The American Public Informs President Obama’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues About Ongoing Non-Consensual Human Experimentation in the USA Today

by guest author Ramola D/The Everyday Concerned Citizen (bio below, with information provided by Karla Smith, Norman Rabin, and Peace Pink.

We’ve documented US government use of harmful and deadly experiments upon the public (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here for just a few, and that the US tortures people in Orwellian violation of six binding areas of law). Ramola’s testimony of being a “targeted individual” is here.

Last week, on March 3, 2016, five years after the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues received (and it seems, ultimately ignored) the historic and powerful testimony of over forty individuals at meetings in Washington DC and New York (March and May 2011)—while over 300 Americans registered, and nearly 600 tried to register to speak—testifying to their ongoing, unwilling enrollment in non-consensual human experimentation with military-grade electromagnetic (EMF) neurotechnology projects in the USA, several wrote in to the 24th meeting of this Commission, focused on Pedagogy in Bioethics, to remind the Commission of this yet-unaddressed violation of ethics, human rights, and humanity.

(Transcripts of their testimony in 2011 can be found here and here. Important to note in this story is that mainstream media refused to even cover this testimony, although videos can be found on Youtube, and transcripts are posted online at the Commission’s website; according to reports from witnesses, at the Feb 28-March 1 meeting in Washington DC, reporters inexplicably rose and left the room when testimonies began; at the May 18-19 meeting in New York, all reporters except two failed to return after a break to the room where testimonies were being given. See reports at Peace Pink.)

Non-Consensual Experimentation as Classified Research

March 3, 2016 letters from witnesses and activists notified President Obama’s Commission of the continued experience of invasive remotely-applied electromagnetic signals on their bodies, in what has been identified today by researchers as non-consensual human experimentation being conducted under cover of classified research by Federal agencies such as possibly, the CIA, DARPA, DIA, and NSA as well as other departments of the Military/Air Force/Navy in experimental Intelligence Surveillance activities, Criminal Justice activities, Non-Lethal/Directed Energy Weapons testing, and Neuro-Experimentation/Cybernetics activities. Technologies being reported appear to be Neurotechnologies/Artificial Intelligence/Supercomputing aimed at Pre-Crime, Mind/Behavior Modification/Control, and Mass Human Control by means of microwave/millimeter wave/radio wave/RFID/neurostimulator weapons and implantable medical devices.

The Common Rule is Being Changed—to Increase Exemptions and Exclusions to Informed Consent

Activists who wrote in noted also that current proposed changes (NPRM) to the Common Rule in the Code of Federal Regulations governing human subject experimentation will render the regulations much less effective in protecting human beings from unethical and non-consensual research. (The Common Rule, while based on The Belmont Report and the Nuremberg Code of Ethics, is a Federal Code which currently provides “substantial” but not complete protections to human subjects who are involved, wittingly or unwittingly, in research. ) Earlier, in September 2015, the Department of Health and Human Services had invited public comment on the newly proposed changes to the Common Rule, being made in interests of “simplifying” and “modernizing” the “current system of oversight”. About 45-50 individuals reporting the experience of non-consensual human experimentation by way of remotely applied radiation pulses on their bodies submitted public comments then by the January 6, 2016 closing date.

In her recent letter to the BioEthics Commission, Karla Smith noted that the proposal to newly exempt and exclude 19 categories of activities and research, as compared to 6 current exemptions, was of particular concern, as also was the proposed waiver and alterations of consent in many cases, such as the waiving of consent in the secondary (remaindered) use of biospecimens, and in the classifying of Intelligence Surveillance and Criminal Justice projects as activities not warranting the label of “research” and consequent assurances of Informed Consent. Additional concerns related to existing loopholes in the Common Rule, lack of oversight for some federal and non-federal entities, and the need for reporting and tracking.

