Overwhelming irrefutable video and documentary evidence: Sandy Hook another false flag CRIMINAL hoax requiring arrests

As I wrote in 2014 (and here), Wolfgang Halbig has the perfect combination of expertise to evaluate what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School:

▪ law enforcement: Florida State Trooper, US Customs Agent.

▪ education: teacher, assistant principal, principal.

▪ current school safety expert: trained key personnel at over 4,000 US school districts, and over 3,500 school safety officers.

His conclusion after almost three years of motivated investigation:

“In my professional opinion, [Sandy Hook was] a scripted event… in planning for maybe two, two and a half years.”

Mr. Halbig’s response is demand for criminal arrests of “leaders” involved in Sandy Hook based on rational embrace of the public evidence. Among ~30 areas of game-changing objective facts:

  • The Lanza home’s alleged police photographs were staged because the same rooms were photographed in up to four different arrangements of furniture and items (pgs. 117 to 138). These differences are major and obvious, as the photos show. This evidence means that this is NOT a crime scene, but a criminal hoax. It is not possible to have different and obvious versions of what the rooms look like.
  • The Social Security Death Index and FBI show zero deaths of alleged victims (pgs. 161 to 167). This means that these alleged people either did not have Social Security numbers or did not exist; the FBI report confirms that they did not exist. This also demands criminal investigation.
  • The one and only released death certificate of an alleged victim, Noah Pozner, is a crude forgery (pgs. 181 to 183). This is yet another crime, of course.
  • All of the 20 alleged victims’ families moved to Newtown between 2007 and 2011, and almost all from 2009 to 2011 (pgs. 239 to 244), with 14 receiving their ~$500,000 homes for a recorded sales price of $0. (ten on Christmas Day, 2009), according to official government records. This means someone paid a likely illegally-large gift to these families, which given all other evidence demands criminal investigation.
  • A manual for Sandy Hook being a FEMA exercise was delivered to researchers (pgs. 219 to 238). This should be investigated whether it’s authentic, of course, by sworn depositions.
  • The fire station up the street as the alleged destination of children shows random people walking in circles through the fire house: out one door, walking around the building, then circling through again. The people are not interacting, but acting as if in a drill to mimic activity. 3-minute video:

Why the false flags?

As I previously wrote, put yourself in the shoes of the evil .01% for a few moments. How you roll is with Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes:

Got the picture of how the .01% roll?

Ok, now embrace the present that corporate media no longer can “cover” your crimes:

  • According to a 2007 poll by the Pew Research Center, the majority of the American public see the US major media news organizations as politically biased, inaccurate, and uncaring. Among those who use the Internet, two-thirds report that major media news do not care about the people they report on, 59% say the news is inaccurate, 64% see bias, and 53% summarize their view on major media news as, “failing to stand up for America.”
  • In their 2009 poll, “just 29% of Americans say that news organizations generally get the facts straight, while 63% say that news stories are often inaccurate.”
  • Gallup’s 2014 poll recorded the lowest ever US public confidence in accurate news reporting from corporate media’s television news: 18%.
  • A June 2010 Rasmussen poll found 66% of voters “angry” at the media, with 33% “very angry.” Rasmussen also found 70% “angry” at current federal government policies.
  • The most current Gallup poll in 2012 shows Americans’ distrust at an all-time high in the reporting from “mass media — such as newspapers, TV, and radio”: 60% have either “not very much” trust and confidence or “none at all” to “reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly.”

Got that picture, along with how you .01%-ers roll?

So you ask your advisors what to do. You receive something like this:

“Your masterships: the downfall of corporate media and uprise of independent media reporting comprehensive facts means that your Emperor’s New Clothes deception is certain to end. Trending media data that your propaganda is being replaced with truth makes this outcome absolutely certain. What is not certain, my lords, is when the tipping-point will occur; but when it does, your reign of lovely evil will end as quickly as anything else slamming to the ground when tipped-over. In respectful summary, my masters, you are fucked. The only way to avoid your demise is to win a rapid endgame of multiple false flag terror attacks to implement the martial law you’ve always dreamed of to rightly control your sheeple. This opening might win enough support among the ignorant to demonize “truthers” (no offense to your demonic magnificence with that term, my lords), throw their asses into FEMA camps, and end their lives at your sadistic pleasure. Hail Hydra. Hail Satan.”

You go with the advice and accelerate false flag attacks. They seem to have particular interest in gun confiscation (here, here). As I wrote, our .01% “leaders” will work to fire people like Professor Jim Tracy who raise the points in this article. Jim is one of six Ph.Ds who created the outstanding free book I cite, Nobody died at Sandy Hook.

What is a solution?

