NATO Member Busted Massively Supporting ISIS … Now Declares War Against ISIS, But Instead Bombs Its Political Rival (Which Is the Most Effective Force FIGHTING ISIS)

Turkey Enabling ISIS

NATO member Turkey has been busted supporting ISIS.

The Guardian reported this week:

US special forces raided the compound of an Islamic State leader in eastern Syria in May, they made sure not to tell the neighbours.

The target of that raid, the first of its kind since US jets returned to the skies over Iraq last August, was an Isis official responsible for oil smuggling, named Abu Sayyaf. He was almost unheard of outside the upper echelons of the terror group, but he was well known to Turkey. From mid-2013, the Tunisian fighter had been responsible for smuggling oil from Syria’s eastern fields, which the group had by then commandeered. Black market oil quickly became the main driver of Isis revenues – and Turkish buyers were its main clients.

As a result, the oil trade between the jihadis and the Turks was held up as evidence of an alliance between the two.


In the wake of the raid that killed Abu Sayyaf, suspicions of an undeclared alliance have hardened. One senior western official familiar with the intelligence gathered at the slain leader’s compound said that direct dealings between Turkish officials and ranking Isis members was now “undeniable”.

“There are hundreds of flash drives and documents that were seized there,” the official told the Observer. “They are being analysed at the moment, but the links are already so clear that they could end up having profound policy implications for the relationship between us and Ankara.”


However, Turkey has openly supported other jihadi groups, such as Ahrar al-Sham, which espouses much of al-Qaida’s ideology, and Jabhat al-Nusra, which is proscribed as a terror organisation by much of the US and Europe. “The distinctions they draw [with other opposition groups] are thin indeed,” said the western official. “There is no doubt at all that they militarily cooperate with both.”


One Isis member says the organisation remains a long way from establishing a self-sustaining economy across the area of Syria and Iraq it controls. “They need the Turks. I know of a lot of cooperation and it scares me,” he said. “I don’t see how Turkey can attack the organisation too hard. There are shared interests.”

While the Guardian is one of Britain’s leading newspapers, many in the alternative press have long pointed out Turkey’s support for ISIS.

And experts, Kurds, and Joe Biden have accuses Turkey of enabling ISIS.

Has Turkey Changed Its Ways?

On Tuesday, Turkey proclaimed that it will now help to fight ISIS.

Don’t buy it …

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson – former chief of staff to Colin Powell, and now distinguished adjunct professor of Government and Public Policy at William & Mary – asked yesterday:

What is [Turkish president] Erdogan’s ultimate purpose? He hates Assad. He’d love to bring him down. Is that why he’s doing this?

There’s also the Kurds …

As Time Magazine pointed out in June:

Ethnic Kurds—who on Tuesday scored their second and third significant victories over ISIS in the space of eight days—are by far the most effective force fighting ISIS in both Iraq and Syria.

And yet Turkey is trying to destroy the Kurds. Time writes:

Since [Turkey announced that it was joining the war against ISIS] it has arrested more than 1,000 people in Turkey and carried out waves of air raids in neighboring Syria and Iraq. But most of those arrests and air strikes, say Kurdish leaders, have hit Kurdish and left wing groups, not ISIS.


Kurds are an ethnic minority that live in parts of Syria, Iraq, Turkey and Iran. They have been persecuted for decades — from Turkey’s suppression of Kurdish identity and banning of Kurdish language to Saddam Hussein’s use of chemical weapons on Kurdish communities. Their leaders, from the numerous different parties and rebel groups that represent them, have long sought an independent Kurdish state encompassing that territory and have fought against their respective governments to try to achieve that.


Hoshang Waziri, a political analyst based in Erbil, says the Kurds’ recent territorial gains in Syria along Turkey’s border and their increasing political legitimacy in the eyes of the West, have made the Kurds a bigger threat to Turkey than ISIS. “The fear of the Turkish state started with the Kurdish defeat of ISIS in Tel Abyad,” says Waziri.


“The image in the West of the Kurds as a reliable ally on the ground is terrifying for Turkey,” says Waziri. “So before it’s too late, Turkey waged its war — not against ISIS, but against the PKK.”


