The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?

Presidents, Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police ADMIT to False Flag Terror

In the following instances, officials in the government which carried out the attack (or seriously proposed an attack) admit to it, either orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos:

(1) Japanese troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of Manchuria. This is known as the “Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal found: “Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a high-ranking Japanese army officer], have on various occasions admitted their part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’ was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the Kwantung Army ….” And see this.

(2) A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.

(3) Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson.

(4) Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland – as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland. Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.

(5) The Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute 22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely blamed it on the Nazis.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(8) The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

(9) The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

(11) The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this) (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this BBC special. They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK, and other countries.

False flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include – by way of example only:

(12) In 1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]“.

(13) Official State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they were all discussed as serious proposals.

(14) As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

(15) In 1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks on nations within the Organization of American States – such as Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on Cuba.

(16) The U.S. Department of Defense even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on Guantanamo.”

(17) The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

(18) A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that – as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

(19) A top Turkish general admitted that Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and blamed it on their enemy. He explained: “In Special War, certain acts of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.

(20) A declassified 1973 CIA document reveals a program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby traps, pretending that they were training them on how to investigate terrorist acts:

The Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign police/security organizations through its field stations ….

[CIA provides training sessions as follows:]

a. Providing trainees with basic knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and incendiaries as they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.

b. Introducing the trainees to commercially available materials and home laboratory techniques, likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.

c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target analysis and operational planning that a saboteur or terrorist must employ.

d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques giving practical experience with both manufactured and improvised devices through actual fabrication.


The program provides the trainees with ample opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges, incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.

(21) The German government admitted (and see this) that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner – a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service wished to frame the bombing on.

(22) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

(23) The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

(24) An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).

(25) The United States Army’s 1994 publication Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces – updated in 2004 – recommends employing terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty Wars“. And see this.

(26) Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr” for the cause. The manual was authenticated by the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that – during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan was confronted with the following question on national television:

At this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing, which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order to create martyrs.

(27) An Indonesian fact-finding team investigated violent riots which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were deliberately provoked”.

(28) Senior Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya (and see this report and this discussion).

(29) As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

(30)  At the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs were videotaped getting out of police cars, and were seen by an Italian MP carrying “iron bars inside the police station”.  Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa subsequently  admitted that police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent crackdown against protesters.

(31) The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo from the defense secretary – as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).

(32) Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

(33) According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

(34) The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.

(35) Police outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were filmed planting Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester

(36) Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

(37) Similarly, in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School – a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept of ‘netwar’ – called for western intelligence services to create new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups, as a way of undermining “real” terror networks. According to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s ‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already being implemented by the Pentagon:

“Under Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or terrorists

The new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want. And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities, said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”

(38) United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

(39) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

(40) Quebec police admitted that, in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually undercover Quebec police officers (and see this).

(41) A 2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as “paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations, expatriates, transnational terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism members, black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’” The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as “transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking, illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)

(42)  The former head of Secret Services and Head of State of Italy (Francesco Cossiga) advised the 2008 minister in charge of the police, on how to deal with protests from teachers and students:

He should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior … infiltrate the movement with agents provocateurs inclined to do anything …. And after that, with the strength of the gained population consent,  … beat them for blood and beat for blood also those teachers that incite them. Especially the teachers. Not the elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes.

(43) At the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of parliament saw plain clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.

(44) Egyptian politicians admitted (and see this) that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts in 2011 to try to discredit the protesters.

(45) Rioters who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the Mexican president in 2012 admitted that they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path. According to Wikipedia, photos also show the vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.

(46) A Colombian army colonel has admitted that his unit murdered 57 civilians, then dressed them in uniforms and claimed they were rebels killed in combat.

(47) On November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by army vehicles to participate in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping protests, as was shown by videos and pictures distributed via social networks.

(48) The highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar – recently admitted that the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.

(49) High-level American sources admitted that the Turkish government – a fellow NATO country – carried out the chemical weapons attacks blamed on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish government admitted on tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian government.

(50) The Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others. Ukrainian officials admit that the Ukrainian snipers fired on both sides, to create maximum chaos.

(51) Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.

(52) U.S. soldiers have admitted that if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop” automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they were militants

(53) Similarly, police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in 1981:

In police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.