I continue to assert a proven, obvious, and legal method:

▪ Arrests of .01% “leaders” for obvious crimes centering in war, money and lies (4-part series on arrests with videos).

▪ Leveraging a reclaimed media, continue arrests with generous plea bargains and Truth & Reconciliation for testimony, documentary evidence, and physical evidence to best put the “Big Picture” together in preparation to build the brighter future for all Earth’s inhabitants’ success.

▪ SOLUTIONS: the .01% with corporate media have suppressed solutions documented beginning with Benjamin Franklin how government can abundantly operate without taxes: monetary and credit reform allow the public to have near-instant prosperity: full-employment, zero public deficits and debt, the best infrastructure we can imagine, falling prices, and release of public TRILLIONS held in “rainy day” accounts. Full documentation here.

Excellent comprehensive Sandy Hook videos:

Wolfgang Halbig’s 2-hour expert training in school safety versus what the evidence shows at Sandy Hook:

Independent Media Solidarity’s outstanding documentary, We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook:

Sofia Smallstorm’s outstanding 92-minute video, Unraveling Sandy Hook:


Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.


Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).


This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • MCB

    Outstanding work as always Carl! Thanks for all of your hard work bro. 🙂

  • BadClown

    Tells me somethin’ I doesn’t already know!

    • berger friedrich-wolfgang

      A Well-Manipulated SOCIETY , Wrapped in the “BELIEVE” , that “Dominating a Group of GAMBLERS” in “VIDEO – GAMES” , Somehow Equals / Mirrors “REALITY” , Proves it’s “Auto-Suggestive CHARACTER” !!!

  • joe

    Where are the arrests?The establishment brings more gun control measures instead..Wake up sheeple!

  • kimyo

    All of the 20 alleged victims’ families moved to Newtown between (pgs. 239 to 244), with 14 receiving their ~$500,000 homes for a recorded sales price of $0. (ten on Christmas Day, 2009), according to official government records.

    the above is unclear. is it possible you meant to include a date range after ‘between’?

    • Carl_Herman

      thanks, kimyo; I fixed it 🙂

    • Here it is on video. Mar 31, 2014 New Sandy Hook Bombshell! Everyone Got ‘FREE’ Houses

      New leads have been coming in lately, we are planning on doing another big video following up to our Sandy Hook Fully Exposed


  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi

    Sandy Hook Scam Complete-
    w/ many Sandy Hook Secrets

  • Strayhorse

    If there is enough evidence, anyone can call for a grand jury. Do do it.

    • ResearchGuy

      Depends on what you mean by “call for it.” In some states citizens have the authority to present evidence to a grand jury even if the prosecutor does not want them to. Interestingly New York is or has been one of those states. I called the appropriate court about that to see if the prosecutor had to be first given a chance to present the evidence that we have. I also try to find out if one could visit the room in order to help plan for the presentation. The court clerks had eight stereotypically New York attitude towards me as an outsider and wouldn’t give me enough time on the phone to figure out any of this stuff. Someone who lives in Manhattan would have to do that part of such an effort. Someone in Connecticut has to do the grand jury legwork in this case. These things take money, and for some reason all of us activists don’t seem to know how to raise money. Some irresponsible college student was able to get strangers to pay off her college tuition for her to the tune of $30,000 but we don’t seem to be able to get more than twelve cents together.

  • elizabethhanson

    Thank you Carl. I hadn’t paid attention to this before… I also heard a program on coast to coast last night… Jan. 3… My one nagging question is: How could “they” get a whole township of people to not talk about this… in other words, why isn’t anyone who lives there talking? There must be 10,000s of people not talking… This question nags at me…

    • Carl_Herman

      You’re welcome, Elizabeth. The way to find out is through arrests for these crimes, then get sworn statements. We really must stop allowing these crimes to continue when the evidence is overwhelmingly clear to arrest suspects and investigate all aspects of the apparent crime through professional and independent criminal investigation.

      Of course, all actors/players involved, including mayor, governor, and US president are involved as the evidence shows anyone looking would have already joined our side.

      • JerseyCynic

        I’ll add one more dot to connect

        Suing the state? Not unless he says yes


        from 2012:

        J. Paul Vance of Waterbury was nominated as Connecticutís new Claims Commissioner last year (would have been 2011). Vance is the gatekeeper who determines whether the state can be sued.

        Oh — and his father is Connecticut State Police Lt. Vance – the mouthpiece for the SH fiasco

      • Bev

        First arrest the truly dangerous neocons who really killed people during 9/11, who want World War III and who are true Nazis. The neolibs want-to-be-Nazis, or accommodating to Nazis, with their pretend violence, perhaps to avoid the real thing, should be lower on the list of dangerous people to deal with.

