Targeted Individuals: testimony of current government covert torture & control experiments

We’ve documented US government use of harmful and deadly experiments upon the public (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here for just a few, and that the US tortures people in Orwellian violation of six binding areas of law). This is the story of a reader who contacted us. Another reader with similar testimony, Elizabeth Coady of Chicago, submitted the following image: “Here is an X-ray showing what I’ve deduced is telemetry wire. It’s activated several times a day, and is only one of the devices in me. They have ‘triangulated’ devices in me to cause severe internal burning, and once a three-week bout of radiation enteritis. I cannot find a doctor to remove this device.” If anyone knows of a willing doctor in that area, please contact me and I’ll send the information to Elizabeth.

FullSizeRender.jpg

Dated Jan 3, 2016

Ramola D

154 Pine Street

Quincy, Massachusetts

I am a writer, teacher, concerned citizen, and activist. I have marched in anti-war marches against the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, worked briefly at Bread for the World and longer at the American Red Cross, I have held up signs with PETA, Compassion for Animals, and Mercy for Animals at numerous protests against animal cruelty at labs, circuses, and elsewhere, I have created and signed petitions and made public comment on issues concerning animals, the environment, people, children, I have run community cable TV shows on environmental and animal protections issues, volunteered for years at homeless shelters in Washington DC and Arlington, Virginia, and read news (for years) for the blind. I believe in speaking out against cruelty and injustice, and I have always acted on this belief.

I have taught English Composition and Creative Writing at various Universities, including for several years at The George Washington University. In 2011, after a family move from DC to Boston, I started a creative arts and writing workshop center for children at my home (www.artcreatewrite.com), and taught art locally at a preschool and at an arts center. During this time I was also working on a novel and other projects, volunteered at my daughter’s school, ran a literary quarterly online (www.delphiquarterly.com), and was active as a citizen, signing petitions online.

In the Fall of 2013, I wrote to my Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren as well as the State Representative for my county, Tackey Chan, (copying my emails to the Boston Globe and the Quincy Patriot Ledger) regarding tree damage I was witnessing everywhere in my neighborhood and asking about the “chem trails” or aerosols/geo-engineering which I saw was going on directly overhead. At this time, I also spoke out at my daughter’s school, Adams Montessori School in Quincy, Massachusetts, to a School Board member (Treasurer Sinead Walsh), expressing my opposition to charging extra childcare fees for babysitting at a school parent-teacher conference. I mention this because subsequent behavior–guilty looks and evasiveness–from the School Board President (Alexander Steffan) indicated to me that he was possibly the person involved–in a vindictive act of retaliation and petty malice–in giving my name, or selling my name, as a paid NSA/DHS/FBI informant to the corrupt cartel of Intel agencies, military, and law enforcement–JTRIG–that I believe today is currently engaged in covertly targeting, assaulting, harassing, surveilling, and terminally experimenting on thousands of innocent Americans–as well as people worldwide. (In my current assessment, I think this is part of the globalists’ bid for their Orwellian New World Order; it seems to have its roots right here though, in the DHS/CIA/Military.)

I was hit with radiation pulses from covert weaponry within two weeks. Since November 2013, I have been, and continue to be the subject of continuous, 24/7 covert assault with Directed-Energy so-called “Non-Lethal” microwave/scalar/sonic weapons (more on this below) both from ground vehicles speeding into our neighborhood and parking to hit, from neighbors’ houses, and from low-flying planes and helicopters which come in frequently into our neighborhood to circle, hover, and direct radar hits, covert implantation with RFID tracking chips, vile character assassination in my neighborhood and local communities, major job and small business sabotage, overt surveillance, harassment, and hostility from my clearly-co-opted neighborhood, continuous COINTELPRO stalking and harassment actions everywhere I go, break-ins to my home, the planting of bugs in my home,  “notifications” to every public place I visit, whether a gym, library, school, or restaurant, as well as tracking and “concealed electronic/consensual monitoring” from neighbors, community members, and “notified” premises, just about everywhere I go. I have also experienced being radio-frequency-hit at airports, and on airplanes, and on Amtrak and local subways–both on domestic flights–to Chicago/New York and on transatlantic flights to India. (American Airlines, Southwest Air, Qatar/Emirates Airlines)

This is how it started:

Less than two weeks after I wrote the letters to representatives–before all replies arrived–extremely strange things began to happen on our street, in our house, around our house, and to my person:

  1. A disproportionate number of strange cars, vans, SUVs, trucks, utility vehicles began to roar into our normally quiet street and park around and near our house, during the daytime and the night.
  2. This was followed by cars being parked directly outside my house and strangers in cars watching as I left and entered the house, and following me as I drove out.
  3. I began to be stalked and followed by groups of cars everywhere I went, including to my child’s school, and my two teaching workplaces.
  4. A supplement I had ordered by mail arrived at this time–somewhat tampered with, the box opened and the packaging rewrapped. Regardless, not suspecting anything, I took the supplement, and ended up with a horrific, immediate rash, and a sensation of being attacked internally by a crawling parasite, as well as, oddly, extreme sensitivity to heat and to electromagnetic fields–from the computer, wifi, etc. Healing lavender oils and aloe vera gel and detoxes finally ended the scourge in about 4-5 days, and a chance usage of a vacuum cleaner–with its oscillating EMFs–led to a completely bizarre phenomenon–microscopic, silvery silica-like particles literally flying out of my skin. I have not fully researched this, but what I have suggests that these are piezoelectric microchips designed to increase electromagnetic sensitivity and accentuate the wearer’s receptivity and transmissivity as a radio transceiver.
  5. Shortly thereafter, my whole family and I, sound sleepers all, were jointly woken up in the middle of the night by what we can only describe as waves of thermal, pulsed energy coming in through the window and invading our body in waves from the outside–not as an internal bodily phenomenon, but as an externally-applied phenomenon. This was before Thanksgiving.
  6. After Thanksgiving, the harassment by cars on our street appeared to increase. Fast-moving vehicles suddenly proliferated on our street. Cars emitting particularly noxious exhaust began to pass by our house and crowd in front of our car on roadways.
  7. A small plane began to fly frequently at low altitudes directly over my house and yard, often several times a day, this in seeming conjunction with signals from the cars parked on our street. I came to notice this plane seemed to mark my departures and arrivals back to the house; I also noticed this plane hovering outside a building every time I went somewhere, once I had arrived.
  8. One morning, early, I was woken again by waves of energy and what absolutely felt like a remote neural probe of my skull, lobe by lobe–I could distinctly feel each lobe in my brain with this probe–since I was just barely awake, I was literally unable to move at this time.
  9. Ever since that moment, I have physically felt continuously tracked, followed, and irradiated by electromagnetic pulses. 
  10. One more thing happened that fall. during the first week of December, on a walk to a local park in the daytime, when the park (covered with snow from a recent storm) was almost empty, a young woman accompanied by a German Shepherd, shot something at me from a distance–I did not realize what was happening until I heard an odd whistling sound by my ear and looked across at her–she was aiming something at me that she was attempting to conceal with her jacket. I left the park with my dog immediately. Initially I thought she had missed but later found a small laceration near my left ear, just possibly indicative of a radio-frequency tracking chip embedded subcutaneously. The stalking and radiation intensified after this incident.
  11. In retrospect, I realize now what she sharp-shot at me was a cochlear implant: an RFID that is lodged just below my left ear, because since then, I can feel the pull on it as it responds to radio signals generated by tracking devices–carried by c/overt operatives in grocery stores, clothes stores, the mailman, UPS drivers, planes–both inside and outside the home.
  12. Additionally, this past summer, third week of August 2015, on a public beach in Cape Cod, where we were surrounded by ostensible beach-goers, a second RFID chip was sharp-shot into my upper left arm. The laceration on my skin was noticed and remarked on by both families we were vacationing with. I later began to feel the same radio pulling sensations and pain signals as with the cochlear implant.
  13. However, I have also realized there are other implants and bio-MEMs on my body, in various places, as mapped online by others experiencing similar assaults–they tend to heat up, respond to external radio signals, and generate their own signals, especially internal and external heat signals, producing topical temperature rises which can be externally measured. I can only surmise I was implanted on my one hospital stay in Virginia Hospital Center, Arlington, in 2006, when I had to hit an emergency room following a sudden inexplicable pain in my right kidney area, which I literally felt was coming in through the window. (Knowing what I know now, I think I was hit by a covert operative in the neighborhood wielding a DEW.) In any case, I was on pain meds and antibiotics in the hospital for 2 nights, and had recurring health issues after that, including recurrent miscarriages–which was odd, since as an active, athletic vegan on a wonderful, organic diet, I was extremely healthy otherwise. (Again, in retrospect, I think those miscarriages were externally engineered–this was part of a covert assault that began in 2006, I was just not aware at the time.) I do recall also experiencing some stalking at that time.
  14. Today, I am literally tracked room to room in my house. While I am in my home, odd tracking sounds–like hits on the side of the house or hits on our heating system–can be heard from above, as if some kind of (satellite/antenna?drone?) tracking device is operating from the roof or above it, as I move from room to room.
  15. Tracked from outside/above: Strange cars congregate on our street, and as I move from room to room, these cars too move (at noticeable, audible speed), around the block or up the street or down the street, or right in front of our house. In addition, these cars appear to communicate by making particular honking sounds. They also appear to communicate with a small plane, which zooms over our house and yard immediately and puts a loud tracking sound against the nearest house wall in relation to my location.
  16. Irradiation–When I sit down lie down or am otherwise stationary, I am flooded with waves, pulses, and buzzes of radiation. (These are physically measurable–I have recorded these pulses and oscillations with an RF meter.) They cause immediate headaches, heat and pain in various body regions, extreme heat, disorientation, nausea, confusion, rashes, head smog, and.hair falling out.
  17. At night, the car or van or truck apparently trying to locate me would pump huge amounts of Extremely Low Frequencies into my house–this is highly damaging radiation, known to be injurious to human health. My daughter is nine and is subject to this radiation, as also my husband, our dog, and myself. This has become a 24/7 phenomenon–both in the daytime and at night. The loud sounds of the engine pumping ELFs at night is very audible–although in recent times this sound has been minimized. The microwave pulses that appear on my person too are audible and can be recorded.
  18. Early mornings and indeed at various times through the course of the day, the small plane flies over and hovers interminably over our house. During this time I have noted abrupt changes in my and my family’s health: a feeling of suffocation, sudden and sustained lung pain, or heart palpitation–all symptoms which disappear immediately if I move– or, as occurred once, and as I understood only in retrospect, my daughter’s sudden stomach ache, nausea, and diarrhea, not attributable to any other cause.
  19. The first week that all this happened, I lost 7 pounds in striving not to sit still or be stationary, I also suffered extreme sleep-deprivation through being buzzed electromagnetically all night and being forced to get up and walk around to avoid the constant signals on my body. I woke up from my terrible nights with my hair falling out, with extreme nausea and stomach aches, and extreme migraines and head smog.
  20. My first frantic attempts to research what was happening–regarding the stalking, the tracking, the irradiation–led me to the discovery of electromagnetic neuroweapons being used on civilians, to the terminology and phenomena of Covert Harassment, Organized Stalking, Electronic Harassment, and Targeted Individuals. My first attempts to shield myself led to use of felt hats and Mylar and aluminum foil and, that, combined with the sleep deprivation, caused my husband, my cousin and my sister, who is a doctor (an ophthalmologist), to immediately marshal me into chatting about insomnia with a family friend (Dr. Shubha Thiagarajan from New England Behavioral Health, Lawrence, Mass) who is a psychiatrist, and later also with someone (Ourania Madias, MD of Harvard Vanguard Medical Center, Quincy, Mass) who was presented to me most deceptively by my husband as a marital counselor but who turned out to be a child psychiatrist, both of whom assured me I was being influenced by websites and should just “stop reading so much.” Please note I visited the first doc purely for a sleeping pill, for insomnia, and the second supposedly to engage in marital counseling. The latter prescribed a drug she told me was a sedative (I had explained the sleep-deprivation, and I also ended up telling her about the tracking and irradiation, although I hadn’t intended to, I just tend to talk too much!) but which turned out to be, when I looked it up at home on my sister’s medical drug directory, a drug prescribed solely for schizoid-affective disorder, with, ironically, a side-effect being noted of insomnia. (I did not take any dose of this drug, once I found out–I’m just averse to drugs.) Upshot to all this: I suspect both of these docs labelled me as “schizoid” although I’d gone in to talk about insomnia. I later learned the family friend also had billed my visit as a “psychiatric diagnostic and evaluation” which I thence disputed, emphasizing to her the reason for my consultation being, as I had noted on her office form, insomnia, nothing more. However, true to the formula by which all neuroweapon-reporting individuals are dismissed and discredited as schizoid and paraniod, she neither researched the issue nor changed her billing status, choosing instead to stand by the disinformation and lies fed to her by organized psychiatry.
  21. I have to also mention that certain members of my daughter’s school community, when informed that I was experiencing “being covertly harassed and surveilled,” also reacted, with disbelief–and yet, that later on, now, as has everyone at the school, these very naysayers have fallen in completely with the local-fusion-center-directed activities of “concealed monitoring,” open surveillance, color-coding, active Psy-Ops, and noise harassment that I am surrounded by. These are people who are compromising their own principles out of fear, and falling in line apparently in order not to be targeted themselves.
  22. Concealed monitoring: Former friends, neighbors, and even some relatives engage in continuously tracking and neuroweapon-hitting via the covert methodology of concealed monitoring; which really it seems is being connected on their cells with a police/FBI/Intel voice/text network which may be AI-run, and running an app on their cells to point, GPS-track, and hit. (These direct radio pulses/pain signals from either satellites/ground vehicles nearby onto my nerves/muscles/organs, and one has to wonder how people could be conned into doing this to another human–it is most definitely Physical Assault (with Radiation.))
  23. Since the first weeks, I have learned how better to shield myself, and do not wake up anymore with sleep-deprivation and head smog and nausea and broken knees, as I once did. The attempts to sleep-deprive have not stopped however, and, in addition to bursts of extreme microwaved heat sent my way at key points during REM cycles at night, and helicopters flying low over my house at these times (no kidding, at midnight, for months, and at 2 am, 3:30 am, and again at 5:30 or 6 am–currently this helicopter flyover activity at distinct times at night has lessened, although not stopped), the whole phenomenon of 24/7 harassment with neuroweapons and tracking continues.
  24. On a daily basis, I experience the constant flickering of nerves from tracking neuroweapons, the burst of buzzy energy arriving at my person when I sit down–which most usually does not penetrate further now, thanks to adequate shielding–and neighbors engaging in color-coding and noise harassment when the speeding cars and circling planes fail to “lock on” to me with their ridiculous remote-control weapons, a fairly frequent occurrence. Today–Jan 3, 2016–for months now, I have been hit in the heart and chest area, in addition continually to the head, the face, lungs, liver, kidney, knees, hands.
  25. I lost both my art jobs at schools. Parents stopped enrolling their kids in my art and writing workshops–which had garnered wonderful reviews the first, untargeted year that they ran–and began to avoid me as if they had heard something awful about me. Teaching-job applications for college writing jobs were continuously sabotaged online. I currently teach 2-3 kids in my daytime workshops (they come to class color-coded, which tells me their families are also “in the network”), which I have decided to try to keep running, as best I can, while taking a break from college-job applications so I can research and write about this on my new blogs, The Everyday Concerned Citizen and Covert Assaults Satyagraha.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING MY EXPERIENCE

  1. There have been occasions where we suspect illegal covert break-ins into our house–carefully orchestrated when we are away from home, and–as can only be ascribed apparently to FBI-coordinated break-ins–leaving no trace of entry except for one or two personal items missing, including my RF meter, my eyeglasses from my bedside table, and visible damage done to our coffee table, an art table, and a pair of my boots. Houseplants too have been systematically destroyed, with some kind of drying poison applied selectively to branches and plants. Items left outside in our back yard–such as a birdfeeder, wind-chimes–have been seemingly deliberately destroyed, and plants in our backyard too poisoned selectively as described. Crocuses and tulips in the front yard have had petals and leaves snipped off with scissors–my husband (who nevertheless wants to stay in denial about all this) also witnessed this.
  2. During the first year of this assault, color-coded attire, and harassive actions–such as traffic and parking and walking cut-offs–became so noticeable at my daughter’s school, and from parents of kids taking my workshops, along with whispers and insinuations of “investigations” being opened on me and innuendo of a sexual nature, that it became obvious to me that true to book, I was being made the center of a vicious smear campaign by whatever agency is responsible; I felt compelled to research and share links with several parents and teachers on false FBI investigations (see Mike German’s videos on Youtube) being opened on activists, as well as links to information online on how “reporting individuals” are discredited, especially sections from Mark Rich’s book, New World Wars.
  3. On two trips to Chicago that first year, I noted many stalking incidents at both airports, and felt I was irradiated on the plane, both ways, going and returning to Boston: on the first trip, in both cases, a couple sat behind me with a suspect case pushed up against the back of my seat. On both trips as also on a recent Amtrak trip to New York, I noticed assiduous observers, both student-like and older, staring at me with the dedication of psychiatrists in labs. The past year, I have also experienced stalking and neuroweapon-hits while driving to and in Burlington, Vermont, at hotels and motels, and in Cape Cod, at a rental house. I have witnessed the men with heavy bags checking into rooms nearby as well. (In Burlington, one group was driving with Canadian license plates. On our street, Chinese families have moved in who seem to be engaged purely in this surveillance/weapon-wielding activity. I have also run into Israeli and Eastern European stalkers. All of this makes me suspect NWO and UN involvement.)

LACK OF RESPONSE I’VE EXPERIENCED

  • I have spoken by phone to assistants in both Senator Elizabeth Warren’s and Senator Ed Markey’s offices, who listened to my accounts and did not follow through in any way with any kind of assistance or interest in researching or addressing this phenomenon. Letters I have addressed directly to these Senators as well as to Tackey Chan have fallen into a void and not been responded to. Letters to Amnesty International at Boston have been unanswered. A visit and report left at ACLU, Massachusetts resulted in an acknowledgement of  what I was experiencing as “harassment” and a declaration that ACLU could not help individuals.
  • FOIA requests I filed (using FOIA request text from a website online) with the FBI, CIA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), and DSS (Defense Secret Services) resulted in form letters saying no records had been found and that they could not tell me if I was or was not under investigation–whatever that means.
  • FOIA requests I filed online at muckrock.com to the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and later to the Federal Aviation Administration regarding the peculiar and very specific and constant flights of very specific small planes and helicopters over my house and neighborhood–still available online–resulted in  no information being provided, and many excuses being made.
  • The Office of Human Research Protections, Dept of Health and Human Services, whom I contacted seeking answers and to complain, and to ask that my complaint be entered in the public record, informed me they could do nothing if there were violations of Informed Consent requirements in military or Air Force contracts. In fact, they informed me, many departments and federal agencies didn’t need Informed Consent, since they all had exceptions to the Common Rule. (If human subject experimentation is classified–major loophole–none of these agencies need to bother with Informed Consent–how is that for democracy.)
  • I registered complaints with the US Air Force, the Dept. of Defense Office of the Inspector General, and others. All of these have fallen into a void.
  • PEN-American, of which I am a member, did not respond after I wrote to them.
  • Journalists I have contacted have all disdained to acknowledge or cover–including Glenn Greenwald, Trevor Timm, Chris Hedges, John Pilger, and others.  (Some alternative media journalists are slowly starting to cover this phenomenon, I’m aware.)
  • My emails, I know, like my tweets and Facebook posts are being tampered with. My phones are tapped. My cell is constantly being manipulated. My websites are messed with frequently (particularly to change site view and social-media sharing numbers.)
  • I am still figuring out my best options here–suing the government hasn’t helped others; I am looking into Common Law actions currently. (Any advice? I’m open!)

So here I am in 2016: fiction writer, poet, activist, mother, ethical citizen activist, and teacher. Just for speaking out: I have become a subject of covert Air Force/CIA experimentation with classified EMF/scalar/sonic neuroweaponry, and a subject of malicious 24/7surveillance and harassment, as well as a subject of major slander in my neighborhood and community. (Now of course, my aim is to continue speaking out, and researching, and posting, and waking the world up, until this absolutely insane and illegitimate NWO program of harassment, surveillance, and experimentation is terminated. Not only that, the whole truth about what Electronic Warfare is and what “non-lethal” weapons or “anti-personnel” weapons are needs to be revealed; we need to ban these supremely deadly and invasive neuroweapons, worldwide.)

Bio: Ramola D’s short fiction collection Temporary Lives, (University of Massachusetts Press, 2009), was awarded the 2008 AWP Grace Paley Prize and was a finalist for the 2010 Library of Virginia Fiction award. Invisible Season, her first poetry collection, co-won the Washington Writers’ Publishing House award in 1998. Against the Conspiracy of Things, her second manuscript of poetry was a recent finalist for the 2013 Benjamin Saltman Prize, Red Hen Press. A Discovery/The Nation finalist, and five-time Pushcart Prize nominee, she is the recipient of a 2005 National Endowment for the Arts fellowship in poetry. Her fiction, poetry, essays, reviews, and writer-interviews have appeared in various journals and anthologies, including Kweli Journal, Kartika Review, Urban Confustions, Greensboro Review, Los Angeles Review, Short Review, Blackbird, Prairie Schooner, Agni, Green Mountains Review, Indiana Review, Writer’s Chronicle, Indian Express, and been reprinted in Best American Poetry 1994, Best American Fantasy 2007, Full Moon on K Street: Poems About Washington, DC, and Literal Latte’s The Anthology: Highlights from Fifteen Years of a Unique “Mind Stimulating” Literary Magazine. Her fiction was shortlisted under 100 Other Distinguished Stories in Best American Stories 2007, and included in the anthologies Enhanced Gravity: More Fiction by Washington DC Women Writers (Paycock Press, 2006), All About Skin: Short Fiction by Women Writers of Color (University of Wisconsin Press, 2011), and Extraordinary Rendition: (American) Writers on Palestine (Oregon Books, 2015).   Ramola holds an MFA from George Mason University and a BS in Physics and MBA from the University of Madras. She has most recently taught Creative Writing at The George Washington University and at The Writer’s Center, Bethesda. She is the founder and editor of Delphi Quarterly, an online journal for writer, poet, and filmmaker interviews. She currently lives in the Boston area with her husband and daughter, and runs art and creative writing workshops for children while working on a novel, short fiction, poetry, and children’s books.

Resources:

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • jadan

    Maybe Chris Carter will cover this in the new X-Files series? This is actually more interesting than alien abduction, since much of that, if not most of it, is an element of the Pentagon’s psychological operations. The failure of the public to demand transparency and accountability in government gives the malefactors a free hand. When viewed as a psy-op, 911 was the boldest and most successful conspiracy to redirect an entire society’s political will of any known or suspected false flag operation. Mind control at the individual level is part of social control, or mass mind control. Government, in particular, the Department of Defense, must be subjected to a relentless and unflinching audit. The budget for these “dirty tricks” is more than likely hidden in classified “national security” programs. A confrontation between a free people and the national security state has to occur. Some one, please tell me where I can find enough free people to make it happen!

  • DebL.

    One thing about her story doesn’t jibe: if she is this level of threat to the criminal psychopathic elites that they would do such things as she says, then why is she allowed on planes; that is, why is she not on the no-fly list?

    • Carl_Herman

      Really? And that one inclusion would, to you, make this testimony “jibe”? Given the documented history that this psychopathic torture and experimentation really does occur (see start of article), then we can conclude that this testimony is likely representative of actual current experimentations in control, torture, and surveillance.

      I think this person is a convenient target to experiment upon, and worth silencing to the elite because of her activism. Her purpose to the elite is not to keep off planes, but to test different weapons upon to monitor effectiveness.

      Unless, DebL., you see some reason that keeping her off planes makes sense.

      • adream

        I have a very similar experience to Ramola’s.

        The tool is like the computer chess game that could beat the winning master on the planet, every time. It’s a human defeat program. Has it arrived at a place of 100% invincability? I would posit that it has – anyone targeted knows this. The only thing that allows one to survive as a target is the human operator at the other end – they either haven’t decided you are allowed to live, die, or finish being tortured.

        It is my question if the ‘behavioral health’ (read operation paperclip) component of the torture is being managed through the NIH’s SAMHSA Trauma Informed Care Program, which permits the DOJ/DOD to met out ‘justice’ to those who are ‘mentally ill’ and come in contact with the law? (IE torture them.)

        In other words, have the methods of counter terrorism, phoenix program, MK Ultra been enabled to be used “medicallly” against dissidents and activists who present a threat to the narrative of the corporate think of our new global order? Placed under a heading of mental illness, the remedies need no legal basis if they are military. So that the police/military become the doctors and the doctors become the police/military? And the ‘community’ is partnered with and tasked with targeting who is ‘mentally ill’ and causing ‘trauma’ in the community? (ie Infraguard?)

        Find this and more in the second document below:

        Leading Change: A Plan for Samhsa’s Roles and Actions 2011-2014 (search ‘surveillance’)
        http://store.samhsa.gov/product/Leading-Change-A-Plan-for-SAMHSA-s-Roles-and-Actions-2011-2014/SMA11-4629

        2015-2018 Agenda: Change 2.0
        http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//PEP14-LEADCHANGE2/PEP14-LEADCHANGE2.pdf

        Not to fear monger, but there is much at stake here. In times of crisis, population control is key. The new capabilities of mind control, brain mapping, (Obama’s Brain Project), DNA, virtual reality of physical being coupled with integrated socially networked minds – leads me to the question – is The Matrix now a real possibility? Have we arrived? If so, the makings of a global holocaust are also present.

        The advantages are self-evident: retaining the brain trust of billions of people while removing their physical burdens on the planet’s resources and remaining populations. It couldn’t be more stark. And more overwhelming for ‘normal’ people to comprehend. It leaves one stunned, unable to move. But move we must, as the mechanism becomes more technologically driven and autonymous every moment we delay.

        You will never see the victims. You are not allowed to – the families are turned into manchurian candidates and cannot remember or know what you tell them about your trauma. It all comes from the mind control studies of the ’50’s-’70’s.

        • Carl_Herman

          Strongly stated, adream; thank you.

          The only way out that I see is public demand for arrests of obvious criminal leaders centering in war, money, and lies. Then we can have a chance to have willing minions turn on their masters, discover the extent of these crimes, and move forward in good-faith truthful cooperation.

    • StanCBurnitt

      Why is she allowed on planes? Are you expecting logical, rational behaviours on the part of people who delight in dishing out torture and murder? What’s wrong with you, American?

  • voiceofmillions

    Carl, Thank you for this tremendous effort on your part to acknowledge, recognize, and publicize the ongoing secretive and covert and unwarranted targeting, extreme surveillance, and assault with EMF/scalar/sonic weapons that thousands of Americans and others worldwide are experiencing.

    Just to let you know, apparently the publication of this article is causing some commotion on my street. A National Grid vehicle has parked itself on my neighbor’s driveway this morning, with a noisy generator running, pumping ELFs into the house, and iniitiating from outside the activation cycle on our furnace (on and on, non-stop, over and over) –I’ve currently switched off the furnace. I might have also expected some major car action up and down the street, but I have started to FOIA-request DHS contracts with each and every one of my neighbors on my block (Muckrock.com) and have noticed this week they’re cutting back somewhat on that. They have not stopped the remote accessing and irradiating though, and their little plane is back, circling and humming.

    They’re not giving up, apparently, and I do hope you will continue exposing them. I look forward to mass exposure on all fronts and open confrontation, challenge,and termination of these illicit, inhumane, absolutely egregious Covert Ops by our own government, against its citizens. I’ll continue covering as well, on my websites.

    Ramola D

    • I’m sad to read what’s happening to you, are you able to have those RFID chips removed?

    • FBIkidnappedME

      There’s a saying that evil triumphs when good men do nothing. The reason this goes on is because there are NO good men working for the U.S. government. I put up with sleep deprivations games daily, spied on in every room of the house with TV, radio, and internet searches completely customized by most likely the NSA. I haven’t had a conversation with anyone in my family or neighborhood who isn’t wearing an earpiece with some dipchit Federal agent telling them what to say. When I go out in public I’m immediately attacked by several HUNDRED people in an annoyance game run with military precision. They have wasted 10’s of millions of dollars over the last 8 years terrorizing me daily and why? Because I’m leaking “Sarah Palin’s dirty little secret” which proves Obama is a fraud and that 9/11 WAS A U.S. MILITARY FALSE FLAG OPERATION.

  • Carl_Herman

    From Elizabeth Coady saying her posting isn’t going through:

    Thank you Carl and especially Ramola for your extraordinary efforts to expose these hidden evils. Our government has turned on its own people and is turning previously (& presumably) law abiding citizens into accessories to murder. My once lovely community has been corrupted by government agents targeting me for extrajudicial punishment. Neighbors whom I looked out for, remembered at Christmastime, and whose children I thought of while shopping have joined the covert campaign against me for fun and profit. They appear to have been plied with Cubs & Blackhawks tickets, home upgrades, babysitting, dog walking, home cleanings as well as cash. ‘We’re going to get you,’ slithered the condo president, a man who has no personal knowledge or social contact with me save what he’s been told by government spooks and law enforcement. I have audio recorded the former treasurer trespassing in my unit and a complaint to board went ignored. I have been and continue to be bombarded with radiation from alternating currents created w/a mobile oscillator. The unit next door has been in the hands of Fannie Mae since the summer of 2012, purchased outright at auction in December 2014 and remaining off the market. Three county sheriffs’ cars pulled up two weeks ago to perform a miniature psyops, pretending to empty the unit occupied for 18 months by a government contractor who would crawl through the floorboards and hit me with direct energy weapons. I have repeated asked the condo association to investigate my complaints, requests that have fallen on deaf ears. Yet I did receive a letter from the association’s attorney threatening ‘aggressive’ legal action if I complained to board again about being burned. Never mind its legal obligation to protect me as a unit owner. America is in dire trouble if these Nazi-like abuses are allowed to continue. And despite contacting dozens of reporters with of high and low profile, none have moved to investigate. Lawyers too have failed me as well as thousands of other targets. There’s a big chill over our collective conscience that Is paralyzing us and preventing us from reclaiming our country back from the psychopaths. I beseech lawyers, physicians and journalists to shake themselves awake to see our country is in the death throes of Democracy and to act to reverse this course now. Targeted individuals need you all to remove the devices from their bodies that make them virtual lab rats, to expose these unfathomable breeches of humanity, and to help them seek justice in from our courts. Anybody? If you are a doctor, journalist or lawyer who will help me please reach out to Carl who will get you in touch with me. Elizabeth Coady

  • Carl_Herman
  • nomadfiles

    Two words: Miriam Carey.

  • elizabethhanson

    Our 30 websites have been under severe attack with one taken down. Our topics cover navy jets flying offensive growler jets on the Olympic Penninsula, tax reform, public school funding, opposing common core and its tests and promoting GED fairness…. (which we seem to have won in part, as Pearson lowered the # you need to earn to pass a test- due to many of us sounding the alarm and market share being lost in Texas, Colorado and California.) The attacks are coordinated and fierce. Our webhost in Canada says that lots of people’s websites are under attack…Ramona’s letter portends things to come for those of us who speak out I fear. Fear isn’t exactly the right word I have right now. Anger comes closer, and shock… yet what to do? I salute you Ramola for your bravery. Carl, has Washingtonsblog been under attack? I bet it has. The attacks have intensified since November. My husband is doing protective measures to combat this and likely will write a book about it.
    If people aren’t allowed to voice dissent to what is going on in this nation? Do we have freedom?

    • obidiah_slope

      Only in your dreams.

    • Purselady

      I am experiencing these exact symptoms and it escalated after a run in with VA Hospital Center. They have done so many cruel things to terrorize and embarrass my daughter and myself. No we do not have the freedom to object to the government. I pray and they laugh at that!

      • Paul Chach Mcarthy

        What really irks them is if you are able to maintain your sense of humour, try to laugh at them. I know its difficult. But remember, they are every bit as scared of you as you are of them, that’s why they are so vehemently pursuing you.

  • farmer_luke

    There are so many ridiculous claims, that could have been presented with some kind of evidence, that I thought this was going to be a funny spoof of some kind. Ramola sounds very paranoid. I don’t mean to antagonize Ramola in her condition. It sound like she really does need help. If her own husband is “in denial” about what’s happening to her; he has seen all the evidence that was left out of this article, how can we believe the outlandish, unsupported claims made by Ramola?

    • Carl_Herman

      farmer: it’s you who fail to present evidence that the testimony is somehow “ridiculous.” But go ahead and surprise us: you made a claim that requires a burden of proof. This means that to substantiate your claim of “ridiculous” you have to have some command on this subject, like at least reading the resources Ramola provides, and then take her testimony with evidence to show it is what you claim.

      But you won’t even try to do that, will you farmer?

      The category of your testimony is called “denial.” Those of us responsive to professional levels of evidence dismiss your type of comment immediately unless you can back it up.

      Ramola is also providing testimony. This is a category of evidence that honest people will listen to and consider. Most of what we say daily is testimony. You are free to accept or reject it, farmer, but call it ridiculous? Unless you have evidence for what you say, perhaps it is someone else being ridiculous other than Ramola.

      • farmer_luke

        Carl, my only expertise regarding this subject is common sense.

        “ I mention this because subsequent behavior–guilty looks and evasiveness–from the
        School Board President (Alexander Steffan) indicated to me that he was possibly the person involved–in a vindictive act of retaliation and petty malice–in giving my name, or selling my name, as a paid NSA/DHS/FBI informant”

        The president of the school board is working for the FBI/NSA/DHS because he wanted to avoid confrontation with a crazy lady making a fuss about babysitting costs?

        “A disproportionate number of strange cars, vans, SUVs, trucks, utility vehicles began to roar into our normally quiet street and park around and near our house, during the daytime and the night.”

        Why would these nefarious, covert agents “roar” around attracting attention? Does
        she have videos showing this influx of strange cars?

        “microscopic, silvery silica-like particles literally flying out of my skin.”

        Any pictures/video evidence?

        “A small plane began to fly frequently at low altitudes directly over my house and yard, often several times a day, this in seeming conjunction with signals from the cars parked on our street. I came to notice this plane seemed to mark my departures and arrivals back to the house; I also noticed this plane hovering outside a building every time I went somewhere, once I had arrived.”

        What kind of signals were the parked cars giving the plane? How does a plane hover? Most planes I know about don’t have that ability. Any videos of this amazing hovering plane at her home or every building she goes to?

        “Ever since that moment, I have physically felt continuously tracked, followed, and
        irradiated by electromagnetic pulses.”

        I don’t doubt she “feels” that way. I do doubt that feeling is based on reality.

        “Initially I thought she had missed but later found a small laceration near my left ear, just possibly indicative of a radio-frequency tracking chip embedded subcutaneously.”

        Many things are possible. Is that the most likely explanation?

        “…a second RFID chip was sharp-shot into my upper left arm. The laceration on my skin was noticed and remarked on by both families we were vacationing with. I later began to feel the same radio pulling sensations and pain signals as with the cochlear implant.”

        Did anyone see the sharp shooter? Or did a scratch, from unknown origin, automatically mean someone’s out to get her?

        “I can only surmise I was implanted on my one hospital stay in Virginia Hospital
        Center, Arlington, in 2006, when I had to hit an emergency room following a sudden inexplicable pain in my right kidney area, which I literally felt was coming in through the window.”

        This one just totally confuses me. What is coming through the window, the kidney
        pain which was the cause of her coming to the E.R. or the implant? Neither makes sense.

        “Today, I am literally tracked room to room in my house. While I am in my home, odd tracking sounds–like hits on the side of the house or hits on our heating system–can be heard from above, as if some kind of (satellite/antenna?drone?) tracking device is operating from the roof or above it, as I move from room to room.”

        Seriously, with their sophistication they’re banging into the walls and duct-work of
        her house trying to track her from room to room? Everyone’s place makes unknown noises.

        “Tracked from outside/above: Strange cars congregate on our street, and as I move
        from room to room, these cars too move (at noticeable, audible speed), around the block or up the street or down the street, or right in front of our house. In addition, these cars appear to communicate by making particular honking sounds. They also appear to communicate with a small plane, which zooms over our house and yard
        immediately and puts a loud tracking sound against the nearest house wall in relation to my location.”

        So cars go up and down the street in direct relationship to where she goes in her
        house. That is utterly ridiculous. What purpose might that serve and how hard would it be to prove this? Set up a camera watching the street and move from room to room in a pattern and show the “strange” cars moving in response. Repeat as many times as necessary to remove all doubt.

        “At night, the car or van or truck apparently trying to locate me would pump huge amounts of Extremely Low Frequencies into my house–this is highly damaging radiation, known to be injurious to human health. My daughter is nine and is subject to this radiation, as also my husband, our dog, and myself. This has become a 24/7 phenomenon”

        How are they pumping these ELFs into her house? Where’s the proof?

        “…or, as occurred once, and as I understood only in retrospect, my daughter’s sudden stomach ache, nausea, and diarrhea, not attributable to any other cause.”

        Because there is no cause for a sudden, upset stomach.

        I guess that’s probably enough to show how/why I view Ramola’s claims to be ridiculous and without evidence.

        I don’t doubt she is suffering. I do think, like the psychiatrists she saw, that it is much more likely she is suffering from a form of paranoia/schizophrenia than everyone being out to get her.

        • Carl_Herman

          Ok, and you didn’t read any of her reference work, or anyone else’s, right?

          You’re projecting from what you know, and not from anything you’ve researched on this topic from others who have done homework. With all respect and honesty: you don’t know what you’re talking about without exploring the research.

          • voiceofmillions

            Carl, Thank you for your awareness and commitment to the truth. It’s interesting how dedicated “farmer_luke” is to dismissively naming me paranoid/schizophrenic, much in the style of state-serving psychiatrists–in the avid service of our “classified research” Mil/Intel/private industry–and offer condolences for my “suffering” while completely failing to evince any awareness of what is going on today regarding EMF weapons, Electronic Warfare, Non-Lethal Weapons, Neuroweapons, Directed Energy Bio-Behavioral Research, Neuro-Implants, RFID chips, Remote Neural Monitoring, Neuro Warfare research from DARPA, and more.

            Which does underline the situation that those who are being assaulted covertly in this fashion continually face: the distinct and overt attempt — by the covert Mil/Intel/academic cartel running this evil –to label all reporting individuals insane and paranoid, in attempts to keep the experimentation and assault hidden from larger view. A historic ruse (see Eileen Welsome’s Plutonium Files), to silence the witness of involuntary/non-consensual assaultees/experimentees.

            State of the Nation recently ran an article which included Neuro-experimentation by DARPA, information on patents, and listed many research contracts: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=29475#more-29475

            Dr. Robert Duncan’s book Project Soulcatcher details many aspects of CIA research in Electronic Brain Links, weaponized neuropsychology, cybernetic mind control.

            Renee Pittman Mitchell’s book Remote Brain Targeting also lists and describes patents and includes testimony and articles from scientists who have worked on these technologies, including Dr. Richard Alan Miller.

            Dr. Nick Begich’s many investigative-reporting books, in particular the deeply-researched book, Controlling the Human Mind/Technologies for Political Control, present the state of ongoing research in this area, and also highlight the opportunities for abuse in documented DoD/DoJ Memoranda of Understanding permitting the covert use of remote radiation neuroweaponry on citizens in undisclosed programs of “Threat Surveillance,” “Pre-Crime,” “Concealed Monitoring,” “Concealed Electronic Surveillance,” and other such, which I have explored, with documentation, in articles posted at my site The Everyday Concerned Citizen (many linked with my letter at your site.)

            There are many other books of investigative research on this subject, including Mark Rich’s book, New World Wars. Youtube videos from many scientists and physicists, including Dr. Rauni Lukenen Kilde, Dr. Leuren Moret, and Dr. Barrie Trower, and informative talks by many investigators and scientists at the Covert Harassment Conference in Berlin, 2015 might help inform farmer_luke as to what exactly this remote neurotechnology is, and how it is being used covertly today on citizens, globally, as means of political control.

            My testimony as many may know is by no means unique. Thousands are reporting these atrocities and assaults, worldwide.

            Finally, as a writer who once spent a year working at SCARF, The Schizophrenic Foundation of India, researching, investigating, and writing extensively on schizophrenia, I’d like to inform farmer_luke that anyone who is “suffering from a form of paranoia/schizophrenia” is scarcely likely to be a fully-functioning, highly-productive, intellectually-engaged, critically-thinking, contributing member of society as I most certainly am, and continue to be.

            I thank all the commenters here who can see that the USA has fallen into a black hole today and can recognize the depth of the repression and oppression that is being leveled against us. Neuroweapons, remote access of the human brain and body, electronic warfare and cyborg-izing experimentation: these are deadly realities today being leveled against our humanity. Speaking openly about them is possibly a first step to exposing their horrors and ensuring their termination.

          • Carl_Herman

            Strong, Ramola; thank you.

