HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM

Agent In Charge of Amerithrax Investigation Blows the Whistle

The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation – Richard Lambert – has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t:

In the fall of 2001, following the 9/11 attacks, a series of anthrax mailings occurred which killed five Americans and sickened 17 others. Four anthrax-laden envelopes were recovered which were addressed to two news media outlets in New York City (the New York Post and Tom Brokaw at NBC) and two senators in Washington D.C. (Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle). The anthrax letters addressed to New York were mailed on September 18, 2001, just seven days after the 9/11 attacks. The letters addressed to the senators were mailed 21 days later on October 9, 2001. A fifth mailing of anthrax is believed to have been directed to American Media, Inc. (AMI) in Boca Raton, Florida based upon the death of one AMI employee from anthrax poisoning and heavy spore contamination in the building.

Executive management at FBI Headquarters assigned responsibility for the anthrax investigation (code named “AMERITHRAX”) to the Washington Field Office (WFO), dubbing it the single most important case in the FBI at that time. In October 2002, in the wake of surging media criticism, White House impatience with a seeming lack of investigative progress by WFO, and a concerned Congress that was considering revoking the FBI’s charter to investigate terrorism cases, Defendant FBI Director Mueller reassigned Plaintiff from the FBI’s San Diego Field Office to the Inspection Division at FBI Headquarters and placed Plaintiff in charge of the AMERITHRAX case as an “Inspector.” While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation.

On July 6, 2006, Plaintiff provided a whistleblower report of mismanagement to the FBI’s Deputy Director pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 2303. Reports of mismanagement conveyed in writing and orally included: (a) WFO’s persistent understaffing of the AMERITHRAX investigation; (b) the threat of WFO’s Agent in charge to retaliate if Plaintiff disclosed the understaffing to FBI Headquarters; (c) WFO’s insistence on staffing the AMERITHRAX investigation principally with new Agents recently graduated from the FBI Academy resulting in an average investigative tenure of 18 months with 12 of 20 Agents assigned to the case having no prior investigative experience at all; (d) WFO’s eviction of the AMERITHRAX Task Force from the WFO building in downtown Washington and its relegation to Tysons Corner, Virginia to free up space for Attorney General Ashcroft’s new pornography squads; (e) FBI Director’s Mueller’s mandate to Plaintiff to “compartmentalize” the AMERITHRAX investigation by stove piping the flow of case information and walling off task force members from those aspects of the case not specifically assigned to them – a move intended to stem the tide of anonymous media leaks by government officials regarding details of the investigation. [Lambert complained about compartmentalizing and stovepiping of the investigation in a 2006 declaration.  See this, this and this]

This sequestration edict decimated morale and proved unnecessary in light of subsequent civil litigation which established that the media leaks were attributable to the United States Attorney for the District of the District of Columbia and to a Supervisory Special Agent in the FBI’s National Press Office, not to investigators on the AMERITHRAX Task Force; (f) WFO’s diversion and transfer of two Ph.D. Microbiologist Special Agents from their key roles in the investigation to fill billets for an 18 month Arabic language training program in Israel; (g) the FBI Laboratory’s deliberate concealment from the Task Force of its discovery of human DNA on the anthrax-laden envelope addressed to Senator Leahy and the Lab’s initial refusal to perform comparison testing; (h) the FBI Laboratory’s refusal to provide timely and adequate scientific analyses and forensic examinations in support of the investigation; (i) Defendant Kelley’s erroneous and subsequently quashed legal opinion that regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) precluded the Task Force’s collection of evidence in overseas venues; (j) the FBI’s fingering of Bruce Ivins as the anthrax mailer; and, (k) the FBI’s subsequent efforts to railroad the prosecution of Ivins in the face of daunting exculpatory evidence.

Following the announcement of its circumstantial case against Ivins, Defendants DOJ and FBI crafted an elaborate perception management campaign to bolster their assertion of Ivins’ guilt. These efforts included press conferences and highly selective evidentiary presentations which were replete with material omissions. Plaintiff further objected to the FBI’s ordering of Plaintiff not to speak with the staff of the CBS television news magazine 60 Minutes or investigative journalist David Willman, after both requested authorization to interview Plaintiff.