Newsweek reported in 1999:

Perez, himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by telling an appalling story of attempted murder and a “throwdown”–police slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally justifiable. Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed 18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that Ovando had tried to shoot them during a stakeout.

Wikipedia notes:

As part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating gang members, planting evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked shootings.

(As a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks – police have been busted framing innocent people in many other ways, as well.)

(54) A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:

Most terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own security services.

(55) The head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office said that most terror attacks are committed by the CIA and FBI as false flags.  Similarly, the director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom said:

By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

(audio here).

(56) Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the “benefits” of of false flags to justify their political agenda:

Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin

Postscript: Private parties – such as NBC News, as well as Muslims, Jews, Scientologists, African-Americans and Neo-Nazis – play this game as well.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Tannenhouser

    Poof…. Now you see it……. Now you don’t…..any opposition to imperialist agenda I mean. I’m guessing that JT and the LIEberals in Canada will just roll over to TPP, as Well as CON-513845. Sigh…….. Barry’s version of ‘hope/change’ has made its way north of the 49th. Bring on the blue screen of death.

  • mulga mumblebrain

    All very interesting, but the MSM sewer dismisses it all as ‘conspiracy theories’, and for the brainwashed masses, that’s enough to not only shut them up, but get them increasing belligerent towards the non- brain dead members of the public. It will, in any case, if carried out by ‘terrorists’, have been done by psychotic gangsters recruited, financed, trained and armed by the USA and its ‘allies’, which is also denied with fury.

    • The far right is only ever able to appeal to the masses when they can scare the masses into believing that they’re under threat.

      Expect to lose more civil rights, the Neo-Cons need them to defend freedom.

      • Hidden Realities

        And the far left is the other wing of the same war mongering bird, which is why they dominate the MSM sewer and do their part to defend the ever expanding power of the State and their Military Complex as the answer to everything.

        • NO, The far left isn’t in the habit of war mongering, nor do they dominate the corporately owned MSM.

          Progressives are all about improving many different types of social infrastructure and allocating funding for them — as opposed to neglecting and privatizing these in order to fund defense spending.

          Progressives care about the health of the environment, as opposed to eliminating obstacles to economic growth when corporations are prevented from deliberately polluting the environment for the purpose of making a profit.

          The list goes on.

          Recommended reading, Chris Hedges: As a Socialist, I Have No Voice in the Mainstream

          • Иван

            I’ve been following Chris Hedges very closely lately. He is one hard-hitting, unbending, unappetizing Journalist. Much respect.

        • mulga mumblebrain

          ‘Far Left’ in the MSM??? Too much medication, or not enough?

      • amuncat

        Martial law in effect before the POTUS “election”! Bet’cha!

      • Max

        The left is just as bad, or worse. See #56 above: Those quotes are all by socialists or communists Adolph Hitler, Hermann Goering, Josef Stalin

        The left is just as bad, they just lie better to their constituency

  • Over 140 people dead in Paris, we have to ask the obvious question — Is it another false flag.

    No one claimed responsibility and even then it could still be faked.

    The claim has to be authenticated, you cannot simply point the bone and make an accusation.

    World leaders rushed to condemn the attacks, and French President François Hollande vowed revenge, though there was no immediate claim of responsibility. “We are going to lead a war which will be pitiless,” Hollande said outside the Bataclan concert hall, scene of the most bloodshed [NYT]

    Terrorist have nothing to gain from targeting civilians, quite the opposite in fact.

    War mongering Straussians have everything to gain, just like this article explained.

    • Gord Hicks

      Of course it’s another false flag. There will be no proof of anything the government and their corporate media stenographers claim. But the attackers, whoever they are, will be found guilty and the offical narrative sanctified in the court of public opinion which unfortunately is populated mostly by dumbed-down brainwashed zombies who think the TV tell them reality

  • Dutch Venter

    Of course decades of mass migration from the Islamic world is never mentioned by you people. When it comes to the present “refugee” crisis, does Europe really need another generation of Muslims being born and raised in Europe, feeling “aggrieved” by not living in an Islamic society and taking out their anger on us? Does Europe really need more of that? I don’t think so. End third world migration. But the elites and the left love anarchy.