            The US .01% attack the public in literally ~100 ways, and will only continue until they are lawfully stopped for obvious criminal acts centering in war (and weapons of all kinds), money, and lies. The public must demand arrests for the most obvious crimes in Wars of Aggression, then we’ll have a chance for willing minions to reveal the extent of the massive crimes waged on the public.

            Until Americans have enough intellectual integrity and moral courage to see and stand for justice, we’ll have only more attacks, pain, and suffering.

          • voiceofmillions

            I encourage anyone reading the paranoia-focused comments here by “farmer_luke” to take a look at (Controlled-Media) Wikipedia’s 12 Steps of Perception Management–employed ardently in current times by our dedicated cyber-warfare trolls acting on behalf of various military and Intel groups, and deconstructed in State of The Nation’s article on False Flags as Legal Propaganda–Impression Management is one of them–http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=29475#more-29475

            Also, this site covering Psychiatric Reprisal and 20/20 Barbara Walters/Sam Donaldson coverage of two US military whistleblowers who were labelled “paranoid” primarily to discount their testimony and charges of internal corruption and fraud–http://www.gang-stalking.com/psychiatric-reprisal/4584075029 –and traces the bringing home to the US the horrific Soviet practice of throwing activists, dissidents, anyone they liked into psychiatric institutions, with the help of State-serving psychiatrists.

            The “program” of dismissing the testimony of those who are targeted today by our corrupt Deep State involves discrediting the witness as paranoid. To this end, an elaborate system of Psy Ops is constructed around the individual, with the aim being: psychiatric diagnosis of paranoia, as soon as the individual so much as mentions or reports the Psy Ops. Other astute observers note that these Psy Ops — which involve fraudulent Intel “notifications of investigations” and rolling communities into networks in order to robotize them into engaging in directed actions, such as wearing certain colors, expressing certain memes, engaging in noise harassment, etc. — have been contrived primarily to get the targeted individual to notice them, talk about them, report and recount, just so a psychiatrist can come along and whip out his DSM (the force behind Wikipedia?) and say, Ah yes, Most definitely, That is Paranoia. Case Closed. Shut the target up. Throw her in Mental Jail. Put the word out, closely align Paranoia with her name.

            There is no other game they’ve got–this is the game, and “farmer_luke” as you can tell, is playing it with all he’s got.

            It’s called Perception Management. From the State of the Nation article mentioned above: “Perception management is a term originated by the US Department of Defense. It defines it as: “Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence
            their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to
            intelligence systems and leaders at all to influence official estimates,
            ultimately resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions
            favorable to the originator’s objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.” Also: “The DoD has identified the information domain as its new “asymmetric flank.” The level of use of perception management is continuing to grow throughout the military. There are now specialists, known as psychological operations officers and civil affairs officers, whose only purpose is to decide how to present information/propaganda to the media and to the people of the current country.”

            Writers notice and observe and report in close detail–we who read understand this as a sign of awareness. Not paranoia–which would involve fear. (Perhaps “farmer_luke” will tell us about a fourth aunt, the fearless paranoid now.) As for intelligent, functioning paranoids, mention of which seems to defy the concept of schizos/phrenos as “split from reality”, I do so love aunt stories. I have uncle stories too, to pass around. One involves the Joint Doctrine of Military Deception, the second involves the Deny/Dismiss/Degrade/Disrupt/Discredit brigade from the NSA, and the third (they’re all brothers) the official Disinformation Campaigns of the CIA.

            Of these, Victor Marchetti writes, “The real reason for the official secrecy, in most instances, is not to
            keep the opposition (the CIA’s euphemistic term for the enemy) from
            knowing what is going on; the enemy usually does know. The basic reason
            for governmental secrecy is to keep you, the American public, from
            knowing — for you, too, are considered the opposition, or enemy —
            so that you cannot interfere. When the public does not know what the
            government or the CIA is doing, it cannot voice its approval or
            disapproval of their actions. In fact, they can even lie to you about
            what they are doing or have done, and you will not know it.”

            Unlike “farmer_luke”‘s aunts, all these uncles exhibit comparably extreme symptoms of Deception, Disinformation, Delusion, and Discrediting All the time, and I probably don’t have to point out, that pretty much the whole world knows it by now.

          • lior matatov

            I have to also mention that certain members of my daughter’s school community, when informed that I was experiencing “being covertly harassed and surveilled,” also reacted, with disbelief–and yet, that later on, now, as has everyone at the school, these very naysayers have fallen in completely with the local-fusion-center-directed activities of “concealed monitoring,” open surveillance, color-coding, active Psy-Ops, and noise harassment that I am surrounded by. These are people who are compromising their own principles out of fear, and falling in line apparently in order not to be targeted themselves.

            Be her neighbour… The technology is 49 years old, it airplane invention compare to Balloon (aeronautics) what science have now. http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

            They so advanced they see us as animals. They murderers.

            Such Things are Known

            Dorothy Burdick, New York: Vantage Press Inc., 1982

            All these things are known to government psychiatrists and psychologists. The government in question is the government of the United States of America. The events I recount began on a May weekend in 1978. …

          • reba

            As a targeted individual, all of this is quite familiar to me..as for the nay sayers..they are either perps or the idea of this is so frightening their weak personality must deny it altogether…either way, it is fruitless to argue with them…I pray for the violated and the violators. The latter are in most need of it..may God have mercy on their souls. If you are a perp reading this, it’s not too late for you to return to God and do what is right…

          • farmer_luke

            I appreciate the above comment. It seems to me to rational and logically presented (maybe other than your comment about how dedicated I am in attacking you).

            Regarding schizophrenia, I found the following on Wikipedia about the paranoid subtype: “Paranoid type:
            Delusions or auditory hallucinations are present, but thought disorder,
            disorganized behavior, or affective flattening are not. Delusions are
            persecutory and/or grandiose…”

          • Carl_Herman

            So, why haven’t you done any homework with the resources Ramola has offered, or presented others that you’ve researched?

            farmer_luke: the only appreciation I have for your comment is to show what one looks like with unsubstantiated claims. You literally have no idea what you’re talking about with any study in this area.

            And then, you go forward with another attack on Ramola to call her paranoid schizophrenic while denying your dedication to attack her???

            Thank you for offering the choice of which testimony seems more credible: Ramola’s with included resources, or yours without any substantiation and ending with name-calling. This is kind of our whole challenge represented in this comparison.

          • farmer_luke

            Sorry Carl, I wasn’t very clear. I appreciated the presentation of references/resources in the comment.

            I have been doing some “homework” with the resources Ramola offered.

            I wasn’t attacking Ramola with the quote from Wikipedia. It was in reply to her saying, “that anyone who is ‘suffering from a form of paranoia/schizophrenia’ is
            scarcely likely to be a fully-functioning, highly-productive,
            intellectually-engaged, critically-thinking, contributing member of
            society”.
            The quote indicated to me that the paranoid subtype of schizophrenics don’t have many of the mental limitations that schizophrenics in general are characterized as having. Ramola’s comment said you can’t be schizophrenic and mentally with it. I thought the Wikipedia quote said otherwise.

          • Carl_Herman

            Ok; and have you ever encountered such a person of irrational paranoia in your life of considering literally tens of thousands of humans?

            I haven’t. Maybe you should complete your homework before you even suggest the possibility that the testimony should be attacked and dismissed. Right?

            Again: we live in a world where the .01% use such tactics to engage the thoughtless into illegal and lie-started Wars of Aggression, continue poverty that kills a million people every month for ongoing quest of empire, and sink humanity into debt and servitude by stating that debt is “money” and good for us.

            The choice is to discern fact from spin. Choose wisely; you’ll have the future of your actions.

          • farmer_luke

            I have two aunts who are somewhat paranoid. A third aunt (all sisters) has a son who has been diagnosed with schizophrenia and has spent most of his adult life institutionalized. One of the aunts is paranoid about small things; someone has taken her keys or stolen things or messed with her phone. The other aunt, who is more intellectual, has paranoia on a grander scale. She is still capable of functioning socially and manages several rental properties among other things, but is definitely out of touch with reality. My aunt’s paranoia isn’t as extreme as Ramola’s, but yes, I do have personal experience with someone who is intelligent, functioning, and paranoid.

            “The choice is to discern fact from spin. Choose wisely; you’ll have the future of your actions.”
            I agree wholeheartedly.

          • Carl_Herman

            So you still accuse Ramola of paranoia without reporting on research. We see.

            I’m done responding to you.

          • farmer_luke

            Thanks for your concluding remarks. Here are mine.

            “now, as has everyone at the school, these very naysayers have fallen in
            completely with the local-fusion-center-directed activities of
            “concealed monitoring,” open surveillance, color-coding, active Psy-Ops,
            and noise harassment that I am surrounded by.”

            Is it more likely that EVERYONE at the school is secretly targeting Ramola or that Ramola is imagining things?

          • Carl_Herman

            Still no research, farmer? Just bullshitting that you would, right? Hey, a related topic: you agree US current wars aren’t even close to lawful, or am I paranoid about this?

            And I’ve got a quote for you from another person targeted by government. You’ll complain about it, though, as irrelevant:

            “… I have no expectation of approval from the vulgar and no wide audience of readers. Rather, I am an author to none who read these things but those who seriously meditate with me, who have the ability and the desire to withdraw their mind from the senses and at the same time from all prejudices. Such people I know all too well to be few and far between. As to those who do not take care to comprehend the order and series of my reasons but eagerly dispute over single conclusions by themselves, as is the custom for many-those, I say, will derive little benefit from a reading of this treatise; and although perhaps they might find an occasion for quibbling in many spots, still it is not an easy matter for them to raise an objection that is either compelling or worthy of response.”

            – Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 1641, “Preface to the Reader.” Descartes is considered the founder of modern philosophy, the founder of analytical geometry (which led to calculus), and a founder of the Scientific Revolution. Descartes was well-known in his age, but highly controversial. His work was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633, and his books put on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1663. The University of Utrecht condemned his work in 1643, where he had previously taught.

          • farmer_luke

            My premise throughout these comments has simply been that Ramola’s “testimony” presented above has many ridiculous claims not supported by evidence. I gave specific examples of claims I think are ridiculous and explained why. I have never made any statement of belief for or against the various types of targeting Ramola describes.

          • Carl_Herman

            And my premise is that without you doing any research that we’ve invited you to do all along these comments is that you literally have no idea what you’re talking about (or you are a disinformation agent). What you gave were specific examples of areas that your non-researched opinion rejected.

            Your offended opinions meet zero professional and academic standards for supporting any factual claim. Because you insist on speaking without any consideration of the history on this topic, all you offer are unsubstantiated opinions. As you may know, if we were having a professional discussion, you would be asked to leave until you have some factual basis to speak. What you state is literally as stupid as, “heavier than air flight except for birds is impossible” in a discussion of aircraft.

            And you admit such technology may exist, yet won’t therefore simply do what professionals do with such testimony: hear the person out. If you were interested at all in this topic, farmer, you would then match the testimony to available facts about such technologies!

            But all you want to do is deny such testimony could be credible, just as a non-educated person would 100 years ago about airplanes being able to fly.

          • Carl_Herman

            Or how about this, assuming you’re an actual farmer discussing crop yields and I show up to interrupt without knowing anything about agriculture. I say something like, “Wait, what? It’s obviously ridiculous that a plant can grow from a seed. And how does this ‘plant’ eat without a mouth? You’re making this up.”

            Of course, anyone could verify the topic’s facts with research. And of course, without research (like you, farmer), one’s comments are what’s ridiculous.

          • farmer_luke

            Again, the person denying the plant growing from a seed would be roughly equivalent to someone denying Ramola’s claims because they deny the practices/technologies.

          • farmer_luke

            The difference is I’m not denying the technology/practices. I’m not denying the airplane in your analogy. If someone, 100 years ago, would have said, “I hear noises in the sky so I know airplanes are flying up there (and they’re out to get me).” I would say that’s ridiculous. It may well be true that airplanes are flying and it may well be true that these technologies Ramola is talking about exist but the testimony given doesn’t square with reality.

          • Target

            Farmer, why don’t you come clean and admit you are a paid propagandist for the state.

          • farmer_luke

            I have no response to that.

          • Target

            You mean you can neither confirm nor deny?

          • StanCBurnitt

            I have photographic and video evidence of serial stalking, and even pictures of a hastily shut down police station in San Jose, CA at 12pm on Sept. 26, 2015, when I showed up to report very serious crimes (with said evidence in hand). But your country is not a nation of laws, and it’s justice system is a bad joke.

            Farmer, you are a typical representative of the Land of Ridiculous Claims, the most ignorant and frightened of all the so called developed societies. Any country engaged in perpetual war is also engaged in perpetual torture of dissidents, no exceptions, except in the your head (if one is unwise enough to take anything you post here at face value).

            The US tortures people in the old DDR’s covert Stasi Zersetzung style because it’s a free country worried about image, which has taken quite a hit, along with your own.

            Carl Herman wasted his time with you, as have I. And that’s why you are here, right? To waste other people’s time. Job well done.

          • farmer_luke

            Yes, Stan, I’ve been hard at it not posting comments here for a month in order to waste as many people’s time as possible. I see my strategy is working brilliantly.

          • Ricardo Camilo Lopez

            farmer_luke: Regarding schizophrenia, I found the following on Wikipedia …

      • Paul Chach Mcarthy

        Dont get dragged into arguments with people like this. They are also being co-opted to drain your time and energy.

  • Ricardo Camilo Lopez

    // __ Pentagon Wants Psychologists to End Ban on Interrogation Role, by JAMES RISENJAN. 24, 2016
    ~
    nytimes.com/2016/01/25/us/politics/pentagon-wants-psychologists-to-end-ban-on-interrogation-role.html
    ~
    // __ RELATED COVERAGE: Psychologists Approve Ban on Role in National Security Interrogations
    ~
    nytimes.com/2015/08/08/us/politics/psychologists-approve-ban-on-role-in-national-security-interrogations.html
    ~
    RCL

  • RFID chips might be more common, in the link an article that suggest they’re often part of tooth fillings.

    http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/

    Course, they’re carried around in wallets.

    • quietone

      Yup. That’s how they snuck it in.

  • Delia Labarre

    When I was interviewed by an FBI agent a few years ago due to my pro-Palestinian activism, I happened to mention to him his agency’s involvement in these programs. He didn’t deny it, instead asked me what country in the world didn’t violate human rights. Thank you for exposing this horrendous, sadistic system of retaliation and experimentation on civilians. The cruelest of it is that the targets have to figure out on their own what is happening to them, and are more times than not surrounded by people who don’t believe them. I’ve read enough to know that it’s very real, and that we’d better all care, because they’re eventually coming for all of us, to manipulate and control, to rob us of what makes us individual humans with free will. Unfortunately, it’s not science fiction.

    • Carl_Herman

      Well stated, Delia; thank you. Yes, a fundamental choice is whether we love/care each other enough to demand lawful arrests to STOP obvious harmful and criminal acts.

    • Ricardo Camilo López

      “what country in the world didn’t violate human rights?”

      there are two interesting aspects relating to that “honest” statement:

      1) gringos have always denied “freedom lovers” do such things …

      2) the sophistication of the harassment and persecution by USG (already the country with the highest incarceration rate) has made the techniques of the stasi’s look like child play

      RCL

    • StanCBurnitt

      “The cruelest of it is that the targets have to figure out on their own what is happening to them, and are more times than not surrounded by people who don’t believe them.”

      I know exactly what you mean. Those people who didn’t believe you are almost as guilty as the perpetrators themselves. They pay for your torture, voted for it, and they will vote it’s continuation again in November.

      A certain type of people who would also express disbelief can be blood relatives, in my case: mother, older brother (deceased), brother-in-law, and sister — terrorist cowards hiding all their lives in all-white enclaves near Austin — who delivered carefully coached and staged death threats when I confronted them, without a gun or any violent intent, in 2008. These threats were followed up by USAF goons (friends of brother-in-law ‘Iraq War Hero’, or more accurately, War Criminal) who stalked me from Austin to Dulles airport on my way home to Brazil.

      An unpleasant aspect of the experience is finding out many of people around you do believe you because they are participants. I spent three years (2012-2015) working in a Chinese owned Telecom in San Jose, CA, and the American dominated security guard, marketing, and human resources departments were involved in constant harassment activities inside the workplace. Towards the end, their tactics became increasingly childish and violent at the same time, as a reaction to a vociferous confrontation with their serial stalker in chief — the head of the security guards, a certain Mr. H. Lee Ness. The Chinese management chalked it up to a “local problem”.

      I do hope to live and see the day these people get the punishment they deserve. It does happen now and then, as history shows. The US is just another place full of people… nothing exceptional at all about them. They will eventually be subject to the same reactions other criminals have suffered in other times and places.

      Don’t give up. It’s one of their main objectives.

  • HM

    Carl

    I want to thank u for exposing this topic of electronic harassment. I have very similar story as Ramola
    i have been targeted individual for over 4 years now. I have hours of video that will reveal burn markings from the DEW all over my body. I am victim of electromagnetic radiation 24/7. I feel like i am having a heart attack multiple times throughout the day.
    I have been labeled as a enemy of the state by the NSA CIA and United State government put in program known as Zersetzung and filed in the FBI criminal index Berufsverbot. This shadow government is using taxpayer dollars to pay my neighbors to invade my families privacy. The reason for my harassment is i am exposing the CIA FBI mk ultra program. Please contact me
    god bless

  • Anonymous

    Here’s another resource to add to this page. It’s from the Covert Harassment Conference 2015 held in Berlin, Germany, on 1-2 October:

    https://www.covertharassmentconference.com/speaker?John_Hall

    The home page is:

    https://www.covertharassmentconference.com/home

  • lior matatov

    The neigbours are murdurers. In israel I know no one with involveent of neighbours and I read all info exist in Israel. So the number is one per million – or one per 200,000. Aaron alexis cases will happen every week in USA if it was not one per milion. They try to murdur me more then decade and wont stop until die.You don’t know the humuiliation of humiliate in front neighbours all day 365 days a years, They use most humulkiate weapon – cook you all body 247 show neighbours they read your thoughts and horrible things they do to you – they put robots do scary noises 247 some of them addition to hallucinations of monster talking – from the walls next to you and you cant do anything to protect yourself. The neighbours know they murdur you and keep do it you move other city they enter all neighbours again. You see people together as anmilas who hunt and eat their victim humiliate you by order they get from inside their rooms where they live as animal get from her hole – they do it together as animals, they see I live aline and hunt me as animals. They get money for this they will call police every once time I call them to stop from my room, because they aslked to and follow orders.

    They cook akk my body it is so painfull, And AI talking each second replicate within Ms each thought and feeling and HOW I think the thoughts in the exact voice from my Own mind and answer and let me hear the thought and humiliation about the thought 247.

    Poice never answer me no one answer me.

    It is mossad work and worldwide agents kill citizens.

    This is comparablr to hitler nazis holocoust see such neighbours you can uunderstand monsters people in holocoust.

    They also want to make you leave yo place you live by try to kill you and call police the tiny thing you say against them – as in holocosut they both try make you leave and kill you.

    The more they see they jave power the more cruel and murderers they are.
    Since I l;ive alone with no anyone in my house they crasy and fanatics in involvement of neighbours.

    In workplace many peolpe humilate you non stop.

    IN such low numbers of victims they can do anything even aaron alecxis case not interest FBI on their site they say it is conspiracy theory, they need alexis cases each month to make it stop.

    If I could I will kill my self with poison get help from dignitas organisation such decade of stay alive is too much for me and I zombie in my flat and they keep try to kill me.

    I live from pension which is not left money to anyithng, not CCTV camera, regulart camera snartphone and even stillls pictutrs.

    I can’t document them becauswe of lack of resources.

    There are not enough sadistics and resdources do it more then one per 200000 so They need pay nme as forst prize in lottary to make it justice and rqual, as they murdur me and make me disable.

    They try to murdur me 18 years. I know a single case in ISrael, only cooking body 247 no boices and neighbuors stay allive 28 years – since 1988 so cruel, they can;’t murdur you so they make you complete disable 28 years this as kill you alive.

    Truly I wait for death I don’t think there will be happy end and feel sorry for my self I can’t finish all of this becuese for kill my self I need take violent action which no one nknow how it end.

    What ramola said almost anyone turn their backs and humiliate her is what happen to me

    They in 2009-2010 put my thoughsts on speaker as mediavel age punnishment before my flat inj 4 floors people hear my thoght no one try help ointervene criminlas kill me and do whatever they can do to kill me this way.

    We are truly as jewish from the holocoust.

    http://www.yadvashem.org/

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    They are murderers !

  • lior matatov

    http://www.stopeg.com/

    All true. Worldwide.

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER

    Gang stalking, often accompanied by electronic harassment/electronic torture, is used to cause the physical or mental death of the target. The target is driven insane and commits suicide, collapses into a psychiatric patient, commits a (constructed) crime. This is called premeditated murder, and the ones participating are murderers. Gang stalking is also called organized stalking but it is better to call it organized murder.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(17) – Gang stalkers and people cookers are murderers, the crimes they commit belong to the worst crimes in history

    A very limited list of gang stalking a.k.a. organized stalking methods:

    – Sleep deprivation day-by-day, social isolation

    – Always surrounded, never alone, no privacy

    – Neighbor stalking, rude behaviour from random people

    – Workplace mobbing, breaking friendships

    – Character assasination, rumours spread

    – Feedback about conversations nobody can know

    – Honking horn, shoving chairs, bouncing ball, shoes with high heels

    – Receive phone calls, emails (popup/sound), SMSs at specific moments

    – Pidgeon cooing, crow screaming, dog barking on/off

    – Central heating, deepfreeze on/off

    – Ticking against central heating components

    – Coughing, slamming door, leaking tap

    – Neighbor toilet visit, flushing

    – Stagnating DVD-player, game console

    – Plock sound from water heater, tv set, roof

    – TV, radio program interference, manipulation, coughing

    – Black cats crosssing

    – Alarm sounds in shops, articles sold out

    – Other shop counter opens while waiting

    – Get wrong or defective articles

    – Blocking traffic, traffic at every corner

    – Empty battery, traffic jams, at important moments

    – Constructed car accidents, empty highway

    – Police and hospital, funeral cars around you

    – Blinding headlights, cars with one headlight, rearlight

    – Stones against car front window, sigaret buts

    – Open doors of home/car, bird droppings on windows

    – Delight in your suffering, damage to belongings

    – Drilling at neighbors and everywhere you go

    – Neighbor going up and down stairs all the time

    – Throwing sounds, saw machines outside

    – Synchronized passing, women with baby wagons

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

  • lior matatov

    AI supercomputer since 1967 abuse in skull and cook all the body is electronic weapon ! The neighbours is another new edge to kill you faster.

  • lior matatov

    I hear new sadistic sentence and sound as bark into skull every milisecond.

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    There are multiple indicators that Alexis held a delusional belief that he was being controlled or influenced by extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves. The etching of “My ELF weapon!” on the left side of the receiver of the Remington 870 shotgun is believed to reference these electromagnetic waves. In addition, a document retrieved from his electronic media stated, “Ultra low frequency attack is what I’ve been subject to for the last 3 months, and to be perfectly honest that is what has driven me to this.”

    ELF technology was a legitimate program for naval sub-tonal submarine communications; however, conspiracy theories exist which misinterpret its application as the weaponization of remote neural frequencies for government monitoring and manipulation of unsuspecting citizens.

    While announcing these developments in this ongoing joint investigation, Assistant Director Parlave, Chief Lanier, Special Agent in Charge Monroe, U.S. Attorney Machen, Special Agent in Charge Vasilko, and Chief Chambers commended the work of investigators and analysts who continue to conduct a complete and thorough investigation into the tragic events at the Washington Navy Yard.

    https://www.fbi.gov/washingtondc/press-releases/2013/law-enforcement-shares-findings-of-the-investigation-into-the-washington-navy-yard-shootings

    https://www.fbi.gov/news/navy-yard-shootings-investigation

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Navy_Yard_shooting

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    A Japanese man who has spent more than 45 years on death row has been freed after a court ordered a retrial in his murder case, amid suggestions that police investigators fabricated evidence against him.

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    As seen above, there exist similarities between the clinical symptoms of schizophrenia and demonic possession. Common symptoms in schizophrenia and demonic possession such as hallucinations and delusions may be a result of the fact that demons in the vicinity of the brain may form the symptoms of schizophrenia. Delusions of schizophrenia such as “My feelings and movements are controlled by others in a certain way” and “They put thoughts in my head that are not mine” may be thoughts that stem from the effects of demons on the brain. In schizophrenia, the hallucination may be an auditory input also derived from demons, and the patient may hear these inputs not audible to the observer. The hallucination in schizophrenia may therefore be an illusion—a false interpretation of a real sensory image formed by demons. This input seems to be construed by the patient as “bad things,” reflecting the operation of the nervous system on the poorly structured sensory input to form an acceptable percept. On the other hand, auditory hallucinations expressed as voices arguing with one another and talking to the patient in the third person may be a result of the presence of more than one demon in the body. (p. 776)

  • lior matatov

    Grove Auditorium, Magdalen College, Longwall Street, Oxford

    4 November 2015, 6-8pm

    i. A half-century of stasis in psychiatric therapeutics reflects the enormous scientific hurdles posed by psychiatric disorders.

    ii. However, it also reveals the need for new ways of thinking and a more honest response to evidence.

    iii. Psychiatry has yet to grasp the complexity that lies at the heart of human cognition and behavior as well as psychopathology.

    a. There are few, if any, main effects in the genesis of psychopathology

    i. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of genes, contribute small incremental to the pathogenesis of mental illness

    ii. Current ‘candidate’ gene by environment approaches are still reductive heuristics, not explanations of psychopathology.

    b. Overly reductive pharmacologic and endocrine models persist in academic research despite contrary evidence, as do failed animal models rejected by industry.

    c. Linear, causal psychological narratives may be comforting, even helpful, but are not veridical

    i. Motivation and decision-making are opaque to introspection (as Freud knew, but lacked the tools to investigate).

    ii. Cognitive and computational neuroscience are beginning to draw a better picture

    d. The DSM classification, based on drawing a large number of fictive categories, has proved damaging to science

    iv. Epochal technological advances (genomics, computation, stem cell biology, genome engineering, microscopy, and brain-machine interfaces) are fundamentally changing the science relevant to psychiatry; new ideas are following from technologically enabled observations.

    v. The complexity is humbling, but the emerging picture of psychopathology will be one of biological mechanisms, whether of molecular targets within protein complexes (cellular machines) affected by drugs, or synapses and circuits affected by cognitive therapies, adaptive therapies, or neuromodulation.

  • lior matatov

    They vomit in skull 247 365.

  • lior matatov

    Even in my most religious moments, I have never been able to take the idea of hell seriously. Prevailing Christian theology asks us to believe that an all-powerful, all-knowing being would do what no human parent could ever do: create tens of billions of flawed and fragile creatures, pluck out a few favourites to shower in transcendent love, and send the rest to an eternity of unrelenting torment. That story has always seemed like an intellectual relic to me, a holdover from barbarism, or worse, a myth meant to coerce belief. But stripped of the religious particulars, I can see the appeal of hell as an instrument of justice, a way of righting wrongs beyond the grave. Especially in unusual circumstances.

  • lior matatov

    Crucifixion was often performed in order to terrorize and dissuade its witnesses from perpetrating particularly heinous crimes. Victims were left on display after death as warnings to others who might attempt dissent. Crucifixion was usually intended to provide a death that was particularly slow, painful (hence the term excruciating, literally “out of crucifying”), gruesome, humiliating, and public, using whatever means were most expedient for that goal. Crucifixion methods varied considerably with location and time period.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion

  • lior matatov

    gang stalking and electronic harassment = Crucifixion was often performed in order to terrorize and dissuade its witnesses from perpetrating particularly heinous crimes. Victims were left on display after death as warnings to others who might attempt dissent. Crucifixion was usually intended to provide a death that was particularly slow, painful (hence the term excruciating, literally “out of crucifying”), gruesome, humiliating, and public, using whatever means were most expedient for that goal. Crucifixion methods varied considerably with location and time period.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion

  • lior matatov

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER

    Gang stalking, often accompanied by electronic harassment/electronic torture, is used to cause the physical or mental death of the target. The target is driven insane and commits suicide, collapses into a psychiatric patient, commits a (constructed) crime. This is called premeditated murder, and the ones participating are murderers. Gang stalking is also called organized stalking but it is better to call it organized murder.

  • lior matatov

    PERSISTENT GANG STALKING NEIGHBORS ARE CRIMINALS, MURDERERS AND MUST BE JAILED

    [Published: Juli 4, 2009. Updated: Juli 13, 2009, Juli 17, 2009]

    When a person is targeted by gang stalking and electronic harassment often neighbors are involved and start cooperating with the attackers. The attackers undeniably are criminals, murderers, what does this make the neighbors actively and persistently participating in these crimes?

    Never co-operate with secret services. The first thing they do is turn you into a murderer (by making you accessory to their crimes)

    • Carl_Herman

      Thank you for your contributions to understand this condition, lior matatov.

  • lior matatov

    Take the case of Adolf Hitler. On the afternoon of 29 April 1945, Hitler was stashed deep in his Berlin bunker, watching his Third Reich collapse, when he received word that Benito Mussolini was dead. Hitler was aghast at the news, not because he’d lost yet another ally, but because of the way Mussolini had died. The Italian dictator had been trying to slink into Switzerland when he was caught, shot, and dragged to a public square in Milan, where a furious mob kicked and spat on his body, before hanging it upside down on a meat hook.

    Worried that he might meet a similar fate, Hitler decided to test the strength of his cyanide capsules by feeding a few of them to his dog, Blondie. By midafternoon on the following day, 30 April, the Red Army was rampaging through Berlin, and the Fuhrer’s empire had shrunk to a small island of land in the city centre. Rather than fight to the end and risk capture, Hitler bit into one of his cyanide pills, and fired a bullet into his head for good measure. When the Soviets reached the bunker two days later, his body had been burned and his ashes buried, in a shallow bomb crater just above ground.

    It is hard to avoid the conclusion that Hitler got off easy, given the scope and viciousness of his crimes. We might have moved beyond the Code of Hammurabi and ‘an eye for an eye’, but most of us still feel that a killer of millions deserves something sterner than a quick and painless suicide. But does anyone ever deserve hell?

  • lior matatov

    The stalkers shut down dsl internet, no technician ever see such damage and no technician coulf fix it. I suspect this time they shut down vdsl as well.

  • lior matatov

    only move home could fix it. no internet allowed.

  • lior matatov

    this can be pentagon nsa and local agents shut down the internet in such way.

  • lior matatov

    thus spit on me 247 365. say I russian 247 365 I write opinion on net – dsl disconnect for hour as game they play. thus spit on me 247 365=cruel think what you want about it.

  • lior matatov

    247 can be hour with no minute AI didnt spit. 3/4 of this 247 365 pass this way.

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    Acid throwing, also called an acid attack,[1] a vitriol attack or vitriolage, is a form of violent assault[2][3][4] defined as the act of throwing acid or a similarly corrosive substance onto the body of another “with the intention to disfigure, maim, torture, or kill.”[5] Perpetrators of these attacks throw acid at their victims, usually at their faces, burning them, and damaging skin tissue, often exposing and sometimes dissolving the bones.[6] The most common types of acid used in these attacks are sulfuric and nitric acid. Hydrochloric acid is sometimes used, but is much less damaging.[7] The long term consequences of these attacks may include blindness, as well as permanent scarring of the face and body,[8][9][10] along with far-reaching social, psychological, and economic difficulties.[5]

  • lior matatov

    Acid throwing, also called an acid attack,[1] a vitriol attack or vitriolage, is a form of violent assault[2][3][4] defined as the act of throwing acid or a similarly corrosive substance onto the body of another “with the intention to disfigure, maim, torture, or kill.”[5] Perpetrators of these attacks throw acid at their victims, usually at their faces, burning them, and damaging skin tissue, often exposing and sometimes dissolving the bones.[6] The most common types of acid used in these attacks are sulfuric and nitric acid. Hydrochloric acid is sometimes used, but is much less damaging.[7] The long term consequences of these attacks may include blindness, as well as permanent scarring of the face and body,[8][9][10] along with far-reaching social, psychological, and economic difficulties.[5]

    The same shotgun on which he had written “My ELF” contained other etchings as well. The words: “End to the torment!” “Not what y’all say!” And “Better off this way!”

    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/25/us/washington-navy-yard-investigation/?hpt=us_c2

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Navy_Yard_shooting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

    Israel, Kiryat Yam , Gyora Yoseftal St. 36 entrance A

    All neighbours are spies with spy instruments inside room

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_throwing

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    CLOSE THIS ORGANISATIONS. HOW THE ATTACKERS STILL ALIVE ?

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    SORRY, NO MORE ENEMIES – WHY YOU ARE ATTACKED

    In the past, elite and secret services managed to expand and control because of the existence of enemies like communism. But now, there are no enemies left. The last enemy, communism, disappeared with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1990. The people of the world evolved into decent persons, but the elite and secret services did not. They are still the same murderers they once were and can only maintain themselves by fighting enemies, by stealing and murdering.

    So what to do if there are no enemies left? You create enemies! At world level, Iraq was created the enemy, then Afghanistan, now Iran, etc. At state level secret services have a continuous need for new agents, victims for (medical) experiments, victims to turn into murderers. So now without enemies left, almost random normal people are put on elimination lists and pointed terrorist, psycho, pedophile, etc. while they are not. These almost random normal people are mentally and/or physically murdered and in this process also new agents are recruited.

    It is ironic that most people recruited are lower class and in fact are used to keep their own kind (the lower class people) poor and uneducated so they can easily be used by the elite and secret services for all kinds of dirty work.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(21) – normal people are murdered to keep the system running (the sick system needs blood to survive and expand) – part 2 , First Global Revolution (1993 Edition) by the Club of Rome, Chapter 5 The Vacuum (p.68)

    PEOPLE COOKERS AND CHILDREN COOKERS

    Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) come in different flavours. Most used against people is the high power microwave weapon, this weapon can be regarded as a high power microwave oven. Irradiating a person with such a weapon is cooking a person alive! Low intensity effects can be scratching, coughing, farting, etc. High intensity will make you really feel being cooked: the inside of your body feels cooking, skin burning sensations of approx. 30 centimeters diameter where the beam enters and leaves your body, gal coming out of your throat, heavy burping. A people cooker (I introduced the word people cooker in 2006) also is a creature (looks human but nothing human about it) pushing the buttons of these horrible weapons. And yes, not only do they attack innocent people but they cook children as well.

    See also: http://www.peoplecooker.com/

  • lior matatov

    SORRY, NO MORE ENEMIES – WHY YOU ARE ATTACKED

    In the past, elite and secret services managed to expand and control because of the existence of enemies like communism. But now, there are no enemies left. The last enemy, communism, disappeared with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1990. The people of the world evolved into decent persons, but the elite and secret services did not. They are still the same murderers they once were and can only maintain themselves by fighting enemies, by stealing and murdering.

    So what to do if there are no enemies left? You create enemies! At world level, Iraq was created the enemy, then Afghanistan, now Iran, etc. At state level secret services have a continuous need for new agents, victims for (medical) experiments, victims to turn into murderers. So now without enemies left, almost random normal people are put on elimination lists and pointed terrorist, psycho, pedophile, etc. while they are not. These almost random normal people are mentally and/or physically murdered and in this process also new agents are recruited.

    It is ironic that most people recruited are lower class and in fact are used to keep their own kind (the lower class people) poor and uneducated so they can easily be used by the elite and secret services for all kinds of dirty work.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(21) – normal people are murdered to keep the system running (the sick system needs blood to survive and expand) – part 2 , First Global Revolution (1993 Edition) by the Club of Rome, Chapter 5 The Vacuum (p.68)

  • lior matatov

    They are monsters.

  • lior matatov

    PEOPLE COOKERS AND CHILDREN COOKERS

    Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) come in different flavours. Most used against people is the high power microwave weapon, this weapon can be regarded as a high power microwave oven. Irradiating a person with such a weapon is cooking a person alive! Low intensity effects can be scratching, coughing, farting, etc. High intensity will make you really feel being cooked: the inside of your body feels cooking, skin burning sensations of approx. 30 centimeters diameter where the beam enters and leaves your body, gal coming out of your throat, heavy burping. A people cooker (I introduced the word people cooker in 2006) also is a creature (looks human but nothing human about it) pushing the buttons of these horrible weapons. And yes, not only do they attack innocent people but they cook children as well.

    See also: http://www.peoplecooker.com/

  • lior matatov

    USE CARS 247 OUTSIDE AND NEIGHBOUR CAR IN FRONT MY WINDOW CRIMINALS

    https://twitter.com/MaxMicrostopper

  • lior matatov

    Plainly stated: a hightechcriminal org is usin advanced user interactive tchnlgy to assault me, hackin all my stuff & stalk me remotely 24/7. You cld be next.

    https://twitter.com/iiiAshliii?lang=he

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    USE ANYONE INCLUDE HOSPITALS STAFF

    https://twitter.com/toddgiffen?lang=he

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    CARS COME AND GO INFRONT WINDOW 247

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

    https://twitter.com/MaxMicrostopper?lang=he

  • lior matatov

    POSSIBLE ITS CLOSE NEIGHBOURS CARS FROM NEAR STREET OR SAME STREET SAME CARS 247 INFRONT MY WINDOW CYNICAL

  • lior matatov

    TRACK CAR OUTSIDE HOME LIGHT HARASSMENT 247

    https://twitter.com/MaxMicrostopper?lang=he

  • lior matatov

    ALL BODY IRRADIATION , ABUSE IN SKULL 247

    https://twitter.com/DeepThoughtNews

  • lior matatov

    #psychiatry http://ObamasWeapon.com http://DrRobertDuncan.com

    Its the ultimate discrediting tactic to save a whole hospital of staffs asses+other conspiractors&they continue to target who they please.

    https://twitter.com/toddgiffen

  • lior matatov

    USE SCI FI TECH TO TORTURE AND KILL

  • lior matatov

    Israel, Kiryat Yam , Gyora Yoseftal St. 36 entrance A

    All neighbours are spies with spy instruments inside room

    TRACKING NEIGHBOURS ALL BUILDUNG INTO MY ROOM FROM THEIR ROOM 247

    LOUD AI TALK WITH THEM ON SPEAKER IN ROOM TO ATTACK AND SPY SCI FI TECH 247

    IRRADIATION NOISE AND MOVEMENTS BY AI INSTRUCTIONS 247

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER

    Gang stalking, often accompanied by electronic harassment/electronic torture, is used to cause the physical or mental death of the target. The target is driven insane and commits suicide, collapses into a psychiatric patient, commits a (constructed) crime. This is called premeditated murder, and the ones participating are murderers. Gang stalking is also called organized stalking but it is better to call it organized murder.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(17) – Gang stalkers and people cookers are murderers, the crimes they commit belong to the worst crimes in history

    A very limited list of gang stalking a.k.a. organized stalking methods:

    – Sleep deprivation day-by-day, social isolation

    – Always surrounded, never alone, no privacy

    – Neighbor stalking, rude behaviour from random people

    – Workplace mobbing, breaking friendships

    – Character assasination, rumours spread

    – Feedback about conversations nobody can know

    – Honking horn, shoving chairs, bouncing ball, shoes with high heels

    – Receive phone calls, emails (popup/sound), SMSs at specific moments

    – Pidgeon cooing, crow screaming, dog barking on/off

    – Central heating, deepfreeze on/off

    – Ticking against central heating components

    – Coughing, slamming door, leaking tap

    – Neighbor toilet visit, flushing

    – Stagnating DVD-player, game console

    – Plock sound from water heater, tv set, roof

    – TV, radio program interference, manipulation, coughing

    – Black cats crosssing

    – Alarm sounds in shops, articles sold out

    – Other shop counter opens while waiting

    – Get wrong or defective articles

    – Blocking traffic, traffic at every corner

    – Empty battery, traffic jams, at important moments

    – Constructed car accidents, empty highway

    – Police and hospital, funeral cars around you

    – Blinding headlights, cars with one headlight, rearlight

    – Stones against car front window, sigaret buts

    – Open doors of home/car, bird droppings on windows

    – Delight in your suffering, damage to belongings

    – Drilling at neighbors and everywhere you go

    – Neighbor going up and down stairs all the time

    – Throwing sounds, saw machines outside

    – Synchronized passing, women with baby wagons

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds

  • lior matatov

    ALL AROUND AI ENGINEER 247

  • lior matatov

    AI TRACK ME TALK WITH THEM 247

  • lior matatov

    ROBOT AND HUMAN ROBOT

  • lior matatov

    NAZIS it from state as nazis citizens secret services and police murdur the victim together. All based and around computer engineering . they use everyone around the victim and their private property to harass 247.

    http://www.amazon.com/Engineers-Jihad-Connection-Extremism-Education/dp/0691145172?tag=interbusintim-21

    The violent actions of a few extremists can alter the course of history, yet there persists a yawning gap between the potential impact of these individuals and what we understand about them. In Engineers of Jihad, Diego Gambetta and Steffen Hertog uncover two unexpected facts, which they imaginatively leverage to narrow that gap: they find that a disproportionate share of Islamist radicals come from an engineering background, and that Islamist and right-wing extremism have more in common than either does with left-wing extremism, in which engineers are absent while social scientists and humanities students are prominent.

