations into groups that appeared to be raising money for Islamic extremist groups. Many of these groups appeared to the FBI to have some connection to either al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden.”

The 9/11 Commission’s Final Report states, “When Bin Laden arrived in Afghanistan, he relied on the Taliban until he was able to reinvigorate his fund-raising efforts drawing on ties to wealthy Saudi individuals…Al Qaeda appears to have relied on a core group of financial facilitators who raised money from a variety of donors…particularly in Saudi Arabia. Some surely knew the ultimate destination of their donations. It does not appear that any government other than the Taliban financially supported al Qaeda before 9/11, although some governments may have contained al Qaeda sympathizers who turned a blind eye to al Qaeda’s fundraising activities. Saudi Arabia has long been considered the primary source of al Qaeda funding but we have found no evidence that the Saudi government individually funded the organization. This conclusion does not exclude the likelihood that charities with significant Saudi government sponsorship diverted funds to al Qaeda. Al Qaeda found fertile fund-raising ground in Saudi Arabia, where extreme religious views are common and charitable giving was both essential to the culture and subject to very limited oversight. To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks.“ (170-172)

Of particular note is footnote #86 from Chapter 6, “From Threat to Threat” that states, “CIA analytic reports, “Usama Bin Ladin: Some Saudi Financial Ties Probably Intact,” OTI IR 99-005CX, Jan 11, 1999, “How Bin Ladin Commands a Global Terrorist Network,” CTC 99-40003, Jan 27, 1999, “Islamic Terrorists: Using Nongovernmental Organizations Extensively,” CTC 99-40007, April 9, 1999.

Also of note, footnote #29 from Chapter 7, “The Attack Looms,” that details a description of the two San Diego hijackers Hazmi and al Mihdhar stating, “He recalled Hazmi and al Mihdar arriving at the mosque on their own and describing themselves as clerks employed by the Saudi Arabian government. The two said they needed help finding a school where they could study English which neither spoke well enough. The mosque administrator suspected that Mihdar might have been an intelligence agent of the Saudi government… We have no evidence contradicting the administrator’s account.

From these statements, it can be seen that there was clearly a “network of extremist organizations operating within the U.S. supporting a global Islamic Jihad movement.” In addition, it seems crystal clear that at least one foreign government was supporting these networks of extremist organizations. As stated by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the world’s largest source of funds for Islamist militant groups is Saudi Arabia. Clinton stated, “More needs to be done since Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al Qaeda, the Taliban, and other terrorist groups.”

It’s my opinion that the 28 pages will clarify the network of Saudis that supported the 9/11 hijackers. This network will likely have links to the Saudi Islamic Affair Ministry—“well known in intelligence circles to be the Saudi’s fifth column in support of Muslim extremists.” In addition, clarification of the roles and connections to the 9/11 hijackers of several people will also likely happen with the release of the 28 pages. These people include: Fahad al Thumairy, Omar al Bayoumi, Osama Bassnan, Anwar Awlaki, and Eyad al Rababah. Go ahead and google them. The damning facts are plain to see.

More notably, the 28 pages will likely reveal that the FBI and CIA had open investigations with several of the aforementioned people both before and after the 9/11 attacks. This fact, alone, will prove to be uncomfortable since it will be difficult to explain why the 9/11 attacks were not prevented.

Furthermore, it will be difficult to understand why certain facts involving the aforementioned individuals were conveniently ignored and not fully investigated after the 9/11 attacks by the FBI, CIA, and the 9/11 Commission.

So, please do me a favor: when you hear someone shrieking about all the dangerous reciprocal lawsuits being created as a result of the 9/11 families wanting to hold funders of mass murder accountable, look carefully into those good people’s involvement with the Saudis or less than successful intelligence policies.

And when you hear about certain Senators who outright or secretly oppose legislation that would ensure nations like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are held accountable for their funding of mass terrorism attacks, check to see what their involvement with the KSA has been for the past fifteen years.

Finally, when you notice a person speaking out against ordinary citizens’ undeniable right to hold mass murderers accountable, look ever so closely and carefully because most likely there’s a reason they’re worried – and it’s got nothing to do with this nation’s well-being.