Some see the war against ISIS simply as a cover for an attack on Kurdish groups. Of the more than 1,000 people Turkey has arrested in security sweeps in recent days, 80% are Kurdish, associated either with the PKK or the non-violent Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), says İbrahim Ayhan, a member of parliament for the HDP.


Ayhan says the AKP needs a state of “chaos” to perusade voters that it is the only bulwark against chaos. As of yet no new government has been formed in Turkey and if that doesn’t happen in the next few weeks, new elections will be called. By that time Ayhad fears many of the leaders of his HDP party will be in jail and some even worry the HDP will be outlawed. At the same time, Erdoğan and his AKP hope they will have shown only they can defend Turkey from internal and external threats.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

Turkey’s military activity against Islamic State does not stem from sudden realizations about threats from ISIS but appears designed to elicit international support for its fight against the Kurds.

The Kurdish Workers’ Party, known as the PKK, was locked in a bloody war with the Turkish state from the mid-1980s until 2013. The cease-fire has, for all intents and purposes, been destroyed. Turkey is battling both ISIS and the PKK under the guise of fighting terrorism. Yet Turkish attempts to conflate ISIS and the PKK–even in the wake of the suicide bombing in a Kurdish border town that killed 32 young people–effectively ask people to overlook some salient facts:

The Kurds are Islamic State’s ideological opposites. The Kurds have been fighting ISIS in Syria and Iraq for some time; in particular, the Kurdish People’s Protection Unit (YPG) in northern Syria has been among the most effective forces at repelling ISIS efforts to take control of the Syrian-Turkish border. Kurdish military resistance in Syria and, to a lesser extent, the Kurdish autonomous government in Iraq have shouldered the lion’s share of the ground conflict against Islamic State, standing their ground at high cost and with limited support from the Western coalition.


A declaration of a state of emergency in Turkey would give the Justice and Development Party (or AKP), which lost its parliamentary majority in June elections, more flexibility to crack down on political opponents such as the Kurdish majority People’s Democratic Party. More than 1,300 people have been detained recently under the guise of cracking down on domestic PKK and ISIS elements in Turkey.

The AKP has declared the peace process with the Kurdish separatists dead and is trying to discredit the only recognized political representatives of the Turkish left and the Kurdish population; the Kurdish People’s Democratic Party won a 13% share of the Turkish parliament in the June elections–a sign of its rising popularity not only among Kurds but also with increasingly disgruntled Turkish liberals.


If a governing coalition isn’t formed, early elections will be held. The AKP appears to be hoping for that–under the thinking that a majority of voters would seek to maintain the status quo in a time of uncertainty and potential civil war, and that AKP’s standing in parliament would, in turn, be strengthened.

Zero Hedge adds:

Even the most mainstream of news outlets are unable to completely obscure the fact that Turkey’s ISIS “offensive” may amount to nothing more than a smokescreen, as Erdogan launches a renewed effort to crush the PKK and nullify opposition gains won at the ballot box early last month when, for the first time in more than a decade, AKP [Erdogan’s party] lost its parliamentary majority.

Coalition building efforts since the election have gone largely nowhere, and in what amounted to a sure sign that some manner of crackdown was likely just around the corner, Erdogan warned on June 21 that “if politicians are unable to sort [it] out, then the people are the only recourse” – a nod to his right under the constitution to call new elections.

Critically, AKP doesn’t need much to push them back over the top in terms of regaining their majority in parliament. Consider the following from WSJ:

Turkey’s government—which lost its parliamentary majority last month— bills its new two-front war against Kurdish militants and Islamic State as a much-overdue reaction to terrorism. But, on the third front of domestic politics, this violence could also help President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his party regain control.

In the June 7 parliamentary elections, Mr. Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party, or AKP, lost its majority for the first time in 12 years, and has been in coalition talks since. If these negotiations fail in coming weeks, Mr. Erdogan has said he will send the country back to the polls.

A rise in nationalist feelings amid the bloodshed and an unfolding crackdown on the government’s Kurdish political foes could bolster AKP’s chances in such a new election, many analysts say.