    Searching for an explanation, they tackle four general questions about extremism: Under which socioeconomic conditions do people join extremist groups? Does the profile of extremists reflect how they self-select into extremism or how groups recruit them? Does ideology matter in sorting who joins which group? Lastly, is there a mindset susceptible to certain types of extremism?

    Using rigorous methods and several new datasets, they explain the link between educational discipline and type of radicalism by looking at two key factors: the social mobility (or lack thereof) for engineers in the Muslim world, and a particular mindset seeking order and hierarchy that is found more frequently among engineers. Engineers’ presence in some extremist groups and not others, the authors argue, is a proxy for individual traits that may account for the much larger question of selective recruitment to radical activism.

    Opening up markedly new perspectives on the motivations of political violence, Engineers of Jihad yields unexpected answers about the nature and emergence of extremism.

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER

    Gang stalking, often accompanied by electronic harassment/electronic torture, is used to cause the physical or mental death of the target. The target is driven insane and commits suicide, collapses into a psychiatric patient, commits a (constructed) crime. This is called premeditated murder, and the ones participating are murderers. Gang stalking is also called organized stalking but it is better to call it organized murder.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(17) – Gang stalkers and people cookers are murderers, the crimes they commit belong to the worst crimes in history

    A very limited list of gang stalking a.k.a. organized stalking methods:

    – Sleep deprivation day-by-day, social isolation

    – Always surrounded, never alone, no privacy

    – Neighbor stalking, rude behaviour from random people

    – Workplace mobbing, breaking friendships

    – Character assasination, rumours spread

    – Feedback about conversations nobody can know

    – Honking horn, shoving chairs, bouncing ball, shoes with high heels

    – Receive phone calls, emails (popup/sound), SMSs at specific moments

    – Pidgeon cooing, crow screaming, dog barking on/off

    – Central heating, deepfreeze on/off

    – Ticking against central heating components

    – Coughing, slamming door, leaking tap

    – Neighbor toilet visit, flushing

    – Stagnating DVD-player, game console

    – Plock sound from water heater, tv set, roof

    – TV, radio program interference, manipulation, coughing

    – Black cats crosssing

    – Alarm sounds in shops, articles sold out

    – Other shop counter opens while waiting

    – Get wrong or defective articles

    – Blocking traffic, traffic at every corner

    – Empty battery, traffic jams, at important moments

    – Constructed car accidents, empty highway

    – Police and hospital, funeral cars around you

    – Blinding headlights, cars with one headlight, rearlight

    – Stones against car front window, sigaret buts

    – Open doors of home/car, bird droppings on windows

    – Delight in your suffering, damage to belongings

    – Drilling at neighbors and everywhere you go

    – Neighbor going up and down stairs all the time

    – Throwing sounds, saw machines outside

    – Synchronized passing, women with baby wagons

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

    ELECTRONIC HARASSMENT = ELECTRONIC TORTURE

    Electronic harassment often is used to describe attacks with electronic weapons, like directed energy weapons (microwave weapons, sonic weapons), mind reading and mind control weapons. These weapons are used to manipulate, incapacitate, torture and murder, mostly to steal. Shooting, burning, cooking and mind reading and mind controlling people, including children with these weapons are crimes against humanity and horrible violations of human rights.

    See also: The people cookers – cooking people like a microwave oven cooks meat, http://www.electronictorture.com

    A very limited list of physical effects that can be achieved using electronic weapons, many effects can be achieved suddenly, i.e. within a second, instant coughing, instant sneezing, pain, etc.:

    – Scratching

    – Stomach pain

    – Urge to urinate

    – Urge to defecate

    – Diareah

    – Coughing, sneezing

    – Burping, farting

    – Sleepiness

    – Yawning

    – Stomach pain

    – Kidney pain

    – Painful feet

    – Painful legs

    – Sleeping hands

    – Heart attack

    – Chest pressure

    – Bubling stomach

    – Blurred vision

    – Nausea

    – Fatigue

    – Heating head/body

    – Spleen pain

    – Muscle pain

    – Chest pain

    – Blind gut attack

    – Back pain

    – Racing heart

    – Runny nose

    – Erection problems

    – Sexual stimulation

    – Toothache

    – Headache

    – Hearing problems

    – Sudden confusion

    – Sudden memory loss

    Electronic weapons are also used to attack our brain:

    – Read your thoughts, subvocal speech

    – Make you hear voices, tinnitus symptoms

    – Plant thoughts into your head you cannot distinguish from your own thoughts unless you are aware

    – Dream manipulation

    Electronic weapons can also be used to cause all kinds of other effects:

    – Plock sounds in your home

    – Destroy your light bulbs

    – Destroy garden plants

    – Etc.

    These weapons are used for over a decade by our national secret services. Often almost random innocent people, civilians, including children, are attacked, experimented upon.

    WARNING: YOU NO LONGER CAN TRUST YOUR OWN THOUGHTS

  • lior matatov

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER Character assasination, rumours spread Just by doing it it character assasination

  • lior matatov

    Any idiot dont knoe me in one day become murder psychopath with spy tech for track until last breath 247 it evil 100% cooperation 247 it evil the neighbours dont care you die it nazis.

  • lior matatov

    They espoinage and attack 247 your body

  • lior matatov

    eyes camera mind microphone and loudspeaker ears microphone 247 you have no control plus irradiate entire body 247 they watch you die

  • lior matatov

    I afraid 247 365 call computer technician because Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds.

    They use each possible moment intimidate the target from any room from all flats 2 meter distance door to door at stairs 2 blocks used, all want kill me 247 265

  • lior matatov

    They operate Intercom by AI dicision each moment harassing noise automatic from any one of possibility at least 10 neighbour flat combined. It not 1 neighbour it almost all 4 blocks around and want to kill me. They cover each other so all criminals and murderers are involved. No 1 unrecruited to attack me ! all infomed they need to kill me.

    • Paul Chach Mcarthy

      Its not your neighbours. To them, they are just acting normally, its the stuff inside them coordinating it all, the bioapi interface, nanotech.

  • lior matatov

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony

    Eyewitness testimony is the account a bystander gives in the courtroom, describing what that person observed that occurred during the specific incident under investigation. Ideally this recollection of events is detailed, however this is not always the case. This recollection is used as evidence to show what happened from a witness’ point of view. Memory recall has been considered a credible source in the past, but has recently come under attack as forensics can now support psychologists in their claim that memories and individual perceptions are unreliable; being easily manipulated, altered, and biased. Due to this, many countries and states within the US are now attempting to make changes in how eyewitness testimony is presented in court. Eyewitness testimony is a specialized focus within cognitive psychology.

  • lior matatov

    Almost entirely of talk in skull is about neighbours it the main ISSUE for years SADISM

    GANG STALKING = ORGANIZED MURDER

    Gang stalking, often accompanied by electronic harassment/electronic torture, is used to cause the physical or mental death of the target. The target is driven insane and commits suicide, collapses into a psychiatric patient, commits a (constructed) crime. This is called premeditated murder, and the ones participating are murderers. Gang stalking is also called organized stalking but it is better to call it organized murder.

    See also: Secret service: fear for the truth to be revealed!(17) – Gang stalkers and people cookers are murderers, the crimes they commit belong to the worst crimes in history

    A very limited list of gang stalking a.k.a. organized stalking methods:

    – Sleep deprivation day-by-day, social isolation

    – Always surrounded, never alone, no privacy

    – Neighbor stalking, rude behaviour from random people

    – Workplace mobbing, breaking friendships

    – Character assasination, rumours spread

    – Feedback about conversations nobody can know

    – Honking horn, shoving chairs, bouncing ball, shoes with high heels

    – Receive phone calls, emails (popup/sound), SMSs at specific moments

    – Pidgeon cooing, crow screaming, dog barking on/off

    – Central heating, deepfreeze on/off

    – Ticking against central heating components

    – Coughing, slamming door, leaking tap

    – Neighbor toilet visit, flushing

    – Stagnating DVD-player, game console

    – Plock sound from water heater, tv set, roof

    – TV, radio program interference, manipulation, coughing

    – Black cats crosssing

    – Alarm sounds in shops, articles sold out

    – Other shop counter opens while waiting

    – Get wrong or defective articles

    – Blocking traffic, traffic at every corner

    – Empty battery, traffic jams, at important moments

    – Constructed car accidents, empty highway

    – Police and hospital, funeral cars around you

    – Blinding headlights, cars with one headlight, rearlight

    – Stones against car front window, sigaret buts

    – Open doors of home/car, bird droppings on windows

    – Delight in your suffering, damage to belongings

    – Drilling at neighbors and everywhere you go

    – Neighbor going up and down stairs all the time

    – Throwing sounds, saw machines outside

    – Synchronized passing, women with baby wagons

    Many people experience some of the above once or a few times. The victims of these crimes experience this day-by-day, 24/7. Many events are synchronized to the victim movements. Often also electronic weapons are used e.g. to prevent sleep, create plock sounds

  • lior matatov

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize

    The Nobel Prize (Swedish pronunciation: [nʊˈbɛl], Swedish definite form, singular: Nobelpriset; Norwegian: Nobelprisen) is a set of annual international awards bestowed in a number of categories by Swedish and Norwegian committees in recognition of academic, cultural and/or scientific advances.

    The will of the Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel established the prizes in 1895. The prizes in Chemistry, Literature, Peace, Physics, and Physiology or Medicine were first awarded in 1901.[1] The related Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was established by Sweden’s central bank in 1968. Medals made before 1980 were struck in 23 carat gold, and later from 18 carat green gold plated with a 24 carat gold coating. Between 1901 and 2015, the Nobel Prizes and the Prize in Economic Sciences were awarded 573 times to 900 people and organizations. With some receiving the Nobel Prize more than once, this makes a total of 870 individuals (822 men and 48 women)[2] and 23 organizations.

    The prize ceremonies take place annually in Stockholm, Sweden, except for the peace prize which is held in Oslo, Norway and each recipient, or laureate, receives a gold medal, a diploma and a sum of money that has been decided by the Nobel Foundation. (As of 2012, each prize was worth SEK8 million or about US$1.2 million, €0.93 million or £0.6 million.) The Nobel Prize is widely regarded as the most prestigious award available in the fields of literature, medicine, physics, chemistry, peace, and economics.[3]

    The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the Nobel Prize in Physics, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, and the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences; the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet awards the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine; the Swedish Academy grants the Nobel Prize in Literature; and the Nobel Peace Prize is awarded not by a Swedish organisation but by the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

    The prize is not awarded posthumously; however, if a person is awarded a prize and dies before receiving it, the prize may still be presented.[4] Though the average number of laureates per prize increased substantially during the 20th century, a prize may not be shared among more than three people.[5]

  • lior matatov

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_Holocaust

    Obedience[edit]

    Stanley Milgram was one of a number of post-war psychologists and sociologists who tried to address why people obeyed immoral orders in the Holocaust. Milgram’s findings demonstrated that reasonable people, when instructed by a person in a position of authority, obeyed commands entailing what they believed to be the suffering of others. After making his results public, Milgram sparked direct critical response in the scientific community by claiming that “a common psychological process is centrally involved in both [his laboratory experiments and Nazi Germany] events.” Professor James Waller, Chair of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Keene State College, formerly Chair of Whitworth College Psychology Department, expressed the opinion that Milgram experiments do not correspond well to the Holocaust events:[25]

    The subjects of Milgram experiments, wrote James Waller (Becoming Evil), were assured in advance that no permanent physical damage would result from their actions. However, the Holocaust perpetrators were fully aware of their hands-on killing and maiming of the victims.

    The laboratory subjects themselves did not know their victims and were not motivated by racism. On the other hand, the Holocaust perpetrators displayed an intense devaluation of the victims through a lifetime of personal development.

    Those serving punishment at the lab were not sadists, nor hate-mongers, and often exhibited great anguish and conflict in the experiment, unlike the designers and executioners of the Final Solution (see Holocaust trials), who had a clear “goal” on their hands, set beforehand.

    The experiment lasted for an hour, with no time for the subjects to contemplate the implications of their behavior. Meanwhile, the Holocaust lasted for years with ample time for a moral assessment of all individuals and organizations involved.[25]

    In the opinion of Thomas Blass—who is the author of a scholarly monograph on the experiment (The Man Who Shocked The World) published in 2004—the historical evidence pertaining to actions of the Holocaust perpetrators speaks louder than words:

    My own view is that Milgram’s approach does not provide a fully adequate explanation of the Holocaust. While it may well account for the dutiful destructiveness of the dispassionate bureaucrat who may have shipped Jews to Auschwitz with the same degree of routinization as potatoes to Bremerhaven, it falls short when one tries to apply it to the more zealous, inventive, and hate-driven atrocities that also characterized the Holocaust.[26]

    Herding and other factors[edit]

    The Holocaust is a clear example of two factors at work. One is described by the “boiling frog” theory, which says that an enormous change will not be noticed if it occurs in gradual steps. The other factor is the primal and powerful mechanism of herding, which has its home in the limbic system and ensures that individuals conform to the group. This mechanism has evolved through natural selection to ensure that human groups survive. Together, these factors make conforming to the group a stronger impulse than breaking out, even if the individual does not agree with what the group is doing. So long as the gradual changes in group behaviour are small, herding can eventually take the group towards a state that is far removed from past behavior and is more and more extreme. Thus, participants in the Holocaust may have privately felt horror or disgust at what they were ordered to do but stayed in line with the group. These effects have been exploited many times in history by demagogues and revolutionaries; they are also seen in bullying.[27]

    Studies of mass psychology, kick-started by Carl Jung but currently being developed under various labels, suggest that the causal mechanism for crowd behaviour is the reverse of what is commonly believed. The socionomic perspective says that, rather than persecution making people fearful and downtrodden, fearful and downtrodden people look for someone to persecute.[28]

    The Jungian-socionomic analysis says that after the humiliation of World War I, the economic ruin of the Weimar Republic, being forced to pay war reparations and the Great Depression, it was natural for the German people to become angry and look for someone on whom to vent their anger; herding behaviour amplified this anger and the Holocaust was the result.[28]

  • lior matatov

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_Holocaust

    Responsibility for the Holocaust is the subject of an ongoing historical debate spanning several decades. Intentionalist historians such as Lucy Dawidowicz argue that Adolf Hitler planned the extermination of the Jewish people from as early as 1918, and that he personally oversaw its execution. Functionalists such as Raul Hilberg have argued that the extermination plans evolved in stages, as a result of initiatives from bureaucrats who were responding to other policy failures.

    Herding and other factors[edit]

    The Holocaust is a clear example of two factors at work. One is described by the “boiling frog” theory, which says that an enormous change will not be noticed if it occurs in gradual steps. The other factor is the primal and powerful mechanism of herding, which has its home in the limbic system and ensures that individuals conform to the group. This mechanism has evolved through natural selection to ensure that human groups survive. Together, these factors make conforming to the group a stronger impulse than breaking out, even if the individual does not agree with what the group is doing. So long as the gradual changes in group behaviour are small, herding can eventually take the group towards a state that is far removed from past behavior and is more and more extreme. Thus, participants in the Holocaust may have privately felt horror or disgust at what they were ordered to do but stayed in line with the group. These effects have been exploited many times in history by demagogues and revolutionaries; they are also seen in bullying.[27]

    Studies of mass psychology, kick-started by Carl Jung but currently being developed under various labels, suggest that the causal mechanism for crowd behaviour is the reverse of what is commonly believed. The socionomic perspective says that, rather than persecution making people fearful and downtrodden, fearful and downtrodden people look for someone to persecute.[28]

    The Jungian-socionomic analysis says that after the humiliation of World War I, the economic ruin of the Weimar Republic, being forced to pay war reparations and the Great Depression, it was natural for the German people to become angry and look for someone on whom to vent their anger; herding behaviour amplified this anger and the Holocaust was the result.[28]

    Contents [hide]

    1 Historical and philosophical interpretations

    1.1 Who authorized the killings?

    1.2 Allies knowledge of the atrocities

    1.2.1 The Holocaust: What the average Germans knew

    1.3 Who carried out the killings?

    1.4 Obedience

    1.5 Herding and other factors

    1.6 Religious hatred and racism

    2 Functionalism versus intentionalism

    3 Involved

    3.1 Hitler

    3.2 Other Nazi leaders

    3.2.1 Legal proceedings against Nazis

    3.3 The German Army

    3.4 The German people

    3.5 Other states

    3.5.1 Baltic states

    3.5.2 Belgium

    3.5.3 Bulgaria

    3.5.4 Croatia

    3.5.5 Denmark

    3.5.6 Finland

    3.5.7 France

    3.5.8 Greece

    3.5.9 Hungary

    3.5.10 Italy

    3.5.11 Netherlands

    3.5.12 Norway

    3.5.13 Palestine

    3.5.14 Poland

    3.5.15 Romania

    3.5.16 Serbia

    3.5.17 Slovakia

    3.5.18 Spain

    3.5.18.1 Compiling list of Jews in Spain for the Nazis

    3.5.19 Soviet territories

    3.5.20 Switzerland

    3.5.21 United States

    4 See also

    5 References

  • lior matatov

    WORLDWIDE SECRET SERVICES WORLDWIDE BEHAVIOR OF NEIGHBOIRS IT IS NAZIS

  • lior matatov

    Herding and other factors[edit]

    The Holocaust is a clear example of two factors at work. One is described by the “boiling frog” theory, which says that an enormous change will not be noticed if it occurs in gradual steps. The other factor is the primal and powerful mechanism of herding, which has its home in the limbic system and ensures that individuals conform to the group. This mechanism has evolved through natural selection to ensure that human groups survive. Together, these factors make conforming to the group a stronger impulse than breaking out, even if the individual does not agree with what the group is doing. So long as the gradual changes in group behaviour are small, herding can eventually take the group towards a state that is far removed from past behavior and is more and more extreme. Thus, participants in the Holocaust may have privately felt horror or disgust at what they were ordered to do but stayed in line with the group. These effects have been exploited many times in history by demagogues and revolutionaries; they are also seen in bullying.[27]

    Studies of mass psychology, kick-started by Carl Jung but currently being developed under various labels, suggest that the causal mechanism for crowd behaviour is the reverse of what is commonly believed. The socionomic perspective says that, rather than persecution making people fearful and downtrodden, fearful and downtrodden people look for someone to persecute.[28]

    The Jungian-socionomic analysis says that after the humiliation of World War I, the economic ruin of the Weimar Republic, being forced to pay war reparations and the Great Depression, it was natural for the German people to become angry and look for someone on whom to vent their anger; herding behaviour amplified this anger and the Holocaust was the result.[28]

  • lior matatov

    THE COOPERATION IS AT HOLOCOUST LEVEL

    • quietone

      Hi Lior,
      I’m guessing you are Israeli? If so, I am looking for other Jews/Israelis that are suffering from this. I found one woman there who works with children for goodness sakes. It started with me when I started studying Judaism but didn’t get it for a long time. If there is a way to contact you, let me know here. I’ll check now and then, or reach me at chesedite at a site that uses rainbow colors ….

  • lior matatov

    ALL SECRET SERVICES ARE CRIMINALS MONSTERS NAZIS WORLDWIDE

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_Holocaust#Herding_and_other_factors

    Herding and other factors[edit]

    The Holocaust is a clear example of two factors at work. One is described by the “boiling frog” theory, which says that an enormous change will not be noticed if it occurs in gradual steps. The other factor is the primal and powerful mechanism of herding, which has its home in the limbic system and ensures that individuals conform to the group. This mechanism has evolved through natural selection to ensure that human groups survive. Together, these factors make conforming to the group a stronger impulse than breaking out, even if the individual does not agree with what the group is doing. So long as the gradual changes in group behaviour are small, herding can eventually take the group towards a state that is far removed from past behavior and is more and more extreme. Thus, participants in the Holocaust may have privately felt horror or disgust at what they were ordered to do but stayed in line with the group. These effects have been exploited many times in history by demagogues and revolutionaries; they are also seen in bullying.[27]

    Studies of mass psychology, kick-started by Carl Jung but currently being developed under various labels, suggest that the causal mechanism for crowd behaviour is the reverse of what is commonly believed. The socionomic perspective says that, rather than persecution making people fearful and downtrodden, fearful and downtrodden people look for someone to persecute.[28]

    The Jungian-socionomic analysis says that after the humiliation of World War I, the economic ruin of the Weimar Republic, being forced to pay war reparations and the Great Depression, it was natural for the German people to become angry and look for someone on whom to vent their anger; herding behaviour amplified this anger and the Holocaust was the result.[28]

  • lior matatov
  • lior matatov

    The same shotgun on which he had written “My ELF” contained other etchings as well. The words: “End to the torment!” “Not what y’all say!” And “Better off this way!”

    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/25/us/washington-navy-yard-investigation/?hpt=us_c2

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Navy_Yard_shooting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

    Are organized neighborhood stalking, murders? That is the question many are asking. Many report the same dynamic happening all over the world and especially organized stalking in communities across the USA which are identical in procedure.

    https://www.stopeg.com/neighborsmurderers.html

    terrorkrrina.blogspot.com

    http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/net/ViewEntry.aspx?entryId=1394216&skip=1

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/targeted-individuals-testimony-current-government-covert-torture-control-experiments.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h02Nh4tlg7s&feature=share

    http://tragicmyronmay.org

    http://www.icaact.org/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Uo_db9uXc&feature=share

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    http://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/Such.things.are.known.htm

    http://www.amazon.ca/Such-Things-Known-Dorothy-Burdick/dp/0533051673

    http://www.constantinereport.com/interview-author-dorothy-burdick-on-nazi-style-cia-psychotronic-experimentation-such-things-are-known-excerpts/

    http://www.emetaheret.org.il/2012/07/26/%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%AA-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%92%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%A7-%D7%94%D7%A1%D7%95%D7%93%D7%99-emf/

  • lior matatov

    Israel, Kiryat Yam , Gyora Yoseftal St. 36 entrance A

    All neighbours are spies with spy instruments inside room

    The same shotgun on which he had written “My ELF” contained other etchings as well. The words: “End to the torment!” “Not what y’all say!” And “Better off this way!”

    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/25/us/washington-navy-yard-investigation/?hpt=us_c2

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Navy_Yard_shooting

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

    Are organized neighborhood stalking, murders? That is the question many are asking. Many report the same dynamic happening all over the world and especially organized stalking in communities across the USA which are identical in procedure.

    https://www.stopeg.com/neighborsmurderers.html

    terrorkrrina.blogspot.com

    http://www.tapuz.co.il/blog/net/ViewEntry.aspx?entryId=1394216&skip=1

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/01/targeted-individuals-testimony-current-government-covert-torture-control-experiments.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h02Nh4tlg7s&feature=share

    http://tragicmyronmay.org

    http://www.icaact.org/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2Uo_db9uXc&feature=share

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    http://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/Such.things.are.known.htm

    http://www.amazon.ca/Such-Things-Known-Dorothy-Burdick/dp/0533051673

    http://www.constantinereport.com/interview-author-dorothy-burdick-on-nazi-style-cia-psychotronic-experimentation-such-things-are-known-excerpts/

    http://www.emetaheret.org.il/2012/07/26/%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%AA-%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%92%D7%9C-%D7%94%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%A7-%D7%94%D7%A1%D7%95%D7%93%D7%99-emf/

  • lior matatov

    ALL NEIGHBOURS SHOULD BE ARRESTED AND INVESTIGATED THIS WAY SO THEY KNOW THEIR STATE

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handcuffs

    Handcuffs are restraint devices designed to secure an individual’s wrists close together. They comprise two parts, linked together by a chain, a hinge, or rigid bar. Each half has a rotating arm which engages with a ratchet that prevents it from being opened once closed around a person’s wrist. Without the key, the handcuffs cannot be removed and so the handcuffed person is unable to move his or her wrists more than a few centimetres/inches apart, making many tasks difficult or impossible. This is usually done to prevent suspected criminals from escaping police custody.

  • lior matatov

    ALL NEIGHBOURS IN ROOMS ISSUE IS FOR POLICE INVESTIGATION

  • lior matatov

    HEY NEVER HANDCUFF AND ARREST THEM SHOW THEY MURDUR TOGETHER WITH THEM THEY ATTACK ME TOGETHER WITH POLICE WE ARE NOT KIDS TEENAGERS IN SCHOOL WHERE IS RESPONSIBILITY OF NEIGHBOURS AND POLICE

  • lior matatov

    HEY ATTACK ME 247 AS KIDS IN SCHOOL POLICE RESPONSIBLE ARREST AND INVESTIGATE THEM ABOUT ABUSE THE LAW NOT APPLY TO ADRESSES I LIVE

  • lior matatov

    IT IS AS ALL HOUSE CAMERA FROM ALL THE WALLS AND ALL NEIGHBOURS WATCH IN THEIR OWN FLAT AND ROOM INCLUDE PHOTOS VIDEOS TO 247 HARASSERS IN CARS IN FRONT MY WINDOW

    EXEGGERATE IT 100 TIMES AS IT IS INSERT TO 247 THOUGH PROCESS IT IS CRIME

    THE POLICE PROVIDE COMPLETE LEGAL COVER FOR SECRET SERVICES AND NEIGHBOIURS OPERATE DEATH CAMP AT THIS ADRESS

    Gyora Yoseftal St 36

    Kiryat Yam

  • lior matatov

    ALL NEIGHBOURS ARE CRIMINALS 247 365

    Gyora Yoseftal St 36

    Kiryat Yam

  • lior matatov

    THEY BUSY WITH CRIME 247 365

    Gyora Yoseftal St 36

    Kiryat Yam

  • lior matatov

    THEY USE 247 SILENT SOUND SPEAKER FROM NEIGHBOURS ROOM SO YOU INTIMIDATED WITH AI THREATS FROM MANY DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS 360 DIRECTION IT IS WORLDWIDE SPY OPERATION ALL SECRET SERVICES AND LAW ENFORCEMENT – POLICE INVOLVED MAKE IT UNSTOPPABLE, NO LAW THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT

    THEY BUSY WITH CRIME 247 365

    Gyora Yoseftal St 36

    Kiryat Yam

  • lior matatov

    It is capabilities extra ordinary comparable to atomic bomb destroy entire cities , but multiple effects than can be counted in simple way, sum it as cooking and put voices in skull read thoughts location asd body is gps walking 247. They put bery dangerous loudpeaker of V2K voice to skull or silent sound it mean it silent in between person and environment but all the way from speaker to person skull it somekind of electonc mcrowave loaser – somekind of maser, you hear from at least 10 ocations – they put such loudpeaker in all rooms – or flat but at least 1 per flat can be flat 2 meters flat near you 24 hours somekind of cheerleader sound of intimidation it so sick because it is electronc somekind of dictionary sinthetic didactic voice speak the same all the time with intimidation content if it was such realk loudpeaker no one will stay silent but because only you hear this loudspeaker sound 247 if you exaplin it to neighbours what he doig and call police to stop this sound you get no answer.

    It not only so silent and covert but real harassing repetitive sounds all buildong hear each minute from one of at least 10 location most of them inside this builidng 4 floor 8 apartments. It is called condo – common proprietry housing each one pay his part, so all “house” involved attack you from very close range – distance. In addition to confuse you , because 247 you can go with airplane from country to other country from your continent to other continent pon planet earth, still this sinthetic voice and cooking from satelite is follow you aytomatic. This gang stalking method in addition to this real can be called covert attacks require persistent involvewment and cover up of crimes bu net of police – never investigate and stop this people so you can blame them in court, it is beyond common law it as crime the state itself has to demand investigate even if the victim not complian ewhy ? If it murdur cas,e toyu can die but the state blame the attacker, the murdurer. Even this not done, in common law you can’t blame people the polcie nevver deal with never arretsted.

    The AI is as leader of this symphony it operate as intercom with access all the time 247 o all his resources- options in the neighbours flat can operate moving parts you can hear it harassment with real harassibng sounds, has access to 24 hours put content in their V2K silent sound loudspeakers, by follow yyour every movement it calculated and presented also presented by real physical follow and harassment by cars outside neighbours who follow you have access to information no one have as what you doing in youre own flat what you thinking in your 4 walls and it collect information you have no control and never agree 24 hours it can choose whenever it want attack by this information through real physical follow and harassment by real people and not only electronic weapons, you persecuted in your own private flat 247 with no control of anything.

    They are not normal, use large group of monsters live near you and aloow use their private property, flat to allow attack you inside your 4 walls 247. You can’t talk to them or police as they not answer.

    Why it can’t be investigated as crime, as something as illegal activity more important then drugs activity in building and neghbours, as someone try to install bomb in his 4 walls. This silent sound soudspeaker is weapon.

    All the idea is attack me non stop 247. What it say exactly not so relevant. In the sound itself is attacking sound unbearable to hear.

    Also cooking all the body 247 and hear with it this electronic same sound 247 for years.

    This called agreement with silent the fact around the world not singler person ever arrested investigated about his criminal activity not ever such electronic weapon or loudspeaker of silent sound or any other electronic weapon from rooms of neighbours ever arrested and shown as proof.

    What make me think it police part of conspiracy neever answer the victims to provide legal assistence to criminals and leave the victim as helpless as possible with no resorced protect himself.

    If no one arrested no court can help it is the forst step to stop it. The phenomenom of entire building – I live in block it mean 4 buildiungs connceted together, not only my block but next block of the 4 blocks is used to harass me wi thsilent spounds loudspeaer, spy neighbours and all the tech they put in each flat. It mean all the flat here are the same with same characteristics and same type of spy neighbours.

    They think it better involve entire 2 building, and perhaps entire 4 buildings block knowing what they doing so they straught them up in case any question they ge4t, as close any possiblility to encouter normal behavior, such as people call polcie in regard noise, crasy person control entire building, in regard spy actvity 247 in all the building.

    And if it not enough real persons can really think what I say is craqsy person experiences can never be real. So it multiple the evil in conspiracy of silence regard me 1000 times then if it was a crime anyone beleive me. It already done 50 years this way, silence the victim and any witness reluctant to help by say what he did what his crimes.

    It show people are not normal and smart people should think what to do to check akk of this things, things as covert as AI in branis and body of people to much more easy to detect as criminal cooperation of neighbour of victims, which show to such degree things can be.

  • lior matatov

    What happen ? You talk with neighbours to stop this behaviors, go to pol;ice and report the crasy person control entire building. bwhat happen ? They then 247 listen and spy about you in your own flat and thoghts. Ity is so sick and evil behavior need to be stop, by police themself. No point at call to stop this behaviors by people who then after talk to them continue spy after you and your htoughts inside their own rooms. All the spy tech inside their flat need to be arrested at police and investigated as what this equipment all about and neighbour investigated who give it to them how ehat they doing with this tech. Nothing of this ever happened. They so extreme this same monster behaviors i was get before some years from sociall workers operate house for mental disabilities, I encouter the same behaviors from them it turn ordinary citizens to monsters ewho never want stop this behaviors, because they can with no permission form your side follow you and your thoughts inside their own flat – what happened with social workers.

    It planned in such way this hang stalking than policeman who your neighbours will cooperate exactly as any other neighour.

    Ihn addition to this they poison me and all the condo with poisons, for hours with effects of make you very nervous and tired what this material I don’t know this go this way many years. Nothing of it stopped.

    I have to complain about gas poisoning me for hours while neighbours themself breath this to their lungs and brain.

    Also most of neighbuors can move apartment and forget aobut it contunue their life. I ccan’t its not another neighbours conflicyt, it follow me from and to any buoilding and place of living I can find myself – I can’t think of place they can’t use as resource4s by proivate propert of neighbours – flats, housing and neighbours themself.

    And it exeggarated if you live in place as Israel, where you find yourself live in condo of 4 blocks get attacks from at least 10 such flats with people in this flat know all the details they should not know.

    This charaqcter assasination is only by doing so and keep silent. Someone fomr outside ned to stop this asylum crasy house. They defend eacxh other while keep currently do monsters things and follow and intimidate the neighbour 247.

    In go do such extreme, they togethwer all the building complain about you while keeping 247 attacks, so you have no place to live.

    This people who should not even know who live in my apartment, within a day become people can threat attack and threat you if you tell them stop they can complain about you while ALL building eyewitness to your bizzare.

    They pretend they don’t know they attacked you for more then year don’t know anything and you are bizzare say they attacked you. It really what happen in real world. It seems they get all the cooperation they need to do thids from policed government secret services so they not afraid and encouraged stay criminals as they are.

    If they only want to live their own peaceful life they encourage to cooperate with dangerous peiople most evil and sadistic on this planet as ling as they live near you.

    It is such degree of situation. This as crasies they encouraged all the time to behavior opposite of what you ask for normal people, they act as criminals. A lot research is done in regard this, but it such degree it remind things as holocoust. The psychology of how this normalk people until this agent sadistic approached them anbd changed their nature within day is researched in psychology and it is known phenomenom but it repeated this way why ? Because they never arrested, all they encouraged is behavior as criminals. is not different.

    You can live normal life when attacked this way from all flats in building 247.

  • lior matatov

    Gyora Yoseftal St 36

    Kiryat Yam

    They simply get vrasy, they se you live alone, you are alone, and no one willing to help you no espoinage ever over them. They and thie controller put me and them on espoinage, they the neighbours put me on espoinage 247.

    This is exegarated as nuclear bomb destroy cities, people will not think of this secret services as normal organisaiotns after it. They should terminated as nazis.

  • lior matatov

    They the neighbours every place animal nature of harassing disabled live alone all his dfays no mercy. This is barbaric animals behaviors are we in jungle.

  • lior matatov

    They wil cook and read mind of babiers and, of eldery who on wheel chars and legally blind people. All for cruelty of themserlf, and the criuelty in such degree they will thell the neighbours they destroy the life of the person as they as animalistic hunters will joion with show their joy they destroy the life of the person. Commit murder and horrible crime 247 never investigated arrested and get punishment is animalistic.

    • Paul Chach Mcarthy

      They killed a young child right next to where I was stood. Brain tumour. In the mall as if they were sending me a message.

  • lior matatov

    What USA did according to snowden ? py on both sides of conflict. This they do with me and neighbours no one can beleive anyone and they destroy any chance for normal behaviors. All of the attacke4rs who spy, both neighbours and operators in theior centers arrested and get punishment.

    They choose to murdur and from their fdace you see their joy in hunt and kill their neighour hear his thoughts while they kill their nneighbour.

  • lior matatov

    I live on kitchen 2 meter from the kitchen door to negibhours door so they many times as i ear or make food meter before me threaten me say things only spy can know about me this is done 247 365. This the degree of the murderers charactertes and attitude of neighbuors .

  • Sarah Mitchell

    Thank You so much for sharing your story, my husband and I are going through the same thing, word for word, I was overwhelmed as I read each word, it is us almost to the T. Our story started with these smart meters, we were suffering terribly with headaches, fatique ringing in the ears, insomnia, heart palpitations, dizziness, we would wake at the same time with these loud frequency’s, but had no idea where they were coming from, we live between 2 sets of cell-towers 1.5 miles and 2.5 miles distance, we purchased a meter and realized this was not it, we then went through the house looking for anything, we eliminated all unnecessary electrical devices lamps appliances, checked for dirty electric, and even went so far as to shut down the electric every night at the main. Then morning I walked out on my porch to hang some bird feeders and was shocked and stabbed with an electrical charge to the head, I called the power co, a crewman came out and said he would have to call a engineer, I asked him I have a analogue meter he said no I had a smart meter AMR I said it has a clock, he said they placed a transmitter into the device, I also asked him what was the box upon our utility pole he said it was a cell-tower he said that all these meters transmit utility use into this cell-tower transmitter, at that moment I knew my husband and I have been being exposed to pulsating radiation, from all my neighbors homes from the West through our home to the cell-tower transmitter on the East, right through our bedroom, I contacted the power company and demanded they remove all these devices, they said they would have to see if they could I contacted the Utility commission, and filed a informal complaint, the power company Ameren Missouri said pay us 522.00 and we will remove the meters, we agreed, but they waited almost another month. I ended up in a hospital with severe headaches nausea, vomiting, insomnia, for 5 days, when I left the hospital I was afraid to go back into my home we purchased a RV and we stayed there for a week, once the meters and transponder was gone things got better, we met with a group of people and gave our testimony and that’s when we became targeted by Ameren, it may have been all along, because 3 years prior to that we had spoke out about Ameren raising the electric rates, but now we know, and what you described in your account is what we are going through, we believe they are using satellites, and have help from the Military Industrial Complex, we have meters and have seen under telescope and binoculars 4 satellites at the same time right over our house, they also use cell-towers, and our neighbors smart meters, they also installed 5 transponders circling within 1/4 1/2 miles of our home, and when I test to see the direction it shows these transponders as the source, it’s unimaginable that our Government has turned on it’s citizens, we are all subject to this cruelty at any moment, our children will not have a fighting chance if we don’t demand justice and that these devices be removed, the corruption and tyranny taking place right now is unimaginable. I Pray that God will open the eyes of the people to see the depravity, what happened to humanity, human rights? how is it that the people of the USA are now being targeted like animals? this is inhumane. My Prayers are for the victims, and for all the children who have yet to know their future, we as a nation can not look the other way, and allow this to be acceptable our children will be enslaved, we can not under any circumstance allow that. Even if we have to fight to the death. Thank You Sarah MItchell

    • lolana

      I’ve read a lot about the smart meters and the reactions they are causing among people. EMFs do affect me and I do my best to avoid electronics when possible. One place I lived was literally buzzing with all this hidden energy..and I could not sleep at all in that place. Thankfully I moved. I’m sure you’ve found stopsmartmeters.com but, check it out. There is a town on the east coast, can’t remember where, but it’s a non-electronic town for people with emf sensitivity. Just a google search will find it.

  • S. Jill

    Remote neural monitoring does not require a chip. The tech is far beyond chips. Brain waves and verbal formations of mouth/jaw can be sensed, and recorded remotely. MIcrowave hearing (see Frey’s experiments) is also proven, and shows that radiofrequencies can send sounds that bypass the ear directly to the brain. Apparently, Robert Duncan and Dr. John Hall have examined the “brave, new” technology that most folks have no knowledge of currently.

    https://vahospitalannarbormichigan.wordpress.com/

  • TI in WI

    How can a person reach Ramola D.?
    Would send message rather than public comment (tho’ all that is typed is captured)

    • voiceofmillions

      Hi–My blog’s at everydayconcerned.net; email ecc@nym.hush.com. Thanks!–Ramola D

  • chen wolf

    GANG STALKING any serious global comparison – the State of Israel and its citizens worse this Nazi Germans from other countries

  • chen wolf

    GANG STALKING any serious global comparison – the State of Israel and its citizens worse this Nazi Germans from other countries

  • chen wolf

    All visible all !!!!!! Why do not retarded in you raid the building takes up all the equipment ??

    This is called Spy ???

    All the speaker @ !!!

    Crizzh machine automatically connected computer all day talking with neighbors about their speaker all Hilldim their spouses guests witnessed this monstrous I hear it

    All talk to them indifferent to situations in daily continuous abuse.

    All retard becoming a spy with it !!!

    Why not take Aotmn ????

  • chen wolf

    The State of Israel employs Nazi security service so they kill helpless just kill them in cold blood

  • chen wolf

    http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/Advice.php

    Mad scares me all apartments neighbors West puts abuse anyone in its path and then tell me the skull Quote neighbors were Russian mentally ill and neglected and bizarre waste of Israel I seem enemy “and they are just waiting for me to be angry with them say a few words and immediately ordered police to get me out of my breasts as they did to the Jews in the Holocaust.

    This monster psychopathic abuse and operates worldwide authorities have not put their hands on them and they go crazy and kill and harass another account without paying them about it nonstop for 50 years from the public coffers through the Ministry of Defense.

    They work every address I lived it moves people unhealthy and very dangerous abused helpless.

    Kiryat Yam buildings this crap country the most distressed buildings in the country, endangering neighbors paranoid and tolerant because of their socioeconomic status and all this trash out of me

  • chen wolf

    It’s horrible. I’m not exposing corruption and in fact should not be of interest to anyone and my feeling haunted police that protects these criminals are the establishment. Came a man behind my back all the neighbors and abusing me in my apartments Hugh and night nonstop years.

    I do not say hello stairwell and even avoided all contact with them and they abuse me without knowing me at all.

    How frightening entries and establishment people behave like this monsters everyday reality of my life can not be overestimated some of it bad.

  • chen wolf

    This scum neighboring apartment over me proper methods of intelligence agencies – Special facilities for the whole day over my head or Zzmi all the time like furniture moving left to right Pythia hours or Dofkiim it blows it blows like a psychopath method to beat me

    All as neighbors witnessed all this scene

    When I go to sleep it increases that he follows every thought and thought and every action I do

    It utilizes a housing shortage and using me as it attempts housing over fifties this dense residential

    Hell live in such a building

    Hell in a building like I do:

    http://pact.co.il/%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9F-%D7%A8%D7%9B%D7%91%D7%AA/

    This act of psychopathy Why did Afam Nowhere in the world do not perceive such a psychopath and put him in prison where he should be?

