U.S. to Start Training Nazi Troops in Ukraine, on April 20th, Hitler’s Birthday

Eric Zuesse

It has just been announced that, on April 20th (Hitler’s birthday), U.S. troops will start training troops of Ukraine’s nazi Azov Battalion. 

The Azov Battalion was founded and its members were selected by Andrei Biletsky, a Ukrainian nazi (that’s an ideological term, meaning racist fascist — not a term referring specifically to the first political party with that particular ideology, the National Socialist Party of Germany). When Britain’s Guardian interviewed members, the reporter was shocked to find that they’re nazis (“neo-Nazis”).

Biletsky proudly explains his ideology as follows:

“Social Nationalism is based on a number of fundamental principles that clearly distinguish it from other right-wing movements. This triad is: socialism, racism, imperialism. … On the principle of socialism [in the sense that Hitler used it] follows our complete negation of democracy and liberalism. … Instead there is natural selection of the best representatives of the Nation — born-leaders as Ukraine’s leaders. … Racism: All our nationalism is nothing — just a castle in the sand — without reliance on the foundationstone of blood Races. … 

“The historic mission of our Nation, a watershed in this century, is thus to lead the White peoples of the world in the final crusade for their survival. It is to lead the war against Semites and the sub-humans they use.  … Social Nationalism raises to shield all old Ukrainian Aryan values, forgotten in modern society.”

Biletsky founded the Azov Battalion soon after Obama’s February 2014 coup in Kiev, which was led by Andriy Parubiy, who had co-founded the Social Nationalist Party of Ukraine. Parubiy’s masked men in the coup dressed as if they were Ukrainian security forces, and fired onto demonstrators during the Maidan demonstrations against Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych. They were paid by the CIA at the U.S. Embassy, and they included both foreign mercenaries and troops who had been trained by Dmitriy Yarosh, who had founded another of Ukraine’s nazi parties, this one called Right Sector. Most of the coup’s perpetrators were members of Right Sector, which, in addition to being a party, has an estimated 7,000 troops of its own, who were trained under Yarosh’s command.

The Azov Battalion was established on 13 April 2014 by the newly appointed post-coup Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs, Arsen Avakov, who had been appointed by the interim Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov, who had been appointed by the person anointed (nominally temporarily but actually) permanently as Ukraine’s Prime Minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, whose anointment came from the U.S. Ambassador Jeffrey Pyatt, after Obama’s agent Victoria Nuland had instructed him on 4 February 2014, just 18 days before the coup, to do that. 

So, this overthrow was well planned in advance. In fact, it had even been arranged prior to its alleged precipitating-event, which was Yanukovych’s having announced on 20 November 2013 that he was turning down the EU’s offer to Ukraine. Yanukovych turned it down because his advisors calculated that it would cost Ukraine $160 billion.

Apparently, the Obama regime had already known, ahead of time, that it would cost Ukraine so much that Yanukovych would have to reject it. And his saying no to it turned out to be a popular political move. Public sentiment in Ukraine on whether the nation was heading in the “right direction” or the “wrong direction” boomed just after the decision: the “right direction” score, which was at a nearly two-year low of only 15.4% just a month before the decision’s announcement (which was the period when it seemed likeliest that Ukraine was heading into the EU), shot up to a nearly four-year high of 26.1% just a month after the announcement and while the U.S.-engineered “Maidan” demonstrations against Yanukovych were raging against Yanukovych. But, Obama didn’t really care at all about Ukrainian public opinion. He already had the support of Ukraine’s nazis, and that’s all he actually needed.

So: now he is expressing his appreciation, by providing America’s best military training, to Ukraine’s best nazi troops.

Going back again to that coup, in order the better to understand this history: Nuland had probably been informed ahead of time, by the lawyer for Yulia Tymoshenko — she was the founder of the third nazi party of Ukraine, which is called “Fatherland” — that Tymoshenko (in prison at the time, on a corruption conviction) said that Yatsenyuk was her most loyal lieutenant and was the person who would be the most cooperative in relinquishing power to her if and when Tymoshenko would be released from prison immediately after the planned coup and after she would then run for the Presidency and win it. She was expected to win, because she had come in a close second to Yanukovych in the last, the 2010, Presidential election, and especially because she was expected to be even more popular after a coup in which the man who had gotten her convicted, Yanukovych, would himself now have been framed by the Obama regime for the violence that the U.S. had planned in order to bring him down.