In April 2008, some of Plaintiff’s foregoing whistleblower reports were profiled on the CBS television show 60 Minutes. This 60 Minutes segment was critical of FBI executive management’s handling of the AMERITHRAX investigation, resulting in the agency’s embarrassment and the introduction of legislative bills calling for the establishment of congressional inquiries and special commissions to examine these issues – a level of scrutiny the FBI’s Ivins attribution could not withstand.

After leaving the AMERITHRAX investigation in 2006, Plaintiff continued to publicly opine that the quantum of circumstantial evidence against Bruce Ivins was not adequate to satisfy the proof-beyond-a-reasonable doubt threshold required to secure a criminal conviction in federal court. Plaintiff continued to advocate that while Bruce Ivins may have been the anthrax mailer, there is a wealth of exculpatory evidence to the contrary which the FBI continues to conceal from Congress and the American people.

Exonerating Evidence for Ivins

Agent Lambert won’t publicly disclose the exculpatory evidence against Ivins. As the New York Times reports:

[Lambert] declined to be specific, saying that most of the information was protected by the Privacy Act and was unlikely to become public unless Congress carried out its own inquiry.

But there is already plenty of exculpatory evidence in the public record.

For example:

  • Handwriting analysis failed to link the anthrax letters to known writing samples from Ivins
  • No textile fibers were found in Ivins’ office, residence or vehicles matching fibers found on the scotch tape used to seal the envelopes
  • No pens were found matching the ink used to address the envelopes
  • Samples of his hair failed to match hair follicles found inside the Princeton, N.J., mailbox used to mail the letters
  • No souvenirs of the crime, such as newspaper clippings, were found in his possession as commonly seen in serial murder cases
  • The FBI could not place Ivins at the crime scene with evidence, such as gas station or other receipts, at the time the letters were mailed in September and October 2001
  • Lab records show the number of late nights Ivins put in at the lab first spiked in August 2001, weeks before the 9/11 attacks

As noted above, the FBI didn’t want to test the DNA sample found on the anthrax letter to Senator Leahy.  In addition, McClatchy points out:

After locking in on Ivins in 2007, the bureau stopped searching for a match to a unique genetic bacterial strain scientists had found in the anthrax that was mailed to the Post and to NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, although a senior bureau official had characterized it as the hottest clue to date.

Anthrax vaccine expert Meryl Nass. M.D., notes:

The FBI’s alleged motive is bogus. In 2001, Bioport’s anthrax vaccine could not be (legally) relicensed due to potency failures, and its impending demise provided room for Ivins’ newer anthrax vaccines to fill the gap. Ivins had nothing to do with developing Bioport’s vaccine, although in addition to his duties working on newer vaccines, he was charged with assisting Bioport to get through licensure.


The FBI report claims the anthrax letters envelopes were sold in Frederick, Md. Later it admits that millions of indistinguishable envelopes were made, with sales in Maryland and Virginia.


FBI emphasizes Ivins’ access to a photocopy machine, but fails to mention it was not the machine from which the notes that accompanied the spores were printed.

FBI Fudged the Science

16 government labs had access to the same strain of anthrax as used in the anthrax letters.

The FBI admitted that up to 400 people had access to flask of anthrax in Dr. Ivins’ lab.  In other words, even if the killer anthrax came from there, 399 other people might have done it.

Moreover, even the FBI’s claim that the killer anthrax came from Ivins’ flask has completely fallen apart. Specifically, both the National Academy of Science and the Government Accountability Office – both extremely prestigious, nonpartisan agencies – found that FBI’s methodology and procedures for purportedly linking the anthrax flask maintained by Dr. Ivins with the anthrax letters was sloppy, inconclusive and full of holes.  They found that the alleged link wasn’t very strong … and that there was no firm link.  Indeed, the National Academy of Sciences found that the anthrax mailed to Congressmen and the media could have come from a different source altogether than the flask maintained by Ivins.

