South Carolina Democratic Party Means Well

The chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party called to complain that I was being unfair to him, and maybe he was right. But I’d simply urged the need to avoid any appearance of bias, and if the chairman doesn’t understand that, he’s in for a heck of a lot more criticism than he’s ever imagined. This is his bio on the party website at 11:15 a.m. ET on Friday, February 26, just after he called me:

The Washington Times had prompted Harrison’s call with this article:

. . . What his bio on the party’s Web page doesn’t mention, though, is that Mr. Harrison is also a principal at the Podesta Group, a lobbying firm founded by brothers Tony and John Podesta — the same John Podesta who is chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Mr. Harrison’s day job is likely to get more scrutiny as the presidential campaign turns to South Carolina and questions continue to swirl about whether the Democratic Party apparatus is fairly treating Mrs. Clinton’s challenger, Sen. Bernard Sanders of Vermont. . . .

“If you want to avoid appearances of conflict of interest, you need to be completely open and reveal that,” said David Swanson, a spokesman at, a progressive online group that also has organized a petition asking for the ouster of the head of the Democratic National Committee. “Someone can be in favor of one candidate and still conduct a fair primary election, but if they’re hiding that they have close ties — beyond just electoral interest, but with actual monetary interests — that starts to look bad.”

Harrison called me up and recounted his long connections with staffers for Bernie Sanders, and said that he had been the first to invite Sanders to come speak even before he was officially a candidate. Harrison said he’d also had Sanders as the first ever guest in his video series called “Chair Chats.” Here’s that video:

And here’s one with Hillary Clinton, which has about half as many views.

Harrison said he’d offered Sanders the party’s resources and conference room, that his own Deputy Executive Director had gone to work for the Sanders campaign, that anything he and the party had done for Clinton they’d done for Sanders, and that I could ask the Sanders campaign and they’d say as much.

I said I was certain they would indeed, whether true or not, but that I had merely answered a reporter’s question on one point, that of Harrison’s bio on the party site leaving out what he did for a living, namely that he worked for a Clinton-affiliated organization. Amazingly, Harrison claimed not to know whether his bio included that info or not. He blamed me for not investigating it myself, while he himself claimed not to have looked into it either. And he assured me that if I “googled” him I’d see that he worked for the Podesta Group.

But isn’t that the point, I asked? If I google Santorum I’ll find something else entirely, but that’s what Google shows, not what Santorum chooses to display. If everyone can find out that your paycheck comes from a Clinton-associated group, but that’s left out of your bio, how does that look? Harrison promised to look into it and to make sure that it said from now on right at the top: “Jamie Harrison, chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party and Principle at the Podesta Group….”

I said I thought that would be a good idea.

The Podesta Group was founded by John and Tony Podesta, the former serving also as Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair.

I explained to Harrison that my concern was not over any actual unfair treatment I knew him to have engaged in, but over the appearance of it in a context that had everyone understandably on the lookout for bias. I pointed out to him that the DNC Chair was quite openly on Hillary Clinton’s side, had sought to minimize debates and hide them on Saturday nights and other times of low viewership, had sought to deny Sanders access to his own voter files, had just opened up the Democratic Party to money from corporate lobbyists to benefit one candidate, had refused to release the results in Iowa, etc., and that the Party had its superdelegates lined up for Hillary in open defiance of popular will.

Harrison said he agreed with me that the superdelegate system and the electoral college for that matter should be scrapped. And he agreed with my blaming the DNC, which he pointed out was not the South Carolina Democratic Party.

The funny thing is, after I hung up, I looked at Harrison’s bio on the Podesta Group website. That bio is very open about his Democratic Party identifications. And they include this: “Member of the DNC Executive Committee.”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • wehaveseenthisb4

    Isn’t a basic tenet of politics to establish as many conflict of interests as possible and take advantage of everyone of them as fully as possible?

    • unheilig

      Only if you’re a Republican, or named Clinton.

  • Mr Boompi

    After the Citizens United case this particular conflict of interest seems minor. I’ll bet some of the Republican establishment actually support Clinton over Trump so we may see a lot of strange things happen over the next 6 months.

  • Genessender

    Hard to believe this was a simple oversight. Mr Harrison’s actions bear close watching.

  • unheilig

    Simple. Don’t vote Democrat or give money to the party. Vote for Bernie Sanders and give money to his campaign.

    • Don Robertson

      Let me make myself clear, though I vote in every election, I am not necessarily supporting any candidate for president. These candidates don’t speak to me. The only candidate I would support for the high office of president would be a candidate who would talk about the need to emphasize the basics by presenting a persuasive -fundamentalarity- of their core belief.

      My core belief concerns the quality, enjoyment and sustainability of the human experience. My core belief has nothing whatsoever to do with humanitarianism, economic growth or scientific progress. The pursuit of these three existential goals seem to me to be what is destroying the planet and the quality of human life at break-neck pace.

      I am not a humanitarian. I find humanitarianism a societally debilitating delusion that prevents society from realizing the potential to maximize the enjoyment and sustainability of the human experience. We’re headed toward hell in a handbasket, (if we’re not already there), while being led by legions of well-certified scoundrels who push an odd and dangerous scientific-humanitarianism, while completely ignoring the effect of such a belief on the overall quality, enjoyment and sustainability of the human experience.

      This lack of -fundamentalarity- in the views of those who profess to be humanitarians, whether Christians, Jews, Muslims or Buddhists, scientific-humanitarians or otherwise, seems to be at the core of the public’s collective inability to make progress, preserving the quality of human life.

      I was interested to hear Bernie Sanders speak. Unfortunately, watching the video it became clear for me Bernie Sanders is a humanitarian whose world views are diametrically opposed to mine. The failure of these humanitarian believers to be realistic about what is possible, and what is more than likely to happen as the years continue to unfold, completely rule out any of Bernie Sanders goals, even were they laudible goals, even were he to get elected.

      For time immemorial human life, its quality, enjoyment and sustainability were givens for the human experience. Yes, there have always been dangers that any given individual life might become truncated or a living hell, but no one is really reducing this possibility. People young and old die, become diseased, or suffer someway or other. That’s always been true, and it seems to be the odds of such a calamity are increasing daily for all.

      Today, I find no political candidate with a vision, or a fundamentalarity, that could possibly make things better. They each want to sell us this idea that they can help make things less worse than they would be otherwise, were THEY not elected.

      I call, bullshit. A vote for Bernie Sanders or any in the group of candidates, is likely just a vote for another delusion.

      I’m for bringing back the death penalty. Why are we paying for these scoundrels to lounge in prisons?

      Death Penalty Crimes (in order of nastiness) should include-

      Corrupt judges
      Corrupt politicians
      Corrupt bureaucrats

      Drug dealers
      Illegal immigrants
      Environmental polluters (like CEOs of General Electric and Monsanto)
      Corrupt company CEOs, like the CIA’s Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates

      Capital punishment is just a start. I think dueling should be made legal again. This would solve lots of problems in everyone’s neighborhood.

      You see, for me, Donald Trump is a mere pussycat.

      Where is my presidential candidate????