Yatsenyuk, Turchynov, and Avakov, were all members of Tymoshenko’s Fatherland Party; and, so, the entire security apparatus of the new, post-coup, state was under Tymoshenko’s control, from the very moment of the coup — which was why she was freed from prison by them on the very day of the coup.

But Tymoshenko, during her Presidential campaign, overplayed her hand: She got taped in a private phone-conversation during the campaign, saying (as this documentary excerpted and is transcribed here, and which was an accurate reflection of what she had said at the time):

1:21:08 Obama’s failed choice to become the new Ukrainian President, Yulia Tymoshenko, is on the phone: “Damn, we’ve got to arm up and go kill these damn kitsaps [their term like for ‘niggers’ or ‘kikes’ but actually here for Russians].” [Question: “What do we do with eight million Russians who are left on the territory of Ukraine?” Tymoshenko’s answer:] … We[‘ve] got to shoot them.”

She wanted to eliminate the voters who had elected Yanukovych, and who were now rejecting the coup-regime, which she was expecting to lead. That’s the type of person, an extreme hater of pro-Russians, whom Obama wanted to be elected by Ukrainians as their President, and for whom the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine had tirelessly tried to get freed from prison — unsuccessfully, until they got Yanukovych overthrown by Tymoshenko’s fellow rabidly anti-Russian nazis, such as the ones whom Obama’s troops will now be training to kill all of the pro-Russians they possibly can. Even the right-wing voters of northwestern Ukraine found her to be too far-right.

Obama had pretended, until he got re-elected in 2012, that he opposed Mitt Romney’s idea that, concerning, “Russia, this is, without question, our number one geopolitical foe.”

And, so, in Obama’s second Administration, he put in place such people as Victoria Nuland, Jeffrey Pyatt, John Brennan, and Philip Breedlove — all rabid haters of Russians — in order to focus all of America’s foreign-policy efforts against “our number one geopolitical foe” and against all of its allies: the heads of state in primarily Russia but secondarily Libya, Syria, Iran, Venezuela, China, Brazil, India, Hungary, Czech Republic, and all other nations that oppose being ruled by the U.S. aristocracy, the American Empire.

However, Obama had been setting this up even during his first Administration. The hypothesis in Andrew Krieg’s Presidential Puppetry is that Obama has been secretly an agent of the CIA for decades, and was virtually raised in a CIA-and-U.S.-aristocracy-serving family, on both his mother’s and father’s sides — and that he’s probably the most deceiving President our nation has ever had.

In any case, the evidence thus far is that Obama prioritizes weakening Russia, even over weakening ISIS. And he was sufficiently obsessive about his war against Russia, for him to resort to getting the Ukrainian Government to shoot down the MH17 Malaysian airliner and to frame the pro-Russian separatists for doing it, just in order to be able to win the support of the EU for hiked sanctions against Russia. He is bending everything to his hatred of Russia. So, nobody should now be surprised that he is arming and training Ukrainian nazis for his anti-Russian war.

The question for the American people is whether they will tolerate this fraud? They tolerate, and tolerated, the fraud by his predecessor, that got America to invade Iraq in 2003. So, probably they will continue tolerating this fraud that can bring on World War III. But if not, then now is the time for the American people to change, which will require popular demonstrations far larger than those that were held against the Vietnam War. Because time, for the world, could well be running out, this time around.

Such phrases as this, probably sound like an extreme way to refer to what’s happening. But how extreme is it, actually, for the U.S. now to be training and arming nazi troops? And how extreme is it for the U.S. President to resort to shooting down a civilian airliner in order to turn the crank a bit more on economic sanctions against Russia — which are entirely based on frauds?