    • Your blaming the refugees for being refugees, what you haven’t acknowledged is what actually caused these people to flee from a series of wars that Washington created, and which are supported by many so called ”western” governments.

      Remember that the GWOT was started under false pretense.

      • George Evans

        the obvious “losers “out of this are Muslims around the world..attacks against them will increase..and continue to be under reported…but the real losers will be the real people who try to convince their countrymen that the refugees are, simply, human beings who think and act no differently to them….

        people love scapegoats for their own gripes..and the refugees are so handy….

        I wish the real people who care well in persevering in their task….

        • That’s the strategy of the far right, the Neo-Cons simply have no policies that could be considered appealing to the masses,

          The Neo-Cons standard method is to deliberately use fear, in order to manipulate public consensus and unite people against an imaginary enemy, like during the cold war, if there isn’t one they’ll create one, like f.e. Gladio and Daesh.

          Consider reading these articles — Creating an “Arc of Crisis”: The Destabilization of the Middle East and Central Asia

          Check out this guy, Leo Straus

          Leo Strauss’ Philosophy of Deception

          • mulga mumblebrain

            As the real Osama said after 9/11, while denying al-Qaeda responsibility, the Zionists are working feverishly to set the Moslem world and the West at each other’s throats-and succeeding wildly.

          • That reminds me of an other often ignored issue — the MSM does not allow their views to be challenged, the last thing on their mind is people asking for verifiable evidence, where did you get that information, why do you believe that to be true.

            The MSM does not allow real discussions about their ”stories” to develop, not like we’re able to do on these forums, which are no doubt, closely monitored.

          • mulga mumblebrain

            Good God yes. I’ve been banned from so many forums for simply pointing out facts, that it’s quite funny. The whole Je Suis Charlie, ‘Freedom of Opinion’ crap is so preposterous as to ne quite funny.

          • Freedom of opinion should include the freedom for someone else to express their opposing view.

            Many good bloggers have been banned over the years by either forum manipulation or biased moderators.

            Wear it as a batch of honor, most do, or visit, ”The evacuation comment board” that I put up some years ago, , we never ban people nor delete comments (spam excepted)

            Just recently, the Charlie Hepdo site released a cartoon about the loss of the Russian plane which was in extremely bad taste — Charlie Hebdo signals that they might have double standards.

            Word is, they would not dare create one in a similar style or context about the sad events that have unfolded in Paris.

            Viva la France, I’ve lived in and cherish the good memories.

    • George Evans

      what about the decades of colonization and slavery followed by ALL Empires..when the Western Powers inherited the MIddle East from the Ottoman Empire…less than 100 years ago…the people there did not realize what lay in store for them…

      without pointing the bone, the Dutch did quite well out of their conquests too…

  • mksharma62

    Excellent presentation of explosive facts. However, though cautious analysis is required, it is not proper or correct to allege every terrorist operation as a false flag one either. We have to see also, overall what percentage of terrorist operations are admitted or proved false flag operations.

  • Blake

    No USS Liberty on here

    • Levrok Tant

      Botched false flags must not make the list.

      • TechinBris

        No matter what, somethings will always remain the same in the deplorable human family. Such as no one ever wanting to be responsible for anything that is stuffed up and finding someone else to blame for anything at all, so you wont be.

  • krybaby

    Difficult right now for me to assert that this is another, “False Flag”. I want the Muslim community–those who actually attend the Mosques, to rise up and condemn this behavior. Members of the Muslim groups must come out in force and in public and often, laying blame where the blame belongs. Newspapers, TV, radio, internet articles, etc. Just do it!

    The Muslim Koran tells it’s members to kill the infidels. The Muslims must demand that that part of their belief be questioned and eliminated. The following email was just sent to me:

    Let’s see, do I understand this thing correctly?

