The Raping of America: Mile Markers on the Road to Fascism

By John Whitehead, constitutional and civil rights attorney, the Rutherford Institute.

“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.”—Martin Luther King Jr.

There’s an ill will blowing across the country. The economy is tanking. The people are directionless, and politics provides no answer. And like former regimes, the militarized police have stepped up to provide a façade of law and order manifested by an overt violence against the citizenry.

Despite the revelations of the past several years, nothing has changed to push back against the American police state. Our freedoms—especially the Fourth Amendment—continue to be choked out by a prevailing view among government bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on, probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time and for the slightest provocation.

Despite the recent outrage and protests, nothing has changed to restore us to our rightful role as having dominion over our bodies, our lives and our property, especially when it comes to interactions with the government.

Forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases—these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials. Thus far, the courts have done little to preserve our Fourth Amendment rights, let alone what shreds of bodily integrity remain to us.

Indeed, on a daily basis, Americans are being forced to relinquish the most intimate details of who we are—our biological makeup, our genetic blueprints, and our biometrics (facial characteristics and structure, fingerprints, iris scans, etc.)—in order to clear the nearly insurmountable hurdle that increasingly defines life in the United States.

In other words, we are all guilty until proven innocent.

Worst of all, it seems as if nothing will change as long as the American people remain distracted by politics, divided by their own prejudices, and brainwashed into believing that the Constitution still reigns supreme as the law of the land, when in fact, we have almost completed the shift into fascism.

In other words, despite our occasional bursts of outrage over abusive police practices, sporadic calls for government reform, and periodic bouts of awareness that all is not what it seems, the police state continues to march steadily onward.

Such is life in America today that individuals are being threatened with arrest and carted off to jail for the least hint of noncompliance, homes are being raided by police under the slightest pretext, and roadside police stops have devolved into government-sanctioned exercises in humiliation and degradation with a complete disregard for privacy and human dignity.

Consider, for example, what happened to Charnesia Corley after allegedly being pulled over by Texas police for “rolling” through a stop sign. Claiming they smelled marijuana, police handcuffed Corley, placed her in the back of the police cruiser, and then searched her car for almost an hour. They found nothing in the car.

As the Houston Chronicle reported:

Returning to his car where Corley was held, the deputy again said he smelled marijuana and called in a female deputy to conduct a cavity search. When the female deputy arrived, she told Corley to pull her pants down, but Corley protested because she was cuffed and had no underwear on. The deputy ordered Corley to bend over, pulled down her pants and began to search her. Then…Corley stood up and protested, so the deputy threw her to the ground and restrained her while another female was called in to assist. When backup arrived, each deputy held one of Corley’s legs apart to conduct the probe.

As shocking and disturbing as it seems, Corley’s roadside cavity search is becoming par for the course in an age in which police are taught to have no respect for the citizenry’s bodily integrity.

For instance, 38-year-old Angel Dobbs and her 24-year-old niece, Ashley, were pulled over by a Texas state trooper on July 13, 2012, allegedly for flicking cigarette butts out of the car window. Insisting that he smelled marijuana, he proceeded to interrogate them and search the car. Despite the fact that both women denied smoking or possessing any marijuana, the police officer then called in a female trooper, who carried out a roadside cavity search, sticking her fingers into the older woman’s anus and vagina, then performing the same procedure on the younger woman, wearing the same pair of gloves. No marijuana was found.

David Eckert was forced to undergo an anal cavity search, three enemas, and a colonoscopy after allegedly failing to yield to a stop sign at a Wal-Mart parking lot. Cops justified the searches on the grounds that they suspected Eckert was carrying drugs because his “posture [was] erect” and “he kept his legs together.” No drugs were found.

Leila Tarantino was subjected to two roadside strip searches in plain view of passing traffic during a routine traffic stop, while her two children—ages 1 and 4—waited inside her car. During the second strip search, presumably in an effort to ferret out drugs, a female officer “forcibly removed” a tampon from Tarantino. Nothing illegal was found. Nevertheless, such searches have been sanctioned by the courts, especially if accompanied by a search warrant (which is easily procured), as justified in the government’s pursuit of drugs and weapons.