    He continues that way and accompanied me to the death of his goal I die it is not Isttzfk anything less than death in this psychopath and a murderer.

    http://www.gangstalkingwiki.com/

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/03/american-public-informs-president-obamas-commission-study-bioethical-issues-ongoing-non-consensual-human-experimentation-usa-today.html

  • chen wolf

    Security services in this country of Nazi behavior junk like NEW WORLD ORDER abroad

  • chen wolf

    If you want to know what the state deals with:

    How I got slamming doors and cabinets and furniture moving rhythmically estate bottomed apartments and Molly

    24 hours sounds of spitting in the face almost spitting in the face break me what you did with this experiment

    Pictures Animations marrow reports also know what you think in pictures

  • chen wolf

    They admire Nazis their attitude towards me is very racist, and the first thing they do when masses of people attacking me day and night to check what charges racist towards me can blame me as pursue new immigrants / poor / disabled and any minority group to present me as a seeker of endangered and minority groups when in fact it is the attitude that I was absorbing day night and Poor things and these “consciously cooperate with this persecution scenario.

    It makes me really thinking beleaguered force of unscrupulous manipulative psychopath and a liar and manipulating things well everything around me and the neighbors.

    There are human rights abuses mine as a scan of the thoughts and actions of my every moment Bctoc apartment by the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Freedom, at least 75% of the void, the United States have a Constitution also there that makes the Constitution useless has pictures of Obama dictator tearing the Constitution his speech to shreds in front of this crowd adequate description confirms what the government for 50 years.

    Their mentality is also 50 years ago it was made and developed during the Vietnam War, they did not have gotten on this issue and there is no requirement that the public will be changed not believe all the victims. They are atrocities that’s not at all how the balance of forces in their military acts like they are working with their victims.

    They are 100 times more powerful forces and blaming the victim for what I wrote just makes me rolling “Tell Grandma”.

    Here in 1967, it operates have no conscience and they increased it several times and it must include the victims will suffer even more.

    This asymmetric warfare not what they do against small armies like they do to their victims it probably messed up their mentality and the public.

    It has been hurting himself in public in this country made meaningless acts by unscrupulous individuals.

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

  • chen wolf

    World wide nazis empire

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Interesting

  • chen wolf

    I know suicide is not anyone else bussiness, but if I know I had to go to concentration camp, that is exactly be in this experiment when you not healthy, I prefer I have cyanide I could kill my self before. I don’t know how to do it.

  • chen wolf

    I wish in ISarel there will be organisation like dignitas. So i can ask help in killing my self and be sure i finish it. But this is religious state. dYu hae to be tupid to try kill yourself thinking chance of at least 1% failure. So I hope all of this end in next year and we will not be as people in concentration camp next decade.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    It is suffer of terminal disease, but no one will support suicide this case bwcause we have yaers and years before us (of suffering!). I don’t think dignitas will help this case. In the end you left alone, for years I thinking of suicide.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    This is modified version of nazism happen in Israel.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    I deal with such people

  • chen wolf

    Israely security sevices known to be disgusting they are those enter all the building and neighbours are the disgusting creatures serving this organisations.

  • chen wolf

    My gang stalking i the worst in the world, I know what I talk about since i scanned all the internet to fond worse case as my. Israel is worst gang stalkiong in the world. Animal people then cry about the holocoust.

  • chen wolf

    ISrael security services and citizens are whores, they call me whore (live alone 24 hours suffer abuser) violating human rights in horrible ways, I don’t know any gang stalking – which is severe human rightsa violation by itself, even more then regular V2K and RNM. Such people then cry to other government aboutt the holocoust, while in world wide coomparision the the biggest violators in human rights.

  • chen wolf

    ISrael nazi government and citizens was as weimer befire they nazis – this is their character. As mater of fact american also nazis but in israle I get very horrible version of gang stalker all around america I dont knwo a case as severe as myself. I can go on andf on, but know my case of gang stalking is most severe in the world =- I can’tr describe it exactly although I know any deyail since this so sick and have so many characteristics – most of it based na nazis in buoilding get directions enter to their own homw weapons do horrible human rights violdation – non stop to drive you crasy. In ISrael it much more resemble nazi germany then anyt other country.

  • chen wolf

    Gang stalking is much wose then RNM. The reason is much more dangerous to health. This attacks all around you 2 meters distance and less all day long. They simply destroy your residency. This is completely different story then RNM since it much worse violation of human rights – it not equal, at least RNM is equal between all the victims. The more you in dangerous state the more abilities to attck you – becuse the make use of any smaller distance you have from different people. You have to live in much worse conditions and this agencies fon’t care. Even in prisons they keep equal between prisoners, what not happen in gang stalking victims.. The violation of privacy isa not from satelllite distance but infornt your face and ears all day long. People all around you asbuse you and know you have disabilities. They encourage to hurt you and make you leave your place of living. Even RNM victims can’t accept my complaints about gang stalking, people who well know what is be victim of RNM. It make people all around you look like monsters. People all around you abuse you all day long. This destroy workplace and lace of living. It nuch more make disability and damage health then RNM. It much more make authorities look guilty in not help you. It is put a line that make it clear authorities complicit in murder you. It sick culture. I am killed in my oenwn apartment by all the neigbhours and their relatives live near them. The more you disabled the more gang stalkers sdistic with you. This state of israel authorithies as complete sadism make use of any opportunity theyt have make use of gang stalkers and their apartment to make you more disabled. They use anything possible. I moved 4 complete different building and different cities, no place anyone ask stop this abuse. This go on and on . The only possibility to gang stalkers leave this abuse is if they leave your place of living.

    No think of it it also violation of their own human rights – this agency workers come to their apaertment and they can’t say no, in reality de facto the never say no. It show they and authorities much more violent then any other state suuch things happening.

    There are ISraley monsters know how this gang stalking make me disabled but this psychopathic minded never don’t care they want make sure I will die from their attacks. Such people live and breath. Should be in jail.

    They pay police to not stop this abuse. This is “police state” as no law give them right to abuse and no court ever stop them so the rule of law not exist the “police state” want kill someone from any reason exist., and kill him with no court.

    This is what happened in nazi germany, not in communistic police states – they never have to use court to send any undesired to concentration camp. So this are as worse as nazis. They have the same mentality of nazis. And they use government policy to murdur inncoent people for any reason.

    They also classify their crimes and technologies, what de facto mae it unstopable. It completely undemocratic.

    They didn’t declassify this technologies and methods for 50 years. This is the worst problem exist right now in the world, much severe then any other problem.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_concentration_camps

    This article presents a partial list of the most prominent German Nazi concentration camps set up across Europe during World War II and during the Holocaust. A more complete list drawn up in 1967 by the German Ministry of Justice names about 1,200 camps and subcamps in countries occupied by Nazi Germany,[1] while the Jewish Virtual Library writes: “It is estimated that the Nazis established 15,000 camps in the occupied countries.”[2] The concentration camps are not to be confused with the extermination camps designed and built exclusively to kill prisoners on a massive scale immediately upon arrival.[3] The extermination camps of Operation Reinhard including Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka served as “death factories” in which German SS and police murdered nearly 2,700,000 Jews either by asphyxiation with poison gas or by shooting.[3] Meanwhile, the concentration camps listed herein served primarily as detention and slave labor exploitation centers. Most of them were destroyed by the Nazis in an attempt to hide the evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity; nevertheless tens of thousands of prisoners sent on death marches were liberated by the Allies afterward.[4]

    The concentration camps held large groups of prisoners without trial or judicial process. In modern historiography, the term refers to a place of systemic mistreatment, starvation, forced labour and murder. In 1933-1939, before the onset of war, most prisoners consisted of German Communists, Socialists, Social Democrats, Roma, Jehovah’s Witnesses, homosexuals, and persons accused of ‘asocial’ or socially ‘deviant’ behavior by the Nazis.[5] They have not been utilized to sustain the German war effort, unlike the prisoners of 42,500 camps and ghettos in which an estimated 15 to 20 million people were imprisoned and often pressed into slavery during the subsequent years,[6] according to research by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum conducted more recently.[6] Though the term ‘concentration camp’ is often used as a general term for all Nazi camps, there were in fact several types of concentration camps in the Nazi camp system during World War II. Holocaust scholars make a clear distinction between death camps and concentration camps which served a number of war related purposes including prison facilities, labor camps, prisoner of war camps, and transit camps among others.[7]

    The system of about 20,000 camps in Germany and Nazi-Occupied Europe played a pivotal role in sustaining the Nazi reign of terror economically.[5] Some of the data presented in this table originates from the monograph titled The War Against the Jews by Lucy Dawidowicz among similar others.[8]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination_camp

    The German extermination camps or death camps were designed and built by Nazi Germany during World War II (1939–45) to systematically kill millions, primarily by gassing, but also in mass executions and through extreme work under starvation conditions.[1][2]

    The idea of mass extermination with the use of stationary facilities built exclusively for that purpose was a result of earlier Nazi experimentation with the chemically manufactured poison gas during the secretive Action T4 euthanasia programme against Germans with mental and physical disabilities.[3][a] The technology was adapted, expanded and applied in wartime to unsuspecting victims of many ethnic and national groups; the Jews however were the primary targets accounting for over 90 percent of the extermination camp death toll. This genocide of the Jewish people of Europe was the Third Reich’s “Final Solution to the Jewish question”.[6] It is now collectively known as the Holocaust.[1][7]

    Extermination camps were also set up by the fascist Ustaše regime of the Independent State of Croatia allied with Germany, carrying out genocidal policy between 1941 and 1945 against Serbs, Jews, Roma and its political opponents.[8]

  • chen wolf

    The concentration camps held large groups of prisoners without trial or judicial process.

  • chen wolf

    The technology was adapted, expanded and applied in wartime to unsuspecting victims of many ethnic and national groups

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Institutional problems[edit]

    It is widely believed that the 1919 constitution had several weaknesses, making the eventual establishment of a dictatorship likely, but it is unknown whether a different constitution could have prevented the Third Reich. However, the 1949 West German constitution (the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany) is generally viewed as a strong response to these flaws.

    The institution of the Reichspräsident was frequently considered as an Ersatzkaiser (“substitute emperor”), an attempt to replace the emperors with a similarly strong institution meant to diminish party politics. Article 48 of the Constitution gave the President power to “take all necessary steps” if “public order and security are seriously disturbed or endangered”. Although it was intended as an emergency clause, it was often used before 1933 to issue decrees without the support of Parliament (see above) and also made Gleichschaltung easier.

    During the Weimar Republic, it was accepted that a law did not have to conform to the constitution as long as it had the support of two thirds of parliament, the same majority needed to change the constitution (verfassungsdurchbrechende Gesetze). That was a precedent for the Enabling Act of 1933. The Basic Law of 1949 requires an explicit change of the wording, and it prohibits abolishing the basic rights or the federal structure of the republic.

    The use of a proportional representation without a large thresholds meant a party with a small amount of support could gain entry into the Reichstag. That led to many small parties, some extremist, building political bases within the system. To counter the problem, the modern German Bundestag introduced a 5% threshold limit for a party to gain parliamentary representation. However, the Reichstag of the monarchy was fractioned to a similar degree even if it was elected by majority vote (under a two-round system). The republic fell not by the small parties but by the strength of the communists, conservatives and ultimately the national socialists.

    The Reichstag could remove the Reichskanzler from office even if it was unable to agree on a successor. The use of such a motion of no confidence meant that since 1932, that a government could not be held in office when the parliament came together. As a result, the 1949 Grundgesetz stipulates that a chancellor may not be removed by Parliament unless a successor is elected at the same time, known as a “constructive vote of no confidence”.

    The political parties started to have a role in creating a government only in October 1918. They had a massive inexperience.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Weimar Republic (German: Weimarer Republik [ˈvaɪmaʁɐ ʁepuˈbliːk] ( listen)) is an unofficial designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was the German Reich (Deutsches Reich), continuing the name from the pre-1918 German Empire.

    The republic was a semi-presidential representative democracy, which emerged in the aftermath of the German Revolution of 1918–19. A national assembly was convened in Weimar, where a new constitution for the German Reich was written, and adopted on 11 August 1919. In its fourteen years, the Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, including hyperinflation, political extremism (with paramilitaries – both left and right wing) and contentious relationships with the victors of the First World War. The people of Germany blamed the Weimar Republic rather than their wartime leaders for the country’s defeat and for the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, the Weimar Republic government successfully reformed the currency, unified tax policies, and organized the railway system. Weimar Germany eliminated most of the requirements of the Treaty of Versailles; it never completely met its disarmament requirements, and eventually paid only a small portion of the war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan).[4] Under the Locarno Treaties, Germany accepted the western borders of the republic, but continued to dispute the Eastern border.

    From 1930 onwards President Hindenburg used emergency powers to back Chancellors Heinrich Brüning, Franz von Papen and General Kurt von Schleicher. The Great Depression, worsened by Brüning’s policy of deflation, led to a surge in unemployment.[5] In 1933 Adolf Hitler became the new Chancellor of a coalition government, and Nazis held two out of the remaining ten cabinet seats. Von Papen as Vice Chancellor was intended to be the “éminence grise” who would keep Hitler under control, using his close personal connection to Hindenburg. Within months, however, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act of 1933 had brought about a state of emergency and wiped out constitutional civil liberties. Hitler’s seizure of power (Machtergreifung) allowed him to govern by decree without the involvement of the legislature. These events brought the Weimar Republic to an end, as democracy collapsed and a single-party state was created. The end of the Weimar Republic marked the beginning of Nazi Germany.

    Even so, German Foreign Office official Harry Graf Kessler had predicted as early as February 1919 that the Republic was doomed. “The paradox”, he wrote, “by which a Social Democratic Government allows itself and the capitalist cash-boxes to be defended by royalist officers and unemployed on the dole is altogether too crazy.”[6]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation

    Who didn’t punished and put in jail the people behind past experiments now get this version of 50 years Nazis. It as let Hitler rule.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Role of individuals[edit]

    Brüning’s economic policy from 1930 to 1932 has been the subject of much debate. It caused many Germans to identify the Republic with cuts in social spending and extremely liberal economics. Whether there were alternatives to this policy during the Great Depression is an open question.

    Paul von Hindenburg became Reichspräsident in 1925. As he was an old style monarchist conservative, he had little love lost for the Republic, but for the most part, he formally acted within the bounds of the constitution, however he ultimately – on the advice of his son and others close to him – appointed Hitler chancellor thereby effectively ending the Republic.

  • chen wolf

    You can’t say this nazis not racist as this is war. This another vesion of Nazis. What they do with us is what happens in wars. The only difference there is no every day reports on newws papers about what this monsters do.

  • chen wolf

    The voices are of monster resemble nazis.

  • chen wolf

    Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics, such as the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been performed by countries including Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, North Korea, the United States, and the Soviet Union. Examples include Project MKUltra, Unit 731, and the experiments of Josef Mengele.

    The Declaration of Helsinki, developed by the World Medical Association (WMA), is widely regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics.[1][2][3]

    It show here that US not need war to do crimes against humanity world wide. With their famous experiments. They do it as they breath. They should pay and do work as nazis. They should be ashamed of their nazis behavior. They should be ashamed they make other countries do artocities against their citizens. Their behavior is destroy the world.

  • chen wolf

    Can you imagine germany of today export such experiments ?Shame ? since when americans knwo this term. They behavior of retardid, not unclassify thids for 50 years.

  • chen wolf

    This is charactersic of americans, be proud of crimes the government do. Because of this 50 years not unclassify this. This is crimes against humanity not less severe then of nazis. They export their crimes to another territories what make them nazis.

  • chen wolf

    It show the criminal mentality of US government, and becuse they control all governments in the world no one can say no to their evil experiments.

  • chen wolf

    Compare between this two regime :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Kucinich

    Space Preservation Act of 2001

    Kucinich introduced the first Space Preservation Act, on October 2, 2001, with no cosponsors. The bill was designed to “preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind.” The bill was referred to the House Science, the House Armed Services, and the House International Relations committees. The bill died in committee (April 9, 2002) because of an unfavorable executive comment received from the Department of Defense.[112]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Role of individuals[edit]

    Brüning’s economic policy from 1930 to 1932 has been the subject of much debate. It caused many Germans to identify the Republic with cuts in social spending and extremely liberal economics. Whether there were alternatives to this policy during the Great Depression is an open question.

    Paul von Hindenburg became Reichspräsident in 1925. As he was an old style monarchist conservative, he had little love lost for the Republic, but for the most part, he formally acted within the bounds of the constitution, however he ultimately – on the advice of his son and others close to him – appointed Hitler chancellor thereby effectively ending the Republic.

  • chen wolf

    http://www.mako.co.il/hix-history/conspiracy-theories/Article-02770d2347e8f41006.htm

    Congressman accidentally revealed the truth

    In 2001, proponents of the theory lost it when Congress discusses the Law for the preservation Space “which prohibit the use of space-based weapons. Confusing term became even more puzzling when Republican Congressman Dennis Kosinitz, argued that the jet trails are on the list of toxic weapons has already used them government and candidates for the prohibition of the use. This would have been an incontrovertible proof of current use of jet trails as a weapon if Kosinitz not been considered a laughing stock among his colleagues and also ends are also counted alien weapons, tectonics and sensory. The bill never came out of the doors of the Council.

  • chen wolf

    They use NASA grade space wepon in all flats around me direct conversation via automatic motionless robot talk to them according to my every movemt. This are super psychopath dangerous peple with no emotions, they make you horrible suffer 247 and continue as nothng include not shame show themself before neighbrours

  • chen wolf

    USA gangsters are as naizs kill russians to get land for agriculture this their murdurs experiments you can kill people for reasons of their war machine. This are psychopath control there 50 years already and not cleannng this psychopath from government. This government of USA is NAZI NAZI worldwide.

  • chen wolf

    THis government of USA is NAZI with NAZI idea you kill to get what you get and not give anything as two sides chess mate. They are so ppoor they kill people for DoD they are retardid , dangerous, criminals world wide mafia.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_human_experimentation

    Nazi human experimentation was a series of medical experiments on large numbers of prisoners, including children, by Nazi Germany in its concentration camps mainly in the early 1940s, during World War II and the Holocaust. Chief target populations included Romani, Sinti, ethnic Poles, Soviet POWs, disabled Germans, and most prominently of all Jews from across Europe.

    Nazi Physicians and their assistants forced prisoners into participating; they did not willingly volunteer and no consent was given for the procedures. Typically, the experiments resulted in death, trauma, disfigurement or permanent disability, and as such are considered as examples of medical torture.

    At Auschwitz and other camps, under the direction of Eduard Wirths, selected inmates were subjected to various hazardous experiments that were designed to help German military personnel in combat situations, develop new weapons, aid in the recovery of military personnel who had been injured, and to advance the Nazi racial ideology.[1] Aribert Heim conducted similar medical experiments at Mauthausen. Carl Værnet is known to have conducted experiments on homosexual prisoners in attempts to “cure” homosexuality.

    After the war, these crimes were tried at what became known as the Doctors’ Trial, and revulsion at the abuses perpetrated led to the development of the Nuremberg Code of medical ethics.

  • chen wolf

    designed to help German military personnel in combat situations, develop new weapons, aid in the recovery of military personnel who had been injured, and to advance the Nazi racial ideology

  • chen wolf

    Same in USA war machine

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum

    Lebensraum (German pronunciation: [ˈleːbənsˌʁaʊm] ( listen), “living space”) refers to conceptions and policies of a form of settler colonialism connected with agrarianism that existed in Germany from the 1890s to the 1940s. One variant of this policy was supported by the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany.[2]

    Originally a biology term for “habitat”, the publicists for the German Empire (1871–1918) introduced Lebensraum as a concept of nationalism that became a geopolitical goal of Imperial Germany in the First World War (1914–1918), as the Septemberprogramm (1914).[3] The British blockade of trade to Germany during World War I caused food shortages in Germany and resources from Germany’s African colonies were unable to help; this caused support to rise during the war for a Lebensraum that would expand Germany eastward into Russia to gain control of resources to stop the food shortages.[4]

    Lebensraum was an ideological element of Nazism, which advocated Germany’s territorial expansion into Eastern Europe, justified by the need for agricultural land in order to maintain the town-and-country balance upon which depended the moral health of the German people.[5] In practice, during the war, the Nazi policy Generalplan Ost (Master Plan East) was to kill, deport, or enslave the Polish, Ukrainian, Russian and other Slavic populations and other peoples living there considered racially inferior to the Germans and to repopulate Eastern Europe with Germanic people to achieve Lebensraum.[6][7][8] The populations of cities were to be exterminated by starvation, thus creating an agricultural surplus that would feed Germany, and thereby allow political replacement by and re-population with a German upper class.[6] The eugenics of Lebensraum explicitly assumed the racial superiority of Germans as an Aryan master race (Herrenvolk), who, by virtue of their superiority (physical, mental, genetic) had the right to displace any people they deemed to be Untermenschen (subhumans) of inferior racial stock.[9]

  • chen wolf

    This USA givernment are worst monsters, they kill people in such experiments as if their own life depend on it, as they are starved if not kill and genocide poepl with this experiments. For the criminal USA government kill peolpe in such experiments is just a game, they behavior as their own life depend on kill innocent people for their experiments world wide. They are monster in government.

  • chen wolf

    the “people” support such things in two regimes, which show anyone almost cosidered as nazi for targeted individuals. They laugh from our suffer and have Nazi Dod with privilege which lok like a pig.

    Congressman accidentally revealed the truth

    In 2001, proponents of the theory lost it when Congress discusses the Law for the preservation Space “which prohibit the use of space-based weapons. Confusing term became even more puzzling when Republican Congressman Dennis Kosinitz, argued that the jet trails are on the list of toxic weapons has already used them government and candidates for the prohibition of the use. This would have been an incontrovertible proof of current use of jet trails as a weapon if Kosinitz not been considered a laughing stock among his colleagues and also ends are also counted alien weapons, tectonics and sensory. The bill never came out of the doors of the Council.

  • chen wolf

    The “people” support hiler and dictatorship as they support such experiments and nazis, if it not was the reality they asked the experiments to be stopped.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volk_(German_word)

    In German, the word Volk may mean folk (simple people), people in the ethnic sense, and nation.[citation needed]

    Volk is commonly used as the first, determining part (head) of compound nouns such as Volksentscheid (plebiscite, literally “decision of/by the people”) or Völkerbund (League of Nations), or the car manufacturer Volkswagen (literally, “people’s car”).

    Contents [hide]

    1 19th century and early 20th century

    2 Nazi era

    3 Today

    4 Cognates in other Germanic language

    5 English word folk

    6 See also

    7 Notes

    8 References

    19th century and early 20th century[edit]

    Further information: German tribes and Stem duchy

    A number of völkisch movements existed prior to World War I. Combining interest in folklore, ecology, occultism and romanticism with ethnic nationalism, their ideologies were a strong influence on the Nazi party, which itself was inspired by Adolf Hitler’s membership of the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (German Workers’ Party), even though Hitler in Mein Kampf himself denounced usage of the word völkisch as he considered it too vague as to carry any recognizable meaning due to former over-use. Today, the term völkisch is largely restricted to historical contexts describing the closing 19th century and early 20th century up to Hitler’s seize of power in 1933, especially during the years of the Weimar Republic.

    Nazi era[edit]

    During the years of the Third Reich, the term Volk became heavily used in nationalistic political slogans, particularly in slogans such as Volk ohne Raum — “(a) people without space” or Völkischer Beobachter (“popular observer”), an NSDAP party newspaper. Also the political slogan Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer (“One nation, one empire, one leader”); the compound word Herrenvolk, translated as “master race”; and the term Volksgemeinschaft.

    Even though Hitler, in his book Mein Kampf often erroneously applied specific biological and zoological terms such as race, species, and others, the Nazi-era use of Volk could not, depending on context, be interpreted as “race”, “Germanic”, or “European.” In Nazi propaganda, several peoples made up a race, so these two terms did not denote the same thing during the Nazi years. The German people were considered part of the Germanic race which officially included the Scandinavians, the English, and the Dutch as well, so Volk did not equal German either. Nazi-era publications on pre-history only differed whether their Germanic race equalled the Indo-European race or the Germanic race itself was part of a family of Indo-European races, since indogermanisch is the common German term for Indo-European. Thus the term Volk, in the vision of Nazis, referred to the entirety of German nation.[1]

    Today[edit]

    Because Volk is the generic German word for “people” in the ethnic sense today as well as for “people entitled to vote” (Wahlvolk), its use does not necessarily denote any particular political views in post-1945 Germany. However, because of its past, the word is rarely used with Bevölkerung (“population”) serving as a substitute. “Wir sind das Volk!” (“We are the people!”) was a chant used by the Monday demonstrators during the peaceful demonstrations of 1989/1990 to end the DDR and bring down the Berlin Wall.

    Cognates in other Germanic language[edit]

    Folk has a cognate in almost every other Germanic language, all deriving from Proto-Germanic *fulka, some are listed below:

    Danish – folk

    Dutch – volk

    Afrikaans – volk

    Swedish – folk

    Frisian – folk

    Norwegian – folk

    Icelandic – fólk

    Faroese – fólk

    German – Volk

    Scots – fowk

    Yiddish – folk – פֿאָלק

    English – folk

    In all Germanic languages, the variant of “folk” means “people” or something related to the people.

    The English word “folk” is derived from a Germanic noun, *fulka meaning “people” or “army” (i.e. a crowd as opposed to “a people” in a more abstract sense of clan or tribe). The English word folk has cognates in most of the other Germanic languages. Folk may be a Germanic root that is unique to the Germanic languages, although Latin vulgus, “the common people”, has been suggested as a possible cognate.[2]

    English word folk[edit]

    The Modern English word folk, derives from Old English folc meaning “common people”, “men”, “tribe” or “multitude”. The Old English noun itself came from Proto-Germanic *fulka which perhaps originally referred to a “host of warriors”. Compare Old Norse folk meaning “people” but more so “army” or “detachment”, German Gefolge (“retinue”), and Lithuanian pulkas meaning “crowd”. The latter is considered to be an early Lithuanian loanword from Germanic origin, cf. Belarusian полк – połk meaning regiment and German Pulk for a group of people standing together.

    The word became colloquialized (usually in the plural folks) in English in the sense “people”, and was considered inelegant by the beginning of the 19th century. It re-entered academic English through the invention of the word folklore in 1846 by the antiquarian William J. Thoms (1803–85) as an Anglo-Saxonism. This word revived folk in a modern sense of “of the common people, whose culture is handed down orally”, and opened up a flood of compound formations, e.g. folk art (1921), folk-hero (1899), folk-medicine (1898), folk-tale (1891), folk-song (1847), folk-dance (1912). Folk-music is from 1889; in reference to the branch of modern popular music (associated with Greenwich Village in New York City) here it dates from 1958.

  • chen wolf

    19th century and early 20th century[edit]

    Further information: German tribes and Stem duchy

    A number of völkisch movements existed prior to World War I. Combining interest in folklore, ecology, occultism and romanticism with ethnic nationalism, their ideologies were a strong influence on the Nazi party, which itself was inspired by Adolf Hitler’s membership of the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (German Workers’ Party), even though Hitler in Mein Kampf himself denounced usage of the word völkisch as he considered it too vague as to carry any recognizable meaning due to former over-use. Today, the term völkisch is largely restricted to historical contexts describing the closing 19th century and early 20th century up to Hitler’s seize of power in 1933, especially during the years of the Weimar Republic.

  • chen wolf

    The ISarely are NAZIS as in holocosut. This people citizens and leaders support nazis. they cold hearted all day long abuse and torture me with repeptitive sounds constant non stop from any near apartmment they not care about suffering and bevior of naizs from 1930′

  • chen wolf

    Noam Chomsky: Israeli Apartheid ‘Much Worse’ Than South Africa

    Famous American linguist Noam Chomsky has described the actions of the Israeli occupation in Palestine as “worse than South African apartheid”.

    By IMEMC News | August 25, 2015

    TwitterFacebookReddit

    Google+

    “In the Occupied Territories, what Israel is doing is much worse than apartheid,” Chomsky says, according to Days of Palestine. “To call it apartheid is a gift to Israel, at least if by ‘apartheid’ you mean South African-style apartheid.

    “What is happening in the Occupied Territories is much worse. There is a crucial difference. The South African Nationalists needed the black population. That was their workforce…

    “The Israeli relationship to the Palestinians in the Occupied Territories is totally different. They just do not want them. They want them out, or at least in prison.”

    official MintPress sponsor

    He described listening to the American mainstream media, such as CBS, like listening directly to the Israeli propaganda agencies. “It is a shameful moment for US media when it insists on being subservient to the grotesque propaganda agencies of a violent, aggressive state [Israel],” he said.

    Chomsky accused the United States of continuing to provide the decisive support for the [Israeli] atrocities against the Palestinians.

    “When what is called Israeli jet planes bomb defenceless targets in Gaza, that is US jet planes with Israeli pilots,” he said. “And the same with the high-tech munition and so on and so forth. So this is, again, sadism masked as compassion. Those are the actions.”

    In a long interview with Democracy now, Chomsky insisted that the US is a violent state and is it exporting violence to other countries like the Israeli occupation.

  • chen wolf

    German protestors dare to compare Israelis to Nazis

    Jan 6, 2008

    Neil Clark

    European guilt about the Holocaust is receding in the face of Israeli aggresssion – and there’s nothing anti-semitic about it

    FACEBOOK

    TWITTER

    GOOGLE+

    LINKEDIN

    EMAIL

    As a Jew, it’s very moving to see so many people who are so outraged at Israel’s actions,” said the comedian Alexei Sayle after Saturday’s 10,000-strong anti-war protest in London. He would certainly be moved by the reaction of the people of Europe to Israel’s military aggression.

    Last weekend thousands of Europeans took part in anti-Israel demonstrations. In Paris, around 25,0000 demonstrators, many wearing Palestinian headscarves, marched through the city chanting slogans such as “Israel killers” and “We are all Palestinians”. In the Netherlands, thousands marched through Amsterdam, criticising the Israeli attacks and the Dutch government’s failure to condemn them. One banner declared: “Anne Frank is turning in her grave. Oh Israel!”

    Protestors have not been afraid to compare Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians to the Nazis’ treatment of the Jews. In Stockholm, protestors set fire to an Israeli flag painted with a swastika. In Madrid more than 1,000 people marched, many carrying banners equating Zionism with Nazism. One banner declared: “This is not a war but a genocide”.

    Some of the biggest demonstrations were in countries where for historical reasons, people have previously felt particularly inhibited about expressing criticism of the Jewish state. In Salzburg in Austria around 2,500 people took to the streets. In Germany there were sizeable demonstrations in several cities: around 10,000 people protested in Frankfurt, a further 7,000 in Berlin. In Dusseldorf protestors held up a doll representing a bleeding baby with the placard “Made in Israel”.

    The significance of these protests cannot be underestimated. For most of the first 60 years of its existence, Israel got an easy ride from Europeans due to European guilt over the Holocaust. But as revulsion over Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians grows, the ‘Holocaust card’ – long used by Zionists in order to stifle legitimate debate over Israel’s actions – no longer has the same impact.

    Zionists will, of course, claim that the growing European opposition to Israel is a sign that the continent is reverting to anti-semitism; the staunchly pro-Israel commentator Melanie Phillips has already dismissed the anti-Israel protestors as “leftists, Jew-haters, Muslims and useful idiots”.

    But the most striking thing about the demonstrations to date has been the absence of anti-semitism. Anger is rising across Europe, but it is anger directed against the state of Israel – not Jews in general; in fact in some demonstrations, such as the one in London, Jewish groups themselves took part.

    “Everybody is somebody’s Jew. And the Palestinians are the Jews of the Israelis”, the Jewish writer and holocaust survivor Primo Levi once famously remarked. It seems an increasing number of people across Europe are coming to the same conclusion.

  • chen wolf

    Gang stalking is kill you in your residence

  • chen wolf

    They operate robots do bang bang as construction site 247 no one ever stop it. From the start isee such things are death sentence put robot in room you have no key never stop. It kill you with a gun near apartment. It sadistic bag-bang non stop as weapon on purpose it make me sick I can’t stpo it for years.
    PEople behind it not care suufer they are animals ssadistics non huan agencies and emplyuees

  • chen wolf

    They can explode nonmn there easy for anyone I canme talk wi th SS social worker I heared on tape bang bang as wepon robot no reason but sadism 10 years after never stpo. How i can stop this sadism it is killing me in all day long from any side near my own redsidence.

  • chen wolf

    So the voices in head it non stop electrify youtr brain as numbers in cocnentration camps. The people government behind this are nazis this is crime against humanity

  • chen wolf

    Its ultimate goal is you suffer horrible torture non stpo by robot toemrnt you no second of not suffer live yur life on constant suffer this are nazis sadistic killing in concentration camp, they think they abuse not humans but animals

  • chen wolf

    USA think you are aniomal not human they never think of stop the suffer and laugh in your face for your suffer who eeer developed this thing is USA nazi so their friends israel nazi pigs

  • chen wolf

    People are angels, I thought such thing aarona elxis shhoot is neighbours once per week. This what I shouold do

  • chen wolf

    THey deserve nothing more then sdhhoot them, all to death.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicherheitsdienst

    Sicherheitsdienst (English: Security Service), full title Sicherheitsdienst des Reichsführers-SS (English: Security Service of the Reichsführer-SS), or SD, was the intelligence agency of the SS and the Nazi Party in Nazi Germany. The organization was the first Nazi Party intelligence organization to be established and was considered a sister organization with the Gestapo, which the SS had infiltrated heavily after 1934. Between 1933 and 1939, the SD was administered as an independent SS office, after which it was transferred to the authority of the Reich Main Security Office (Reichssicherheitshauptamt; RSHA), as one of its seven departments/offices.[2] Its first director, Reinhard Heydrich, intended for the SD to bring every single individual within the Third Reich’s reach under “continuous supervision.”[3]

    Following Germany’s defeat in World War II, the SD was declared a criminal organisation at the Nuremberg Trials, along with the rest of Heydrich’s RSHA (including the Gestapo) both individually and as branches of the SS in the collective.[4] Heydrich’s successor, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, was sentenced to death for war crimes at the Nuremberg Tribunals and hanged in 1946.[5]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment

    Depression-era U.S. poster advocating early syphilis treatment. Although treatments were available, participants in the study did not receive them.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment

    The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male, also known as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study or Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (“Tuskegee” = /tʌsˈkiːɡiː/)[1] was an infamous clinical study conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the U.S. Public Health Service studying the natural progression of untreated syphilis in rural African-American men in Alabama under the guise of receiving free health care from the United States government.[1]

    The Public Health Service started working on this study in 1932 during the Great Depression, in collaboration with Tuskegee University, a historically black college in Alabama. Investigators enrolled in the study a total of 600 impoverished, African American sharecroppers from Macon County, Alabama. Of these men, 399 had previously contracted syphilis before the study began, and 201[2] did not have the disease. The men were given free medical care, meals, and free burial insurance for participating in the study. After funding for treatment was lost, the study was continued without informing the men they would never be treated. None of the men infected were ever told they had the disease, and none were treated with penicillin even after the antibiotic became proven for the treatment of syphilis. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the men were told they were being treated for “bad blood”, a local term for various illnesses that include syphilis, anemia, and fatigue.

    The 40-year study was controversial for reasons related to ethical standards because researchers knowingly failed to treat patients appropriately after the 1940s validation of penicillin as an effective cure for the disease they were studying. Revelation in 1972 of study failures by a whistleblower led to major changes in U.S. law and regulation on the protection of participants in clinical studies. Now studies require informed consent,[3] communication of diagnosis, and accurate reporting of test results.[4]

    By 1947, penicillin had become the standard treatment for syphilis. Choices available to the doctors involved in the study might have included treating all syphilitic subjects and closing the study, or splitting off a control group for testing with penicillin. Instead, the Tuskegee scientists continued the study without treating any participants; they withheld penicillin and information about it from the patients. In addition, scientists prevented participants from accessing syphilis treatment programs available to other residents in the area.[5] The study continued, under numerous US Public Health Service supervisors, until 1972, when a leak to the press resulted in its termination on November 16 of that year.[6] The victims of the study, all African American, included numerous men who died of syphilis, 40 wives who contracted the disease, and 19 children born with congenital syphilis.

    The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, cited as “arguably the most infamous biomedical research study in U.S. history”,[7] led to the 1979 Belmont Report and the establishment of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).[8] It also led to federal laws and regulations requiring Institutional Review Boards for the protection of human subjects in studies involving them. The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) manages this responsibility within the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).[9]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://wariscrime.com/new/the-13-most-evil-us-government-human-experiments/

    The U.S. Government has been caught conducting an insane amount of vile, inhumane and grisly experiments on humans without their consent and often without their knowledge. So in light of recent news of the U.S. infecting Guatemalans with STDs, here are the 13 most evil, for lack of a better word, cases of human-testing as conducted by the United States of America.

    Get ready to become one of those conspiracy theory nuts, because after this list, you will never fully trust your government again.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel

    The Schutzstaffel (SS; also stylized as Runic “ᛋᛋ” with Armanen runes; German pronunciation: [ˈʃʊtsˌʃtafəl] ( listen); literally “Protection Squadron”) was a major paramilitary organization under Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (NSDAP; Nazi Party) in Nazi Germany. It began with a small guard unit known as the Saal-Schutz (Hall-Protection) made up of NSDAP volunteers to provide security for party meetings in Munich. In 1925, Heinrich Himmler joined the unit, which had by then been reformed and given its final name. Under his direction (1929–45), it grew from a small paramilitary formation to one of the most powerful organizations in Nazi Germany. From 1929 until the regime’s collapse in 1945, the SS was the foremost agency of surveillance and terror within Germany and German-occupied Europe.

    The two main constituent groups were the Allgemeine SS (General SS) and Waffen-SS (Armed SS). The Allgemeine SS was responsible for enforcing the racial policy of Nazi Germany and general policing, whereas the Waffen-SS consisted of combat units of troops within Nazi Germany’s military. A third component of the SS, the SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), ran the concentration camps and extermination camps. Additional subdivisions of the SS included the Gestapo and the Sicherheitsdienst (SD) organizations. They were tasked with the detection of actual or potential enemies of the Nazi state, the neutralization of any opposition, policing the German people for their commitment to Nazi ideology, and providing domestic and foreign intelligence.

    The SS was the organization most responsible for the genocidal killing of an estimated 5.5 to 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. Members of all of its branches committed war crimes and crimes against humanity during World War II (1939–45). The SS was also involved in commercial enterprises and exploited concentration camp inmates as slave labor. After Nazi Germany’s defeat, the SS and the NSDAP were judged by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg to be criminal organizations. Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the highest-ranking surviving SS officer, was found guilty of crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg trials and hanged in 1946.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

    Unethical human experimentation in the United States describes numerous experiments performed on human test subjects in the United States that have been considered unethical, and were often performed illegally, without the knowledge, consent, or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have occurred throughout American history, but particularly in the 20th century.

    The experiments include: the deliberate infection of people with deadly or debilitating diseases, exposure of people to biological and chemical weapons, human radiation experiments, injection of people with toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests involving mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of others. Many of these tests were performed on children,[1] the sick, and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of “medical treatment”. In many of the studies, a large portion of the subjects were poor, racial minorities, or prisoners.

    Funding for many of the experiments was provided by United States government, especially the United States military, Central Intelligence Agency, or private corporations involved with military activities. The human research programs were usually highly secretive, and in many cases information about them was not released until many years after the studies had been performed.

    The ethical, professional, and legal implications of this in the United States medical and scientific community were quite significant, and led to many institutions and policies that attempted to ensure that future human subject research in the United States would be ethical and legal. Public outrage in the late 20th century over the discovery of government experiments on human subjects led to numerous congressional investigations and hearings, including the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission, both of 1975 and the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, among others.

    A subject of the Tuskegee syphilis experiment has his blood drawn, c. 1953

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States

    Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population[2][3] played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States prior to its involvement in World War II.[4]

    Eugenics was practised in the United States many years before eugenics programs in Nazi Germany[5] and U.S. programs provided much of the inspiration for the latter.[6][7][8] Stefan Kühl has documented the consensus between Nazi race policies and those of eugenicists in other countries, including the United States, and points out that eugenicists understood Nazi policies and measures as the realization of their goals and demands.[9]

    During the Progressive Era of the late 19th and early 20th century, eugenics was considered[by whom?] a method of preserving and improving the dominant groups in the population; it is now generally associated with racist and nativist elements[citation needed] (as the movement was to some extent a reaction to a change in emigration from Europe) rather than

    Winning family of a Fitter Family contest stand outside of the Eugenics Building [1] (where contestants register) at the Kansas Free Fair, in Topeka, KS.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States

    Unethical human experimentation in the United States describes numerous experiments performed on human test subjects in the United States that have been considered unethical, and were often performed illegally, without the knowledge, consent, or informed consent of the test subjects. Such tests have occurred throughout American history, but particularly in the 20th century.