        Oh, to note C-span has lost (Error loading player: No playable sources found) their video interview of Richard Gage about the evidence for a controlled demolition of all three towers. However, it is still on youtube:


        MediaOne Services – Richard Gage: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
        MediaOne Studios


        Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth


        On September 11, 2001, the three worst structural failures in modern history took place when World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7 suffered complete and rapid destruction.

        In the aftermath of the tragedy, most members of the architecture and engineering community, as well as the general public, assumed that the buildings’ destruction had occurred as a result of the airplane impacts and fires. This view was reinforced by
        subsequent federal investigations, culminating in FEMA’s 2002 Building Performance Study and in the 2005 and 2008 reports by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

        Since 9/11, however, independent researchers around the world have assembled a large body of evidence that overwhelmingly refutes the notion that airplane impacts and fires
        caused the destruction of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. This body of evidence, most of which FEMA and NIST omitted from their reports, instead supports the troubling conclusion that all three skyscrapers were destroyed in a process known as “controlled demolition,” where explosives and/or other devices are used to bring down a building.


        Rapid onset of destruction,

        Constant acceleration at or near free-fall through what should have been the path of greatest resistance,

        Numerous eyewitness accounts of explosions including 118 FDNY personnel,

        Lateral ejection of multi-ton steel framing members distances of 600 feet at more than 60 mph,

        Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete, and large volumes of expanding pyroclastic-like dust clouds,

        Isolated explosive ejections 20 to 60 stories below the “crush zone,”

        Total destruction and dismemberment of all three buildings, with 220 floors each an acre in size missing from the Twin Towers’ debris pile,

        Several tons of molten steel/iron found in the debris piles,

        Evidence of thermite incendiaries on steel beams,

        Nanothermite composites and iron microspheres found in WTC dust samples.


        The following articles discuss and analyze the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. While most of these articles are intended for a general audience, the articles under “Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports” are geared toward readers with greater technical knowledge.

        60 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11

        World Trade Center Building 7

        Evidence for the Explosive Demolition of World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11


        Freefall and Building 7 on 9/11


        How Did They Know? Examining the Foreknowledge of Building 7’s Destruction


        Twin Towers

        Twin Towers Evidence Blows Away Fire Collapse Theory


        Lack of Deceleration of North Tower’s Upper Section Proves Use of Explosives


        What was the Molten Metal Seen Pouring Out of the South Tower Minutes Before its Collapse?


        High Temperatures, Persistent Heat & ‘Molten Steel’ at WTC Site Contradict Official Story


        Billions of Previously Molten Iron Spheres in WTC Dust, Reveal Use of Thermitic Materials


        Advanced Pyrotechnic or Explosive Material Discovered in WTC Dust


        Evidence Destroyed is Justice Denied


        Technical Critiques of the NIST Reports

        25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports


        The NIST Analyses – A Close Look at WTC 7


        How NIST Avoided a Real Analysis of the Physical Evidence of WTC Steel


        Critique of Popular Mechanics

        Debunking the Real 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechanics Can’t Face up to Reality


        The Psychology of 9/11

        Psychology Experts Speak Out: “Why is the 9/11 Evidence Difficult for Some to Accept?”


        Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11? A 20-Part Series



      • This was also a well done video investigation on Sandy Hook.

        Mar 31, 2014 New Sandy Hook Bombshell! Everyone Got ‘FREE’ Houses

        New leads have been coming in lately, we are planning on doing another big video following up to our Sandy Hook Fully Exposed


        • Julie Harbinger

          Perhaps marxist masons Soros, Brezinski and the saudi muslims etc. paid off this town and its people, so that it could run a jihad campaign on the kaffirs by striking fear into their hearts, by using this story as false propaganda. This scenario is being repeated regularly in America. Schools appear to be a main target.

          • It is even easier than that with this information and knowledge.

            After leaving The Washington Post in 1977, Carl Bernstein spent six months looking at the relationship of the CIA and the press during the Cold War years. His 25,000-word cover story, published in Rolling Stone on October 20, 1977, is reprinted below.


            How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and Why the Church Committee Covered It Up In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America’s leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.


          • FYI- Dec 9, 2015 US & Britain Planned Use of Islamic Extremists to Topple Syria ’57’ Years Ago

            BBC reports that – in 1957 – the British and American leaders approved the use of Islamic extremists and false flag attacks to topple the Syrian government: Nearly 50 years before the war in Iraq, Britain and America sought a secretive “regime change” in another Arab country… by planning the invasion of Syria and the assassination of leading figures.


