Ron Paul on 9/11: “I Believe That If We Ever Get The Full Truth, We’ll Find Out That Our Government Had It In The Records Exactly What The Plans Were, Or At Least Close To It”

Background:  Overwhelming evidence shows that 9/11 was foreseeable. Indeed, Al Qaeda crashing planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon was itself foreseeable.  And see this.

No wonder the movement to declassify 9/11 information is gaining momentum.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
This entry was posted in Politics / World News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Informed++

    Ron Paul’s true followers will never forget the wound he left behind when he decided not to run as a third party, and instead he chose to continue to fight within a corrupt, unrepairable party. Who cares about getting into the debates. Now his followers are divided and scattered that you cannot tell the good from the bad anymore. It could have been a break through; a rare opportunity that appears to come every 100 years or so. What a dream it was.

  • purrsun

    As controlled-opposition, Ron Paul has served his handlers well. Leaves crumbs for starving mice who nibble a cheesy morsel, and then scurry off in wrong direction. No doubt that the Agenda utilizes convenient patsies. Flashback: AJ warned his listeners that Saudia Arabia “owned Hollywood”.

    • T. Matson

      Or you are paid by the “jews” to make people think that Ron and Rand Paul are in your pocket which if true would mean they would instantly lose support and weaken Rand’s chances to become President. Since your side always wants to have a vassal President in office like Vassal Obama and Vassal Bush—I am guessing Rand Paul is no vassal. In fact he is a libertarian–meaning he wants government to stay out of the peoples lives–since you are people to–maybe you guys should just take a F’ing vacation and leave us Humans alone for a few years? Sound good? Great……

  • My friend was a delegate at the RNC and videoed/witnessed a rigging and changing of the rules to thwart Ron Paul.

  • nomadfiles

    Nobody’s perfect. If he’s working to get these classified docs released I say more power to him. Maybe some more and diverse (and imperfect) political leaders can form a coalition with him and generate enough power to get it done. Maybe if we can put a dent in the wall that surrounds our secret government we can eventually make the hole wide enough to peep through.

    I ask you. If most of the important things our government does are kept secret from the people, how is that representative government?. How is it that our mighty judicial system aids in covering up crimes like the JFK, RFK, MLK assassinations and 9/11? What kind of judicial system is it that seals documents to protect individuals involved in state crimes?

    We have got to start somewhere in exposing the hidden traitors among those that govern us. I’m with Paul.

  • BuelahMan

    If Paul were truthful, he’d suggest that it is obvious that hijackers in planes NEVER blew UP those two towers (much less demolished the WTC7 or put that hole in the Pentagon).. Paul is not truthful.

    • nomadfiles

      Who among our political class is? A truthful politician? That’s an oxymoron.

  • Rehmat

    Last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the US-based Jewish civil liberty group, condemned former US Rep. Ron Paul for agreeing to be the keynote speaker at a conference sponsored by Canadian Fatima Center. The Catholic group, has long been designated by Jewish groups as “radical Christian” and “Jew-hater”. Incidently, Mel Gibson’s father Hutton Gibson is contacted with the group.

    The conference is titled ‘Fatima: The Path to Peace’ – calling for the merger of the Church and State in the world government. The conference will be held Niagra Falls’ Scotiabank Convention Centre from September 8-13, 2013. In addition to Ron Paul, the other notable speakers will include Roberto Fiore, former EU member from Italy and John F. McManus, president of John Birch Society. McManus is linked to E. Michael Jones, editor of Culture Wars monthly Catholic magazine. All these three dudes are well-known “antisemites”, according to the SPLC.

    http://rehmat1.com/2013/09/03/splc-ron-paul-mingles-with-canadian-jew-haters/

    • Hugh Beaumont

      What are you – a conspiracy theorist?

  • Rothbardian Slip

    No one has ever heard of the dancing Israelis? Anyone who thinks Mossad knew and the CIA didn’t is a lot more trusting than me.

  • Bev

    Dear Ron Paul, Please investigate the following so that you do not aid and abet a crime:

    via: http://www.silverdoctors.com/jim-willie-hyperinflation-bombshell-nato-is-dead-king-dollar-wrecked/
    Jim Willie Hyperinflation Bombshell: NATO is Dead, King Dollar Wrecked!

    911 DATA COMING TO TABLE

    Lastly, a question: Why was no information ever disclosed on the World Trade Center acting as the site of the largest private bank in the world? The event on that fateful day was a bank heist, the
    largest in humankind history. The loot was $100 billion in gold bullion, $100 billion in bearer bonds, and $100 billion in diamonds.

    (And, Fascism. All politicians now have to act to undo Fascism in order to solve the crime on 9/11, and protect our/all people and nation/world.)

