Ukraine and the Apocalyptic Risk of Propagandized Ignorance

I’m not sure if there’s been a better written book published yet this year than Ukraine: Zbig’s Grand Chessboard and How the West Was Checkmated, but I’m confident there’s not been a more important one. With some 17,000 nuclear bombs in the world, the United States and Russia have about 16,000 of them. The United States is aggressively flirting with World War III, the people of the United States have not the foggiest notion of how or why, and authors Natylie Baldwin and Kermit Heartsong explain it all quite clearly. Go ahead and tell me there’s nothing you’re now spending your time on that’s less important than this.

This book may very well be the best written one I’ve read this year. It puts all the relevant facts — those I knew and many I didn’t — together concisely and with perfect organization. It does it with an informed worldview. It leaves me nothing to complain about at all, which is almost unheard of in my book reviews. I find it refreshing to encounter writers so well-informed who also grasp the significance of their information.

Nearly half the book is used to set the context for recent events in Ukraine. It’s useful to understand the end of the cold war, the irrational hatred of Russia that pervades elite U.S. thinking, and the patterns of behavior that are replaying themselves now at higher volume. Stirring up fanatical fighters in Afghanistan and Chechnya and Georgia, and targeting Ukraine for similar use: this is a context CNN won’t provide. The partnership of the neocons (in arming and provoking violence in Libya) with the humanitarian warriors (in riding to the rescue for regime change): this is a precedent and a model that NPR won’t mention. The U.S. promise not to expand NATO, the U.S. expansion of NATO to 12 new countries right up to the border of Russia, the U.S. withdrawal from the ABM Treaty and pursuit of “missile defense” — this is background that Fox News would never deem significant. U.S. support for the rule of criminal oligarchs willing to sell off Russian resources, and Russian resistance to those schemes — such accounts are almost incomprehensible if you’ve consumed too much U.S. “news,” but are explained and documented well by Baldwin and Heartsong.

This book includes excellent background on the use and abuse of Gene Sharp and the color revolutions instigated by the U.S. government. A silver lining may be found, I think, in the value of nonviolent action recognized by all involved — whether for good or ill. The same lesson can be found (for good this time) in the civilian resistance to Ukrainian troops in the spring of 2014, and the refusal of (some) troops to attack civilians.

The Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2004, the Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003, and Ukraine II in 2013-2014 are recounted well, including detailed chronology. It’s truly remarkable how much has been publicly reported that remains buried. Western leaders met repeatedly in 2012 and 2013 to plot the fate of Ukraine. Neo-Nazis from Ukraine were sent to Poland to train for a coup. NGOs operating out of the U.S. Embassy in Kiev organized trainings for coup participants. On November 24, 2013, three days after Ukraine refused an IMF deal, including refusing to sever ties to Russia, protesters in Kiev began to clash with police. The protesters used violence, destroying buildings and monuments, and tossing Molotov cocktails, but President Obama warned the Ukrainian government not to respond with force. (Contrast that with the treatment of the Occupy movement, or the shooting on Capitol Hill of the woman who made an unacceptable U-turn in her car with her baby.)

U.S.-funded groups organized a Ukrainian opposition, funded a new TV channel, and promoted regime change. The U.S. State Department spent some $5 billion. The U.S. Assistant Secretary of State who handpicked the new leaders, openly brought cookies to protesters. When those protesters violently overthrew the government in February 2014, the United States immediately declared the coup government legitimate. That new government banned major political parties, and attacked, tortured, and murdered their members. The new government included neo-Nazis and would soon include officials imported from the United States. The new government banned the Russian language — the first language of many Ukrainian citizens. Russian war memorials were destroyed. Russian-speaking populations were attacked and murdered.

Crimea, an autonomous region of Ukraine, had its own parliament, had been part of Russia from 1783 until 1954, had publicly voted for close ties to Russia in 1991, 1994, and 2008, and its parliament had voted to rejoin Russia in 2008. On March 16, 2014, 82% of Crimeans took part in a referendum, and 96% of them voted to rejoin Russia. This nonviolent, bloodless, democratic, and legal action, in no violation of a Ukrainian constitution that had been shredded by a violent coup, was immediately denounced in the West as a Russian “invasion” of Crimea.

Novorossiyans, too, sought independence and were attacked by the new Ukrainian military the day after John Brennan visited Kiev and ordered that crime. I know that the Fairfax County Police who have kept me and my friends away from John Brennan’s house in Virginia have had no clue what hell he was unleashing on helpless people thousands of miles away. But that ignorance is at least as disturbing as informed malice would be. Civilians were attacked by jets and helicopters for months in the worst killing in Europe since World War II. Russian President Putin repeatedly pressed for peace, a ceasefire, negotiations. A ceasefire finally came on September 5, 2014.

Remarkably, contrary to what we’ve all been told, Russia didn’t invade Ukraine any of the numerous times we were told that it had just done so. We’ve graduated from mythical weapons of mass destruction, through mythical threats to Libyan civilians, and false accusation of chemical weapons use in Syria, to false accusations of launching invasions that were never launched. The “evidence” of the invasion(s) was carefully left devoid of location or any verifiable detail, but has all been decidedly debunked anyway.