A two-percentage point shift from the last election could restore AKP’s absolute majority, making concessions demanded by its potential coalition partners on press freedom, corruption prosecutions and foreign policy unnecessary. This could also allow Mr. Erdogan to proceed with controversial plans to turn Turkey into a presidential republic and solidify his personal power.

The last passage there is critical.

AKP needs but a two percentage point swing in order to pave the way for Erdogan’s power grab and there’s no better way to stoke a renewed sense of nationalism and turn voters away from HDP than to invent a conflict and then trot out a few casualities as proof of what can happen when Kurdish “terrorists” are emboldened by a victory at the ballot box.

Given this, one could be forgiven for casting a wary eye at the rather convenient series of events that has now culminated in Ankara going back to war with the PKK. Here’s a recap:

NATO representatives met in Brussels on Tuesday after Turkey made a rare Article 4 request which compels treaty parties to convene in the event a member state is of the opinion that its “territorial integrity, political independence or security” is being threatened. 

That’s the case in Turkey, where the security situation has rapidly deteriorated over the past two weeks following a suicide bombing in Suruc (claimed by Islamic State) and the murder of two Turkish policemen in the town of Ceylanpinar (at the hands of the PKK, which claims the officers were cooperating with ISIS). Ankara responded by launching airstrikes against both Islamic State and PKK.

So, ISIS launches a suicide attack and the PKK (whose Syrian affiliate YPG is battling ISIS just across the border) retaliates by killing two Turkish policemen, an event which gives the government an excuse to tighten the screws on the Kurds with virtual impunity under the guise of stepping up its efforts against ISIS.

Better still, the ISIS red herring has allowed Ankara to effectively obtain NATO’s blessing for a brutal crackdown on its Kurdish political rivals. To wit, from Salon:

The choreography attaching to the accord authorizing Turkey’s entry into war as a combatant is, as often, so careful and predictable as to be self-evident. On Sunday Ankara announced that it had requested a meeting of NATO ambassadors to consider its new circumstance. The outcome was obvious from the first.

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO’s Norwegian secretary-general, suggested Monday that Turkey was unlikely to get “any substantial NATO military support.”

This was a straw man: Material support is not what the Erdogan government wants. In its fight against ISIS and the Kurds—against both, note—it wants “solidarity and support from our NATO allies,” as the foreign ministry in Ankara later made clear.

Legitimacy, in other words. And it got it Tuesday in Brussels, where Stoltenberg announced, “We all stand united in condemning terrorism, in solidarity with Turkey.”  See the problem? Not “united against ISIS,” but “united in condemning terrorism.”

Erdogan understood. Within hours he declared that no peace process with the Kurds is possible—and then urged parliament to strip legislators with ties to the PKK of immunity from prosecution. An Istanbul source wrote Tuesday afternoon to say that some sitting parliamentarians have already been arrested.

So there you have it – mission accomplished. Erdogan has now secured Western support for his effort to nullify an election result he did not like.


Consider the following from Al Jazeera:

“When AK party lost [its] absolute majority [in parliament] on June 7, while HDP won, getting over the 10 percent barrier, the results showed how people started seeing that not every Kurd is a terrorist,”  Ilya U Topper, an Istanbul-based analyst on foreign affairs and democracy for the M’Sur, a Spanish media outlet added.

He noted that HDP was able to perform so well in June’s elections because there was peace.

“Two years of peace make people forget bloodshed and give them hope. Now we are back to square one. Kurds are ‘terrorists’ again,” he said. “If elections are repeated, HDP might fall under the barrier and AK party will achieve [an] absolute majority in the elections. The big question is why the PKK accepted that game.”

And that is a very good question.

Why would the PKK, whose political affiliate had just won a major victory at the ballot box, suddenly decide that now is the time to break a fragile cease fire, likely knowing that doing so would imperil further political gains and legitimacy for HDP?