    The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim

    The Beltway Snipers were Muslims

    The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim

    The underwear Bomber was a Muslim

    The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims

    The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims

    The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims

    The London Subway Bombers were Muslims

    The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims

    The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims

    The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims

    The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims

    The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims

    The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims

    The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims

    The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims

    The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims

    The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims

    The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims

    The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims

    The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims

    The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims

    The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims

    The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims

    The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims

    Think of it:

    Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem

    Hindus living with Christians = No Problem

    Hindus living with Jews = No Problem

    Christians living with Shinto’s = No Problem

    Shinto’s living with Confucians = No Problem

    Confucians living with Baha’is = No Problem

    Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem

    Jews living with Atheists = No Problem

    Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem

    Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem

    Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem

    Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem

    Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem

    Christians living with Jews = No Problem

    Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem

    Buddhists living with Shinto’s = No Problem

    Shinto’s living with Atheists = No Problem

    Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem

    Confusions’ living with Hindus = No Problem


    Muslims living with Hindus = Problem

    Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem

    Muslims living with Christians = Problem

    Muslims living with Jews = Problem

    Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem

    Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem

    Muslims living with Shinto’s = Problem

    Muslims living with Atheists = Problem


    ***SO THIS LEADS TO ***

    They’re not happy in Indonesia

    They’re not happy in Gaza

    They’re not happy in Egypt

    They’re not happy in Libya

    They’re not happy in Morocco

    They’re not happy in Iran

    They’re not happy in Iraq

    They’re not happy in Yemen

    They’re not happy in Afghanistan

    They’re not happy in Pakistan

    They’re not happy in Syria

    They’re not happy in Lebanon

    They’re not happy in Nigeria

    They’re not happy in Kenya

    They’re not happy in Sudan

    *** So, where are they happy? ***

    They’re happy in Australia

    They’re happy in England

    They’re happy in Belgium

    They’re happy in France

    They’re happy in Italy

    They’re happy in Germany

    They’re happy in Sweden

    They’re happy in the USA & Canada

    They’re happy in Norway & India

    They’re happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

    And who do they blame? Not Islam… Not their leadership… Not themselves…



    I’m completely stumped…

    Any idea who might be causing the problem …???

    Religion of the devil.

    And we’re bringing them into America by the tens of thousands annually.

    So they are evil and we are stupid.

    The 2016 elections can’t get here fast enough. REH

    • False equivalency, f.e. just because someone of a certain ethnicity commits a crime does not automatically make criminals out of all the other people belonging to that same ethnic group.

      • Gord Hicks

        Especially when there is no or weak evidence connecting them to that crime and/or it turns out they were aided and abetted by people who were supposed to be stopping them

    • Two Americas

      What do you wish to see happen now?

      • mulga mumblebrain

        Genocide, of course. They all do. On both sides-Daash and its mirror images in the West.

        • Two Americas

          I find it interesting that you cannot get people to be explicit. They will claim that their “free speech” is being suppressed by “political correctness” so they can’t say what they are really thinking, which is that the entire Middle East should be nuked to oblivion. Cowards and bullies – one and the same.

    • Gord Hicks

      Please provide HARD evidence in each case that the perpetrators were Muslim

    • Tannenhouser

      Define Muslim. Yer CONfused and CONvoluted, ‘ideas’ are more of a ‘problem’ than Islam, IMO.
      It should Be a criminal offense to post such garbage. Most of what you typed above is actually demonstrably and observably FALSE. You should be ashamed of yourself.

      • mulga mumblebrain

        The Judeo-Christian West has killed tens of times as many Moslems in recent decades, as vice bersa, but racist xenophobes don’t count the deaths of untermenschen. It is a pure Nazi way of ‘thinking’.

      • amuncat

        Really? I work with juveniles! I experience juvenile “boys” who have gone back home to take care of “grandma” when they were between 10-14. Then they return as revolutionaries (the dope smoking intererred with the revolutionary efforts)! They come back with revolutionary rhetoric. Some Somali, have even said that they are going to join ISIS when they get out. Wanna know the sad part? They still don’t know if they are Sunni or shiite! But revolutionaries they are! LOL

    • Ozziejorge

      ERR …. “Bay of Tonkin” …. Muslims??
      Port Arthur in Tasmania …. Muslims????
      Nowhere NEAR PROVEN and trustworthy……

    • Brockland A.T.

      They did.

      Muslims worldwide have condemned the DAESH. The MSM just never promotes it much. We’re supposed to be suspicious of anything Islamic, after all,

      Perhaps the question should be, why don’t Christians condemn neoconservatism?

