Do We Want Solutions, Or Just What’s Easy?

We are so brainwashed by centralized models of state authority that few can even imagine a system where the solution is not one centralized monstrosity ruled by a political/financial Aristocracy but a competing profusion of opt-in, transparent solutions.

Many readers ask me for solutions to the current arrangement’s many ills. Seeking solutions is a healthy and positive direction, for highlighting what’s broken is not only much easier than proposing solutions, it’s a dead-end. Pointing out what’s broken is only the first step in crafting solutions.

But I’ve noticed that what most people want is not a real solution–they simply want what’s easy, which means leaving the Status Quo in place but magically making it cheaper and more convenient for them. If the solution requires inconvenience, getting less, accepting more responsibility and making major trade-offs–then it can’t be a solution because politicos have overpromised for so many decades that people expect everything to get cheaper (for them, not the system) and easier (for them, not the system).

For example, I proposed a simple solution to the unsustainably costly U.S. healthcare system: The “Impossible” Healthcare Solution: Go Back to Cash(July 29, 2009).

This solution would definitely lower costs and impose discipline on patients and providers alike–and for that reason, it is seen as “impossible,” because the last thing patients and cartels/state agencies want is discipline that forces hard choices and rigorous changes in behavior, diet, fitness habits, etc.

Broadly speaking, the first step in any healthcare solution is to radically reduce preventable diseases that result from lifestyle choices by making patients responsible for the consequences and costs of their lifestyle choices.

The next step is to make the real costs of treatment and coverage transparent, so people–patients and citizens– can see the real costs and make decisions based on the limits of cost, effectiveness, etc.

Both of these steps are absolute anathema in the current system.

I have addressed the systemic ills of U.S. healthcare (a.k.a. sickcare because it profits from sickness rather than from health), for many years, most recently inObamaCare: The Neutron Bomb That Will Decimate Employment (February 22, 2013). Over the years, I have presented a number of options to the present unsustainable, fraud-ridden, costs-twice-as-much-per-person-as-other-nations system that ObamaCare leaves intact:

Healthcare: A Large-Scale Solution (January 4, 2011)

A Sustainable National Healthcare System: Prevention Only (August 20, 2012)

How to Cut America’s Healthcare Spending by 50% (August 21, 2012)

Nobody likes any of the practical solutions because everyone wants unlimited care and unlimited choice. Expectations in a system where the government can just borrow another $1+ trillion to pay the bills are unrealistically high, and the feedback from reality, i.e. price, has been eliminated in the current cartel/state-fiefdom system.

Everyone talks about “reform,” but real reform is impossible in a bought-and-paid-for “democracy” like ours: Why Reform Won’t Work (February 7, 2013).

Even more profoundly, the Central State and ObamaCare are the wrong unit size to provide healthcare that is transparently priced, accountable to the consumer, adaptable and decentralized.

What If ObamaCare, Too Big To Fail Banks and the State Are All the Wrong Sized Unit?(February 25, 2013)

We are so brainwashed by centralized models of state authority that few can even imagine a system where the solution is not one centralized monstrosity ruled by a political/financial Aristocracy but a competing profusion of opt-in, transparent solutions.

Rather than a single top-down system, we need dozens of transparent opt-in choices.

Centralized, top-down systems are quickly stripped of innovation and cost control as the political and financial Aristocracy soon capture the regulatory and governance machinery for their own benefit.

As I noted in The Pareto Economy (February 18, 2013), 80% of the benefits could be reaped for 20% of the money squandered on our corrupt, fraudulent, ossified centralized systems.

We suffer not just from a systemic failure of imagination, but from a child-like desire for what’s easy and convenient. This is a theme I have explored many times:

Questioning “Progress” and the Poverty of our Imagination (June 11, 2010)

Oversupply of Old Failed Ideas, Undersupply of New Pragmatic Ideas (July 16, 2010)

Our Dust Bowl Economy (November 20, 2012)
When the present path cannot possibly lead to success, regardless of the labor and treasure poured into the effort, then risking the unknown by trying something different is the only way forward.

America Is Just Going Through the Motions

What If We’re Beyond Mere Policy Tweaks? (February 6, 2012)

Spoiled Teenager Syndrome (January 3, 2013)

A good first step would be to admit to ourselves that we don’t really want solutions; what we want is magic: financial magic that makes healthcare free and affordable, medical magic that fixes all our lifestyle ills without forcing any rigorous adult routines and limits on us, political magic that transforms our system from its current corrupt crony-capitalist paradise into a functioning, transparent democracy and economic magic that makes all the unpayable debt vanish so we can borrow another $50 trillion, or $100 trillion, with no restraints on our spending or cronyist corruption.

I have no idea what it will take to jolt us from our preference for magic over realistic, difficult (i.e. adult) solutions, but I suspect a crisis that threatens to completely unravel the Status Quo will be part of the process.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • paul

    We humans have all the resources we need to provide the best care for everyone. We choose not to do it and justify that choice with bogus scarcity claims, such as not enough money. Not enough money? Money is a fiction, even when it’s gold backed, or when it’s actual gold. No matter what you choose to represent money, it’s still an organizational tool. We have as much money as we need or we can have. What we don’t have is the basic good will, the basic humanity,the decency and goodheartedness.

  • Corporatocracy: How the Corporate Welfare State Divides and Conquers

    A small, readily-identifiable ruling oligarchy that no serious political observer denies the existence of is able to keep the public from attacking it by dividing them along ideological grounds so that the public spends all their time arguing over definitions and splitting doctrinal hairs instead of attacking the commonly acknowledged enemy. You couldn’t ask for a more perfect system of control.