    • Saying “how can so many people keep a secret?” is the #1 “tactic” of disputing a false flag or hoax. Not that I’m accusing you of it, but the declassified CIA memo of how to dispute those questioning the JFK assassination mentioned specifically to say to people “how can so many people keep a secret?”, and I’ve seen it for every false flag.

      One thing to keep in mind is the definition of “SECRET”. The definition is if the mainstream media doesn’t cover anyone questioning the false flag or hoax, then it’s a “secret”. They don’t mention that it ISN’T a secret OUTSIDE the mainstream media not mentioning it.

      • riversideCA

        They call it a ” national security letter” its offical blackmail

      • The_Magic_M

        I guess what elisabethhanson means is “How can 10,000 people keep quiet and not one of them talks?”.
        With all the things “OUTSIDE the mainstream media” you mention, there is not one participant of the alleged “hoax” who was willing to blow the whistle.
        Not even death threats can keep that many people silent.
        So why has no-one come forward to those “OUTSIDE the mainstream media” with his/her story?

        • Jo Peter

          It’s a rare person indeed who would be willing to get their entire family killed or ‘disappeared’ (which is undoubtedly one of the threats employed,) and it’s almost certain that they only involve people they already have leverage on in the conspiracy (evidence of child molestation, murders, kiddy porn, other skeletons in their closets,) and/or who are already ideologues supporting disamamemt for ‘the greater good’… Throw a few million bucks added ‘incentive’ on top, plus the credible threat of torturing their kids, nieces, nephews to death, threats given undue the authority of the ‘leader of the free world,’ all while convincing them that hardly anybody will believe them anyway, and people WILL remain quiet.

          • The_Magic_M

            Among 10,000+ people, not one who has no family, who is terminally ill with “nothing to lose”? Not one who can anonymously forward evidence to the press (if you don’t trust the media in general, what about Alex Jones, Michael Savage, Ed Snowden, Anonymous – not one of them got even an anonymous witness account)? This is simply unfathomable.
            If “they” are so powerful, why stage anything to begin with? Especially since no gun grab of any kind followed. If you already control everything so perfectly, there is no need to disarm the people, they will simply never know they’re being controlled (cf. The Matrix).

            It’s also a huge cognitive dissonance. You claim “they” can intimidate anyone into complying, yet somehow you think people would still use their guns to defend against “them”. That is incompatible. If “they” can coerce anyone, no-one would be fighting back, so it doesn’t matter whether people have guns or not. (Remember it’s one thing to say “I’ll fight to the death” but another to accept this will also be the end of your loved ones.)

            So no matter how you frame it, your conspiracist worldview isn’t even internally consistent (i.e. even accepting its “logic” for correct, you end up in a contradiction).

          • Jo Peter

            I’m not sure why you think it’s 10,000+. For something like Sandy Hook we are looking at a few hundred to a thousand knowing conspirators at most, a good chunk of those most likely already killed before they can change their mind, and what makes you think some haven’t already tried to blow the whistle (and end up committing ‘suicide’ with TWO bullets to the head, or with a gun nowhere to be found) and with what little evidence they can muster written off? (Do you really think a large number would be allowed to possess smoking gun physical proof?)

            I’m not sure what you mean by ‘so powerful’, it doesn’t take much to find an individual and their immediate family within the U.S., or at the border, and to make them dead (especially if you’re already keeping tabs on them.) These are capabilities that there is zero doubt the government has. This is assuming that most aren’t dead already.

          • The_Magic_M

            > For something like Sandy Hook we are looking at a few hundred to a thousand knowing conspirators at most

            O RLY? Families who keep living on with their children the Sandy Hookers claim are not dead and the entire neighbourhood not noticing it?

            > what makes you think some haven’t already tried to blow the whistle (and end up committing ‘suicide’ with TWO bullets to the head

            Idle speculation. Unless you can point to such cases, you are talking about speculative evidence for a speculative conspiracy. The point of every conspiracy theory is to have at least some “evidence” (in the widest sense) that supports it.
            You’re basically saying “to control us, the government has hatched Godzilla clones and a fifty foot Nixon robot, and who knows how many witnesses to that are already dead”.

            > but that when sufficiently angry, unified, and at critical mass can pose a real problem to their former ‘leaders’

            I thought the whole point of the “powerful secret cabal” theory was to present a scenario where the people can never know they are being controlled. The “omipotent conspiracy” that can silence thousands of people yet lets you expose their shenanigans on the internet without even trying to silence you. What makes *you* so special you are not being intiminated into silence, or just disposed of right out, just like the witnesses you claim were murdered?

            *That’s* the cognitive dissonance that strikes me most.
            (And the psychological explanation is that people like you want to feel “special” and “enlightened” and you somehow believe that if you were to “disappear”, people would start a revolution because you were so special that your disappearance simply can’t be ignored. Newsflash: you aren’t special.)