Additionally, the Ft. Detrick facility – where Ivins worked – only handled liquid anthrax.  But the killer anthrax was a hard-to-make dry powder form of anthrax.  Ft. Detrick doesn’t produce dry anthrax; but other government labs – for example Dugway (in Utah) and Batelle (in Ohio) – do.

The anthrax in the letters was also incredibly finely ground; and the FBI’s explanation for how the anthrax became so finely ground doesn’t even pass the smell test.

Further, the killer anthrax in the letters had a very high-tech  anti-static coating so that the anthrax sample “floated off the glass slide and was lost” when scientists tried to examine it.  Specifically, the killer anthrax was coated with polyglass and each anthrax spore given an electrostatic charge, so that it would repel other spores and “float”.   This was very advanced bio-weapons technology to which even Ivins’ bosses said he didn’t have access.

Top anthrax experts like Richard Spertzel say that Ivins didn’t do it. Spertzel also says that only 4 or 5 people in the entire country knew how to make anthrax of the “quality” used in the letters, that Spertzel was one of them, and it would have taken him a year with a full lab and a staff of helpers to do it. As such, the FBI’s claim that Ivins did it alone working a few nights is ludicrous.

Moreover, the killer anthrax contained silicon … but the anthrax in Ivins’ flask did not.  The FBI claimed the silicon present in the anthrax letters was absorbed from its surroundings … but Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories completely debunked that theory. In other words, silicon was intentionally added to the killer anthrax to make it more potent.  Ivins and Ft. Detrick didn’t have that capability … but other government labs did.

Similarly, Sandia National Lab found the presence of iron and tin in the killer anthrax … but NOT in Ivins’ flask of anthrax.

Sandia also found that there was a strain of bacteria in one of the anthrax letters not present in Ivins’ flask. (The bacteria, iron, tin and silicon were all additives which made the anthrax in the letters more deadly.)

The Anthrax Frame Up

Ivins wasn’t the first person framed for the anthrax attacks …

Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country. And see this.

People don’t remember now, but the “war on terror” and Iraq war were largely based on the claim that Saddam and Muslim extremists were behind the anthrax attacks (and see this and this)

And the anthrax letters pushed a terrified Congress into approving the Patriot Act without even reading it. Coincidentally, the only Congressmen who received anthrax letters were the ones who were likely to oppose the Patriot Act.

And – between the bogus Al Qaeda/Iraq claims and the FBI’s fingering of Ivins as the killer – the FBI was convinced that another U.S. government scientist, Steven Hatfill, did it.  The government had to pay Hatfill $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit for being falsely accused.

Ivins’ Convenient Death

It is convenient for the FBI that Ivins died.

The Wall Street Journal points out:

No autopsy was performed [on Ivins], and there was no suicide note.

Dr. Nass points out:

FBI fails to provide any discussion of why no autopsy was performed, nor why, with Ivins under 24/7 surveillance from the house next door, with even his garbage being combed through, the FBI failed to notice that he overdosed and went into a coma. Nor is there any discussion of why the FBI didn’t immediately identify tylenol as the overdose substance, and notify the hospital, so that a well-known antidote for tylenol toxicity could be given (N-acetyl cysteine, or alternatively glutathione). These omissions support the suggestion that Ivins’ suicide was a convenience for the FBI. It enabled them to conclude the anthrax case, in the absence of evidence that would satisfy the courts.

Indeed, one of Ivins’ colleagues at Ft. Deitrich thinks he was murdered.

Whether murder or suicide, Ivins’ death was very convenient for the FBI, as dead men can’t easily defend themselves.

This entry was posted in Politics / World News, Science / Technology. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.democracynow.org/2008/8/4/anthrax



    How come no one ever brings up the fact that the DEAD GUY they pinned it on was a white anglo-saxon American, yet he wrote “allah is great” on the anthrax letters??? So obviously, someone who wanted to “BLAME THE MUSLIMS” did it. EVERYTHING to do with 911 was designed to “blame the Muslims”. Now who would do that?
    How about the only two guys in congress that had anthrax mailed to them were holding up The Patriot Act: Pat Leahy and Daschle.