Will it stop in any way, short of WW III stopping all of us? How obtuse, and how unconcerned, and how deceived, are the American people? And what about the people in Europe — why aren’t they demanding their countries to abandon NATO, America’s anti-Russian military club, which should have ended in 1991, when the Soviet Union’s equivalent, the Warsaw Pact, terminated. Isn’t it enough that the U.S., alone, already has military forces stationed in 185 countries throughout the world? Maybe they should be kicked out, until that number is brought down to Russia’s number: 9. Maybe the nations of the world should be demanding this, and voting against the U.S. in every UN vote until it is achieved. Maybe that would do far more to advance and protect world peace than the UN itself currently does. Or, maybe, there should be international boycotts of all U.S.-based firms, until the U.S. Government (which represents those firms, no longer the American people) stops its proxy-wars against Russia.

Instead, America’s most-watched cable-news channel, Fox ‘News,’ interviews their ‘military expert,’ who tells America’s fascists and nazis — which are their audience (it’s called “the Republican Party”) — that America’s policy in Ukraine needs to harden, and that it must be this: “Start killing Russians” until Russia runs out of “body bags.” Imagine if Russia’s most popular ‘news’ medium were to say that the ‘solution’ to the ‘Cuba problem’ is to “Start killing Americans” until America runs out of “body bags.” Shouldn’t Obama have apologized to Russians for that? Shouldn’t he have expressed outrage at it that he did not express? Shouldn’t he have had his FCC investigate Fox ‘News’ Channel, and its controlling owner — the nazi Rupert Murdoch — perhaps to yank their licenses? Why do Americans tolerate such a President as this, one who instead eggs-on such hatred, by his using the word “aggression” 18 times in his “National Security Strategy 2015” and 17 of those times are referring to Russia? How insane is that? He even rubs it in, by saying, repeatedly in speeches, that the U.S. is “the one indispensable nation,” which means that every other nation (including, but not only, Russia) is “dispensable.” Hitler said virtually the same thing about Germany: “Deutschland über alles.” Obama is as similar to that, in his nationalistic outlook, as his good-cop bad-cop partner, Rupert Murdoch, is — and that’s why the yanking of Murdoch’s licenses isn’t even being looked into.

It’s no wonder, then, why the U.S. is considered, throughout the world, to be by far the most dangerous nation. But when it’s training nazis to fight Russians, isn’t it far too dangerous? How long will this outrage, today’s far-right America, continue to be tolerated — by the American people, and by other national governments? It should be isolated, and shunned, until it no longer is the world’s leading fascist nation.


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity, and of Feudalism, Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics.

This entry was posted in General, Politics / World News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • kimyo

    America’s fascists and nazis — which are their audience (it’s called “the Republican Party”)

    it is the argument of a child to call those who disagree with you ‘nazis’.

    i’m sure they exist, but i’ve never personally met a republican who deserves to be called a ‘fascist’ or a ‘nazi’.

    what percentage of republicans are fascists/nazis in your view? you are never going to contribute to a path forward if your primary form of ‘argument’ is name-calling.

    • cettel

      It’s no more “name-calling” than to say that someone is a “liberal,” or a “conservative,” or a “progressive,” or a “libertarian,” or a “fascist,” or a “communist” — or even to say that someone is a “Catholic,” or a “Jew,” or a “Shiite,” or a “Sunni,” or to use any other descriptor identifying a person’s beliefs.

      • kimyo

        roughly speaking, according to both gallup and pew, obama’s rating among members of the democratic party is 78%.

        by your ‘standards’ is it not appropriate to call these people ‘nazis’?

        i find it impossible to believe that when gw created this blog his/her intention was to create enmity between americans. (perhaps he/she’d like to step in and clarify?)

        let’s say a staunch republican who has started to consider the possibility that dubya/cheney are guilty of multiple war crimes happens upon w’s blog.

        if it’s a zuesse post he happens upon first, will he feel welcome?

        we need to focus on what we agree on. 80% of us agree that what we have is not working. i hope that soon, 80% of us will agree that voting for a cbs flash news-poll selected red or blue money-grubbing sub-human is not going to provide any sort of fix.

        • Southernfink

          Where did US sovereignty go?