Meanwhile, four Milwaukee police officers were charged with carrying out rectal searches of suspects on the street and in police district stations over the course of several years. One of the officers was accused of conducting searches of men’s anal and scrotal areas, often inserting his fingers into their rectums and leaving some of his victims with bleeding rectums. Halfway across the country, the city of Oakland, California, agreed to pay $4.6 million to 39 men who had their pants pulled down by police on city streets between 2002 and 2009.

It’s gotten so bad that you don’t even have to be suspected of possessing drugs to be subjected to a strip search.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Florence v. Burlison, any person who is arrested and processed at a jail house, regardless of the severity of his or her offense (i.e., they can be guilty of nothing more than a minor traffic offense), can be subjected to a strip search by police or jail officials without reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is carrying a weapon or contraband.

Examples of minor infractions which have resulted in strip searches include: individuals arrested for driving with a noisy muffler, driving with an inoperable headlight, failing to use a turn signal, riding a bicycle without an audible bell, making an improper left turn, engaging in an antiwar demonstration (the individual searched was a nun, a Sister of Divine Providence for 50 years). Police have also carried out strip searches for passing a bad check, dog leash violations, filing a false police report, failing to produce a driver’s license after making an illegal left turn, having outstanding parking tickets, and public intoxication. A failure to pay child support can also result in a strip search.

It must be remembered that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was intended to prevent government agents from searching an individual’s person or property without a warrant and probable cause (evidence that some kind of criminal activity was afoot). While the literal purpose of the amendment is to protect our property and our bodies from unwarranted government intrusion, the moral intention behind it is to protect our human dignity.

Unfortunately, the indignities being heaped upon us by the architects and agents of the American police state—whether or not we’ve done anything wrong—don’t end with roadside strip searches. They’re just a foretaste of what is to come.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the government doesn’t need to strip you naked by the side of the road in order to render you helpless. It has other methods, less subtle perhaps but equally humiliating, devastating and mind-altering, of stripping you of your independence, robbing you of your dignity, and undermining your rights.

With every court ruling that allows the government to operate above the rule of law, every piece of legislation that limits our freedoms, and every act of government wrongdoing that goes unpunished, we’re slowly being conditioned to a society in which we have little real control over our lives. As Rod Serling, creator of the Twilight Zone and an insightful commentator on human nature, once observed, “We’re developing a new citizenry. One that will be very selective about cereals and automobiles, but won’t be able to think.”

Indeed, not only are we developing a new citizenry incapable of thinking for themselves, we’re also instilling in them a complete and utter reliance on the government and its corporate partners to do everything for them—tell them what to eat, what to wear, how to think, what to believe, how long to sleep, who to vote for, whom to associate with, and on and on.

In this way, we have created a welfare state, a nanny state, a police state, a surveillance state, an electronic concentration camp—call it what you will, the meaning is the same: in our quest for less personal responsibility, a greater sense of security, and no burdensome obligations to each other or to future generations, we have created a society in which we have no true freedom.

Government surveillance, police abuse, SWAT team raids, economic instability, asset forfeiture schemes, pork barrel legislation, militarized police, drones, endless wars, private prisons, involuntary detentions, biometrics databases, free speech zones, etc.: these are mile markers on the road to a fascist state where citizens are treated like cattle, to be branded and eventually led to the slaughterhouse.

If there is any hope to be found it will be found in local, grassroots activism. In the words of Martin Luther King Jr., it’s time for “militant nonviolent resistance.”

First, however, Americans must break free of the apathy-inducing turpor of politics, entertainment spectacles and manufactured news. Only once we are free of the chains that bind us—or to be more exact, the chains that “blind” us—can we become actively aware of the injustices taking place around us and demand freedom of our oppressors.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Oct 18, 2013 The War Powers Resolution

    Sep 18, 2014 Why The War Powers Act is Completely Worthless

  • How many Trillions are lost just in one year alone? You will never view or hear this in the states!

