Multiple video evidence of San Bernardino false flag attack: .01% plan for multiple false flags to ‘justify’ martial law, arrest ‘truthers’???

hat tips: all the activists making and communicating the following videos!

Put yourself in the shoes of the evil .01% for a few moments. How you roll is with Emperor’s New Clothes obvious crimes:

Got the picture of how the .01% roll?

Ok, now embrace the present that corporate media no longer can “cover” your crimes:

  • According to a 2007 poll by the Pew Research Center, the majority of the American public see the US major media news organizations as politically biased, inaccurate, and uncaring. Among those who use the Internet, two-thirds report that major media news do not care about the people they report on, 59% say the news is inaccurate, 64% see bias, and 53% summarize their view on major media news as, “failing to stand up for America.”
  • In their 2009 poll, “just 29% of Americans say that news organizations generally get the facts straight, while 63% say that news stories are often inaccurate.”
  • Gallup’s 2014 poll recorded the lowest ever US public confidence in accurate news reporting from corporate media’s television news: 18%.
  • A June 2010 Rasmussen poll found 66% of voters “angry” at the media, with 33% “very angry.” Rasmussen also found 70% “angry” at current federal government policies.
  • The most current Gallup poll in 2012 shows Americans’ distrust at an all-time high in the reporting from “mass media — such as newspapers, TV, and radio”: 60% have either “not very much” trust and confidence or “none at all” to “reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly.”

Got that picture, along with how you .01%-ers roll?

So you ask your advisors what to do. You receive something like this:

“Your masterships: the downfall of corporate media and uprise of independent media reporting comprehensive facts means that your Emperor’s New Clothes deception is certain to end. Trending media data that your propaganda is being replaced with truth makes this outcome absolutely certain. What is not certain, my lords, is when the tipping-point will occur; but when it does, your reign of lovely evil will end as quickly as anything else slamming to the ground when tipped-over. In respectful summary, my masters, you are fucked. The only way to avoid your demise is to win a rapid endgame of multiple false flag terror attacks to implement the martial law you’ve always dreamed of to rightly control your sheeple. This opening might win enough support among the ignorant to demonize “truthers” (no offense to your demonic magnificence with that term, my lords), throw their asses into FEMA camps, and end their lives at your sadistic pleasure. Hail Hydra. Hail Satan.”

You go with the advice and accelerate false flag attacks. You hire “crisis actors” to forward your agenda; paid persons given scripts to read to media to make sure the message you intend is delivered. Unfortunately for you, duping delight is apparent in the interviews: covert and overt smiles that professional law-enforcement instantly recognize as deception.

Your latest attempt is San Bernardino. You hope the public can’t see the following obvious flaws in your false flag. You initiate attack dogs to derail what you slur as “truthers.”

5-minute video: three witnesses of the San Bernardino shooting all testifying there were three shooters dressed in military gear:

*Dec. 15 note: An alert reader pointed-out an error I made in posting the following 30-second video: I had seen this individual as having been “injured” once, and walking around three times. The reader detailed how the injured woman had similar shirt color and hair, but was a different person! This is exactly why I wrote after the Paris attacks that whatever happened there, We the People have the power of endgame anytime we’re ready: demand arrests of .01% “leaders” for obvious crimes centering in war, money, and media lies to “cover” these crimes. We don’t have to jump through hoops to figure out what happened in the .01% crime du jour.

30-second video: apparently the same crisis actor appearing four times (see correction above):

1-minute video: corporate media “expert witnesses” refer to shooters as “actors” four times. Although this term might serve otherwise, consider it as a possible Freudian slip:

3-minute video: apparent crisis actor without sadness and showing apparent duping delight after allegedly her mother was killed in the shooting. Although responses will differ, I don’t buy her testimony as authentic.

3-minute video from We Are Change reminding us that Anderson Cooper (giving the interview above) was “trained” by the CIA in journalism, and with zero academic coursework in journalism:

11-minute video: two apparent crisis actors almost instantly smiling in duping delight when interviewed:

5-minute video: San Bernardino mayor showing dozens of brief smiles in apparent duping delight:


Note: I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History, with all economics factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences. I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.


Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History; also credentialed in Mathematics. He worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at

Note: has blocked public access to my articles on their site (and from other whistleblowers), so some links in my previous work are blocked. If you’d like to search for those articles other sites may have republished, use words from the article title within the blocked link. Or, go to, paste the expired link into the box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive. I’ll update as “hobby time” allows; including my earliest work from 2009 to 2011 (blocked author pages: here, here).


This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
  • colinjames71

    I don’t agree with the use of the term “actor” as telling of anything. That said, it’s unnecessary. Three shooters. Private military contractors I assume. The interview with the girl whose mother died was bizarre, if it was a one off thing I wouldn’t think much, but there’s too many instances of odd behavior, not indicative of greaving peoples.