          • Jo Peter

            Not everyone believes that nobody died. That is just one of the more extreme skeptical views. While a possibility it does seem less likely…

            What is likely though is that it wasn’t a ‘lone shooter’ situation, that there was a conspiracy, with law enforcement and political involvement, and what is is absolutely undeniable is that it was used to manipulate public opinion for political reasons. The extent of what’s fake and what’s real is debatable, but to doubt the official narrative is smart, not naiive.

          • Carl_Herman

            Newsflash, Magic: you aren’t special and will earn the future you care to promote.

            Want to divert from facts on this case? How about war, too? And how about poverty?

            Hey, Magic: what effect do you see that having for your future?

            Choose where you care to work wisely: you’ll have what you earn.

          • The_Magic_M

            Nobody is special. I was addressing one subconscious motivation of a conspiracy believer (the other motivation is the fear of everything that appears uncontrollable, thus the belief that everything that happens must’ve had deliberate causes, giving comfort in the belief that you’d be able to control everything one day, too).

          • Christian McDaniel

            What do you know of Hasbara?

          • Carl_Herman

            Hey Magic: get out of your head with fucking theory and deal with the facts in this case. We work in reality.

            Play mind games with yourself if you refuse to address the facts under consideration.

          • The_Magic_M

            Facts? What facts? Idle speculation about “maybe witnesses were killed”?

    • sINCORED

      That is one question I have-why haven’t any of the residents around sandy Hook spoke up about this school being closed? Surely they would know better than anyone?

      • ResearchGuy

        That’s one of the things I would also like to know. In the case of other false flag attacks or other manipulated attacks, there haven’t been that many witnesses who weren’t also perpetrators.. So we would not expect them to come forward. But in this case there must’ve been hundreds or thousands of people who knew that Sandy Hook was not open, and who have seen other things inconsistent with the official story. I don’t understand why those people are not posting their observations, or contacting the key researchers, so that we would know what these witnesses have to say. It’s been three years and the same bastards behind this are the ones behind the attack in San Bernardino. We need to hurry up and do something about these things, people! I know they have more resources than we do, but come on! Why can’t we work together and make a stink so big that the media can’t ignore it? Why’s it always just a handful of researchers and their followers who know about these things? So you can’t sue the state without permission, big deal, you can still sue other entities, and you could make a big deal over the fact that you are trying to sue the state and someone connected with Sandy Hook won’t let you do it. You would think that would get even the attention of the idiot/traitor media.


    The Christmas tree evidence has been thoroughly debunked as someone found another close-up showing way more than 26 trees. Still, the trees were located in a peculiar yet convenient location.

    • Carl_Herman

      Thanks, TS; I removed that part.

  • Rich H

    I like to refer people to Washingtonsblog for it’s international reporting (which is quite good) and for some economic news.

    But this? How am I supposed to refer people with stories like this?

    • berger friedrich-wolfgang

      Google in “Youtube” for the History of “KHAZARS” !!!

      • Rich H

        I’ll check it out tonight. Thanks.

      • Julie Harbinger

        You think khazars have something to do with Sandy Hook?

    • Carl_Herman

      How could you not when the same “leaders” who fraudulently operate the economy in endless debt, fraud, and lies also manipulate the public?

      Rich H: did you read the article? If so, are the facts that you verified valid to prove we’re unlikely to have economic reforms from these same criminal leaders?

  • grandmacaesar

    Check out “The Life of Adam,” a new movie released during the last week of 2015, by the same people who made “We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook.”

  • Tony Mead

    Excellent work here !! Posted as headline on https://www.facebook.com/HoaxAtSandyHook/


    Thank you for a hard hitting expose’

  • Jim Rockford

    Fake lives matter.

  • Carl_Herman

    Dear Readers/Partners: I removed this paragraph that had this link: http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/busted-sandy-hooks-star-actor-david-wheeler/148711

    “Alleged father of an alleged shooting victim is actor, David Wheeler; photographed and filmed multiple times “acting” as a law enforcement officer at the school. Of course, this is prima facie evidence of a serious crime that causes his entire testimony to become non-credible.”