    • mulga mumblebrain

      As an Islamophobe, ie a racist and xenophobe, you simply ignore the repeated condemnation of Islamist terrorism, the vast majority of which victims are Moslems. You are the mirror image of the Islamists, the necessary complement for the Clash of Civilizations to really take off.

    • Krybaby, Your long list of items there proves, according to PC logic, that Muslims are peace-loving reasonable people.

      BTW, 90% of those in jail in the UK for terrorist offences are Muslim rather than Buddhist, Hindu, Athiest. That again, according to PC logic, proves that Muslims are no more likely to commit terrorist offences than anyone else.

    • amuncat

      I hope you are an insomniac because you will NEVER be able to rest your head! What peeps don’t realize is that they hate us!!! This is in spite of the fact that they come over and take our welfare …and indoor toilets (who wouldn’t), they still hate us!

      Muslim students in our largest local high school had a challenge for girls to experience “modesty” by wearing a burqa for a day/week! They called this modesty, we see it as suppression. The interesting thing is that the Muslim students didn’t reciprocate with a day wearing a mini skirt/dress with no burqa…Noooooooo!

  • Gord Hicks

    I found it unsurprising that the alleged attackers allegedly killed themselves. How convenient for the official narrative. Dead men tell no tales.

  • ctw

    In my book, Perverting the Promised Land, I quote the Welsh author, Gordon Thomas, who was in the presence of Pope JP2 in 1983 in which the pope stated that a religious war was being engineered. Now we have the present Jesuit pope making a statement that justifies another crusade. I think we are all being played. The Vatican allied itself with the Western powers in order to start a war which will allow the papacy to use their proxy western armies to kill all opposition in order to eventually re-take Jerusalem.

  • ctw
  • Brockland A.T.

    The thing to worry about here, is how well done this false flag was done, if it was a false flag. Apart from the body count, there aren’t many ground zero videos of the action the nitpick at, like there was for those claiming the Charlie Hebo attacks were largely staged.

    Its possible that the widespread claims of false-flag deterred, at least for a while, similar attacks. Unfortunately, if skeptism isn’t kept up, the temptation to double down next time remains.

    Its not totally seamless; finding a Syrian passport among deceased terrorists is peculiarly convenient, the same way a 9/11 hijacker passport was found by a passerby.

    One can buy into the idea that somehow a passport could miraculously get thrown clear of a firery airplane crash. However, a terrorist making sure to have his passport before a suicide attack is not so convincing.

  • AJ

    Excellent research!

  • Levrok Tant

    The Maidan shootings that were the last straw.

  • Liberal Disgust

    After reporting so well on specifics the blog destroys its credibility by stupidly making a postscript generality showing either ignorance, bigotry, racism, bias or a combination of these.

  • AnonOrlando

    This is a recent example in Burma (Myanmar). There are a few more examples from Burma within the full documentary itself.

    “The secret arms of the regime were notorious for their ‘dirty tricks’; infiltrating and manipulating rivals by turning them against each other.
    ‘These people secretly entered Muslim communities. They created problems by insulting Islam, hitting and attacking Muslims,’ said the former officer.
    He says the military still ‘takes advantage of people’s weaknesses, [their] lack of education and lack of general knowledge.’ His comments are a version of events that this journalist had heard repeatedly in Myanmar from people knowledgeable about the inner-workings of the political system.

    Sae Thein Win was a former major in the Myanmar army before he defected. ‘They had to distract the people,’ he told Al Jazeera. ‘They make people worry, spread fear, hatred, and create conflicts.’
    According to the former intelligence officer, the military is scared of transferring meaningful power to democratic institutions. ‘These power mongers are afraid of losing their position. They are therefore using religion for their political interest.'”

    Clip from documentary:
    Full documentary:

  • AnonOrlando

    This is a recent example from Kenya, committed by death squads:

    Interactive investigation:
    Full documentary:

  • Bighead1883

    We have a tweeter who told all the world @ 7.44 pm on Nov11 about the terrorist attack in Paris.

    Like many I went through his Time Line and found it real,that was last done 24 hrs ago by myself-not hearsay or secondhand knowledge

    Another Tweeter went to verify it less than two hours ago and the account is suspended.

    This account had massive tweets over the three days I went through.