    • Carl_Herman

      Thank you, colinjames71. Yup, military contractors as paid assassins to make the hit, disappear under police protection, then engage the corporate media acting.

      Yes: definitely non-grieving performance. I cover apparent “duping delight” with several other examples of alleged family and witnesses here:

      • “Yup, military contractors as paid assassins to make the hit, disappear under police protection……………” –> and throw 2 dead muslim patsies in a shot up SUV and say “WE GOT ‘EM!!!!!!!!!!!!!”. for weeks do “follow up ” stories like looking for hard drives in rivers, etc…release 1 “story” per week afterwards…..until the next false flag.

        • berger friedrich-wolfgang

          Jim FETZER , Proof. from “Veterans” Already Identified the “BOSTON BOMBING” as STAGED HOAX , With Blackwater GUYS as Real CULPRITS and TODAEVS as FRAMED PATSIES !!! Also the SCHOOL Massaker , Was Staged by the Gov. MINIONS , to get a Grip on Private ARMS !

          • Truth Hertz

            People, NOBODY DIED at these Hoaxes. The “Patsies” and “dead” either go into a “crisis actor protection program” where they are given new identities, or were CIA operatives that are also given new identities. For instance, the Todashev brothers are almost certainly back in Chechnya, working for the CIA uncle Ruslan. Wrestling teamates of the Zohar said it was not him in court.

          • berger friedrich-wolfgang

            OK ! BUT Why is the “PUBLIC” kept in the “DARK” of these “HOLLYWOOD PRODUCTIONS (???) and <<>>

          • I didn’t think of that, thanks for posting that.

      • colinjames71

        Have you written in this? The 2012 NDAA legalizing propaganda aimed at US citizens? It’s been on my mind lately. Obviously msm is almost pure propaganda for a long time, but more spin, bias, loaded terms and sloppy reporting than outright lying for the most part. Not counting lies by omission. Now, being legal, I’m assuming the money and planning for propaganda has gone into overdrive. Here’s the text:

        The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act (2012) reads:

        Sec. 501. (a) The Secretary and the Broadcasting Board of Governors are authorized to use funds appropriated or otherwise made available for public diplomacy information programs to provide for the preparation, dissemination, and use of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, its people, and its policies, through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the Internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers, instructors, and other direct or indirect means of communication.


        That seems like it could be interpreted to conduct hoax events. It certainly leaves the door wide open for all manner of nefarious activities. Not that it authorizes killing people, as I’m of the opinion most if not all mass shootings involve dead people. Besides the patsies. I prefer the term “staged” actually; hoax means fake and has connotations indicating practical joke; mischief, tomfoolery, things not deadly serious. Also the term false flag is bothering me but I can’t quite put my finger on why. Without the proper language we can’t accurately convey the significance, and of course the hoax and false flag memes get instantly associated with conspiracy theories, which turn people off before they give it a chance. Which is the whole point of using that label.

    • FBIkidnappedME

      If it’s lacking logic it’s a PSYOPS. They only show you what they want you to see. Oftentimes those who aren’t part of the PSYOPS will appear on camera so that their emotion appears genuine. Government has total control over the media and our mock elections. Don’t believe that this wasn’t a PSYOPS? Just ask Jewish Presidential candidate BERNie SANders if SAN BERNardino Muslims are planning attacks.

      • colinjames71

        Yeah it’s hard to know who’s in on it and who’s not sometimes. Compartmentalization. Then, people react to trauma and tragedy in different ways, plus being on camera that surely would affect the average person. Sometimes it’s just obvious. Let’s not forget also that the prohibition against conducting propaganda operations against US citizens was repealed- by the 2012 NDAA I believe. Not that it wasn’t going on, but now it’s officially sanctioned and I’m sure the money and planning for that went into high gear once it became legal. Again.

  • You should put this one under the video of the little girl outing the false flag with Anderson Coopers;

    • Carl_Herman

      Good idea!

  • diogenes

    The comments of Sally Abdelmageed in the third video are worth close listening to closely, particularly between 3:00 and 3:25, as an example of the tone of voice expressive of someone who has recently witnessed traumatic events and is recounting them. She audibly pulls herself together at two points in this passage. The contrast with the speech and demeanors of several alleged “crisis actors” is telling. Sally is convincing. So is Juan Hernandez. Not so with several others, at this purported event and at others.

  • Danvr

    This is just stupid! ‘Actor’ doesn’t just mean theatrical performer. It also means ‘doer’ (someone who takes a certain action or takes part in some affair). For example, Hitler and Stalin were ‘actors’ in WW2. Clearly it is in that sense that the word is being used in the above footage, and it doesn’t prove anything nefarious.

