The Coming Era of Pension Poverty

The core problem with pension plans is that the promises were issued without regard for the revenues needed to pay the promises. Lulled by 60 years of global growth since 1945, those in charge of entitlements and publicly funded pensions assumed that “growth”–of GDP, tax revenues, employment and everything else–would always rise faster than the costs of the promised pensions and entitlements.

But due to demographics and a structurally stagnant economy, entitlements and pension costs are rising at a much faster rate than the revenues needed to pay the promised benefits. Two charts (courtesy of Market Daily Briefing) tell the demographic story:

As the 60+ million baby Boom began qualifying for Social Security and Medicare entitlements, the percentage of beneficiaries rose quickly from a decades-long level of about 16% of the total population to 18.5%. This might seem like much, but what’s troubling is the steep rise in the number of beneficiaries while the number of full-time workers who pay the vast majority of the income taxes has remained stagnant:

Federal social spending (entitlements) has almost tripled from 5% of GDP to 14% while federal tax revenues/spending have remained range-bound as a percentage of GDP. In other words, social spending is soaring as a percentage of the economy (GDP) while revenues to support that spending are limited by the slow-growing economy and the correlation between high tax rates and recessions.

The other structural headwind is low investment returns in a zero-interest rate global economy. The only way to increase yields is to take on more risk, a strategy that has potentially catastrophic consequences: Pension Funds Are “Compromising Their Solvency” OECD Warns.

Any criticism of rapidly rising public pension costs quickly draws accusations of union-bashing, a favored propaganda technique to divert investigation of blatant abuse of the system. Since I have cousins who have retired from California police and firefighter jobs, I know all the insider games and tricks that many public employees can use to boost their pensions and benefits.

The issue isn’t unions, it’s the systemic abuse of public trust and public funds.

Buying political influence with campaign contributions doesn’t mean promised public-employee pensions and benefits will align with tax revenues and yields on pension funds. The global economy is due for a recession and an extended period of slow growth/stagnation as the Great Deleveraging of credit/asset bubbles strips away phantom collateral and pops all the bubbles. This global deleveraging will occur whether we like it or not, and refusing to consider massive losses in pension-fund owned assets and declining tax revenues will only lead to greater fiscal imbalances/crises down the road.

The usual excuse for insider abuse is “everybody does it.” What this means is “everybody on the public payroll who can get away with it does it.” The private sector doesn’t offer tricks like doubling your overtime in your last year of service to plump up your pension, or getting cashed out of your sick leave and unused vacation time to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars:

Ex-Transit Agency boss tops SF list with half-million payout

sick leave policy can pad healthy paycheck

In the real world, these benefits vanish if you don’t use them within the allotted time.

Promises made in flush times cannot be kept in lean times. Common sense suggests that public employee pension benefits should be tied to the revenues required to pay them and the rate of low-risk returns on pension funds. If common-sense is “union bashing,” then we not only have a pension-funding problem, we have a propaganda problem.

Regardless of what was promised, what can’t be paid won’t be paid. The federal government can print money, but state and local governments cannot print money to pay soaring pension and healthcare costs. Push taxes and junk fees up enough and you will spark a taxpayer rebellion. If you doubt this, check out the origins of Prop 13 limits on property taxes in California.

I have suggested that the federal government eliminate the Social Security payroll tax and just print the money for Social Security pensions: How About Ending Social Security and Paying Retirees with Cash? (November 15, 2013)

The reason why this is practical is the Social Security system is not open-ended like Medicare; costs can be fairly accurately predicted, and SSA pensions are limited. In a deflationary $17 trillion economy, printing $1 trillion and distributing it to tens of millions of beneficiaries, most of whom paid SSA payroll taxes for decades, would not be enough to spark systemic inflation. (The Federal Reserve, so desperate to generate inflation, should jump on the prospect of goosing some mild inflation via broad-based spending by tens of millions of households.)

Assuming “growth” will fund all promised pensions and entitlements is magical thinking. We’re going to have to do better than indulge our Spoiled Brat Economy mindset because “we wuz promised.” What we were promised based on faulty assumptions, faulty projections and wishful thinking no longer matters.

Gordon T. Long and I discuss these systemic issues in a video program:

The Coming Era of Pension Poverity (26:16, video).


This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Robert Finnegan

    Not once here does the author mention the fact that government looting of Social Security is in fact the reason for any future “insolvency.” There is no other reason for the failure of the most successful retirement program in U.S. history.

    It is the self-entitled, lazy, uneducated, useless so-called “millennials” that want everything handed to them, rather than the men and women that worked and contributed to this program through MANDATORY PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS throughout their working lifetime that made it possible for them to become the parasites that they are on American society today. And now they would deem to rob the very people that made their pathetic existence possible in the first place – including their own parents.

    Just wait until the author here and his apologists find themselves having a catastrophic accident or illness and in need of these benefits. There is no such thing as “entitlements,” this is nothing more than a transparent code word for the robbery of cash contributions of workers made over a lifetime of hard work.

    I cannot speak for other individuals that have paid TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars into the Social Security program, but as for myself I WANT MY MONEY BACK.

    Robert S. Finnegan
    The 5th Estate Asia
    Jakarta, Indonesia

  • jadan

    Social security taxes are paid on a certain amount of income. If you make blah blah income up to the maximum wage base, you pay on that income, and nothing on the amount above it. It’s a flat tax. Eliminate the income limit and impose social security taxes on all income. This means tax the wealthy, weathier, and wealthiest. This latter means you, billionaires, reading this flaming blog. Whatsa matter, Smith, you afraid to declare war on billionaires and their followers? Here’s your penance, Smith. You need to read one Bernie Sanders speech per day until you get over your tendencies to be a lap dog for the rich. Tax ’em! Tax ’em good.

  • While everything in your article is spot Mr. Smith, there is this mammoth parasite eating and eroding everything it touches or comes in contact with that you never hear or view here in the states for obvious reasons. This video comes with a report from across the pond as some would say!

    How to Herd Your Tax Cattle

    Did you ever wonder how we keep people fighting with each other? Or obeying our silly rules? Or actually loving their captors and slavemasters? This morning we’re going to brief you on just that. Are you ready to begin?

  • 01/26/2015 The Middle Class Evaporates, Global Oligarchs Plan Their Escape Form The Impoverished Pleb Masses

    The middle class has shrunk consistently over the past half-century. Until 2000, the reason was primarily because more Americans moved up the income ladder. But since then, the reason has shifted: There is a greater share of households on the lower rungs of the economic ladder.

    Bankster War’s make U.S. all Poor!

  • How The Democrats Caused The Financial Crisis Starring HUD Sec Andrew Cuomo, and Barack Obama

    Barney Frank Does Not Believe a Housing Bubble Exists Although He Created it 2005