Ms. Clinton made $3 million for ‘speeches’ to 12 ‘bail-out’ banks while ALWAYS CRIMINALLY SILENT on reneged official promises to end poverty

hat tip: The Intercept

The big deal about Ms. Clinton is the same for all “leaders” of both US political parties:

Ms. Clinton acted in Orwellian opposition to her Oath-sworn job as US Secretary of State with ongoing violations of the US Constitution through US Wars of Aggression, various US War Crimes, and support of other nations’ Wars of Aggression.

Consider her job to uphold the Department of State’s Mission Statement as she engaged in armed attacks around the world:

The Department’s mission is to shape and sustain a peaceful, prosperous, just, and democratic world and foster conditions for stability and progress for the benefit of the American people and people everywhere. This mission is shared with the USAID, ensuring we have a common path forward in partnership as we invest in the shared security and prosperity that will ultimately better prepare us for the challenges of tomorrow.

–From the FY 2014 Agency Financial Report

The actual mission of US political leaders is concisely expressed by Economic Hitman John Perkins in this artistic 2-minutes:

Of course, books shall be written when history is unleashed of so many more points that qualify Ms. Clinton only for prison rather than her current position to do further harm as president of the US.

Here’s one more data point: from 2013 to 2015, Ms. Clinton delivered 12 so-called “speeches” to bail-out benefited leading banks in exchange for her receiving $3 million. Together with her husband, the two received ~$139 million from “speeches,” advice, and telling their stories to corporate media book publishers from 2007 to 2014.

If we assume Ms. Clinton’s speeches were an hour in length, the $3 million Ms. Clinton was paid translates into ~$250,000 an hour.

We can add the following economic data to public demand for Ms. Clinton’s arrest, along with her fellow War Criminals and looters:

Importantly to contrast the actions of Ms. Clinton, her husband, and all other leaders as criminal compared to their Oaths and job descriptions, these “leaders” always remain silent on US reneged promises to end poverty. I was on a team who worked with the Clintons and Secretary of the Treasury Bob Rubin at the 1997 Microcredit Summit, that followed work of our team to help create the 1990 World Summit for Children. Bill refused to attend, and sent Hillary. Rubin and Ms. Clinton smiled, promised everything to end poverty, and then reneged on all promises, public and private.

You will never ever ever ever ever ever hear any leader speak of these reneged promises, and corporate media will never remind you. Consider how the NY Times “covered” the largest meeting of heads of state in world history to end poverty.

So let’s be clear: Ms. Clinton and her husband have taken nearly $150 million for themselves while taking no action for human beings so poor that ~ 30,000 children die daily from gruesomely slow and painful poverty.

This fits the International Criminal Court (ICC) definition:

“Crimes against humanity” include any of the following acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:

▪ murder;

▪ extermination;

▪ enslavement;…

▪ the crime of apartheid;

▪ other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering or serious bodily or mental injury.

Crucial to the case to prove Crimes against Humanity as intentional policy is the fact of ongoing “Developed Nations’” reneged promises to end poverty since 1969 (and here). Full documentation of all poverty facts is here; main points regarding solutions:

  • The developed nations promised a mere 0.7% of their income to end all aspects of global poverty. The US typically underfunds this promise by ~400% (providing just 1/4th the promise).
  • The American public believe we give 25% of our budget to foreign aid, and are willing to give 10% (~$380 billion for 2015). The amount invested is actually ~$30 billion/year. The US spends over $600 billion/year on the military. The total amount to end poverty is ~$100 billion combined from all the developed nations a year for ten years. In contrast to the policy we receive, the .01% oligarchs “legally” hide $20 to $30 trillion in offshore tax havens in a rigged-casino economy designed for “peak inequality.” This .01% parasitic loot is twenty to thirty times the amount to end global poverty forever.
  • Ending poverty reduces population growth rates in every historical case, reduces strains on resources, and according to the CIA is the best way to end global terrorism.

