U.S., NATO, Hold Joint War Games in Ukraine, and Give Ukraine Weapons, to Continue Ethnic Cleansing Campaign

Eric Zuesse

During 15-26 September, the U.S. and 14 other NATO countries are holding war games in Ukraine, in order to assist the Ukrainian military to eliminate Ukraine’s cultural Russians. Ukraine is not yet a NATO country, but aims to become one; and NATO under President Obama has ended being any sort of alliance for democracy, and is now instead little more than an alliance against Russia — a Cold War alliance this time not against communism and the Soviet Union (which are long gone), but instead for American conquest, pure and simple, to dominate the entire world militarily — including especially domination over Russia. That would then be Obama’s enduring achievement in foreign policy: extending “The American Century” into a second century.

The Ukrainian Government is too insolvent to buy weapons (officially called “lethal assistance,” by contrast to supplying non-lethal items such as food, vests, etc.). Some unnamed NATO countries are thus now donating weapons, to help the Ukrainian Government slaughter enough residents in Ukraine’s southeast so as to enable the coup-regime that was imposed by Obama on Ukraine in February, to become elected into power in nationwide Ukrainian elections, so that this can be called a ‘democracy,’ though that’s what Obama overthrew in February — the man who was authentically democratically elected in 2010. But what got that man elected was overwhelmingly votes from the areas in Ukraine that are now being bombed by the Government that Obama installed. The Ukrainian ‘election’ that was held on May 25th was held only in Ukraine’s northeast, where Obama’s coup was popular. Ukraine was already bombing and trying to exterminate residents of the southeast. After enough residents there, in the southeast, have either escaped from Ukraine or else been slaughtered by Ukraine’s troops, the anti-Russian Government imposed by Obama in February will finally be able to survive a nationwide election, and then the U.S. will become enabled to install nuclear missiles there, aimed against Russian cities. That achievement can’t happen, however, unless the ethnic cleansing campaign is first successfully completed, because the people who live there are pro-Russian: they therefore must be eliminated before our missiles are installed. That’s also the reason why the people whom Obama installed to run the country are followers of Hitler, a man who hated Russians almost as much as he hated Jews. Ukraine’s best troops slaughtering the residents in Ukraine’s southeast are ardent nazis patterned on Hitler’s SS, and some even call themselves “Nazi.” President Obama doesn’t find that embarrassing; to the contrary: it’s his policy — he approves of this Government, because he installed it.

Under U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, fascists were defeated in Germany, Italy, and Japan; but under U.S. President Barack Obama, nazism, which is the specifically racist form of fascism, is being restored to power in Ukraine, so as to enable the U.S. military to destroy Russia, by placing nuclear missiles right next door to it. In addition, Western oil companies, Monsanto, and other U.S. international corporations, are moving in, and Russian companies are being expelled from Ukraine.

Although America’s Republicans oppose Obama and say that he isn’t supporting enough the Ukrainian Government (that he actually installed), America’s Democrats admire Obama and think that his support of nazis in Ukraine is just fine as it is, and that it achieves just the right balance there, and elsewhere in the world, such as in Iraq and Syria, where the U.S. had brought Sunni Islamic fundamentalism and now wages war against it, likewise in perfect policy-balance.

The United States of today might have sided with Hitler and Mussolini, not only against Stalin, but even against Churchill. We’ve come a long, long, way, since WWII.

If President Obama is a liberal, then what is a conservative, in today’s America? How conservative would that have to be, to qualify as “conservative” here? Yet, still, Mr. Obama is probably less conservative than Hitler, though perhaps only equally conservative as Mussolini, who, after all, wasn’t nearly so obsessed to destroy Russia. Perhaps if Obama had been President during the 1940s, the U.S. would have sent reinforcements to help Hitler’s troops at the Battle of Leningrad.

Anyway, nazism has returned, in Ukraine, thanks to U.S. President Barack Obama.

———-

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Business / Economics, Energy / Environment, General, Politics / World News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • A little confused

    I don’t get it.. Maybe I missed it. But where is the connection between Yatsenyuk and Obama/Nuland?

    • Tangled Web

      “Yats (Yatsenyuk) is our man”– Victoria Nuland

      US diplomat Victoria Nuland’s phonecall leaked

      The assistant US secretary of state, Victoria Nuland, has apologized after her phone conversation about the political crisis in Ukraine was leaked on the internet. The call between Nuland and a US ambassador focused on the future of the country if it gains a new government. Nuland declined to comment on ‘private diplomatic conversations’

      http://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video

      Or…

      “F*** the EU!” (original File) – Victoria Nuland phoning with Geoffrey Pyatt

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIvRljAaNgg

      Victoria Nuland: US-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs
      Geoffrey R. Pyatt: United States Ambassador to Ukraine
      Jeff Feltman: head of the United Nations Department of Political Affairs
      An international guy as the new president (?)
      Robert Serry: Dutch diplomat serving as United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process
      Ban Ki-Moon: Secretary-General of the United Nations
      Jake Sullivan: national security advisor to Joe Biden
      Joe Biden: Vice President USA
      Viktor Yanukovych: President of Ukraine
      Vitali Klitschko, the complicated electron: Leader of the Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform and Member of the Ukrainian Parliament.

  • Guest

    President Roosevelt’s Campaign To Incite War in Europe:
    The Secret Polish Documents

    Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt’s enormous responsibility for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on Roosevelt’s secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. It deals particularly with his efforts to pressure Britain, France and Poland into war against Germany in 1938 and 1939.

    Franklin Roosevelt not only criminally involved America in a war which had already engulfed Europe. He bears a grave responsibility before history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.

    This paper relies heavily on a little-known collection of secret Polish documents which fell into German hands when Warsaw was captured in September 1939. These documents clearly establish Roosevelt’s crucial role in bringing on the Second World War. They also reveal the forces behind the President which pushed for war.

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html

    The Unknown History
    of the 1939 German-Polish Conflict
    http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/wrsynopsis.html

    Churchill’s secret correspondence 1937-1951 with Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann, first president of the State of Israel, from Israeli archives: a complete dossier, 104 pages of facsimiles, from David Irving’s research files for Churchill’s War (pdf, 7.5MB)
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Churchill/Weizmann_Zionists/Weizmann_Churchill_corr.pdf
    or
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/History/Churchill/

    In addition to money supplied by the Czech government, Churchill was financed during the “wilderness years” between 1930 and 1939 by a slush fund emanating from a secret
    pressure group known as the Focus.

    The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London’s wealthiest businessmen, principally, businessmen organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, whose chairman was a man called Sir Bernard Waley Cohen. Sir Bernard Waley Cohen held a private dinner party at his apartment on July 29, 1936. This is in Waley Cohen’s memoirs … The 29th of July, 1936, Waley Cohen set up a slush fund of 50,000 pounds for The Focus, the Churchill pressure group. Now, 50,000 pounds in 1936, multiply that by ten, at least, to get today’s figures. By another three or four to multiply that into Canadian dollars. So, 40 times 50,000 pounds , about $2 million in Canadian terms, was given by Bernard Waley Cohen to this secret pressure group of Churchill in July 1936. The purpose was, the tune that Churchill had to play was, fight Germany. Start warning the world about Germany, about Nazi Germany. Churchill, of course, one of our most brilliant orators, a magnificent writer, did precisely that.
    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_Okeefe.html