    The reason is because despite the one stunning photo that a reasonable person would conclude proves that the actor is the law enforcement agent, in this attack piece on Jim Tracy: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/fred-grimm/article52743100.html

    a commenter posted this video that seems to show it’s a legit agent, and the photo making David Wheeler look like that guy is a misdirection to deflect being caught in the hoax: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvP9dKw7_y8

    So! step by step. If you want to comment on the Miami Herald hit piece, feel free 🙂

    • Carl_Herman

      I removed two other points that commenters pointed-out are invalid:

      “The most-recognized photo of the event, alleged FBI escorting students away from the school, was staged. We know this as absolute fact because there are two photos of the same scene with children rearranged and evidence of “photoshop” errors. In addition, the temperature at the alleged time of the photo (10:30 AM) was ~25 degrees Fahrenheit; no evidence of frost or fogged-breath is present. This means the photo is a lie: it was not of students being evacuated in an emergency at Sandy Hook Elementary School. At least two takes with photoshop evidence means that whatever happened was NOT AN EMERGENCY. This demands arrests for criminal investigation, obviously.

      Four hours of police dashcam film showing the school’s parking lot outside the school shows zero students being evacuated as claimed by official reports (20 minutes to 25 minutes). The film should have showed ~600 students and adults being evacuated from the school and going past the parked police car to their alleged destination of the firehouse up the access road. The absence of students proves the official report is a lie, which again demands arrests for criminal investigation why our best evidence shows zero students were involved in this event.”

      The reason these are apparently invalid is that although a photographer and seemingly casual adults would have been removed by police in this area, official reports state that children were evacuated from the NE school exit, which would have had everyone pass by in a narrow walkway behind the police car with the documented dash cam showing no apparent class evacuations along the same route through the parking lot as the mentioned pictures. Documentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QoFOzR2nFc

      • Julie Harbinger

        The same people who perpetrated 9/11, did Sandy Hook, including the regular repeated scenarios country wide. Islamomarxists. They seek to spread fear and chaos, mainly distrust in the authorities and government, to sow a rebellious spirit and thereby destabilise a country. Just like the call to kill cops etc. These are classic tactics used by muslims and marxists the world over.

  • ResearchGuy

    The “free houses” thing isn’t good evidence. People often lie about how much they paid for a property in order to reduce the tax they would have to pay. I called the appropriate office in Connecticut a year or two ago and asked them whether they investigate to see whether someone really paid what they claim to have paid for a property. The clerk I spoke with said that they do not do that. Ooops.

    • Occams

      With multiply $0 house sales prices? Are you joking?

      • ResearchGuy

        No. To know what is suspicious, or outside the norm, you have to know what the norm is. Do you know what the norm is for that area? In fact, more specifically, you would have to know not only the average rate of $0 sales claimed for every given group of sales, but also their standard deviation. There’s plenty of strong evidence that the whole thing was a setup, so why include weak evidence? The other side will seize upon that and use it to “prove” how gullible we are.

        • ResearchGuy

          Another example of weak evidence is in reference to the San Bernardino attack, where a law enforcement officer giving a press conference referred to the actors, and people on our side go off half-cocked, crowing about how that was an admission that the accused couple weren’t really the shooters. Law enforcement uses the term “actors” as short for “bad actors,” that is, “people who took action.” Very simple English that for some reason people on our side like to pretend means something incriminating when it doesn’t. I can’t send stuff to serious people that contains poison pills like that. That is all they will focus on, and they will use it to dismiss everything else I might ever say.

  • ResearchGuy

    In another discussion — I believe it was about the San Bernardino attack — someone claimed that there is a video that debunks “we need to talk about Sandy Hook.” Does anybody know about that debunking video and have a point-for-point response to it? I doubt that that debunking video has an answer regarding the DNA and fingerprint evidence. I forget where that’s been presented. Sure would be nice if everything was all in one place!

  • Joe Palooka

    Breaking!!! Please download and reupload and share!!! David Wheeler is the weak link in the chain.
    Newtown NUKE! Sandy Hook FAKE FBI On TV (Smoking Gun PROOF)

  • MO

    Ok this is so dumb. The school was an active school. My nephew was a student there at the time, was in the building that day. You looked at a website? I doubt it because the school websites are all connected and I know they were updated because my daughter was going to the high school at the time. Sandy Hook School was not being used as storage. I am not sure how you got that but it is totally false. Look, Newtown had at the time private contractors who drove buses for the town to every school. Did you ask them if they dropped off at school or are you afraid to do some real investigation? How about the garbage company? Power and utilities? We’re the alleged photos taken in the summer or on a weekend? That school was even used during summers for various things. How about looking at the published budgets for the town that are published in the Newtown bee every single year in detail showing how much every teacher gets paid, the budgets for the schools and the various capital projects? Please folks, there is so much public information available about Newtown that anyone with half a brain could look it up themselves in dates prior to December 2012 and see it is an active school. We actually publish school lunches in the paper every week too. It is a small town and you know what they say about small towns, everyone knows everything

    You went to some website but not the source information. Shotty work that feeds your theory, but not real investigative reporting.