    The experiments include: the deliberate infection of people with deadly or debilitating diseases, exposure of people to biological and chemical weapons, human radiation experiments, injection of people with toxic and radioactive chemicals, surgical experiments, interrogation and torture experiments, tests involving mind-altering substances, and a wide variety of others. Many of these tests were performed on children,[1] the sick, and mentally disabled individuals, often under the guise of “medical treatment”. In many of the studies, a large portion of the subjects were poor, racial minorities, or prisoners.

    Funding for many of the experiments was provided by United States government, especially the United States military, Central Intelligence Agency, or private corporations involved with military activities. The human research programs were usually highly secretive, and in many cases information about them was not released until many years after the studies had been performed.

    The ethical, professional, and legal implications of this in the United States medical and scientific community were quite significant, and led to many institutions and policies that attempted to ensure that future human subject research in the United States would be ethical and legal. Public outrage in the late 20th century over the discovery of government experiments on human subjects led to numerous congressional investigations and hearings, including the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission, both of 1975 and the 1994 Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, among others.

  • chen wolf

    http://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/Law01/184_001.htm

    The Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty

    Laws constitution – the Basic Laws

    Table of Contents

    Article 1

    Basic Principles

    Go

    2

    Article 1A

    purpose

    Go

    2

    Section 2

    Keeping life in the body, and honor

    Go

    2

    Section 3

    Protection of property

    Go

    2

    Section 4

    Protection of life, body and dignity

    Go

    2

    Section 5

    Freedom

    Go

    2

    Article 6

    Exit and entering Israel

    Go

    2

    Article 7

    Privacy and confidentiality

    Go

    2

    Article 8

    Infringement

    Go

    2

    Article 9

    Reservation regarding security forces

    Go

    2

    Article 10

    Compliance with laws

    Go

    2

    Article 11

    incidence

    Go

    2

    Article 12

    Stability Law

    Go

    2

    The Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty *

    Basic Principles

    1. Fundamental human rights in Israel are founded upon recognition of the value of human life, the sanctity of life and human freedom, and respected the spirit of the principles in the Declaration of the State of Israel.

    purpose

    1a. This Basic Law, aims to protect human dignity and liberty, in order to establish in a Basic Law the values ​​of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.

    Keeping life in the body, and honor

    2. There is no violation of the life, body or dignity of any person as such.

    Protection of property

    3. Do not damage the person’s property.

    Protection of life, body and dignity

    4. Everyone has the right to defend his life, body and dignity.

    Freedom

    5. Do not be taken or restriction of the liberty of a person by imprisonment, arrest, extradition or otherwise.

    Exit and entering Israel

    6. (a) Every person is free to leave the country.

    (B) every Israeli citizen that is out to Israel is entitled to enter Israel.

    Privacy and confidentiality

    7. (a) Every person is entitled to their privacy.

    (B) entry into the private premises of a person without his consent.

    (C) No search a person’s territory, in the body or belongings.

    (D) does not violate the confidentiality of a person, writings or recordings.

    Infringement

    8. There is no violation of rights under this Basic Law, but the law befitting the values ​​of the State of Israel, enacted for a proper purpose, and to an extent no greater than is required, or by such a law express authorization.

    Reservation regarding security forces

    9. There is no restriction of rights under this Basic Law, persons serving in the Israel Defense Forces, the Israel Police, the Prisons Service and other defense organizations of the country, and there is no virtue, but according to the law and to an extent no greater than is required by the nature and character of the service.

    Compliance with laws

    10. The Basic Law does this affect the validity of the law that existed prior to the commencement of the Basic Law.

    incidence

    11. All governmental authorities must respect the rights under this Basic Law.

    Stability Law

    12. The power of the emergency regulations change this Basic Law, suspended or made subject to conditions; However, when a state of emergency in effect a declaration under section 9 of Ordinance Law and Administration, 1948, is allowed to install emergency regulations by virtue of said section to deny or restrict rights under this Basic Law, provided the denial or restriction shall and for a proper purpose and the extent no greater than required.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignity

    Moral, ethical, legal, and political discussions use the concept of dignity to express the idea that a being has an innate right to be valued, respected, and to receive ethical treatment. In the modern context dignity can function as an extension of the Enlightenment-era concepts of inherent, inalienable rights. English-speakers often use the word “dignity” in proscriptive and cautionary ways: for example in politics it can be used to critique the treatment of oppressed and vulnerable groups and peoples, but it has also been applied to cultures and sub-cultures, to religious beliefs and ideals, to animals used for food or research, and to plants. “Dignity” also has descriptive meanings pertaining to human worth. In general, the term has various functions and meanings depending on how the term is used and on the context.[1]

    The English word “dignity”, attested from the early 13th century, comes from Latin dignitas (worthiness)[2] by way of French dignité.[3] In ordinary modern usage it denotes “respect” and “status”, and it is often used to suggest that someone is not receiving a proper degree of respect, or even that they are failing to treat themselves with proper self-respect. There is also a long history of special philosophical use of this term. However, it is rarely defined outright in political, legal, and scientific discussions. International proclamations have thus far left dignity undefined,[4][5] and scientific commentators, such as those arguing against genetic research and algeny, cite dignity as a reason but are ambiguous about its application.[6]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignitas_(assisted_dying_organisation)

    Dignitas is a Swiss group helping those with terminal illness and severe physical and mental illnesses to die, assisted by qualified doctors and nurses. They have helped over 1,000 people die in clinics in Zürich. Additionally, they provide assisted suicide for people provided that they are of sound judgement and submit to an in-depth medical report prepared by a psychiatrist that establishes the patient’s condition, as required by Swiss courts.[1]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia

    Euthanasia (from Greek: εὐθανασία; “good death”: εὖ, eu; “well” or “good” – θάνατος, thanatos; “death”) is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.[1]

    There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as “a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering”.[2] In the Netherlands and Flanders, euthanasia is understood as “termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient”.[3]

    Euthanasia is categorized in different ways, which include voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is legal in some countries. Non-voluntary euthanasia (patient’s consent unavailable) is illegal in all countries. Involuntary euthanasia (without asking consent or against the patient’s will) is also illegal in all countries and is usually considered murder.[4] As of 2006, euthanasia is the most active area of research in contemporary bioethics.[5]

    In some countries there is a divisive public controversy over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of euthanasia. Those who are against euthanasia may argue for the sanctity of life, while proponents of euthanasia rights emphasize alleviating suffering, and preserving bodily integrity, self-determination, and personal autonomy.[6] Jurisdictions where euthanasia is legal include the Netherlands, Canada,[7] Colombia, Belgium, and Luxembourg.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://sm4csi.home.xs4all.nl/nwo/MindControl/Such.things.are.known.htm

    Such Things are Known

    Dorothy Burdick, New York: Vantage Press Inc., 1982

    Foreword

    How do you explain an invasion of privacy that is cleverly designed to sound like a common psychological disturbance? How do you explain to people without an understanding of human physiology that body movement can only occur when energy is converted to an electrical charge?

    When you turn on a light, electrons cross a gap. When you start your car, an electric spark crosses a gap. While doing this you are totally unaware that in your own body the common dollar exchange of the human energy system, ATP (adenosine triphosphate), is releasing electrons and thus being converted into physical energy for all bodily processes and movement throughout the electron transport system. Every time you move or think, electrons stream across a gap between neurons called a synapse. This stream is like an electrical current and can be measured in the laboratory. The electrical field that you generate is very weak and is measured in millivolts and gauss.

    The recent interest in Oriental acupuncture to prevent pain has helped lead to the use of electronic devices to aid the healing of bone with electrical current and to interrupt electrical signals that would cause pain if transmitted. The courts have defined death as the absence of electrical activity in the brain. Electronics, which has made this kind of monitoring possible, is the science of the development and application of devices and systems involving the flow of electrons in gaseous media and in semiconductors.

    It is very hard to imagine life, any kind of life, as simply an electrical system. Kirlian photography shows the electrical aura around a leaf. Children arc being trained by physicists and psychologists to see electrical fields around people. When we speak of people as magnetic we may be speaking a scientific truth. The magnetoencephalogram (MEG) is used in the laboratory to measure the magnetic field in gauss given off by the cortex of the brain.

    No motion is made by the human body without raising the so-called resting potential of nerve cells to an action potential voltage causing work. Stored in the double phosphate high energy bond of ATP, electrons are released to travel through the nervous system to activate muscles and are measured in millivolts, 1/1000 of a volt. ATP is what makes fireflies light up at night and accounts for the well-known shocking behavior of the electric eel.

    The electroencephalogram (EEG) and the electrocardiogram (EKG) are graphic representations of the brain and heart making waves. Recently in sports medicine, athletes have had their body patterns recorded photographically to show their muscular strengths or weaknesses and predict their probable degree of success. This method has also been used to predict the performance of race horses.

    Laser, a gas medium, is a natural extension of electronics. It is used in industry, acoustical recording, message transmission, and to read fingerprints even years after they have been left on a page. It is also used to identify horses from their chestnuts, the callosities on their legs. As an example of a technology that has been under development for some time we have to give credit for laser to Uncle Sam and you, the taxpayer. The National Standards Laboratory is busy making accurate new measurements because modern laser techniques are so precise that they have made the old ones obsolete. Laser is so fine-tuned that it is used for eye surgery.

    The brain has been under investigation since the 1800s and earlier, and its activity recorded since the 1900s. It should not be too surprising that all brain tissue is simply a transmitter of electrical activity and a resonator that receives vibrations. With the computer, different areas of the brain can be displayed on a TV screen and the various activities under study displayed in an assortment of colors. The nerve impulses themselves can be converted into digital code so that the computer can identify their source, and from the source determine which part of the human nervous system is involved.

    You cannot see human brain waves by looking at a human head. If that head, however, is attached in some way to a computer, you can look at the visual display and see the waves. Large, fast computers like the Cray outrace the mind of man when it comes to making concise, accurate, instantaneous measurements. Remote-sensing and over-the-horizon radars are commonplace. Remote sensing of animals without hurting the animal has been done. A powerful laser scanning can measure acoustics, density and the sound of electrical activity including the broadcast coming from the human ear. The human ear not only receives, but also sends out its own signals which can be picked up by a sensitive listening device like the laser. Once sounds enter the ear they interfere with each other and set up harmonic tones.

    The range of human behavior is almost unquantifiable but attempts have been made. The basic areas, according to Maslow, that must be taken care of first are sleep, food and sex and I would add to this the need for emotional security. You are most likely to be stressed when these areas are attacked.

    The effects of radio or microwaves of various kinds have been reported in scientific and lay literature. It is known that they can affect blood pressure, body temperature and mental states by reaching the hypothalamus through the eardrum which is in the closest contact to this master gland. We also know that astronauts can be monitored in space. We have already invented lenses that see in the dark and penetrate foliage and walls. Suppose that from a distance you could be influenced by electromagnetic or microwaves and be stressed by electrical shock, unexpected muscle spasms or contractions which could be made to occur in both voluntary and the involuntary muscles of your viscera. Suppose also that the intensity could be orchestrated to produce sensations from pleasure through pain. Suppose additionally that the stress is augmented by the surprise element and through subliminal, that is unconsciously heard, vocal suggestion. You, the subject, are in your own home, very possibly totally unaware of any kind of outside interference, until you are spoken to via laser.[Note:1] You might suddenly realize that you, a human being, had become an instrument.

    This type of operation, under development for some time by American intelligence, is called mind control. It is more ghastly than George Orwell could possibly have conceived because he never experienced it.

    Only a few people understand the interrelationships between our magnificent technological and medical accomplishments and the military-industrial complex. These few are hampered in their attempts at communication by involvement in their own fields and by security requirements. Knowledge proliferates at a doubling rate greater than every two years. What is currently known is quickly dated. If you are working you are running to catch up. If you are not working you may be bogged down in family and community affairs.

    We exist in our complexity, psyching ourselves with pseudoscientific games, psychological hype and a couple-of-hundred-years-old love affair with snake oil and cures from the fountain of youth. It is both the best of times and the worst of times. Our so-called freedom is mired down in bureaucracy, ruled by dated old men, and clutched by inertia, boredom and fatigue.

    When I started building by case, I only wanted to prove that what was happening to me was technologically possible. Although my proof is mainly circumstantial evidence, it is known that anything which appears in the marketplace has usually been under government development for quite a long time before it filters into public consciousness.

    Suppose you were motivated by a combination mind/body attack and suppose also that you were lucky enough or unlucky enough to have the intelligence and kind of background to sort the whole thing out. What would you do?

    This book is an attempt to explain what I believe has happened to me. Others will attribute my account to many other things. From my point of view this is a true story no matter how ridiculous or neurotically distorted it may seem. I know that it can be used against me. I believe that the story line was designed by the intelligence community to fit their disinformation program. The purpose of the book is simply to present the possibilities. Perhaps the computer-age youngsters who will have to cope with these futuristic developments will not be as upset as I was.

    —D. B.

    June 5, 1981

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Android Humanoid Talking Robot

  • chen wolf

    Gang Stalking All Mechanized

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    His joke he alpha male

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture

    Torture (from the Latin tortus, “twisted”) is the act of deliberately inflicting physical or psychological pain on an organism in order to fulfill some desire of the torturer or compel some action from the victim. Torture, by definition, is a knowing and intentional act; deeds which unknowingly or negligently inflict pain without a specific intent to do so are not typically considered torture.

    Torture has been carried out or sanctioned by individuals, groups, and states throughout history from ancient times to modern day, and forms of torture can vary greatly in duration from only a few minutes to several days or longer. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. The need to torture another is thought to be the result of internal psychological pressure in the psyche of the torturer. The torturer may or may not intend to kill or injure the victim, but sometimes torture is deliberately fatal and can precede a murder or serve as a form of capital punishment. In other cases, the torturer may be indifferent to the condition of the victim. Alternatively, some forms of torture are designed to inflict psychological pain or leave as little physical injury or evidence as possible while achieving the same psychological devastation. Depending on the aim, even a form of torture that is intentionally fatal may be prolonged to allow the victim to suffer as long as possible (such as half-hanging).

    Although torture was sanctioned by some states historically, it is prohibited under international law and the domestic laws of most countries, as developed in the mid-20th century. It is considered to be a violation of human rights, and is declared to be unacceptable by Article 5 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Signatories of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols I and II of 8 June 1977 officially agree not to torture captured persons in armed conflicts, whether international or internal. Torture is also prohibited by the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which has been ratified by 158 countries.[1] Although torture is universally condemned by all democratic nations, there have been many suspected or known instances of its sanctioned use – regardless of its legality. An example of this is the use of euphemistically-named enhanced interrogation techniques including waterboarding, known to have been used by the United States after the September 11 attacks.

    National and international legal prohibitions on torture derive from a consensus that torture and similar ill-treatment are immoral, as well as impractical.[2] Despite these international conventions, organizations that monitor abuses of human rights (e.g., Amnesty International, the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims, Freedom from Torture, etc.) report widespread use condoned by states in many regions of the world.[3] Amnesty International estimates that at least 81 world governments currently practice torture, some of them openly.[4] Historically, in those countries where torture was legally supported and officially condoned, wealthy patrons sponsored the creation of extraordinarily ingenious devices and techniques of torture.

  • chen wolf

    https://poisonedbygangstalkers.com/

    Poisoned By Gang Stalkers

    I am Eldon J. Brown (The All Star Activist) and this is a blog devoted exclusively to detailing my experiences of being poisoned by Gang Stalkers. “Giftgas” (translated from the German as “poison gas”) was the Zyklon-B brand of cyanide gas pesticide used by the Nazi’s to murder Jewish prisoners in the Concentration Camp showers. The poisoning that is happening to both myself, as well as other Targeted Individuals all over the world, is analogous. The late actress Mrs. Brittany Murphy and her late husband Mr. Simon Monjack are glaring examples of this type of poisoning. I apologize for the use of Nazi imagery but I think it most effectively conveys our current situation here in the United States. Just as Germany went way back in the thirties, so have we continued here in the USA today. My main blog is The All Star Activist.

  • chen wolf

    http://mind-control-torture.blogspot.co.il/p/they-can-let-arise-extreme-cold-at.html

    They can let odors arise.

    Cigarette smoke, fecal, urine, waste, food- and perfume smells – in any room, in nature – at each place .

    The odors can be increased in their intensities.

    Cigarette smoke comes out from heaters, shafts, from the wall and out of the ground.

    I put my clothes on the heaters, they are completely filled with smoke. Same in the morning, my pajama and my linen are completely filled with smoke.

    Earlier I therefore could not sleep for nights, but since March 2012 I am put in deep sleep in which I can’t perceive anything.

    Also perfume and garbage smells come out from walls but also from sinks, if I just tilt my head down.

    The perpetraitors technology is able to direct the perfume and cigarette smell of my neighbor through the shaft into my bathroom. It comes clearely out of there and is not induced by frequencies into my brain. Also they can let wind come out of the bathroom shaft and then the perfume and cigarette odor is increased in intensity. My nerves are tortured, my muscle tone uplifted, the face of my neighbour and extreme negative frequencies are induced into my brain.

  • chen wolf

    http://mind-control-torture.blogspot.co.il/p/noise-torture-by.html

    Noise Torture

    Updated in April 2015

    Stomp on me

    Pop doors

    Hammering, drilling

    Strike against Walls

    Music and bass on maximum volume – always music with a fast beat, faster than my heartbeat

    Water runs for minutes up to hours

    The daily use of sawing machines in the garden

    Huge increase in car traffic through my street – increased running speed, car motors are overridden aggressive

  • chen wolf

    http://mind-control-torture.blogspot.co.il/p/blog-page_9392.html

    Electronic Torture – Symptoms

    Psychotronic Weapons

    Energy – Based Technologies from a distance, via satellite

    Frequency waves that can access a person’s nervous system, brain and body to affect their sight, vision, physical coordination, have been developed leaving people all over the world to suffer cruel torture, to be labeled “mentally ill”, and to ultimately die an early and horrible death.

    Computers are reading my brain frequencies and depending on which frequency my brain just is, pain is triggered and organs are manipulated in varying intensity.

    The physical torture is used for mind control which should lead to the extinction of my personality as well as the destruction of my mental-cognitive and organic forces.

    The more I researched on the internet about their technologies the more I was tortured.

    The more I had perceived their brain manipulations on me and went inside in the resistance, the greater was the physical torture and the faster the destruction process was daily increased.

    All pain and organ manipulation can be generated in various intensities of light to medium to strong, occur from second to second, and then stop. It can affect several organs simultaneously.

    24 hours each day without interruption:

    Blurred vision, extremely strong burning sensation, eye muscle contractions (feeling of tearing and crushing of the eyeballs), stitches in the eye. I see daily blue and white flashes.

    Generating extreme difficulty of breathing: 1. By tightening the abdominal muscles, narrowing of the bronchi and trachea – exhalation flows only shortened by itself, must exhale stepped up – just the same with inhalation – both techniques are applied simultaneously since July 2012, almost non-stop, 18 hours a day. In addition, severe pain in the stomach area are generated, presumably the solar plexus is cramped. 2. Generating a sense of suffocation in the head. 3. Narrowing of the vaginal walls nose – nasal breathing is considerably more difficult.

    Acceleration and deceleration of the heart beat, palpitations, dropouts, syncope, compression pain in the heart, stitches, blood pressure increase and-reduction.

    “Knife wounds” on the skull, severe headache, throbbing at the back of the head, pain in the bones behind the ears

    Stings like bee stings are placed in the body: Mainly in the eyes and face, but also in fingertips

    Electronic Rape: Manipulation of the anal, vaginal and clitorial nerves. Frequencies were also induced by sexual desire since the beginning of 2014. These manipulations can be increased in intensity. The more I resist, the more I get manipulated with subliminal messages that I wanted to do it, that it was absolutely my own decision. The psychopaths want to make me do all the things they want and if it fails, it will simply be induced more intense – this can take several hours and the physical pain in my sexual organs is unbearable.

    Nipples: pain, stiffening

    Nose, hands, feet, lower legs: Ice cold up on the pain threshold

    Dizziness

    Muscle cramps: calves, feet, ascending trapezius muscle among others

    Electric shock in the upper shoulder muscles

    Pain 1 cm below the ears

    Ear pain, stitches

    Tinnitus at different levels, sometimes right, sometimes left, or both simultaneously, Groaning noises, ambulance sirens

    Extreme sudden heating up, especially the head, neck, torso

    Cooling the body, the body temperature drops to 35 °

    Triggering urination

    Pain under the armpits

    Antipruritic and tickle at various locations, as if a tiny insect passes over the skin, preferably in the nostrils and on the upper and lower eyelid margin

    Extreme Fatigue

    Pulsing and twitching in various locations throughout the body

    Turbidity sense – smell, taste

    Disturbance of the Language Centre, Language is slowed, delayed

    Hoarseness of the voice to extinction

    Nausea when brushing your teeth

    Bloating, burping and sneezing attacks are triggered

    Nerve irritation: 1 approximately 10 cm above the outer ankle of the right leg and the right foot sole. second on the right arm. 3 on the outer side of the upper arm.

    Cuts under hypnosis – see point 4 below Psychotronic Mind Control

    Increasing and decreasing muscle tone – see item 5 under Psychotronic Mind Control

    My body is getting stronger under power and under constant tension – the nerves will tear sometime.

  • chen wolf

    http://lib.cet.ac.il/pages/item.asp?item=9776

    Summary

    One of the traumatic events that affected the United States in the twentieth century is the Vietnam War. War never officially declared, and took place over 25 years and throughout their tenure of five presidents.

    The trauma of the Vietnam War

    Author: Eyal Naveh

    One of the traumatic events that affected the United States in the twentieth century is the Vietnam War. It was a tragedy for tens of thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese victims who fell in the war. But the tragedy was a significant Looiitnamim when he eventually eliminate the Americans from their land – remains a traumatized public in the United States. In many ways, the war revealed false assumptions, idiotic decisions cost the lives of many soldiers, using the ridiculous justifications for continued intervention, and deep social divisions that occurred when the company revealed the lies and folly system of political and military leaders. If World War II seized during the best “, the Vietnam War, which was never officially declared, and took place over 25 years and throughout their tenure of not less than five presidents, war was seen as absolutely evil. Today, in retrospect, although it is clear to almost everyone that this war was a mistake and was contrary to American interests, but it took a mistake not yet received final processing and therefore is still provokes outrage and accusations at each other. The wounds and scars of war banner of their bodies and souls of thousands of people are still not healed, and therefore considered intervention in Vietnam trauma of the twentieth century, which is a source for books, movies and various commemorative rituals that attempt, after all, give some meaning to the event.

    The United States began to intervene in the peninsula Indochina has been in the fifties, when it was replaced the French colonial cause. French units were defeated Battle of Dien Bien Phu by the Vietnamese National Resistance, known as the Viet Minh, led by Ho Chi Minh leader. After the defeat in the French expressed their desire to leave from the area and to grant independence to countries under their control – Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. So that the area does not fall under Communist influence, the Americans offered help in the transition process to establish independent states, democratic, multi-governing party. But stayed Chi Minh, the Vietnamese liberation movement leader, described himself as a Marxist and Flag land reform including land confiscation nobility and their distribution peasant masses. The Americans led by Secretary of State Dulles declared Marxist did not want to be the head of the independent state. Attempts of Ho Chi Minh to approach the Americans and explain his views were unsuccessful. Memory of China and Korea was still very fresh in American policy makers, and they were determined to reach a solution that would prevent the Vietnam communist state establishment. And based on a broad interpretation of the theory of containment, said State Department officials headed to Dulles on the curb communism, has to ensure that no other country in the Western colonial regime released, will not be a communist.

    Geneva committee convened by the American powers refused to allow the establishment of Vietnam led by Marxist leader, and after discussions and negotiations, it was decided to divide the Vietnam temporarily into two states: North governs Ho Chi Minh, while the south will be under Arab control. All parties agreed that this division will be temporary, until the time is ripe for the establishment of a single democratic and multi-party system. Americans do not want elections because they knew were Chi Minh would win this election because he was the undisputed leader of the Vietnamese resistance movement. The dividend was distributed on its major powers without Viets asked their opinion. Western countries led by the United States established a puppet government in South Vietnam, Saigon city, headed by Nguyen Dame – Vietnamese businessman who lived outside the Paris and London, and belonged to the Catholic minority. He had no support among millions of Vietnamese peasants were mostly Buddhists.

    To stabilize the regime in the south, the United States spend money and send experts to Saigon. The Eisenhower administration sent several hundred experts in administration, military and police officers, and encouraged American companies to invest in South Vietnam. But the government needed additional American forces to protect its very existence, and the early sixties send Canadian police forces and combat units first – the Green Berets – are supposed to help the South Vietnamese army to establish effective. Meanwhile, guerrilla units were set up in villages so-called Vietcong, single object puppet government in Saigon and began to attack the regime’s enough. These units were used by the North and won widespread support from the citizens of the South who opposed the regime imposed on them obviously down and caught the colonial essence.

    Actually, during the Kennedy effective police force is built around Saigon, prevented the actions of the Vietcong guerrillas. However, internal disputes and corruption among the southern government led to internal struggles within the family enough, and towards the end of 1963, attempts were made to internal coup against enough encouragement Central Intelligence Agency. US ambassador in Saigon realized at this point that there is no point in investing in southern regime. After breasts was murdered by one of his opponents, Ambassador flew to Washington to present to President Kennedy the gravity of the situation. The report includes the ambassador argued that the United States is being dragged into a civil war between gangs, corrupt internal use American money and weapons their struggles with each other. On the other hand, the regime in North Vietnam won sympathy across the country and Ho Chi Minh perceived as the legitimate leader of the Vietnamese everyone. But things did not fall on deaf ears because, just as the ambassador was preparing to file a report – President Kennedy was assassinated.

    When Johnson came to the White House, interest in Vietnam was not elicit priority. But very quickly he required emergency decisions to save the system of government in South Vietnam collapse and disintegration and consequently sent more troops to Saigon. To not be considered a defeatist view of guerrilla actions supported by North Vietnam Communist, Johnson declared the US commitment to South Vietnam Democratic Front will serve as an outpost of the Western world against Communist penetration in Asia. When applying for the approval of Congress to expand the involvement is based on the so-called domino theory, that if South Vietnam fell to the communists, then like dominoes, will follow the rest of Southeast Asia. This created a strategic threat to American interests in the Pacific, a threat which could spread to the United States itself. To answer Republican criticism claiming that the conservative government is not helping enough South Vietnam introduced Johnson administration government is determined to advance American interests by providing additional assistance to South Vietnam.

    Between 1963 to 1968 The escalation process to create situations that can point to one factor explaining the formation. In any case, in 1963 there were 15,000 American soldiers in Vietnam, while in 1968 the number was 600,000 soldiers and commanders, were actually integrated military action in Vietnam, air and land. No one has ever declared war, and any escalation was made by presidential decrees decisions were taken without public discussion and approved by Congress. The intervention was called security and policing actions and therefore did not require the convening of Congress for a declaration of war. Ironically expressed adherence on the part of Johnson’s escalation policy to continue in the third world as a creative who maintained his predecessor. National security policy makers applied the theory of containment for East Asia and legitimized the intervention as an expression of containment against Communism. The fact that the front was so far occurred in the third world and created the illusion of a quick and complete victory. There was also pressure from the army to try new tools and to apply advanced technology to maintain a high operational level. When Johnson announced that the United States would not leave Vietnam to complete containment of communist rhetoric is familiar characteristic of a great power had never defeated in any war. Moreover, democratic government suspected by Republican conservatives defeatism, almond look more American right-wing, and to show how much he is committed to an escalation of the fighting. Relationship with Company policy also big trees and expanded its US operations in Vietnam.

    The results of the massive military involvement were catastrophic, but the president was able to conceal the extent of the disaster from the public. War aims had not been set and the soldiers did not know exactly what they are doing in the jungles of Vietnam. They went on missions search and destruction designed to expose Vietcong communist cells, but because all citizens as members suspected Vietcong – could not do it without massacring the local population. US aircraft bombed villages in the poor and delete them from the earth. Lives have become very cheap. Political corruption in South Vietnam and expanded too much American soldiers sitting in Saigon headquarters were involved in this corruption. Drug trafficking, racism, refusing orders and desertions were an integral part of the routine military. Most of the soldiers were mobilized to Vietnam from poor families; A large part of the fighters were black minorities. In contrast officers came from the middle class. People who belonged to the upper classes have found ways not to serve in Vietnam. Junior field commanders were given orders to levels of senior commanders have never been in battle. All this took place thousands of miles from home, so it’s hard to say that here in a defensive war on the very existence of the United States.

    Following the Tonkin Gulf affair began in 1964, the massive American bombardments on the northern capital Hanoi and other cities and villages in Northern Vietnam. President Johnson lied to the nation and said that artillery hit northern innocently cruising American ship outside the territorial waters in the Gulf, and the bombing was response to aggression from the north. In fact the ship was American spy ship sailing in the territorial waters of North Vietnam. Massive bombing and destruction havoc and took lives of hundreds of thousands of peasants. Some horror found out the affair from island to island, while military court accused a junior officer with the American massacre of Vietnamese village unit. Topics such as blatantly illegal orders have become part of the public discourse that began to trouble many citizens. The officer was charged and sentenced to prison, but the court made it clear that behind the massacre of an entire system is about sending the army into an impossible task and takes no responsibility for the results.

    The disintegration began in January 1968. The same year he announced Johnson winning the battle and visible – Vietcong fighters left the Tet offensive (Vietnamese New Year). They hit major cities all South Vietnam, Saigon attacked and managed to take over for a few hours on certain sections of the American Embassy. Time passed by the US Army unit removed the Vietcong from Saigon. Embassy compound battles were filmed by television crews and atrocities were broadcast by media networks reaching living rooms of millions of viewers in the United States and around the world. Disgrace and shame were in full public view and led to widespread outbreak of war resistance movement.

    In fact there was no institutionalized opposition movement and clear the war in Vietnam. Is formed along the sixties and it is possible to identify at least three sources:

    First Source is the right conservative opposition Republican composed of politicians and retired military personnel. Senator Barry Goldwater expressed the position of the Conservatives have been in 1964, when he claimed that the US administration really does not want to win a war because he ran it reluctantly and in a slothful not suppressed the traitors within, not declared a state of emergency, not formally declared war, let the media freedom without censorship, and refrained from using weapons of mass destruction. Lack of determination and will to support the unqualified support regime in South Vietnam, said conservative allies hit South Vietnamese and well utilized by the enemy North Vietnamese and Vietcong by underground.

    Source resistance two primary source is not identified politically. Women of soldiers, mothers of sons who served in Vietnam, and veterans organizations, have begun to wonder about the purpose of the war and its accompanying terrible price. Without the possibility of a quick victory must end the conflict and bring the boys home – these groups claimed. Most of them expressed anger that only the poor and uneducated are paying the price and asked why these applicants to universities are exempt from fighting. Had emphasized that boys born in the South, Midwest, agricultural sectors and among ethnic minorities is not European, are bearing the terrible burden of war. Others argued that television serves the enemy, press brings demoralize the army and therefore such conditions have to stop immediately and bring the troops home. This opposition did not deal with strategic analysis and is formed around a sense of deprivation and suffering of soldiers and their families. Can be summed up her feelings of frustration following the inability to win a quick victory. “Or win now or Check Now” – This was the main message of popular opposition.

    The third source of most strikingly opposing the war came from the liberal left. Groups of students, religious leaders, intellectuals, famous movie actors, human rights activists, environmental groups, activists of the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King, Young standing before recruitment, women’s organizations, activists, ethnic groups, classes left out against militarism and US imperialism – all of these were in various protest actions against the war. Had burned their draft cards publicly, others fled to Canada and called on soldiers not to follow orders. Voluntary organizations offering legal aid absentees and deserters, artists put on theater stages rock concerts and plays a protest against the war in Vietnam. Students demonstrated against soldiers returning from Vietnam and called them names. Actress Jane Fonda met with the leaders of North Vietnam’s capital Hanoi and northern Israel condemned publicly. The streets were shouting the slogan “We are all Ho Chi Minh” and the others are on hunger strike against what they called the war crimes carried out by the United States against humanity. University campuses have become an arena of confrontation between protesting students and police and security forces. The students were protesting against a range of injustices, but the Vietnam War protests and focused most of them have provided concrete and palpable injustice.

    Liberal protest also took a political dimension. Democratic Party formed the liberal wing led by Senator Eugene McCarthy of Minnesota, called on the government to get out of Vietnam immediately and unconditionally. McCarthy introduced the presidential candidate for the elections and centered around anti-war activists. At the beginning of the race early McCarthy won significant achievements and continued candidacy threatened to split the party. As of 1965 were key figures in the administration of Johnson resign because of the war. The press secretary, Bill Moyers, and the American ambassador to the United Nations George Bull argued that they can not continue to justify American actions in Vietnam. Later, in 1968, decided to even the defense secretary, Robert McNamara, to submit his resignation to the President. Robert Kennedy left the serving Minister of Justice Johnson administration in 1964, but in 1968 he also announced joining the race for the presidency on behalf of the Democratic party and he spoke out against continuing the war.

    Liberal opposition’s arguments opposing the war were varied. Among other things, they argued that the United States faced an internal civil war; Communists in Vietnam will represent an authentic national liberation movement and served all the interests of Moscow; By contrast the South is illegitimate administration, and hated the Vietnamese public, and portrayed the United States in the eyes of the Vietnamese as fosters corrupt dictatorship. Some have argued that a blanket application of the doctrine of containment on Third World reality is a strategic error that prevented the United States developing sophisticated policy towards the national liberation movements in Asia and Africa. Much of the criticism was based on moral arguments values: Critics argued that the war intensifies racism, exposing ethnic and class conflicts and destroying the delicate fabric of society by increasing feelings of acute deprivation on the lower classes and from ethnic and racial minorities who feel victims. Others stressed the fact that the United States has imposed on rural Vietnam more bombs than Nazi Germany, caused great destruction and unnecessary victims – actions bordered on war crimes against the civilian population. Many critics have pointed out the absurdity that it was the United States who always fought for freedom, human rights and democracy, engaged in dirty war in the jungles of Asia and harms innocent civilians. It seems opponents from any angle, it is better to leave than to continue to get stuck in the mud of Vietnam and get involved even more unjustifiable war consensus that environment, unravels the American social fabric inwards, and undermines the moral strength and American strategic interests externally.

    Present strongly the government itself began to feel discomfort towards expanding operations in Vietnam. President Johnson himself felt hurt and cheated, especially when senior government abandoned its policy and came out openly against it. As mentioned above, both McCarthy and Kennedy announced that they will compete against the incumbent party’s nomination for president and early elections in early 1968 the president got quite limited gains against both contenders. Therefore decided to Johnson, a television speech broadcast to the entire nation in March 1968, that is retiring from the race and that he does not intend to run for another term. It turned out that all the candidates who participated in the presidential race that year promised if elected will end the war. Certainly Kennedy and McCarthy promised a quick end, but also the Democratic establishment candidate, Vice President Hubert Humphrey – running for election and eventually won the party’s nomination – has promised to end the conflict if elected. Democrats versus Republicans split their ranks united around the candidacy of Richard Nixon, who also promised to bring American troops home by “and Iitnamiztzih” of war, we would transfer the burden of fighting the Vietcong and the North troops to South Vietnamese.

    Nixon won the election, but promise to reduce conflict proved false promises. Although he greatly reduced combat ground troops leaving southern Only officers and experts to help bring the Army South Vietnam into operational capability; But on the other hand is greatly expanded air attacks on North Vietnam. Bomb victims who made ten times the losses caused by ground units. Nixon announced the invasion of Cambodia by intervening in the internal affairs of the principality. Cambodia units supported by the Americans were committing genocide in their country very bloody civil war. The American public felt cheated and betrayed, and some severely reacted against the continued engagement and expansion. People have lost confidence in the leadership and opposition to the Vietnam War expanded into opposition to America and everything it represents. Political hypocrisy, destructive technology, the arrogance of force, the gap between the rhetoric of freedom and democracy and cruel acts that border on genocide – all these led to so many American young people radicalized their positions and expressed their revulsion and disgust toward their country.

    Nixon realized that at some point, with the national security adviser, later appointed foreign minister – Henry Kissinger – instead of one of the nation as promised elections, the policy leads to fragmentation and hatred. Thus instructed Kissinger to open talks with North ceasefire that will lead to a settlement in the region. Indeed, Kissinger was able to overcome any ideological fixations of his predecessors and negotiate directly with the communist government of North Vietnamese. Convened a French brokered peace conference in Paris and eventually led to a ceasefire in 1973.

    Peace agreement in the United States was received with relief and satisfaction. Mere cessation of hostilities and the return of all the soldiers home was desired by the public. Few took the body of the agreement, which stipulated that US military forces to completely leave Vietnam and in the rebirth of two states living in peace with one another. All the experts realized that there is actually a southern country, because the government in Saigon took place on American bayonets, and in the absence of US military force will collapse completely. But it seems that the collapse of the government in Saigon seemed most of the public is better than continued military presence there. Indeed not undergone several months of the signing of the agreement and the process of disintegration of South Vietnam began. Communist guerrilla forces occupied the southern territories, and in 1975 went to Saigon, took over the US embassy and declared the state union. Mirrors frightened flight of the US embassy compound in Saigon were filmed live. These images are engraved in the collective memory as an expression of visual degradation and tragic final chord twenty-one years of intervention-fall of the world’s greatest superpower in Vietnam.

    bibliography:

    Title: The trauma of the Vietnam War

    Title: American Century

    Author: Naveh, Eyal

    Editor of the book: necklace – Meiri, Dalit

    Date: 2000

    Publishing: Israel. Ministry of Defence. Publishing

    Notes: 1. Library “Broadcast University”.

    2. Army Radio Series Editor: Yuval want.

    3. The series editor in publishing: Jesse Cordova.

    Comments to this item:

    1. The article is Chapter VIII book.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

    The Protocols of the Elders of Zion (Russian: Протоколы сионских мудрецов) or The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion is an antisemitic fabricated text purporting to describe a Jewish plan for global domination. The forgery was first published in Russia in 1903, translated into multiple languages, and disseminated internationally in the early part of the 20th century. According to the claims made by some of its publishers, the Protocols are the minutes of a late 19th-century meeting where Jewish leaders discussed their goal of global Jewish hegemony by subverting the morals of Gentiles, and by controlling the press and the world’s economies.

    Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the US in the 1920s. Adolf Hitler was a major proponent. It was studied, as if factual, in German classrooms after the Nazis came to power in 1933,[1] despite having been exposed as fraudulent by The Times of London in 1921. It is still widely available today in numerous languages, in print and on the Internet, and continues to be presented by some proponents as a genuine document.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

    National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state as well as other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism developed out of the influences of Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after German defeat in World War I.

    Nazism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of what Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.[2] It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, or “people’s community” based on national unity. The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum, while excluding those deemed either to be community aliens or foreign peoples. The term “National Socialism” arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of “socialism”, as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privately owned businesses of Aryans.

    The Nazi Party was founded as the Pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers’ Party on 5 January 1919. By the early 1920s, Adolf Hitler assumed control of the organization and renamed it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP) to broaden its appeal. The National Socialist Program, adopted in 1920, called for a united Greater Germany that would deny citizenship to Jews or those of Jewish descent, while also supporting land reform and the nationalization of some industries. In Mein Kampf, written in 1924, Hitler outlined the antisemitism and anti-communism at the heart of his political philosophy, as well as his disdain for parliamentary democracy and his belief in Germany’s right to territorial expansion.

    In 1933, with the support of traditional conservative nationalists, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and the Nazis gradually established a one-party state, under which Jews, political opponents and other “undesirable” elements were marginalized, with several millions eventually imprisoned and killed. Hitler purged the party’s more socially and economically radical factions in the mid-1934 Night of the Long Knives and, after the death of President Hindenburg, political power was concentrated in his hands, as Führer or “leader”. Following the Holocaust and German defeat in World War II, only a few fringe racist groups, usually referred to as neo-Nazis, still describe themselves as following National Socialism.

  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf

    פורסם בתאריך 6 בינו׳ 2013

    Hanson Robotics’ android portrait of Einstein, built with the Hubo Group at KAIST, and UTA.