          • cettel

            When we became fascist, only the aristocracy retain sovereignty here — the public have none.

          • Southernfink

            That’s just the thing about the US and her policies – she does not consider another nation to be a true democracy unless that nation privatizes their national assets.

          • kimyo

            it’s certainly not going to be found in the booth on the touch-screen.

          • Southernfink

            Electronic voting, recounts are impossible, while tampering is entirely possible.

            The consequences of the US foreign policy – not a single nation is immune.

            How can the US go round the world pretending to up hold the principles of democracy when she is not considered to be one herself?

            Yet the US does not consider another nation as a democracy unless that nation privatizes their government owned assets. more here

            Which they’ll buy with funds created out of nothing.

            US exceptionalism is on clear display – I believe the author makes a good point Is the U.S. a Fascist Society? Fascism is a Political Economic Structure Which Serves Corporate Interests

        • cettel

          Well, of course, the 78% of Democrats who still support Obama are either deceived (by the ‘news’ media) and so don’t know that he’s a nazi, or else they aren’t deceived by the ‘news’ media and they see through it (and him) to his very real nazism. I was of the latter category, which is why I quit the Party — his (and the majority of congressional Democrats’) being nazis made me recognize that I’m no Democrat, any longer. The Party has gone so far to the right that it’s now no longer clearly distinguishable from the Republicans.

          • nomadfiles

            Third possibility: (while I prefer the term “fascist”) they know it and don’t care. A subset of that: they know it, care, but go along anyway due to the philosophy of lesser-evilism. And will attack you if you don’t subscribe.

    • truth

      The entire “disbanded” group of PNAC (reformed as FDD) for starters. It may be news to you; but some of those old timers were taught under Leo Strauss and simply learned straight up Fascist ideology from him.


      If the label of ‘fascist’ is not to your liking; the “new-age” terms are Neo-Liberal and Neo-Conservative. Fascism, at its core, is the marriage of government and corporation; ideological nationalist “exceptionalism,” and Imperialism (exerting your influence by force).

      The major thing seems to be is that “Nazism” is of course associated in “recent” history with the likes of Hitler. While Hitler’s extreme Nazisms lost; fascism itself and its tendencies survived and have thrived since.

      • kimyo

        i have no problem describing hillary or romney as fascists, they’ve earned the title in spades.

        i do have a problem calling my republican neighbor a nazi, though.

        • Southernfink

          Bush grand father, a republican who acted as the Nazi’s banker.

          • kimyo

            preston = nazi banker, yes. dubya = gotta kill capitalism to ‘save’ it, yes. hillary = funded by ukrainian nazis, yes. obama = funding and nulanding the ukraine nazis, yes.

            my progressive and conservative acquaintances, NO. they may be (in equal measure) smart or dumb or lucky or not, but they’re not nazis or nazi sympathizers or fascists just because they happen to flip to fox news or msnbc or pbs or npr.

          • Southernfink

            Many neoconservatives like Paul Wolfowitz are disciples of a philosopher who believed that the elite should use deception, religious fervor and perpetual war to control the ignorant masses. Leo Strauss’ Philosophy of Deception

            More on Straus here

            However, the real issues are not being addressed – how much longer will the US continue bullying the rest of the world under the fallacious pretext of fighting a war on terror when all it’s really doing is carrying out the corporate agenda and making the rest of the world accountable to the financial elite.

            The entire global warfare is based on one lie after another, fitting the pattern of fascist rather well, false flag to boot.

          • Big Bear

            How much longer will Wall Street continue bullying and pillaging on all Americans to maintain and support their system of international bullying in pillage?

          • Southernfink

            Not just the US, but the rest of the world for that matter as they/we are the recipients of her foreign policy which is set by Wall $treet & the Pentagon

            In short and not to bore you, until all FTA’s are annulled and globalization has been reversed.

            On top of that there’s the matter of privately owned credit.