    • sisterlauren

      I’d believe that Rove and/or Cheney did it.

      • bloggulator

        Or rather, took part in the planning and concept. The people who actually “did it” were probably taken out soon after the event(s) by targeted assassination, so as to prevent future whistle blowing.

      • teller123

        I’d believe any person sitting in political office would do something like that…. well not personally but they all know who they can call to have these things done for them.

    • Nixak*77*

      Obviously whoever was behind the Anthrax Attacks was almost certainly behind the 9-11 ‘New Pearl Harbor’ event- And the Anthrax Attack points straight at the US’ own Military Industrial Intel-Surveillance {in}Security Complex- all on Bush Jr’s & ‘Darth Vader’ Cheney’s NeoCON regime’s watch.

      IMO at-least half or more of the so-called ‘Islamic Terror’ event are most likely ‘False-Flag’ IE [a short list]:
      – The ‘Sham’ Pan Am 103 beef- spun to demonize Qaddafy & Libya
      – The 9-11 ‘New Pearl Harbor’ event in tandem w the Sept – Oct 2001 Anthrax Attack
      – The May 1, 2011 Bin Laden ‘0-Dark-30 Kill’ Black Op [FYI: OBL most likely died in Dec 2001 from chronic kidney disease or possible KIA at Tora Bora]
      – The Alleged ‘Pro Assad’ ‘Iran-Hezbolah linked’ militia so-called ‘Kidnapping’ of NBC’s Rich Engels in Dec 2012, has just been shown to been an AL-CIAeda linked ‘FSA’ staged ‘False-Flag’ ploy [IMO likely w NBC & Engel’s knowledge- at-least immediately after the fact]
      – the Aug 2013 Sarin Attack near Damascus [staged to demonize Assad & almost led to a US-NATO bombing assault on Syria]
      – ISIS has ‘conveniently’ been an excuse for OBomber & NATO to Bomb Syria [as well as Iraq] anyway, after the Putin blocked the 2013 Sarin ‘False-Flag’ Casus Belli ploy.
      – The July shoot down of Mly Flt17 over Ukraine [used to demonize Putin & the pro-Russian rebel Ukrainians vs that US-EU backed Neo-NAZI Coup Regime in Kiev]
      – This Year’s Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris [IMO upon close exam again does NOT pass the smell test]
      – The beheading of those Egyptian Copts in Libya allegedly by ISIS [that ISIS ‘be-header’ gave a speech in US ENGLISH to US & EU ‘Crusaders’- yet Egypt’s Copts were NOT ‘Crusaders’, they speak Arabic, & most folks in the US {& likely the EU} don’t even know who the Copts are]

      All of these ‘false flag’ attacks, except Mly Flt17’s shoot-down, have been used to demonize Muslims in general & Arabs in particular [Note: ironically Saddam, Assad, & Qaddafy were among the more ‘secularized’ / NON Islamic-fanatic regimes in the Arab World], w MLY Flt17 being used to demonize Putin & Russia, along w ethnic Russians in Ukraine vs Kiev’s Neo-NAZI coup regime. IMO it’s been a cynical broad / sweeping Dis-Info campaign vs Islam. So how can we know if a so-called ‘Islamic Terror’ attack is NOT really a ‘False-Flag???

      • Laurent

        You forgot Nemtsov’s assasination in Moscow, to be added to your list…

  • jadan

    The war on terror is a psyop, which means it is an elaborate fraud practiced on the American people by their own government. From the OKC bombing onwards. The Manhattan Project signaled the end of any semblance of democratic governance. “National security” trumps all in the National Security Act of 1947. Abominations such as the Patriot Act and its spawn, the Department of Homeland Security, with the traditional NSA and other secret police, make up the framework for a totalitarian counter terrorism apparatus which is proving more viable than the USSR or Nazi Germany old style fascist central control.

