One of U.S. White House’s Top Ukrainian Gangsters Gets U.S. Reprimand

Eric Zuesse

Ihor Kolomoysky, a Ukrainian oligarch and friend of the Obama White House (he is the employer of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden), has now been reprimanded by America’s own Ambassador in Ukraine, after he had used physical force in a corporate dispute.

Kolomoysky (whose net worth is estimated at $3-$6 billion) is famous for his corporate-takeover tactic of storming a target-company’s headquarters with his private army and ousting the current management at gunpoint — and replacing them with his own team. America’s Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt, has now informed him, in no uncertain terms, that “the law of the jungle” must end in Ukraine.

Pyatt told Kolomoysky: After the change in control of the Ukrainian Government a year ago (which the head of Stratfor called “the most blatant coup in history,” and which is shown and discussed in this video), the practices that formerly were accepted in Ukraine are no longer acceptable. Pyatt then spoke to the press, and said: “He understands, like most of the political leaders of Ukraine, that the circumstances and the environment in Ukraine have changed. And the law of the jungle that existed under Yanukovych [who was the coup-overthrown former President] is a recipe for disaster and tragedy for Ukraine. … It is not suitable for Ukrainian realities.” He added that, “it is important to resolve such issues solely on the basis of justice and the rule of law.”

Here is Ambassador Pyatt, as he had been heard 18 days before the coup, taking instructions from Victoria Nuland of the U.S. State Department, regarding whom to get appointed to lead Ukraine after the U.S-run coup would be completed. The selected person did end up receiving that appointment. So: Ambassador Pyatt’s statements are taken very seriously by Ukrainian Government officials.

However, Kolomoysky is also a politically respected figure in Ukraine: He is a leader, and the top financial backer, of the hard-right bloc in the Ukrainian parliament, which favors a more aggressive pursuit of the civil war against the residents of the Donbass region, who have established two “People’s Republics” there. He also finances several armed battalions in that war.

The latest dust-up with Kolomoysky started when the Administration of Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko, who is a political opponent of Kolomoysky (Kolomoysky has even gone so far as to say, “I will never obey Poroshenko” and “My army will finish the separatists”), replaced the Chairman of Ukrtransnafta, the company that has a monopoly on oil-transportation in Ukraine, and in which Kolomoysky is a minority shareholder but has controlled the board until now. The Ukrainian Government is the majority-owner, and on March 19th they replaced Kolomoysky’s Chairman, Aleksandr Lazorko, with President Poroshenko’s choice, Yuri Miroshnik. That evening, this photo was taken and shown on Russian Television, of Kolomoysky’s armed ‘lawyers’ entering the facility to persuade Poroshenko’s officials not to follow through with this.

Screen Shot 2015-03-22 at 6.28.13 PM

http://rt.com/news/242401-kolomoysky-armed-raid-ukraine/

Vladimir Demchishin, the Energy Minister of Ukraine, was outraged. He said, on Thursday evening, that Kolomoysky’s ‘lawyers’ who were then occupying the company’s office, would likely spend the night there “burning the financial documents” — destroying legal evidence.

One of the reasons why Poroshenko’s team had made this executive change unannounced was that there have been allegations that another Kolomoysky company, an oil-storage concern, has been systematically stealing from Ukrtransnafta some of the oil it stores. According to one account: in May 2014, Ukrtransnafta, on their own initiative, pumped from the main oil pipelines more than 670 thousand tons of technological oil. If there has now been a burning of financial documents (and someone did report the smell of kerosene on the entering ‘lawyers’), then perhaps even an honest investigation (which would be a rarity in Ukraine) would be inconclusive.

Sergey Leshchenko, a parliamentarian from the bloc of President Poroshenko, condemned the action by Kolomoysky: “The Governor [Kolomoysky was appointed as one of the regional governors when Yanukovych was overthrown] should not have crossed that line. An armed seizure of a state-run company in the center of Kiev is a personal challenge to Poroshenko, his legitimacy.” He continued, “I pin my hopes on the West” to see that justice is done in the matter.

———-

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity, and of Feudalism, Fascism, Libertarianism and Economics.

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Business / Economics, Energy / Environment, General, Politics / World News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • But history is about power, and the West is using its power to press Russia hard. But obviously, nothing is more dangerous than wounding a bear. Killing him is better, but killing Russia has not proved easy.

  • Dr Smileyface

    Most informative as always Mr Z.

    Just a small point, you talk about thugs with guns as operating under the “Law of the jungle”, but isn’t this a bit unfair to denizens of jungle habitats? This kind of behavior mostly originates in ‘developed’ countries; in particular USA during the semi-mythic “Wild West” and the period of “Prohibition” in the early 20th century. Recently this ‘prohibition violence’ has been outsourced to Mexico.

    I suggest that in future, we define such actions as conforming to the “Law of the City” – and leave what jungle is left in peace.