Exemptions in Informed Consent in Classified Research Versus Consent of the Governed

Other commenters, including this writer, called attention to the effects and technologies being experienced by non-consensual experimentees, emphasizing that these are known to be under study and operation currently in public as well as classified domains, in Federally contracted projects being conducted by Defense and Intelligence agencies, often through Universities, but also through private contractors, using existing Exemptions in Informed Consent, that have been permitted by the NDAA and by Executive Orders. Nonetheless, this permitting of these experiments, technologies, and covert bodily/brain manipulations without Informed Consent, it was emphasized, could not presume the consent of American citizens, the “Consent of the Governed”: “There is No Consent of the Governed permitting non-consensual human experimentation on human subjects. Exceptions and Exemptions in Informed Consent have been appropriated by an unethical framework of unilaterally modified laws and Executive Orders, and must not be mistaken for Consent of the Governed/in the name of National Security.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans are today reporting the experience of non-consensual human experimentation with EMF radiation weapons. Several have died from it, including activists Harlan Girard and Sean Stinn. As noted in letters to the Commission, three Americans who recently lost their lives prematurely after repeated and continuous experimentation (in Jan/Feb 2016) are Ron Gillman (52, father of 2 girls), Scott Fulbright (53), and Jessica Davis Thompson (29). Letters cited conclusions by medical doctor and researcher Dr. John Hall, author of Guinea Pigs, Technologies of Control (Strategic Publishing, 2014): “Fast forward to today, we have over 300,000 people in the United States voicing complaints of electronic harassment which includes directed energy attacks and synthetic telepathic harassment. It sounds unbelievable at first until you delve further into the complaints and history of the technology.…Knowing how this research started and how it progressed as technology progressed should alarm the medical community that non-consensual experimentation is occurring rather than an exponential rise in mental illness. We have known for some time that several technologies exist that are capable of putting voices in one’s head to subliminally harass or control them. Therefore, when these complaints are voiced, it can no longer be seen as a turnkey diagnosis of mental illness.”

New Weapons, New Technologies: Inhumane Remote Accessing of Human Bodies and Brains

Letters to the Commission noted that these technologies go beyond synthetic telepathy/microwaved voices in heads, and include many remote electrical and electromagnetic devices engaging in remote biological manipulation of bodies and brains, including in their effects, and not limited to: Remote Electroshock, Remote Neuro-Muscular Stimulation, Remote Neurological Manipulation, Remote EEGs, Remote Radio Frequency Radiation deposited at various organ sites, remote brainwave manipulation and modification, remote dream manipulation, remote sexual stimulation, and more.

Further, it was noted, ALL reporting individuals, without exception, report their experience of this non-consensual experimentation on their bodies and brains as profoundly invasive, intrusive, lethal by repetition, and essentially barbaric and inhumane, and cautioned that these are not reports to be ignored by any sane or civilized or informed society, let alone by Bioethicists. Given the occasion of Meeting 24’s focus on Pedagogy, commenters asked that their letters be copied to all Bioethics departments in Universities, stating that all medical and other researchers interested in Bioethics in human subject research should be made aware of this current and ongoing situation of Extreme Unethicality, in order to address, expose, and terminate such an obvious violation of human rights and humanity in our midst.

Presidential Commission Response Fails to Address Public Concern About Non-Consensual Human Experimentation

However, given previous inexplicably non-committal responses from Obama’s Bioethical Commission to the 2011 testimonies of testifying witnesses (Valerie Bonham, Executive Director of the Commission, issued a letter to commenters in which she referred to all non-consensual neuro-experimentation complaints as “claims” of electronic harassment/psychotronic weapon use from “Targeted Individuals” which would not be heard at subsequent meetings, advising that the Commission was not a “law enforcement, regulatory, or legislative body”), it is questionable whether attempts to inform and educate the Commission of glaring breaches in Ethics in ongoing federally-funded research will have any effect. It is questionable indeed whether President Obama’s Commission, chaired by Amy Gutmann, President of the University of Pennsylvania (one of the listed Universities engaged in the CIA’s Project MKULTRA experiments), is interested at all in exploring any real issues in Bioethics, given that the primary ethical consideration of Informed Consent appears to be falling by the wayside here. How could so many testifying witnesses reporting egregious violations in Informed Consent be met with such apathy of response?

