In 1997, Apple Stock Hit a 12-Year Low that Was At Least Partially Caused By a Single Sale of 1.5 Million Shares ($22.5 Million) By an Anonymous Party. This Helped Jobs Convince the Board to Oust the Old CEO and Appoint Jobs As the Replacement. Jobs Later Admitted to Being the Anonymous Party

Wikipedia notes:

During [former Apple CEO] Amelio’s tenure Apple’s stock continued to slump and hit a 12-year low in Q2 1997 that was at least partially caused by a single sale of 1.5 million shares of Apple stock on June 26 by an anonymous party who was later confirmed to be Steve Jobs. Apple lost another $708 million. On the July 4, 1997 weekend, Jobs convinced the directors to oust Amelio in a boardroom coup ….

The San Francisco Chronicle reported in 1997:

Steve Jobs has confirmed that he sold 1.5 million Apple shares in June …

This entry was posted in Business / Economics. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Joel W

    Piece o trash

    • kimyo

      if you had to pin 1984 on a single human being, it would be steve jobs.

      How the NSA Could Bug Your Powered-Off iPhone, and How to Stop Them

      Edward Snowden’s latest revelation about the NSA’s snooping inspired an extra dose of shock and disbelief when he said the agency’s hackers can use a mobile phone as a bug even after it’s been turned off.

      Apple denies knowledge of NSA’s ‘complete’ access to iPhone

      A leaked NSA document, posted by German newspaper Der Speigel, describes the “software implant for the Apple iPhone” that can be used to gather information from the phone: It can turn on the microphone and camera, intercept text messages, creep through a contact list and more.

      “Either [the NSA] have a huge collection of exploits that work against Apple products, meaning they are hoarding information about critical systems that American companies produce, and sabotaging them, or Apple sabotaged it themselves,” Appelbaum said at the Chaos Communication Conference in Hamburg

      • Joel W

        I think I can agree with you there.

  • It was a boardroom coup that had to happen, Apple under Amelio was going nowhere fast. It would have gone under without Steve Jobs.

    • kimyo

      which, as far as humanity is concerned, would have been a huge plus.

      that many fewer toys for the self-absorbed, built by slaves, a win for society, yes?

      couldn’t jobs at least have designed phones with replaceable batteries? a micro-sd slot? (does it really make sense to have to delete pictures in order to take pictures?)

      couldn’t jobs, at the very least, have programmed in a pop-up saying, ‘yo, bro, rotate your phone when shooting video!’? movies are wide/aren’t tall for a proper reason.

  • Nexusfast123

    Firstly, Apple is on an innovation downhill slope. Companies are generally founded around a single set of ‘pivotal’ technologies. Once they have extracted the innovation benefit they then start to iterate existing products and target niche markets – cheaper versions for instance.

    Secondly, we have probably hit peak smart phone where the consumer is more inclined to keep a phone longer and rivals are delivering cheaper and on par functionality. Without a new set of pivotal technologies Apple will continue to decline and it will be interesting to see what they do with the $200Billion in cash they have.

    These are issues that Jobs may not have had an answer for either.