For Americans still zombiefied to “believe” in Ms. Clinton and other “leaders’” America, please embrace the reality that 40% of US children live at least one year of their lives in under-measured poverty, while oligarchs most responsible literally laugh in grandiose glee of the poverty they euphemise as “income inequality.” Please absorb this 1-minute reality check that includes Bob Rubin, Ms. Clinton’s partner for all promises reneged at the 1997 Microcredit Summit to end poverty while making a profit:

What is a solution?

I continue to assert a proven, obvious, and legal method:

We know for certain that until these .01% “leaders” are stopped, all we’ll have is ongoing lies, crimes, and immense suffering.

In just 90 seconds, former US Marine Ken O’Keefe powerfully states the “very obvious solutions” to US/UK/Israel unlawful Wars of Aggression: arrest the obvious criminal leaders (video starts at 20:51, then finishes this episode of Cross Talk):

None of us has the power to make this happen on our own, AND all of us have the power for honest full self-expression in good-faith effort.

**

Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.

**

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at Carl_Herman@post.harvard.edu

Note: Examiner.com has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).

**

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • JANUARY 07, 2015 The Rise of Inverted Fascist Democracy The Death of American Democracy

    Wednesday marks the anniversary of the first democratic election in America, held in 1789. Over the past half century, America has descended from a popular democracy into an inverted fascist democracy. An inverted fascist democracy is the new American system, because its self-proclaimed ideologies directly oppose its actual policies.

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/07/the-death-of-american-democracy/

  • MrLiberty

    Articles like this, and so many others we read nearly daily, appear to point to (or are often used to justify) proposals to “take the money out of politics (or elections).” But is money at the “front end” of the process really the problem? What if government no longer had the power to steal Americans’ income, borrow trillions of dollars on the promise that future incomes would be stolen to pay it back, or create money out of thin air in order to be able to hand out the trillions in bailouts, foreign aid, direct subsidies, lucrative contracts, support the overseas empire and all the other “special favors” government delivers to its “friends?” And what if the government “regulatory” apparatus no longer had the ability to pick winners and loser, protect companies from new competition, destroy entire markets, etc.? What would be the point of “buying” a candidate or other “connected” member of the government? What would be the point of making the lucrative “investment” in the “front end” of the political process if there would or could be NO payoff in the end? What might our country look like if government was in place to protect freedom – not friends, protect liberty – not destroy it for the benefit of others, and had so little power over our lives, our money, our economy, business interests, our incomes, our rights, and our freedoms that we gave its presence in our society nearly no concern? Before 1913 (and the Progressive Era), the primary interaction that most people had with the Federal Government was with the US Mail service – that’s it. Now, several books have well-documented the truth that nearly every American violates 3 federal laws EVERY DAY without even knowing it. Our government has created over $19Trillion in real debt and an estimated $250+Trillion in unfunded liabilities for such unsustainable programs as Social Security, Medicare, and the Part D Medicare drug program (on top of the $2+Trillion is takes from the productive sector of society through the income tax.

    The ONLY solution is to eliminate government power. The money on the front end can NEVER be controlled. The same two major parties that do the stealing and hand out the goodies for future payoffs are the ones who will write the laws. Major changes happened after the Watergate scandal and both major parties have been exploiting those “changes” to their own benefit ever since. But it will take a fundamental change in the mindset of Americans. There must be a profound support for an end to government power across the board. There can be no other way. Even the collapse of the current system under the weight of its own debt and corruption will mean nothing if the mindset on the other side promotes a new way of governance that is about freedom over government power.

  • hidflect

    We should take heart for one thing; 15 years ago articles like this barely existed. The internet is the greatest gift to man owned by nobody, existing everywhere and consisting of nothing but tiny electrons. And “they” want it. The Corporations. Brought to life by the Banks in IPO’s, creatures like FaceBook are already corralling the low hanging fruit of regions in Africa, nibbling away at the Internet’s domain. Not this year, not next. But eventually… they’ll get it all if laws to explicitly protect it aren’t wrought as powerful as the Constitution.

  • Jan 26, 2016 New Audio: Hillary Clinton’s Only Regret In State Department Email Scandal Is Getting Caught

    Not exactly helping your cause, Hillary!

    https://youtu.be/1EhKQq51YBQ