          • cettel

            “kimyo,” why do you ignore that whereas some Democrats are fascists, all Republicans are? Don’t you know the difference between “some” versus “all”?
            Notice: I didn’t say that all Republicans are “nazis.” That would imply that in addition to being fascists, they’re racists, which some of them aren’t. But, likewise, whereas some conservative Democrats are also racists, and are therefore nazis, others are merely conservatives, or “fascists.”
            It doesn’t make any difference what your Party-affiliation is: Obama is a nazi Democrat. Do you deny that?

          • kimyo

            ‘all republicans are fascists’ is not a statement you can support. (please do try to prove me wrong. all i have to do is produce 1 non-fascist republican.)

            you excuse democratic supporters of obama as being mal-informed by the msm and thus ‘not-guilty’ of being nazis. why does this logic not apply to republicans, equally mal-informed by the very same msm?

            it doesn’t matter if he is black or if his birth certificate is in order or if he’s a closet reagan fan. obama is a self-admitted war criminal, no other label or association matters. he must step down and be tried.

          • dadada

            As deranged as it all is maybe as a nation we need to wake up and realize anyone we put in office is going to try to do as they themselves see fit. That we have failed not only as a Nation and a Unity but we have let the convicts basically into the Government by our own elections.
            Our society has become the number one in Judgments of not only each other but of other Nations and did not God himself say Judge lest you be Judged.
            Well I guess this proved maybe it’s our turn to be Judged back and those of us who don’t deserve it suffer the consequences Just like any of Gods children had to do in past history. When will any of us learn that sometimes to gain peace silence is best?

        • cettel

          They’d have no problem voting for Hillary if her label were “Republican.”

          • kimyo

            many of my nazi (ie: democratic) neighbors are indeed planning to vote for hillary. apparently they missed your declaration that her candidacy is ‘effectively over’. i understand robert deniro has endorsed and that she’s signed a lease on campaign space in brooklyn.

          • Big Bear

            The only differences between “Republicans” and “Democrats” are superfial. On all key matters they are in total agreement. As the persistence of the rule of the 1% and Wall Street clearly shows.

        • Big Bear


        • tink

          republicans & democrats… funny. You can vote between one dumb ass or another, one man with corporate interest or.. the other… one representative of the GOVERNMENT or another. face face face, fairly superficial indeed my friends.

      • Big Bear

        At the first meeting of his Cabinet in 1933 FDR distributed to its members a copy each of the masterwork of Mussolini’s theorist of fascism, Giovanni Gentile. As FDR herded and tricked America into the Second World War, high level Wall Street corporate executives moved into ‘his’ Third Administration — and never left. The “Security State” that now administers American constitutional government is its child. This is fascism, by definition.

        • Bev

          Authoritarians, the extreme right/Fascists, only make up between 19-24% (with 1% of Authoritarians identifying as left/Totalitarians) of a greater population (80%-75%) who are more fair minded, democratically minded. This means that many Republicans are Fascists, but not all. Many Republicans are proud to have fought the Fascists in WWII. Propaganda that works on Republicans and others can get them lead down the wrong path. Also, since those e-voting, e-scanning, e-tabulating machines are in all primaries, too many Democrats are more right wing who have also been selected by the extreme right/Fascists who own and operate those machines. See: http://members.shaw.ca/jeanaltemeyer/drbob/TheAuthoritarians.pdf
          The Authoritarians by Dr Altemeyer

          So, Fascists Authoritarians having so few numbers need to lie, cheat, steal and worse in order to win power. When anonymously surveyed authoritarians self-describe as hierarchical, Machiavellian, aggressive, power seeking, amoral, and comfortable with inequity. They have to cheat in many different ways to overcome their small numbers and force their horrible, abusive leadership on others. See: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/seahawks-coach-pete-carroll-question-911.html

          Why Would Seahawks Coach Pete Carroll Question 9/11?
          Posted on February 1, 2015 by Kevin Ryan of http://digwithin.net/

          A Question: Dear Washingtonsblog, what do you make of the recent emergence of several sites co-opting the article on Seahawks Coach Pete Caroll Questioning 9/11? Sometimes these new sites are ahead of this article as ranked by google. Are these sites spreading the article around in case of internet censorship, or are they preempting, diluting and perhaps editing the article to supplant yours? And, it is not just that article, but others. Any info? The sites when googling Why Would Seahawks Coach Pete Carroll Question 9/11? are:

          The vital importance of the CODE RED Kickstarter campaign is illustrated by the outrageous failure of the mainstream media, law enforcement, and supposed experts from both major parties to probe electronic voting fraud. The media failures arise from self-censorship, cowardice and conflicts of interest, not from lack of evidence, and thus underscore especially the need for independent and non-partisan public education.
          -Andrew Kreig, author, “Presidential Puppetry”


          Get CODE RED, and spread the word about it, or give up any chance of salvaging US democracy!