As issues of Genetic testing, Neuro-imaging, Neuroscience, and Synthetic Biology are considered by the Commission, as noted in recent meeting focuses—all new sciences potentially invasive of human autonomy and rights—yet, as we can see, without real public debate, real inclusion of public comment, and real concern about public experience of non-consensual experimentation in these areas, one must ask: Is the real purpose of the Bioethics Commission then to relax and further loosen the regulations on Informed Consent governing federally-funded research in these areas? Is the intent also to gain –or presume—public consent by a cursory public look at these new technologies and sciences as a small group of industry-serving researchers barrels through a series of pre-set meetings culminating in meaningless primers and pedagogical materials—while Americans remain unable to contribute to these “public” debates?

One of the historic witnesses at the Feb/March 2011 meeting, Gerald Schatz, a lawyer and retired Assistant Professor of Ethics and Law at Michigan State University, commented on the tenor of Commission concerns and stressed that it was “unseemly” that “we have gone from an era of very reflective and I think very decent recognition of the moral obligations of researchers to an era of discussion of regulatory burden.’ The second point he made was “that there is law out there. The bioethics community has been oblivious to it but there is international law. There is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights the United States ratified in 1992 and it makes informed consent an absolute requirement, no exceptions, not even in emergencies, subject to those normal legal fictions of consenting for the incapacitated patient to medical care and so forth. Additionally, the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols to the Geneva Conventions make research very, very difficult or prohibited altogether for those individuals who are caught up in the war and armed conflicts.”

Students, Physicians, and Real Bioethicists Need to Know the Truth About Ongoing Non-Consensual Human Experimentation Today

It is to be hoped that, despite obvious and glaring lapses in past response, and their own refusal to acknowledge the truth of ongoing unethical human experimentation in the USA today, that the Commission will, as requested by this writer, “understand that every single medical student, researcher, clinician, physician, psychologist, psychiatrist and high school science student has the right today to be fully educated in the actual truth of non-consensual human subject experimentation ongoing today in the areas of Neuro Crime, Neuro Experimentation, Neuro Modification, and others, whether by Intelligence Surveillance agencies or for Criminal Justice research” and stand up for human rights and humanity instead of letting the understanding of “Bioethics” become a meaningless shell for open deception by Federal departments and agencies avidly pursuing secrecy in research.

Neuroscientists in particular know that we stand today on the lip of a massive revolution in human affairs with the new knowledge of remote influencing technologies capable of manipulating the human body and human brain. So do the Military and Intelligence agencies. Who will speak and act today on behalf of all humanity? Who will step forward in this country to investigate, prosecute, and terminate ALL non-consensual human experimentation ongoing today? Will the real Bioethicists please stand up?

The author’s letter to the Commission may be read here.

18-minute video–Bioethics/Dr.John Hall and others–follows the transcript for Meeting 4/Public Comment linked on the Commission website (and included in article):

Church Committee Production 2.0 29-minute video showing CNN clip of Amy Gutmann, plus Presidential Bioethics Commission testimony Meeting 4, and clip of Biden on RFIDs:

50-minute video of Meeting 5/May meeting testimonies:

Related:

Outlaw Nonconsensual Human Experiments Now –– Cheryl Walsh/Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

Bioethics Commisssion Failed Obama’s Mandate in New Report — Cheryl Walsh/The Daily Censored, January 2012

FFCHS Participates in the Fifth Meeting of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

In the Name of National Security? Secret, Classified Human Subject Experimentation and Research in 2015: Where is the Public Outrage? – Ramola D/The Everyday Concerned Citizen

Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation--Julianne McKinney, Director, Electronic Surveillance Project, Dec 1992

Worldwide Campaign Against Electronic Torture and Experimentation--Paul Baird/Surveillance Issues