President Obama tells us we will have to wait another 60 days for the release of the 28 pages. I certainly hope that the President recognizes that anything less than the release of the full 28 pages will be seen as further proof of this government’s cover up of Saudi Arabia’s role in the 9/11 attacks.

The clock is ticking …and the 9/11 families, along with the rest of America, are paying close attention.

(9/11 widows Patty Casazza, Monica Gabrielle, Mindy Kleinberg, and Lorie Van Auken also sign their names to this blog)

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • diogenes

    Zelikow was also the director of the Project For A New American Century whose report described the benefits to be anticipated from a “new Pearl Harbor.” He as also the edtor of the original publication of the tapes from the Kennedy White House during the Cuban Missile crisis (The Kennedy Tapes, Harvard University Press, 1997) later exposed by Sheldon Stern (Averting the Final Failure, Stanford University Press, 2003) as being riddled with omissions and distortions. There is reason to suppose that Zelikow was interested in covering up far more than whatever Saudi involvement there was in 9/11 and it is clear that he prevented the Commission from faithfully performing its functions, as several Commissioners have since stated.

    • GetReal

      Amazing the things you will find when you start peeling away the layers. Of course the media will never connect the dots for the sheeple. We could keep a firing squad busy for weeks getting justice…..

  • Simone

    The author of this piece of crap should try to find a rational and logical explanation of how the Saudi government could have been involved in the destruction of World Trade Center 7 (WTC7 or Salomon Brothers’ Building)…if that moron is unable to provide a sensible answer, then it will show that this blog is simply managed by private interests focused on diverting attention that points to the real perpetrators of 9/11.

    No plane hit WTC7 on 09/11/2001 and the skyscraper collapsed on its own footprint at 5:20 pm that day…how Saudi Arabia was involved on this event?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnLcUxV1dPo

    • diogenes

      Thank you for asking this simple cogent damning question. Game over.

    • Southernfink

      Think outside the box.

      It’s not just a matter of pointing the bone at a single government….but exactly who are these forces that direct them.

      For that can we need to start holding war criminals accountable, and before these start claiming senility or die from old age.

    • GetReal

      Obviously they had lots of help from within the US power structure. 9/11 was larger than any 1 team could have pulled off all by itself.

  • Southernfink

    In anticipation of the 28 pages — Awaiting the next 60 days.

    Be expecting a media softening up campaign.

  • Dee

    Dear Americans,
    Forgive this intrusion from a foreign peanut gallery:
    Ever heard of a RED HERRING?
    sigh … How does one begin to penetrate the apparent lingering cognitive dissonance (aka brain damage ) inflicted in the greatest psy op attack on consciousness-intellect for the greatest crime of ongoing perpetual imperial hegemonic war by what must be the greatest evil regime ever in the history of mankind.
    Please just THINK :
    From the very first hours on 0911, you were told by your ‘authorities’ that Saudis were responsible for the atrocity … 19 Saudi ‘hijackers’ named, the Saudi ‘terrorist’ Osama Boogeyman immediately made a household name; Saudi citizens Mohammed Atta et al kept in your CODE RED / ORANGE fracked psyche forever …
    So WHAT ‘COVER UP’ of Saudi involvement are we talking about?!!
    For exactly THE OPPOSITE happened : Every miraculous event of 0911 was pinned on Saudi’s.
    And those miracles are truly amazing if you care to spend 1 minute clearing the mind fracking and doing some THINK and research.
    Not research of utter rubbish by your long established back-up gatekeepers, disinfo agents and charlatans capitalising on horror with books and videos and movies …
    As a not directly involved southern hemisphere nonAmerican, I’d recommend :
    1. Where Did the Towers Go … do your own critical analysis of evidence presented youtubes or book by Dr Judy Wood … and then lets talk about Saudis’ Moslem “terrorists”
    2. Behind the Smoke Curtain … ditto on meticulous sleuthing by Barbara Honniger in book or youtube …
    and if after really considering what those 2 extraordinary American women present .. you still think a Saudi fella on dialysis dying of kidney disease hanging out in a cave in Tora Bora directed 19 whorin’ boozin’ Saudi Moslem fanatics to penetrate the worlds most secure skies and building … well then I have to ask you :
    What’s your take on the Easter Bunny darlin’?

