FEAR of Terrorism Is Much More Dangerous than Actual Terrorism

Fear of Terrorism Can Kill You …

Fear of terrorism can kill you:

A new study has found that long-term exposure to the threat of terrorism can elevate people’s resting heart rates and increase their risk of dying.

The study of more than 17,000 Israelis is the first statistics-based study, and the largest of its kind, that indicates that fear induced by consistent exposure to the threat of terrorism can lead to negative health consequences and increase the risk of mortality, according to researchers at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

The scientists explain:

“We found that fear of terrorism and existential anxiety may disrupt the control processes using acetylcholine, causing a chronic accelerated heart rate,” Soreq wrote in the press release. “Together with inflammation, these changes are associated with increased risk of heart attack and stroke.”

(In a 2004 study, Israeli scientists found that fear of terror increases inflammation.)

Swiss scientists also found that fear of terror damages the health of our hearts.

Because heart disease is a much bigger killer than terrorism, it is a bigger risk to our health.

Risk of Terrorism Is Low

We’ve extensively documented that the actual risk of terrorism is extremely low … even with ISIS and Al Qaeda.

For example, you’re much more likely to be killed by deer, cows, dogs, brain-eating parasites, toddlers, lightning, falling out of bed, alcoholism, food poisoning, choking on your meal, a financial crash, obesity, medical errors or “autoerotic asphyxiation” than by terrorists.

But what about weapons of mass destruction?

The Washington Post reports:

In the months following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, millions of Americans elected not to fly. A significant proportion decided to drive to their destinations instead. Driving is more dangerous than flying. And so one scholar of risk, Gerd Gigerenzer, calculated that more people died from the resulting automobile accidents than the total number of individuals who were killed aboard the four hijacked planes [on] Sept. 11.

But what about dirty bombs … bombs that disperse radioactive material?

Again, experts say that the risk of death from a dirty bomb is insignificant … but the risk of death from panicking after a dirty bomb is set off is high (see 43:47 through 45:54 in video):

DR THEODORE ROCKWELL, NUCLEAR SCIENTIST AND RADIATION RISK EXPERT: The deaths would be few, if any, and the answer is, probably none.


ROCKWELL: Yes. And that’s been said over and over again, but then people immediately say after that, “But, you know, people won’t believe that, and they’ll panic.” And then all the people working on this project, you know, the defense and so forth, breathe a big sigh of relief because they got their problem back: you know, we’re gonna all panic. I don’t think it would kill anybody and I think you’ll have trouble finding a serious report that would claim otherwise. The Department of Energy actually set up such a test and they actually measured what happened. And they—they—the measurements were extremely low. They calculated that the most exposed individual would get a fairly high dose—not life-threatening, but fairly high—and I checked into how the calculation was done, and they assume that after the attack, no one moves for one year. One year. Now, that’s ridiculous.

LEWIS Z. KOCH, BULLETIN OF ATOMIC SCIENTISTS: The dirty bomb—the danger from radioactivity is basically next to nothing. The danger from panic, however, is horrendous. That’s where the irony comes. This—instead of the government saying, “Look, this is not a serious weapon; the serious danger of this is the panic that would ensue, and there is no reason for panic. Don’t panic.”

Bottom line: Fear of terrorism is a lot more dangerous than terrorism.

Postscript: This isn’t to say that stopping terrorism isn’t important. It’s crucialHere’s how to stop it

This entry was posted in Politics / World News, Science / Technology. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Absolutely! December 7, 2015 Is it terrorism or is it religion? Does the question matter?

    “With or without religion, good people will do good things and bad people will do bad things. But for good people to do bad things—that takes religion.”—Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize-winning physicist


    • MrLiberty

      And for good and bad people to do really, really bad things it takes the support of government.

  • TED2015 Trevor Aaronson: How this FBI strategy is actually creating US-based terrorists

    There’s an organization responsible for more terrorism plots in the United States than al-Qaeda, al-Shabaab and ISIS combined. The FBI! How? Why?


  • colinjames71

    I’ve been waiting for the right post to say something about this, it was after Paris, Cameron actually said we have to live with fear, or fear is just a reality, crap now I can’t remember the quote. It was basically the opposite of FDR saying we h have nothing to fear but fear itself. I was appalled, I’m supposed I never saw a post on that line specifically, anywhere. Anyone else catch that? Good topic though, as fear is essential to the terrorism propaganda.

  • Dec 7, 2015 Obama’s National Address on Keeping America Safe *Edited for Accuracy*

    On December 6th, Obama addressed the nation on the San Bernardino shooting and ISIS. This is a condensed version, edited for accuracy.


    • MrLiberty

      Absolutely wonderful.