    False flag? IMO yes

    Wikileaks is letting out many cables-here`s the latest for those not seeing it yet

    French Report ISIL Leader Is a JEW Mossad Agent.. true and links available..leak by Edward Snowden

    But here “The Saudi Cables”from Wikileaks really lets the cat out the bag and shows up the false flag op of the whole Syrian regime change-you`ll have to translate the page,you will be shocked

    • Bighead1883

      Anonymous ‏@YourAnonNews 33m33 minutes ago
      ANNOUNCE: #WikiLeaks will soon release 30 hours of tapes related to a billion dollar corruption scandal with links to the White House.

    • Well big boy the first question that came to mind — How many time zones are there in France and what was the exact location of the twitteree ?

      One thing is for sure, it is a miraculous thing that when suicide bombers blow themselves up, out of the blue a passport appears.

  • “Another tool would have our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist
    organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers,
    training camps and fundraising operations. It could launch fake
    terrorist operations…” – John Yoo, 2005

  • amuncat

    All of this aside. We have invested literally billions upon billions for national security. NSA has tapped into our everything. They even have cameras on the streets, tracking our every move as well as monitoring our phone calls and our PC’s, airports, you name it.

    Why with all of the information they have access to have they NEVER caught a “terrorist” BEFORE the crime is committed?!!! Even with the Boston Bombers, they admit that they had received prior intelligence and were “monitoring the situation”, but didn’t thwart the situation. Nevermind that it just happened to be on the day that special forces were practicing their bomb drills and the backpack that held the bomb was seen on a “special forces” guy and NOT on the back of either the “bombers”!!!

    The Somali kid in Portland who was suppose to set off an explosion during the xmas tree lighting in Portland was assisted by the FBI/CIA through the entire process.

    One thing that we should all question is, why is it that when something like this happens, including San Bernardino, do they suddenly know all the details about the person(s) as early as a few hours AFTER the incident has occurred instead of before…strange (NOT!)

  • spirittoo

    It’s like the cabal can’t come up with anything better than these false flag attacks. They count on the corporate media to spread the fear, so they can push their agenda.

  • Ohmyghj

    The money, the effort, the time, the intelligence, the man power, the resources all tell you that a terrorist is a fictional character like Superman. If a terrorist was real he would forget about building bombs because he could do far more damage building a corporation or even better joining a central bank. Does a “terrorist” blow stuff up then go home to his family? Does he go to school part-time to better himself? No he does not. He lives only in the fantasy of those dumb enough not to have any common sense or understanding of key words and phrases like; patsy, mercenary, frame-up and false-flag ideas like Project Northwoods. Unfortunately the average moron will never understand deduction but will always believe in pointless rhetoric. Therefore a “free” nation can never exist. It is only a dream.

  • Mr Reynard

    The First Question to Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It a False Flag?
    Then the second question should be,?? Do bears crap in the forest ???

  • Tim Hadfield

    Brussels attacks – Of course it’s another false flag.

  • Zionist Subversion of America

    Brussels is home to the capital of the EU, the headquarters of NATO, and the Great Synagogue of Europe, and these guys attacked a subway car and airport counter check-ins. So are these guys really this stupid or is some other force directing these attacks?

  • hvaiallverden

    The false flagg can be done on severall levels, one real attac and then spinn that one further as the case in Paris (fake theater images and so on), easy to kill inocent people, and how the f….. is an AK47 even managed to be smugle into an airport, an AK47 isnt an litle pee shooting thing.
    Yea, their “convinient” findings (like the infamous ID suddenly found untoched) is to me another clear sign of tampering, and wideing the cause into shadows, where they right now arrest anyone whom have been into contact with this persons, and all is of course labeled with war sice typings.
    I dont belive a word of it.
    And on topp of it, the terrorists where under survailance, and somehow, heres the deal, nothing happend.
    This leads me to the next openly logical conclution, someone wanted this to happend.
    Witch of course goes to the list above, nothing new here, even images I have seen litle bitt earlyer, confirms oddetys of this event, and is to the spinn offs, to create an wider theater.
    You know the rest.
    All to feed the MSM and spoon feed us bullshit an mass, to keep Their agenda going.
    This total survailance havent helped at all, and is conterporoductive, in that sense the data is so massive I wonder do the morons think about That.

    Im tired simply, and the fact they speek to us like we are equally stupid.