    • berger friedrich-wolfgang


      • diogenes

        Don’t you mean “shill on!!!” ?

    • Carl_Herman

      And, Danvr, your analysis on the overall factual content of the big picture is…?

      And how about this big picture, Danvr? I’ll allow Rene Descartes to speak of the human condition that we must earn breakthroughs into new light, then present the facts of unlawful US wars and parasitic/criminal US economics.

      “But now, after having once and for all put to the test the judgments of men, I here again approach these same questions regarding God and the human mind, and at the same time treat the beginnings of the whole of first philosophy, but in such a way that I have no expectation of approval from the vulgar and no wide audience of readers. Rather, I am an author to none who read these things but those who seriously meditate with me, who have the ability and the desire to withdraw their mind from the senses and at the same time from all prejudices. Such people I know all too well to be few and far between. As to those who do not take care to comprehend the order and series of my reasons but eagerly dispute over single conclusions by themselves, as is the custom for many-those, I say, will derive little benefit from a reading of this treatise; and although perhaps they might find an occasion for quibbling in many spots, still it is not an easy matter for them to raise an objection that is either compelling or worthy of response.”

      – Rene Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 1641, “Preface to the Reader.” Descartes is considered the founder of modern philosophy, the founder of analytical geometry (which led to calculus), and a founder of the Scientific Revolution. Descartes was well-known in his age, but highly controversial. His work was condemned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633, and his books put on the Index of Prohibited Books in 1663. The University of Utrecht condemned his work in 1643, where he had previously taught.

    • What about the OTHER 99 points/videos/footnotes in this article BESIDES that?

  • diogenes

    Carl, putting the video first that you have put first is problematical because the voice-over is trying to force a specific understanding on one word — it is a commenter on another commenter, objecting to word choice — peripheral to the issue.. Sally Abdelmageed and Juan Hernandez, on the contrary, are extremely convincing eyewitnesses giving live testimony to which the video gives us direct access. This is invaluable and should be placed first. (trust me, I have editorial skills.)

    • Carl_Herman

      ok! Thanks, diogenes. I very much appreciate your lifetime of education and experience. It shows 🙂

  • Dec 14, 2015 When Did People Stop Believing in Freedom?

    Almost every college student we asked today said that it is fine to give up their privacy to the government if it will keep them safe, especially from terrorists.

  • Des

    Thank you so much for putting your neck on the line for writing this article. Stay safe. Keep up the excellent work. We aren’t all sheeple. Some of us see exactly what kind of BS is going on here with ALL these false flag attacks!!!!!!!

  • respectfully

    The “actors” clip discredits an otherwise good piece of work.

    • diogenes

      Yes. There’s another video clip relating to this incident which features many minutes of copter footage and an authoritative voice-over telling us what we’re seeing. This technique, which figures also in the first video above, is a give-away that the video intends to indoctrinate, not inform by display of evidence. The testimony of Juan Hernandez and Sally Abdelmageed is exactly that, eyewitness testimony. We don’t need to be told what to hear. The witnesses speak for themselves and we can evaluate their honesty for ourselves. How honest do the narrators of the voice-overs sound? To me they sound like authoritarian bullies. I think what we have in these two videos and others is counter-propaganda designed to confuse and muddle discussion and cover telling evidence in a blizzard of false leads. Standard operating procedure in certain circles, it, too, amounts to a give away.

    • I disagree, the “actors” are the missing piece tying the whole thing together, along with the post-TV/media coverage of heart-tugging “actors” emotions afterwards. THAT is the final selling point: the post-false-flag “actors” interviews of emotional family members.

      • respectfully

        I don’t disagree there are actors, just that the first clip in which the term is used is no evidence of that. “Actors” used there is synonymous with “doer” as Danvr stated.

        • btw everyone: Operation Northwoods bullet item: MOCK FUNERALS (this was for the emotional sell and don’t question “victims” families out of disrespect…of non-existent dead people!!!):

          Look at #11 here: MOCK FUNERALS…even decades ago they knew how important the post-false-flag emotional sell by “victims” families was. I think this point is the least talked about/most important part of a FALSE FLAG. These are the actors’ interviews, etc…the actors’ “on the street” like the Harley-guy on 911, etc…:

          A. Incidents to establish a credible attack:

          (1) Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
          (2) Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
          (3) Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
          (4) Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
          (5) Blow up ammunition inside the base: start fires.
          (6) Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
          (7) Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base.
          (8) Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
          (9) Capture militia group which storms base.
          (10) Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires – naphthalene.
          (11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims.

  • Irish Proc

    Please take a look at this for more possible insight into what really happened