In the final analysis, Turkey wants Assad out of Syria and that means backing anyone and everyone who is willing to help make that happen (including ISIS) with the exception of the PKK, who Ankara is keen on crushing especially after June’s election results. So now, Turkey will use ISIS as an excuse to procure NATO support for a politically motivated rout of Kurdish “terrorists”. The West will hope that ISIS will suffer more damage than YPG, Turkey will hope that PKK and, by extension, YPG will suffer more damage than ISIS, and everyone – Ankara, Washington, ISIS, and PKK – will hope the when the dust (and blood) finally settles, Bashar al-Assad will have met a Gaddafi-esque end.

So Turkey isn’t really going after ISIS … instead, the ruling party is going after its main political threat – the Kurds – and continuing its long-term effort to overthrow Syria’s Assad.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • berger friedrich-wolfgang

    ERDOGAN is just a Modern-Day Syncretistic Islamic JEW ; as were the “Young TURKS” of “ATATÜRK” ! Article , Revealing “The Hidden TRUTH of Modern Day TURKEY” on “” !!!

  • Jan 28, 2015 Suspected ISIS leader in Pakistan admits receiving funds via US report

    A suspected Islamic State operative in Pakistan, Yousaf al Salafi, confesses to recruiting jihadists to fight in Syria, and says he received funds, wired through the U.S. RT’s Gayane Chichakyan reports.

    May 27, 2015 To beat ISIS, kick out US-led coalition

    The multinational, American-led ‘Coalition’ launched last August to thwart Islamic State’s (IS, formerly ISIS) march across Syria and Iraq…did nothing. And so Baghdad and Washington are pointing fingers, each accusing the other of being asleep on the job. US Defense Secretary Ash Carter struck a low blow on Sunday in a CNN interview: “What apparently happened was that the Iraqi forces just showed no will to fight. They vastly outnumbered the opposing force. That says to me… that we have an issue with the will of the Iraqis to fight and defend themselves.”

  • Libertybelle

    While i genuinely appreciate the tenor and thrust of this article, nonetheless, I will wait for leftists on this board to start whining and demanding that Turkey return Constantinople to the Christians. You know, like how they whine about returning territory to the Palestinians.

    I will wait for lefties to whine on endlessly about Imperial Islam–the largest growing political hegemony on earth and one that has wrenched huge swaths of the earth from humanity against the will of their peoples. You know, like how they whine about Israel. (Or even whined about the British Empire or imperialism in general.) Or the American Indians for that matter.

    Imperial Islam gets a pass even as she swallows up one region after another. Maybe the “sanctified” sex with little girls practiced by Islam since day one of its founding is what gets them excited? Can they hate America that much that they will ignore that too? Are they so obsessed with the money other people have (and hate them for it) that they will overlook it?

    It seems they do. They will rejoice in the ruination of the Dugger family (the majority of whom are innocent) as they nonchalantly watch a degenerate religion embedded with a polity swarms all over the planet.

    You would think a cursory glance of the world map or globe might give them a clue as to who is the prime world aggressor today: Imperial Islam that swallows up much of the world.

    The problem is not tiny, itty bitty, Israel nor the nearly extinct Jew. Without question, this does not justify the lawlessness and criminality of usurpatious American government in the Middle East since the 1950s. But that lawlessness began long before 1947.

    Nevertheless, you just cannot make up crazed fictional stories about how stupid and evil left wingers when reality is so convincing. People have tried. Lefties are obsessed with “imperialists” who are businessmen and like to have nice houses, neighborhoods, and orderly lives so they can have a nice life (the evil corrupt ones noted). They even like porn, booze, and a bunch of unholy stuff. But when it comes to Imperial Islam with its subjugation of everything under it, its totalitarianism, its mind-numbing conformity, its brainwashing, its brutality, and its oppression and slavery of women–they don’t flinch. Islam has produced virtually nothing, culturally, for the past 1400 years. No matter. The left defends it.

    It appears that the commies get along very well with that. This likely explains the limp-wristed (but illegal) response by Obama in the Middle East. He is picking the blossom petals off the Middle East daisy like a little boy does when he repeats “She loves me, she loves me not (kaboom)”.

    I will wait for the left to demand Imperial Islam should return lands to the Christians all over the Middle East or the Hindus in Bangladesh. I will wait for the left to demand and end of Islamic imperial aggression currently in the Phillipines. I will wait for them to exercise moral consistency across the globe like they expect of others.

