Politics and Police Stop Terrorism 83% – Military Only 7% – of the Time

Top Military Advisor Predicted the Rise of the Islamic State 6 Years Ago

The Rand Corporation has been a top advisor to the U.S. military for 66 years.

We noted in 2008 that a Rand study found:

Terrorists should be perceived and described as criminals, not holy warriors, and our analysis suggests that there is no battlefield solution to terrorism.

Let’s look at the details of the study.  Rand points out:

The United States cannot conduct an effective counterterrorism campaign against al Qa’ida or other terrorist groups without understanding how such groups end.

***

This was the first systematic look at how terrorist groups end. The authors compiled and analyzed a data set of all terrorist groups between 1968 and 2006 ….

***

As depicted in the figure, the authors found that most ended for one of two reasons: They were penetrated and eliminated by local police and intelligence agencies (40 percent), or they reached a peaceful political accommodation with their government (43 percent).

***

In 10 percent of cases, terrorist groups ended because they achieved victory. Military force led to the end of terrorist groups in 7 percent of cases.

***

http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/www/external/pubs/research_briefs/RB9351/images/figure1.gif

The chart is a little difficult to read.  Here’s a new, easily-readable version based on Rand’s data, created by the nonpartisan Institute for Economics and Peace:

Rand’s 2008 summary continues:

Military force has not undermined al Qa’ida. As of 2008, al Qa’ida has remained a strong and competent organization. Its goal is intact: to establish a pan-Islamic caliphate in the Middle East by uniting Muslims to fight infidels and overthrow West-friendly regimes. It continues to employ terrorism and has been involved in more terrorist attacks around the world in the years since September 11, 2001, than in prior years …

Al Qa’ida’s resilience should trigger a fundamental rethinking of U.S. strategy. Its goal of a pan-Islamic caliphate leaves little room for a negotiated political settlement with governments in the Middle East. A more effective U.S. approach would involve a two-front strategy:

  • Make policing and intelligence the backbone of U.S. efforts. Al Qa’ida consists of a network of individuals who need to be tracked and arrested. This requires careful involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as their cooperation with foreign police and intelligence agencies.
  • Minimize the use of U.S. military force. In most operations against al Qa’ida, local military forces frequently have more legitimacy to operate and a better understanding of the operating environment than U.S. forces have. This means a light U.S. military footprint or none at all.

Key to this strategy is replacing the war-on-terrorism orientation with the kind of counterterrorism approach that is employed by most governments facing significant terrorist threats today. Calling the efforts a war on terrorism raises public expectations — both in the United States and elsewhere — that there is a battlefield solution. It also tends to legitimize the terrorists’ view that they are conducting a jihad (holy war) against the United States and elevates them to the status of holy warriors. Terrorists should be perceived as criminals, not holy warriors.

How prescient the Rand report was!  In fact, the U.S. war on terror has increased terrorism.

And see this chart from the Institute for Economics and Peace:

https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/timeline.jpg

Notice how terrorism had been declining since 9/11 … but then started increasing again when we invaded Iraq.

And our wars in Iraq and Syria created the Islamic State (and see this and this) … and gave them their caliphate.

Our entire military approach has made us less secure (more here and here) and increased terrorism.

Postscript:  Sadly, security and stopping terrorism may not be the main goals of the powers-that-be.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • MCB

    They know, and many of us do too, that it’s not about security and stopping terrorism. It’s about using whatever Red Herring(s) are available to them to control as many people as possible. Terrorism works great because Sheeple will always trade liberty for safety/security. Like Ron Paul said. We can’t even keep drugs out of prison; so are we then going to turn our country into a giant prison instead? The answer is “yes”, so we can all live in (forced) happiness (i.e. servitude). The (nanny) State will provide, just don’t let The Constitution get in The State’s way of protecting and providing for us.

  • Rehmat

    RAND knew because it played a significant part in creating Islamophobia and ISIS for the elimination of anti-Israel regimes in the region.

    RAND in its earlier report had warned the USrael of its “military option” against the Islamic Republic. It predicted that any attack by Israel or the US will convince Tehran the importance of nuclear arms as “deterrent” against the world-bullies.

    http://rehmat1.com/2012/06/09/rand-corp-sanctions-against-iran-are-doomed/

    • Not Good

      Perhaps only when Obama has the ISIS black flags painted on US warplanes will people figure out the terrorism scam Washington is running…

      http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=75c_1416348099

    • jl

      Fascinating one has to be subjected to the obfuscation above from WB. They and others continue to spew adulterated terms like terrorists like kids chewing candy. Just another part of the apparatus that divides, conquers, deceives, defrauds, corrupts and obscures reality.

      • MCB

        Speaking of obfuscation, divisiveness, fascination and glittering generalities, project much?

  • Jun 16, 2014 Western Gov Creating Terrorism, ISIS IRAQ: Annie Machon Whistleblower

    Luke Rudkowski interviews former Mi5 whistleblower Annie Machon about the very important fact of Western governments creating false flag terrorism. Annie blew the whistle on very danger!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FojueKxpA6I

    Jun 19, 2014 MP George Galloway: ISIS Western American Allies and Enemies

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDzHFXa7_PY

  • Aug 19, 2014 Massive Joint Military Training Exercise in Niagara Region Ontario

    Dan Dicks and the PFT team cover Exercise Stalwart Guardian 14 which began on Saturday August 16, 2014 in the Niagara region of Ontario. The military exercise involves several armored regiments and over 2,000 Canadian, American, Scottish and British troops operating in public areas.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhAP9V7F5fE

  • Logan Hartanian

    Stopping terrorism is evidently not the goal, when Quilliam and Rand are playing semantic word games claiming that the internet does not cause Islamic Radicalization. The truth is that if we all got our news from newspapers and read books and magazines, know one would publish the drivel that radicalizes and without worldwide walkie-talkies in the form of chat apps, one crazy man in a country couldn’t find his counterpart in another country! But lets boil this down. Quilliam and Rand did assert what I just said and the reason is, free speech must fluorish so jihad does too. Instead of writing useless reports I would like the think tanks to analyze our free speech laws and come up with something between racketeering and conspiracy to allow us to target jihadists, the way Denmark recently has. We need free speech, and the internet, and we need to stop the violent Islamic Dawah propagandists. No one ever taught the young people how to defend their minds from this kind of propaganda. The proof is in the 15,000 European jihadists, in ISIS.