Oil Dinosaurs Face Extinction: State Oil Companies and the Meteor-Strike of Low Oil Prices

State-owned oil companies that don’t slash expenses to align with revenues and boost critical investment in the infrastructure needed to maintain production will suffer financial extinction.

Domestic and international energy companies are responding to the 50% decline in the price of oil by doing what’s necessary to remain in business: they’re slashing payroll, postponing capital investments, delaying new projects and soliciting price cuts from suppliers and subcontractors.

This is the discipline of profit-driven capitalism: if expenses exceed revenues, profits vanish, losses pile up, capital contracts and eventually the company runs out of cash (and access to credit) and closes down.

Unfortunately for state-owned oil companies, the feedback of expenses, losses and access to credit are superceded by the need to feed hordes of parasites: the state-owned company exists not to generate profits but to fund large payrolls and support state officials and cronies.

Stripped of the discipline of markets and profits, state-oil companies exist to serve the interests of the state’s Elites and their cronies and favored constituents. As a result, critical infrastructure has fallen into obsolescence, capital investments have been hollowed out and the expertise needed to maintain production has eroded.

The state-owned oil companies are like dinosaurs: the extinction meteor of low oil prices has smashed their ecosystem, and all they can do is watch the sky darken as revenues crater and expenses and debt remain at unsustainably high levels.

Case in point: the Brazilian state-run oil giant Petrobas is heavily in debt ($115 billion in 2013) and in danger of defaulting:

The firm has become one of the largest corporate borrowers in the world as it seeks to fund an investment program worth some $221 billion over the next five years, much of which is to develop huge oil fields that lie deep below Atlantic waters off the country’s southeast coastline.Brazilian state-run oil giant Petrobas faces threat of default on US$54 billion in debt:

Those efforts have turned Petrobras into the region’s most indebted company, with net debt of 268 billion Brazilian reais ($115 billion) at the end of 2013. That figure was 36% higher than at the end of 2012, in large part from depreciation of the Brazilian real against the dollar during 2013.

Brazil’s Petrobras May See Its Rating Downgraded

Moody’s Investors Service has placed Petrobras S.A.’s global foreign currency and local currency debt ratings on review for a possible downgrade. This would be the second time Petrobras’ debt ratings was downgraded by Moody’s after in October the oil giant’s debt ratings was downgraded from Baa1 to Baa2 stating that the company’s outlook remained negative.In March, before the corruption scandal broke, another risk ratings company, Standard & Poor’s cut Brazil’s debt rating to its lowest investment grade ‘due to the erosion of the country’s public accounts and slow economic growth.’

According to S&P the state-controlled oil company’s smaller projected liquidity and lower cash flow generation led to the downgrade.

Correspondent Mark G. explains the mechanics of the financial extinction process:

If Moody’s follows through then Petrobras will drop to Baa2, or two notches above junk. By the way, Rosneft is already at Baa2. And so is Lukoil. There are plenty of other Russian (and Brazilian) corporate debtors in this situation.

The question – which is almost completely political at this point – is what happens when Moody’s reduces its ratings on this BRICS paper to Ba1 and below where it belongs. i.e. Junkland.

1. There are plenty of US institutions that legally cannot hold this degraded paper in their portfolios after it drops to Ba1. Beginning with those perennial yield hogs, US based life insurance companies.

2. At this point hard-currency interest rates charged to the submerging market debtors will soar for rollover refinancing.

Thank you, Mark, for laying out the path to extinction. Hard-currency means the U.S. dollar (USD) in most cases, and as the currencies of oil exporting nations crater (see Russia, Nigeria, Brazil, et al.), the state-owned oil companies attempting to roll over debt or borrow enough to stave off insolvency are being hit with multiple meteors:declining currencies, ratings downgrades and plummeting revenues.

Companies that are being operated as going concerns are responding quickly and decisively to the meteor-strike of collapsing prices. State-owned oil companies that don’t slash expenses to align with revenues and boost critical investment in the infrastructure needed to maintain production will suffer financial extinction.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • the silenced masses

    The problem isn’t state-owned companies, the problem is state-owned companies run by corrupt governments and officials. Privatization has not benefited society in the long run. Resources are sold off well below their value, thousands of workers are fired, prices go up, efficiency goes down and there’s less revenue for the government. The only people who really benefit are the wealthy.

    We need to rethink state ownership. I find it difficult to believe that it is beyond the capacity of the human intellect to devise a system that is efficient and beneficial to the masses

    • Luiz

      the main problem is not the lack of intelectual capacity, but the lack of emotional empaty for those who suffer. We, human beeings, only want to profit and prosper on the labor of others. The only diference from the past is that the tecnology we developed in the last several centuries allows us to explode the planet if we want.

  • paul

    Since the ‘private’ corporate giants are much larger, they may indeed being trying to destroy the state owned companies, but it is the state owned companies that, in a properly run country, try to use the profits for the benefit of the people, and that makes them far far far better. Venezuela has achieved great things this way. So did Libya. No, they aren’t perfect, and yes there surely is a place for (much smaller) private companies, but they are generally far better. Private companies are often far more corrupt than governments are. Indeed, they often corrupt governments. The ‘discipline of the market’ is so exaggerated that it almost amounts to a lie. The most important discipline is informed engaged citizenry – whether they are interacting with a public or a private entity.

  • goingnowherefast

    Private enterprise is destroying the whole biosphere and this guy is singing its praises. There is no such thing as infinite growth on a finite planet. That is magical thinking. If humanity doesn’t snap out of its delusion soon, all is lost.

    • jimmydominic

      amen, I hate when WB publishes this stuff

    • Rollo10

      Exactly. How do they expect infinite growth when not paying the wages to sustain what they have? Where does growth come from? From people spending?

      • edwardrynearson

        hard to call something a science which uses the dollar, an arbitray unit of measurment, in its metrics