    I am Dr. David Hanson, and this video shows an example of my work to develop robots with increasingly humanlike capabilities, in the quest to realize Genius Machines—machines with greater-than-human intelligence, creativity, wisdom, and compassion. To this end, I conduct research in robotics, artificial intelligence, the arts, cognitive science, product design and deployment, and integrate these efforts in the pursuit of novel human robot relations. In this quest, I seek fundamental understanding of human mind, purpose, and context in the cosmos. I want to understand the physical nature of creativity and emergence, and strive to establish a computational basis of compassion, thus empowering our algorithms with these magical abilities. I extend these queries to include the following: what can and should we (as a civilization, in symbiosis with our technology and with nature) create next? How can we increase the likelihood of beneficial results, and decrease the likelihood of existential threats resulting from our creations. To this end, I believe that building human-inspired character agents can serve as a scaffold for growing positive human-machine relations, as we build more complex AI, approaching general (human-level) intelligence and creativity. Personally I contend that building human-inspired character agents will lead to Friendly AGI (artificial general intelligence). By raising AGI among us—to be protagonists, friends, and members of our family—they will convergently evolve values analogous to ours, and thus come to truly care for us and earn our trust, and I believe this evolutionary path bears the highest likelihood of safety if we realize human-level intelligent, creative machines. Given the instability of our time, and the increasing complexity of global problems, we desperately need super-human Genius Machines, intelligence, creativity, wisdom, and compassion, to survive and make the leap to the next stage in human existence. Let’s pull together in an open source Genius Machines movement, and realize a better future.

    https://youtu.be/Qbkdt8Wg1EQ

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%98%D7%99%D7%9F_%D7%95%D7%9F_%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%A4%D7%9C%D7%93

    Martin van Creveld

    Martin van Creveld, 2008

    Martin van Creveld (in Dutch: Martin van Creveld) (born 1946) is Professor Emeritus of History at the Hebrew University and a prominent military historians in the world.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Biography

    2 studies

    2.1 Military History

    2.2 Women Study

    2.3 United States

    2.4 State of Israel

    2.5 His current studies

    3 books

    4 External links

    5 References

    Biography [edit source | editing]

    Martin van Creveld was born in Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Both his parents were old Dutch family, who lived in Holland in the 18th century already. He immigrated to Israel with his family in 1950 and decided to become a historian at the age of ten, when the Dutch called the book “History of the World in a nutshell.” Earned a doctorate at the London School of Economics in 1971-1969 and received him at the age of 25. The doctoral thesis was on “Hitler and the Balkans: 1941-1940” and is published as a book by Cambridge University Press.

    Van Creveld of the Hebrew University began teaching in 1971, he was appointed a full professor in 1988. He retired as professor emeritus in 2007, he spent sabbaticals at King’s College, London, and Freiburg and Potsdam (twice), Germany with various scholarships. Military schools National War College in Washington, and Marine Corps University at Quantico. Some of the books written by Van Creveld appear from the obligation to call for US military officers.

    In 2011, Van Creveld had to leave the University of Trier in Germany, where he was a visiting professor, the student protests against the inappropriate statements made in turn against women. It also had to take early retirement from the Hebrew University in similar circumstances. Today (2012) he teaches at Tel Aviv University security studies program. Student Association approached the administration demanding to sack him, because of “abusive behavior toward students” [1] [2].

    Martin van Creveld is married to Deborah Levy and both have children from previous marriages.

    His research [edit source | editing]

    Martin van Creveld is about three thousand years of military history, with an emphasis on Europe. He wrote 22 books translated into twenty languages ​​(as in 2011), including two women, one of the United States, and one on the history of the State of Israel.

    Military History [edit source | editing]

    Hitler’s strategy 1941-1940: Riddle of the Balkans (1973)

    Van Creveld book tried to prove the German invasion of Russia is not delayed because of the war that Hitler managed Balkans, but for different reasons: the weather, logistics and lack of resources such as mechanical equipment and procurement.

    War and maintenance; logistics Mooalnstiin to Patton (1978)

    The book caused a breakthrough in that time of publication did not study these subjects. The book divides into two periods logistics: one, to 1914 and the second, from 1914 onwards. The argument underlying this book is that in 1914, the outbreak of the First World War, everything changed. If by then the vast majority of supply was food for humans and animals, the situation has changed, the industrial products that needed for the management of modern war it was impossible to take the field so it changed drastically the way the hosts were and how they worked their strategy. This led to a fundamental change in how armies operated and managed the systems war.

    Fighting spirit and performance of the German Army US Army 1945-1939 (1982)

    It was generally accepted that the German army is fighting better than any other army in World War II, Van Creveld’s purpose was to examine why things were as they were. For this purpose, the value of careful comparison between the ways in which the two armies conducted their manpower at their disposal. It turned out that the Americans were concentrated in the comfort of administration and the Germans, for various reasons, put great emphasis on the more psychological and social needs of the soldiers.

    Command during the war (1985)

    The argument expressed in the book is the essence of military command is dealing with uncertainty. The book shows how different historical armies faced with uncertainty, mechanisms and methods adopted by them, and finally their success.

    Technology and War from 2000 BC to the present (1988)

    It is a history of military technology from ancient times until today.

    Training officers: as a professional non-relevant (1989)

    It is a history of how mid-level officers trained in history, Van Creveld he first wrote about it. The book expands on the school for officers of the German army, considered the best in the world and have existed in 1945-1870. The author believes that the quality of the school depends less on what you learn and the more the identity of Teachers and learners.

    Transformation of War (1991)

    This is the most famous book of Van Creveld cited over 1000 times in scientific publications.

    The book has two main arguments: first, a conventional war is about to end and that the future belongs guerrillas, insurgency, terrorism. The second is related to motivation and suggests that, contrary to conventional wisdom, most of them soldiers of the war is politics by other means as claimed Clausewitz. In other words Clausewitz is the wrong directory war of the future. Book point of view is from the bottom up, in contrast to Clausewitz’s point of view, which is top-down. The author argues that the war should be conducted against an enemy that is at least equal to you the power, if you run a war against the weak from you, this leads to demoralization in most cases, and then only a matter of time before that dominated becomes stronger and the weak becomes strong. This argument is developed following Van Creveld books.

    Nuclear proliferation and the future of the conflict (1993)

    The book is a derivative of Krefeld’s book The Transformation of War and nuclear deals with the meaning of the revolution, but not in general, but with regard to two regions in the world:

    1. South Asia: Triangle Chinese-Indian-Pakistani.

    2. Middle East. The author argues that these two areas resulted in the great wars and nuclear for reasons that happened.

    Air power and maneuver-based warfare (1994)

    The book deals with the way the Air Force has helped to achieve victory in a particular type of system, that today you can read them Blitzkrig. The book is directed against the doctrine of strategic bombing, the bombing depth. The main argument is that the right way to use the Air Force is assisted ground forces and explains how to do this.

    Sword and the Olive: A Critical History of the IDF (1998)

    Van Creveld takes his argument that he presented in his book Transformation and draws him to the IDF, this is a book about the rise and decline of the IDF. The argument is that the IDF was able to make himself the best army in the world, thanks to the high motivation of soldiers resulting from an existential need, but since the Lebanon War in 1982, the IDF fought only against much weaker powers, and the motivation of the soldiers had dropped drastically. The results can be seen in the Lebanon War II. [Clarification needed]

    The Rise and Decline of the State (1999)

    The book tries to follow the changing forms of government or government from the beginning until today. The main argument is the 17th century marked the turning point. This period, which invented the modern state, which is a corporation, which is not the same as rulers or the gated, but is an abstract containing both. Hence the book follows the European idea spread across the entire planet. The argument is that the state peaked in 1975-1789 and since she is withdrawing from all sorts of reasons.

    Art of War; War and Military Studies (2000)

    The book was written following a request from the British publisher Castle, she wanted a short book summarizing the military philosophy from antiquity until today.

    Moshe Dayan (2004)

    The book was commissioned by the publishing house Cassell, it focuses on Moshe Dayan himself and ran them less wars.

    Protect Israel: Strategic Plan for Peace and Security (2004)

    The book argues that having a detrimental territories to Israel if you want to protect Israel should leave the occupied. Van Creveld’s view the greatest danger to Israel is militarily, but demographically, politically and socially. Israel will be stronger than you are without territories. He develops the same argument raised his Transformation, which causes demoralization nothing more than a war against the weak, in this case control over two to three million Arabs.

    The changing face of war: the battles of the Marne to the lessons of Iraq (2007)

    This is a brief history of twentieth-century war last chapter deals with the war against terror is now in the opinion of Van Creveld main type of fighting, an idea first rider in his Transformation and describes the ways to deal with terrorism. Van Creveld know who is fighting terrorism, fighting the war against the poor and weak leads to demoralization if it persists over time.

    The author believes that there are two ways to fight terrorism, one is to weaken yourself, use only ended up with police tools, like the English did in Northern Ireland, this way you avoid committing crimes and inevitable demoralization. The second way is to strike a decisive blow, like the massacre by Hafez Assad in 1982 butter.

    Both ways require extraordinary inner strength: one to restrain yourself, a very difficult task, and the second bet on the jackpot, because if you fail, you’re left with nothing. Most people in positions of leadership lacks the courage to take on any one of two ways, and as a result they fall between the cracks.

    Creveld describes the rules for landing blows won the first rule, did Hcnotic secrecy, to threaten; Concentrate your forces in confidence and peace. Rule two: Hello all power, but for a short time (ideally it should be lightning fast, that if continued over time, weakening force of the blow and it also leads to demoralization; it is better to strike too hard than too weak). Rule Three, do not apologize – and that’s the most important rule, once you apologize you lose fifty percent of the effect. Van Creveld here takes the example of butter. Once these runs massacre Assad’s brother on TV, which was responsible for carrying out the massacre, did indeed kill 30-25 thousand men, women and children. He looked them in the eye and said: “I think I killed more.” Rule Four: Let someone do it for you, so if it fails, you can try something else.

    Culture War (2008)

    The argument presented in the book is that the war will be accompanied by a huge and great culture. It includes uniforms, weapons decorated, the music, the rituals that take place before, during and after the war, the monuments of victory and the various military cemeteries, the laws of war, and so forth. He charged that this culture is of paramount importance to the management of the war and who neglected endangers his life. The book covers the entire history of humanity and discussed not only in Europe but also among the nations and countries such as Japan, China, American Indians and Zulus in South Africa.

    Aerospace power era (2011)

    The claim made in the book is the amount of airflow in the sunset, and end in sight.

    Women Study [edit source | editing]

    Men, Women and War (2001)

    Thesis made in the book is that the entry of women in modern armies is one of the ongoing atrophy symptoms of those armies. The process of degeneration began with the advent of nuclear weapons, which led almost complete disappearance of the great wars between major countries followed a dramatic reduction of armies designed to manage them. As the war diminished and declined, they began to serve in the armies of more women.

    Attributable sex (2003)

    The book divides the subject into eight topics:

    The first chapter is called “Three Tales” which refutes Van Creveld three myths: first, that during the ancient Greek women were imprisoned in; Second, the witch hunt was intended to oppress women; Third, the Nazis suppressed women, the author several test pilots were fighters in Nazi Germany and the first-ever helicopter flown by a German lady.

    The second chapter deals with the biological aspects. The author brings a biologist’s argument is known jokingly wrote that men are simply a means of nature to produce more women and measures so successful. Company consisting solely of women is theoretically possible, while a built men only – not.

    The third chapter deals with men, women and work. The argument is early days for onward man’s role was to work and support. Men have always worked jobs more difficult, dirty and dangerous women and the situation today.

    The fourth chapter concerns the economic side of the issue. The author claims that many human enterprises, including family welfare state on the one hand and on the other hand, are designed in no small measure to transfer resources from the hands of men to those of women who consume them.

    The fifth chapter deals with women, men and law. The main argument is that the law discriminates against women is always better. Among other things, they were forced to minor penalties in respect of those offenses lot.

    The sixth chapter discusses women in the war. When it comes to war women enjoy numerous privileges. The most important privilege is that women never were obliged to fight, while men are committed to this and in case of refusal were executed or are severely punished.

    The seventh chapter deals with quality of life. It turns out that has always loved women in many ways a better quality of life than men. Today, women live longer than men, but two centuries ago the situation was reversed and there were more men than women. The author two reasons: the dramatic decline in maternal mortality; And the Industrial Revolution vastly improved the working conditions of women relative to those of men.

    The eighth chapter raises the question: “If women so well, why are they complaining?” The answer is that women are sex complainant. A man complains Natanz would ridicule or contempt, the woman complains much better chance to get what she wants.

    Van Creveld all know that modern feminism is nonsense. Feminism is the best proof of the righteousness of Sigmund Freud’s argument about the existence of penis envy, which is the great motivation of women. Moreover, women have never been able to decide if they want to be different from men, or similar to them. They are in between two worlds as they zigzag from one end to the basic relationship between the sexes has not changed.

    United States [edit source | editing]

    American mystery (2008)

    The book tries to understand how the United States operates and what the factors that shape it. Van Creveld presents the argument that the United States is the only democracy in the world, with time becoming more democratic. This democracy shapes the political, economic, and foreign policy and security. Furthermore, the author claims that the US is the worst place in the world for women and children.

    The State of Israel [edit source | editing]

    The land of milk and blood; The rise of modern Israel (2011)

    This is a short book to explain the non-Israeli reader to Israel and claims that Israel is the most successful political creation of the twentieth century. It covers mostly military, economic and social security; But try to include other issues such as culture and women.

    His current studies [edit source | editing]

    war games; Gladiators to Giga Bytes

    The book is a brief history of the war games of all kinds, ranging from the time of King David ( “boys will rise up and play before us”) through Hgldiatoriim games, contests knights, duel, various board games that simulate war, to computers and the latest simulators. A separate chapter deals with the attitude of women in these games.

    The search for equality

    The book is a brief overview of the development of the concept of ancient Greece to the present with special emphasis on the problematic generated due to political correctness and advances in medicine and biology.

    A Brief History of conscience

    Source research is the question whether the Nazis conscience? The goal is to follow the development of the concept and its integration into other elements from antiquity to the environmental conscience “of the day.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Israelis are really nazis. Its government dictatorship form 1970′ in israel they make use of any flat in any floor. Amazing 24 hours bang bang unresposible state and disgusting citizens. I didn’t hear such case anywhere only in israel such disgusting dicctatorship from unresponsiblle authorities.

  • chen wolf

    The world go forward this project is replay of 1967. They disgusting belong to ancient times.

  • chen wolf

    Such neighbours is as nazis from weimar.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Disgusting Israel

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonderweg

    Sonderweg, a German loanword meaning “special path”, identifies the theory in German historiography that considers the German-speaking lands or the country Germany itself to have followed a course from aristocracy to democracy unlike any other in Europe. It is also used to explain German foreign policy and ideology before and during World War I, which was characterized by the search for a “Third Way” unlike “vulgar” Western democracy or “Tsaristic” eastern autocracy.[citation needed]

    The modern school of thought by that name arose early during World War II as a consequence of the rise of Nazi Germany. In consequence of the scale of the devastation wrought on Europe by Nazi Germany, the Sonderweg theory of German history has progressively gained a following inside and outside of Germany, especially since the late 1960s. In particular, its proponents argue that the way Germany developed over the centuries virtually ensured the evolution of a social and political order along the lines of Nazi Germany. In their view, German mentalities, the structure of society, and institutional developments followed a different course in comparison with the other nations of the West, which had a normal development of their histories. The German historian Heinrich August Winkler wrote about the question of there being a Sonderweg: “For a long time, educated Germans answered it in the positive, initially by laying claim to a special German mission, then, after the collapse of 1945, by criticizing Germany’s deviation from the West. Today, the negative view is predominant. Germany did not, according to the now prevailing opinion, differ from the great European nations to an extent that would justify speaking of a ‘unique German path’. And, in any case, no country on earth ever took what can be described as the ‘normal path'”.[1]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation

    Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics, such as the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been performed by countries including Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, North Korea, the United States, and the Soviet Union. Examples include Project MKUltra, Unit 731, and the experiments of Josef Mengele.

    The Declaration of Helsinki, developed by the World Medical Association (WMA), is widely regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics.[1][2][3]

    Sonderweg, a German loanword meaning “special path”, identifies the theory in German historiography that considers the German-speaking lands or the country Germany itself to have followed a course from aristocracy to democracy unlike any other in Europe. It is also used to explain German foreign policy and ideology before and during World War I, which was characterized by the search for a “Third Way” unlike “vulgar” Western democracy or “Tsaristic” eastern autocracy.[citation needed]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonderweg

    The modern school of thought by that name arose early during World War II as a consequence of the rise of Nazi Germany. In consequence of the scale of the devastation wrought on Europe by Nazi Germany, the Sonderweg theory of German history has progressively gained a following inside and outside of Germany, especially since the late 1960s. In particular, its proponents argue that the way Germany developed over the centuries virtually ensured the evolution of a social and political order along the lines of Nazi Germany. In their view, German mentalities, the structure of society, and institutional developments followed a different course in comparison with the other nations of the West, which had a normal development of their histories. The German historian Heinrich August Winkler wrote about the question of there being a Sonderweg: “For a long time, educated Germans answered it in the positive, initially by laying claim to a special German mission, then, after the collapse of 1945, by criticizing Germany’s deviation from the West. Today, the negative view is predominant. Germany did not, according to the now prevailing opinion, differ from the great European nations to an extent that would justify speaking of a ‘unique German path’. And, in any case, no country on earth ever took what can be described as the ‘normal path'”.[1]

  • chen wolf

    It has been performed by countries including Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, North Korea, the United States, and the Soviet Union

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Martin van Creveld

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Martin van Creveld

    Martin van Creveld crop.jpg

    at the House of Commons, London

    (26 February 2008)

    Born 5 March 1946 (age 70)

    Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Nationality Israeli

    Fields Military history

    Military theory

    Alma mater London School of Economics

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Website

    martin-van-creveld.com

    Martin Levi van Creveld (Hebrew: מרטין ון קרפלד‎‎; born 5 March 1946) is an Israeli military historian and theorist.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Life and career

    2 Books

    3 Views on current affairs

    4 Published works

    5 References

    6 External links

    Life and career[edit]

    Van Creveld was born in the Netherlands in the city of Rotterdam to a Jewish family. His parents, Leon and Margaret, were staunch Zionists who had managed to evade the Nazis during World War II. One of Creveld’s uncles and several cousins were killed in the Holocaust.

    In 1950, his family emigrated to Israel, and Creveld grew up in Ramat Gan. He was drafted to the Israel Defense Forces and served in logistics, but was soon granted an early discharge for medical reasons due to his cleft palate. From 1964 to 1969, he studied history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and earned an MA. From 1969–71, he studied history at the London School of Economics and received a PhD.[1]

    Van Creveld’s doctoral dissertation on Hitler’s strategy in the Balkans during the early years of World War II was later published as a book. After completing his PhD in 1971, van Creveld returned to Israel and began teaching at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He became a professor in 1988. In 2007, he retired from teaching at Hebrew University, and began teaching at Tel Aviv University’s Security Studies Program.[2]

    Van Creveld has been married twice and has three children. He lives in Mevaseret Zion.[1]

    Books[edit]

    Van Creveld is the author of seventeen books on military history and strategy, of which Command in War (1985), Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (1977, 2nd edition 2004), The Transformation of War (1991), The Sword and the Olive (1998) and The Rise and Decline of the State (1999) are among the best known. Van Creveld has lectured or taught at many strategic institutes in the Western world, including the U.S. Naval War College.

    Of particular significance is his 1991 book The Transformation of War (UK: On Future War), which was translated into French, German (New German edition in 2004), Russian, and Spanish. In this treatise of military theory, van Creveld develops what he calls the non-trinitarian theory of warfare, which he juxtaposes to the famous work by Clausewitz, On War.[3]

    Clausewitz’s trinitarian model of war (a term of van Creveld’s) distinguishes between the affairs of the population, the army, and the government.[4] Van Creveld criticizes this philosophy as too narrow and state-focused, thus inapplicable to the study of those conflicts involving one or more non-state actors. Instead, he proposes five key issues of war:

    By whom war is fought – whether by states or by non-state actors

    What is war all about – the relationships between the actors, and between them and the non-combatants

    How war is fought – issues of strategy and tactics

    What war is fought for – whether to enhance national power, or as an end to itself

    Why war is fought – the motivations of the individual soldier.

    Van Creveld notes that many of the wars fought after 1945 were low-intensity conflicts (LICs) which powerful states ended up losing. The book argues that we are seeing a decline of the nation-state, without a comparable decline in organized violence. Moreover, in his view, armies consistently train and equip to fight a conventional war, rather than the LICs they are likely to face. Consequently, it is imperative that nation states change the training of their armed forces and rethink their weapon procurement programs.

    The book’s significance is attested to by the fact that until the middle of 2008, it was included on the list of required reading for United States Army officers, and (with Sun Tzu and Clausewitz) the third non-American entry on the list.[5] Van Creveld’s Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton is now included on the list as well.

    In a commander’s quest for certainty in battlefield information, Van Creveld popularized “directed telescope” as a term to describe the use of specially selected and trusted officers as special agents or observers for the commander”.[6][7]

    In addition to his books on military history, van Creveld has written one book on social issues – The Privileged Sex – which argues that the idea women are the oppressed gender is largely a myth, and that women, and not men, are the privileged gender.[8]

    Views on current affairs[edit]

    In addition to writing on military history, van Creveld also comments, often pointedly, on contemporary societies and politics.

    In a TV interview in 2002, he expressed doubts as to the ability of the Israeli army to defeat the Palestinians:

    They [Israeli soldiers] are very brave people… they are idealists… they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel… if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier, if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal.[9]

    In a September 2003 interview in Elsevier, a Dutch weekly, on Israel and the dangers it faces from Iran, the Palestinians and world opinion van Creveld stated:

    We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.[10]

    In the 21 August 2004 edition of the International Herald Tribune van Creveld wrote, “Had the Iranians not tried to build nuclear weapons, they would be crazy.”[11]

    In 2005, van Creveld made headlines when he said in an interview that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was “the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC [sic] sent his legions into Germany and lost them”, a reference to the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. His analysis included harsh criticism of the Bush Administration, comparing the war to the Vietnam war. Moreover, he said that “Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial.” [5]

    In 2007, van Creveld commented that

    Iran is the real victor in Iraq, and the world must now learn to live with a nuclear Iran the way we learned to live with a nuclear Soviet Union and a nuclear China…. We Israelis have what it takes to deter an Iranian attack. We are in no danger at all of having an Iranian nuclear weapon dropped on us…. thanks to the Iranian threat, we are getting weapons from the U.S. and Germany.[12]

    Van Creveld viewed the Second Lebanon War as a strategic success for Israel and a Hezbollah defeat. He was also highly critical of the Winograd Commission’s report for its failure to note the many successes brought about by Israel’s military campaign. He noted that Hezbollah “had the fight knocked out of it,” lost hundreds of its members and that the organization was “thrown out of South Lebanon,” replaced by “a fairly robust United Nations peacekeeping force.” He also noted that as a result of the war, Israel is experiencing a level of calm on its Lebanon border not seen since the mid-1960s.[13] More recently, in an article published in Infinity Journal in June 2011, titled “The Second Lebanon War: A Reassessment”, Martin van Creveld argued that contrary to the common view, and despite “clumsy, heavy-handed, and slow” ground operations, the Second Lebanon War was a great victory for Israel. He states that as a result of the war, “since the middle of August 2006, all over southern Lebanon hardly a shot has been fired.”[14]

    In an opinion piece published in The Jewish Daily Forward in 2010, van Creveld argued that the West Bank, far from being vital to Israel’s security, is a territory “that Israel can easily afford to give up.” Van Creveld contended that the West Bank offers no defense against ballistic missiles from Israel’s two chief enemies, Iran and Syria. Furthermore, provided that it would be demilitarized in any future peace settlement with the Palestinians, the West Bank would act as a natural barrier impeding the advance of any army endeavoring to invade Israel by land from the east. Lastly, Israel could defend itself against terrorism from the West Bank by means of a wall coupled with offensive campaigns the likes of Operation Cast Lead and the Second Lebanon War, which successfully restored Israel’s deterrence factor when the level of terrorism exceeded what Israel was willing to tolerate.[15] Stephen Kramer, Israel Correspondent for the Jewish Times of South Jersey, disputed the accuracy and relevance of figures cited by van Creveld in relation to Israel’s GDP and arms exports. Kramer, who lives in the Samarian settlement of Alfei Menashe, also argued that the Israeli army plays a crucial role fighting terrorism in the West Bank, whereas its absence could precipitate a Hamas “takeover” similar to the one that occurred in the wake of Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.[16] [Hamas won the democratic Palestinian election of 2006]

    In an article co-authored with Cambridge researcher of Middle Eastern history[17] Jason Pack addressing the 2011 Libyan civil war, van Creveld challenged the media’s tendency to portray the circumstances in Libya as being largely equivalent to those that formed the backdrop to the overthrow of ben-Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt earlier in the year. “The remarkable spread of the 2011 Arab revolts across the face of North Africa causes many journalists to portray the current Libyan uprising as fueled by similar factors to those at play in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt. There are more differences than similarities.” Van Creveld noted that Tunisia and Egypt “have been coherent nation-states for well over a century,” while Libyan society is still pervasively tribalist. He also observed that whereas the armies of Tunisia and Egypt could mediate the transitions between the old regimes and the new, “Libya lacks a professional, non-tribal army” that could function in such a role. Van Creveld blamed Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi for squandering a crucial opportunity to restore order to the country and confidence – both domestic and international – in the Gaddafi regime.[18]

    Van Creveld has stated that the Israeli government has “vastly exaggerated the threat that a nuclear Iran poses to its security, as well as Israel’s capacity to halt it.”[19]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Weimar Republic (German: Weimarer Republik [ˈvaɪmaʁɐ ʁepuˈbliːk] ( listen)) is an unofficial designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was the German Reich (Deutsches Reich), continuing the name from the pre-1918 German Empire.

    The republic was a semi-presidential representative democracy, which emerged in the aftermath of the German Revolution of 1918–19. A national assembly was convened in Weimar, where a new constitution for the German Reich was written, and adopted on 11 August 1919. In its fourteen years, the Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, including hyperinflation, political extremism (with paramilitaries – both left and right wing) and contentious relationships with the victors of the First World War. The people of Germany blamed the Weimar Republic rather than their wartime leaders for the country’s defeat and for the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, the Weimar Republic government successfully reformed the currency, unified tax policies, and organized the railway system. Weimar Germany eliminated most of the requirements of the Treaty of Versailles; it never completely met its disarmament requirements, and eventually paid only a small portion of the war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan).[4] Under the Locarno Treaties, Germany accepted the western borders of the republic, but continued to dispute the Eastern border.

    From 1930 onwards President Hindenburg used emergency powers to back Chancellors Heinrich Brüning, Franz von Papen and General Kurt von Schleicher. The Great Depression, worsened by Brüning’s policy of deflation, led to a surge in unemployment.[5] In 1933 Adolf Hitler became the new Chancellor of a coalition government, and Nazis held two out of the remaining ten cabinet seats. Von Papen as Vice Chancellor was intended to be the “éminence grise” who would keep Hitler under control, using his close personal connection to Hindenburg. Within months, however, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act of 1933 had brought about a state of emergency and wiped out constitutional civil liberties. Hitler’s seizure of power (Machtergreifung) allowed him to govern by decree without the involvement of the legislature. These events brought the Weimar Republic to an end, as democracy collapsed and a single-party state was created. The end of the Weimar Republic marked the beginning of Nazi Germany.

    Even so, German Foreign Office official Harry Graf Kessler had predicted as early as February 1919 that the Republic was doomed. “The paradox”, he wrote, “by which a Social Democratic Government allows itself and the capitalist cash-boxes to be defended by royalist officers and unemployed on the dole is altogether too crazy.”[6]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Kucinich

    Space Preservation Act of 2001

    Kucinich introduced the first Space Preservation Act, on October 2, 2001, with no cosponsors. The bill was designed to “preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind.” The bill was referred to the House Science, the House Armed Services, and the House International Relations committees. The bill died in committee (April 9, 2002) because of an unfavorable executive comment received from the Department of Defense.[112]

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

    National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state as well as other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism developed out of the influences of Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after German defeat in World War I.

    Nazism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of what Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.[2] It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, or “people’s community” based on national unity. The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum, while excluding those deemed either to be community aliens or foreign peoples. The term “National Socialism” arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of “socialism”, as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privately owned businesses of Aryans.

    The Nazi Party was founded as the Pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers’ Party on 5 January 1919. By the early 1920s, Adolf Hitler assumed control of the organization and renamed it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP) to broaden its appeal. The National Socialist Program, adopted in 1920, called for a united Greater Germany that would deny citizenship to Jews or those of Jewish descent, while also supporting land reform and the nationalization of some industries. In Mein Kampf, written in 1924, Hitler outlined the antisemitism and anti-communism at the heart of his political philosophy, as well as his disdain for parliamentary democracy and his belief in Germany’s right to territorial expansion.

    In 1933, with the support of traditional conservative nationalists, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and the Nazis gradually established a one-party state, under which Jews, political opponents and other “undesirable” elements were marginalized, with several millions eventually imprisoned and killed. Hitler purged the party’s more socially and economically radical factions in the mid-1934 Night of the Long Knives and, after the death of President Hindenburg, political power was concentrated in his hands, as Führer or “leader”. Following the Holocaust and German defeat in World War II, only a few fringe racist groups, usually referred to as neo-Nazis, still describe themselves as following National Socialism.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    WELSH: And what time period was this?

    GINTER: This was during the ʼ60s. This was, it started about 1965. In fact, let’s see what, here’s a book that describes the whole incident. It’s called The Rise and Fall of California’s Radical Prison Movement. This will give you the best description of what was going on in prison at that time. Also Jessica Mitford’s books will also give you a good interpretation. You want to turn it off? [pause]

    Cheryl wanted me to explain the process of how this thing was working, so that other prisoners will know that they’re being processed, also. The majority of the trauma was in the voices and when they turned up the volume into different parts of the body. They could make me feel that I couldn’t get off the bed, because they could use electromagnetic energy in my stomach. But mostly it was concentrated in my brain. And they knew everything I felt, everything I seen. I couldn’t even go to the bathroom. That’s the ultimate you know? No privacy whatsoever.

    The main thrust was to make me believe something that was going on that really wasn’t. In other words, to almost project a hallucination in the mind, to make you think something was going on that really isn’t. But I was always cognizant of what was going on in my mind. I had no far out superstition, so they couldn’t make me believe that say I was hearing from aliens or God or what have you, you know. But this technology is real and it’s been going on since the ‘50s, as I’ve been able to read. And now it’s widespread. It’s all over everywhere. I’m specifically interested in what’s going on in the prison system.

  • chen wolf

    Weimar Republic (German: Weimarer Republik [ˈvaɪmaʁɐ ʁepuˈbliːk] ( listen)) is an unofficial designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was the German Reich (Deutsches Reich), continuing the name from the pre-1918 German Empire.

    The republic was a semi-presidential representative democracy, which emerged in the aftermath of the German Revolution of 1918–19. A national assembly was convened in Weimar, where a new constitution for the German Reich was written, and adopted on 11 August 1919. In its fourteen years, the Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, including hyperinflation, political extremism (with paramilitaries – both left and right wing) and contentious relationships with the victors of the First World War. The people of Germany blamed the Weimar Republic rather than their wartime leaders for the country’s defeat and for the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, the Weimar Republic government successfully reformed the currency, unified tax policies, and organized the railway system. Weimar Germany eliminated most of the requirements of the Treaty of Versailles; it never completely met its disarmament requirements, and eventually paid only a small portion of the war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan).[4] Under the Locarno Treaties, Germany accepted the western borders of the republic, but continued to dispute the Eastern border.

    From 1930 onwards President Hindenburg used emergency powers to back Chancellors Heinrich Brüning, Franz von Papen and General Kurt von Schleicher. The Great Depression, worsened by Brüning’s policy of deflation, led to a surge in unemployment.[5] In 1933 Adolf Hitler became the new Chancellor of a coalition government, and Nazis held two out of the remaining ten cabinet seats. Von Papen as Vice Chancellor was intended to be the “éminence grise” who would keep Hitler under control, using his close personal connection to Hindenburg. Within months, however, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act of 1933 had brought about a state of emergency and wiped out constitutional civil liberties. Hitler’s seizure of power (Machtergreifung) allowed him to govern by decree without the involvement of the legislature. These events brought the Weimar Republic to an end, as democracy collapsed and a single-party state was created. The end of the Weimar Republic marked the beginning of Nazi Germany.

    Even so, German Foreign Office official Harry Graf Kessler had predicted as early as February 1919 that the Republic was doomed. “The paradox”, he wrote, “by which a Social Democratic Government allows itself and the capitalist cash-boxes to be defended by royalist officers and unemployed on the dole is altogether too crazy.”[6]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

    German Reich

    Deutsches Reich

    1918–1933 →

    Flag Coat of arms

    Anthem

    Das Lied der Deutschen

    “Song of the Germans”

    MENU0:00

    Germany in 1930

    German states during the Weimar Republic period

    Capital Berlin

    Languages German

    Religion Protestant (Lutheran, Reformed, Prussian United) majority;

    significant Roman Catholic and Jewish minorities

    Government 1919–30 Semi-presidential

    representative federal republic

    1930–33 De facto authoritarian

    rule by decree

    President

    • 1919–25 Friedrich Ebert

    • 1925–33 Paul von Hindenburg

    Chancellor

    • 1919 (first) Philipp Scheidemann

    • 1933 (last) Adolf Hitler

    Legislature Reichstag

    • State Council Reichsrat

    Historical era Interwar period

    • Established 9 November 1918

    • Government by decree begins 29 March 1930[1]

    • Hitler appointed Chancellor 30 January 1933

    • Reichstag fire 27 February 1933

    • Enabling Act 23 March 1933

    Area

    • 1925[2] 468,787 km² (181,000 sq mi)

    Population

    • 1925[2] est. 62,411,000

    Density 133.1 /km² (344.8 /sq mi)

    Currency

    1919–23 “Papiermark” (ℳ)

    1923–24 Rentenmark

    1924–33 Reichsmark (ℛℳ)

    Today part of

    Germany

    Poland

    Russia

    Belgium

    Netherlands

    The coat of arms shown above is the version used after 1928, which replaced that shown in the “Flag and coat of arms” section.[3]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Shabak Mossad and israel ilice proof themself as readl zionazis. 24 hours harassment bang noises constand from any flat any floor heared all over my flat, screaming angry bit 24 hours machine. abusing neighbour with vulgar angry voice sound they mimick what insteucted infront my door when I approach door. Zioanzis 247 neighbour harrassing by mossad nazis agents instrctions. The house destoyed.

  • chen wolf

    They control total police all neighbours abuse I have no protection from mossad nazis agents control all buildong all neioghbours. I read no whare such harassment to this degree outside state of Israel, proof mossad work in nazis methods.

  • chen wolf

    They try murdur me no touch torture via tottal control over environment so everyone is cirminal entire house is place of torture. No one open eyes on this criminals so they assure they can murdur me no one will do anything to stop this.

    I live near this criminals State of Israel is disgusting place. They the shank mossafd are more nazis then nazis themself. They are the cruelest in this agencies world wide. They friends of nazis and the biggest criminals of government exist today. They do far and beyond what they have to do this is sadistic maossad agents. They total don’t care suffer they are total psychopathic. They have total control, as niazs country over police so they can kill me and nothing happen to them I can say to police they want murdur me in my home and they will do nothng. The total control is form nazis era, this the behavior.

    He himself call this isranazis mosad agents and israley security sevices criminals, they are super criminals :

    Martin van Creveld

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Martin van Creveld

    Martin van Creveld crop.jpg

    at the House of Commons, London

    (26 February 2008)

    Born 5 March 1946 (age 70)

    Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Nationality Israeli

    Fields Military history

    Military theory

    Alma mater London School of Economics

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Website

    martin-van-creveld.com

    Martin Levi van Creveld (Hebrew: מרטין ון קרפלד‎‎; born 5 March 1946) is an Israeli military historian and theorist.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Life and career

    2 Books

    3 Views on current affairs

    4 Published works

    5 References

    6 External links

    Life and career[edit]

    Van Creveld was born in the Netherlands in the city of Rotterdam to a Jewish family. His parents, Leon and Margaret, were staunch Zionists who had managed to evade the Nazis during World War II. One of Creveld’s uncles and several cousins were killed in the Holocaust.

    In 1950, his family emigrated to Israel, and Creveld grew up in Ramat Gan. He was drafted to the Israel Defense Forces and served in logistics, but was soon granted an early discharge for medical reasons due to his cleft palate. From 1964 to 1969, he studied history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and earned an MA. From 1969–71, he studied history at the London School of Economics and received a PhD.[1]

    Van Creveld’s doctoral dissertation on Hitler’s strategy in the Balkans during the early years of World War II was later published as a book. After completing his PhD in 1971, van Creveld returned to Israel and began teaching at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He became a professor in 1988. In 2007, he retired from teaching at Hebrew University, and began teaching at Tel Aviv University’s Security Studies Program.[2]

    Van Creveld has been married twice and has three children. He lives in Mevaseret Zion.[1]

    Books[edit]

    Van Creveld is the author of seventeen books on military history and strategy, of which Command in War (1985), Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (1977, 2nd edition 2004), The Transformation of War (1991), The Sword and the Olive (1998) and The Rise and Decline of the State (1999) are among the best known. Van Creveld has lectured or taught at many strategic institutes in the Western world, including the U.S. Naval War College.

    Of particular significance is his 1991 book The Transformation of War (UK: On Future War), which was translated into French, German (New German edition in 2004), Russian, and Spanish. In this treatise of military theory, van Creveld develops what he calls the non-trinitarian theory of warfare, which he juxtaposes to the famous work by Clausewitz, On War.[3]

    Clausewitz’s trinitarian model of war (a term of van Creveld’s) distinguishes between the affairs of the population, the army, and the government.[4] Van Creveld criticizes this philosophy as too narrow and state-focused, thus inapplicable to the study of those conflicts involving one or more non-state actors. Instead, he proposes five key issues of war:

    By whom war is fought – whether by states or by non-state actors

    What is war all about – the relationships between the actors, and between them and the non-combatants

    How war is fought – issues of strategy and tactics

    What war is fought for – whether to enhance national power, or as an end to itself

    Why war is fought – the motivations of the individual soldier.

    Van Creveld notes that many of the wars fought after 1945 were low-intensity conflicts (LICs) which powerful states ended up losing. The book argues that we are seeing a decline of the nation-state, without a comparable decline in organized violence. Moreover, in his view, armies consistently train and equip to fight a conventional war, rather than the LICs they are likely to face. Consequently, it is imperative that nation states change the training of their armed forces and rethink their weapon procurement programs.

    The book’s significance is attested to by the fact that until the middle of 2008, it was included on the list of required reading for United States Army officers, and (with Sun Tzu and Clausewitz) the third non-American entry on the list.[5] Van Creveld’s Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton is now included on the list as well.

    In a commander’s quest for certainty in battlefield information, Van Creveld popularized “directed telescope” as a term to describe the use of specially selected and trusted officers as special agents or observers for the commander”.[6][7]

    In addition to his books on military history, van Creveld has written one book on social issues – The Privileged Sex – which argues that the idea women are the oppressed gender is largely a myth, and that women, and not men, are the privileged gender.[8]

    Views on current affairs[edit]

    In addition to writing on military history, van Creveld also comments, often pointedly, on contemporary societies and politics.

    In a TV interview in 2002, he expressed doubts as to the ability of the Israeli army to defeat the Palestinians:

    They [Israeli soldiers] are very brave people… they are idealists… they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel… if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier, if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal.[9]

    In a September 2003 interview in Elsevier, a Dutch weekly, on Israel and the dangers it faces from Iran, the Palestinians and world opinion van Creveld stated:

    We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.[10]

    In the 21 August 2004 edition of the International Herald Tribune van Creveld wrote, “Had the Iranians not tried to build nuclear weapons, they would be crazy.”[11]

    In 2005, van Creveld made headlines when he said in an interview that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was “the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC [sic] sent his legions into Germany and lost them”, a reference to the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. His analysis included harsh criticism of the Bush Administration, comparing the war to the Vietnam war. Moreover, he said that “Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial.” [5]

    In 2007, van Creveld commented that

    Iran is the real victor in Iraq, and the world must now learn to live with a nuclear Iran the way we learned to live with a nuclear Soviet Union and a nuclear China…. We Israelis have what it takes to deter an Iranian attack. We are in no danger at all of having an Iranian nuclear weapon dropped on us…. thanks to the Iranian threat, we are getting weapons from the U.S. and Germany.[12]

    Van Creveld viewed the Second Lebanon War as a strategic success for Israel and a Hezbollah defeat. He was also highly critical of the Winograd Commission’s report for its failure to note the many successes brought about by Israel’s military campaign. He noted that Hezbollah “had the fight knocked out of it,” lost hundreds of its members and that the organization was “thrown out of South Lebanon,” replaced by “a fairly robust United Nations peacekeeping force.” He also noted that as a result of the war, Israel is experiencing a level of calm on its Lebanon border not seen since the mid-1960s.[13] More recently, in an article published in Infinity Journal in June 2011, titled “The Second Lebanon War: A Reassessment”, Martin van Creveld argued that contrary to the common view, and despite “clumsy, heavy-handed, and slow” ground operations, the Second Lebanon War was a great victory for Israel. He states that as a result of the war, “since the middle of August 2006, all over southern Lebanon hardly a shot has been fired.”[14]

    In an opinion piece published in The Jewish Daily Forward in 2010, van Creveld argued that the West Bank, far from being vital to Israel’s security, is a territory “that Israel can easily afford to give up.” Van Creveld contended that the West Bank offers no defense against ballistic missiles from Israel’s two chief enemies, Iran and Syria. Furthermore, provided that it would be demilitarized in any future peace settlement with the Palestinians, the West Bank would act as a natural barrier impeding the advance of any army endeavoring to invade Israel by land from the east. Lastly, Israel could defend itself against terrorism from the West Bank by means of a wall coupled with offensive campaigns the likes of Operation Cast Lead and the Second Lebanon War, which successfully restored Israel’s deterrence factor when the level of terrorism exceeded what Israel was willing to tolerate.[15] Stephen Kramer, Israel Correspondent for the Jewish Times of South Jersey, disputed the accuracy and relevance of figures cited by van Creveld in relation to Israel’s GDP and arms exports. Kramer, who lives in the Samarian settlement of Alfei Menashe, also argued that the Israeli army plays a crucial role fighting terrorism in the West Bank, whereas its absence could precipitate a Hamas “takeover” similar to the one that occurred in the wake of Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.[16] [Hamas won the democratic Palestinian election of 2006]

    In an article co-authored with Cambridge researcher of Middle Eastern history[17] Jason Pack addressing the 2011 Libyan civil war, van Creveld challenged the media’s tendency to portray the circumstances in Libya as being largely equivalent to those that formed the backdrop to the overthrow of ben-Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt earlier in the year. “The remarkable spread of the 2011 Arab revolts across the face of North Africa causes many journalists to portray the current Libyan uprising as fueled by similar factors to those at play in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt. There are more differences than similarities.” Van Creveld noted that Tunisia and Egypt “have been coherent nation-states for well over a century,” while Libyan society is still pervasively tribalist. He also observed that whereas the armies of Tunisia and Egypt could mediate the transitions between the old regimes and the new, “Libya lacks a professional, non-tribal army” that could function in such a role. Van Creveld blamed Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi for squandering a crucial opportunity to restore order to the country and confidence – both domestic and international – in the Gaddafi regime.[18]

    Van Creveld has stated that the Israeli government has “vastly exaggerated the threat that a nuclear Iran poses to its security, as well as Israel’s capacity to halt it.”[19]

  • chen wolf

    I in titla suffer and all I hear is AI reepat as idiot on terms related to war and humiliation, and neighbuors abuse me no touch torture via sound of psychopathic from any flat any floor and AI radiating me.