          We Are Live on Kickstarter

          To stop election theft before it really is too late, we must come together and make our voices heard. CODE RED can play a major role in that but only if it is widely read. And that is where your support is so important.

          Our Kickstarter Campaign is live–spread the word please! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1805818671/computerized-election-theft-enough-already-lets-st

          Please donate. Every gift helps and encourages others to participate. If you cannot donate, you may know people who can–please reach out!

          We must reach our goal of $12,000 in 30 days to receive the funds and move forward with our work to educate the public about the very real dangers of secret vote counting on computerized equipment and mobilize our citizens to restore observable vote counting in America.

          Visit CodeRed2014.com to get banners to advertise the campaign on your blog! (if you need a different size, please ask!)

          Thank you for helping CODE RED get read!


          Computerized Election Theft and the New American Century
          Monday, 13 October 2014 00:00 By Jonathan D. Simon, Truthout

          Election Statistician http://richardcharnin.com/ Richard Charnin (Truth Is All)
          Election Fraud (1968-2012) Quantitative Analysis and True Vote Models

          In 2000, Al Gore won the 540,000 recorded votes (48.4-47.9%). But the
          unadjusted state exit polls (58,000 respondents) indicated he won by
          50.8-44.4%, a 6 million vote margin. There were nearly 6 million uncounted votes. The True Vote Model had him winning by 51.5-44.7%. But the Supreme Court awarded the election to Bush (271-267 EV). In Florida, 185,000 ballots were uncounted. The following states flipped from Gore in the exit poll to Bush in the recorded vote: AL AR AZ CO FL GA MO NC TN TX VA. Gore would have won the election if he captured just one of the states. Democracy died in this election. (Meaning Al Gore won all those states, including Texas)

          The bedrock of the evidence derives from this undisputed fact: Final national and state exit polls are always forced to match the recorded vote – even if doing so requires an impossible turnout of prior election voters and implausible vote shares. All demographic categories are adjusted to conform to the recorded vote. To use these forced final exit polls as the basis for election research is unscientific and irresponsible. The research is based on the bogus premise that the recorded vote is sacrosanct and represents how people actually voted. Nothing can be further from the truth.

          It is often stated that exit polls were very accurate in elections prior to 2004 but have deviated sharply from the recorded vote since. That is a misconception. The UNADJUSTED exit polls have ALWAYS been accurate and closely matched the True Vote in 1988-2008. A comparison of ADJUSTED, PUBLISHED exit polls in elections prior to 2004 and PRELIMINARY exit polls since then is like comparing apples to oranges. The adjusted, published exit polls have always exactly matched the fraudulent RECORDED vote because they have been forced to do so. That’s why they APPEAR to have been accurate. The RECORDED vote has deviated from the TRUE VOTE in EVERY election since 1968 –always favoring the Republicans.

          Here is some progress being made. Paper Ballots hand-counted in precinct on election night, still needs to occur.

          via: http://bradblog.com/?p=11048

          DNC Adopts Resolution Calling for ‘Right-to-Vote’ Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
          By Brad Friedman on 2/21/2015, 2:43pm PT
          [UPDATED to reflect the successful adoption of the resolution.]

          While Republican state legislatures around the nation have been working to limit access to the polls over recent years, Democrats moved a non-partisan initiative forward over the weekend to help expand — or, at least, to help protect — the franchise for all Americans.


          Lynn Landes
          The Case For Open Voting
          Democracy demands transparency, not trust -Sign up and be counted

          There is no transparency to our current voting system. Congress has legalized election fraud by allowing, if not mandating, non-transparent voting systems that prohibit direct access to a paper ballot and meaningful public oversight….