Bio: Ramola D’s short fiction collection Temporary Lives, (University of Massachusetts Press, 2009), was awarded the 2008 AWP Grace Paley Prize and was a finalist for the 2010 Library of Virginia Fiction award. Invisible Season, her first poetry collection, co-won the Washington Writers’ Publishing House award in 1998. Against the Conspiracy of Things, her second manuscript of poetry was a recent finalist for the 2013 Benjamin Saltman Prize, Red Hen Press. A Discovery/The Nation finalist, and five-time Pushcart Prize nominee, she is the recipient of a 2005 National Endowment for the Arts fellowship in poetry. Her fiction, poetry, essays, reviews, and writer-interviews have appeared in various journals and anthologies, including Kweli Journal, Kartika Review, Urban Confustions, Greensboro Review, Los Angeles Review, Short Review, Blackbird, Prairie Schooner, Agni, Green Mountains Review, Indiana Review, Writer’s Chronicle, Indian Express, and been reprinted in Best American Poetry 1994, Best American Fantasy 2007, Full Moon on K Street: Poems About Washington, DC, and Literal Latte’s The Anthology: Highlights from Fifteen Years of a Unique “Mind Stimulating” Literary Magazine. Her fiction was shortlisted under 100 Other Distinguished Stories in Best American Stories 2007, and included in the anthologies Enhanced Gravity: More Fiction by Washington DC Women Writers (Paycock Press, 2006), All About Skin: Short Fiction by Women Writers of Color (University of Wisconsin Press, 2011), and Extraordinary Rendition: (American) Writers on Palestine (Oregon Books, 2015).   Ramola holds an MFA from George Mason University and a BS in Physics and MBA from the University of Madras. She has most recently taught Creative Writing at The George Washington University and at The Writer’s Center, Bethesda. She is the founder and editor of Delphi Quarterly, an online journal for writer, poet, and filmmaker interviews. She currently lives in the Boston area with her husband and daughter, and runs art and creative writing workshops for children while working on a novel, short fiction, poetry, and children’s books.

Resources:

The “Neutralizing” of US Dissent With Neuroweaponry: Open Letter to Journalists and Human Rights Advocates and Organizations in the USA and Worldwide

In 2015, Covert Non-Consensual RFID/MEMS (Microchip) Implants Are a Reality Everyone Should Know About

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Tool of the Red Terror, Makes a Comeback in Authoritarian USA & Other Western “Democracies”

2015: “Targeted Individuals” are Non-Consensual Subjects in Criminal, Clandestine, Classified “Top Secret” MKULTRA-Extended Mind & Behavior Control/Torture Experimentation by Joint Military/Intel/Justice/Academic Institutions, as well as Targets of COINTELPRO and Electronic Warfare

Is the US Department of Justice Secretly Permitting Local Law Enforcement & the Military to Assault American Citizens Using Covert Directed-Energy “Non-Lethal” Weapons?

The “Deep State” Hides in Plain Sight: Organized Covert Harassment Points to Overreach and Abuse of Powers by Out-of-Control Intel Agencies

Ex-CIA and MI5 Agent and Whistleblower Carl Clark Reveals Covert Electromagnetic Torture of Civilians by Intel Agencies in US/UK/Europe/Asia with Directed Energy “Non-Lethal” Neuroweapons

Dr. Steven Greer: How the Secret Government Works — UFO Secrecy, Unacknowledged Special Access Projects, Scalar Technologies, Disinfo Tactics  (Includes Disclosure/Open Admissions on DEWs & EMFs, Targeting, RFIDs, Psychiatrist Complicity, Controlled Media)

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Todd Giffen

    First this isn’t really experimentation. This is about torture and assault of citizens. The technology deployed is used for spying on all Americans and communication brain to brain by police officers. It also allows torture and discrediting of victims to be done. There isn’t a pattern of experimentation that can be observed in the common day. The weapon system in place is called the ballistic missile defense and it’s a general multi purpose through wall and object surveillance tool and energy weapon/cybernetic warfare system. It works on electronics, environments and humans/nervous systems equally.

    The cops nationwide and most city officials take part in protecting its existence and hiding victims, covering up crimes of its use.

    Senate, Congress and the President and governor are fully aware of its use to hurt people and they permit it.

    In fact I spoke to Lisa Lee the executive director of the bioethics committee and she fully informed me Barack Obama knew about this, they knew of my case and they also said it was Barack’s personal decision that nothing is being done about it. Here is the audio recording of Lisa Lee and me talking at the November 175th 2015 meeting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgKOca2wcFM

    Its called deliberate indifference my friends.

    America has never prosecuted anyone for murder, torture, surveillance, civil rights violations, international law violations, war crimes or anything in America. They have all been told to do it and have built up quite the powerful empire and stock pile of secret capabilities. Government agents have been fully aware and complicit along time. The military industrial complex is fully involved and complicit nationwide. No one ever intends to help us through advocacy or handouts. We need an Army of our own and money to somehow enforce our rights.