    They treat people as dogs, this mossad agents. They total don’t care your suffer, this is monsters, non humnas agents.

  • chen wolf

    THis not hour not a day not a week not a month not a year but decade they wait me to dire but since they check when I suicide and not let it happen I don’;t know what to do even suicide they check will not happen.

    I need move to place whre no total control exist but in this coutnry I don’t know any such place.

    This hav etotal control over 1 people, at least nazis soviets want this for any 1 i nsociety, they are playing god and satanistic experimetns, all they do is show how thus agencies composed of monsters sadistics psychopathics world wide they are dangerous to the whole world this agencies.

  • chen wolf

    TOTAL regime was impossible it possible bia modern technologies. It what happen now, in most sadistic psychopathic way possible from this criminal dangerous to the whole world agenciees. They think we are humans, as dogs.

  • chen wolf

    THey plan kill themself the citizens of country, for example this way they each country can bomb citizens with atomic bomb, why noty they not care suffer not care anything if they think it justified, they will make reality plan as kill 90% of their own citizens for world wide dangerous psychopathic agenda- they do it now for 50 years with no any human thinking about what they do.

  • chen wolf

    Israel is country with atomic bomb, this nazis sadistics psychopath are who have such dangerous weapon.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://poisonedbygangstalkers.com/

    Poisoned By Gang Stalkers

    I am Eldon J. Brown (The All Star Activist) and this is a blog devoted exclusively to detailing my experiences of being poisoned by Gang Stalkers. “Giftgas” (translated from the German as “poison gas”) was the Zyklon-B brand of cyanide gas pesticide used by the Nazi’s to murder Jewish prisoners in the Concentration Camp showers. The poisoning that is happening to both myself, as well as other Targeted Individuals all over the world, is analogous. The late actress Mrs. Brittany Murphy and her late husband Mr. Simon Monjack are glaring examples of this type of poisoning. I apologize for the use of Nazi imagery but I think it most effectively conveys our current situation here in the United States. Just as Germany went way back in the thirties, so have we continued here in the USA today. My main blog is The All Star Activist.

  • chen wolf

    Poisoned By Gang Stalkers

    I am Eldon J. Brown (The All Star Activist) and this is a blog devoted exclusively to detailing my experiences of being poisoned by Gang Stalkers. “Giftgas” (translated from the German as “poison gas”) was the Zyklon-B brand of cyanide gas pesticide used by the Nazi’s to murder Jewish prisoners in the Concentration Camp showers. The poisoning that is happening to both myself, as well as other Targeted Individuals all over the world, is analogous. The late actress Mrs. Brittany Murphy and her late husband Mr. Simon Monjack are glaring examples of this type of poisoning. I apologize for the use of Nazi imagery but I think it most effectively conveys our current situation here in the United States. Just as Germany went way back in the thirties, so have we continued here in the USA today. My main blog is The All Star Activist.

  • chen wolf

    Poisoned By Gang Stalkers

    I am Eldon J. Brown (The All Star Activist) and this is a blog devoted exclusively to detailing my experiences of being poisoned by Gang Stalkers. “Giftgas” (translated from the German as “poison gas”) was the Zyklon-B brand of cyanide gas pesticide used by the Nazi’s to murder Jewish prisoners in the Concentration Camp showers. The poisoning that is happening to both myself, as well as other Targeted Individuals all over the world, is analogous. The late actress Mrs. Brittany Murphy and her late husband Mr. Simon Monjack are glaring examples of this type of poisoning. I apologize for the use of Nazi imagery but I think it most effectively conveys our current situation here in the United States. Just as Germany went way back in the thirties, so have we continued here in the USA today. My main blog is The All Star Activist.

    • Carl Herman

      You’re posting hundreds of comments, chen wolf. I deleted some of the video clips, as I feel they are not directly related to our topic.

  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • YouAFool.com

    RFIDs are outdated, you can find out more about so called “uninvasive” technology like this on http://youafool.com

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://ref-inst.org/%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A4%D7%95%D7%99-%D7%9E%D7%AA%D7%97%D7%9E%D7%99-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99-%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C/

    Mapping Poverty in Israel complexes

    August 19, 2015 The Institute for Structural Reform

    The complete document (PDF)

    Poverty compounds list (Excel)

    List complexes “Renewal” (Excel)

    Map Aintrartibit of poverty complexes

    The authors: Omar Tal

    High concentration of poor regional basis empowering the problem encountered by the poor. This document will show the latest list of complexes of poverty in Israel, for the purpose of monitoring, research and targeting slum rehabilitation policy and eradicating poverty. For comparison purposes, will also be a list of compounds in which currently takes place in the urban renewal project of the Ministry of Construction.

    Lists compounds

    Poverty compounds the list contains 195 compounds, of which 42 are whole communities, each of which is a single compound. Complex compounds from -524 statistical areas. As of 2013, these compounds had lived about two million people. List complexes Renewal contains 95 compounds. Complex compounds from -311 statistical areas. As of 2013, these compounds resided million people.

    Major findings

    Arabs and ultra-Orthodox population significantly over-represented in poverty complexes: three times and twice their proportion in the general population, respectively. The percentage of non-ultra-Orthodox Jews from the slum population of more than half lower than the percentage in the general population. Population distribution complexes Renewal population is closer to that in the general population.

    Breakdown of households by population group, 2013

    North province there is overrepresented in the number of compounds, with 28% of the compounds compared to 17% of the general population. Central District representation: the Central Region compounds population is about half provided that the rate in the general population. In contrast, compounds Renewal District has overrepresented and underrepresented southern districts of Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria.

    Population distribution of compounds by Region, 2013

    The four highest deciles represent 14% of the population in poverty complexes, while the four lowest deciles represent 68% of the population. Lesson four lowest deciles of the population of complexes Renewal is 52% – more than their proportion in the general population, but much less of a population of complexes of poverty.

    Distribution of households by income quintiles, 2008

    Poverty compounds population education and employment figures are low. Renewal population data are better, but still lower than in the general population.

    Inequality, housing, urban renewal, religious, national housing policy, the eradication of poverty, segregation, poverty, assets, Arabs, slums

    Google Translate לעסקים:כלי תרגוםמתרגם אתרמאתר השווקים הגלובלי

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/14/upshot/the-lack-of-major-wars-may-be-hurting-economic-growth.html?_r=0

    Today the major slow-growing Western European nations have very little fear of being taken over militarily, and thus their politicians don’t face extreme penalties for continuing stagnation. Instead, losing office often means a boost in income from speaking or consulting fees or a comfortable retirement in a pleasant vacation spot. Japan, by comparison, is faced with territorial and geopolitical pressures from China, and in response it is attempting a national revitalization through the economic policies of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_W._Tuchman

    Tuchman’s Law[edit]

    In the introduction to her 1978 book A Distant Mirror, Tuchman playfully identified a historical phenomenon which she termed “Tuchman’s Law,” to wit:

    Disaster is rarely as pervasive as it seems from recorded accounts. The fact of being on the record makes it appear continuous and ubiquitous whereas it is more likely to have been sporadic both in time and place. Besides, persistence of the normal is usually greater than the effect of the disturbance, as we know from our own times. After absorbing the news of today, one expects to face a world consisting entirely of strikes, crimes, power failures, broken water mains, stalled trains, school shutdowns, muggers, drug addicts, neo-Nazis, and rapists. The fact is that one can come home in the evening — on a lucky day — without having encountered more than one or two of these phenomena. This has led me to formulate Tuchman’s Law, as follows: “The fact of being reported multiplies the apparent extent of any deplorable development by five- to tenfold” (or any figure the reader would care to supply).[11]

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    Tuchman’s Law has been defined as a psychological principle of “perceptual readiness” or “subjective probability”.[12]

  • chen wolf

    THE PITFALLS OF PEACE

    The Lack of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth

    Tyler Cowen JUNE 13, 2014

    Continue reading the main storyShare This Page

    Share

    Tweet

    Email

    More

    Save

    300

    Photo

    Nikita Khrushchev and East German leaders with a Sputnik 3 replica in 1959. Credit Bettmann/Corbis

    The continuing slowness of economic growth in high-income economies has prompted soul-searching among economists. They have looked to weak demand, rising inequality, Chinese competition, over-regulation, inadequate infrastructure and an exhaustion of new technological ideas as possible culprits.

    An additional explanation of slow growth is now receiving attention, however. It is the persistence and expectation of peace.

    The world just hasn’t had that much warfare lately, at least not by historical standards. Some of the recent headlines about Iraq or South Sudan make our world sound like a very bloody place, but today’s casualties pale in light of the tens of millions of people killed in the two world wars in the first half of the 20th century. Even the Vietnam War had many more deaths than any recent war involving an affluent country.

    Counterintuitive though it may sound, the greater peacefulness of the world may make the attainment of higher rates of economic growth less urgent and thus less likely. This view does not claim that fighting wars improves economies, as of course the actual conflict brings death and destruction. The claim is also distinct from the Keynesian argument that preparing for war lifts government spending and puts people to work. Rather, the very possibility of war focuses the attention of governments on getting some basic decisions right — whether investing in science or simply liberalizing the economy. Such focus ends up improving a nation’s longer-run prospects.

    It may seem repugnant to find a positive side to war in this regard, but a look at American history suggests we cannot dismiss the idea so easily. Fundamental innovations such as nuclear power, the computer and the modern aircraft were all pushed along by an American government eager to defeat the Axis powers or, later, to win the Cold War. The Internet was initially designed to help this country withstand a nuclear exchange, and Silicon Valley had its origins with military contracting, not today’s entrepreneurial social media start-ups. The Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite spurred American interest in science and technology, to the benefit of later economic growth.

    War brings an urgency that governments otherwise fail to summon. For instance, the Manhattan Project took six years to produce a working atomic bomb, starting from virtually nothing, and at its peak consumed 0.4 percent of American economic output. It is hard to imagine a comparably speedy and decisive achievement these days.

    As a teenager in the 1970s, I heard talk about the desirability of rebuilding the Tappan Zee Bridge. Now, a replacement is scheduled to open no earlier than 2017, at least — provided that concerns about an endangered sturgeon can be addressed. Kennedy Airport remains dysfunctional, and La Guardia is hardly cutting edge, hobbling air transit in and out of New York. The $800 billion stimulus bill, in response to the recession, has not changed this basic situation.

    A Safer World

    The number of people who have died in wars has declined sharply since the 20th century.

    Battle-related deaths per 100,000 people*

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    0.3

    1950

    1955

    1960

    1965

    1970

    1975

    1980

    1985

    1990

    1995

    2000

    2005

    2010

    * Soldiers plus civilians caught in crossfire; does not include disease- or famine-related deaths in war

    Source: Steven Pinker, Harvard University, based on data from the Human Security Report Project at Simon Fraser University,

    Today the major slow-growing Western European nations have very little fear of being taken over militarily, and thus their politicians don’t face extreme penalties for continuing stagnation. Instead, losing office often means a boost in income from speaking or consulting fees or a comfortable retirement in a pleasant vacation spot. Japan, by comparison, is faced with territorial and geopolitical pressures from China, and in response it is attempting a national revitalization through the economic policies of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

    Ian Morris, a professor of classics and history at Stanford, has revived the hypothesis that war is a significant factor behind economic growth in his recent book, “War! What Is it Good For? Conflict and the Progress of Civilization From Primates to Robots.” Morris considers a wide variety of cases, including the Roman Empire, the European state during its Renaissance rise and the contemporary United States. In each case there is good evidence that the desire to prepare for war spurred technological invention and also brought a higher degree of internal social order.

    Another new book, Kwasi Kwarteng’s “War and Gold: A 500-Year History of Empires, Adventures, and Debt,” makes a similar argument but focuses on capital markets. Mr. Kwarteng, a Conservative member of British Parliament, argues that the need to finance wars led governments to help develop monetary and financial institutions, enabling the rise of the West. He does worry, however, that today many governments are abusing these institutions and using them to take on too much debt. (Both Mr. Kwarteng and Mr. Morris are extending themes from Azar Gat’s 820-page magnum opus, “War in Human Civilization,” published in 2006.)

    Yet another investigation of the hypothesis appears in a recent working paper by the economists Chiu Yu Ko, Mark Koyama and Tuan-Hwee Sng. The paper argues that Europe evolved as more politically fragmented than China because China’s risk of conquest from its western flank led it toward political centralization for purposes of defense. This centralization was useful at first but eventually held China back. The European countries invested more in technology and modernization, precisely because they were afraid of being taken over by their nearby rivals.

    But here is the catch: Whatever the economic benefits of potential conflict might have been, the calculus is different today. Technologies have become much more destructive, and so a large-scale war would be a bigger disaster than before. That makes many wars less likely, which is a good thing, but it also makes economic stagnation easier to countenance.

    There is a more optimistic read to all this than may first appear. Arguably the contemporary world is trading some growth in material living standards for peace — a relative paucity of war deaths and injuries, even with a kind of associated laziness.

    We can prefer higher rates of economic growth and progress, even while recognizing that recent G.D.P. figures do not adequately measure all of the gains we have been enjoying. In addition to more peace, we also have a cleaner environment (along most but not all dimensions), more leisure time and a higher degree of social tolerance for minorities and formerly persecuted groups. Our more peaceful and — yes — more slacker-oriented world is in fact better than our economic measures acknowledge.

    Living in a largely peaceful world with 2 percent G.D.P. growth has some big advantages that you don’t get with 4 percent growth and many more war deaths. Economic stasis may not feel very impressive, but it’s something our ancestors never quite managed to pull off. The real questions are whether we can do any better, and whether the recent prevalence of peace is a mere temporary bubble just waiting to be burst.

  • chen wolf

    Barbara W. Tuchman

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Barbara W. Tuchman

    Tuchman-portrait.jpg

    Born Barbara Wertheim

    January 30, 1912

    New York City

    Died February 6, 1989 (aged 77)

    Greenwich, Connecticut

    Occupation Writer, journalist, historian

    Nationality American

    Period 1938–1988 (writer)

    Genre History

    Subject Middle Ages, Renaissance, American Revolution, 1900, World War I

    Spouse Lester R. Tuchman

    (b. 1904, d. 1997)

    Children Three daughters

    Relatives Maurice Wertheim (father)

    Henry Morgenthau Sr.

    (maternal grandfather)

    Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

    (maternal uncle)

    Robert M. Morgenthau (cousin)

    Jessica Mathews (daughter)

    Barbara Wertheim Tuchman (/ˈtʌkmən/; January 30, 1912 – February 6, 1989) was an American historian and author. She won the Pulitzer Prize twice, for The Guns of August (1962), a best-selling history of the prelude to and the first month of World War I, and Stilwell and the American Experience in China (1971), a biography of General Joseph Stilwell.[1]

    Tuchman focused on writing popular history.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Biography

    1.1 Early years

    1.2 Researcher and journalist

    1.3 Historian

    1.4 Death and legacy

    2 Tuchman’s Law

    3 Publications

    3.1 Books

    3.2 Other works

    4 Footnotes

    5 External links

    Biography[edit]

    Early years[edit]

    Barbara Wertheim Tuchman was born January 30, 1912, the daughter of the banker Maurice Wertheim and his first wife Alma Morgenthau. Her father was an individual of wealth and prestige, the owner of The Nation magazine, president of the American Jewish Congress, prominent art collector, and a founder of the Theatre Guild.[2] Her mother was the daughter of Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Woodrow Wilson’s ambassador to the Ottoman Empire.[2]

    Wertheim was influenced at an early age by the books of Lucy Fitch Perkins, G.A. Henty, and Wolfe, as well as the historical novels of Dumas.[2] She attended the Walden School on Manhattan’s Upper West Side.[3] She received her Bachelor of Arts from Radcliffe College in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1933, having studied history and literature.[2]

    Researcher and journalist[edit]

    Following graduation, Wertheim worked as a volunteer research assistant at the Institute of Pacific Relations in New York, spending a year in Tokyo in 1934-35, including a month in China, before returning to the United States via the Trans-Siberian Railway to Moscow and on to Paris.[2] She also contributed to The Nation as a correspondent until her father’s sale of the publication in 1937, traveling to Valencia and Madrid to cover the Spanish Civil War.[4] A first book resulted from her Spanish experience, The Lost British Policy: Britain and Spain Since 1700, published in 1938.

    In 1940 Wertheim married Lester R. Tuchman (taking his surname), an internist, medical researcher and professor of clinical medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Manhattan. They had three daughters, including Jessica Mathews, a former president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.[5]

    During the years of World War II, Tuchman worked in the Office of War Information.[2] Following the war, Tuchman spent the next decade working to raise the children while doing basic research for what would ultimately become the 1956 book Bible and Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour.[2]

    Historian[edit]

    With the publication of Bible and Sword in 1956, Tuchman dedicated herself to historical research and writing, turning out a new book approximately every four years.[2] Rather than feeling hampered by the lack of an advanced degree in history, Tuchman argued that freedom from the rigors and expectations of academia was actually liberating, as the norms of academic writing would have “stifled any writing capacity.”[2]

    Tuchman favored a literary approach to the writing of history, providing eloquent explanatory narratives rather than concentration upon discovery and publication of fresh archival sources. In the words of one biographer, Tuchman was “not a historian’s historian; she was a layperson’s historian who made the past interesting to millions of readers.”[6] Tuchman’s storytelling prowess was rewarded in 1963 when she received the Pulitzer Prize for her book The Guns of August, dealing with the behind-the-scenes political machinations which led to the eruption of World War I in the summer of 1914.

    Tuchman would receive a second Pulitzer in 1972 for her biography of Joseph Stilwell, Stilwell and the American Experience in China.

    In 1978, Tuchman was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[7] She won a U.S. National Book Award in History[8] for the first paperback edition of A Distant Mirror in 1980.[9]

    Also in 1980 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) selected Tuchman for the Jefferson Lecture, the U.S. federal government’s highest honor for achievement in the humanities. Tuchman’s lecture was entitled “Mankind’s Better Moments”.[10]

    Tuchman was a trustee of Radcliffe College and a lecturer at Harvard, the University of California, and the Naval War College. Although she never received a formal graduate degree in history, Tuchman was the recipient of a number of honorary degrees from leading American universities, including Yale, Harvard, New York University, Columbia, Boston University, and Smith College, among others.[2]

    Death and legacy[edit]

    Barbara Tuchman died February 6, 1989 in Greenwich, Connecticut following a stroke.[2] She was 77 years old at the time of her death.

    Tuchman is best remembered as a two-time winner of the illustrious Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction, first for The Guns of August in 1963, and again for Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–45 in 1972.[1]

    A tower of Currier House, a residential division first of Radcliffe College and now of Harvard College was named in her honor.

    Tuchman’s Law[edit]

    In the introduction to her 1978 book A Distant Mirror, Tuchman playfully identified a historical phenomenon which she termed “Tuchman’s Law,” to wit:

    Disaster is rarely as pervasive as it seems from recorded accounts. The fact of being on the record makes it appear continuous and ubiquitous whereas it is more likely to have been sporadic both in time and place. Besides, persistence of the normal is usually greater than the effect of the disturbance, as we know from our own times. After absorbing the news of today, one expects to face a world consisting entirely of strikes, crimes, power failures, broken water mains, stalled trains, school shutdowns, muggers, drug addicts, neo-Nazis, and rapists. The fact is that one can come home in the evening — on a lucky day — without having encountered more than one or two of these phenomena. This has led me to formulate Tuchman’s Law, as follows: “The fact of being reported multiplies the apparent extent of any deplorable development by five- to tenfold” (or any figure the reader would care to supply).[11]

    Tuchman’s Law has been defined as a psychological principle of “perceptual readiness” or “subjective probability”.[12]

    Publications[edit]

    Books[edit]

    The Lost British Policy: Britain and Spain Since 1700. London: United Editorial, 1938. OCLC 1437885

    Bible and Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour. New York: New York University Press, 1956. OCLC 445506

    The Zimmerman Telegram. New York: Viking Press, 1958. OCLC 221110341

    The Guns of August. New York: Macmillan, 1962. OCLC 781625312

    The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War, 1890–1914. New York: Macmillan, 1966. ISBN 0345405013

    Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–45 (1971) OCLC 109537

    Notes from China. New York: Collier, 1972. OCLC 570634

    A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous Fourteenth Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978. ISBN 0394400267

    Practicing History: Selected Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981. ISBN 0394520866

    The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Knopf/Random House, 1984. ISBN 0394527771

    The First Salute: A View of the American Revolution. New York: Knopf/Random House, 1988. ISBN 0394553330

    Other works[edit]

    America’s Security in the 1980s. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1982.

    The Book: A Lecture Sponsored by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress and the Authors’ League of America, Presented at the Library of Congress, October 17, 1979. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1980.

  • chen wolf

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_Cowen

    Tyler Cowen

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Tyler Cowen

    Tyler Cowen 1.jpg

    Born January 21, 1962 (age 54)

    Nationality American

    Field Cultural economics

    School or

    tradition Neoclassical economics

    Influences Chicago School

    Thomas Schelling

    Carl Menger

    Tyler Cowen (/ˈkaʊ.ən/; born January 21, 1962) is an American economist, academic, and writer. He occupies the Holbert C. Harris Chair of economics, as a professor at George Mason University, and is co-author, with Alex Tabarrok, of the popular economics blog Marginal Revolution. Cowen and Tabarrok have also ventured into online education by starting Marginal Revolution University. He currently writes the “Economic Scene” column for the New York Times. He also writes for such publications as The New Republic, the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Newsweek, and the Wilson Quarterly. Cowen also serves as general director of George Mason’s Mercatus Center, a university research center that focuses on the market economy. In February 2011, Cowen received a nomination as one of the most influential economists in the last decade in a survey by The Economist.[1] He was ranked #72 among the “Top 100 Global Thinkers” in 2011 by Foreign Policy Magazine “for finding markets in everything.”[2]

    Contents [hide]

    1 Education and personal life

    2 Writings

    2.1 Culture

    2.2 Recent books

    2.3 New York Times columns

    2.4 Dining guide

    3 Political philosophy

    4 Attack

    5 Publications

    5.1 Books

    5.2 Select journal articles

    5.3 Select articles

    6 References

    7 External links

    Education and personal life[edit]

    Cowen was born in Bergen County,[3] New Jersey on January 21, 1962. At the age of 15, he became the youngest ever New Jersey state chess champion.[4][5] He graduated from George Mason University with a bachelor of science degree in economics in 1983 and received his PhD in economics from Harvard University in 1987 with his thesis titled Essays in the theory of welfare economics. At Harvard, he was mentored by game theorist Thomas Schelling, the 2005 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics. He is married to Natasha Cowen, a lawyer.

    Writings[edit]

    Culture[edit]

    The Los Angeles Times has described Cowen as “a man who can talk about Haitian voodoo flags, Iranian cinema, Hong Kong cuisine, Abstract Expressionism, Zairian music and Mexican folk art with seemingly equal facility”.[6] One of Cowen’s primary research interests is the economics of culture. He has written books on fame (What Price Fame?), art (In Praise of Commercial Culture), and cultural trade (Creative Destruction: How Globalization is Changing the World’s Cultures). In Markets and Cultural Voices, he relays how globalization is changing the world of three Mexican amate painters. Cowen argues that free markets change culture for the better, allowing them to evolve into something more people want. Other books include Public Goods and Market Failures, The Theory of Market Failure, Explorations in the New Monetary Economics, Risk and Business Cycles, Economic Welfare, and New Theories of Market Failure.

    Recent books[edit]

    Cowen followed the controversial success of his 2011 work, The Great Stagnation with An Economist Gets Lunch: New Rules for Everyday Foodies “taking on food with equally provocative ideas.”[7]

    The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All The Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better is a short, 15,000-word take on the United States’ recent economic trajectory released in January 2011. Create Your Own Economy: The Path to Prosperity in a Disordered World was released in July 2009 (and rereleased in 2010 with the new title The Age of the Infovore: Succeeding in the Information Economy) and received favorable reviews from critics including Matthew Yglesias and Tim Harford.

    In 2013 he published Average is Over on the future of modern economies.

    New York Times columns[edit]

    Cowen’s New York Times columns cover a wide range of issues, including the 2008 financial crisis, “Too Few Regulations? No, Just Ineffective Ones”.

    Dining guide[edit]

    His dining guide for the D.C. area, “Tyler Cowen’s Ethnic Dining Guide”, was reprinted in the Food section of the Washington Post.

    Political philosophy[edit]

    Cowen has written papers in political philosophy and ethics: for example, he co-wrote a paper with the philosopher Derek Parfit, arguing against the social discount rate.[8] A recent paper has argued that the epistemic problem fails to refute consequentialist forms of argument.[9] Cowen has been described as a “libertarian bargainer”, someone of moderate libertarian[clarification needed] ideals who can influence practical policy making.[10] In a 2007 article entitled “The Paradox of Libertarianism,” Cowen argued that libertarians “should embrace a world with growing wealth, growing positive liberty, and yes, growing government. We don’t have to favor the growth in government per se, but we do need to recognize that sometimes it is a package deal”. His argument was subsequently criticized by Bryan Caplan,[11] Justin Raimondo,[12] Christopher Westley,[13] Edward Stringham,[14] and Doug MacKenzie.[15] Cowen recognizes that stateless societies exist, but questions whether they are viable in the long run.[16] Economist Edward Stringham has criticized Cowen on this point, arguing Zomia has existed as a state-less society for centuries.[14]

    Cowen endorsed bailouts in a March 2, 2009 column in the New York Times.[17] He was a supporter of the Iraq War.[18]

    In 2012, David Brooks called Cowen one of the most influential bloggers on the right, writing that he is among those who “start from broadly libertarian premises but do not apply them in a doctrinaire way.”[19]

    In an August 2014 blog post, Cowen wrote, “Just to summarize, I generally favor much more immigration but not open borders, I am a liberal on most but not all social issues, and I am market-oriented on economic issues. On most current foreign policy issues I am genuinely agnostic as to what exactly we should do but skeptical that we are doing the right thing at the moment. I don’t like voting for either party or for third parties.”[20]

    Attack[edit]

    On March 26, 2014, Cowen was attacked whilst teaching “Law and Literature” in his classroom by Jonathan Pendleton, who tried to perform a “citizen’s arrest” of the professor and then pepper sprayed him.[21][22][23] A bystander intervened and Pendelton was detained and arrested shortly after by police. Cowen and his students reportedly suffered no lasting injuries. Pendelton reportedly believed that Cowen had “controlled his mind at a distance” and sexually harassed him.[23]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Mossad agents

  • chen wolf

    Gang stalking neighbours

  • chen wolf

    Mossad agents Gang stalking neighbours

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    THE PITFALLS OF PEACE

    The Lack of Major Wars May Be Hurting Economic Growth

    Tyler Cowen JUNE 13, 2014

    Continue reading the main storyShare This Page

    Share

    Tweet

    Email

    More

    Save

    300

    Photo

    Nikita Khrushchev and East German leaders with a Sputnik 3 replica in 1959. Credit Bettmann/Corbis

    The continuing slowness of economic growth in high-income economies has prompted soul-searching among economists. They have looked to weak demand, rising inequality, Chinese competition, over-regulation, inadequate infrastructure and an exhaustion of new technological ideas as possible culprits.

    An additional explanation of slow growth is now receiving attention, however. It is the persistence and expectation of peace.

    The world just hasn’t had that much warfare lately, at least not by historical standards. Some of the recent headlines about Iraq or South Sudan make our world sound like a very bloody place, but today’s casualties pale in light of the tens of millions of people killed in the two world wars in the first half of the 20th century. Even the Vietnam War had many more deaths than any recent war involving an affluent country.

    Counterintuitive though it may sound, the greater peacefulness of the world may make the attainment of higher rates of economic growth less urgent and thus less likely. This view does not claim that fighting wars improves economies, as of course the actual conflict brings death and destruction. The claim is also distinct from the Keynesian argument that preparing for war lifts government spending and puts people to work. Rather, the very possibility of war focuses the attention of governments on getting some basic decisions right — whether investing in science or simply liberalizing the economy. Such focus ends up improving a nation’s longer-run prospects.

    It may seem repugnant to find a positive side to war in this regard, but a look at American history suggests we cannot dismiss the idea so easily. Fundamental innovations such as nuclear power, the computer and the modern aircraft were all pushed along by an American government eager to defeat the Axis powers or, later, to win the Cold War. The Internet was initially designed to help this country withstand a nuclear exchange, and Silicon Valley had its origins with military contracting, not today’s entrepreneurial social media start-ups. The Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite spurred American interest in science and technology, to the benefit of later economic growth.

    War brings an urgency that governments otherwise fail to summon. For instance, the Manhattan Project took six years to produce a working atomic bomb, starting from virtually nothing, and at its peak consumed 0.4 percent of American economic output. It is hard to imagine a comparably speedy and decisive achievement these days.

    As a teenager in the 1970s, I heard talk about the desirability of rebuilding the Tappan Zee Bridge. Now, a replacement is scheduled to open no earlier than 2017, at least — provided that concerns about an endangered sturgeon can be addressed. Kennedy Airport remains dysfunctional, and La Guardia is hardly cutting edge, hobbling air transit in and out of New York. The $800 billion stimulus bill, in response to the recession, has not changed this basic situation.

    A Safer World

    The number of people who have died in wars has declined sharply since the 20th century.

    Battle-related deaths per 100,000 people*

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    0.3

    1950

    1955

    1960

    1965

    1970

    1975

    1980

    1985

    1990

    1995

    2000

    2005

    2010

    * Soldiers plus civilians caught in crossfire; does not include disease- or famine-related deaths in war

    Source: Steven Pinker, Harvard University, based on data from the Human Security Report Project at Simon Fraser University,

    Today the major slow-growing Western European nations have very little fear of being taken over militarily, and thus their politicians don’t face extreme penalties for continuing stagnation. Instead, losing office often means a boost in income from speaking or consulting fees or a comfortable retirement in a pleasant vacation spot. Japan, by comparison, is faced with territorial and geopolitical pressures from China, and in response it is attempting a national revitalization through the economic policies of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

    Ian Morris, a professor of classics and history at Stanford, has revived the hypothesis that war is a significant factor behind economic growth in his recent book, “War! What Is it Good For? Conflict and the Progress of Civilization From Primates to Robots.” Morris considers a wide variety of cases, including the Roman Empire, the European state during its Renaissance rise and the contemporary United States. In each case there is good evidence that the desire to prepare for war spurred technological invention and also brought a higher degree of internal social order.

    Another new book, Kwasi Kwarteng’s “War and Gold: A 500-Year History of Empires, Adventures, and Debt,” makes a similar argument but focuses on capital markets. Mr. Kwarteng, a Conservative member of British Parliament, argues that the need to finance wars led governments to help develop monetary and financial institutions, enabling the rise of the West. He does worry, however, that today many governments are abusing these institutions and using them to take on too much debt. (Both Mr. Kwarteng and Mr. Morris are extending themes from Azar Gat’s 820-page magnum opus, “War in Human Civilization,” published in 2006.)

    Yet another investigation of the hypothesis appears in a recent working paper by the economists Chiu Yu Ko, Mark Koyama and Tuan-Hwee Sng. The paper argues that Europe evolved as more politically fragmented than China because China’s risk of conquest from its western flank led it toward political centralization for purposes of defense. This centralization was useful at first but eventually held China back. The European countries invested more in technology and modernization, precisely because they were afraid of being taken over by their nearby rivals.

    But here is the catch: Whatever the economic benefits of potential conflict might have been, the calculus is different today. Technologies have become much more destructive, and so a large-scale war would be a bigger disaster than before. That makes many wars less likely, which is a good thing, but it also makes economic stagnation easier to countenance.

    There is a more optimistic read to all this than may first appear. Arguably the contemporary world is trading some growth in material living standards for peace — a relative paucity of war deaths and injuries, even with a kind of associated laziness.

    We can prefer higher rates of economic growth and progress, even while recognizing that recent G.D.P. figures do not adequately measure all of the gains we have been enjoying. In addition to more peace, we also have a cleaner environment (along most but not all dimensions), more leisure time and a higher degree of social tolerance for minorities and formerly persecuted groups. Our more peaceful and — yes — more slacker-oriented world is in fact better than our economic measures acknowledge.

    Living in a largely peaceful world with 2 percent G.D.P. growth has some big advantages that you don’t get with 4 percent growth and many more war deaths. Economic stasis may not feel very impressive, but it’s something our ancestors never quite managed to pull off. The real questions are whether we can do any better, and whether the recent prevalence of peace is a mere temporary bubble just waiting to be burst.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_W._Tuchman

    Barbara W. Tuchman

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Barbara W. Tuchman

    Tuchman-portrait.jpg

    Born Barbara Wertheim

    January 30, 1912

    New York City

    Died February 6, 1989 (aged 77)

    Greenwich, Connecticut

    Occupation Writer, journalist, historian

    Nationality American

    Period 1938–1988 (writer)

    Genre History

    Subject Middle Ages, Renaissance, American Revolution, 1900, World War I

    Spouse Lester R. Tuchman

    (b. 1904, d. 1997)

    Children Three daughters

    Relatives Maurice Wertheim (father)

    Henry Morgenthau Sr.

    (maternal grandfather)

    Henry Morgenthau, Jr.

    (maternal uncle)

    Robert M. Morgenthau (cousin)

    Jessica Mathews (daughter)

    Barbara Wertheim Tuchman (/ˈtʌkmən/; January 30, 1912 – February 6, 1989) was an American historian and author. She won the Pulitzer Prize twice, for The Guns of August (1962), a best-selling history of the prelude to and the first month of World War I, and Stilwell and the American Experience in China (1971), a biography of General Joseph Stilwell.[1]

    Tuchman focused on writing popular history.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Biography

    1.1 Early years

    1.2 Researcher and journalist

    1.3 Historian

    1.4 Death and legacy

    2 Tuchman’s Law

    3 Publications

    3.1 Books

    3.2 Other works

    4 Footnotes

    5 External links

    Biography[edit]

    Early years[edit]

    Barbara Wertheim Tuchman was born January 30, 1912, the daughter of the banker Maurice Wertheim and his first wife Alma Morgenthau. Her father was an individual of wealth and prestige, the owner of The Nation magazine, president of the American Jewish Congress, prominent art collector, and a founder of the Theatre Guild.[2] Her mother was the daughter of Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Woodrow Wilson’s ambassador to the Ottoman Empire.[2]

    Wertheim was influenced at an early age by the books of Lucy Fitch Perkins, G.A. Henty, and Wolfe, as well as the historical novels of Dumas.[2] She attended the Walden School on Manhattan’s Upper West Side.[3] She received her Bachelor of Arts from Radcliffe College in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1933, having studied history and literature.[2]

    Researcher and journalist[edit]

    Following graduation, Wertheim worked as a volunteer research assistant at the Institute of Pacific Relations in New York, spending a year in Tokyo in 1934-35, including a month in China, before returning to the United States via the Trans-Siberian Railway to Moscow and on to Paris.[2] She also contributed to The Nation as a correspondent until her father’s sale of the publication in 1937, traveling to Valencia and Madrid to cover the Spanish Civil War.[4] A first book resulted from her Spanish experience, The Lost British Policy: Britain and Spain Since 1700, published in 1938.

    In 1940 Wertheim married Lester R. Tuchman (taking his surname), an internist, medical researcher and professor of clinical medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Manhattan. They had three daughters, including Jessica Mathews, a former president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.[5]

    During the years of World War II, Tuchman worked in the Office of War Information.[2] Following the war, Tuchman spent the next decade working to raise the children while doing basic research for what would ultimately become the 1956 book Bible and Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour.[2]

    Historian[edit]

    With the publication of Bible and Sword in 1956, Tuchman dedicated herself to historical research and writing, turning out a new book approximately every four years.[2] Rather than feeling hampered by the lack of an advanced degree in history, Tuchman argued that freedom from the rigors and expectations of academia was actually liberating, as the norms of academic writing would have “stifled any writing capacity.”[2]

    Tuchman favored a literary approach to the writing of history, providing eloquent explanatory narratives rather than concentration upon discovery and publication of fresh archival sources. In the words of one biographer, Tuchman was “not a historian’s historian; she was a layperson’s historian who made the past interesting to millions of readers.”[6] Tuchman’s storytelling prowess was rewarded in 1963 when she received the Pulitzer Prize for her book The Guns of August, dealing with the behind-the-scenes political machinations which led to the eruption of World War I in the summer of 1914.

    Tuchman would receive a second Pulitzer in 1972 for her biography of Joseph Stilwell, Stilwell and the American Experience in China.

    In 1978, Tuchman was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[7] She won a U.S. National Book Award in History[8] for the first paperback edition of A Distant Mirror in 1980.[9]

    Also in 1980 the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) selected Tuchman for the Jefferson Lecture, the U.S. federal government’s highest honor for achievement in the humanities. Tuchman’s lecture was entitled “Mankind’s Better Moments”.[10]

    Tuchman was a trustee of Radcliffe College and a lecturer at Harvard, the University of California, and the Naval War College. Although she never received a formal graduate degree in history, Tuchman was the recipient of a number of honorary degrees from leading American universities, including Yale, Harvard, New York University, Columbia, Boston University, and Smith College, among others.[2]

    Death and legacy[edit]

    Barbara Tuchman died February 6, 1989 in Greenwich, Connecticut following a stroke.[2] She was 77 years old at the time of her death.

    Tuchman is best remembered as a two-time winner of the illustrious Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction, first for The Guns of August in 1963, and again for Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–45 in 1972.[1]

    A tower of Currier House, a residential division first of Radcliffe College and now of Harvard College was named in her honor.

    Tuchman’s Law[edit]

    In the introduction to her 1978 book A Distant Mirror, Tuchman playfully identified a historical phenomenon which she termed “Tuchman’s Law,” to wit:

    Disaster is rarely as pervasive as it seems from recorded accounts. The fact of being on the record makes it appear continuous and ubiquitous whereas it is more likely to have been sporadic both in time and place. Besides, persistence of the normal is usually greater than the effect of the disturbance, as we know from our own times. After absorbing the news of today, one expects to face a world consisting entirely of strikes, crimes, power failures, broken water mains, stalled trains, school shutdowns, muggers, drug addicts, neo-Nazis, and rapists. The fact is that one can come home in the evening — on a lucky day — without having encountered more than one or two of these phenomena. This has led me to formulate Tuchman’s Law, as follows: “The fact of being reported multiplies the apparent extent of any deplorable development by five- to tenfold” (or any figure the reader would care to supply).[11]

    Tuchman’s Law has been defined as a psychological principle of “perceptual readiness” or “subjective probability”.[12]

    Publications[edit]

    Books[edit]

    The Lost British Policy: Britain and Spain Since 1700. London: United Editorial, 1938. OCLC 1437885

    Bible and Sword: England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour. New York: New York University Press, 1956. OCLC 445506

    The Zimmerman Telegram. New York: Viking Press, 1958. OCLC 221110341

    The Guns of August. New York: Macmillan, 1962. OCLC 781625312

    The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War, 1890–1914. New York: Macmillan, 1966. ISBN 0345405013

    Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911–45 (1971) OCLC 109537

    Notes from China. New York: Collier, 1972. OCLC 570634

    A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous Fourteenth Century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978. ISBN 0394400267

    Practicing History: Selected Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981. ISBN 0394520866

    The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Knopf/Random House, 1984. ISBN 0394527771

    The First Salute: A View of the American Revolution. New York: Knopf/Random House, 1988. ISBN 0394553330

    Other works[edit]

    America’s Security in the 1980s. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1982.