      • Dee

        I really enjoyed that! Thank you 🙂 …. and especially for being conscious and aware.

    • diogenes

      Thank you Dee. What you don’t understand is the brain-melting effects of American public education and media. The Easter Bunny is our national bird.

      • Dee

        Yes .. Unfortunately my nation is under IMF control, so the same dumbing down “Outcomes Based Education” (equivalent of US ‘Common core’) prescribed here .. along with almost all policy prescribed by Vulture Capitalists it seems – and no sovereignty over the central bank where we are listed as a mere commodity on NY stock exchange … and the multinationals extract resource at slave wage, sell on to shell company at a loss / minimum profit so little or no tax paid locally .. before selling on again at mega profits in the 1st World AngloAmerica-Europe nations … and re-purchase of the commodity or product at staggering 10000% 🙁 .
        Such is the progress of galloping globalisation and vulture capitalism for the benefit of a tiny minority …

        While all Anglo nations (and beyond) are subjected to the SAME media – that is owned by 6 interlocked corporations with the shared directors across all of them having vested interests in war and globalisation agenda ….
        International news all cut and pasted from 1 AngloZiodom source .. and any difference in the channels is same backed beans in a different branded tin

        The Easter Bunny is live and well inside your nation …. but, sadly, whose face is more akin to The Bald Vampire Vulture outside your fairest shores … addicted to blood and corpses at perpetual war …fooling the Easter Bunnies by “leading from behind” e.g. poor Slavs, now lining the front line cannon fodder local forces in the Baltics …poking the Bear along every border and wailing “Russian Aggeression” …similarly being foolishly provocative in the S.China seas …
        while 4th Generation warfare use of proxy death cult mercenary ‘al CIAda’ terrorists is standard since Libya .. that diabolical atrocity of slaughtering Gaddafi and destroying the jewel of Africa nation opened the AFRICOM gateway with ‘Boko Haram’ paving the way to neo-colonial wars raging across the African continent (saving 270 girls – from their oil, gold, coltan etc and Chinese investment in infrastructure an old fashioned win win trade deals) …
        and channeling arms, jihadis and Red Line false flag sarin back into Syria …where the original al Queda undergoes re-branding according to day and agenda … called “moderate rebels” for arming and supporting them … “Khourasan” to get Easter Bunny land terror juices flowing so public happy to have US return to scene of rape pillage plunder tortue and destruction in Iraq to fight “ISIS / ISIL / Daesh” – the upgraded to sexy Madison Avenue Ninja look in the glossy brochures and boogeyman videos ..

        S.America & especially BRICS Brazil not spared the total global dominance onslaught of the Corporate Fundamentalist Fanatics waging Global Crusades for their almighty called Petro Dollar … and a long in the NSA-Wall Street banker planning hybrid coup in progress there
        sigh
        We all live in what the Chinese curse calls “interesting times”
        But none of us are our kakistocrat “Regimes” .. so please know, AmericaNs are still beloved part of the human family.

  • diogenes

    I used to be proud of the 9/11 widows. I wonder what happened to them?

  • Bob

    I agree with Dee. Let’s start with the fact no proof has ever been presented that showed these supposed hijackers even got on any planes on 911. There should have been plenty of videotape evidence as well as passenger manifests. The numerous military exercises that were taking place and thereby interfered with normal responses to hijackers, a convenient excuse, was never adequately investigated. There are many professional pilots who insist these types of aircraft could not perform the maneuvers required at the reported speed in order to hit WTC 1 and 2, especially by pilots with poor skills. No evidence has ever been presented which proves passenger jets hit the Pentagon or crashed into the PA field. The collapse of WTC7 appears to be a controlled demolition, as does the complete collapses of the two towers which disintegrated and blew apart with enough force to eject multi-ton chunks of steel hundreds of feet. Bits of first responders who were in those structures flesh and bone were found on rooftops hundreds of feet away. They were blown apart, not crushed under debris from a gravitational collapse due to fire. So maybe the Saudis were involved, but if they were they were co-collaberators. I doubt they provided the planes, drones, cruise missiles, or whatever flew around that day. I doubt they provided or planted the explosives in the buildings. They had help and it’s no coincidence the US or Israel is not being blamed to the degree the Saudis are.