          Making matters worse, our public voting system has been privatized and outsourced to a handful of domestic, foreign, and multi-national corporations, most of whom have close ties to the right wing of the Republican Party. Just two companies, ES&S and Diebold, started by two brothers, Bob and Todd Urosevich, electronically process (using touchscreen machines or optical scanners), 80% of all votes. Their employees are in a perfect position to rig elections nation-wide. And evidence is mounting that elections in America have been computer programmed to prefer conservative candidates of both political parties. (those machines are in primaries so start there with real evidence)


          Who owns Scytl? George Soros isn’t in the voting machines, but the intelligence community is
          by Gerry Bello

  • This training and arming Ukraine might have more repercussions than the world would like.
    To beat a socialism you have to beat them at there own game. The country that holds the card’s
    in hand wins. Default just by folding country’s are doing by looking away.

  • Big Bear

    Wow, just how America was snookered into Vietnam — “we’ll just send advisors to help them learn to defend themselves against the Great Menace.” 58,222+ American and 2 million+ Vietnamese corpses later, “we” “withdrew.”

    Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize Winner, evidently doesn’t read history. Or is it that his “advisors” advise him to ignore it, along with the commandment that says Thou Shalt Not Kill?

    • Southernfink

      Obama does not kill personally – that’s the very thing that allows him the ”doublespeak” – it’s only on Tuesday’s – and even then – it’s his signature that outsources this hideous practice which completely contradicts the very principles associated with ”due process” – a subject that he himself taught, while employed as a lecturer.

  • Southernfink

    Don’t matter what day of the year it is – each day that passes is another firmly dedicated to globalization.

  • Axel


    An appearing great Article and many great informative excellent blog comment replies and within recent history. (I only partially read the Article and blog comment replies).

    I have again attached the above Article and from the resolves, efforts and endeavors and within recent history.

    I hope within my humble efforts and endeavors, remain that our National and International Executive, Legislative, Judicial entities and leaders and the Whistleblower Organizations Entities and Leaders and other Entities and Organizations will apply the proper and expected ‘Oversight and Accountability’ and to end the illegal and wrongful wars, renditions, Incarcerations………………….

    I wrote what I thought was an very good reply and I inadvertently and apparently did not save the Article as I tried to save my comment and verify the attachment. This is my effort to re-write my comment.

    • Axel

      Last sentence should have read ………. apparently did not save my comment as I tried to save my comment and verify ……..

  • Rehmat

    The Nazis have always friends of “Friends of Israel”. There were nearly 150 million German Jew among the Nazi Army, while some writers have called Adolf Hitler being a ‘Frankist Jew’. Jewish terrorist militia Irgun was allowed to have their training camps in Nazi Germany. Adolf Eichman, who visited British occupied Palestine along with his wife as guest of World Zionist movement helped German Jews to immigrate to Palestine.

    The Canadian-born Arab-hating Zionist author and blogger, Barry Chamish, in a 2014 article claimed that Zionism was created by Frankist Jews to destroy the Jews who follow Moses Law (Torah) instead of Jewish Talmud. Chamish lived in Israel for many years. However, in 1998 he left Israel for United States as result of death threats from Israel’s internal security service for accusing Shin Bet for murdering country’s prime minister Yitzhak Rabin in his book ‘Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin‘.

    “In 1933 less than 1% of the German Jews supported Zionism. Many tried to escape from Nazism by boat to Latin and North American ports but the international diplomatic order was to turn them back. Any German Jew who rejected Palestine as his shelter would be shipped back to his death,” says Chamish.


  • Vladek

    After aiding and arming ISIS, they now proceed with aiding neo-Nazis in Ukraine … Washington’s foreign policy is at its lowest moral points in history I think…and that says a lot!

  • Pentagon gone wild once more, and trillions of times and dollars wasted is just the norm!

    APRIL 5, 2015 The Pentagon’s $10-billion bet gone bad

    Trying to fashion a shield against a sneak missile attack, military planners gambled on costly projects that flopped, leaving a hole in U.S. homeland defense.