    The Book: A Lecture Sponsored by the Center for the Book in the Library of Congress and the Authors’ League of America, Presented at the Library of Congress, October 17, 1979. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1980.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_van_Creveld

    Martin Levi van Creveld (Hebrew: מרטין ון קרפלד‎‎; born 5 March 1946) is an Israeli military historian and theorist.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Life and career

    2 Books

    3 Views on current affairs

    4 Published works

    5 References

    6 External links

    Life and career[edit]

    Van Creveld was born in the Netherlands in the city of Rotterdam to a Jewish family. His parents, Leon and Margaret, were staunch Zionists who had managed to evade the Nazis during World War II. One of Creveld’s uncles and several cousins were killed in the Holocaust.

    In 1950, his family emigrated to Israel, and Creveld grew up in Ramat Gan. He was drafted to the Israel Defense Forces and served in logistics, but was soon granted an early discharge for medical reasons due to his cleft palate. From 1964 to 1969, he studied history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and earned an MA. From 1969–71, he studied history at the London School of Economics and received a PhD.[1]

    Van Creveld’s doctoral dissertation on Hitler’s strategy in the Balkans during the early years of World War II was later published as a book. After completing his PhD in 1971, van Creveld returned to Israel and began teaching at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He became a professor in 1988. In 2007, he retired from teaching at Hebrew University, and began teaching at Tel Aviv University’s Security Studies Program.[2]

    Van Creveld has been married twice and has three children. He lives in Mevaseret Zion.[1]

    Books[edit]

    Van Creveld is the author of seventeen books on military history and strategy, of which Command in War (1985), Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (1977, 2nd edition 2004), The Transformation of War (1991), The Sword and the Olive (1998) and The Rise and Decline of the State (1999) are among the best known. Van Creveld has lectured or taught at many strategic institutes in the Western world, including the U.S. Naval War College.

    Of particular significance is his 1991 book The Transformation of War (UK: On Future War), which was translated into French, German (New German edition in 2004), Russian, and Spanish. In this treatise of military theory, van Creveld develops what he calls the non-trinitarian theory of warfare, which he juxtaposes to the famous work by Clausewitz, On War.[3]

    Clausewitz’s trinitarian model of war (a term of van Creveld’s) distinguishes between the affairs of the population, the army, and the government.[4] Van Creveld criticizes this philosophy as too narrow and state-focused, thus inapplicable to the study of those conflicts involving one or more non-state actors. Instead, he proposes five key issues of war:

    By whom war is fought – whether by states or by non-state actors

    What is war all about – the relationships between the actors, and between them and the non-combatants

    How war is fought – issues of strategy and tactics

    What war is fought for – whether to enhance national power, or as an end to itself

    Why war is fought – the motivations of the individual soldier.

    Van Creveld notes that many of the wars fought after 1945 were low-intensity conflicts (LICs) which powerful states ended up losing. The book argues that we are seeing a decline of the nation-state, without a comparable decline in organized violence. Moreover, in his view, armies consistently train and equip to fight a conventional war, rather than the LICs they are likely to face. Consequently, it is imperative that nation states change the training of their armed forces and rethink their weapon procurement programs.

    The book’s significance is attested to by the fact that until the middle of 2008, it was included on the list of required reading for United States Army officers, and (with Sun Tzu and Clausewitz) the third non-American entry on the list.[5] Van Creveld’s Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton is now included on the list as well.

    In a commander’s quest for certainty in battlefield information, Van Creveld popularized “directed telescope” as a term to describe the use of specially selected and trusted officers as special agents or observers for the commander”.[6][7]

    In addition to his books on military history, van Creveld has written one book on social issues – The Privileged Sex – which argues that the idea women are the oppressed gender is largely a myth, and that women, and not men, are the privileged gender.[8]

    Views on current affairs[edit]

    In addition to writing on military history, van Creveld also comments, often pointedly, on contemporary societies and politics.

    In a TV interview in 2002, he expressed doubts as to the ability of the Israeli army to defeat the Palestinians:

    They [Israeli soldiers] are very brave people… they are idealists… they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel… if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier, if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal.[9]

    In a September 2003 interview in Elsevier, a Dutch weekly, on Israel and the dangers it faces from Iran, the Palestinians and world opinion van Creveld stated:

    We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.[10]

    In the 21 August 2004 edition of the International Herald Tribune van Creveld wrote, “Had the Iranians not tried to build nuclear weapons, they would be crazy.”[11]

    In 2005, van Creveld made headlines when he said in an interview that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was “the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC [sic] sent his legions into Germany and lost them”, a reference to the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. His analysis included harsh criticism of the Bush Administration, comparing the war to the Vietnam war. Moreover, he said that “Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial.” [5]

    In 2007, van Creveld commented that

    Iran is the real victor in Iraq, and the world must now learn to live with a nuclear Iran the way we learned to live with a nuclear Soviet Union and a nuclear China…. We Israelis have what it takes to deter an Iranian attack. We are in no danger at all of having an Iranian nuclear weapon dropped on us…. thanks to the Iranian threat, we are getting weapons from the U.S. and Germany.[12]

    Van Creveld viewed the Second Lebanon War as a strategic success for Israel and a Hezbollah defeat. He was also highly critical of the Winograd Commission’s report for its failure to note the many successes brought about by Israel’s military campaign. He noted that Hezbollah “had the fight knocked out of it,” lost hundreds of its members and that the organization was “thrown out of South Lebanon,” replaced by “a fairly robust United Nations peacekeeping force.” He also noted that as a result of the war, Israel is experiencing a level of calm on its Lebanon border not seen since the mid-1960s.[13] More recently, in an article published in Infinity Journal in June 2011, titled “The Second Lebanon War: A Reassessment”, Martin van Creveld argued that contrary to the common view, and despite “clumsy, heavy-handed, and slow” ground operations, the Second Lebanon War was a great victory for Israel. He states that as a result of the war, “since the middle of August 2006, all over southern Lebanon hardly a shot has been fired.”[14]

    In an opinion piece published in The Jewish Daily Forward in 2010, van Creveld argued that the West Bank, far from being vital to Israel’s security, is a territory “that Israel can easily afford to give up.” Van Creveld contended that the West Bank offers no defense against ballistic missiles from Israel’s two chief enemies, Iran and Syria. Furthermore, provided that it would be demilitarized in any future peace settlement with the Palestinians, the West Bank would act as a natural barrier impeding the advance of any army endeavoring to invade Israel by land from the east. Lastly, Israel could defend itself against terrorism from the West Bank by means of a wall coupled with offensive campaigns the likes of Operation Cast Lead and the Second Lebanon War, which successfully restored Israel’s deterrence factor when the level of terrorism exceeded what Israel was willing to tolerate.[15] Stephen Kramer, Israel Correspondent for the Jewish Times of South Jersey, disputed the accuracy and relevance of figures cited by van Creveld in relation to Israel’s GDP and arms exports. Kramer, who lives in the Samarian settlement of Alfei Menashe, also argued that the Israeli army plays a crucial role fighting terrorism in the West Bank, whereas its absence could precipitate a Hamas “takeover” similar to the one that occurred in the wake of Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.[16] [Hamas won the democratic Palestinian election of 2006]

    In an article co-authored with Cambridge researcher of Middle Eastern history[17] Jason Pack addressing the 2011 Libyan civil war, van Creveld challenged the media’s tendency to portray the circumstances in Libya as being largely equivalent to those that formed the backdrop to the overthrow of ben-Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt earlier in the year. “The remarkable spread of the 2011 Arab revolts across the face of North Africa causes many journalists to portray the current Libyan uprising as fueled by similar factors to those at play in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt. There are more differences than similarities.” Van Creveld noted that Tunisia and Egypt “have been coherent nation-states for well over a century,” while Libyan society is still pervasively tribalist. He also observed that whereas the armies of Tunisia and Egypt could mediate the transitions between the old regimes and the new, “Libya lacks a professional, non-tribal army” that could function in such a role. Van Creveld blamed Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi for squandering a crucial opportunity to restore order to the country and confidence – both domestic and international – in the Gaddafi regime.[18]

    Van Creveld has stated that the Israeli government has “vastly exaggerated the threat that a nuclear Iran poses to its security, as well as Israel’s capacity to halt it.”[19]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    this crasy agent ask when I in kitchen with fiid from neighbour get out of flat, with bang bang humilate sound infornt any neighbour and sput in stairs so all neighbours hear.

    callssic to call police but I don’t do it.

  • chen wolf

    If it was me all neighbours support call to police from 1 neighbour they do it immdietly if it is me call them to stop. Mass of poeple against me this is NAzis behaviors.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    They ask neighbour together tell lies I dangerous and threat them and they all heasred it even from my own flat. Thiy are try to murdur, this nazis within 1 day they nazis al of them plus radiation voices form their flat and they track me within my flat.

    THis is torture facility, al neeighbours involved and police dont want to stop them.

    They are torture neighbours notouch torture 247 365 this is Zionazis with Zionaz in mossad

  • chen wolf

    Here the address of this cromes aaginst humanity 2 years :

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler

    Adolf Hitler (German: [ˈadɔlf ˈhɪtlɐ] ( listen); 20 April 1889 – 30 April 1945) was a German politician who was the leader of the Nazi Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; NSDAP), Chancellor of Germany from 1933 to 1945, and Führer (“leader”) of Nazi Germany from 1934 to 1945. As dictator of Nazi Germany, he initiated World War II in Europe with the invasion of Poland in September 1939 and was a central figure of the Holocaust.

    Born into a German-speaking Austrian family and raised near Linz, Hitler moved to Germany in 1913 and was decorated during his service in the German Army in World War I. He joined the precursor of the NSDAP, the German Workers’ Party, in 1919 and became leader of the NSDAP in 1921. In 1923, he attempted a coup in Munich to seize power. The failed coup resulted in Hitler’s imprisonment, during which time he dictated the first volume of his autobiography and political manifesto Mein Kampf (“My Struggle”). After his release in 1924, Hitler gained popular support by attacking the Treaty of Versailles and promoting Pan-Germanism, anti-Semitism, and anti-communism with charismatic oratory and Nazi propaganda. Hitler frequently denounced international capitalism and communism as being part of a Jewish conspiracy.

    By 1933, the Nazi Party was the largest elected party in the German Reichstag, which led to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor on 30 January 1933. Following fresh elections won by his coalition, the Reichstag passed the Enabling Act, which began the process of transforming the Weimar Republic into Nazi Germany, a one-party dictatorship based on the totalitarian and autocratic ideology of National Socialism. Hitler aimed to eliminate Jews from Germany and establish a New Order to counter what he saw as the injustice of the post-World War I international order dominated by Britain and France. His first six years in power resulted in rapid economic recovery from the Great Depression, the effective abandonment of restrictions imposed on Germany after World War I, and the annexation of territories that were home to millions of ethnic Germans—actions which gave him significant popular support.

    Hitler sought Lebensraum (“living space”) for the German people. His aggressive foreign policy is considered to be the primary cause of the outbreak of World War II in Europe. He directed large-scale rearmament and on 1 September 1939 invaded Poland, resulting in British and French declarations of war on Germany. In June 1941, Hitler ordered an invasion of the Soviet Union. By the end of 1941 German forces and the European Axis powers occupied most of Europe and North Africa. Failure to defeat the Soviets and the entry of the United States into the war forced Germany onto the defensive and it suffered a series of escalating defeats. In the final days of the war, during the Battle of Berlin in 1945, Hitler married his long-time lover, Eva Braun. On 30 April 1945, less than two days later, the two killed themselves to avoid capture by the Red Army, and their corpses were burned.

    Under Hitler’s leadership and racially motivated ideology, the Nazi regime was responsible for the genocide of at least 5.5 million Jews and millions of other victims whom he and his followers deemed Untermenschen (“sub-humans”) and socially undesirable. Hitler and the Nazi regime were also responsible for the killing of an estimated 19.3 million civilians and prisoners of war. In addition, 29 million soldiers and civilians died as a result of military action in the European Theatre of World War II. The number of civilians killed during the Second World War was unprecedented in warfare, and constitutes the deadliest conflict in human history.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    Martin van Creveld

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Martin van Creveld

    Martin van Creveld crop.jpg

    at the House of Commons, London

    (26 February 2008)

    Born 5 March 1946 (age 70)

    Rotterdam, Netherlands

    Nationality Israeli

    Fields Military history

    Military theory

    Alma mater London School of Economics

    Hebrew University of Jerusalem

    Website

    martin-van-creveld.com

    Martin Levi van Creveld (Hebrew: מרטין ון קרפלד‎‎; born 5 March 1946) is an Israeli military historian and theorist.

    Contents [hide]

    1 Life and career

    2 Books

    3 Views on current affairs

    4 Published works

    5 References

    6 External links

    Life and career[edit]

    Van Creveld was born in the Netherlands in the city of Rotterdam to a Jewish family. His parents, Leon and Margaret, were staunch Zionists who had managed to evade the Nazis during World War II. One of Creveld’s uncles and several cousins were killed in the Holocaust.

    In 1950, his family emigrated to Israel, and Creveld grew up in Ramat Gan. He was drafted to the Israel Defense Forces and served in logistics, but was soon granted an early discharge for medical reasons due to his cleft palate. From 1964 to 1969, he studied history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and earned an MA. From 1969–71, he studied history at the London School of Economics and received a PhD.[1]

    Van Creveld’s doctoral dissertation on Hitler’s strategy in the Balkans during the early years of World War II was later published as a book. After completing his PhD in 1971, van Creveld returned to Israel and began teaching at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He became a professor in 1988. In 2007, he retired from teaching at Hebrew University, and began teaching at Tel Aviv University’s Security Studies Program.[2]

    Van Creveld has been married twice and has three children. He lives in Mevaseret Zion.[1]

    Books[edit]

    Van Creveld is the author of seventeen books on military history and strategy, of which Command in War (1985), Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton (1977, 2nd edition 2004), The Transformation of War (1991), The Sword and the Olive (1998) and The Rise and Decline of the State (1999) are among the best known. Van Creveld has lectured or taught at many strategic institutes in the Western world, including the U.S. Naval War College.

    Of particular significance is his 1991 book The Transformation of War (UK: On Future War), which was translated into French, German (New German edition in 2004), Russian, and Spanish. In this treatise of military theory, van Creveld develops what he calls the non-trinitarian theory of warfare, which he juxtaposes to the famous work by Clausewitz, On War.[3]

    Clausewitz’s trinitarian model of war (a term of van Creveld’s) distinguishes between the affairs of the population, the army, and the government.[4] Van Creveld criticizes this philosophy as too narrow and state-focused, thus inapplicable to the study of those conflicts involving one or more non-state actors. Instead, he proposes five key issues of war:

    By whom war is fought – whether by states or by non-state actors

    What is war all about – the relationships between the actors, and between them and the non-combatants

    How war is fought – issues of strategy and tactics

    What war is fought for – whether to enhance national power, or as an end to itself

    Why war is fought – the motivations of the individual soldier.

    Van Creveld notes that many of the wars fought after 1945 were low-intensity conflicts (LICs) which powerful states ended up losing. The book argues that we are seeing a decline of the nation-state, without a comparable decline in organized violence. Moreover, in his view, armies consistently train and equip to fight a conventional war, rather than the LICs they are likely to face. Consequently, it is imperative that nation states change the training of their armed forces and rethink their weapon procurement programs.

    The book’s significance is attested to by the fact that until the middle of 2008, it was included on the list of required reading for United States Army officers, and (with Sun Tzu and Clausewitz) the third non-American entry on the list.[5] Van Creveld’s Supplying War: Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton is now included on the list as well.

    In a commander’s quest for certainty in battlefield information, Van Creveld popularized “directed telescope” as a term to describe the use of specially selected and trusted officers as special agents or observers for the commander”.[6][7]

    In addition to his books on military history, van Creveld has written one book on social issues – The Privileged Sex – which argues that the idea women are the oppressed gender is largely a myth, and that women, and not men, are the privileged gender.[8]

    Views on current affairs[edit]

    In addition to writing on military history, van Creveld also comments, often pointedly, on contemporary societies and politics.

    In a TV interview in 2002, he expressed doubts as to the ability of the Israeli army to defeat the Palestinians:

    They [Israeli soldiers] are very brave people… they are idealists… they want to serve their country and they want to prove themselves. The problem is that you cannot prove yourself against someone who is much weaker than yourself. They are in a lose-lose situation. If you are strong and fighting the weak, then if you kill your opponent then you are a scoundrel… if you let him kill you, then you are an idiot. So here is a dilemma which others have suffered before us, and for which as far as I can see there is simply no escape. Now the Israeli army has not by any means been the worst of the lot. It has not done what for instance the Americans did in Vietnam… it did not use napalm, it did not kill millions of people. So everything is relative, but by definition, to return to what I said earlier, if you are strong and you are fighting the weak, then anything you do is criminal.[9]

    In a September 2003 interview in Elsevier, a Dutch weekly, on Israel and the dangers it faces from Iran, the Palestinians and world opinion van Creveld stated:

    We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force…. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.[10]

    In the 21 August 2004 edition of the International Herald Tribune van Creveld wrote, “Had the Iranians not tried to build nuclear weapons, they would be crazy.”[11]

    In 2005, van Creveld made headlines when he said in an interview that the 2003 invasion of Iraq was “the most foolish war since Emperor Augustus in 9 BC [sic] sent his legions into Germany and lost them”, a reference to the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest. His analysis included harsh criticism of the Bush Administration, comparing the war to the Vietnam war. Moreover, he said that “Bush deserves to be impeached and, once he has been removed from office, put on trial.” [5]

    In 2007, van Creveld commented that

    Iran is the real victor in Iraq, and the world must now learn to live with a nuclear Iran the way we learned to live with a nuclear Soviet Union and a nuclear China…. We Israelis have what it takes to deter an Iranian attack. We are in no danger at all of having an Iranian nuclear weapon dropped on us…. thanks to the Iranian threat, we are getting weapons from the U.S. and Germany.[12]

    Van Creveld viewed the Second Lebanon War as a strategic success for Israel and a Hezbollah defeat. He was also highly critical of the Winograd Commission’s report for its failure to note the many successes brought about by Israel’s military campaign. He noted that Hezbollah “had the fight knocked out of it,” lost hundreds of its members and that the organization was “thrown out of South Lebanon,” replaced by “a fairly robust United Nations peacekeeping force.” He also noted that as a result of the war, Israel is experiencing a level of calm on its Lebanon border not seen since the mid-1960s.[13] More recently, in an article published in Infinity Journal in June 2011, titled “The Second Lebanon War: A Reassessment”, Martin van Creveld argued that contrary to the common view, and despite “clumsy, heavy-handed, and slow” ground operations, the Second Lebanon War was a great victory for Israel. He states that as a result of the war, “since the middle of August 2006, all over southern Lebanon hardly a shot has been fired.”[14]

    In an opinion piece published in The Jewish Daily Forward in 2010, van Creveld argued that the West Bank, far from being vital to Israel’s security, is a territory “that Israel can easily afford to give up.” Van Creveld contended that the West Bank offers no defense against ballistic missiles from Israel’s two chief enemies, Iran and Syria. Furthermore, provided that it would be demilitarized in any future peace settlement with the Palestinians, the West Bank would act as a natural barrier impeding the advance of any army endeavoring to invade Israel by land from the east. Lastly, Israel could defend itself against terrorism from the West Bank by means of a wall coupled with offensive campaigns the likes of Operation Cast Lead and the Second Lebanon War, which successfully restored Israel’s deterrence factor when the level of terrorism exceeded what Israel was willing to tolerate.[15] Stephen Kramer, Israel Correspondent for the Jewish Times of South Jersey, disputed the accuracy and relevance of figures cited by van Creveld in relation to Israel’s GDP and arms exports. Kramer, who lives in the Samarian settlement of Alfei Menashe, also argued that the Israeli army plays a crucial role fighting terrorism in the West Bank, whereas its absence could precipitate a Hamas “takeover” similar to the one that occurred in the wake of Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.[16] [Hamas won the democratic Palestinian election of 2006]

    In an article co-authored with Cambridge researcher of Middle Eastern history[17] Jason Pack addressing the 2011 Libyan civil war, van Creveld challenged the media’s tendency to portray the circumstances in Libya as being largely equivalent to those that formed the backdrop to the overthrow of ben-Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt earlier in the year. “The remarkable spread of the 2011 Arab revolts across the face of North Africa causes many journalists to portray the current Libyan uprising as fueled by similar factors to those at play in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt. There are more differences than similarities.” Van Creveld noted that Tunisia and Egypt “have been coherent nation-states for well over a century,” while Libyan society is still pervasively tribalist. He also observed that whereas the armies of Tunisia and Egypt could mediate the transitions between the old regimes and the new, “Libya lacks a professional, non-tribal army” that could function in such a role. Van Creveld blamed Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam Gaddafi for squandering a crucial opportunity to restore order to the country and confidence – both domestic and international – in the Gaddafi regime.[18]

    Van Creveld has stated that the Israeli government has “vastly exaggerated the threat that a nuclear Iran poses to its security, as well as Israel’s capacity to halt it.”[19]

    Published works[edit]

  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf

    http://mindjustice.org/ginter-transcript.htm

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

  • chen wolf

    National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state as well as other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism developed out of the influences of Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after German defeat in World War I.

    Nazism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of what Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.[2] Bruce David Baum. The Rise and Fall of the Caucasian Race: A Political History of Racial Identity. New York, New York, USA; London, England, UK: New York University Press, 2006. P. 156. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, or “people’s community” based on national unity. The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum, while excluding those deemed either to be community aliens or foreign peoples. The term “National Socialism” arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of “socialism”, as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privately owned businesses of Aryans.

    The Nazi Party was founded as the Pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers’ Party on 5 January 1919. By the early 1920s, Adolf Hitler assumed control of the organization and renamed it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP) to broaden its appeal. The National Socialist Program, adopted in 1920, called for a united Greater Germany that would deny citizenship to Jews or those of Jewish descent, while also supporting land reform and the nationalization of some industries. In Mein Kampf, written in 1924, Hitler outlined the antisemitism and anti-communism at the heart of his political philosophy, as well as his disdain for parliamentary democracy and his belief in Germany’s right to territorial expansion.

    In 1933, with the support of traditional conservative nationalists, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and the Nazis gradually established a one-party state, under which Jews, political opponents and other “undesirable” elements were marginalized, with several millions eventually imprisoned and killed. Hitler purged the party’s more socially and economically radical factions in the mid-1934 Night of the Long Knives and, after the death of President Hindenburg, political power was concentrated in his hands, as Führer or “leader”. Following the Holocaust and German defeat in World War II, only a few fringe racist groups, usually referred to as neo-Nazis, still describe themselves as following National Socialism.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

    National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state as well as other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism developed out of the influences of Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after German defeat in World War I.

    Nazism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of what Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.[2] Bruce David Baum. The Rise and Fall of the Caucasian Race: A Political History of Racial Identity. New York, New York, USA; London, England, UK: New York University Press, 2006. P. 156. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, or “people’s community” based on national unity. The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum, while excluding those deemed either to be community aliens or foreign peoples. The term “National Socialism” arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of “socialism”, as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privately owned businesses of Aryans.

    The Nazi Party was founded as the Pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers’ Party on 5 January 1919. By the early 1920s, Adolf Hitler assumed control of the organization and renamed it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP) to broaden its appeal. The National Socialist Program, adopted in 1920, called for a united Greater Germany that would deny citizenship to Jews or those of Jewish descent, while also supporting land reform and the nationalization of some industries. In Mein Kampf, written in 1924, Hitler outlined the antisemitism and anti-communism at the heart of his political philosophy, as well as his disdain for parliamentary democracy and his belief in Germany’s right to territorial expansion.

    In 1933, with the support of traditional conservative nationalists, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and the Nazis gradually established a one-party state, under which Jews, political opponents and other “undesirable” elements were marginalized, with several millions eventually imprisoned and killed. Hitler purged the party’s more socially and economically radical factions in the mid-1934 Night of the Long Knives and, after the death of President Hindenburg, political power was concentrated in his hands, as Führer or “leader”. Following the Holocaust and German defeat in World War II, only a few fringe racist groups, usually referred to as neo-Nazis, still describe themselves as following National Socialism.

    Nazis alongside members of the far-right reactionary and monarchist German National People’s Party (DNVP), during the brief Nazi-DNVP alliance in the Harzburg Front from 1931 to 1932

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

    National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnɑːtsɪzəm, ˈnæ-/[1]), is the ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state as well as other far-right groups. Usually characterized as a form of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and antisemitism, Nazism developed out of the influences of Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary groups that emerged during the Weimar Republic after German defeat in World War I.

    Nazism subscribed to theories of racial hierarchy and Social Darwinism, identifying Germans as part of what Nazis regarded as an Aryan or Nordic master race.[2] Bruce David Baum. The Rise and Fall of the Caucasian Race: A Political History of Racial Identity. New York, New York, USA; London, England, UK: New York University Press, 2006. P. 156. It aimed to overcome social divisions and create a homogeneous society, or “people’s community” based on national unity. The Nazis aimed to unite all Germans living in historically German territory, as well as gain additional lands for German expansion under the doctrine of Lebensraum, while excluding those deemed either to be community aliens or foreign peoples. The term “National Socialism” arose out of attempts to create a nationalist redefinition of “socialism”, as an alternative to both internationalist Marxist socialism and free market capitalism. Nazism rejected the Marxist concept of class struggle, opposed cosmopolitan internationalism, and sought to defend the private property and privately owned businesses of Aryans.

    The Nazi Party was founded as the Pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers’ Party on 5 January 1919. By the early 1920s, Adolf Hitler assumed control of the organization and renamed it the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, NSDAP) to broaden its appeal. The National Socialist Program, adopted in 1920, called for a united Greater Germany that would deny citizenship to Jews or those of Jewish descent, while also supporting land reform and the nationalization of some industries. In Mein Kampf, written in 1924, Hitler outlined the antisemitism and anti-communism at the heart of his political philosophy, as well as his disdain for parliamentary democracy and his belief in Germany’s right to territorial expansion.

    In 1933, with the support of traditional conservative nationalists, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany and the Nazis gradually established a one-party state, under which Jews, political opponents and other “undesirable” elements were marginalized, with several millions eventually imprisoned and killed. Hitler purged the party’s more socially and economically radical factions in the mid-1934 Night of the Long Knives and, after the death of President Hindenburg, political power was concentrated in his hands, as Führer or “leader”. Following the Holocaust and German defeat in World War II, only a few fringe racist groups, usually referred to as neo-Nazis, still describe themselves as following National Socialism.

    Foreground, left to right: Führer Adolf Hitler; Hermann Göring; Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels; Rudolf Hess

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation

    Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics, such as the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been performed by countries including Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, North Korea, the United States, and the Soviet Union. Examples include Project MKUltra, Unit 731, and the experiments of Josef Mengele.

    The Declaration of Helsinki, developed by the World Medical Association (WMA), is widely regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics.[1][2][3]

    Jewish twins were kept alive to be used in Josef Mengele’s medical experiments. These children from Auschwitz were liberated by the Red Army in January 1945.

  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)

    The Eastern Front of World War II was a theatre of conflict between the European Axis powers and co-belligerent Finland against the Soviet Union, Poland and other Allies, which encompassed Northern, Southern and Central and Eastern Europe from 22 June 1941 to 9 May 1945. It has been known as the Great Patriotic War (Russian: Великая Отечественная Война, Velikaya Otechestvennaya Voyna) in the former Soviet Union and in modern Russia, while in Germany it was called the Eastern Front (German: die Ostfront),[3] the Eastern Campaign (der Ostfeldzug) or the Russian Campaign (der Rußlandfeldzug).[4][5]

    The battles on the Eastern Front constituted the largest military confrontation in history.[6] They were characterized by unprecedented ferocity, wholesale destruction, mass deportations, and immense loss of life due to combat, starvation, exposure, disease, and massacres. The Eastern Front, as the site of nearly all extermination camps, death marches, ghettos, and the majority of pogroms, was central to the Holocaust. Of the estimated 70 million deaths attributed to World War II, over 30 million,[7] many of them civilian, occurred on the Eastern Front. The Eastern Front was decisive in determining the outcome of the European portion of World War II, eventually serving as the main reason for Germany’s defeat.[8][9][10] It resulted in the destruction of the Third Reich, the partition of Germany for nearly half a century and the rise of the Soviet Union as a military and industrial superpower.

    The two principal belligerent powers were Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, along with their respective allies. Though never engaged in military action in the Eastern Front, the United Kingdom and the United States both provided substantial material aid in the form of the Lend-Lease to the Soviet Union. The joint German–Finnish operations across the northernmost Finnish–Soviet border and in the Murmansk region are considered part of the Eastern Front. In addition, the Soviet–Finnish Continuation War may also be considered the northern flank of the Eastern Front.

    A collage created by me using following images found in the Wikimedia Commons: (From top left, clockwise) File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R85077, Sowjetisches Schlachtflugzeug über Berlin.jpg (cc-by-sa-3.0 Germany) File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-J14813, Bei Orel, Panzer VI (Tiger_I).jpg (cc-by-sa-3.0 Germany) File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-646-5188-17, Flugzeuge Junkers Ju 87.jpg (cc-by-sa-3.0 Germany) File:Kiev Jew Killings in Ivangorod (1942).jpg (cropped) (public domain) File:Wilhelm Keitel Kapitulation.jpg (public domain) File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R76619, Russland, Kesselschlacht Stalingrad.jpg (cc-by-sa-3.0 Germany)

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    ZIONAZIS

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    ZIONAZIS

  • chen wolf

    ISRANAZI

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    ZIONAZISM

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    ISRAEL NAZI

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

  • chen wolf

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    Tuesday, December 2, 2014

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

  • chen wolf

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE radiation RADIATION WEAPON

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

  • chen wolf

    Silent Holocaust radiation weapons, using weapons GENOCIDE

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.c

    GENOCIDE Silent Holocaust

  • chen wolf

    GENOCIDE Silent Holocaust

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    John Ginter Interview

    Transcript

    Mind Justice Home Page | Return to John Ginter’s Story

    Interviewee: John Ginter

    Interviewer: Cheryl Welsh

    Date: September 30, 1994

    Place: Sacramento, California

    Transcriber: Teresa Bergen

    Copyright Mindjustice.org

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

    And so I filed a petition in the federal court. I went through the state court on a habeas corpus. And I constantly wrote to the judge explaining this technology and what was going on. And when my mother come up to visit me, I told her to go to the FBI office and get an FBI agent out there as fast as possible.

    Well I finally got interviewed by an FBI agent for about an hour. And he went to interview Dr. Schmidt, who was the head psychiatrist, the head prison psychiatrist, of San Quentin. Well Dr. Schmidt come over to interview me, and told me the name of this device was called M.I.N.D. He classified me after I went before a big panel, a large panel of about 18 different doctors, that I was a paranoid schizophrenic. But he give me the knowledge that this thing was called M.I.N.D. Magnetic Integrated Neuron Duplicator. And he also told me that General Erwin Walker had made the same claim while he was in Springfield under a court order.

  • chen wolf

    John Ginter Interview

    Transcript

    Mind Justice Home Page | Return to John Ginter’s Story

    Interviewee: John Ginter

    Interviewer: Cheryl Welsh

    Date: September 30, 1994

    Place: Sacramento, California

    Transcriber: Teresa Bergen

    Copyright Mindjustice.org

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

    And so I filed a petition in the federal court. I went through the state court on a habeas corpus. And I constantly wrote to the judge explaining this technology and what was going on. And when my mother come up to visit me, I told her to go to the FBI office and get an FBI agent out there as fast as possible.

  • chen wolf

    John Ginter Interview

    Transcript

    Mind Justice Home Page | Return to John Ginter’s Story

    Interviewee: John Ginter

    Interviewer: Cheryl Welsh

    Date: September 30, 1994

    Place: Sacramento, California

    Transcriber: Teresa Bergen

    Copyright Mindjustice.org

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

    And so I filed a petition in the federal court. I went through the state court on a habeas corpus. And I constantly wrote to the judge explaining this technology and what was going on. And when my mother come up to visit me, I told her to go to the FBI office and get an FBI agent out there as fast as possible.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    http://terrorkrrina.blogspot.co.il/

    Flag of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (alternative national flag of Germany, 1933-45)

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    John Ginter Interview

    Transcript

    Mind Justice Home Page | Return to John Ginter’s Story

    Interviewee: John Ginter

    Interviewer: Cheryl Welsh

    Date: September 30, 1994

    Place: Sacramento, California

    Transcriber: Teresa Bergen

    Copyright Mindjustice.org

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

    And so I filed a petition in the federal court. I went through the state court on a habeas corpus. And I constantly wrote to the judge explaining this technology and what was going on. And when my mother come up to visit me, I told her to go to the FBI office and get an FBI agent out there as fast as possible.

    Well I finally got interviewed by an FBI agent for about an hour. And he went to interview Dr. Schmidt, who was the head psychiatrist, the head prison psychiatrist, of San Quentin. Well Dr. Schmidt come over to interview me, and told me the name of this device was called M.I.N.D. He classified me after I went before a big panel, a large panel of about 18 different doctors, that I was a paranoid schizophrenic. But he give me the knowledge that this thing was called M.I.N.D. Magnetic Integrated Neuron Duplicator. And he also told me that General Erwin Walker had made the same claim while he was in Springfield under a court order.

  • chen wolf

    John Ginter Interview

    Transcript

    Mind Justice Home Page | Return to John Ginter’s Story

    Interviewee: John Ginter

    Interviewer: Cheryl Welsh

    Date: September 30, 1994

    Place: Sacramento, California

    Transcriber: Teresa Bergen

    Copyright Mindjustice.org

    JOHN GINTER: My name is John Ginter, G-i-n-t-e-r. I was a prisoner in San Quentin in 1967. And after a riot we had there in the first part of 1967, they put me in the Adjustment Center. Well two or three days later, I found myself hearing voices and not being able to figure out what was going on, so I thought that somehow there was something going on behind my cell. So I broke down the stool in the cell and knocked down the back frame of the door in the back of the cell, trying to figure out what was going on.

    Well they kept simulating an environment by sound projections. That means I could hear in my frame voices that were trying to make me believe that things were going on around me that actually weren’t going on at all. But they were doing that to, they were trying to instill fear in me, I presume, to either make me commit suicide or try to disorganize my mind. But then I kept figuring out every scenario that they had, changed to a degree, that I can’t think of now what was going on.

    And eventually, after about two or three months of this crazy shit, excuse me for saying “shit.” (laughs) Anyway, I figured out that the transmission of energy that was in my brain and the voices I heard were coming from an external force which I believe was in a James Parks, who was the associate warden, that lived up over the hill of the Adjustment Center. So I come to formulate in my mind that the only way they could be doing this to my mind was as if they used a beam of electromagnetic energy that was directed at my aura, or my brainwave.

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Weimar Republic (German: Weimarer Republik [ˈvaɪmaʁɐ ʁepuˈbliːk] ( listen)) is an unofficial designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was the German Reich (Deutsches Reich), continuing the name from the pre-1918 German Empire.

    The republic was a semi-presidential representative democracy, which emerged in the aftermath of the German Revolution of 1918–19. A national assembly was convened in Weimar, where a new constitution for the German Reich was written, and adopted on 11 August 1919. In its fourteen years, the Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, including hyperinflation, political extremism (with paramilitaries – both left and right wing) and contentious relationships with the victors of the First World War. The people of Germany blamed the Weimar Republic rather than their wartime leaders for the country’s defeat and for the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, the Weimar Republic government successfully reformed the currency, unified tax policies, and organized the railway system. Weimar Germany eliminated most of the requirements of the Treaty of Versailles; it never completely met its disarmament requirements, and eventually paid only a small portion of the war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan).[4] Under the Locarno Treaties, Germany accepted the western borders of the republic, but continued to dispute the Eastern border.

    From 1930 onwards President Hindenburg used emergency powers to back Chancellors Heinrich Brüning, Franz von Papen and General Kurt von Schleicher. The Great Depression, worsened by Brüning’s policy of deflation, led to a surge in unemployment.[5] In 1933 Adolf Hitler became the new Chancellor of a coalition government, and Nazis held two out of the remaining ten cabinet seats. Von Papen as Vice Chancellor was intended to be the “éminence grise” who would keep Hitler under control, using his close personal connection to Hindenburg. Within months, however, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act of 1933 had brought about a state of emergency and wiped out constitutional civil liberties. Hitler’s seizure of power (Machtergreifung) allowed him to govern by decree without the involvement of the legislature. These events brought the Weimar Republic to an end, as democracy collapsed and a single-party state was created. The end of the Weimar Republic marked the beginning of Nazi Germany.

    Even so, German Foreign Office official Harry Graf Kessler had predicted as early as February 1919 that the Republic was doomed. “The paradox”, he wrote, “by which a Social Democratic Government allows itself and the capitalist cash-boxes to be defended by royalist officers and unemployed on the dole is altogether too crazy.”[6]

    German Reich

    Deutsches Reich

    1918–1933 →

    Flag Coat of arms

    Anthem

    Das Lied der Deutschen

    “Song of the Germans”

    Germany in 1930

    German states during the Weimar Republic period

    Capital Berlin

    Languages German

    Religion Protestant (Lutheran, Reformed, Prussian United) majority;

    significant Roman Catholic and Jewish minorities

    Government 1919–30 Semi-presidential

    representative federal republic

    1930–33 De facto authoritarian

    rule by decree

    President

    • 1919–25 Friedrich Ebert

    • 1925–33 Paul von Hindenburg

    Chancellor

    • 1919 (first) Philipp Scheidemann

    • 1933 (last) Adolf Hitler

    Legislature Reichstag

    • State Council Reichsrat

    Historical era Interwar period

    • Established 9 November 1918

    • Government by decree begins 29 March 1930[1]

    • Hitler appointed Chancellor 30 January 1933

    • Reichstag fire 27 February 1933

    • Enabling Act 23 March 1933

    Area

    • 1925[2] 468,787 km² (181,000 sq mi)

    Population

    • 1925[2] est. 62,411,000

    Density 133.1 /km² (344.8 /sq mi)

    Currency

    1919–23 “Papiermark” (ℳ)

    1923–24 Rentenmark

    1924–33 Reichsmark (ℛℳ)

    Today part of

    Germany

    Poland

    Russia

    Belgium

    Netherlands

    The coat of arms shown above is the version used after 1928, which replaced that shown in the “Flag and coat of arms” section.[3]

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weimar_Republic

    Weimar Republic (German: Weimarer Republik [ˈvaɪmaʁɐ ʁepuˈbliːk] ( listen)) is an unofficial designation for the German state between 1919 and 1933. The name derives from the city of Weimar, where its constitutional assembly first took place. The official name of the state was the German Reich (Deutsches Reich), continuing the name from the pre-1918 German Empire.

    The republic was a semi-presidential representative democracy, which emerged in the aftermath of the German Revolution of 1918–19. A national assembly was convened in Weimar, where a new constitution for the German Reich was written, and adopted on 11 August 1919. In its fourteen years, the Weimar Republic faced numerous problems, including hyperinflation, political extremism (with paramilitaries – both left and right wing) and contentious relationships with the victors of the First World War. The people of Germany blamed the Weimar Republic rather than their wartime leaders for the country’s defeat and for the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles. However, the Weimar Republic government successfully reformed the currency, unified tax policies, and organized the railway system. Weimar Germany eliminated most of the requirements of the Treaty of Versailles; it never completely met its disarmament requirements, and eventually paid only a small portion of the war reparations (by twice restructuring its debt through the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan).[4] Under the Locarno Treaties, Germany accepted the western borders of the republic, but continued to dispute the Eastern border.

    From 1930 onwards President Hindenburg used emergency powers to back Chancellors Heinrich Brüning, Franz von Papen and General Kurt von Schleicher. The Great Depression, worsened by Brüning’s policy of deflation, led to a surge in unemployment.[5] In 1933 Adolf Hitler became the new Chancellor of a coalition government, and Nazis held two out of the remaining ten cabinet seats. Von Papen as Vice Chancellor was intended to be the “éminence grise” who would keep Hitler under control, using his close personal connection to Hindenburg. Within months, however, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act of 1933 had brought about a state of emergency and wiped out constitutional civil liberties. Hitler’s seizure of power (Machtergreifung) allowed him to govern by decree without the involvement of the legislature. These events brought the Weimar Republic to an end, as democracy collapsed and a single-party state was created. The end of the Weimar Republic marked the beginning of Nazi Germany.

    Even so, German Foreign Office official Harry Graf Kessler had predicted as early as February 1919 that the Republic was doomed. “The paradox”, he wrote, “by which a Social Democratic Government allows itself and the capitalist cash-boxes to be defended by royalist officers and unemployed on the dole is altogether too crazy.”[6]

    Flag

  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf
  • chen wolf