    None of the “memorials” we’re in existence before. Are you referring to the sign for the school? No shit, all our schools have a sign outside. That is not a memorial, it’s a sign. The only memorial in town before that was literally the solders and sailors statue on Main St.

    Sandy hook fire house video, I guess if it was shown in real time you’d see lots of folks in utter panic looking to locate their kids. Hysterical parents. The video is edited (complete with music) so this video is FAKE.

    • Carl_Herman

      MO: in order to prove “this is so dumb,” you have to address the factual claims to demonstrate how dumb they are. Let’s start with just one. How can you explain the second bullet point of the article? Here it is:

      “The Lanza home’s alleged police photographs were staged because the same rooms were photographed in up to four different arrangements of furniture and items (pgs. 117 to 138). These differences are major and obvious, as the photos show. This evidence means that this is NOT a crime scene, but a criminal hoax. It is not possible to have different and obvious versions of what the rooms look like.”

      If you can’t explain how this claim is “dumb,” then it might just be the opposite: a smart and obvious point that the official story is a criminal lie.

      With all respect, MO, can you explain the above point?

      • Julie Harbinger

        Americans should take a closer look at the various “officers” and “teachers” etc. involved in Sandy Hook. The truth might be clearer when we accept that it is a real incident that happened, was planned, but not by the instruction of your government, rather by agents infiltrated into the government and civil society, with the aim of waging jihad on the kaffir schools. These regular “atrocities” appear to have the goal of “striking fear into the hearts of the enemies of allah”, as well as the use of tech and mind control.

  • Rudewaitress

    This is another fucking lie to rile you crazies. My friend lost her nice at Sandy Hook…you are just brain dead, hate filled nuts….I thinkit it is a disgrace to use the bodies of young children to promote your ignorance…I am sending this to my friend…she will see the people that lost their children . hope they sue this fat ugly piece if shit!!! You all need a trip to a Twinkie farm!!!!

    • Carl_Herman

      What is the lie? Either address the evidence or all you have is denial.

      • Christian McDaniel

        Hasbara… Check out the photo — was that from the early 90s? I guess with a profile pic like that I will absolutely believe ‘she’ is an uneducated CT white trash stay at home mom, although no one like that would be related to anyone living in ‘New Town’.

  • PW


  • Michael Waters

    If I were a corrupt Deep Government, I’d want to infiltrate the alternative media who are my enemies.

    I’d bribe/extort/blackmail/coerce employees of Info Wars and Prison Planet to publish some ridiculous conspiracy theories. Infiltrating agents would be tasked with making ridiculous claims as well, thus giving cover of the REAL crimes the government is perpetrating, by making all people making claims look like kooks.

    The fear of being seen as a kook will keep enough people quiet, and enough people oblivious, to allow the psychopaths running the show privacy and primacy.

    Indeed, this is how they try to play the game.

  • mb

    Anyone who believes this was a hoax should have their heads examined. If the school wasn’t actually being used, wouldn’t someone from Sandy Hook come out and say that??? Did the hush the whole state of Connecticut? It was a school, it happened, it was a tragedy beyond comprehension, but give me a break.. So the whole town went to fake wakes and funerals with actors as greiving parents and noone noticed that they didnt know these parents? I knew every parent in my kids elementary school and if a kid died i would certainly know if it was the parents at their wake!!

  • Impulse Manslaughter


  • nancy williams

    Barny and Clyde had better weapons machine guns according to the movies.

  • Gary Hale

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vFdm4ENuNCs we promise you hope beyond this world. We promise you the gospel coming from the majestic God of the bible.

  • pbfrsox

    The smoking gun for me in this is the fact there is no possibility of a smoking gun. My brother is ex-military and has years of experience and training with weaponry. I myself have a fair amount of experience and have handled many different firearms and keep myself in good shape at 6’3″ 235 lbs. my brother is a little shorter 6’0″ 205 lbs approx. There is no way on God’s green earth either my brother or myself could have carried out the event in Connecticut. It’s doubtful either of us could have even effectively carried the payload this 150 lb autistic kid that was shy and didn’t like loud noises is purported to do. A 95 plus kill ratio? really? lol. That’s less likely than Oswald in Dallas lol but i digress. This to me is the most obvious. The kid could not have done this. 40 pounds of gear and clips he could not have managed to bring with him. There are so many other inconsistencies in the narrative from the school looking in disrepair to the everyone must check in sign to not having trauma helicopters and a constant stream of kids being airlifted. Anything like this i always look at as a jigsaw puzzle that you have to fit the pieces together to see what you have. In this case there just aren’t enough pieces to get a picture that makes sense. That is until you start looking at this as a drill and not an actual event. Then it starts to make some sense. But the thing that stuck out most in the beginning to me was that it just isn’t remotely believable that this scrawny kid with little or no firearms training randomly did this with no warning. The last thing i want to mention is this. Who shoots six year olds? Even kids who may have picked on or tortured during their upbringing would either seek out those responsible or those of the age when the bullying and bothering had the most impact. I find it absolutely far fetched and a near zero likelihood that even the most evil mental case would target 6 year olds.