    The USGovt reserves the right to kill any citizen, to arrest any citizen, to seize any citizen assets, to force any citizen into labor without pay, to obstruct citizen meetings, and to confiscate citizen
    firearms. Such is fascism in full glory. The Patriot Act (hardly patriotic) was a Fascist Manifesto which was imposed next to the formation of the American Gestapo.

    The United States seeks to pursue the Western totalitarian state by means of pulling down the European Economy, from the broken system to emerge the reconstruction of oppressive fascism. A wrecked Western Economy is pre-requisite. The small ray of light slips through, as the Fascist Business Model has a crack in it. Usually the big powerful corporations support the government fascist dictums. However, Exxon Mobil, Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, and Boeing stand in opposition to sanctions against Russia. The game is fast changing. The Emperor’s court is showing critical internal defections.

  • htitzhoff

    Of course it was foreseeable. Tom Clancy’s “Executive Orders” featured a Jumbo Jet flown into the Capitol Building during a State of the Union speech. If ONLY that would have happened instead.

  • Ike

    Dear Friends
    Check this…

    The 9/11 Triple
    Cross
    Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on
    pinterest_shareMore Sharing Services

    The “reversible false flag” scheme
    and the “hijacked plot” hypothesis
    A new paradigm in 9/11ology
    by Laurent
    Guyénot
    Three major thesis are in competition concerning the culprit of the
    9/11 attacks:
    1. Islam Job: the official conclusion of the 9/11 Commission,
    blaming Muslim terrorists in general, and Osama bin Laden in particular;
    2.
    Inside Job: the dominant thesis within the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, which
    accuses the American government, or a faction within the American Deep
    State;
    3. Mossad Job: the rising alternative thesis within the community of
    truth seekers, which claim that the masterminds were a Zionist network close to
    the Israeli Likud.
    There are variations on each thesis and middle grounds
    between them, but three camps can clearly be distinguished: the first ridicule
    the second as “conspiracy theorists”, while the second loath the third as
    anti-Semites. Each thus justifies its refusal to weigh the evidence produced by
    the other. Acknowledging this reality, by renouncing the bipolar vision of an
    information warfare between official liars and 9/11 truthers, and paying
    attention to the debate (or absence of the debate) between Inside-jobbers and
    Mossad-jobbers, is the first step toward a paradigm shift in
    “9/11ology”.

    This article takes the view of the third thesis. The author
    belongs to those who, after thousands of hours of research, came to the
    conclusion that the 9/11 false flag operation was planned by a Zionist network,
    with the aim of dragging the United States into a “war on terror” of their
    invention, of which the only ultimate beneficiary will be Israel, as Netanyahu
    well understood from the very day: “It’s very good […], it will generate
    immediate sympathy […], strengthen the bond between our two peoples.”[1]
    I
    have already listed the evidence against Israel in a previous article and in my
    book JFK-9/11 (Progressive Press, 2014). The subject of this article is not the
    truth on 9/11—who did what and how—, but the media war on 9/11: who says what
    and why. Nevertheless, such an approach requires that we are able to weigh the
    credibility of each claim, and we will do that on a few key points.
    We can
    notice from the outset that theses 1 and 3 each accuse a foreign power, unlike
    thesis 2. Before even looking at the evidence, it is obvious that an Outside Job
    thesis is more credible than the Inside Job thesis. There is something monstrous
    in the idea that a government can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by
    killing thousands of them, just for starting a series of wars which are not even
    in the nation’s interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the US under
    the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair play. This is an
    important remark, because it makes us wonder how and why the 9/11 Truth movement
    has been led to endorse massively the outrageous thesis 2 without even
    considering the more likely thesis 3. This is one of the questions I will tackle
    here.
    The thesis that the masterminds of 9/11 worked for Israel does not mean
    that the Bush administration is innocent. Thesis 3 admits that thesis 2, unlike
    thesis 1, is not completely false and rests on hard evidence pointing to US
    complicity. But it claims that thesis 2 overrates that evidence while ignoring
    the evidence pointing to Israel. The question is to what extent it does so
    intentionally, that is, to what extent thesis 2 is a “controlled opposition”
    intended to cover up the truth of thesis 3.
    Asking this type of question does
    not mean suspecting anyone who defends an erroneous or incomplete theory of
    being a hypocrite. Most people defending one theory or the other do so
    sincerely, based on the information they have access to. I have myself been a
    believer in thesis 1 for 7 years, and in thesis 2 for 2 years, before
    progressively moving on to thesis 3 from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume
    that those who lead masses into error on a long term, are not just mistaken but
    lying —they may also be lying to themselves, i.e., ……
    Read the rest at

    http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/
    The 9/11 Triple
    Cross
    Posted by Laurent Guyénot
    Sunday, August 31st, 2014

  • DanielNoel

    Ron Paul is doing is job, beating around the bush–pun intended–while trying hard to not beat the bush, as if he was too dumb to draw an intelligent conclusion from watching Building 7’s video record.

    Love,