    We need a Nuremberg trial to convict and execute these pathetic sons of bitches to take back government from them. http://www.DrRobertDuncan.com http://www.ObamasWeapon.com

  • Todd Giffen

    First this isn’t really experimentation. This is about torture and assault of citizens. The technology deployed is used for spying on all Americans and communication brain to brain by police officers. It also allows torture and discrediting of victims to be done. There isn’t a pattern of experimentation that can be observed in the common day. The weapon system in place is called the ballistic missile defense and it’s a general multi purpose through wall and object surveillance tool and energy weapon/cybernetic warfare system. It works on electronics, environments and humans/nervous systems equally.

    The cops nationwide and most city officials take part in protecting its existence and hiding victims, covering up crimes of its use.

    Senate, Congress and the President and governor are fully aware of its use to hurt people and they permit it.

    In fact I spoke to Lisa Lee the executive director of the bioethics committee and she fully informed me Barack Obama knew about this, they knew of my case and they also said it was Barack’s personal decision that nothing is being done about it. Here is the audio recording of Lisa Lee and me talking at the November 17th 2015 meeting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgKOca2wcFM

    Its called deliberate indifference my friends.

    America has never prosecuted anyone for murder, torture, rape, experimentation, surveillance, civil rights violations, international law violations, war crimes or anything in America. They have all been told to do it and have built up quite the powerful empire and stock pile of secret capabilities. Government agents have been fully aware and complicit along time. The military industrial complex is fully involved and complicit nationwide. Hospitals, courts, law enforcement, military, officials, doctors, lawyers, pretty much the whole system is corrupt. No one ever intends to help us through advocacy or handouts otherwise we already all would of gotten help. Today the focus is on cover up and each person involved staying secure and out of prison. We need an Army of our own and money to somehow enforce our rights.

    One issue with the courts is we have no real due process and very weak protections. They have thrown out every TI case to date and stone walled us to protect these atrocities. In fact every US District, Appeal, and US Supreme Court Judge is President appointed and it’s very easy to hand pick every judge who is an insider and already “in” on the countries most secret programs and abuses, and all are usually a former military industrial complex member and conspirator, prosecutor or otherwise, to dismiss and control every victim to ensure nothing is ever done to protect us. The system is controlled this precisely. I have seen 1000s of valid dismissed complaints/lawsuits in federal court about these abuses. The judges dismiss them as frivolous and delusional when they are neither, to protect themselves and the ones involved. The cases are dismissed despite multiple 100000s of confirmed MKUltra victims who were tortured and mutilated mimicking today’s issue and whistleblowers and doctors backing victims up. In fact I discovered there were no successful lawsuits at all even over MKUltra inside America- the only case that made it through with damages was a Canadian case with 10 victims awarded $100000 each. There is no way around it. Our government is rotten and corrupt. Our courts are the backbone for the corruption.

    We need a Nuremberg trial to convict and execute these pathetic sons of bitches to take back government from them. http://www.DrRobertDuncan.com http://www.ObamasWeapon.com http://www.williambinney.com http://www.RussellTice.com http://www.ThomasDrake.xyz http://www.MyronMaysFlashDrive.com http://www.AaronAlexisNavyShooter.com

    • voiceofmillions

      Thanks for posting this information, Todd, and for both recording and posting your audio conversation with Lisa Lee, Executive Director of the Presidential Bioethics Commission. It is extraordinary that in acknowledging your concerns, her reiteration that your information would be “part of the permanent record” was her sole contribution to recording and exposing this crime.

      We have moved into a state of only-slightly-masked totalitarianism in the US and many other countries worldwide, and everything you say above about secret policing, control, torture, and assaults on citizens rings true.

      However there is also experimentation going on. Two things are going on side by side, condoned and permitted by this Administration: the covert, undisclosed use of classified neuroweapons masquerading as “non-lethal” weapons covertly permitted for use by local law-enforcement and military groups via Memoranda of Understanding between the DoD and DOJ, as revealed by Dr. Nick Begich, and the ongoing roll-out of neuro-experimentation programs run under classified labels by military/Intelligence groups (and revealed by many, including Dr. Robert Duncan), and therefore dispensing with Informed Consent–a crime of extensive proportion–as well as lending themselves to secrecy under CIA/DoD/DOJ classification as “sources and methods of intelligence,” “electronic surveillance,” “criminal justice,” “neurocrime,” “predictive policing,” and other broad generalities and misnomers. (It’s about Neural Imaging, Neural Networking, Electronic Brain Links, Hiving Minds, Remote Encephalograms–reading brain waves, which they think they can get away with by classifying as essential for pre-determining criminality. True Minority Report style.)