    • R_of_R

      FBI was also responsible for the bombing of the WTC in the 90s. They provided the explosives there and for Oklahoma City. In fact, Terry Nichols, from prison, said some of those explosives were still under his house with an agent’s fingerprints on them. Who raced to retrieve them before the guilty agent could be identified? Eric Holder.

      One sickening rabbit hole of false flags used to pass draconian legislation and create a police & national security state.

      • jim

        u one of those people that thinks fbi was behind WTC ur a moron

  • Brisa25

    Just another false flag.

  • blackbird9

    Always remember that it was FBI Special Agent Dale Watson who oversaw the
    “non-investigations” of both 9-11 and the Anthrax “false flag” terrorist attacks.

    Dale Watson also assisted in the “non-investigation” of the Oklahoma City “false flag” bombings back in 1995.

    After leaving the FBI in 2002, Dale Watson went to work for Booz, Allen and Hamilton.

    The person most conspicuous by this FBI “non-investigation” was Dr. Philip K. Zack who was caught on security cameras entering Anthrax storage area at Fort Detrick without authorization AFTER he had been fired for a racially motivated attack on an Egyptian co-worker.

    – bb9

    • 1horse



      yes. and
      0f jusSuch/

      0 m i t s

      — mission


      • 1horse

        ^ ^
        * C®0WN * i n g – i n g – i n g
        /chie/means re:re:®epeat/fter//∑
        //∑ meme /ll₮alk’n’∑ch0la la lalia


        * ₮EMPLE BAR *
        ˅ ˅
        ˅ ˅
        0nlyN0ʬ:.. ? ..:as*clear as*MUD

        ——– as*s e e n,
        0bscene, ∑/∑R∯urther
        ʬ0T’s n o t jusPetti∯oggery

        ” . . . /dding new deposits to the crust upon crust of mud, sticking
        at those points tenaciously to the pavement, and accumulating at
        compound interest.

        Fog everywhere.
        Fog up the river, where it flows among green aits and meadows;
        fog down the river, where it rolls defiled among the tiers of shipping and the
        waterside pollutions of a great (and dirty) city.
        Fog on the Essex marshes,
        fog on the Kentish heights.
        Fog creeping into the cabooses of collier-brigs;
        fog lying out on the yards, and hovering in the rigging of great ships;
        fog drooping on the gunwales of barges and small boats.
        Fog in the eyes and throats of ancient Greenwich pensioners,
        wheezing by the firesides of their wards;
        fog in the stem and bowl of the afternoon pipe of the
        wrathful skipper, down in his close cabin;
        fog cruelly pinching the toes and fingers of his shivering little ’prentice boy on deck.
        Chance people on the bridges peeping over the parapets into a nether sky of fog,
        ʬith fog all round them, as if they were up in a balloon, and hanging in the misty clouds.
        . . .
        The raw afternoon is rawest,
        and the dense fog is densest,
        and the muddy streets are muddiest near that leaden-headed
        old obstruction, appropriate ornament for the threshold of a leaden-headed
        old corporation,
        Temple Bar.

        And hard by
        Temple Bar,
        in Lincoln’s Inn Hall,
        at the very heart of the fog,
        sits the Lord High Chancellor
        in his High Court of Chancery.
        . . .
        ʬhich has its decaying houses and its blighted lands in every shire,
        ʬhich has its worn-out lunatic in every madhouse and its dead in every churchyard,
        ʬhich has its ruined suitor with his slipshod heels and threadbare dress
        borrowing&begging through the round of every man’s acquaintance,
        ʬhich gives to monied might the means abundantly of wearying out the right,
        ʬhich so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope, so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart, that there is not an honourable man among its practitioners who would not give —
        who does not often give —

        SUFFER any wrong that can be done you rather than come here!” ]]]]]]

        • EdwardN

          I would delete all your posts, ban your account and your IP. Not sure what this wasn’t done automatically.