    Feb 11, 2014 Corporatocracy: How the Corporate Welfare State Divides and Conquers

    A small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy. You couldn’t ask for a more perfect system of control.

  • August 26th, 2015 The Age of Imperial Wars

    2015 has become a year of living dangerously. Wars are spreading across the globe. Wars are escalating as new countries are bombed and the old are ravaged with ever greater intensity. Countries, where relatively peaceful changes had taken place through recent elections, are now on the verge of civil wars.

  • jadan

    People can react locally where they have control over the police. Sheriff’s are elected and can be voted out if their people misbehave. The police to fear are the unelected cops, the FBI, and the secret police, DEA, ATF and private contractors, even though local Texas thugs working for corrupt departments get all the press. People can vote. They can protest the corruption of black box voting, and they can vote for Bernie Sanders. In fact, voting Sanders is the last chance Americans will have to push back the police state. What other candidate has spoken out more loudly and consistently against police brutality than Sanders?

    • gamesjon

      The point (I believe) of the article is to remind people that this whole system works because we allow it to work. As people have throughout history we (the masses) are kept divided and bickering among ourselves while those at the top plunder with impunity. We don’t “have” to vote in candidates to change thing… if people could come together we can force the system to change. Why do police get away with brutality? Because everyone around when it happens allows it to happen unimpeded while yelling and filming at the side or when they hear about it happening if no one is around they merely protest against it. Why can the government carry out the pages of crimes it has? Because people just organize a protest to “voice” their disapproval and threaten (sometimes succeeding) to vote this or that person out of office.

      In the most totalitarian societies to the most democratic the “power” is always on the side of those governed (hence the phrase deriving powers from the consent of the governed). People created all these structures in life and people can just as easily take them down when they stop doing what they should be. But, it takes people being organized and working together to do these things. It’s been obvious for many years that America’s political system is corrupt beyond recognition and as much as I support Bernie Sanders what would he be able to do if elected? Contrary to all the outraged yelling by certain people over the last 6 or 7 years the President is not all that powerful legislatively. Instead of just Republican opposition to policies Bernie would be facing Republicans and a lot of Democratic opposition. Our system is set up to prevent sudden, major change in politics/government and generations allowed things to progress to where they are that all those “checks and balances” and what have you now operate against people in trying to fix things.

      People a lot of times make comparisons to the Vietnam-era protests and wonder why people don’t do that now. As someone who is 26 I would just like to say I think it is logistical honestly. I live in a rather small town in southeast Missouri so whenever there were protests, the closest ones were the Occupy protests that occurred in St. Louis (and the Michael Brown ones in Ferguson,) but even that is 3 hours away. How did the 60’s protesters manage things like
      travel expenses
      how did you juggle work schedules (since I could potentially find someone to switch shifts and get maybe 2 days off before needing to be at work or losing my job)
      with all the mass arrests for frivolous reasons is also fines/bail costs + probably not making it back to work and losing job
      where would you stay at night (since cash is short as is hotels/motels are out)… and as far as the huge protests in like DC or New York those are out because I couldn’t afford it nor could I manage to get the time off work for it.

      I feel that those sort of hurdles make a huge impact on a lot of people. I mean maybe it is that people in my generation just wouldn’t do those sort of huge protests…. but I know personally it was issues like the ones I mentioned that prevented me from even going to the Occupy ones in St. Louis when they happened. No one has much to spare in case one of those negatives did occur and I already catch s**t from every angle about how entitled and lazy my generation is so if one of them does happen it will merely re-affirm people’s ideas about people my age. By the way if anyone has any real answers to those issues listed and other practical logistical problems like that I would love to hear them because I’m not trying to whine about things, but merely try and provide some explanation for the lack of action by young people (especially when I feel like it would be there).

  • nomadfiles

    “Forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws, forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, forced inclusion in biometric databases—these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials.”

    That’s the tipping point isn’t it? Your rights have become a privilege to be granted or not at the discretion of the government and its deeply flawed agents. If they have taken away the right to control what is done to your body, then you have become property. You are no longer a citizen but a slave.