Resolved: To Stop Imagining that Anything’s Been Resolved

Things that humans are probably stuck with: eating, drinking, breathing, sex, love, friendship, anger, fear, joy, death, hope and change.

Things that some humans used to commonly claim humanity was permanently and inevitably stuck with (but have stopped thinking about in those terms, even if the thing is still around): monarchy, slavery, blood feuds, dueling, human sacrifice, cannibalism, corporal punishment, second-class status for women, bigotry toward GLBT, feudalism, Eric Cantor.

Things that humans illogically, baselessly, shortsightedly, and absurdly assume must always be with us, as if nothing had ever changed before: environmental destruction, war, mass-incarceration, capital punishment, police forces, religion, carnivorianism, extreme materialism, nuclear energy and weaponry, racism, poverty, plutocracy, capitalism, nationalism, the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Senate, the CIA, guns, the NSA, Guantanamo prison, torture, Hillary Clinton.

The year 2014 will be remembered as yet another year in which we inched closer toward environmental and militarized catastrophe, but also perhaps as a year in which crisis and enlightenment combined to open a few more eyes to the full range of possibilities available.

How often have you heard things like “We can’t end war, because there is evil in the world, but we can end unjust wars” or “Renewable energy is a nice idea but can’t actually work (even though it works in other countries)” or “We need police — we just need accountability when certain police officers perform badly” or “We could legalize drugs but we’d still need prisons or we’d all be raped and killed” or “If we don’t kill murderers we’ll have more murder (like all those countries that have abolished capital punishment and have less murder)” or “We need reforms but we can’t survive without the CIA or something like it — we can’t just not spy on people” or “Ever-increasing environmental destruction is inevitable”?

That last one could be true if feedback loops have already taken the earth’s climate to a point of no return. But it can’t be true in terms of human behavior. Nor can any of the others. And I suspect a lot of people see my point and agree with me on it. But how many view all of the above sentences as ludicrous?

A serious argument could be made that a human utopia should be policed by a police force. But no serious argument can be made that a police force is an inevitable accompaniment of our species, a species that saw 99% of its existence unpoliced. Most people in the small number of places that are at war take no part in it. Nations go for centuries without war. Homo sapiens went most of our existence without war. Massive institutions cannot be inevitable. Hunger and love are the kind of things that are inevitable. We ought to start hearing assertions of inevitability for institutions as ridiculous nonsense. Doing so might be the most serious action we can take.

Of course reforming a criminal justice system a little bit is the proper first step whether you think another step can follow or not. But the direction of the step may vary if you have a different final destination in mind. There’s a difference between ending a war in order to be better prepared for other wars, and ending a war because it kills people and exemplifies an institution that should be dismantled and eliminated. Both efforts can have the same short-term result, but only one has the potential to go further and help avoid the next war.

An argument — I hesitate to call it serious — could be made that pretty much everything is going well, and that nothing much should be altered. Not only can such an argument be made, but it is subtly and powerfully made by just about everything that is ever said on our televisions and in our newspapers. It does not, however, add up to any argument that everything must inevitably continue unchanged, that nothing can be slowly or rapidly made over into a different sort of world.

We need to resolve to realize that nothing has been resolved, history has not ended, questions of politics have not been settled — and that they never will be, that the very idea is incoherent. And isn’t that what makes life worth living?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Foster Patterson

    David, you’re a total clod. Nothing, absolutely nothing you said is coherent or rational. One moron spouting blather because he has a podium. Sad, that this site has devolved to opinionated poop by fools. It had begun as better.

    Nothing gets better until ignorance like yours is eradicated with truth. Keep up the bad work for the other side.

    • fritz

      Holding One’s own Simplicity dear, and cover it, with One’s own “Believe”, surely is the scientific way ! So speaks “Uniiversal TRUTH”!?!!

  • Nonanon25

    You left out murder, rape, and kidnapping. I only include those because you included bigotry against LGBT. I will tend to agree with Foster on this, your pablum is reconstituted and bland. Let’s see, there’s a bible verse in there somewhere about being lukewarm, but the chapter and verse elude me. Ah, there it is, Revelation 3:16. What did you leave out. Oh, that mine enemy would write a book. It’s Job.

    David, nice try.

  • Grampa Goat

    “But how many view all of the above sentences as ludicrous? “Neither one of you specifically countered anything that Mr. Swanson posted. You’ve both missed the entire point of what was being said in that brief essay, but I’m not at all surprised. Your comments are a lot like the commotion that was made over scientist Matt Johnson’s t-shirt while somehow missing the damned point that they had landed the first spacecraft on a comet. With hope, and irony, the aforementioned point will also go unnoticed.

    • Nonanon25

      Yes, I did. It’s an end run around stating everything he supports and decrying everything he doesn’t. I’m not going to get drawn into the minutiae of how and why he’s wrong since I don’t care to debate it.

      I don’t care what point he’s making and I think you mean Matt Taylor, I looked it up.

      I think you missed my point, or maybe you didn’t and you just ignored it. I didn’t realize David, whom I don’t know and don’t follow, needed an apologist. Or maybe he does. I don’t know you, either. Are you his publicist?

    • Grampa Goat

      My last sentence correctly predicted that the point would be missed and, lo and behold, what happened? You don’t care to debate, yet posted a rebuttal. You don’t want to be bogged down with details concerning specific points that were out of line with both Swanson and myself, yet expect a reasonable amount of understanding from others when it comes to seeing things your way. Whatever way that is. Everyone has their opinion, but it seems like logic and reasoning should be utilized to understand what the devil someone’s on about.

  • Dec 24, 2014 Elf on Shelf Toy Teaches Kids to Love Our Surveillance Society

    A new Christmas “tradition” has emerged that not only has Santa making a list of who’s naughty and nice, but a personal “Elf” to watch over children, spy on them in every room and “report” back to the North Pole ahead of Christmas.