          • 1horse


            //0T . . . theDick∑ndz∑dʬard
            Wow … … ([ inDeed&inFFact

            ʬhether2hrs or25days/goG0 kkkʬazzzy
            u “took a long time and …
            when your PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT”])

            . . . rep.rep et.etc inter alia & et al f_ _k f_ c_ ∯**k

            *****DELETED MY ENTIRE POST*****

            U [[don’t deserve 1 fucking iota of recognition for this PIECE OF SHIT POST that doesn’t offer 1 fucking original idea in the first fucking place.

            Fuck____ ____
            fuck ____ ____ ]]

  • Governments always use fear tactics for more power to gain more control over the masses. This video illustrates this from with the whole Anthrax scare with the medias help.

    Oct 21, 2014 Ebola

    “Ebola” is a video critique of the role that the media plays in terrorizing the public by hyping and selling pandemic fears, including the current Ebola “crisis” in the US. Inspired by Jason Vosu’s video critique of the 2001 anthrax scare which is shown in this video and available here:


  • Former FBI Chief ADMITS Government is Involved in Most ‘Terrorist’ Attacks!


  • Axel



    ? < (The and only 2 of many possible attachments) (Obviously, concerning and sadly and within a considerable very lengthy amount of time there is more within 'Google' searches, 'Anthrax Whistleblowers' and other related searches).

    Thanks you for the many great and supportive comments and replies and also within W'sblog efforts to keep this and these and many other important concerns and comments to your due diligence and attention ……………

    • Axel

      Readers, please note and as I just and very briefly viewed the ‘Defrauding America by former FAA Whistleblower Rodney Stitch’ link that it appears reasonable to suggest that people of young age and/or maturity should ask a mature adult, parent or similar person for supervision, permission and/or consent to view some graphic content and/or context and as within and also a ‘Illuminate’ search.

  • Nancy

    ➧➧℔℔℔℔℔℔===℔℔℔℔℔℔℔℔ Nancy———-,, if you think Irene `s blog is great, last week…….

    I got a new Dodge after having made 9593 this-past/4 weeks and-more than, ten thousand this past-munth . with-out a doubt this is the most-comfortable work I have ever had . ..

    I began this seven months/ago and immediately was bringin home at least 85… per/hr . visit this site right here


    ➡➡➡➡ http://SpecialOpportunities


    • RealityAlwaysBites

      Hey guest thanks to the puritan defects prostitution is still illegal. That makes your ad soliciting for prostitution illegal. You are better off to use craigslist for advertising your ho service.

  • ddearborn


    Obviously the entire op was run by a foreign agent. A Dr. imminently qualified in handling and using anthrax-an expert in this field. A man with dual loyalties and citizenship. A man who is a devout believer-and most certainly NOT A FOLLOWER OF ISLAM! In short, a man with the means, motive and opportunity. The one man who, despite the overwhelming amount of evidence painting him the criminal, was carefully, methodically and systemically protected by traitors at the very highest levels of not just the FBI, but many others in Washington. Because to do to do any less would quickly and directly indict the country behind 9-11.

    When looked at in retrospect, one quickly realizes that the evidence was so overwhelming, so damning and so obvious that the traitors, dual citizen agents and criminals involved had no choice but to employ such blatant, extraordinary and treasonous actions on display throughout the investigation as documented here. History has a way of extracting the truth. And the country responsible for 9-11 will eventually have to face the consequences and wraith of the American people.

  • Hammerhead

    Oh, come on. Everybody knows the Israeli’s were behind this thing. It was meant to keep the pot boiling after their success on 9/11. The Israelis, with their Zionist helpers in the U.S. government, pulled both of them off. The so-called Sunni Muslim extremists have been controlled by Mossad from the beginning. Key people in the terrorist groups have been deliberately allowed to escape custody, including those directly linked to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Wake up. These monsters are capable of anything, and I mean anything.

  • BadClown

    ‘Dem FBI guys didn’t fools me back then, ’cause I has a degree ‘n knows stuff!