    But I won’t hold my breath. Moral consistency is not be found amongst them.

    They are mostly obsessed with Israel. Or businessmen. They prefer to rant on forever against the civilization that has produced much of the world’s greatest art, science, literature, and music: western civilization. Thus they prove that they are not genuinely angry with injustice. They strain at the Israeli gnats while they swallow the Imperial Islamic camels who continue to trample vast corners of the planet. Tiny Israel sits on a speck of earth while Imperial Islam has swallowed and continues to swallow up vast territories against the will of nearly all the peoples who suffer under its oppression.

    Just ask the Persians of Iran and their Kurdish cousins.

    It all starts with Mohammad. You cannot even blame the evil and wicked (and truly it is) CIA for him. He was a violent, money grubbing, imperialist leader of an army who traded in female sex slaves and was a serial rapist. In comparison to the left’s criticism of Jews and Israel they are mostly silent about Mohammad and his billion or so followers.

    The leftist should take no sides in this fight if they wish to be honorable and consistent. Then let the course of history flow as each peoples determines for themselves if they shall and can make themselves into a nation. Whether they be Kurds, Jews, or the pathetic leftists.

    • colinjames71

      Hey what’s the weather like in bizzaro world?

      • berger friedrich-wolfgang

        Not So hot , as in your “HELL-HOLE” !!!

    • truthtime

      Just a troll seeking bait, move along. How’s the weather at Langley?

      Radical Islamic-ism has nothing to do with being a Muslim. It is radical form that has been directly fostered and enabled by the West.

      And lest we forget that pamphlets/books were created in the U.S., during the time the U.S. gave money/weapons to terror folks in Afghanistan. Those books were given to groups like the Taliban, which found their way into the Afghani school system and the content literally espoused extremism and bolstered it through those radical pamphlets with pictures of violence and militant teachings.

      • Libertybelle

        You cannot erase 1400 years of Muslim scholarship that confirms Mohammad is the radical founder of a vile and violent imperial religion. And those who do and promote the same are holy in the eyes of that faith.

        Uh, and the CIA is run by a Muslim. So Langley is backing YOU before it would be backing me.. Sheesh, babies whine about trolls. Usually because they don’t have the intelligence to confront the issues or ignore comments they don’t like.

      • Baz

        They do if they don’t condemn the so called ‘radicals’. Condoning an action, through in action or moral support still means that you are in support of that sort of action. How big a group do the radicals need to comprise before they represent Muslims? 5%? 10% ?25%? 50%? 99%? If any religion has even a 1% rate of extremists then it undoubtedly has something to do with it, think about it 1% of a billion is 10 million people. Any true religion that want people to believe that it represents peace, must have less than 0.01% of their believers being violent extremists who are literally willing to kill for their faith.

        Its not a matter of opinion its a simple matter of statistics, and poring events that have happened in the past, your ‘no true Scotsman’ fallacy is not going to cut it here I’m afraid.

        Just to reiterate, I am not condemning your religion as a whole, simply it current status with its affiliation with violence, intolerance ( of differing beliefs, differing sexual preferences, different cultures, and human life in general), illiberal hegemonies based upon it, and the desire to convert the west into another puppet of the Islamic hegemony. Other religions have gone through this before, so it would be unfair to damn Islam just for these.

        However change does need to occur, if there is any chance of advancing the cause of the human race, not from without, but from within Islam itself. The first step to realising that there is something wrong. Stop covering your own eyes by trying to convince everyone that the ‘extremists’ are some rare fluke. They are TOO common and the tacit support of them by the ‘moderate’ Muslims is TOO obvious for this shit to float. I hope this breaks you out of your delusions somewhat, although I doubt this will happen.

    • berger friedrich-wolfgang

      I too !

  • May 25, 2015 America Admittedly Behind ISIS “Surge”

    Taking advantage of a Syrian military stretched thin to protect everywhere at the same time, high concentrations of well-coordinated Al Qaeda forces, based in NATO-member Turkey as well as in US-allies Jordan and Saudi Arabia, have attacked across several fronts.