The downing of the MH17 airplane was blamed on Russia with no evidence. The U.S. has information on what happened but won’t release it. Russia released what it had, and the evidence, in agreement with eye-witnesses on the ground, and in agreement with an air-traffic controller at the time, is that the plane was shot down by one or more other planes. “Evidence” that Russia shot the plane down with a missile has been exposed as sloppy forgeries. The vapor trail that a missile would have left was reported by not a single witness.

Baldwin and Heartsong close with the case that U.S. actions have backfired, that in fact whether the people of the United States have any idea what is going on or not, the power brokers in Washington have Second Amendmented themselves in the foot. Sanctions against Russia have made Putin as popular at home as George W. Bush was after he’d managed to exist as president while planes were flown into the World Trade Center. The same sanctions have strengthened Russia by turning it toward its own production and toward alliances with non-Western nations. Ukraine has suffered, and Europe suffers from a cut-off of Russian gas, while Russia makes deals with Turkey, Iran, and China. Evicting a Russian base from Crimea seems more hopeless now than before this madness began. Russia is leading the way as more nations abandon the U.S. dollar. Retaliatory sanctions from Russia are hurting the West. Far from isolated, Russia is working with the BRICS nations, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and other alliances. Far from impoverished, Russia is buying up gold while the U.S. sinks into debt and is increasingly viewed by the world as a rogue player, and resented by Europe for depriving Europe of Russian trade.

This story begins in the irrationality of collective trauma coming out of the holocaust of World War II and of blind hatred for Russia. It must end with the same irrationality. If U.S. desperation leads to war with Russia in Ukraine or elsewhere along the Russian border where NATO is engaging in various war games and exercises, there may be no more human stories ever told or heard.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • whitewashed in washington

    good article!

    • cettel

      It might have been a good article if it had opened by stating the authors and title of the book that’s being reviewed. That information was instead buried in it — and the names of the two authors were buried near the very end, so this review was unprofessional.

      In order to assist the sales of a book that the author evidently wants to assist, a link to a site where it can be acquired is also helpful to readers, and to the authors and publishers, but Swanson didn’t provide that, either.

      As to the content of the review, Swanson provides no basis upon which an uninformed reader can evaluate the book. Although I write much about the things that are mentioned in this review, and I have reported these same things in my news reporting for over a year, I shall need to look at the book itself in order to find out how well organized it is, and the quality of the sources that it is based upon.

      All that I know from this review is that the book seems to fit the history as I have reported it to be. The review of it by Swanson is poor, but at least it informed me of the existence of a book that I might possibly want to buy. In that sense, a poor, and even unprofessional, review, is better than none at all.

      • Harlan County

        I’m just glad that attention, any attention is being directed to this book. Natylie Baldwin is out here in the figurative trenches with the rest of us, posting as a Disqus user, and writing articles, I have followed her on Disqus and will be purchasing the book.
        I’m not exactly picky at this point, just happy to have anybody raise up there voice and speak truth to power. I even applaud Mr. Swansons review, and I will favorite this discussion.

  • Man on the street

    The transformation of the American people to robots obeing the PC commands and narratives propaganda of our media made it safe to do what our leaders want without worrying about exposures or paybacks.

  • Southern

    What it comes down to is that the independent media is kicking MSM’s arse.

    MSM journalism & mouth pieces have proven too eager to accept governments press releases as fact, when they should be skeptical and investigate to see if the information supplied holds truth.

    Like the case of the Malaysian passenger plane, by immediately pointing the bone at Russia while failing to provide solid and verifiable evidence, the MSM proves once more to be the willing mouthpiece for Neo-Con propaganda.

    The plane would have been perfectly visible to satellites – 1) It was still daylight and 2) she was flying above cloud cover – yet this information collected by satellites has not been released, just like it was not clear exactly what hit the pentagon, I’ve seen the before and after pictures – they did not make sense.

    I’d like to suggest that all teleprompters be banned, replaced by journalist able to prepare and present their own work, O wait that’ll never happen.

  • alteredz

    It’s pretty incredible that one would believe some of this. It’s difficult to substantiate anything that is out there on the Internet about the Ukraine situation. There are probably several questionable claims in this opinion piece, but to believe and obviously not check on the validity of the Russian language being banned in Ukraine is beyond irresponsible. This isn’t journalism on any level. It’s an opinion piece with many of the typical propaganda methods being used to try to sway the reader.

    I really can’t take any of the rest of this article – or the book that it is ADVERTISING – as true or false.

    The Russian language is NOT banned in Ukraine. Many people freely speak Russian there. I know this from first hand experience.

    The other issue is that I do not understand why people would be against the Ukraine having their borders respected. Putin is using the arguments used by Hitler when he invaded Czechoslovakia at the beginning of WWII. It was not a valid reason to invade a country then, and it isn’t now. None of the rest of the arguments really matter – how would you like your country’s borders invaded because a neighboring nation wanted to “protect” speakers of your language?