  • bloggulator

    Solve Amerithrax, and we solve 9/11. The two events were very closely related.

    • Done already and now you will be in the know, and Anthrax was all propaganda from the FBI! HOW ALTERNATIVE MEDIA INFLUENCED THE YEAR OF AWAKENING by Mikael Thalen December 31st, 2013

      While some see the year’s countless political scandals as a negative example of America’s current state, continued revelations and increased public knowledge of government corruption has undoubtedly made 2013 the year of awakening.
      Although many of the year’s major news stories can be linked to the alternative media’s expanding influence, several in particular are undoubtedly connected to a surge in the public’s awakening.

      Western Governments Run Al Qaeda


      General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned – Seven Countries In Five Years

      “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”


    • nick quinlan
  • musings2

    Murder has no statute of limitations, nor is it free of blame if state-sponsored. Ivins was murdered.

  • Sure It Is

    Not to be forgotten the high level Bio scientists- the best in the world either mysteriously died or disappeared during this time. One whose car was found in the middle of the Bridge outside Memphis with the drivers door opened and the engine running. One who had an unheard of before breach in his bio suit in the airlock and died instantly. All top of their fields.

  • Billy Thompson

    Well gee, this doesn’t surprise me considering the smattering of FBI terrorist patsies strewn about the united states. All this has been is a series of coordinated strikes to drum up terrorism fears, and clamp down on law abiding citizens by enacting bullsh!t legislation like NDAA, Patriot Act, etc.

    The Federal Government, and all the organizations that go along with the FED, ARE. THE. ENEMIES.

  • junktex

    Yet another conspiracy theory proven to be fact

  • Defiant

    It’s hard to separate the truth from misinformation. One thing is for sure…IF the FBI tanked this investigation…there will be ZERO accountability for the perps…you can take that to the bank.

  • Barbaracvm

    James Risen book STATE OF WAR might answer some of the questions leading up to why the anthrax scare. 9 – 11 and the military industrial complex are all interrelated.

  • Harold Smith

    One big give-away that proves the “government” is lying about Ivins is the fact that Ivins’ boss was apparently not even reprimanded, let alone fired. If Ivins really did grow and process the anthrax while at work, on the taxpayers’ dime, while he was supposed to be doing other things, there would’ve been a big shake-up in the Ft. Detrick management staff.
    Lambert should call Ivins’ boss and co-workers as witnesses. Ivins’ boss should be asked why he wasn’t even reprimanded for such a serious lack of supervisory oversight.
    Also, what I want to know is: Why didn’t Ivins’ family take any kind of legal action against the “government”?

    • Eddy

      The same reason the victims relatives of 911 with drew their legal actions, it’s called the BUY OFF. So much for the value of some folks relations.

  • AnthraxSleuth

    Where to start…
    I received an Anthrax letter the day after Columbus day in 2001. It was all down hill from there. At the hospital I was put in contact with Special Agent Jim Page of the Raleigh FBI. S.A. Jim Page is an a..clown plain and simple. He bent over backwards to insure that my case was not investigated. You see, I was targeted the same way Ottilie Lundgren and Cathy Nguyen were. All three of us posted on the MSNBC com message board around the same time. That is where the perps got our addresses. I personally caught Steven Hatfill snooping around my house in November of 2001. I even got him to admit he was in my state, North Carolina, in November 2001 when he was on the Alex Jones show November 6th 2015. (towards the end of the 2nd hour if you want to hear it yourself)
    He was arrogant enough to wear his army jacket when he was snooping around my house in the middle of nowhere NC. I read his name off his jacket and gave it to Agent Eric Davis at the Charlotte FBI. I contacted Agent Davis b/c Special Agent Jim Page was such an a..clown. That was 7 months before Hatfill’s name became public.
    My favorite quote from Special Agent Jim Page was that Ottillie, Cathy and myself posting in the message board was “just a coincidence.”
    There is plenty more I could tell you but it would fill a book.
    What I will tell you now is this.
    Since the FBI decided to play cover up; the result is, I still have physical evidence of the Anthrax that was mailed to me. That’s right. I still have some of the Anthrax from 2001 that I received in the mail to this day. On top of that. If MSNBC has any kind of archive of their message board then there is also that evidence of Ottillie, Cathy, and myself posting in there.