  • Bush/Nazi Link Continued from The New Hampshire Gazette Vol. 248, No. 3, November 7, 2003
    After the seizures in late 1942 of five U.S. enterprises he managed on behalf of Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, Prescott Bush, the grandfather of President George W. Bush, failed to divest himself of more than a dozen “enemy national” relationships that continued until as late as 1951, newly-discovered U.S. government documents reveal.


    The Washington Times – Friday, October 17, 2003 Bush bank tied to Nazi funding


    25 September 2004 George Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany. The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.


    • paradigmshft

      So…WHY would ANYONE vote for yet another Bush Nazi such as Jeb?

      • Bev

        Nazis do not have the numbers to ever win elections.

        See statistician: http://richardcharnin.com/ Richard Charnin (Truth Is All)

        In the 1968-2012 Presidential elections, the Republicans won the average recorded vote by 48.7-45.8%. The 1968-2012 Recursive National True Vote Model indicates the Democrats won the True Vote by 49.6-45.0% – a 7.5% margin discrepancy.

        In the 1988-2008 elections, the Democrats won the unadjusted state exit poll aggregate by 52-42% – but won the recorded vote by just 48-46%, an 8% margin discrepancy. The state exit poll margin of error was exceeded in 126 of 274 state presidential elections from 1988-2008. The probability of the occurrence is ZERO. Only 14 (5%) would be expected to exceed the MoE at the 95% confidence level. Of the 126 which exceeded the MoE, 123 red-shifted to the Republican. The probability P of that anomaly is ABSOLUTE ZERO (5E-106). That is scientific notation for

        P= .000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 000005.

        The proof is in the 1988-2008 Unadjusted State Exit Polls Statistical Reference. Not one political scientist, pollster, statistician, mathematician or media pundit has ever rebutted the data or the calculation itself. They have chosen not to discuss the topic. And who can blame them? Job security is everything.

        Election forecasters, academics, political scientists and main stream media pundits never discuss or analyze the statistical evidence that proves election fraud is systemic – beyond a reasonable doubt. This site contains a compilation of presidential, congressional and senate election analyses based on pre-election polls, unadjusted exit polls and associated True Vote Models. Those who never discuss or analyze Election Fraud should focus on the factual statistical data and run the models. If anyone wants to refute the analytical evidence, they are encouraged to do so in a response. Election forecasters, academics and political scientists are welcome to peer review the content.

        The bedrock of the evidence derives from this undisputed fact: Final national and state exit polls are always forced to match the recorded vote – even if doing so requires an impossible turnout of prior election voters and implausible vote shares. All demographic categories are adjusted to conform to the recorded vote. To use these forced final exit polls as the basis for election research is unscientific and irresponsible. The research is based on the bogus premise that the recorded vote is sacrosanct and represents how people actually voted. Nothing can be further from the truth.

        It is often stated that exit polls were very accurate in elections prior to 2004 but have deviated sharply from the recorded vote since. That is a misconception. The UNADJUSTED exit polls have ALWAYS been accurate and closely matched the True Vote in 1988-2008. A comparison of ADJUSTED, PUBLISHED exit polls in elections prior to 2004 and PRELIMINARY exit polls since then is like comparing apples to oranges. The adjusted, published exit polls have always exactly matched the fraudulent RECORDED vote because they have been forced to do so. That’s why they APPEAR to have been accurate. The RECORDED vote has deviated from the TRUE VOTE in EVERY election since 1968 – always favoring the Republicans

      • Keith Charles Cannon
        • paradigmshft

          Thanks, saved it to bookmarks. I have been very aware of PNAC, since I’ve been studying 9/11/01 since 2004. Bush and Cheney cannot travel to several countries because upon arrival, they would be arrested for crimes against humanity. Unfortunately, the USA lets their criminals write books and make lots of money speaking to Zionists.

    • Keith Charles Cannon

      What’s brown and smells like a Jew’s asshole? Give up? George Bush’s nose! http://uncle-semite.com/wejissue/

  • Keith Charles Cannon