  • Kim Richardson

    The new 86,000-square-foot school opened Friday for the first time to the media and the general public, containing no obvious memorials to the 26 people who died in December 2012, but officials said it was created with them in mind…. * https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/sandy-hook-school-opening-to-public-4-years-after-massacre/2016/07/29/b1603a80-5546-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_story.html

  • ghostlife

    Freely substitute “the 0.01%” with “globalist jews”

    • Carl_Herman

      If you say so, but the criminal .01% engaging in lie-started and illegal Wars of Aggression are not like any human beings with that religion who I know.

      You might want to upgrade your rhetoric. “Globalist Christians” “Globalist Whites” or whatever isn’t a sharp distinction.

      • ghostlife

        nice try, Rabbi Herman

        • Carl Herman

          If name-calling is all you want to contribute, you’ll remain at the kid’s table of Life. When you want an adult conversation, you have to address factual claims.

          Your Life, your call.

  • Clear thinking person

    Well based on this “logic” John Lennon is still alive. Yesss. He faked his death cause he didn’t want to endure a drawn out divorce from Yoko! Kennedy brothers too. And Keith Emerson didn’t shoot himself, it was his pet Gibbon!
    Yep Ken Kesey’s acid tests are still ongoing after 50 years since LSD became illegal. You guys should know. You were there.

    • Clear thinking person

      Besides why don’t folks say this stuff to some of those parents face to face. I’d like to see that.

      • Clear thinking person

        I see that this Wolfgang cat has been into it with one of those parents.
        Without much success too. His credentials aren’t that good. Head of security gets gun stolen by a student. Hey that’s a new theory. It’s was Wolfgang’s gun that was used at Sandy Hook and it was committed by the killer or killers of Tupac Shakur and BIG. See I just solved 3 notorious crimes right then. I’m smart. Geez conspiracy theorists have no respect for the dead and for those left living with what happened. Me? My niece was killed in a mass shooting.
        Have you? Have you idiots lost a family member like that?
        No you haven’t. Don’t let your mistrust of authority blind you to the facts and to allow you to denigrate the living’s pain.
        You don’t know compassion. You don’t know grief. And you don’t know nuthin’.

    • Carl_Herman

      Your statement is called “denial” along with a tone to insult the messenger. Would you care to address any of the evidence, or are insults and distraction all you’re here to contribute?

      • Clear thinking person

        Go to CT and ask for each one of those parents to please come clean. Go to all of them, the medical responders, police, etc. Spend all your resources to “get to the truth”. Go to their jobs, homes. Challenge them all.
        Think dude. There’s be hundreds maybe a couple thousand people in on this ” hoax” They’d all have to be paid handsomely to stay quiet.
        Pretty expensive. Wouldn’t someone with a guilty conscience come forward by now? Nope. And ten years from now there still won’t be anyone. Go guys hate America too much.

        • Clear thinking person

          Consider this. Where are the children? Gotta be in some witness protection program or something. Prior to this massacre those kids had a home, families, friends. Hoax? Really people? Come on.
          Now they’ve ” disappeared” like children in war torn countries.
          To me it’s insulting to all who were there and to all of “us” who felt horror and pain. Same goes bout 9/11, conspiracy people just don’t get it. They just don’t comprehend

          • Clear thinking person

            I’ll finish with this. For 30 years I worked as a photojournalist for Amnesty International and was in Iraq in March 1986 with a team of human rights workers to document and verify a report of a massacre that left almost 800 people dead. All were beheaded. That’s right BEHEADED! Ok? Most of them women and kids.
            So unlike you guys I’ve seen evil firsthand. Real evil. Not a dream. Not some hoax. Real dead people. I saw the aftermath.
            So please don’t tell me about senseless killings. I’ve been touched by that kind of evil.
            You haven’t.

          • Carl Herman

            You refuse to address the evidence, so there’s nothing to discuss with you other than “theories” that are called “a priori”: a story you tell that therefore must apply and be true for any conclusions without need to check any evidence.

            I won’t argue with you. The facts I’ve found are presented here for public consideration. If you wish to distract from factual consideration, go ahead: it’s beneficial for interested readers to consider the difference between your factless stories of what is and is not plausible versus allowing the factual evidence to show what happened.

            Your call, your Life, your karma. Make good choices, you’ll live with them.