    Don’t get me wrong. I do not think Steven Hatfill did this alone. He is certainly not smart enough for that considering he would go case a victim’s house while wearing his name on his pocket.

    And now you know why the Westgate post office, which handles all mail for NC tested positive for Anthrax in 2001. And not the BS story put out by the FBI that it was from a bunch of stamps they received.

    • Axel

      A suggestion and as I only partially read your comment.
      I have to presume you have had at least provided the reasonable intelligence to report your allegations and/or findings immediately, directly and in writing, via e-mail to Mr. Tom Devine and Ms Jesselyn Radack et all at the Government Accountability Project, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts at his e-mail address, Dr. Francis A. Boyle at his Chicago University, Illinois Edu website Dr. Professors Stephen Lendman and Professor Michel Chossudovsky at their GlobalResearch.ca website e-mail addresses and your friends at the Alex Jones show.
      Incidentally, your comment mentions the date of 11/6/2015 as to your appearance on the Alex Jones show? Please correct this error.

      • AnthraxSleuth

        You should read the entire comment.
        I did not appear on the Alex Jones Show.
        Steven Hatfill did. On the date I specified.
        I was the first caller who spoke to Steven Hatfill.
        There is no error to correct.

        • Axel


          Your comment mentions the date of 11/6/2015 and today is and as you well know is 4/19/2015 and that the Alex Jones 11/6/2015 broadcast that you mentioned apparently has not yet aired according to your….? telephone call appearance ?….?
          Thank you for any validity within your original comment.
          I had expected and I would suggest and expect that you have considered the concerns within your statements and comments, thereof, towards and upon all others……………………..

          • AnthraxSleuth

            You are correct. It should say 11-06-2014

          • Putna

            youtube video name is
            Alex Jones Show: Thursday (11-6-14) Dr. Steven Hatfill

            its at 1h51min.

  • tikibam

    Director Mueller is accessory to murder. If he isn’t picked up and given the death penalty, a military tribunal should be assembled and swiftly rendition him for a slow, torturous interview. We MUST cut heads off at the top.

  • teller123

    WHAT??? We’ve been lied to by the government? I am so fed up with those cockroaches I would be happy to see them all on the Titanic and wouldn’t drop a rope to save a single one of them and their corrupt rich puppet masters. I sure wish the rest of the country is where I am now. We would not have anything to worry about except cleaning up the mess they’ve created but at least we wouldn’t be sitting here waiting for them to finish stealing everything we have and most likely murdering more millions of people, including a whole lot of us. I know it’s coming and I pray the rest of the country figures it out fast, but I doubt they will. I still am hearing ‘Oh they would never do that here’ at least once a week,

  • John Smith

    FBI lied about hair analysis and comparative bullet-lead analysis hyped by the FBI turned out to be bogus, but not before innocent folks got railroaded. I believe Ivins was a guilt as Richard Jewell.

  • Rafe Husain

    if obama keeps letting this kind of info out he better watch out for the kennedy treatment from the deep state

  • lsam53

    Well…duh! We have such crack journalists in this country! It was a very clumsy scam.

  • Gary Seven

    It was painfully obvious that the Anthrax attack was aimed at anyone who might challenge the official narrative of the NWO and its minions. It was perfectly logical to assume that a silencing would be in the works after the 9-11 inside job. I am pleased that the SAC of the FBI investigation was the one who is helping break this coverup. He reminds me of the former Scottish Office minister, Alan Stewart who questioned the false evidence that Libyans were responsible for Pan Am 103.

  • lilyamelia118

    Valuable piece , Incidentally if you are requiring a a form , my friend filled out and faxed a template version here https://goo.gl/zQZPQW.

  • Richard Lee Deplorable