      Because this experimentation is classified, they are seeking to label everyone as schizoid and delusional who reports it–in desperate attempts to keep this deadly neuro-control program secret, to dismiss the profoundly important testimony of experiencing subjects, and to keep their criminally classified experiments chugging on. Psychologists, journalists, and human rights organizations appear to be complicit in this project.

      As you and I know, none of this is secret anymore. These are deadly assaults on humanity and Will and Must be stopped.

      Ultimately both facets of this are about Control. Control of activists and whistleblowers with covert weapon-use, control of non-consensual experimentees by naming them nuts, intended control of large populations to keep them docile and unquestioning via the neuro-means they are testing out currently on non-consensual subjects–this is part of an imagined One-World global-governance future, where no-one protests their enslavement, as they are turned into transhumanized, nanotech’d, robotized, quarter-humans whose every thought is controlled.

      Yes, it is more than time for arrests, it is more than time for complete exposure, and it is more than time to break open wide the whole rotten edifice of classification and secrecy which permits these crimes to ever have occurred, and to exist at all. We must continue to expose the Presidential Bioethics Commission: Why? Because they have been informed, over and over again, and they’re choosing to ignore all of it. This is Not a “regulatory” issue or law-enforcement issue–perhaps that is the Cover for the experimentation too, a set-up spot to point to while crimes and criminals are empowered to continue their experimentation (may work both ways)–this is about unethical, non-consensual, invasive, 24/7, torture-style, human experimentation, assault, and abuse under classified labels, and we must let them know it is Not acceptable, not any part of it.

      • Todd Giffen

        Experiments are technically banned under executive orders and law. The directed energy stuff – you can’t argue they have been doing the same “experiments” for decades and decades. To argue they did a test of the weapon at first seems legitimate, but then later it has to move into operational use. Their weapon was designed to torture and simulate mental illnesses on any target of the American or global population. You can’t keep calling it experimentation after decades of use.

        • voiceofmillions

          Good point. It’s most certainly operational. In both facets–in criminal justice and in classified research. The labels being used obviously are all in the realm of Information warfare–essentially, lies, semantic deceit, misnomers. I especially appreciate that you note that their remote-control radiation weapons are designed to torture and simulate mental illness–while at the same time the President makes public proclamations about the rise of mental illness in the US, and the need for more attention in that area.

          DEWs though: they’re/DoD/USAF are still issuing multi-million dollar contracts to “test” bio-effects (See FedBizOpps.gov) of DEWs; a FOIA request I made on the $49 million 2013, still-ongoing USAF contract which is testing DEWs on human subjects to determine bio-effects shows their (redacted) contract as testing millimeter-wave weapons on humans, in labs, they say, with consenting volunteers. It’s redacted, so I cannot conclude they are Not testing in the field. Further, as you point out, weapons-testing may in itself be a cover.

          Experiments on Americans: they Should be banned under law, but they are not. Please check the NDAA, the Patriot Act, EO 12333, and the CFR–Informed Consent is not required currently in classified research, and the Department of Health and Human Services is currently seeking to relax requirements even further with changes to the Common Rule, as noted in this article. Also, please look up the report issued by this Bioethics Commission–scope for a new article–where one can read the viewpts of scientists who believe certain experiments benefit from using “unwitting” human subjects. I need to read it more closely before I can write further to address it. I have only recently woken up to the fact that this subject is precisely where one can begin to fully expose, address, and challenge the criminality that is going on here, under guise of Justice and secrecy.

        • Obviously it’s now operational. But I think they’re still in a sense experimenting and collecting data to refine how they can pull off what kinds of effects on different people. So they can refine their methods to control ALL kinds of people, not just the most common types. How to refine their methods to which kinds of mental resistance, etc.