Evidence About the Connection Between the Ukrainian Coup and Crimea’s Breakaway

Eric Zuesse

Little attention is generally paid to the connection between the February 2014 coup in Ukraine, and Crimea’s breakaway from Ukraine. The testimony that will here be cited helps fill this in. An attorney in the federal prosecutor’s office at the time of the coup refers to the longtime national socialist, Andriy Paribiy, as having been the key person behind the coup. In the new regime, Paribiy became appointed to become the chief of national security, and the top person overseeing the war against “ATO” ‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ to exterminate the residents in the formerly Ukrainian area, Donbass, the area which had voted 90% for the overthrown President Viktor Yanukovych, and which consequently rejected this new regime, which Washington violently imposed to replace him.  

Below is a Crimean TV interview with Natalya Poklonskaya, who was a senior criminal prosecutor in Kiev at the time of the February 2014 Maidan demonstrations and overthrow of President Yanukovych, and who resigned her post during the coup and drove back to her childhood home in Crimea, because she objected to what she called “nazis” who, she said, had done the overthrow; she objected to the way that Yanukovych was replaced, and to the unconstitutional and violent nature of it, which she didn’t view as being a democratic action, at all, but instead a “nazi” one.

This interview was telecast shortly after the February 2014 overthrow, but before the March 16th referendum in Crimea on whether to reject the new Government and to rejoin Russia (of which Crimea had been a part during 1783-1954).

Poklonskaya was interviewed in this call-in live TV show so as to inform her fellow Crimeans what she had seen happen during the overthrow, and why she couldn’t, in good conscience, remain as a Ukrainian official in Kiev, and swear loyalty to the new Ukrainian Government there. She had heard the chants of the Maidan protesters and smelled their piles of burning tires, and seen their marches in Kiev with nazi symbols and salutes, and she didn’t want to become any part of that. So, she quit and was now unemployed back home in Crimea at the time of this interview.

The key moments in this interview are shown below, with English subscripts. (Here is the full interview, for anyone who wants to see that:


Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.19.49 PM

“He” refers to 

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.23.05 PM

Andriy Paribiy was the co-founder (along with Oleh Tyahnybok) of the Social Nationalist Party of Ukraine, which the CIA had persuaded to change its name to “Freedom” or “Svoboda” in order not to offend Westerners with its origin as a native Ukrainian version of Hitler’s National Socialist Party of Germany. Polonskaya said:

“He was standing on Maidan and delivering orders.” The interviewer asked:

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.28.07 PM

She then asked, rhetorically:

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.31.05 PM

And she answered, also as a question (since she’s a good trial-lawyer):

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.33.44 PM

She was asked her view of the new Ukrainian Government’s declaration that this referendum in Crimea would be illegal:

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.41.01 PM

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.42.39 PM

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.44.50 PM

Screen Shot 2015-02-15 at 12.46.07 PM

The referendum took place entirely peacefully, because Russian troops from Crimea’s naval base in Sevastopol Crimea prevented an invasion from Kiev. The results were 96% for reunion with Russia. A 2013 Gallup poll of Crimeans, and also a 2014 Gallup poll of Crimeans after the referndum, both showed overwhelming support for Russia and opposition to the United States; and the 2014 poll also showed that almost all Crimeans thought that the referendum-results had been free and fair and accurately reflected the views of Crimenans. However, the United States Government, and its allies, claim that the overthrow of Yanukovych was legal and that the reunification of Crimea with Russia was not, and also that the ethnic cleansing against the residents in the Donbass region of the former Ukraine is legal and that the military assistance that Russia is providing to enable those residents to defend themselves from being exterminated is not. The United States Government, and its Ukrainian Government, call that extermination-program Ukraine’s “Anti Terrorist Operation,” and the United States is sending Ukraine weapons to carry it out.

When the Crimean people voted to rejoin Russia when they did, they saved themselves from the fate that soon thereafter befell the residents in Donbass


Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

This entry was posted in Business / Economics, Energy / Environment, General, Politics / World News, Science / Technology and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Jo

    When the Washing town NAZIS invaded Mexico and annexed half of it in 1848 that was indeed an invasion and subsequent illegal annexation contrary to all international laws. What happened in Crimea in 2014 was a transparent referendum where the vast majority of Crimeans opted democratically to choose to live under Russian sovereignty rather than neocohen Nulandistan imposed fascism. Even if Crimea hadn’t been sovereign Russian territory since 1784 it would still have been a democratic decision taken by the vast majority of residents in a part of the world where the Washing town thugocracy has zero legitimacy.

    Americans (sic) still refuse to accept that their brutal extermination of the native American Peoples and their land grabbing so-called “Monroe Doctrine” was the inspiration of Adolf Hitler’s “Lebensraum” and NAZI policies of genocide which Anglozionazi banksters funded in Germany in the 1930’s. If you don’t already know that then get a copy of Hitler’s Mein Kampf and read all about his infatuation with USan supremacist racist insanity. From the Bellamy salute, to eugenics and extermination Adolf was a convinced admirer of the inherent psychopathic fascism deep in the marrow of the American (sic) bone. He would be a member of the US Congress today if he were alive or quite possibly sitiing in the “White” house colluding with killers and planning global terror for the Anglozionazi bankster cabal.

    What the criminals in Washing town must finally understand is that the world is tired of pox amerikana and recognizes the evil that emanates from all things they pursue.


  • Jo

    Hopefully gung hoers who invariably applaud the NAZI expansionist policies of their zero 1% Genocide Industry Complex owners and their our troopian canon fodder employees at Pentacon Kill Industries now understand the difference between “annexation” through aggressive and illegal invasion a la NAZI Germany and the democratically expressed will of a sovereign people returning to the fold of their roots and mother culture.

    Perhaps one day Mexicans north of the Rio Bravo will vote and decide to return their country after the American (sic) war machine runs out of foddstamp dollahs .

  • Ektor

    we made some investigations about Parubiy, here are some results :

  • CB1138

    I will be glad to provide any and all assistance to Natalya Poklonskaya.